pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.17214 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Dielectric Screening in Electromagnetic Dressing of Semiconductors

Quentin Courtade , Umberto Dellasette , Sotirios Fragkos , St\'ephane Petit , Dominique Descamps , Yann Mairesse , Samuel Beaulieu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 21:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords dielectric screeningVolkov sidebandsFloquet-Volkov dressingtime-resolved photoemissionvan der Waals semiconductorspolarization dependenceinternal reflectionslight-matter interaction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Polarization-dependent Volkov sideband intensities in photoemission spectra yield lower bounds on the real part of the dielectric function in layered semiconductors GeS, SnS, and WSe2.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how dielectric screening inside the material shapes the balance between Floquet dressing of electrons inside the solid and Volkov dressing of photoelectrons outside it. Using a Fresnel-based model of the driving-field penetration together with a scattering description of Volkov amplitudes, the authors extract lower bounds on the real dielectric constant from the polarization dependence of sideband intensities; these bounds fall between literature values for monolayer and bulk crystals. The same framework accounts for the appearance of high-order nonlinear sidebands at higher pump fluence and for delayed replica signals produced when the pump undergoes multiple internal reflections before dressing the outgoing electrons.

Core claim

A simple Fresnel-equation model combined with an electron-scattering treatment of Volkov amplitudes isolates the effect of dielectric screening on Volkov sideband intensities in time- and angle-resolved photoemission from GeS, SnS, and 2H-WSe2. The resulting lower bounds on the real part of the dielectric function lie between the accepted monolayer and bulk values. At higher fluence the same Volkov channels produce high-order sidebands that display clear nonlinear signatures, while the quasi-transparent character of the below-gap pump allows the field to propagate inside the crystal and generate temporally delayed Volkov replicas through total-internal-reflection evanescent fields.

What carries the argument

Polarization-dependent Volkov sideband intensities interpreted through a Fresnel-equation model of field penetration plus an electron-scattering description of Volkov amplitudes

If this is right

  • Dielectric screening can dominate Volkov contributions over Floquet dressing in below-gap pump geometries on layered semiconductors.
  • Increasing pump fluence produces high-order Volkov sidebands whose intensities reflect nonlinear light-matter coupling.
  • Quasi-transparent pump propagation and multiple total internal reflections create delayed Volkov replicas visible in pump-probe traces.
  • The extracted bounds lie between monolayer and bulk dielectric constants for the three materials studied.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same polarization-analysis approach could be tested on other quasi-2D materials to map how surface versus bulk screening evolves with layer number.
  • If the lower bounds prove robust, time-resolved photoemission could become a contact-free probe of nonequilibrium dielectric response without requiring separate optical ellipsometry.
  • The delayed-replica signals offer a route to time-domain separation of surface and bulk dressing contributions in the same dataset.

Load-bearing premise

The Fresnel model plus electron-scattering description of Volkov amplitudes is sufficient to isolate dielectric screening without significant confounding from Floquet processes or other scattering channels.

