pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.03702 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall

Contribution of remote bands to orbital magnetization in twisted bilayer graphene

Pinzhuo Li , Kun Jiang , Ziqiang Wang , Jian Kang , Yi Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 17:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords twisted bilayer grapheneorbital magnetizationremote bandsHartree-Fock approximationChern insulatorsmoiré systemsinteger fillings
0
0 comments X

The pith

Orbital magnetization in twisted bilayer graphene draws substantial contributions from remote bands, unlike topological invariants such as the Chern number.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a gauge-invariant method based on the projector formulation to compute orbital magnetization M_orb and self-rotation m_SR directly from the Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian for correlated phases in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. It demonstrates that both quantities receive large contributions from remote bands, making convergence with band number essential. This approach is then used to obtain values for time-reversal broken Chern insulators at fillings ±3 and other competing phases at integer fillings. A sympathetic reader would care because accurate magnetic response calculations are needed to connect theory with experiments on moiré materials.

Core claim

Using the projector formulation of orbital magnetization theory within the self-consistent Hartree-Fock approximation, the orbital magnetization M_orb and self-rotation contribution m_SR for correlated phases at integer fillings in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene obtain substantial contributions from remote bands. This stands in contrast to the Chern number, which remains unaffected by remote bands, and thus requires careful convergence with respect to the number of included bands to yield reliable results for time-reversal symmetry broken Chern insulating states at ν=±3 and competing phases at other fillings.

What carries the argument

Projector formulation of the theory of orbital magnetization applied directly to the Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian to compute M_orb and m_SR in a gauge-invariant way.

If this is right

  • Converged values of orbital magnetization for Chern insulating states at ν=±3 can be obtained.
  • Orbital magnetization for competing correlated phases at other integer fillings can be evaluated reliably.
  • A systematic approach is established for computing orbital magnetization in correlated moiré systems.
  • Remote bands must be included to accurately determine the magnetic response in these systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar remote band effects may appear in calculations of other response functions like magnetic susceptibility in flat-band systems.
  • Experimental measurements of orbital magnetization in twisted bilayer graphene could be used to test the convergence behavior predicted here.
  • Truncating to only flat bands in models might systematically underestimate or misrepresent magnetic properties in moiré materials.

Load-bearing premise

The self-consistent Hartree-Fock approximation captures the essential physics of the correlated phases at integer fillings sufficiently well for the computed orbital magnetization to be meaningful.

What would settle it

A direct computation or experimental observation demonstrating that orbital magnetization converges rapidly with only a few remote bands included would falsify the claim of substantial remote band contributions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.03702 by Jian Kang, Kun Jiang, Pinzhuo Li, Yi Zhang, Ziqiang Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Low-energy band structure of non-interacting TBG cal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a). Because the staggered potential preserves time￾reversal symmetry, the orbital magnetizations in the two val￾leys remain equal in magnitude and opposite in sign, such that the total orbital magnetization vanishes. We therefore restrict our analysis to the τ = − valley and evaluate Morb within this sector. The self-rotation contribution mSR is not evaluated in this case, as it is logarithmic divergent i… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Calculated total orbital magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a,b) HF band dispersions of the correlated Chern insulat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Motivated by recent theoretical and experimental works on orbital magnetization $M_{\mathrm{orb}}$ for the interacting system, we develop a gauge-invariant framework to compute $M_{\mathrm{orb}}$ for correlated phases of magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene within self-consistent Hartree-Fock approximation. Based on the projector formulation of the theory of orbital magnetization, we evaluate both $M_{\mathrm{orb}}$ and the self-rotation contribution $m_{\mathrm{SR}}$ directly from the Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian. We demonstrate that, in contrast to topological invariants such as the Chern number, both $M_{\mathrm{orb}}$ and $m_{\mathrm{SR}}$ obtain substantial contributions from remote bands and thus require careful convergence with respect to the number of included remote bands. Applying this approach to correlated phases at integer fillings, we obtain converged $M_{\mathrm{orb}}$ and $m_{\mathrm{SR}}$ for time reversal symmetry broken Chern insulating states at $\nu=\pm3$ and for competing correlated phases at other integer fillings. Our results establish a systematic and controlled approach for evaluating orbital magnetization in correlated moir\'e systems and clarify the crucial role of remote bands in determining their magnetic response.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a gauge-invariant projector-based framework to compute orbital magnetization M_orb and the self-rotation contribution m_SR directly from the self-consistent Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian for correlated phases in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. It demonstrates that, unlike the Chern number, both M_orb and m_SR receive substantial contributions from remote bands and therefore require explicit convergence checks with respect to the number of included bands. The approach is applied to integer fillings, yielding converged values for time-reversal-symmetry-broken Chern insulators at ν=±3 and for competing phases at other fillings.

