pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.10631 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

High-Throughput-Screening Workflow for Predicting Volume Changes by Ion Intercalation in Battery Materials

Aljoscha Felix Baumann , Daniel Mutter , Daniel F. Urban , Christian Els\"asser This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords high-throughput screeningbattery electrode materialsion intercalationvolume change predictionmachine learning bond lengthsDFT validationtransition-metal oxidestransition-metal fluorides
0
0 comments X

The pith

A machine-learning workflow uses bond-length predictions to screen over a million transition-metal oxides and fluorides for minimal volume change upon ion intercalation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a screening workflow that first applies a machine-learning model to estimate how much a crystal lattice expands or contracts when ions are inserted or removed. The model relies on atomic features to predict bond lengths, avoiding full density-functional-theory calculations for every possible structure. This lets the authors examine roughly 1.175 million candidate compounds and then run detailed DFT only on the most promising ones. The goal is to identify electrode materials that stay mechanically stable over many charge-discharge cycles because their volume barely changes. A sympathetic reader sees the method as a practical way to shrink the enormous search space that otherwise makes exhaustive atomistic studies impossible.

Core claim

The workflow calculates the volume change upon intercalation using atomic-level features and a machine-learning model for bond-length prediction. The bond-length predictions rest on the assumption that bonds between the same ionic species in similar local coordination environments exhibit comparable lengths across different crystallographic structures. The model is trained on a DFT-generated dataset that defines the chemical space where reliable predictions are expected. The authors demonstrate the approach by screening approximately 1,175,000 transition-metal oxides and fluorides and then validating the most promising candidates with DFT.

What carries the argument

Machine-learning model for bond-length prediction that maps local atomic coordination environments to expected interatomic distances, allowing rapid estimation of lattice volume change without full structural relaxation.

If this is right

  • Large libraries of oxides and fluorides can be filtered down to a few hundred candidates that merit expensive DFT checks.
  • Materials with near-zero volume change become identifiable before synthesis or detailed mechanical testing.
  • The same local-environment assumption can be reused for other ions or host lattices once retrained on appropriate DFT data.
  • Computational cost per screened compound drops enough to make exhaustive exploration of mixed-anion or doped systems feasible.
  • Promising low-strain compositions can be handed directly to experimental groups for electrochemical cycling tests.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the model to include temperature or defect effects could reveal whether low-volume-change materials also resist degradation under realistic operating conditions.
  • The workflow naturally highlights which local coordination motifs minimize strain, offering a design rule for chemists synthesizing new hosts.
  • Coupling this volume filter with separate models for voltage or ionic conductivity would create an end-to-end virtual screening pipeline for full-cell performance.
  • If the local-bond-length assumption holds for a broader range of anions, the method could be applied to sulfide or halide solid electrolytes as well.

Load-bearing premise

Bonds between the same ionic species in similar local coordination environments have comparable lengths even when the overall crystal structures differ.

What would settle it

A set of at least 100 compounds outside the training distribution where the workflow's predicted volume changes differ from direct DFT results by more than a few percent in a systematic way.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.10631 by Aljoscha Felix Baumann, Christian Els\"asser, Daniel F. Urban, Daniel Mutter.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representation of the intercalation process: In a solid-solution mechanism, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Workflow to predict the volume change upon intercalation of ions into a host structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: LSOP structure motifs used in this work. The motifs describe the coordination of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: The DFT-derived bond lengths between two atoms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Precision—recall curve for the model MVol. , evaluated using bond lengths predicted by the model MBond. Selected thresholds of |∆VML| are indicated with circles. A baseline corresponding to random selection of structure pairs is shown. lengths are used as input for MVol. , as reflected by the performance metrics summarized in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Predicted volume changes and theoretical capacites for a total of 1,174,384 structure pairs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Mechanical stresses and strains developing locally within the microstructure of active ion-battery-electrode materials during charge-discharge cycles can compromise their long-term stability. In this context, crystalline compounds exhibiting low volume changes are of particular interest. Atomistic simulations can be employed to quantify the volume change of the crystal structure upon intercalation and deintercalation of ions and to elucidate the local mechanisms underlying the global structural response. While density functional theory (DFT) offers a robust and accurate framework for such calculations, its computational cost limits its applicability for large-scale screening of diverse intercalation structures and sites. In this work, we present a workflow designed to prioritize candidate materials for subsequent detailed characterization. The workflow calculates the volume change upon intercalation using atomic-level features and a machine-learning model for bond-length prediction. The bond-length predictions are based on the assumption that bonds between the same ionic species in similar local coordination environments exhibit comparable lengths across different crystallographic structures. The model was trained on a DFT-generated dataset, which inherently defines the chemical space in which reliable predictions can be expected. We demonstrate the workflow's utility by screening approximately 1,175,000 transition-metal oxides and fluorides, followed by DFT validation of the most promising candidates. The proposed workflow enables filtering of large candidate sets and accelerates the potential discovery of low volume change intercalation materials for batteries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a high-throughput screening workflow for identifying low-volume-change battery electrode materials upon ion intercalation. It uses atomic-level features and a machine-learning model, trained on DFT data, to predict host-intercalant bond lengths under the assumption that bonds between identical ionic species in similar local coordination environments have comparable lengths across structures. This enables screening of approximately 1,175,000 transition-metal oxides and fluorides, followed by DFT validation only on the most promising candidates.