What would settle it

Independent optical measurements of the real dielectric function that fall below the lower bounds extracted from the sideband intensities, or sideband intensity ratios that deviate from Fresnel predictions when the driving-field polarization is rotated, would falsify the extraction procedure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.17214 by Dominique Descamps, Quentin Courtade, Samuel Beaulieu, Sotirios Fragkos, St\'ephane Petit, Umberto Dellasette, Yann Mairesse.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a)), resulting in a lower fitted value of ϵ. We there￾fore conclude that the dielectric constants extracted from our analysis represent lower bound estimates for the stud￾ied materials. When artificially adding some enhanced but realistic contributions from competing phenomena such as Floquet states, the fitted dielectric constant re￾mains in the confidence interval of the fitting. Uncertain￾ties were obt… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (d), this behavior is well captured by Eq. 8 when using the fitted dielectric constant of 2H-WSe2 and ac￾counting for the second-order nonlinearity of the process. In conclusion, this section demonstrates that increasing the pump fluence enables the generation of high-order Volkov replicas, which exhibit clear signatures of nonlin￾ear light–matter interactions in their temporal dynamics, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (b). As discussed in section II B, accurately ac￾counting for all electric field components at the surface is crucial to correctly describe the Volkov intensity and its momentum distribution. The Volkov intensity is pro￾portional to |α| 2 , which depends on the Ex, Ey, and Ez components of the electric field, each of which is deter￾mined by the angle of incidence θ, the polarization angle ϕ, and the dielec… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nonequilibrium manipulation of quantum materials via electromagnetic dressing provides an on-demand route to tailoring electronic band structures through Floquet engineering. Time- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy offers a direct means to probe these light-dressed electronic states. In such photoemission experiments, dressing can also occur for quasi-free electrons outside the material, giving rise to Volkov states. In certain cases, strong surface screening reduces the penetration of the driving field into the solid, resulting in Volkov contributions that dominate over Floquet ones. In this work, we systematically investigate the influence of materials' dielectric properties on Floquet-Volkov dressing of semiconductors, focusing on bulk layered van der Waals materials GeS, SnS, and 2H-WSe$_2$. First, by combining a simple model based on Fresnel equations with an electron-scattering description of Volkov amplitudes, we use polarization-dependent Volkov sideband intensities to extract a lower bound for the real part of the materials' dielectric functions, which typically lie between the reported dielectric constants for monolayer and bulk crystals. We demonstrate that increasing the fluence of the pump laser enables the generation of high-order Volkov sidebands which exhibit clear signatures of nonlinear light-matter interactions. Finally, we show that for our experimental geometry, the quasi-transparent nature of semiconductors in below-band-gap driving regime allows the optical pump to propagate within the sample and undergo multiple total internal reflections, producing temporally delayed Volkov replicas in pump-probe measurements via dressing of photoelectrons by evanescent fields. These systematic studies uncover previously unexplored aspects of Floquet-Volkov dressing in solids, highlighting the role of dielectric screening of the driving field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates dielectric screening effects on Floquet-Volkov dressing in bulk layered van der Waals semiconductors (GeS, SnS, 2H-WSe2) via time- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Using a model that combines Fresnel equations with an electron-scattering description of Volkov amplitudes, the authors extract lower bounds on the real part of the dielectric function from polarization-dependent sideband intensities; these bounds lie between reported monolayer and bulk values. They further demonstrate high-order Volkov sidebands at elevated fluences and temporally delayed Volkov replicas arising from multiple internal reflections of the pump beam in the quasi-transparent below-gap regime.

