pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.14532 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Density-Dependent Transition in Bacterial Self-Organization Driven by Confinement and Aerotaxis

Minjun Kim , Joonwoo Jeong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 10:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords bacterial self-organizationaerotaxisconfinementdensity-dependent transitionoxygen gradientwall accumulationdiffusion-advection model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bacterial density decides between symmetric wall accumulation and directed aerotaxis in confined films.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that overall bacterial density in a thin liquid film controls the steady-state pattern formed by aerotactic bacteria under a one-sided oxygen supply. Low densities produce symmetric accumulation at both walls through motility and wall attraction alone. Higher densities activate collective respiration that creates an internal oxygen gradient, switching the dominant behavior to aerotactic migration toward the oxygen-supplying wall. A diffusion-advection model that includes bacterial movement, oxygen transport, wall hydrodynamics, and respiration reproduces the density-dependent switch seen in experiments.

Core claim

The total bacterial number density dictates which mechanism dominates the steady-state spatial distribution: wall accumulation or aerotaxis. At low densities, motile bacteria accumulate at both walls forming a symmetric distribution despite oxygen arriving from one substrate only. Pronounced aerotactic migration toward the oxygen-supplying wall emerges as density increases, driven by a self-generated oxygen gradient from collective respiration.

What carries the argument

The diffusion-advection model of bacteria and oxygen that incorporates aerotactic migration, hydrodynamic attraction to the walls, and respiration.

If this is right

  • Low-density populations form symmetric distributions at all confining surfaces regardless of oxygen source location.
  • Raising density triggers a switch to one-sided accumulation driven by internally produced oxygen gradients.
  • The transition arises from the balance between wall attraction, random motility, and directed aerotactic response.
  • The same model framework accounts for both regimes without additional density-dependent terms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • In natural confined settings such as thin fluid layers or pores, population size alone could toggle bacteria between surface coverage and directed migration.
  • Controlling respiration rate or local oxygen permeability offers a route to steer the transition density in engineered systems.
  • The mechanism may generalize to other self-generated gradients, such as pH or nutrients, in crowded microenvironments.

Load-bearing premise

The high-density asymmetric migration is caused specifically by a self-generated oxygen gradient from collective respiration rather than other density-dependent effects such as crowding-induced motility changes.

What would settle it

Perform the high-density experiment while supplying oxygen equally from both walls or while inhibiting bacterial respiration, then check whether the asymmetric migration to one wall disappears.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.14532 by Joonwoo Jeong, Minjun Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Experimental setup and steady-state bacterial distri [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temporal evolution of the bacterial distribution at high density and a schematic of the system dynamics. (a) PDFs of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison between experimental bacterial distribu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We experimentally investigate how aerotactic bacteria, confined within a thin liquid film between two solid substrates, respond to a controlled oxygen gradient. We find that the total bacterial number density dictates which mechanism dominates the steady-state spatial distribution: wall accumulation or aerotaxis. At low densities, despite receiving oxygen only from one substrate, motile bacteria accumulate at both walls, forming a symmetric distribution. In contrast, pronounced aerotactic migration toward the oxygen-supplying wall emerges as the density increases. Analyzing the temporal evolution of this bacterial distribution reveals that the aerotactic response is driven by a self-generated oxygen gradient induced by collective respiration. Our diffusion-advection model of bacteria and oxygen, accounting for aerotactic migration, hydrodynamic attraction to the walls, and respiration, quantitatively reproduces our experimental observations and provides valuable insights into bacterial self-organization within complex environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper experimentally shows that in aerotactic bacteria confined in a thin liquid film, the total bacterial number density controls the steady-state spatial distribution: symmetric accumulation at both walls at low density versus directed migration to the oxygen-supplying wall at high density. The authors attribute the high-density transition to a self-generated oxygen gradient arising from collective respiration and support this with a diffusion-advection model that incorporates aerotaxis, wall attraction, and respiration, claiming quantitative reproduction of the observed distributions and their temporal evolution.

