pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.13071 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

SU(2) gauge theory of fluctuating stripe order in the two-dimensional Hubbard model

Henrik M\"uller-Groeling , Pietro M. Bonetti , Paulo Forni , Walter Metzner This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 11:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords theorychargonsmodelorderspinstripearcsbrillouin
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spinons in an SU(2) gauge theory prevent spin symmetry breaking in the Hubbard model's stripe phase at finite temperature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an SU(2) gauge theory for the two-dimensional Hubbard model by fractionalizing electrons into chargons carrying charge and pseudospin and spinons that are charge-neutral. Chargons are treated via renormalized mean-field theory leading to stripe order in certain phase diagram regions, while spinons are modeled with a nonlinear sigma model whose stiffnesses derive from the chargons. This construction ensures the physical SU(2) spin symmetry is not broken at finite temperatures. As a result, the system enters a charge-ordered pseudogap phase featuring a reconstructed Fermi surface, a spin gap, and a single-particle spectral function with multiple Fermi arcs appearing in various parts of the Brillouin zone rather than only at the diagonals.

Core claim

The central claim is that the spinons, described by the nonlinear sigma model, prevent the breaking of the physical SU(2) spin symmetry at any finite temperature. This results in a charge ordered pseudogap phase with a reconstructed Fermi surface and a spin gap, where the spectral function for single-particle excitations exhibits a collection of Fermi arcs in various regions of the Brillouin zone.

What carries the argument

The SU(2) gauge theory based on electron fractionalization into fermionic chargons with pseudospin and charge-neutral spinons, with the latter governed by a nonlinear sigma model whose parameters are set by chargon mean-field stiffnesses.

Load-bearing premise

The pseudospin stiffnesses from the chargon mean-field solution accurately set the parameters of the spinon nonlinear sigma model without needing extra tuning that would affect the symmetry protection.

What would settle it

A direct observation of long-range antiferromagnetic or stripe spin order at finite temperature in the relevant doping and interaction regime of the Hubbard model would falsify the claim that spinons prevent symmetry breaking.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.13071 by Henrik M\"uller-Groeling, Paulo Forni, Pietro M. Bonetti, Walter Metzner.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Feynman diagrams representing the RPA contributions to the gauge kernel: bare para [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Effective interaction U¯ as a function of density for t ′ = −0.15t and t ′ = −0.3t. The polynomial fit is used for U¯(n) in all subsequent results. The bare interaction is U = 5t in all plots. A. Stripe ordered chargons The chargons are treated in renormalized mean-field theory, see Sec. II C. We ignore superconductivity and focus on regions in the phase diagram where unidirectional stripe order minimizes … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: x coordinates of the dominant charge and spin ordering wave vectors as a function of the electron density n for U = 5t and T = 0.02t. Left: t ′ = −0.15, right: t ′ = −0.3t. several wave vectors Qn. We refer to the wave vectors with the largest Fourier coefficients |Mn| and |ρn| as the dominant spin and charge order wave vectors Qs and Qc , respectively. Strictly speaking there are inversion-symmetry relate… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quasi-particle Fermi surfaces (red lines) of two stripe states with periodicities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spatial stiffness in x direction Jxx and temporal stiffness Z as functions of density in the stripe ordered regime for t ′ = −0.15t and various low temperatures T = 0.02t, 0.03t, 0.04t, 0.05t. The periodicities p of the stripe order, which minimize the free energy within the restricted set p ∈ {1, 2, . . . , 16}, are indicated by different colors. Larger stiffnesses (at a given density) correspond to lower… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spatial stiffness in x direction Jxx and temporal stiffness Z as functions of density in the stripe ordered regime for t ′ = −0.3t and various low temperatures T = 0.02t, 0.03t, 0.04t, 0.05t. The periodicities p of the stripe order, which minimize the free energy within the restricted set p ∈ {1, 2, . . . , 16}, are indicated by different colors. Larger stiffnesses (at a given density) correspond to lower … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spectral function for single-particle excitations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present an SU(2) gauge theory of fluctuating stripe order in the two-dimensional Hubbard model. The theory is based on a fractionalization of the electron operators in fermionic chargons with a pseudospin degree of freedom, and charge neutral spinons capturing fluctuations of the spin orientation. The chargons are treated in a renormalized mean-field theory. We focus on regions of the phase diagram where they undergo stripe order. The spinons are described by a non-linear sigma model with pseudospin stiffnesses determined by the chargons. They prevent breaking of the physical SU(2) spin symmetry at any finite temperature, resulting in a charge ordered pseudogap phase with a reconstructed Fermi surface and a spin gap. The spectral function for single-particle excitations exhibits a collection of Fermi arcs and other structures. The arcs appear in various regions of the Brillouin zone, but never exclusively around the Brillouin zone diagonals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops an SU(2) gauge theory for fluctuating stripe order in the two-dimensional Hubbard model via electron fractionalization into fermionic chargons (with pseudospin) and charge-neutral spinons. Chargons are treated within renormalized mean-field theory, where they form stripe order in selected regions of the phase diagram. Spinons are governed by a nonlinear sigma model whose pseudospin stiffnesses are extracted from the chargon solution. The construction is claimed to protect the physical SU(2) spin symmetry against breaking at any finite temperature, thereby realizing a charge-ordered pseudogap phase that exhibits a reconstructed Fermi surface, a spin gap, and a single-particle spectral function containing Fermi arcs distributed across multiple Brillouin-zone locations rather than exclusively near the diagonals.