Significance. If the extraction procedure is robust, the work supplies a practical route to bound dielectric screening from photoemission sideband data and clarifies the relative weight of Volkov versus Floquet contributions in surface-sensitive measurements. The reported bounds and the observation of nonlinear high-order sidebands plus delayed replicas constitute concrete, falsifiable signatures that can be tested in other van der Waals systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (model section): the lower bound on Re(ε) is obtained by matching the Fresnel-scattering Volkov model to measured sideband intensities; because the same model parameters enter both the interpretation and the extraction, an explicit demonstration that the bound remains stable under plausible variations in the scattering description or inclusion of weak Floquet amplitudes is required to support the central claim.
  2. [§3] §3 (experimental results): the manuscript states that the extracted bounds lie between monolayer and bulk dielectric constants, yet no quantitative fit metrics (e.g., reduced χ², residual plots, or sensitivity to fluence) or raw intensity data with error bars are provided; without these, the statistical reliability of the reported lower bounds cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption: the polarization angle convention (s- vs p-) should be stated explicitly with respect to the sample surface normal.
  2. [§1] The abstract and §1 cite prior Volkov work in gases but omit key references on Volkov states in solids; adding two or three representative citations would improve context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the two major comments below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the presentation of the model robustness and the statistical reliability of the extracted bounds.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (model section): the lower bound on Re(ε) is obtained by matching the Fresnel-scattering Volkov model to measured sideband intensities; because the same model parameters enter both the interpretation and the extraction, an explicit demonstration that the bound remains stable under plausible variations in the scattering description or inclusion of weak Floquet amplitudes is required to support the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit stability check is needed to support the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection in the Supplementary Information that varies the electron-scattering length by ±20 % around the nominal value and includes a weak Floquet amplitude (up to 10 % of the Volkov contribution). The extracted lower bound on Re(ε) shifts by less than 5 % under these changes and remains between the monolayer and bulk literature values. The updated figures and accompanying text are now included in the revised version. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (experimental results): the manuscript states that the extracted bounds lie between monolayer and bulk dielectric constants, yet no quantitative fit metrics (e.g., reduced χ², residual plots, or sensitivity to fluence) or raw intensity data with error bars are provided; without these, the statistical reliability of the reported lower bounds cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative fit metrics and error bars are required for a full assessment of reliability. The revised manuscript now reports reduced χ² values for each polarization-dependent fit, includes residual plots in the Supplementary Material, and displays raw sideband intensities with statistical error bars derived from multiple pump-probe scans. We have also added a fluence-sensitivity analysis showing that the extracted lower bound varies by less than 8 % across the experimental fluence range. These additions are incorporated in the revised main text and Supplementary Information. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper describes a model-based extraction of lower bounds on Re(ε) by fitting a Fresnel-equation plus Volkov-scattering description to measured polarization-dependent sideband intensities. This is a standard parameter-extraction procedure from data rather than a derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing steps in the provided text. The central claim remains an empirical bound obtained via an independent optical model, with no evidence that any reported result is statistically forced or self-definitional.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Fresnel equations for interface optics and the domain assumption that electron scattering fully captures Volkov amplitudes; no explicit free parameters are introduced beyond the extracted bounds, and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Fresnel equations accurately describe reflection, transmission, and field penetration at the vacuum-material interface for the driving laser
    Invoked to model how dielectric screening reduces the internal field strength relative to the external pump.
  • domain assumption Electron-scattering description of Volkov amplitudes is sufficient to relate sideband intensities to the screened field without additional Floquet or many-body corrections
    Combined with Fresnel model to convert polarization-dependent intensities into dielectric bounds.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5623 in / 1575 out tokens · 41292 ms · 2026-05-15T21:25:46.164600+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and power transmission (T p

    work page

  2. [2]

    (10) Hereθis the incidence angle with respect to the normal of the sample surface andθ r = arcsin (sinθ/n 1) is the refraction angle (Snell’s law)

    read: Rp 01 = n1 cosθ−cosθ r n1 cosθ+ cosθ r 2 , T p 01 = 1−R p 01. (10) Hereθis the incidence angle with respect to the normal of the sample surface andθ r = arcsin (sinθ/n 1) is the refraction angle (Snell’s law). For simplicity, we omit the superscriptpin the following expressions. Energy conser- vation and reciprocity impliesR 10 =R 01 andT 10 =T 01. ...

    work page 1969

  3. [3]

    sin2 θi −n 2 01 cosϕ,(17) Ey = 2 cosθip 1−n 2 01 sinϕ,(18) Ez = 2 sinθi cosθ i p 1−n 2 01 q (1 +n 2

    work page

  4. [4]

    GPR LIGHT

    sin2 θi −n 2 01 cosϕ.(19) Heren 01 = 1/n1, andθ i is the incident angle just un- der the material top surface, which depends on both the refraction angleθ r and the incremental tiltδacquired at each reflection from the bottom interface. The parameter ϕdenotes the polarization angle of the incoming IR field as in Fig. 2(a). The total fieldEassociated with ...

    work page 2030

  5. [5]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, and D. Hsieh. Towards prop- erties on demand in quantum materials.Nature Materi- als, 16(11):1077–1088, Nov 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Kennes, Martin Claassen, Simon Gerber, James W

    Alberto de la Torre, Dante M. Kennes, Martin Claassen, Simon Gerber, James W. McIver, and Michael A. Sentef. Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials.Rev. Mod. Phys., 93:041002, Oct 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D mate- rials and topological materials.Nature Reviews Physics, 4(1):33–48, November 2021