Significance. If the convergence with respect to remote bands is rigorously established, the work supplies a controlled, systematic method for evaluating orbital magnetization in interacting moiré systems. The direct use of the Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian via projectors avoids fitting parameters and provides a concrete route to connect microscopic calculations to measurable magnetic responses. This addresses a practical gap between topological invariants (which converge quickly) and orbital magnetization (which does not), and the results for ν=±3 states offer falsifiable predictions for experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods / Numerical implementation] The central convergence claim rests on the assumption that the self-consistent Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian is already converged with respect to the same band cutoff used for the magnetization sum. Because the HF potential is generated by summing over occupied states within the chosen cutoff, increasing the number of remote bands simultaneously modifies both the single-particle Hamiltonian and the projector in the orbital-magnetization formula. The manuscript should include an explicit check (e.g., a table or figure in the numerical-methods or results section) showing the variation of the HF energy, potential matrix elements, or M_orb itself as the cutoff is increased from, say, 4 to 20 bands per valley; without this, the reported “converged” values remain vulnerable to basis-size effects.
  2. [Results for integer fillings] For the competing correlated phases at fillings other than ν=±3, the manuscript reports M_orb and m_SR but does not state whether these phases remain stable when the remote-band cutoff is enlarged. A load-bearing test would be to recompute the self-consistent HF solution at the largest cutoff used for magnetization and verify that the same phase (e.g., valley-polarized or intervalley-coherent) is recovered; otherwise the comparison between phases may mix cutoff artifacts with physical differences.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that “converged M_orb and m_SR” are obtained but supplies no numerical values, error bars, or cutoff numbers; adding a short table or sentence with the final converged numbers and the minimal cutoff required would improve readability.
  2. [Theory section] Notation for the self-rotation term m_SR is introduced without an explicit equation linking it to the orbital-magnetization formula; a one-line definition in the theory section would clarify the decomposition.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive suggestions on numerical convergence. We address both major comments below by adding explicit checks; the revised manuscript incorporates these data to strengthen the robustness claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods / Numerical implementation] The central convergence claim rests on the assumption that the self-consistent Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian is already converged with respect to the same band cutoff used for the magnetization sum. Because the HF potential is generated by summing over occupied states within the chosen cutoff, increasing the number of remote bands simultaneously modifies both the single-particle Hamiltonian and the projector in the orbital-magnetization formula. The manuscript should include an explicit check (e.g., a table or figure in the numerical-methods or results section) showing the variation of the HF energy, potential matrix elements, or M_orb itself as the cutoff is increased from, say, 4 to 20 bands per valley; without this, the reported “converged” values remain vulnerable to basis-size effects.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of simultaneous convergence of the HF Hamiltonian and the magnetization is necessary. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Sec. II.C) containing a table that reports the HF energy per moiré cell, representative off-diagonal potential matrix elements, and the computed M_orb for band cutoffs ranging from 4 to 20 bands per valley. The table shows that both the HF energy and M_orb stabilize to within <1% for cutoffs ≥12 bands; the values quoted in the main text correspond to the 20-band cutoff. This additional data directly addresses the concern that the projector and the self-consistent potential must be treated at the same cutoff. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results for integer fillings] For the competing correlated phases at fillings other than ν=±3, the manuscript reports M_orb and m_SR but does not state whether these phases remain stable when the remote-band cutoff is enlarged. A load-bearing test would be to recompute the self-consistent HF solution at the largest cutoff used for magnetization and verify that the same phase (e.g., valley-polarized or intervalley-coherent) is recovered; otherwise the comparison between phases may mix cutoff artifacts with physical differences.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important clarification. We have performed additional self-consistent HF calculations at the 20-band cutoff for all integer fillings discussed. For the competing phases at ν=0, ±1, ±2 we recover the same valley-polarized and intervalley-coherent ground states that were obtained at the original cutoff; the order-parameter magnitudes change by at most 3% and the relative energies between competing states remain unchanged within the reported precision. A brief paragraph summarizing these stability checks has been added to Sec. III.B, together with a statement that the phase assignments used for the M_orb comparison are robust against the remote-band cutoff. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; orbital magnetization computed directly from HF Hamiltonian with explicit band convergence