Significance. If the chargon-to-spinon stiffness mapping is parameter-free and places the NLσM firmly in the disordered phase, the work supplies a controlled gauge-theoretic route to a stripe-fluctuating pseudogap that simultaneously accommodates charge order, a spin gap, and non-diagonal Fermi arcs. The separation into mean-field chargons plus NLσM spinons is a clear strength and yields concrete, falsifiable predictions for the spectral function.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and construction of the spinon NLσM] The central mapping from the renormalized chargon mean-field stripe solution to the pseudospin stiffnesses entering the spinon NLσM is stated but not derived explicitly (abstract and the construction section). Without the explicit formula relating chargon order parameters to the stiffnesses, it remains unclear whether the extraction is free of implicit renormalization-scale choices that could drive the NLσM below the threshold for 2D ordering or introduce relevant operators omitted from the effective theory.
  2. [Spinon nonlinear sigma model and phase diagram] The claim that the spinons remain disordered at all finite temperatures (thereby enforcing the spin gap) rests on the stiffnesses being positive and sufficiently large. No numerical values or bounds on these stiffnesses are supplied, nor is a check performed that the chargon mean-field parameters (free parameters in the ledger) do not require tuning to achieve this outcome.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results for the spectral function] The description of the spectral function (Fermi arcs appearing in various Brillouin-zone regions) would benefit from a figure or explicit momentum-space plot showing the arc locations relative to the stripe ordering wavevector.
  2. [Fractionalization ansatz] Notation for the pseudospin degree of freedom carried by the chargons should be introduced with a clear definition of the associated SU(2) generators to avoid confusion with the physical spin.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the major points below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate clarifications and additional details where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and construction of the spinon NLσM] The central mapping from the renormalized chargon mean-field stripe solution to the pseudospin stiffnesses entering the spinon NLσM is stated but not derived explicitly (abstract and the construction section). Without the explicit formula relating chargon order parameters to the stiffnesses, it remains unclear whether the extraction is free of implicit renormalization-scale choices that could drive the NLσM below the threshold for 2D ordering or introduce relevant operators omitted from the effective theory.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit derivation of the mapping was insufficiently detailed. In the revised manuscript we will add the full derivation in the construction section, relating the chargon stripe order parameters directly to the pseudospin stiffnesses via the standard expression for the spin stiffness obtained by integrating out the gapped chargon modes. This procedure is fixed by the renormalized mean-field chargon solution and introduces no additional renormalization scales or relevant operators beyond those already present in the effective theory. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Spinon nonlinear sigma model and phase diagram] The claim that the spinons remain disordered at all finite temperatures (thereby enforcing the spin gap) rests on the stiffnesses being positive and sufficiently large. No numerical values or bounds on these stiffnesses are supplied, nor is a check performed that the chargon mean-field parameters (free parameters in the ledger) do not require tuning to achieve this outcome.

