pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.22641 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · nucl-th

Universality in spacetime ω modes of quarkyonic stars

D. Dey , Jeet Amrit Pattnaik , R. N. Panda , S. K. Patra This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 19:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE nucl-th
keywords quarkyonic starsomega modesuniversal relationsneutron star oscillationsgravitational wavesequation of staterelativistic mean field
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quarkyonic stars produce distinct ω-mode frequencies that obey approximate universal relations independent of the equation of state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models compact stars with a quarkyonic core surrounded by a hadronic mantle, using relativistic mean-field theory with G3 and IOPB-I sets. It computes the complex frequencies of the fundamental and first excited ω modes in full general relativity via the phase-amplitude method. The resulting spectrum is shown to differ from both pure hadronic and hybrid-star cases, with frequencies and damping times set by the stiffening effect of the quarkyonic component. The frequencies themselves are found to lie on approximate universal curves that hold across variations in transition density and confinement scale.

Core claim

Quarkyonic stars exhibit a unique ω-mode signature whose frequencies follow approximate universal relations that are largely independent of the specific equation of state.

What carries the argument

The quarkyonic-matter model (with transition density nt and confinement scale Λcs) inside a multicomponent stellar interior, solved for complex eigenfrequencies by the phase-amplitude method in full general relativity.

If this is right

  • The admixed quarkyonic structure shifts both real frequencies and damping times relative to hadronic or hybrid stars.
  • Universal relations permit EOS-independent predictions for the ω-mode spectrum once mass and radius are fixed.
  • Current mass-radius constraints are already satisfied while still producing the reported mode universality.
  • The spectrum remains degenerate across the two RMF parameterizations once nt and Λcs are varied within allowed ranges.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future gravitational-wave detectors could use these universal curves to test for the presence of quarkyonic matter without needing the exact microphysical parameters.
  • The same universality might appear in other hybrid compositions if the core-mantle transition produces comparable stiffness changes.
  • Extending the calculation to higher-order modes could reveal whether the universality persists or breaks at shorter wavelengths.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen RMF parameter sets together with the selected transition density and confinement scale correctly reproduce the multicomponent interior and yield oscillation modes that the phase-amplitude method computes accurately.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of ω-mode frequencies from a neutron-star merger that deviates from the reported universal curves or matches the spectrum of a purely hadronic star instead.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.22641 by D. Dey, Jeet Amrit Pattnaik, R. N. Panda, S. K. Patra.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Mass-radius relations for baryonic and quarkyonic neutron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Squared sound speed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The dimensionless [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The dimensionless [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the corresponding damping times τ of the ω modes as functions of stellar mass. It provides complemen￾tary information to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: illustrates an empirical representation of the ω mode spectrum in terms of scaled (dimensionless) combina￾tions of the real and imaginary parts of the complex eigenfre￾quency, expressed through the mode frequency f and damp￾ing time τ [99]. Following the definitions used in [97], we [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The variation of fundamental ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The variation of fundamental ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The plotted quantities are logarithms of the scaled real [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The gravitational wave $\omega$ mode spectrum presents a unique window into the dense interior of neutron stars, probing physics inaccessible to electromagnetic observations. This work investigates the $\omega$ modes of compact stars composed of quarkyonic matter. The quarkyonic model, which describes a cross-over transition between nucleonic and quark matter treated as quasi-particles, is formulated within the Relativistic Mean-Field (RMF) theory using the G3 and IOPB-I parameterizations. This core is surrounded by a mantle of hadronic matter, creating a multicomponent stellar interior. The overall Equation of State (EOS) is governed by two key parameters: the transition density ($n_t$), the QCD confinement scale ($\Lambda_{\rm cs}$), which are varied to construct models consistent with current astrophysical constraints on mass and radius. We compute the complex eigenfrequencies (damped oscillations) of the fundamental and first excited $\omega$ modes using the phase-amplitude method within a full general relativistic framework. Our simulations reveal that the admixed quarkyonic structure produces a unique $\omega$ mode signature, distinctly different from pure hadronic or hybrid stars. The spectrum exhibits a strong, degenerate dependence on the EOS, where the stiffening effect of the quarkyonic matter influences oscillation frequencies and damping times in a characteristic manner. We also demonstrate that $\omega$ mode frequencies for quarkyonic stars follow approximate universal relations, largely independent of the EOS.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs models of quarkyonic stars within RMF theory using the G3 and IOPB-I parameter sets, with the transition density nt and confinement scale Λcs varied to satisfy current mass-radius constraints. It computes the complex eigenfrequencies of the fundamental and first-overtone ω modes via the phase-amplitude method in full general relativity and reports that these modes display a signature distinct from purely hadronic or hybrid stars while obeying approximate universal relations that are largely independent of the specific EOS.