Significance. If validated, the result clarifies how density modulates the balance between hydrodynamic wall accumulation and aerotactic response in confined bacterial populations, offering a concrete example of collective self-organization driven by self-generated chemical gradients. The quantitative match between the diffusion-advection model and data is a strength, as is the focus on a falsifiable density-dependent switch.

major comments (3)
  1. [Experimental methods] Experimental methods section: no direct measurement of oxygen concentration profiles (via microelectrodes or O2-sensitive dyes) is reported at varying bacterial densities. Without this, the claim that the aerotactic migration is driven by a self-generated oxygen gradient remains an inference from model agreement rather than an independent test.
  2. [Modeling section] Modeling section: motility parameters (swimming speed, rotational diffusion) are taken as density-independent. If crowding alters these parameters, the same spatial transition could arise without invoking an oxygen gradient; the manuscript provides no control experiments or literature justification for this assumption.
  3. [Results] Results on temporal evolution: while the model reproduces the time course, the data do not isolate the oxygen-gradient mechanism from other density-dependent effects such as changes in motility or hydrodynamic interactions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the number of independent replicates and error bars used for each density condition.
  2. [Abstract and Results] The abstract states the model 'quantitatively reproduces' the data; the main text should report the fitting procedure, parameter values, and goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., R² or residual norms) to allow assessment of whether the agreement is predictive or post-hoc.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the work and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the strength of our evidence. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental methods] Experimental methods section: no direct measurement of oxygen concentration profiles (via microelectrodes or O2-sensitive dyes) is reported at varying bacterial densities. Without this, the claim that the aerotactic migration is driven by a self-generated oxygen gradient remains an inference from model agreement rather than an independent test.

    Authors: We agree that direct oxygen measurements would constitute stronger independent evidence. In our thin-film geometry (~10 μm thickness), however, insertion of microelectrodes risks perturbing the confinement and flow, while O2-sensitive dyes can alter motility or introduce phototoxicity. We therefore relied on the quantitative match between the diffusion-advection model and both steady-state profiles and their temporal evolution. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit paragraph discussing this technical limitation, citing related aerotaxis studies that similarly infer gradients from collective dynamics and modeling, and note that future work could employ non-invasive optical methods. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Modeling section] Modeling section: motility parameters (swimming speed, rotational diffusion) are taken as density-independent. If crowding alters these parameters, the same spatial transition could arise without invoking an oxygen gradient; the manuscript provides no control experiments or literature justification for this assumption.

    Authors: The experimental densities (10^7–10^9 cells ml⁻¹) lie below the jamming threshold where motility parameters of Bacillus subtilis are known to change appreciably (see e.g. literature on bacterial suspensions). We will insert a short justification paragraph in the modeling section together with the relevant citations. Dedicated controls that vary density while holding oxygen availability fixed are experimentally difficult in the confined geometry; nevertheless, the model reproduces the sharp, one-sided transition without any density-dependent adjustment of motility parameters, which would be unlikely if crowding alone were responsible. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Results] Results on temporal evolution: while the model reproduces the time course, the data do not isolate the oxygen-gradient mechanism from other density-dependent effects such as changes in motility or hydrodynamic interactions.