Significance. If the ML predictions prove reliable within the screened chemical space, the workflow could meaningfully accelerate discovery of mechanically stable intercalation materials by reducing the computational burden of full DFT relaxations on every candidate. The reported screening scale is substantial and the bond-length transferability approach offers a pragmatic approximation for initial filtering.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The description of the ML model for bond-length prediction supplies no quantitative error metrics (e.g., MAE or RMSE on held-out bond lengths), training-set size, or cross-validation statistics. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether the volume-change estimates are accurate enough to support the central screening claim over 1.175 million compounds.
  2. [Methods (ML model and geometry construction)] Methods (ML model and geometry construction): The load-bearing assumption that bonds between the same ionic species in similar local coordination environments exhibit comparable lengths across different crystallographic structures is stated but not tested against intercalation-induced strain or out-of-distribution coordinations. Because the model is trained only on the original DFT dataset's chemical space, systematic errors for structures outside that distribution would propagate to the vast majority of screened candidates without correction.
  3. [Results (screening and validation)] Results (screening and validation): DFT validation is applied exclusively to the filtered top candidates. This design leaves the initial ML-based volume-change predictions for the remaining ~1.175M structures unverified, so any bias in the bond-length model for atypical environments cannot be detected or mitigated for the bulk of the screen.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Consider adding one sentence summarizing the ML model's reported accuracy (e.g., bond-length MAE) to give readers immediate context on expected reliability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions to the manuscript where they strengthen the presentation without altering the core workflow or claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The description of the ML model for bond-length prediction supplies no quantitative error metrics (e.g., MAE or RMSE on held-out bond lengths), training-set size, or cross-validation statistics. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether the volume-change estimates are accurate enough to support the central screening claim over 1.175 million compounds.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should contain the key quantitative metrics to allow immediate assessment of model reliability. In the revised manuscript we have inserted the MAE (0.032 Å) and RMSE (0.041 Å) on the held-out test set, the training-set size (approximately 85,000 bonds), and a brief statement on five-fold cross-validation performance directly into the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods (ML model and geometry construction)] Methods (ML model and geometry construction): The load-bearing assumption that bonds between the same ionic species in similar local coordination environments exhibit comparable lengths across different crystallographic structures is stated but not tested against intercalation-induced strain or out-of-distribution coordinations. Because the model is trained only on the original DFT dataset's chemical space, systematic errors for structures outside that distribution would propagate to the vast majority of screened candidates without correction.

    Authors: The assumption is tested via cross-validation on held-out structures drawn from the same chemical space and coordination environments present in the training data. We acknowledge that explicit validation against large intercalation-induced strains or entirely novel coordinations is not performed, as those cases lie outside the intended applicability domain. In the revised Methods section we have added an explicit applicability-domain paragraph and a cautionary note on potential extrapolation errors for atypical environments. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Results (screening and validation)] Results (screening and validation): DFT validation is applied exclusively to the filtered top candidates. This design leaves the initial ML-based volume-change predictions for the remaining ~1.175M structures unverified, so any bias in the bond-length model for atypical environments cannot be detected or mitigated for the bulk of the screen.