Significance. If the reported universality survives broader validation, the result would supply a potentially observable gravitational-wave signature capable of distinguishing quarkyonic matter from other dense-matter phases, thereby linking microscopic QCD-inspired modeling to future multimessenger data. The explicit use of two established RMF functionals and continuous parameter variation to remain within observational bounds is a constructive feature of the approach.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results section: the central claim that ω-mode frequencies follow approximate universal relations 'largely independent of the EOS' is demonstrated only within a two-parameter family (nt, Λcs) sampled from two RMF sets (G3, IOPB-I); no quantitative measure of residual scatter versus nt or Λcs, nor comparison against an independent EOS construction outside this family, is provided, leaving open the possibility that the apparent degeneracy is internal to the chosen parameterization.
  2. [Numerical Methods] Numerical Methods section: the phase-amplitude integration across the density discontinuity at nt is not accompanied by convergence tests, error bars on the reported complex frequencies, or cross-validation against an independent solver (shooting or finite-difference) that enforces identical junction conditions; without these, the accuracy of the eigenfrequencies that underlie the universality claim cannot be assessed.
  3. [Model Construction] Model Construction: nt and Λcs are explicitly tuned to produce stellar models consistent with astrophysical mass-radius constraints before the universality test is performed; this selection procedure restricts the sampled EOS space and introduces a potential circularity that must be quantified (e.g., by showing the relations for untuned parameter values or for a wider ensemble) before the independence from EOS can be asserted.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states both a 'strong, degenerate dependence on the EOS' and 'largely independent of the EOS'; this apparent tension should be clarified with explicit wording in the introduction and results.
  2. Notation for the real and imaginary parts of the complex frequency (ω) should be defined once at first use and used consistently in all figures and tables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions planned for the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results section: the central claim that ω-mode frequencies follow approximate universal relations 'largely independent of the EOS' is demonstrated only within a two-parameter family (nt, Λcs) sampled from two RMF sets (G3, IOPB-I); no quantitative measure of residual scatter versus nt or Λcs, nor comparison against an independent EOS construction outside this family, is provided, leaving open the possibility that the apparent degeneracy is internal to the chosen parameterization.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative measures of scatter would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit quantification of residual scatter in the universal relations as functions of nt and Λcs for both G3 and IOPB-I. The study is confined to the quarkyonic RMF framework; a comparison with entirely independent EOS constructions lies outside the present scope, but we will add a discussion of this limitation and note that the reported relations already hold across two distinct RMF parameterizations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical Methods] Numerical Methods section: the phase-amplitude integration across the density discontinuity at nt is not accompanied by convergence tests, error bars on the reported complex frequencies, or cross-validation against an independent solver (shooting or finite-difference) that enforces identical junction conditions; without these, the accuracy of the eigenfrequencies that underlie the universality claim cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We accept that numerical validation is required. The revised version will include convergence tests for the phase-amplitude integration across the discontinuity at nt, reported error estimates on the complex eigenfrequencies, and cross-validation against an independent shooting-method implementation that enforces the same junction conditions. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Model Construction] Model Construction: nt and Λcs are explicitly tuned to produce stellar models consistent with astrophysical mass-radius constraints before the universality test is performed; this selection procedure restricts the sampled EOS space and introduces a potential circularity that must be quantified (e.g., by showing the relations for untuned parameter values or for a wider ensemble) before the independence from EOS can be asserted.