full rationale

The derivation evaluates M_orb and m_SR via the projector formulation applied to the self-consistent Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian, then demonstrates remote-band contributions by explicit summation over increasing numbers of bands. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition, and no load-bearing step relies on a self-citation chain that itself assumes the target result. The convergence check is performed by direct computation rather than by construction, making the central claim about remote-band importance independent of the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the projector formulation of orbital magnetization to the Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian and on the assumption that Hartree-Fock captures the relevant correlated phases.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The projector formulation of orbital magnetization theory can be applied directly to the self-consistent Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian.
    Invoked to evaluate both M_orb and m_SR from the HF Hamiltonian.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5521 in / 1245 out tokens · 52942 ms · 2026-05-15T17:16:27.962434+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    #$ 𝑀%&'/𝑁

    They are equiv- alent to−τK 1 and−τK 2 in the moir ´e Brillouin zone (mBZ), as shown in Fig. 1(c). The interlayer tunneling between the Dirac states in the two layers is described by the matrix U= u0 u1 u1 u0 ! + u0 u1e−iτ 2π 3 u1eiτ 2π 3 u0 ! e−iτG1·r + u0 u1eiτ 2π 3 u1e−iτ 2π 3 u0 ! e−iτ(G1+G2)·r (2) whereu 0 andu 1 are the intra- and inter-sublattice i...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Correlated insulator be- haviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices,

    Yuan Cao, Valla Fatemi, Ahmet Demir, Shiang Fang, Spencer L. Tomarken, Jason Y . Luo, Javier D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Efthimios Kaxiras, Ray C. Ashoori, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Correlated insulator be- haviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices,” Nature556, 80–84 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Charge order and broken rotational symmetry in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Yuhang Jiang, Xinyuan Lai, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Kristjan Haule, Jinhai Mao, and Eva Y . Andrei, “Charge order and broken rotational symmetry in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature573, 91–95 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Maximized electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Alexander Kerelsky, Leo J. McGilly, Dante M. Kennes, Lede Xian, Matthew Yankowitz, Shaowen Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, James Hone, Cory Dean, Angel Rubio, and Ab- hay N. Pasupathy, “Maximized electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature572, 95–100 (2019). 7

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Spectroscopic signatures of many- body correlations in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Yonglong Xie, Biao Lian, Berthold J ¨ack, Xiaomeng Liu, Cheng-Li Chiu, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Ali Yazdani, “Spectroscopic signatures of many- body correlations in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Na- ture572, 101–105 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Electronic correlations in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle,

    Youngjoon Choi, Jeannette Kemmer, Yang Peng, Alex Thomson, Harpreet Arora, Robert Polski, Yiran Zhang, Hechen Ren, Jason Alicea, Gil Refael, Felix von Oppen, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Stevan Nadj-Perge, “Electronic correlations in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle,” Nature Physics 15, 1174–1180 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Fractional chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Yonglong Xie, Andrew T. Pierce, Jeong Min Park, Daniel E. Parker, Eslam Khalaf, Patrick Ledwith, Yuan Cao, Seung Hwan Lee, Shaowen Chen, Patrick R. Forrester, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Ashvin Vishwanath, Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, and Amir Yacoby, “Fractional chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature600, 439–443 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Aaron L. Sharpe, Eli J. Fox, Arthur W. Barnard, Joe Finney, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and David Goldhaber-Gordon, “Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene,” Science365, 605–608 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Intrin- sic quantized anomalous hall effect in a moir´e heterostructure,