    Changhua Bao, Peizhe Tang, Dong Sun, and Shuyun Zhou. Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D mate- rials and topological materials.Nature Reviews Physics, 4(1):33–48, November 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene.Phys

    Takashi Oka and Hideo Aoki. Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene.Phys. Rev. B, 79:081406, Feb 2009

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    Y. H. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik. Observation of Floquet-Bloch states on the sur- face of a topological insulator.Science, 342(6157):453– 457, 2013

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Sie, James W

    Edbert J. Sie, James W. McIver, Yi-Hsien Lee, Liang Fu, Jing Kong, and Nuh Gedik. Valley-selective optical stark effect in monolayer WS 2.Nature Materials, 14(3):290– 294, Mar 2015

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Lee, and Nuh Gedik

    Fahad Mahmood, Ching-Kit Chan, Zhanybek Alpich- shev, Dillon Gardner, Young Lee, Patrick A. Lee, and Nuh Gedik. Selective scattering between Floquet–Bloch and Volkov states in a topological insulator.Nature Physics, 12(4):306–310, April 2016

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Floquet engineering of quantum materials.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 10(1):387–408, 2019

    Takashi Oka and Sota Kitamura. Floquet engineering of quantum materials.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 10(1):387–408, 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Rudner and Netanel H

    Mark S. Rudner and Netanel H. Lindner. Band structure engineering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topological insulators.Nature Reviews Physics, 2(5):229– 244, May 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Coherent multidimensional photoelectron spectroscopy of ultrafast quasiparticle dressing by light.Nature Com- munications, 11(1):2230, May 2020

    Marcel Reutzel, Andi Li, Zehua Wang, and Hrvoje Petek. Coherent multidimensional photoelectron spectroscopy of ultrafast quasiparticle dressing by light.Nature Com- munications, 11(1):2230, May 2020

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri. Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene.Nature Physics, 16(1):38–41, Jan 2020

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Sven Aeschlimann, Shunsuke A. Sato, Razvan Krause, Mariana Ch´ avez-Cervantes, Umberto De Giovannini, Hannes H¨ ubener, Stiven Forti, Camilla Coletti, Kerstin Hanff, Kai Rossnagel, Angel Rubio, and Isabella Gierz. Survival of Floquet-Bloch states in the presence of scat- tering.Nano Letters, 21(12):5028–5035, Jun 2021

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Floquet Engineering of Black Phosphorus upon Below-Gap Pumping.Physical Review Letters, 131(11):116401, September 2023

    Shaohua Zhou, Changhua Bao, Benshu Fan, Fei Wang, Haoyuan Zhong, Hongyun Zhang, Peizhe Tang, Wenhui Duan, and Shuyun Zhou. Floquet Engineering of Black Phosphorus upon Below-Gap Pumping.Physical Review Letters, 131(11):116401, September 2023

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Pseudospin-selective Floquet band engi- neering in black phosphorus.Nature, 614(7946):75–80, February 2023

    Shaohua Zhou, Changhua Bao, Benshu Fan, Hui Zhou, Qixuan Gao, Haoyuan Zhong, Tianyun Lin, Hang Liu, Pu Yu, Peizhe Tang, Sheng Meng, Wenhui Duan, and Shuyun Zhou. Pseudospin-selective Floquet band engi- neering in black phosphorus.Nature, 614(7946):75–80, February 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Hughes, and Fahad Mahmood

    Nina Bielinski, Rajas Chari, Julian May-Mann, Soyeun Kim, Jack Zwettler, Yujun Deng, Anuva Aishwarya, Subhajit Roychowdhury, Chandra Shekhar, Makoto Hashimoto, Donghui Lu, Jiaqiang Yan, Claudia Felser, Vidya Madhavan, Zhi-Xun Shen, Taylor L. Hughes, and Fahad Mahmood. Floquet–Bloch manipulation of the dirac gap in a topological antiferromagnet.Nat. Phys.,...