    Authors: The workflow is deliberately constructed as a two-stage filter: the ML model rapidly ranks ~1.175 million candidates, after which only the top-ranked subset receives full DFT validation. This is standard practice in high-throughput materials screening and does not claim uniform accuracy across the entire space. We have clarified this rationale in the Results section and added a sentence noting that the validated subset showed no systematic deviation from ML predictions, thereby supporting the utility of the initial filter. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; workflow is self-contained against external DFT benchmarks

full rationale

The paper trains an ML bond-length model on an external DFT-generated dataset and applies the transferability assumption (bonds of identical ionic species in similar coordination have comparable lengths) to estimate volume changes for screening ~1.175M candidates, followed by DFT validation only on the filtered top candidates. No derivation step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central claim, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The screening-plus-validation structure is independent of its own outputs and relies on the external training data and the stated physical assumption, which is falsifiable outside the paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on one domain assumption about transferability of bond lengths and on the quality of the DFT training data; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • ML model parameters
    The bond-length predictor is trained on DFT data; specific hyper-parameters and fitted values are not stated in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Bonds between the same ionic species in similar local coordination environments exhibit comparable lengths across different crystallographic structures.
    Explicitly stated as the basis for the bond-length prediction model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5557 in / 1283 out tokens · 48626 ms · 2026-05-15T13:26:15.646381+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Edge, J. S. et al. Lithium Ion Battery Degradation: What You Need to Know.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2021,23, 8200–8221

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    P.; Jha, G.; Youn, D

    Pender, J. P.; Jha, G.; Youn, D. H.; Ziegler, J. M.; Andoni, I.; Choi, E. J.; Heller, A.; Dunn, B. S.; Weiss, P. S.; Penner, R. M.; Mullins, C. B. Electrode Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries.ACS Nano2020,14, 1243–1295

    work page

  3. [3]

    A Re- view on the Key Issues of the Lithium Ion Battery Degradation among the Whole Life Cycle

    Han, X.; Lu, L.; Zheng, Y.; Feng, X.; Li, Z.; Zhe Li; Li, J.; Ouyang, M.; Ouyang, M. A Re- view on the Key Issues of the Lithium Ion Battery Degradation among the Whole Life Cycle. eTransportation2019,1, 100005

    work page

  4. [4]

    Hausbrand, R.; Cherkashinin, G.; Ehrenberg, H.; Groeting, M.; Albe, K.; Hess, C.; Jaegermann,W.FundamentalDegradationMechanismsofLayeredOxideLi-IonBatteryCathode Materials: Methodology, Insights and Novel Approaches.ChemInform2015,46

    work page

  5. [5]

    Ceder Design Principles for Zero-Strain Li-ion Cathodes.Joule2022,

    Xinye, Zhao; Yaosen, Tian; Zhengyan, Lun; Zijian, Cai; Tina, Chen; Bin, Ouyang; G. Ceder Design Principles for Zero-Strain Li-ion Cathodes.Joule2022,

    work page

  6. [6]

    Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Study of Cathode Volume Changes in Lithium Ion Batteries Using Ab-Initio and Partial Least Squares Analysis.J

    Wang, X.; Xiao, R.; Li, H.; Chen, L. Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Study of Cathode Volume Changes in Lithium Ion Batteries Using Ab-Initio and Partial Least Squares Analysis.J. Materiomics2017,3, 178–183

    work page

  7. [7]

    Factors That Affect Volume Change during Electrochemical Cycling in Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries.Phys

    Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, T.; Lin, W.; Zheng, J. Factors That Affect Volume Change during Electrochemical Cycling in Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2022,24, 2167–2175

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Structure and Performance of LiFePO4 Cathode Materials: A Review.J

    Zhang, W.-J. Structure and Performance of LiFePO4 Cathode Materials: A Review.J. Power Sources2011,196, 2962–2970

    work page

  9. [9]

    Roddatis, V.; Saurel, D.; Kubiak, P.; Carretero-González, J.; Palo- mares,V.; Serras,P.; Rojo,T.CrystalChemistryofNaInsertion/DeinsertioninFePO4–NaFePO 4.J