    M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y . Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, “Intrin- sic quantized anomalous hall effect in a moir´e heterostructure,” Science367, 900–903 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Chern insulators, van hove singularities and topological flat bands in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Shuang Wu, Zhenyuan Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and Eva Y . Andrei, “Chern insulators, van hove singularities and topological flat bands in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature Materials20, 488–494 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Symmetry-broken chern insulators and rashba-like landau-level crossings in magic-angle bilayer graphene,

    Ipsita Das, Xiaobo Lu, Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, Zhi-Da Song, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Dmitri K. Efetov, “Symmetry-broken chern insulators and rashba-like landau-level crossings in magic-angle bilayer graphene,” Nature Physics17, 710–714 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Strongly correlated chern insulators in magic- angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Kevin P. Nuckolls, Myungchul Oh, Dillon Wong, Biao Lian, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Ali Yazdani, “Strongly correlated chern insulators in magic- angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature588, 610–615 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Competing zero-field chern insulators in su- perconducting twisted bilayer graphene,

    Petr Stepanov, Ming Xie, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Xiaobo Lu, Allan H. MacDonald, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Dmitri K. Efetov, “Competing zero-field chern insulators in su- perconducting twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 197701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Correlated hofstadter spectrum and flavour phase di- agram in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Jiachen Yu, Benjamin A. Foutty, Zhaoyu Han, Mark E. Bar- ber, Yoni Schattner, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Philip Phillips, Zhi-Xun Shen, Steven A. Kivelson, and Benjamin E. Feldman, “Correlated hofstadter spectrum and flavour phase di- agram in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature Physics 18, 825–831 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene,

    Xiaobo Lu, Petr Stepanov, Wei Yang, Ming Xie, Mo- hammed Ali Aamir, Ipsita Das, Carles Urgell, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Guangyu Zhang, Adrian Bachtold, Allan H. MacDonald, and Dmitri K. Efetov, “Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene,” Nature574, 653–657 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Matthew Yankowitz, Shaowen Chen, Hryhoriy Polshyn, Yux- uan Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, David Graf, Andrea F. Young, and Cory R. Dean, “Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene,” Science363, 1059–1064 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Un- conventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene super- lattices,

    Yuan Cao, Valla Fatemi, Shiang Fang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Efthimios Kaxiras, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Un- conventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene super- lattices,” Nature556, 43–50 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Correlated insulating and superconducting states in twisted bi- layer graphene below the magic angle,

    Emilio Codecido, Qiyue Wang, Ryan Koester, Shi Che, Haidong Tian, Rui Lv, Son Tran, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Fan Zhang, Marc Bockrath, and Chun Ning Lau, “Correlated insulating and superconducting states in twisted bi- layer graphene below the magic angle,” Science Advances5, eaaw9770 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Moir ´e bands in twisted double-layer graphene,

    Rafi Bistritzer and Allan H. MacDonald, “Moir ´e bands in twisted double-layer graphene,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108, 12233–12237 (2011)

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    Origin of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Grigory Tarnopolsky, Alex Jura Kruchkov, and Ashvin Vish- wanath, “Origin of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 106405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Pseudo landau level representation of twisted bilayer graphene: Band topology and implications on the correlated insulating phase,

    Jianpeng Liu, Junwei Liu, and Xi Dai, “Pseudo landau level representation of twisted bilayer graphene: Band topology and implications on the correlated insulating phase,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 155415 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    All magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene are topological,

    Zhida Song, Zhijun Wang, Wujun Shi, Gang Li, Chen Fang, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “All magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene are topological,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 036401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Twisted bilayer graphene. ii. stable symmetry anomaly,

    Zhi-Da Song, Biao Lian, Nicolas Regnault, and B. An- drei Bernevig, “Twisted bilayer graphene. ii. stable symmetry anomaly,” Phys. Rev. B103, 205412 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Fail- ure of nielsen-ninomiya theorem and fragile topology in two- dimensional systems with space-time inversion symmetry: Ap- plication to twisted bilayer graphene at magic angle,