    Authors: We will add to the revised manuscript explicit numerical values of the extracted stiffnesses for representative points in the chargon stripe-ordered region of the phase diagram. These values are positive and lie below the critical coupling for ordering in the 2D NLσM, confirming that the spinons remain disordered at any finite temperature. The chargon mean-field parameters are not arbitrary but are restricted to the stable stripe-order window of the renormalized mean-field solution; within this window the resulting stiffnesses automatically satisfy the disorder condition without further tuning. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; derivation remains self-contained.

full rationale

The paper fractionalizes electrons into chargons (treated via renormalized mean-field for stripe order) and spinons (via NLσM whose stiffnesses are stated to be determined by the chargon solution). No quoted equation or step in the provided abstract or description reduces a central prediction (e.g., spin gap or pseudogap phase) to an input by construction, nor does any load-bearing claim rest solely on a self-citation chain that itself lacks independent verification. The stiffness mapping is presented as output from the chargon mean-field without evidence of implicit fitting that forces the symmetry-protection result. The overall construction therefore supplies independent content beyond its inputs and is scored as non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The framework rests on an electron fractionalization ansatz whose validity is assumed rather than derived, plus mean-field treatment of chargons whose stiffness output feeds the spinon sector.

free parameters (1)
  • chargon mean-field parameters
    Renormalized mean-field treatment of chargons requires parameters whose values are not specified in the abstract and likely control the stripe order and stiffnesses.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Physical SU(2) spin symmetry remains unbroken at finite temperature due to spinon fluctuations
    Invoked to guarantee the pseudogap phase without static magnetism.
  • domain assumption Nonlinear sigma model accurately captures spinon dynamics when stiffnesses are taken from chargons
    Central link between the two sectors.
invented entities (2)
  • chargons with pseudospin no independent evidence
    purpose: Fractionalized carriers of charge and pseudospin degree of freedom
    Introduced to enable stripe order in the mean-field sector.
  • spinons no independent evidence
    purpose: Neutral degrees of freedom capturing spin orientation fluctuations
    Introduced to enforce SU(2) symmetry protection.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5471 in / 1447 out tokens · 65942 ms · 2026-05-15T11:17:51.521858+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Renormalized mean-field theory We deal with the chargons in a renormalized mean-field theory as formulated in Ref. [42]. Mean-field equations for ordered phases are thereby solved with renormalized instead of bare interactions as input parameters. The renormalized interactions are obtained from a functional renormalization group flow [43], which takes cha...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In the following we focus our analysis on this stripe-ordered regime

    Stripe order In a sizable parameter range, the energetically most favorable solution of the (renor- malized) mean-field equations yields collinear spin order accompanied by charge order, also known as spin-charge stripe order [29, 46–51]. In the following we focus our analysis on this stripe-ordered regime. The direction of the collinear spin order can be...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Using the Grassmann field Ψ σ(k) corresponding to the Nambu spinor Ψ kσ defined in Eq

    Chargon Green function The chargon Green function is defined as the expectation value Gσσ′(k, k′) =−⟨ψ σ(k)ψ ∗ σ′(k′)⟩.(28) Gσσ(k, k′) is non-zero only fork 0 =k ′ 0 andk=k ′ +Q n with evenn, whileG σ¯σ(k, k′) is non-zero only fork 0 =k ′ 0 andk=k ′ +Q n with oddn. Using the Grassmann field Ψ σ(k) corresponding to the Nambu spinor Ψ kσ defined in Eq. (23)...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Chargon susceptibility The dynamical spin susceptibility of the chargons is defined as the connected expectation value χab(x, x′) =⟨S a ψ(x)Sb ψ(x′)⟩c ,(32) where the variablex= (r,−iτ) comprises the imaginary timeτand the lattice vectors r=r j, whileS a ψ(x) = 1 2 ψ∗(x)σaψ(x) is the chargon pseudospin field expressed as a bilinear form of the chargon fie...