    Authors: The parameters are varied only within ranges that yield observationally viable stars because unphysical models are not relevant to the astrophysical context. To quantify any selection effect, the revised manuscript will present the universal relations for a broader ensemble of untuned (nt, Λcs) values, demonstrating that the approximate universality persists beyond the strictly constrained subset while clarifying that the primary results concern observationally consistent models. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

ω-mode universality shown within EOS family tuned via nt and Λcs to mass-radius constraints

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "the overall Equation of State (EOS) is governed by two key parameters: the transition density (nt), the QCD confinement scale (Λcs), which are varied to construct models consistent with current astrophysical constraints on mass and radius. [...] We also demonstrate that ω mode frequencies for quarkyonic stars follow approximate universal relations, largely independent of the EOS."

    nt and Λcs are varied precisely so the resulting stellar models obey observed mass-radius limits; the universality relations are then measured and reported for frequencies computed on exactly those tuned models. The independence is therefore internal to the fitted two-parameter family rather than a prediction outside it.

full rationale

The central claim constructs multicomponent EOS by varying the two transition parameters to satisfy external mass-radius bounds, then extracts and presents the ω-mode frequencies as following approximate universal relations independent of EOS. This reduces the reported universality to an observed property of the restricted, already-constrained family rather than an independent first-principles result across broader EOS space. The phase-amplitude computation itself is not shown to collapse by definition, but the sampling and labeling create moderate circularity burden.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the RMF description of quarkyonic matter, the phase-amplitude method for mode calculation, and the assumption that varying nt and Λcs produces physically valid stellar models.

free parameters (2)
  • transition density nt
    Varied to construct models consistent with current astrophysical constraints on mass and radius
  • QCD confinement scale Λcs
    Varied together with nt to control the quarkyonic transition
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Relativistic Mean-Field theory with G3 and IOPB-I parameterizations correctly describes quarkyonic matter as quasi-particles
    Used to formulate the core EOS
  • domain assumption The phase-amplitude method yields accurate complex eigenfrequencies for ω modes in full general relativity
    Employed for all mode computations
invented entities (1)
  • quarkyonic matter treated as quasi-particles no independent evidence
    purpose: To realize a cross-over transition between nucleonic and quark degrees of freedom
    Postulated within the RMF framework without independent falsifiable prediction supplied in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5575 in / 1504 out tokens · 54734 ms · 2026-05-15T19:20:44.860151+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. B. Demorest, T. Pennucci, S. M. Ransom, M. S. E. Roberts, and J. W. T. Hessels, Nature467, 1081–1083 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary

    J. Antoniadis, P. C. C. Freire, et al., Science340(2013), 10.1126/science.1233232

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1233232 2013

  3. [3]

    H. T. Cromartie, E. Fonseca, S. M. Ransom, P. B. Demorest, Z. Arzoumanian, et al., Nature Astronomy4, 72–76 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    R. W. Romani, D. Kandel, A. V . Filippenko, T. G. Brink, and W. Zheng, The Astrophysical Journal Letters934, L17 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, et al., APJL887, L21 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, and other, The Astrophysical Journal Letters887, L24 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, et al., The Astro- physical Journal Letters918, L28 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ack- ley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, and A. et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collabora- tion), Phys. Rev. X9, 011001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    S. De, D. Finstad, J. M. Lattimer, D. A. Brown, E. Berger, and C. M. Biwer, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 091102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, et al. (The LIGO Sci- entific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    C. D. Capano, I. Tews, S. M. Brown, B. Margalit, S. De, S. Ku- mar, D. A. Brown, B. Krishnan, and S. Reddy, Nature Astron- omy4, 625 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, and A. Vuorinen, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 172703 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Burrows, Nature403, 727 (2000)

    A. Burrows, Nature403, 727 (2000)

    work page 2000

  14. [14]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, Science304, 536 (2004)

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, Phys. Reports442, 109 (2007), the Hans Bethe Centennial V olume 1906-2006

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    R. C. Tolman, Phys. Rev.55, 364 (1939)

    work page 1939

  17. [17]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. V olkoff, Phys. Rev.55, 374 (1939)

    work page 1939

  18. [18]

    Bedaque and A

    P. Bedaque and A. W. Steiner, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 031103 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Masuda, T

    K. Masuda, T. Hatsuda, and T. Takatsuka, Progress of Theo- retical and Experimental Physics2013, 073D01 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Abbott, T