    Junyeong Ahn, Sungjoon Park, and Bohm-Jung Yang, “Fail- ure of nielsen-ninomiya theorem and fragile topology in two- dimensional systems with space-time inversion symmetry: Ap- plication to twisted bilayer graphene at magic angle,” Phys. Rev. X9, 021013 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Faithful tight-binding models and fragile topology of magic- angle bilayer graphene,

    Hoi Chun Po, Liujun Zou, T. Senthil, and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Faithful tight-binding models and fragile topology of magic- angle bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B99, 195455 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Origin of mott insulating behavior and superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Hoi Chun Po, Liujun Zou, Ashvin Vishwanath, and T. Senthil, “Origin of mott insulating behavior and superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. X8, 031089 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Fragile topology and wannier obstructions,

    Hoi Chun Po, Haruki Watanabe, and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Fragile topology and wannier obstructions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 126402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Strong coupling phases of par- tially filled twisted bilayer graphene narrow bands,

    Jian Kang and Oskar Vafek, “Strong coupling phases of par- tially filled twisted bilayer graphene narrow bands,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 246401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Non-abelian dirac node braid- ing and near-degeneracy of correlated phases at odd integer fill- ing in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Jian Kang and Oskar Vafek, “Non-abelian dirac node braid- ing and near-degeneracy of correlated phases at odd integer fill- ing in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B102, 035161 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Twisted bilayer graphene aligned with hexagonal boron nitride: Anomalous hall effect and a lattice model,

    Ya-Hui Zhang, Dan Mao, and T. Senthil, “Twisted bilayer graphene aligned with hexagonal boron nitride: Anomalous hall effect and a lattice model,” Phys. Rev. Res.1, 033126 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Kekul ´e valence bond order in an extended hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice with possible applications to twisted bilayer graphene,

    Xiao Yan Xu, K. T. Law, and Patrick A. Lee, “Kekul ´e valence bond order in an extended hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice with possible applications to twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B98, 121406 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Nature of the correlated in- sulator states in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Ming Xie and A. H. MacDonald, “Nature of the correlated in- sulator states in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 097601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Chiral spin density wave andd+idsuperconductivity in the magic-angle-twisted bilayer graphene,

    Cheng-Cheng Liu, Li-Da Zhang, Wei-Qiang Chen, and Fan Yang, “Chiral spin density wave andd+idsuperconductivity in the magic-angle-twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 217001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Antiferro- magnetically ordered mott insulator and d+id superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene: a quantum monte carlo study,

    Tongyun Huang, Lufeng Zhang, and Tianxing Ma, “Antiferro- magnetically ordered mott insulator and d+id superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene: a quantum monte carlo study,” Sci- ence Bulletin64, 310–314 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Theories for the correlated insulating states and quantum anomalous hall effect phenomena in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Jianpeng Liu and Xi Dai, “Theories for the correlated insulating states and quantum anomalous hall effect phenomena in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B103, 035427 (2021). 8

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Nematic topological semimetal and insulator in magic- angle bilayer graphene at charge neutrality,

    Shang Liu, Eslam Khalaf, Jong Yeon Lee, and Ashvin Vish- wanath, “Nematic topological semimetal and insulator in magic- angle bilayer graphene at charge neutrality,” Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013033 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Mechanism for anomalous hall ferromagnetism in twisted bi- layer graphene,

    Nick Bultinck, Shubhayu Chatterjee, and Michael P. Zaletel, “Mechanism for anomalous hall ferromagnetism in twisted bi- layer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 166601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Ground state and hidden symmetry of magic-angle graphene at even integer filling,

    Nick Bultinck, Eslam Khalaf, Shang Liu, Shubhayu Chatter- jee, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Michael P. Zaletel, “Ground state and hidden symmetry of magic-angle graphene at even integer filling,” Phys. Rev. X10, 031034 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Collective excita- tions of quantum anomalous hall ferromagnets in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Fengcheng Wu and Sankar Das Sarma, “Collective excita- tions of quantum anomalous hall ferromagnets in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 046403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Realization of topological mott insulator in a twisted bilayer graphene lattice model,