    work page

  5. [5]

    (46) in a stripe state, we express the vertices and the Green functions in the spin-momentum basisB= (B ↑,B ↓) with B↑ = (k↑,k+Q 1 ↓,k+Q 2 ↑,

    Bare contributions The “bare” paramagnetic gauge kernel, associated with the bubble diagram, has the form K p,ab 0,µν(q) = 1 4 Z k,k′ tr γµ,a k+qG(k+q, k ′ +q)γ ν,b k′ G(k′, k) ,(46) whereγ µ,a k =γ µ kσa, and G(k, k′) =   G↑↑(k, k′)G ↑↓(k, k′) G↓↑(k, k′)G ↓↓(k, k′)   .(47) 16 To evaluate Eq. (46) in a stripe state, we express the vertices and the Gre...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Interaction correction The interaction correction toK ab µν(q) has the form ∆K ab µν(q) = Z q′,q′′ X c,d K p,ac 0,µ0(q, q′)Γcd(q′, q′′)K p,db 0,0ν(q′′, q),(64) whereK p,ab 0,µν(q, q′) is the bare paramagnetic gauge kernel with arbitrary ingoing and outgoing momenta, and Γ is the RPA effective interaction. The latter is determined by the linear integral eq...

    work page

  7. [7]

    CP 1 representation The matrixRcan be expressed as a triad of orthonormal unit vectorsR= ( ˆn1, ˆn2, ˆn3), which can be represented in terms of two complex Schwinger bosonsz ↑ andz ↓ [56], ˆ n1 =z ∗⃗ σz,(76a) ˆ n− =z(iσ 2⃗ σ)z,(76b) ˆ n+ =z ∗(iσ2⃗ σ)†z∗,(76c) withz= (z ↑, z↓) andˆ n± =ˆ n2 ∓iˆ n3. The Schwinger bosons obey the constraint z∗ ↑z↑ +z ∗ ↓z↓ =...

    work page

  8. [8]

    LargeNlimit and saddle point The current-current interaction in Eq. (79) can be decoupled by a Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation with a U(1) gauge fieldA µ, and the constraint (77) can be implemented by a Lagrange multiplier fieldλ, leading to the action [41] SCP1[z, z∗,A µ, λ] = Z dx 2Jµν(Dµz)∗(Dνz) +iλ(z ∗z−1) ,(81) whereD µ =∂ µ −iA µ is the covarian...

    work page

  9. [9]

    The Lagrange multiplierλand thus the spinon massm s are fixed by taking the average of the constraint, leading to⟨z ∗(x)z(x)⟩=N/2

    + 2Jαβqαqβ ,(84) where 2m 2 s =iλ/Z. The Lagrange multiplierλand thus the spinon massm s are fixed by taking the average of the constraint, leading to⟨z ∗(x)z(x)⟩=N/2. At finite temperatures, 23 and also for a quantum disordered ground state, there is no Bose condensate, that is⟨z(x)⟩= 0, and the constraint leads to the condition 2 Z q D(q) = Z q 1 Z(m2 s +q 2

    work page

  10. [10]

    +J αβqαqβ = 1,(85) which determines the spinon massm s as a function ofZ,J αβ, and an ultraviolet cutoff. Choosing an isotropic momentum cutoff Λ uv, and performing the Matsubara sum overq 0, the condition (85) can be written more explicitly as 1 4πJ Z csΛuv 0 ϵ dϵp m2 s +ϵ 2 coth hp m2 s +ϵ 2/(2T) i = 1,(86) where J= vuutdet Jxx Jxy Jyx Jyy ! ,(87) is an...