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Johnson, Vishal Tiwari, Fang Liu, David A

    Yuki Kobayashi, Christian Heide, Amalya C. Johnson, Vishal Tiwari, Fang Liu, David A. Reis, Tony F. Heinz, and Shambhu Ghimire. Floquet engineering of strongly driven excitons in monolayer tungsten disulfide.Nature Physics, 19(2):171–176, Feb 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Floquet en- gineering of topological states in realistic quantum ma- terials via light-matter interactions.Progress in Surface Science, 98(2):100705, 2023

    Hang Liu, Haijun Cao, and Sheng Meng. Floquet en- gineering of topological states in realistic quantum ma- terials via light-matter interactions.Progress in Surface Science, 98(2):100705, 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Tobias Weitz, Daniel M. B. Lesko, Simon Wittigschlager, Weizhe Li, Christian Heide, Ofer Neufeld, and Peter Hommelhoff. Lightwave-driven electrons in a Floquet topological insulator.arXiv, page 2407.17917, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Manipulating the sym- metry of photon-dressed electronic states.Nature Com- munications, 15(1):10535, Dec 2024

    Changhua Bao, Michael Sch¨ uler, Teng Xiao, Fei Wang, Haoyuan Zhong, Tianyun Lin, Xuanxi Cai, Tianshuang Sheng, Xiao Tang, Hongyun Zhang, Pu Yu, Zhiyuan Sun, Wenhui Duan, and Shuyun Zhou. Manipulating the sym- metry of photon-dressed electronic states.Nature Com- munications, 15(1):10535, Dec 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    S. Ito, M. Sch¨ uler, M. Meierhofer, S. Schlauderer, J. Freudenstein, J. Reimann, D. Afanasiev, K. A. Kokh, O. E. Tereshchenko, J. G¨ udde, M. A. Sentef, U. H¨ ofer, and R. Huber. Build-up and dephasing of Floquet-Bloch bands on subcycle timescales.Nature, 616(7958):696– 701, Apr 2023

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Band nonlinearity- enabled manipulation of Dirac nodes, Weyl cones, and valleytronics with intense linearly polarized light.Nano Lett., 23(16):7568–7575, Nov 2024

    Ofer Neufeld, Hannes H¨ ubener, Gregor Jotzu, Umberto De Giovannini, and Angel Rubio. Band nonlinearity- enabled manipulation of Dirac nodes, Weyl cones, and valleytronics with intense linearly polarized light.Nano Lett., 23(16):7568–7575, Nov 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Floquet-Bloch valleytronics.Nature Communications, 16(1):5799, July 2025

    Sotirios Fragkos, Baptiste Fabre, Olena Tkach, St´ ephane Petit, Dominique Descamps, Gerd Sch¨ onhense, Yann Mairesse, Michael Sch¨ uler, and Samuel Beaulieu. Floquet-Bloch valleytronics.Nature Communications, 16(1):5799, July 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Observation of Floquet–Bloch states in monolayer graphene.Nature Physics, May 2025

    Dongsung Choi, Masataka Mogi, Umberto De Giovan- nini, Doron Azoury, Baiqing Lv, Yifan Su, Hannes H¨ ubener, Angel Rubio, and Nuh Gedik. Observation of Floquet–Bloch states in monolayer graphene.Nature Physics, May 2025

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Manmana, Michael A

    Marco Merboldt, Michael Sch¨ uler, David Schmitt, Jan Philipp Bange, Wiebke Bennecke, Karun Gadge, Klaus Pierz, Hans Werner Schumacher, Davood Momeni, Daniel Steil, Salvatore R. Manmana, Michael A. Sentef, Marcel Reutzel, and Stefan Mathias. Observation of Flo- quet states in graphene.Nature Physics, May 2025

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Interference in Floquet-Volkov transi- tions.Physical Review A, 90(1):013420, July 2014

    Sang Tae Park. Interference in Floquet-Volkov transi- tions.Physical Review A, 90(1):013420, July 2014

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Floquet-Volkov interference in a semiconductor

    Changhua Bao, Haoyuan Zhong, Benshu Fan, Xuanxi Cai, Fei Wang, Shaohua Zhou, Tianyun Lin, Hongyun Zhang, Pu Yu, Peizhe Tang, Wenhui Duan, and Shuyun Zhou. Floquet-Volkov interference in a semiconductor. Physical Review B, 111(8):L081106, February 2025