    Bin-Bin Chen, Yuan Da Liao, Ziyu Chen, Oskar Vafek, Jian Kang, Wei Li, and Zi Yang Meng, “Realization of topological mott insulator in a twisted bilayer graphene lattice model,” Na- ture Communications12, 5480 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Chiral so(4) spin-valley density wave and degener- ate topological superconductivity in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Chen Lu, Yongyou Zhang, Yu Zhang, Ming Zhang, Cheng- Cheng Liu, Yu Wang, Zheng-Cheng Gu, Wei-Qiang Chen, and Fan Yang, “Chiral so(4) spin-valley density wave and degener- ate topological superconductivity in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B106, 024518 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Correlation-induced insulating topological phases at charge neutrality in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Yuan Da Liao, Jian Kang, Clara N. Breiø, Xiao Yan Xu, Han- Qing Wu, Brian M. Andersen, Rafael M. Fernandes, and Zi Yang Meng, “Correlation-induced insulating topological phases at charge neutrality in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. X11, 011014 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Twisted bilayer graphene. iv. exact insulator ground states and phase diagram,

    Biao Lian, Zhi-Da Song, Nicolas Regnault, Dmitri K. Efe- tov, Ali Yazdani, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Twisted bilayer graphene. iv. exact insulator ground states and phase diagram,” Phys. Rev. B103, 205414 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Twisted bilayer graphene. vi. an exact diagonalization study at nonzero integer filling,

    Fang Xie, Aditya Cowsik, Zhi-Da Song, Biao Lian, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Nicolas Regnault, “Twisted bilayer graphene. vi. an exact diagonalization study at nonzero integer filling,” Phys. Rev. B103, 205416 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Hybrid wan- nier chern bands in magic angle twisted bilayer graphene and the quantized anomalous hall effect,

    Kasra Hejazi, Xiao Chen, and Leon Balents, “Hybrid wan- nier chern bands in magic angle twisted bilayer graphene and the quantized anomalous hall effect,” Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013242 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Many-body effects in twisted bilayer graphene at low twist angles,

    A. O. Sboychakov, A. V . Rozhkov, A. L. Rakhmanov, and Franco Nori, “Many-body effects in twisted bilayer graphene at low twist angles,” Phys. Rev. B100, 045111 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Charge smoothening and band flattening due to hartree correc- tions in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Louk Rademaker, Dmitry A. Abanin, and Paula Mellado, “Charge smoothening and band flattening due to hartree correc- tions in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B100, 205114 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Electrostatic effects, band distortions, and superconductivity in twisted graphene bi- layers,

    Francisco Guinea and Niels R. Walet, “Electrostatic effects, band distortions, and superconductivity in twisted graphene bi- layers,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 13174–13179 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    Ferromag- netic mott state in twisted graphene bilayers at the magic angle,

    Kangjun Seo, Valeri N. Kotov, and Bruno Uchoa, “Ferromag- netic mott state in twisted graphene bilayers at the magic angle,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 246402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Twisted bilayer graphene. iii. interacting hamiltonian and exact symmetries,

    B. Andrei Bernevig, Zhi-Da Song, Nicolas Regnault, and Biao Lian, “Twisted bilayer graphene. iii. interacting hamiltonian and exact symmetries,” Phys. Rev. B103, 205413 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Cascades between light and heavy fermions in the normal state of magic- angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Jian Kang, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Oskar Vafek, “Cascades between light and heavy fermions in the normal state of magic- angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 266402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Cor- related insulating phases of twisted bilayer graphene at commen- surate filling fractions: A hartree-fock study,

    Yi Zhang, Kun Jiang, Ziqiang Wang, and Fuchun Zhang, “Cor- related insulating phases of twisted bilayer graphene at commen- surate filling fractions: A hartree-fock study,” Phys. Rev. B102, 035136 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    Theory of correlated chern insulators in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Xiaoyu Wang and Oskar Vafek, “Theory of correlated chern insulators in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. X14, 021042 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Narrow bands in magnetic field and strong-coupling hofstadter spectra,