    Authors: The observed delay before directed migration begins at high density matches the characteristic time for oxygen depletion by collective respiration, a signature not expected from density-dependent motility or hydrodynamics alone. The model, containing only aerotaxis to a self-generated gradient plus wall attraction, reproduces both the timing and the final one-sided distribution. Alternative mechanisms would not naturally produce accumulation exclusively at the oxygen-supplying wall. In the revision we will expand the temporal-analysis discussion to emphasize these distinguishing features. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports experimental observations of density-dependent transitions in bacterial distributions under confinement and oxygen gradients, then introduces a diffusion-advection model incorporating aerotactic migration, wall attraction, and respiration that is stated to reproduce the data. No equations or steps are shown where a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, where a result is defined in terms of itself, or where a load-bearing claim reduces by construction to a self-citation or ansatz. The temporal-evolution analysis is presented as an independent indicator of the self-generated gradient mechanism, and the model is described as accounting for known physical processes rather than being tuned tautologically to the steady-state profiles alone. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against the external experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard diffusion and advection equations plus three fitted quantities: aerotactic sensitivity coefficient, wall-attraction strength, and bacterial respiration rate. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • aerotactic sensitivity
    Coefficient that converts local oxygen gradient into directed velocity; must be adjusted to match observed migration speed.
  • wall attraction strength
    Hydrodynamic parameter controlling accumulation at both boundaries at low density.
  • respiration rate per cell
    Rate at which bacteria consume oxygen; determines how strongly the gradient is self-generated at high density.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Bacterial motion is described by diffusion plus advection in an oxygen field
    Standard continuum model for motile bacteria; invoked in the modeling section.
  • domain assumption Oxygen transport follows diffusion with consumption proportional to local bacterial density
    Classic reaction-diffusion description of oxygen in bacterial suspensions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5436 in / 1255 out tokens · 37538 ms · 2026-05-15T10:54:37.343379+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fenchel, Microbial behavior in a heterogeneous world, Science296, 1068 (2002)

    T. Fenchel, Microbial behavior in a heterogeneous world, Science296, 1068 (2002)

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    M. R. Spratt and K. Lane, Navigating environmental transitions: The role of phenotypic variation in bacterial responses, mBio13, e02212 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    J. M. Keegstra, F. Carrara, and R. Stocker, The ecologi- cal roles of bacterial chemotaxis, Nature Reviews Micro- biology20, 491 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Piskovsky and N

    V. Piskovsky and N. M. Oliveira, Bacterial motility can govern the dynamics of antibiotic resistance evolution, Nature Communications14, 5584 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Porter, C

    R. Porter, C. Trenado-Yuste, A. Martinez-Calvo, M. Su, N. S. Wingreen, S. S. Datta, and K. C. Huang, On the growth and form of bacterial colonies, Nature Reviews Physics7, 535 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Sokolov, R

    A. Sokolov, R. E. Goldstein, F. I. Feldchtein, and I. S. Aranson, Enhanced mixing and spatial instability in con- centrated bacterial suspensions, Physical Review E80, 031903 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [8]

    Douarche, A

    C. Douarche, A. Buguin, H. Salman, and A. Libchaber, E. coliand oxygen: A motility transition, Physical Re- view Letters102, 198101 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [9]

    Bouvard, C

    J. Bouvard, C. Douarche, P. Mergaert, H. Auradou, and F. Moisy, Direct measurement of the aerotactic response in a bacterial suspension, Physical Review E106, 034404 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [10]

    B. C. Mazzag, I. B. Zhulin, and A. Mogilner, Model of bacterial band formation in aerotaxis, Biophysical Jour- nal85, 3558 (2003)

    work page 2003

  10. [11]

    Menolascina, R

    F. Menolascina, R. Rusconi, V. I. Fernandez, S. Smriga, Z. Aminzare, E. D. Sontag, and R. Stocker, Logarithmic sensing inBacillus subtilisaerotaxis, npj Systems Biol- ogy and Applications3, 16036 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [12]

    A. P. Berke, L. Turner, H. C. Berg, and E. Lauga, Hy- drodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces, Physical Review Letters101, 038102 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [13]

    Li and J

    G. Li and J. X. Tang, Accumulation of microswim- mers near a surface mediated by collision and rotational Brownian motion, Physical Review Letters103, 078101 (2009)

    work page 2009

  13. [15]

    Sartori, E

    P. Sartori, E. Chiarello, G. Jayaswal, M. Pierno, G. Mis- tura, P. Brun, A. Tiribocchi, and E. Orlandini, Wall ac- cumulation of bacteria with different motility patterns, Physical Review E97, 022610 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [16]