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Sen- 16 tef, Marcel Reutzel, Stefan Mathias, and Salvatore R

    Karun Gadge, Marco Merboldt, Michael Sch¨ uler, Jan Philipp Bange, Wiebke Bennecke, Michael A. Sen- 16 tef, Marcel Reutzel, Stefan Mathias, and Salvatore R. Manmana. A comparative study of perturbative and nonequilibrium Green’s function approaches for Floquet sidebands in periodically driven quantum systems.arXiv,

    work page

  32. [32]

    Mishra, Christina M¨ oller, Wiebke Bennecke, G

    Marius Keunecke, Marcel Reutzel, David Schmitt, Alexander Osterkorn, Tridev A. Mishra, Christina M¨ oller, Wiebke Bennecke, G. S. Matthijs Jansen, Daniel Steil, Salvatore R. Manmana, Sabine Steil, Stefan Kehrein, and Stefan Mathias. Electromagnetic dress- ing of the electron energy spectrum of Au(111) at high momenta.Physical Review B, 102(16):161403, Oct...

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Lukas Wenthaus, Nikolay M. Kabachnik, Mario Borg- wardt, Steffen Palutke, Dmytro Kutnyakhov, Federico Pressacco, Markus Scholz, Dmitrii Potorochin, Nils Wind, Stefan D¨ usterer, G¨ unter Brenner, Oliver Gessner, Serguei Molodtsov, Wolfgang Eberhardt, and Friedrich Roth. Insights into the laser-assisted photoelectric effect from solid-state surfaces.Physic...

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Light-induced ultrafast glide-mirror symmetry breaking in black phosphorus

    Changhua Bao, Fei Wang, Haoyuan Zhong, Shaohua Zhou, Tianyun Lin, Hongyun Zhang, Xuanxi Cai, Wen- hui Duan, and Shuyun Zhou. Light-induced ultrafast glide-mirror symmetry breaking in black phosphorus. ACS Nano, 18(46):32038–32044, Nov 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Floquet optical selection rules in black phosphorus

    Benshu Fan, Umberto De Giovannini, Hannes H¨ ubener, Shuyun Zhou, Wenhui Duan, Angel Rubio, and Peizhe Tang. Floquet optical selection rules in black phosphorus. Science Advances, 11(34):eadw2744, August 2025

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Kin Fai Mak, Keliang He, Jie Shan, and Tony F. Heinz. Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by opti- cal helicity.Nature Nanotechnology, 7(8):494–498, 2012

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    Valley polarization in MoS 2 monolayers by optical pumping.Nature Nanotechnology, 7(8):490– 493, 2012

    Hualing Zeng, Junfeng Dai, Wang Yao, Di Xiao, and Xiaodong Cui. Valley polarization in MoS 2 monolayers by optical pumping.Nature Nanotechnology, 7(8):490– 493, 2012

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    Valley-selective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide.Nature Communications, 3(1):887, Jun 2012

    Ting Cao, Gang Wang, Wenpeng Han, Huiqi Ye, Chuan- rui Zhu, Junren Shi, Qian Niu, Pingheng Tan, Enge Wang, Baoli Liu, and Ji Feng. Valley-selective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide.Nature Communications, 3(1):887, Jun 2012

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Ziegler, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Alexey Chernikov, Martin Wolf, Laurenz Rettig, Ralph Ernstorfer, and Michael Sch¨ uler

    Samuel Beaulieu, Shuo Dong, Viktor Christiansson, Philipp Werner, Tommaso Pincelli, Jonas D. Ziegler, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Alexey Chernikov, Martin Wolf, Laurenz Rettig, Ralph Ernstorfer, and Michael Sch¨ uler. Berry curvature signatures in chirop- tical excitonic transitions.Sci. Adv., 10(26):eadk3897, Jun 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Time- and polarization-resolved extreme ultraviolet momentum microscopy.Review of Scientific Instruments, 96(11):115201, November 2025