    R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ack- ley, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V . B. Adya, C. Affeldt, M. Agathos, and all, The Astrophysical Journal Letters896, L44 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    E. R. Most, L. J. Papenfort, L. R. Weih, and L. Rezzolla, MNRAS499, L82 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Huang, J

    K. Huang, J. Hu, Y . Zhang, and H. Shen, The Astrophysical Journal904, 39 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Quarkyonic neutron stars as candidates for the gw230529 mass-gap object,

    J. A. Pattnaik and S. K. Patra, “Quarkyonic neutron stars as candidates for the gw230529 mass-gap object,” (2025), arXiv:2511.14266 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    A. G. Abac, R. Abbott, I. e. a. Abouelfettouh, t. V . C. The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, and the KAGRA Collabora- tion, The Astrophysical Journal Letters970, L34 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    F. J. Fattoyev, C. J. Horowitz, J. Piekarewicz, and B. Reed, Phys. Rev. C102, 065805 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    H. Tan, J. Noronha-Hostler, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 261104 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Schaffner-Bielich, Compact Star Physics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2020)

    J. Schaffner-Bielich, Compact Star Physics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, et al., Rept. Prog. Phys.81, 056902 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    N. K. Glendenning, Phys. Rev. D46, 1274 (1992)

    work page 1992

  30. [30]

    Endo, Phys

    T. Endo, Phys. Rev. C83, 068801 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Heinimann, M

    O. Heinimann, M. Hempel, and F.-K. Thielemann, Phys. Rev. D94, 103008 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Komoltsev, Phys

    O. Komoltsev, Phys. Rev. D110, L071502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Komoltsev and A

    O. Komoltsev and A. Kurkela, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 202701 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Lugones and A

    G. Lugones and A. G. Grunfeld, Phys. Rev. D107, 043025 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Fujimoto, K

    Y . Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, K. Hotokezaka, and K. Kyutoku, Phys. Rev. D111, 063054 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Orsaria, H

    M. Orsaria, H. Rodrigues, F. Weber, and G. A. Contrera, Phys. Rev. C89, 015806 (2014). 16

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    McLerran and S

    L. McLerran and S. Reddy, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 122701 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    V . Koch, L. McLerran, G. A. Miller, and V . V ovchenko, Phys. Rev. C110, 025201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    T. K. Jha, P. K. Raina, P. K. Panda, and S. K. Patra, Phys. Rev. C74, 055803 (2006)

    work page 2006

  40. [40]

    B. K. Sharma, P. K. Panda, and S. K. Patra, Phys. Rev. C75, 035808 (2007)

    work page 2007

  41. [41]

    Zhao and J

    T. Zhao and J. M. Lattimer, Phys. Rev. D106, 123002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Walecka, Annals of Physics83, 491 (1974)

    J. Walecka, Annals of Physics83, 491 (1974)

    work page 1974

  43. [43]

    Boguta and A

    J. Boguta and A. Bodmer, Nuclear Physics A292, 413 (1977)

    work page 1977

  44. [44]

    P. G. Reinhard, Reports on Progress in Physics52, 439 (1989)

    work page 1989

  45. [45]

    Horowitz and B

    C. Horowitz and B. D. Serot, Nuclear Physics A368, 503 (1981)

    work page 1981

  46. [46]

    J. A. Pattnaik, M. Bhuyan, R. N. Panda, and S. K. Patra, Phys- ica Scripta96, 125319 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    J. A. Pattnaik, J. T. Majekodunmi, A. Kumar, M. Bhuyan, and S. K. Patra, Phys. Rev. C105, 014318 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    J. A. Pattnaik, R. N. Panda, M. Bhuyan, and S. K. Patra, Chi- nese Physics C46, 094103 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    J. A. Pattnaik, K. C. Naik, R. N. Panda, M. Bhuyan, and S. K. Patra, Pramana97, 136 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Del Estal, M

    M. Del Estal, M. Centelles, X. Vi ˜nas, and S. K. Patra, Phys. Rev. C63, 044321 (2001)

    work page 2001

  51. [51]

    S. K. Patra and C. R. Praharaj, Phys. Rev. C44, 2552 (1991)

    work page 1991

  52. [52]

    Ring, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics37, 193 (1996)