    Junot, T

    G. Junot, T. Darnige, A. Lindner, V. A. Martinez, J. Arlt, A. Dawson, W. C. K. Poon, H. Auradou, and ´E. Cl´ ement, Run-to-tumble variability controls the sur- face residence times ofE. colibacteria, Physical Review Letters128, 248101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [17]

    C. Li, H. Bian, Y. Qiao, J. Zhu, and Z. Qu, Hydrody- namic interaction leads to the accumulation ofChlamy- domonas reinhardtiinear a solid–liquid interface, Physi- cal Review E111, L052401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [18]

    J. C. Conrad, Physics of bacterial near-surface motility using flagella and type IV pili: implications for biofilm formation, Research in Microbiology163, 619 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [19]

    C. A. Fux, J. W. Costerton, P. S. Stewart, and P. Stood- ley, Survival strategies of infectious biofilms, Trends in Microbiology13, 34 (2005)

    work page 2005

  18. [20]

    H. H. Tuson and D. B. Weibel, Bacteria–surface interac- tions, Soft Matter9, 4368 (2013)

    work page 2013

  19. [21]

    G. Jing, A. Z¨ ottl,´E. Cl´ ement, and A. Lindner, Chirality- induced bacterial rheotaxis in bulk shear flows, Science Advances6, eabb2012 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [22]

    Ramamonjy, J

    A. Ramamonjy, J. Dervaux, and P. Brunet, Nonlin- ear phototaxis and instabilities in suspensions of light- seeking algae, Physical Review Letters128, 258101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [23]

    Carr` ere, J

    A. Carr` ere, J. d’Alessandro, O. Cochet-Escartin, J. Hes- nard, N. Ghazi, C. Rivi` ere, C. Anjard, F. Detcheverry, and J.-P. Rieu, Microphase separation of living cells, Na- ture Communications14, 796 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [24]

    Prakash, Y

    P. Prakash, Y. Baig, F. J. Peaudecerf, and R. E. Gold- stein, Dynamics of an algae–bacteria microcosm: Photo- synthesis, chemotaxis, and expulsion in inhomogeneous active matter, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2410225122 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [25]

    Eisenmann, M

    I. Eisenmann, M. Vona, N. Desprat, T. Ishikawa, E. Lauga, and R. Jeanneret, Pure hydrodynamic instabil- ities in active jets of puller microalgae, Physical Review Letters135, 198301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [26]

    Rothschild, Non-random Distribution of Bull Spermato- zoa in a Drop of Sperm Suspension, Nature198, 1221 (1963)

    work page 1963

  25. [27]

    Vladescu, E

    I. Vladescu, E. Marsden, J. Schwarz-Linek, V. Martinez, J. Arlt, A. Morozov, D. Marenduzzo, M. Cates, and W. Poon, Filling an emulsion drop with motile bacteria, Physical Review Letters113, 268101 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [28]

    Wioland, F

    H. Wioland, F. G. Woodhouse, J. Dunkel, J. O. Kessler, and R. E. Goldstein, Confinement Stabilizes a Bacterial Suspension into a Spiral Vortex, Physical Review Letters 110, 268102 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [29]

    Nishiguchi, I

    D. Nishiguchi, I. S. Aranson, A. Snezhko, and A. Sokolov, Engineering bacterial vortex lattice via direct laser lithography, Nature Communications9, 4486 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [30]

    H. Xu, J. Dauparas, D. Das, E. Lauga, and Y. Wu, Self- organization of swimmers drives long-range fluid trans- port in bacterial colonies, Nature Communications10, 1792 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [31]

    S. E. Hulme, W. R. DiLuzio, S. S. Shevkoplyas, L. Turner, M. Mayer, H. C. Berg, and G. M. Whitesides, Using ratchets and sorters to fractionate motile cells of Escherichia coliby length, Lab on a Chip8, 1888 (2008)

    work page 2008

  30. [32]