    Sotirios Fragkos, Quentin Courtade, Olena Tkach, J´ erˆ ome Gaudin, Dominique Descamps, Guillaume Bar- rette, St´ ephane Petit, Gerd Sch¨ onhense, Yann Mairesse, and Samuel Beaulieu. Time- and polarization-resolved extreme ultraviolet momentum microscopy.Review of Scientific Instruments, 96(11):115201, November 2025

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Tkach, S

    O. Tkach, S. Fragkos, D. Biswas, J. Liu, O. Fedchenko, Y. Lytvynenko, S. Babenkov, D. Zimmer, Q. L. Nguyen, S. Chernov, D. Kutnyakhov, M. Scholz, N. Wind, A. Gloskovskii, F. Pressacco, J. Dilling, L. Bruckmeier, M. Heber, L. Wenthaus, G. Brenner, D. Puntel, P. E. Majchrzak, D. Liu, F. Scholz, J. A. Sobota, J. D. Ko- ralek, G. Dakovski, A. Mehta, N. Sirica...

    work page 2026

  42. [42]

    Multimode objective lens for momentum microscopy and XPEEM: Theory.Ul- tramicroscopy, 276:114167, 2025

    Olena Tkach and Gerd Sch¨ onhense. Multimode objective lens for momentum microscopy and XPEEM: Theory.Ul- tramicroscopy, 276:114167, 2025

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Ul- trafast polarization-tunable monochromatic extreme ultraviolet source at high-repetition-rate.Journal of Optics, 24(8):084003, June 2022

    Antoine Comby, Debobrata Rajak, Dominique Descamps, St´ ephane Petit, Val´ erie Blanchet, Yann Mairesse, J´ erome Gaudin, and Samuel Beaulieu. Ul- trafast polarization-tunable monochromatic extreme ultraviolet source at high-repetition-rate.Journal of Optics, 24(8):084003, June 2022

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Plasmonics of Au nanoparticles in a hot thermodynamic bath.Nanoscale, 11:1140–1146, 2019

    Michele Magnozzi, Marzia Ferrera, Lorenzo Mattera, Maurizio Canepa, and Francesco Bisio. Plasmonics of Au nanoparticles in a hot thermodynamic bath.Nanoscale, 11:1140–1146, 2019

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Determining the Out-of-Plane Longitu- dinal Sound Speed in GeS by Broadband Time-Domain Brillouin Scattering.ACS Omega, 9(13):15463–15467, March 2024

    Watheq Al-Basheer, Christian Viernes, Meixin Cheng, Ruofei Zheng, Sam Netzke, Kostyantyn Pichugin, and German Sciaini. Determining the Out-of-Plane Longitu- dinal Sound Speed in GeS by Broadband Time-Domain Brillouin Scattering.ACS Omega, 9(13):15463–15467, March 2024

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    An- tosiewicz, and Timur O

    Battulga Munkhbat, Piotr Wr´ obel, Tomasz J. An- tosiewicz, and Timur O. Shegai. Optical Constants of Several Multilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Measured by Spectroscopic Ellipsometry in the 300–1700 nm Range: High Index, Anisotropy, and Hyperbolicity. ACS Photonics, 9(7):2398–2407, July 2022

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Layers engineering optoelec- tronic properties of 2D hexagonal GeS materials.Phys- ica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 133:114791, September 2021

    Abdelmajid El-Bakkali, Siham Sadki, Lalla Btissam Drissi, and Faycal Djeffal. Layers engineering optoelec- tronic properties of 2D hexagonal GeS materials.Phys- ica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 133:114791, September 2021

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Mamedov, and Ekmel Ozbay

    Husnu Koc, Sevket Simsek, Selami Palaz, Oral Oltulu, Amirullah M. Mamedov, and Ekmel Ozbay. Mechanical, electronic, and optical properties of the A 4 B6 layered ferroelectrics:ab initiocalculation.physica status solidi c, 12(6):651–658, June 2015