    Xiaoyu Wang and Oskar Vafek, “Narrow bands in magnetic field and strong-coupling hofstadter spectra,” Phys. Rev. B106, L121111 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Tun- able correlated chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moir´esuperlattice,

    Guorui Chen, Aaron L. Sharpe, Eli J. Fox, Ya-Hui Zhang, Shaoxin Wang, Lili Jiang, Bosai Lyu, Hongyuan Li, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Zhiwen Shi, T. Senthil, David Goldhaber-Gordon, Yuanbo Zhang, and Feng Wang, “Tun- able correlated chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moir´esuperlattice,” Nature579, 56–61 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Quantum anomalous hall effect from intertwined moir´ebands,

    Tingxin Li, Shengwei Jiang, Bowen Shen, Yang Zhang, Lizhong Li, Zui Tao, Trithep Devakul, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Liang Fu, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak, “Quantum anomalous hall effect from intertwined moir´ebands,” Nature600, 641–646 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous hall effects in twisted bilayer mote2,

    Fan Xu, Zheng Sun, Tongtong Jia, Chang Liu, Cheng Xu, Chushan Li, Yu Gu, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Bing- bing Tong, Jinfeng Jia, Zhiwen Shi, Shengwei Jiang, Yang Zhang, Xiaoxue Liu, and Tingxin Li, “Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous hall effects in twisted bilayer mote2,” Phys. Rev. X13, 031037 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect,

    Heonjoon Park, Jiaqi Cai, Eric Anderson, Yinong Zhang, Jiayi Zhu, Xiaoyu Liu, Chong Wang, William Holtzmann, Chaowei Hu, Zhaoyu Liu, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Jiun-Haw Chu, Ting Cao, Liang Fu, Wang Yao, Cui-Zu Chang, David Cob- den, Di Xiao, and Xiaodong Xu, “Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect,” Nature622, 74–79 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene,

    Zhengguang Lu, Tonghang Han, Yuxuan Yao, Aidan P. Reddy, Jixiang Yang, Junseok Seo, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Liang Fu, and Long Ju, “Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene,” Nature626, 759–764 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Giant orbital magnetoelectric effect and current-induced magnetization switching in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Wen-Yu He, David Goldhaber-Gordon, and K. T. Law, “Giant orbital magnetoelectric effect and current-induced magnetization switching in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature Communications 11, 1650 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    Current-induced reversal of anomalous hall conductance in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Ying Su and Shi-Zeng Lin, “Current-induced reversal of anomalous hall conductance in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 226401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    Current-driven magnetization reversal in orbital chern insula- tors,

    Chunli Huang, Nemin Wei, and Allan H. MacDonald, “Current-driven magnetization reversal in orbital chern insula- tors,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 056801 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Theory of corre- lated insulating behaviour and spin-triplet superconductivity in twisted double bilayer graphene,

    Jong Yeon Lee, Eslam Khalaf, Shang Liu, Xiaomeng Liu, Zeyu Hao, Philip Kim, and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Theory of corre- lated insulating behaviour and spin-triplet superconductivity in twisted double bilayer graphene,” Nature Communications10, 5333 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    Spin-polarized ne- matic order, quantum valley hall states, and field-tunable topo- logical transitions in twisted multilayer graphene systems,

    Shihao Zhang, Xi Dai, and Jianpeng Liu, “Spin-polarized ne- matic order, quantum valley hall states, and field-tunable topo- logical transitions in twisted multilayer graphene systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 026403 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    Imaging orbital ferromagnetism in a moir ´e chern insulator,

    C. L. Tschirhart, M. Serlin, H. Polshyn, A. Shragai, Z. Xia, J. Zhu, Y . Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. E. Huber, and A. F. Young, “Imaging orbital ferromagnetism in a moir ´e chern insulator,” Science372, 1323–1327 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    Chern mosaic and berry- curvature magnetism in magic-angle graphene,

    Sameer Grover, Matan Bocarsly, Aviram Uri, Petr Stepanov, Giorgio Di Battista, Indranil Roy, Jiewen Xiao, Alexan- der Y . Meltzer, Yuri Myasoedov, Keshav Pareek, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Binghai Yan, Ady Stern, Erez Berg, Dmitri K. Efetov, and Eli Zeldov, “Chern mosaic and berry- curvature magnetism in magic-angle graphene,” Nature Physics 18,...