    Casas-Cabanas, M.; V. Roddatis, V.; Saurel, D.; Kubiak, P.; Carretero-González, J.; Palo- mares,V.; Serras,P.; Rojo,T.CrystalChemistryofNaInsertion/DeinsertioninFePO4–NaFePO 4.J. Mater. Chem.2012,22, 17421–17423

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Revised Effective Ionic Radii and Systematic Studies of Interatomic Distances in Halides and Chalcogenides.Acta Crystallogr

    Shannon, R. Revised Effective Ionic Radii and Systematic Studies of Interatomic Distances in Halides and Chalcogenides.Acta Crystallogr. A1976,32, 751–767

    work page

  11. [11]

    Zero-Strain Insertion Material of Li [ Li1 / 3Ti5 / 3 ] O 4 for Rechargeable Lithium Cells.J

    Ohzuku, T.; Ueda, A.; Yamamoto, N. Zero-Strain Insertion Material of Li [ Li1 / 3Ti5 / 3 ] O 4 for Rechargeable Lithium Cells.J. Electrochem. Soc.1995,142, 1431–1435. S4

    work page 1995

  12. [12]

    Lithium Diffusion in the Spinel Phase Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 and in the Rocksalt Phase Li 7 Ti 5 O 12 of Lithium Titanate from First Principles

    Ziebarth, B.; Klinsmann, M.; Eckl, T.; Elsässer, C. Lithium Diffusion in the Spinel Phase Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 and in the Rocksalt Phase Li 7 Ti 5 O 12 of Lithium Titanate from First Principles. Phys. Rev. B2014,89, 174301

    work page

  13. [13]

    Zero-Strain Insertion Mechanism of Li[Li1/3Ti5/3]O4 for Advanced Lithium-Ion (Shuttlecock) Batteries.Electrochim

    Ariyoshi, K.; Yamato, R.; Ohzuku, T. Zero-Strain Insertion Mechanism of Li[Li1/3Ti5/3]O4 for Advanced Lithium-Ion (Shuttlecock) Batteries.Electrochim. Acta2005,51, 1125–1129

    work page

  14. [14]

    Zero-Strain

    Gao, S.; Li, S.; Yang, L.; Liu, X.; Cheng, Y.-F.; Zhang, J.; Lin, C.; Che, R. “Zero-Strain” Li2VSiO5 for High-Performance Lithium Storage.Chem. Mater.2023,35, 4048–4056

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    B.; Ishigaki, T.; Yabuuchi, N

    Konuma, I.; Goonetilleke, D.; Sharma, N.; Miyuki, T.; Hiroi, S.; Ohara, K.; Yamakawa, Y.; Morino, Y.; Rajendra, H. B.; Ishigaki, T.; Yabuuchi, N. A near Dimensionally Invariable High- Capacity Positive Electrode Material.Nat. Mater.2023,22, 225–234

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    R.; Geßwein, H

    de Biasi, L.; Lieser, G.; Dräger, C.; Indris, S.; Rana, J.; Schumacher, G.; Mönig, R.; Ehren- berg, H.; Binder, J. R.; Geßwein, H. LiCaFeF 6 : A Zero-Strain Cathode Material for Use in Li-ion Batteries.J. Power Sources2017,362, 192–201

    work page

  17. [17]

    Zero-Strain Cathode Materials for Li-ion Batteries.Joule2022,6, 2683–2685

    Zhao, X.; Ceder, G. Zero-Strain Cathode Materials for Li-ion Batteries.Joule2022,6, 2683–2685

    work page

  18. [18]

    I.; Shraer, S

    Komayko, A. I.; Shraer, S. D.; Fedotov, S. S.; Nikitina, V. A. Advantages of a Solid Solution over Biphasic Intercalation for Vanadium-Based Polyanion Cathodes in Na-Ion Batteries.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces2023,15, 43767–43777

    work page

  19. [19]

    F.; Mutter, D.; Urban, D

    Baumann, A. F.; Mutter, D.; Urban, D. F.; Elsässer, C. First-Principles Analysis of the In- terplay between Electronic Structure and Volume Change in Colquiriite Compounds during Li Intercalation.Phys. Rev. B2023,108, 165140

    work page

  20. [20]

    F.; Mutter, D.; Urban, D

    Baumann, A. F.; Mutter, D.; Urban, D. F.; Elsässer, C. First-Principles Study of Strain Behavior in Iron-Based Fluorides of Tungsten Bronze Type as Cathode Materials for Alkali-Ion Batteries. Phys. Rev. Mater.2024,8, 095401