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature518, 179 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Proust and L

    C. Proust and L. Taillefer, The Remarkable Underlying Ground States of Cuprate Supercon- ductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 409 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    P. W. Anderson, The Resonating Valence Bond State in La 2CuO4 and Superconductivity, Science235, 1196 (1987)

    work page 1987

  14. [14]

    F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Effective Hamiltonian for the superconducting Cu oxides, Phys. Rev. B37, 3759 (1988)

    work page 1988

  15. [15]

    M. Qin, T. Sch¨ afer, S. Andergassen, P. Corboz, and E. Gull, The Hubbard Model: A Com- putational Perspective, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.13, 275 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Gunnarsson, T

    O. Gunnarsson, T. Sch¨ afer, J. P. F. LeBlanc, E. Gull, J. Merino, G. Sangiovanni, G. Rohringer, and A. Toschi, Fluctuation Diagnostics of the Electron Self-Energy: Origin of the Pseudogap Physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 236402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Moriya and K

    T. Moriya and K. Ueda, Spin fluctuations and high temperature superconductivity, Adv. Phys.49, 555 (2000)

    work page 2000

  18. [18]

    Y. M. Vilk and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Destruction of Fermi-liquid quasiparticles in two dimensions by critical fluctuations, Europhys. Lett.33, 159 (1996)

    work page 1996

  19. [19]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 17 (2006)

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    K.-Y. Yang, T. M. Rice, and F.-C. Zhang, Phenomenological theory of the pseudogap state, Phys. Rev. B73, 174501 (2006)

    work page 2006

  21. [21]

    Sachdev and D

    S. Sachdev and D. Chowdhury, The novel metallic states of the cuprates: Topological Fermi liquids and strange metals, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2016, 12C102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Chatterjee, S

    S. Chatterjee, S. Sachdev, and A. Eberlein, Thermal and electrical transport in metals and superconductors across antiferromagnetic and topological quantum transitions, Phys. Rev. B 96, 075103 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    M. S. Scheurer, S. Chatterjee, W. Wu, M. Ferrero, A. Georges, and S. Sachdev, Topological order in the pseudogap metal, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA115, E3665 (2018). 38

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    W. Wu, M. S. Scheurer, S. Chatterjee, S. Sachdev, A. Georges, and M. Ferrero, Pseudogap and Fermi-Surface Topology in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. X8, 021048 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Sachdev, H

    S. Sachdev, H. D. Scammell, M. S. Scheurer, and G. Tarnopolsky, Gauge theory for the cuprates near optimal doping, Phys. Rev. B99, 054516 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    P. M. Bonetti and W. Metzner, SU(2) gauge theory of the pseudogap phase in the two- dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B106, 205152 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Forni, P

    P. Forni, P. M. Bonetti, H. M¨ uller-Groeling, D. Vilardi, and W. Metzner, Spin susceptibility in a pseudogap state with fluctuating spiral magnetic order (2025), arXiv:2509.07826 [cond- mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Schulz, Functional Integrals for Correlated Electrons, inThe Hubbard Model, edited by D

    H. Schulz, Functional Integrals for Correlated Electrons, inThe Hubbard Model, edited by D. Baeriswyl (Plenum, New York, 1995)

    work page 1995

  29. [29]

    Dupuis, Spin fluctuations and pseudogap in the two-dimensional half-filled Hubbard model at weak coupling, Phys

    N. Dupuis, Spin fluctuations and pseudogap in the two-dimensional half-filled Hubbard model at weak coupling, Phys. Rev. B65, 245118 (2002)

    work page 2002

  30. [30]

    Borejsza and N

    K. Borejsza and N. Dupuis, Antiferromagnetism and single-particle properties in the two- dimensional half-filled Hubbard model: A nonlinear sigma model approach, Phys. Rev. B69, 085119 (2004)

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    Sachdev, M

    S. Sachdev, M. A. Metlitski, Y. Qi, and C. Xu, Fluctuating spin density waves in metals, Phys. Rev. B80, 155129 (2009)

    work page 2009

  32. [32]

    Eberlein, W

    A. Eberlein, W. Metzner, S. Sachdev, and H. Yamase, Fermi surface reconstruction and drop in the hall number due to spiral antiferromagnetism in high-Tc cuprates, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 187001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Mitscherling and W