    Lambert, D

    G. Lambert, D. Liao, and R. H. Austin, Collective escape of chemotactic swimmers through microscopic ratchets, Physical Review Letters104, 168102 (2010)

    work page 2010

  31. [33]

    Denissenko, V

    P. Denissenko, V. Kantsler, D. J. Smith, and J. Kirkman- Brown, Human spermatozoa migration in microchan- nels reveals boundary-following navigation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109, 8007 (2012). 7

    work page 2012

  32. [34]

    Coppola and V

    S. Coppola and V. Kantsler, Curved ratchets improve bacteria rectification in microfluidic devices, Physical Re- view E104, 014602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [35]

    Anand, X

    S. Anand, X. Ma, S. Guo, S. Martiniani, and X. Cheng, Transport and energetics of bacterial rectification, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2411608121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [36]

    Adler, M

    M. Adler, M. Erickstad, E. Gutierrez, and A. Groisman, Studies of bacterial aerotaxis in a microfluidic device, Lab on a Chip12, 4835 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [37]

    N. M. Oliveira, K. R. Foster, and W. M. Durham, Single- cell twitching chemotaxis in developing biofilms, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 6532 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [38]

    M. M. Salek, F. Carrara, V. Fernandez, J. S. Guasto, and R. Stocker, Bacterial chemotaxis in a microfluidic T-maze reveals strong phenotypic heterogeneity in chemotactic sensitivity, Nature Communications10, 10.1038/s41467- 019-09521-2 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467- 2019

  37. [39]

    T. V. Phan, H. H. Mattingly, L. Vo, J. S. Marvin, L. L. Looger, and T. Emonet, Direct measurement of dynamic attractant gradients reveals breakdown of the Patlak– Keller–Segel chemotaxis model, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences121, e2309251121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [40]

    Adler, Chemotaxis in bacteria: MotileEscherichia coli migrate in bands that are influenced by oxygen and or- ganic nutrients., Science153, 708 (1966)

    J. Adler, Chemotaxis in bacteria: MotileEscherichia coli migrate in bands that are influenced by oxygen and or- ganic nutrients., Science153, 708 (1966)

    work page 1966

  39. [41]

    I. B. Zhulin, V. A. Bespalov, M. S. Johnson, and B. L. Taylor, Oxygen taxis and proton motive force inAzospirillum brasilense, Journal of Bacteriology178, 5199 (1996)

    work page 1996

  40. [43]

    Jin and A

    C. Jin and A. Sengupta, Microbes in porous environ- ments: from active interactions to emergent feedback, Biophysical Reviews16, 173 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [44]

    Bhattacharjee, D

    T. Bhattacharjee, D. B. Amchin, J. A. Ott, F. Kratz, and S. S. Datta, Chemotactic migration of bacteria in porous media, Biophysical Journal120, 3483 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [45]

    Aleklett, E

    K. Aleklett, E. T. Kiers, P. Ohlsson, T. S. Shimizu, V. E. A. Caldas, and E. C. Hammer, Build your own soil: exploring microfluidics to create microbial habitat structures, The ISME Journal12, 312 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [46]

    S. E. Spagnolie and E. Lauga, Hydrodynamics of self- propulsion near a boundary: predictions and accuracy of far-field approximations, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 700, 105 (2012)

    work page 2012

  44. [47]

    B. V. Hokmabad, A. Mart´ ınez-Calvo, S. Gonzalez La Corte, and S. S. Datta, Spatial self-organization of confined bacterial suspensions, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences122, e2503983122 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [48]

    E. F. Keller and L. A. Segel, Model for chemotaxis, Jour- nal of Theoretical Biology30, 225 (1971)

    work page 1971

  46. [49]

    E. F. Keller and L. A. Segel, Traveling bands of chemo- tactic bacteria: A theoretical analysis, Journal of Theo- retical Biology30, 235 (1971)

    work page 1971

  47. [50]