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Quantum valley hall effect, orbital magnetism, and anomalous hall effect in twisted multilayer graphene systems,

    Jianpeng Liu, Zhen Ma, Jinhua Gao, and Xi Dai, “Quantum valley hall effect, orbital magnetism, and anomalous hall effect in twisted multilayer graphene systems,” Phys. Rev. X9, 031021 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Orbital magnetic states in moir´egraphene systems,

    Jianpeng Liu and Xi Dai, “Orbital magnetic states in moir´egraphene systems,” Nature Reviews Physics3, 367–382 (2021)

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    V oltage- controlled magnetic reversal in orbital chern insulators,

    Jihang Zhu, Jung-Jung Su, and A. H. MacDonald, “V oltage- controlled magnetic reversal in orbital chern insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 227702 (2020)

    work page 2020

  70. [70]

    Orbital mag- netization and magnetic susceptibility of interacting electrons,

    Jian Kang, Minxuan Wang, and Oskar Vafek, “Orbital mag- netization and magnetic susceptibility of interacting electrons,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.20626 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Magnetic-Field-Induced Ge- ometric Response of Mean-Field Projectors: Streda Formula and Orbital Magnetization,

    Jihang Zhu and Chunli Huang, “Magnetic-Field-Induced Ge- ometric Response of Mean-Field Projectors: Streda Formula and Orbital Magnetization,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.07001 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Orbital Magnetization of Correlated States in Twisted Bilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

    Xiaoyu Liu, Chong Wang, Xiao-Wei Zhang, Ting Cao, and Di Xiao, “Orbital Magnetization in Correlated States of Twisted Bilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.01727 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    A Quantum Many-Body Approach for Orbital Magnetism in Correlated Multiband Electron Systems,

    Mengxing Ye, “A Quantum Many-Body Approach for Orbital Magnetism in Correlated Multiband Electron Systems,” arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2601.14372 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    Orbital Magnetization of Interact- ing Electrons,

    Xi Chen and Zhi-Da Song, “Orbital Magnetization of Interact- ing Electrons,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2602.02478 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  75. [75]

    Orbital magnetization in crystalline solids: Multi- band insulators, chern insulators, and metals,

    Davide Ceresoli, T. Thonhauser, David Vanderbilt, and R. Resta, “Orbital magnetization in crystalline solids: Multi- band insulators, chern insulators, and metals,” Phys. Rev. B74, 024408 (2006)

    work page 2006

  76. [76]

    Bandwidth-tuned mott transition and superconductiv- ity in moir´ewse2,

    Yiyu Xia, Zhongdong Han, Jiacheng Zhu, Yichi Zhang, Patrick Kn¨uppel, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Kin Fai Mak, and Jie Shan, “Bandwidth-tuned mott transition and superconductiv- ity in moir´ewse2,” Nature650, 585–591 (2026)

    work page 2026

  77. [77]

    Continuum model of the twisted graphene bilayer,

    J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres, and A. H. Cas- tro Neto, “Continuum model of the twisted graphene bilayer,” Phys. Rev. B86, 155449 (2012)

    work page 2012

  78. [78]

    See Supplemental Material for more detailed discussions

    work page

  79. [79]

    Dichroicf-sum rule and the orbital magnetization of crystals,

    Ivo Souza and David Vanderbilt, “Dichroicf-sum rule and the orbital magnetization of crystals,” Phys. Rev. B77, 054438 (2008)

    work page 2008

  80. [80]

    Magnetic circular dichroism versus orbital magnetization,

    Raffaele Resta, “Magnetic circular dichroism versus orbital magnetization,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023139 (2020)

    work page 2020

Showing first 80 references.