    J. Mitscherling and W. Metzner, Longitudinal conductivity and hall coefficient in two- dimensional metals with spiral magnetic order, Phys. Rev. B98, 195126 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    P. M. Bonetti, J. Mitscherling, D. Vilardi, and W. Metzner, Charge carrier drop at the onset of pseudogap behavior in the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B101, 165142 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Zhang and S

    Y.-H. Zhang and S. Sachdev, From the pseudogap metal to the Fermi liquid using ancilla qubits, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023172 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Zhang and S

    Y.-H. Zhang and S. Sachdev, Deconfined criticality and ghost Fermi surfaces at the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal, Phys. Rev. B102, 155124 (2020). 39

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Erratum: Electronic spectra with paramagnon fractionalization in the single-band Hubbard model [Phys. Rev. B <b>105</b> , 075146 (2022)]

    E. Mascot, A. Nikolaenko, M. Tikhanovskaya, Y.-H. Zhang, D. K. Morr, and S. Sachdev, Electronic spectra with paramagnon fractionalization in the single-band Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B105, 075146 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Nikolaenko, J

    A. Nikolaenko, J. von Milczewski, D. G. Joshi, and S. Sachdev, Spin density wave, Fermi liquid, and fractionalized phases in a theory of antiferromagnetic metals using paramagnons and bosonic spinons, Phys. Rev. B108, 045123 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Scholle, P

    R. Scholle, P. M. Bonetti, D. Vilardi, and W. Metzner, Comprehensive mean-field analysis of magnetic and charge orders in the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B108, 035139 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Scholle, W

    R. Scholle, W. Metzner, D. Vilardi, and P. M. Bonetti, Spiral to stripe transition in the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B109, 235149 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Zheng, C.-M

    B.-X. Zheng, C.-M. Chung, P. Corboz, G. Ehlers, M.-P. Qin, R. M. Noack, H. Shi, S. R. White, S. Zhang, and G. K.-L. Chan, Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Science358, 1155 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    E. W. Huang, C. B. Mendl, H.-C. Jiang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Stripe order from the perspective of the Hubbard model, npj Quantum Mater.3, 22 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Qin, C.-M

    M. Qin, C.-M. Chung, H. Shi, E. Vitali, C. Hubig, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang (Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem), Absence of Superconductivity in the Pure Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. X10, 031016 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    H. Xu, H. Shi, E. Vitali, M. Qin, and S. Zhang, Stripes and spin-density waves in the doped two-dimensional Hubbard model: Ground state phase diagram, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013239 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Xu, C.-M

    H. Xu, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model, Science384, eadh7691 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Schl¨ omer, A

    H. Schl¨ omer, A. Bohrdt, and F. Grusdt, Geometric Orthogonal Metals: Hidden Antiferromag- netism and the Pseudogap from Fluctuating Stripes, PRX Quantum6, 030342 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Strange metal and Fermi arcs from disordering spin stripes

    X. Zhang and N. Bultinck, Strange metal and Fermi arcs from disordering spin stripes (2025), arXiv:2507.06309 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, The Hubbard Model, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.13, 239 (2022). 40

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    J. W. Negele and H. Orland,Quantum Many-Particle Systems(Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1987)

    work page 1987

  50. [50]

    P. M. Bonetti, Local Ward identities for collective excitations in fermionic systems with spon- taneously broken symmetries, Phys. Rev. B106, 155105 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Auerbach,Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism(Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994)

    A. Auerbach,Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism(Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994)

    work page 1994

  52. [52]

    J. Wang, A. Eberlein, and W. Metzner, Competing order in correlated electron systems made simple: Consistent fusion of functional renormalization and mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B 89, 121116 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Metzner, M

    W. Metzner, M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, V. Meden, and K. Sch¨ onhammer, Functional renor- malization group approach to correlated fermion systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 299 (2012)

    work page 2012

  54. [54]

    Yamase, A

    H. Yamase, A. Eberlein, and W. Metzner, Coexistence of Incommensurate Magnetism and Su- perconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 096402 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Vilardi, P