    Zhang, J

    W. Zhang, J. S. Olson, and G. N. Phillips Jr., Biophysi- cal and kinetic characterization of HemAT, an aerotaxis receptor fromBacillus subtilis, Biophysical Journal88, 2801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  48. [51]

    Y. Tu, T. S. Shimizu, and H. C. Berg, Modeling the chemotactic response ofEscherichia colito time-varying stimuli, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 14855 (2008)

    work page 2008

  49. [53]

    L. H. Cisneros, J. O. Kessler, R. Ortiz, R. Cortez, and M. A. Bees, Unexpected bipolar flagellar arrangements and long-range flows driven by bacteria near solid bound- aries, Physical Review Letters101, 168102 (2008)

    work page 2008

  50. [54]

    B. Zhao, E. Lauga, and L. Koens, Method of regular- ized Stokeslets: Flow analysis and improvement of con- vergence, Physical Review Fluids4, 084104 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [55]

    A. G. Prabhune, A. S. Garc´ ıa-Gordillo, I. S. Aranson, T. R. Powers, and N. Figueroa-Morales, Bacteria navi- gate anisotropic media using a flagellar tug-of-oars, PRX Life2, 033004 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [56]

    Tuval, L

    I. Tuval, L. Cisneros, C. Dombrowski, C. W. Wolgemuth, J. O. Kessler, and R. E. Goldstein, Bacterial swimming and oxygen transport near contact lines, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America102, 2277 (2005)

    work page 2005

  53. [57]

    Cheon, J

    J. Cheon, J. Son, S. Lim, Y. Jeong, J.-H. Park, R. J. Mitchell, J. U. Kim, and J. Jeong, Motile bacteria crossing liquid–liquid interfaces of an aqueous isotropic– nematic coexistence phase, Soft Matter20, 7313 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [58]

    Najafi, F

    J. Najafi, F. Altegoer, G. Bange, and C. Wagner, Swim- ming of bacteriumBacillus subtiliswith multiple bundles of flagella, Soft Matter15, 10029 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [59]

    Yanaoka and T

    H. Yanaoka and T. Nishimura, Pattern wavelengths and transport characteristics in three-dimensional bioconvec- tion generated by chemotactic bacteria, Journal of Fluid Mechanics952, A13 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [60]

    Gallardo-Navarro, R

    O. Gallardo-Navarro, R. Arbel-Goren, E. August, G. Olmedo-Alvarez, and J. Stavans, Dynamically induced spatial segregation in multispecies bacterial bioconvec- tion, Nature Communications16, 950 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [61]

    Shoup and T

    D. Shoup and T. Ursell, Bacterial bioconvection confers context-dependent growth benefits and is robust under varying metabolic and genetic conditions, Journal of Bac- teriology205, e00232 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [64]

    Henkel Corporation,Safety Data Sheet: Loctite Epoxy Quick Set Multi-purpose 5 Minute Hardener, Henkel Cor- poration, Rocky Hill, Connecticut, USA (2025), iDH number: 1427689, Revision Number: 005.0

    work page 2025

  59. [65]

    Density-Dependent Transition in Bacterial Self-Organization Driven by Confinement and Aerotaxis

    R. Nock and F. Nielsen, Statistical region merging, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli- gence26, 1452 (2004). Supplemental Materials for “Density-Dependent Transition in Bacterial Self-Organization Driven by Confinement and Aerotaxis” Minjun Kim 1 and Joonwoo Jeong 1, 2,∗ 1Department of Physics, Ulsan National Institute of Science a...

    work page 2004

  60. [66]

    Sokolov, R

    A. Sokolov, R. E. Goldstein, F. I. Feldchtein, and I. S. Aranson, Enhanced mixing and spatial instability in concentrated bacterial suspensions, Physical Review E80, 031903 (2009)

    work page 2009

  61. [67]