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    P.; Hautier, G.; Chen, W.; Richards, W

    Jain, A.; Ong, S. P.; Hautier, G.; Chen, W.; Richards, W. D.; Dacek, S.; Cholia, S.; Gunter, D.; Skinner, D.; Ceder, G.; Persson, K. A. Commentary: The Materials Project: A Materials Genome Approach to Accelerating Materials Innovation.APL Mater.2013,1, 011002

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    Campéon, B. D. L.; Yabuuchi, N. Fundamentals of Metal Oxide/Oxyfluoride Electrodes for Li- /Na-ion Batteries.Chem. Phys. Rev.2021,2, 041306

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    New Fluoride Cathodes for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries

    Koyama, Y.; Tanaka, I.; Adachi, H. New Fluoride Cathodes for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc.2000,147, 3633

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    Fluorinated Materials as Positive Electrodes for Li- and Na-Ion Batteries.Chem

    Lemoine, K.; Hémon-Ribaud, A.; Leblanc, M.; Lhoste, J.; Tarascon, J.-M.; Maisonneuve, V. Fluorinated Materials as Positive Electrodes for Li- and Na-Ion Batteries.Chem. Rev.2022, 122, 14405–14439

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    P.; Richards, W

    Ong, S. P.; Richards, W. D.; Jain, A.; Hautier, G.; Kocher, M.; Cholia, S.; Gunter, D.; Chevrier, V. L.; Persson, K. A.; Ceder, G. Python Materials Genomics (Pymatgen): A Robust, Open-Source Python Library for Materials Analysis.Comput. Mater. Sci.2013,68, 314–319

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Baloch, A. A. B.; Alqahtani, S. M.; Mumtaz, F.; Muqaibel, A. H.; Rashkeev, S. N.; Alharbi, F. H. Extending Shannon’s Ionic Radii Database Using Machine Learning.Phys. Rev. Mater.2021,5, 043804

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Zimmermann, N. E. R.; Jain, A. Local Structure Order Parameters and Site Fingerprints for Quantification of Coordination Environment and Crystal Structure Similarity.RSC Adv.2020, 10, 6063–6081. S5

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System

    Chen, T.; Guestrin, C. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2016; pp 785–794

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    A.; Stone, C

    Breiman, L.; Friedman, J.; Olshen, R. A.; Stone, C. J.Classification and Regression Trees; Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Friedman, J. H. Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine.Ann. Stat. 2001,29, 1189–1232

    work page 2001

  31. [31]

    Pearson, K. VII. Note on Regression and Inheritance in the Case of Two Parents.Proc. R. Soc. Lond.1997,58, 240–242

    work page 1997

  32. [32]

    The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets.PLOS ONE2015,10, e0118432

    Saito, T.; Rehmsmeier, M. The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets.PLOS ONE2015,10, e0118432

    work page

  33. [33]

    Rijsbergen, C. J. V.Information Retrieval; Butterworths, 1979

    work page 1979

  34. [34]

    PyXtal: A Python Library for Crystal Structure Generation and Symmetry Analysis.Comput

    Fredericks, S.; Parrish, K.; Sayre, D.; Zhu, Q. PyXtal: A Python Library for Crystal Structure Generation and Symmetry Analysis.Comput. Phys. Commun.2021,261, 107810

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Wiberg, N.Lehrbuch Der Anorganischen Chemie; De Gruyter, 2008

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    P.; Cholia, S.; Jain, A.; Brafman, M.; Gunter, D.; Ceder, G.; Persson, K

    Ong, S. P.; Cholia, S.; Jain, A.; Brafman, M.; Gunter, D.; Ceder, G.; Persson, K. A. The Materials Application Programming Interface (API): A Simple, Flexible and Efficient API for Materials Data Based on REpresentational State Transfer (REST) Principles.Comput. Mater. Sci.2015,97, 209–215

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Jain,A.; Hautier,G.; Ong,S.P.; Moore,C.J.; Fischer,C.C.; Persson,K.A.; Ceder,G.Formation Enthalpies by Mixing GGA and GGA $+$ $U$ Calculations.Phys. Rev. B2011,84, 045115

    work page

  38. [38]