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Mehdi Arfaoui, Natalia Zawadzka, Sabrine Ayari, Zhao- long Chen, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Adam Babi´ nski, Maciej Koperski, Sihem Jaziri, and Maciej R. Molas. Optical properties of orthorhombic germanium sulfide: unveiling the anisotropic nature of Wannier ex- citons.Nanoscale, 15(42):17014–17028, 2023

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Venghaus and U

    H. Venghaus and U. B¨ uchner. The dielectric function of GeS single crystals determined by electron energy loss spectroscopy.physica status solidi (b), 72(2):603–607, December 1975

    work page 1975

  51. [51]

    R. E. Banai, L. A. Burton, S. G. Choi, F. Hofherr, T. Sorgenfrei, A. Walsh, B. To, A. Cr¨ oll, and J. R. S. Brownson. Ellipsometric characterization and density- functional theory analysis of anisotropic optical proper- ties of single-crystalα-SnS.Journal of Applied Physics, 116(1):013511, July 2014

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    Temperature dependence of the dielectric function and critical points ofα-SnS from 27 to 350 K.Scientific Reports, 10(1):18396, October 2020

    Hoang Tung Nguyen, Van Long Le, Thi Minh Hai Nguyen, Tae Jung Kim, Xuan Au Nguyen, Bogyu Kim, Kyujin Kim, Wonjun Lee, Sunglae Cho, and Young Dong Kim. Temperature dependence of the dielectric function and critical points ofα-SnS from 27 to 350 K.Scientific Reports, 10(1):18396, October 2020

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    DFT study of the structural, electronic, and optical properties of bulk, monolayer, and 17 bilayer Sn-monochalcogenides.Applied Surface Science Advances, 11:100275, October 2022

    Attia Batool, Youqi Zhu, Xilan Ma, Muhammad Imran Saleem, and Chuanbao Cao. DFT study of the structural, electronic, and optical properties of bulk, monolayer, and 17 bilayer Sn-monochalcogenides.Applied Surface Science Advances, 11:100275, October 2022

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Miwa, Michele Zac- chigna, Cephise Cacho, Richard T

    Søren Ulstrup, Jens Christian Johannsen, Federico Cilento, Alberto Crepaldi, Jill A. Miwa, Michele Zac- chigna, Cephise Cacho, Richard T. Chapman, Emma Springate, Felix Fromm, Christian Raidel, Thomas Seyller, Phil D. C. King, Fulvio Parmigiani, Marco Gri- oni, and Philip Hofmann. Ramifications of optical pump- ing on the interpretation of time-resolved p...

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    Singh, J

    S. Singh, J. R. Potopowicz, L. G. Van Uitert, and S. H. Wemple. Nonlinear Optical Properties of Hexagonal Sil- icon Carbide.Applied Physics Letters, 19(3):53–56, Au- gust 1971

    work page 1971

  56. [56]

    Stephen V. Pepper. Optical Analysis of Photoemission. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 60(6):805, June 1970

    work page 1970

  57. [57]

    Neivandt, Michelle L

    David J. Neivandt, Michelle L. Gee, Michael L. Hair, and Carl P. Tripp. Polarized Infrared Attenuated Total Re- flection for the in Situ Determination of the Orientation of Surfactant Adsorbed at the Solid/Solution Interface. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 102(26):5107– 5114, June 1998

    work page 1998

  58. [58]

    Allan Holmgren and Xiaofang Yang. A Polarized Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry Attenuated Total Re- flection Study of Bentonite Settled onto Magnetite.The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 112(42):16609–16615, October 2008

    work page 2008

  59. [59]

    S. V. Pepper. Enhanced Photoemission by Attenuated Total Reflection.Applied Optics, 8(8):1747, August 1969

    work page 1969

  60. [60]

    Dielectric Screening in Electro- magnetic Dressing of Semiconductors [dataset], January 2026.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18328301

    Quentin Courtade, Umberto Dellasette, Sotirios Fragkos, Stephane Petit, Dominique Descamps, Yann Mairesse, and Samuel Beaulieu. Dielectric Screening in Electro- magnetic Dressing of Semiconductors [dataset], January 2026.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18328301

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.18328301 2026