    P. Ring, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics37, 193 (1996)

    work page 1996

  53. [53]

    Dutra, O

    M. Dutra, O. Lourenc ¸o, S. S. Avancini,et al., Phys. Rev. C90, 055203 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Kumar, S

    B. Kumar, S. Singh, B. Agrawal, and S. Patra, Nuclear Physics A966, 197 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Kumar, S

    B. Kumar, S. K. Patra, and B. K. Agrawal, Phys. Rev. C97, 045806 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    D. Dey, J. A. Pattnaik, H. Das, A. Kumar, R. Panda, and S. Pa- tra, JCAP2025, 056 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    D. Dey, J. A. Pattnaik, M. Bhuyan, R. N. Panda, and S. K. Patra, JCAP2025, 003 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Andersson and K

    N. Andersson and K. D. Kokkotas, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4134 (1996)

    work page 1996

  59. [59]

    L. K. Tsui, P. T. Leung, and J. Wu, Phys. Rev. D74, 124025 (2006)

    work page 2006

  60. [60]

    Allen, N

    G. Allen, N. Andersson, K. D. Kokkotas, and B. F. Schutz, Phys. Rev. D58, 124012 (1998)

    work page 1998

  61. [61]

    Bernuzzi, A

    S. Bernuzzi, A. Nagar, T. Dietrich, and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 161103 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    Chatziioannou, J

    K. Chatziioannou, J. A. Clark, A. Bauswein, M. Millhouse, T. B. Littenberg, and N. Cornish, Phys. Rev. D96, 124035 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. F. Schutz, MNRAS255, 119 (1992)

    work page 1992

  64. [64]

    Leins, H

    M. Leins, H. P. Nollert, and M. H. Soffel, Phys. Rev. D48, 3467 (1993)

    work page 1993

  65. [65]

    L. K. Tsui and P. T. Leung, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society357, 1029 (2005)

    work page 2005

  66. [66]

    Andersson and K

    N. Andersson and K. D. Kokkotas, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society299, 1059 (1998)

    work page 1998

  67. [67]

    K. D. Kokkotas, J. Ruoff, and N. Andersson, Phys. Rev. D70, 043003 (2004)

    work page 2004

  68. [68]

    Andersson, K

    N. Andersson, K. D. Kokkotas, and B. F. Schutz, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society280, 1230 (1996)

    work page 1996

  69. [69]

    Chandrasekhar and V

    S. Chandrasekhar and V . Ferrari, Proceedings of the Royal So- ciety of London Series A432, 247 (1991)

    work page 1991

  70. [70]

    Benhar, V

    O. Benhar, V . Ferrari, and L. Gualtieri, Phys. Rev. D70, 124015 (2004)

    work page 2004

  71. [71]

    Martynov, H

    D. Martynov, H. Miao, and Y . et. al., Phys. Rev. D99, 102004 (2019)

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    D. D. Doneva, E. Gaertig, K. D. Kokkotas, and C. Kr ¨uger, Phys. Rev. D88, 044052 (2013)

    work page 2013

  73. [73]

    Chirenti, G

    C. Chirenti, G. H. de Souza, and W. Kastaun, Phys. Rev. D 91, 044034 (2015)

    work page 2015

  74. [74]

    Vylet, S

    K. Vylet, S. Ajith, K. Yagi, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D109, 024054 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    Fujimoto, K

    Y . Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, K. Hotokezaka, and K. Kyutoku, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 091404 (2023)

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957)

    work page 1957

  77. [77]

    E. W. Leaver, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A402, 285 (1985)

    work page 1985

  78. [78]

    Nollert and B

    H.-P. Nollert and B. G. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D45, 2617 (1992)

    work page 1992

  79. [79]

    Leins, H.-P

    M. Leins, H.-P. Nollert, and M. H. Soffel, Physical Review D 48, 3467 (1993)

    work page 1993

  80. [80]

    Rel- ativistic nuclear many-body theory,

    B. D. Serot and J. D. Walecka, “Rel- ativistic nuclear many-body theory,” in Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories: V olume 3, edited by T. L. Ainsworth, C. E. Campbell, B. E. Clements, and E. Krotscheck (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1992) pp. 49–92

    work page 1992

Showing first 80 references.