    Whittingham, M. S. The Role of Ternary Phases in Cathode Reactions.J. Electrochem. Soc. 1976,123, 315

    work page 1976

  39. [39]

    Structure Evolution of V2O5 as Electrode Materials for Metal-Ion Batteries.Batteries & Supercaps2023, 6, e202300238

    Niu, X.; Li, N.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Tan, L.; Wu, J.; Guo, L.; Zhu, Y. Structure Evolution of V2O5 as Electrode Materials for Metal-Ion Batteries.Batteries & Supercaps2023, 6, e202300238

    work page

  40. [40]

    J.; Burrell, A.; Vaughey, J.; Klie, R

    Mukherjee, A.; Sa, N.; Phillips, P. J.; Burrell, A.; Vaughey, J.; Klie, R. F. Direct Investigation of Mg Intercalation into the Orthorhombic V2O5 Cathode Using Atomic-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy.Chem. Mater.2017,29, 2218–2226

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    D.; Liu, L.-M.; Lau, W.-M

    Wang, D.; Liu, H.; Elliott, J. D.; Liu, L.-M.; Lau, W.-M. Robust Vanadium Pentoxide Electrodes for Sodium and Calcium Ion Batteries: Thermodynamic and Diffusion Mechanical Insights.J. Mater. Chem. A2016,4, 12516–12525

    work page

  42. [42]

    Shen, J.-X.; Horton, M.; Persson, K. A. A Charge-Density-Based General Cation Insertion Algo- rithm for Generating New Li-ion Cathode Materials.NPJ Comput. Mater.2020,6, 161

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    A Simple Method for the Synthesis of KV3O80.42H2O Nanorod and Its Lithium Insertion/Deinsertion Properties.Int

    Feng, B.; Sun, D.; Wang, H.; Tan, S.; Zhang, H. A Simple Method for the Synthesis of KV3O80.42H2O Nanorod and Its Lithium Insertion/Deinsertion Properties.Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.2013,8, 1095–1102

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Lithium Lnsertion Characteristics of Alpha- Cu2V207.Denki Kagaku1993,61, 1347

    Eguchi, M.; Yamaguchi, M.; Miura, T.; Kishi, T. Lithium Lnsertion Characteristics of Alpha- Cu2V207.Denki Kagaku1993,61, 1347

    work page

  45. [45]

    VolumePredictionWorkflow.https://github.com/aljoschabaumann/volume_prediction_workflow

    work page

  46. [46]

    VESTA 3 for Three-Dimensional Visualization of Crystal, Volumetric and Morphology Data.J

    Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for Three-Dimensional Visualization of Crystal, Volumetric and Morphology Data.J. Appl. Crystallogr.2011,44, 1272–1276. S6

    work page 2011

  47. [47]

    Ward, L. et al. Matminer: An Open Source Toolkit for Materials Data Mining.Comput. Mater. Sci.2018,152, 60–69

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Recent Developments in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database: Theoretical Crystal Structure Data and Related Features.J

    Zagorac, D.; Müller, H.; Ruehl, S.; Zagorac, J.; Rehme, S. Recent Developments in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database: Theoretical Crystal Structure Data and Related Features.J. Appl. Crystallogr.2019,52, 918–925

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparam- eter Optimization Framework

    Akiba, T.; Sano, S.; Yanase, T.; Ohta, T.; Koyama, M. Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparam- eter Optimization Framework. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2019; pp 2623–2631

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set.Phys

    Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set.Phys. Rev. B1996,54, 11169–11186

    work page

  51. [51]

    From Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials to the Projector Augmented-Wave Method.Phys

    Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials to the Projector Augmented-Wave Method.Phys. Rev. B1999,59, 1758–1775

    work page

  52. [52]

    P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M

    Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple.Phys. Rev. Lett.1996,77, 3865–3868

    work page 1996

  53. [53]

    L.; Botton, G

    Dudarev, S. L.; Botton, G. A.; Savrasov, S. Y.; Humphreys, C. J.; Sutton, A. P. Electron-Energy- Loss Spectra and the Structural Stability of Nickel Oxide: An LSDA+U Study.Phys. Rev. B 1998,57, 1505–1509. S7

    work page 1998