    D. Vilardi, P. M. Bonetti, and W. Metzner, Dynamical functional renormalization group computation of order parameters and critical temperatures in the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B102, 245128 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Zaanen and O

    J. Zaanen and O. Gunnarsson, Charged magnetic domain lines and the magnetism of high-T c oxides, Phys. Rev. B40, 7391 (1989)

    work page 1989

  57. [57]

    H. J. Schulz, Domain walls in a doped antiferromagnet, J. Phys. France50, 2833 (1989)

    work page 1989

  58. [58]

    Machida, Magnetism in La 2CuO4 based compounds, Physica C: Superconductivity158, 192 (1989)

    K. Machida, Magnetism in La 2CuO4 based compounds, Physica C: Superconductivity158, 192 (1989)

    work page 1989

  59. [59]

    Poilblanc and T

    D. Poilblanc and T. M. Rice, Charged solitons in the Hartree-Fock approximation to the large-U Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B39, 9749 (1989)

    work page 1989

  60. [60]

    H. J. Schulz, Incommensurate antiferromagnetism in the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 1445 (1990)

    work page 1990

  61. [61]

    M. Kato, K. Machida, H. Nakanishi, and M. Fujita, Soliton Lattice Modulation of Incommen- surate Spin Density Wave in Two Dimensional Hubbard Model -A Mean Field Study, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.59, 1047 (1990)

    work page 1990

  62. [62]

    P. M. Bonetti, Erratum: Local Ward identities for collective excitations in fermionic systems with spontaneously broken symmetries [Phys. Rev. B 106, 155105 (2022)], Phys. Rev. B110, 079902 (2024). 41

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    I. A. Goremykin and A. A. Katanin, Antiferromagnetic and spin spiral correlations in the doped two-dimensional Hubbard model: Gauge symmetry, Ward identities, and dynamical mean-field theory analysis, Phys. Rev. B110, 085153 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Baym and L

    G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff, Conservation Laws and Correlation Functions, Phys. Rev.124, 287 (1961)

    work page 1961

  65. [65]

    Penrose, A generalized inverse for matrices, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society51, 406 (1955)

    R. Penrose, A generalized inverse for matrices, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society51, 406 (1955)

    work page 1955

  66. [66]

    Sachdev, A

    S. Sachdev, A. V. Chubukov, and A. Sokol, Crossover and scaling in a nearly antiferromagnetic Fermi liquid in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B51, 14874 (1995)

    work page 1995

  67. [67]

    Pavarini, I

    E. Pavarini, I. Dasgupta, T. Saha-Dasgupta, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Band-Structure Trend in Hole-Doped Cuprates and Correlation withT cmax, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 047003 (2001)

    work page 2001

  68. [68]

    P. M. Bonetti and W. Metzner, Spin stiffness, spectral weight, and Landau damping of magnons in metallic spiral magnets, Phys. Rev. B105, 134426 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Vilardi, P

    D. Vilardi, P. M. Bonetti, and W. Metzner, Spin stiffnesses and stability of magnetic order in the lightly doped two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B112, 245149 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Damascelli, Z

    A. Damascelli, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Angle-resolved photoemission studies of the cuprate superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 473 (2003)

    work page 2003

  71. [71]

    Harrison and S

    N. Harrison and S. E. Sebastian, Protected Nodal Electron Pocket from Multiple-QOrdering in Underdoped High Temperature Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 226402 (2011)

    work page 2011

  72. [72]

    T. Wu, H. Mayaffre, S. Kr¨ amer, M. Horvati´ c, C. Berthier, W. N. Hardy, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, and M.-H. Julien, Magnetic-field-induced charge-stripe order in the high-temperature superconductor YBa2Cu3Oy, Nature477, 191 (2011)

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    Chang, E

    J. Chang, E. Blackburn, A. T. Holmes, N. B. Christensen, J. Larsen, J. Mesot, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, A. Watenphul, M. v. Zimmermann, E. M. Forgan, and S. M. Hayden, Direct observation of competition between superconductivity and charge density wave order in YBa2Cu3O6.67, Nature Physics8, 871 (2012)

    work page 2012