    Ezhilan, A

    B. Ezhilan, A. A. Pahlavan, and D. Saintillan, Chaotic dynamics and oxygen transport in thin films of aerotactic bacteria, Physics of Fluids24, 091701 (2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [68]

    G. A. Bodhankar, P. Tohidifar, Z. L. Foust, G. W. Ordal, and C. V. Rao, Characterization of opposing responses to phenol byBacillus subtilischemoreceptors, Journal of Bacteriology204, e00441 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [69]

    Henkel Corporation,Safety Data Sheet: Loctite Epoxy Quick Set Multi-purpose 5 Minute Hardener, Henkel Corporation, Rocky Hill, Connecticut, USA (2025), iDH number: 1427689, Revision Number: 005.0

    work page 2025

  64. [70]

    B. C. Mazzag, I. B. Zhulin, and A. Mogilner, Model of bacterial band formation in aerotaxis, Biophysical Journal85, 3558 (2003)

    work page 2003

  65. [71]

    Detcheverry, Exact model of aerotactic band: From Fokker-Planck equation to band structure and fluid flow, Physical Review E112, 065409 (2025)

    F. Detcheverry, Exact model of aerotactic band: From Fokker-Planck equation to band structure and fluid flow, Physical Review E112, 065409 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [72]

    Menolascina, R

    F. Menolascina, R. Rusconi, V. I. Fernandez, S. Smriga, Z. Aminzare, E. D. Sontag, and R. Stocker, Logarithmic sensing inBacillus subtilisaerotaxis, npj Systems Biology and Applications3, 16036 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [73]

    Y. Tu, T. S. Shimizu, and H. C. Berg, Modeling the chemotactic response ofEscherichia colito time-varying stimuli, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105, 14855 (2008)

    work page 2008

  68. [74]

    T. V. Phan, H. H. Mattingly, L. Vo, J. S. Marvin, L. L. Looger, and T. Emonet, Direct measurement of dynamic attractant gradients reveals breakdown of the Patlak–Keller–Segel chemotaxis model, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2309251121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [75]

    Li and J

    G. Li and J. X. Tang, Accumulation of microswimmers near a surface mediated by collision and rotational Brownian motion, Physical Review Letters103, 078101 (2009)

    work page 2009

  70. [76]

    Sartori, E

    P. Sartori, E. Chiarello, G. Jayaswal, M. Pierno, G. Mistura, P. Brun, A. Tiribocchi, and E. Orlandini, Wall accumulation of bacteria with different motility patterns, Physical Review E97, 022610 (2018)

    work page 2018

  71. [77]

    Molaei, M

    M. Molaei, M. Barry, R. Stocker, and J. Sheng, Failed escape: Solid surfaces prevent tumbling ofEscherichia coli, Physical Review Letters113, 068103 (2014)

    work page 2014

  72. [78]

    A. P. Berke, L. Turner, H. C. Berg, and E. Lauga, Hydrodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces, Physical Review Letters101, 038102 (2008)

    work page 2008

  73. [79]

    Ainley, S

    J. Ainley, S. Durkin, R. Embid, P. Boindala, and R. Cortez, The method of images for regularized Stokeslets, Journal of Computational Physics227, 4600 (2008)

    work page 2008

  74. [80]

    B. Zhao, E. Lauga, and L. Koens, Method of regularized Stokeslets: Flow analysis and improvement of convergence, Physical Review Fluids4, 084104 (2019)

    work page 2019

  75. [81]

    Yanaoka and T

    H. Yanaoka and T. Nishimura, Pattern wavelengths and transport characteristics in three-dimensional bioconvection gen- erated by chemotactic bacteria, Journal of Fluid Mechanics952, A13 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [82]

    Gallardo-Navarro, R

    O. Gallardo-Navarro, R. Arbel-Goren, E. August, G. Olmedo-Alvarez, and J. Stavans, Dynamically induced spatial segre- gation in multispecies bacterial bioconvection, Nature Communications16, 950 (2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [83]

    Shoup and T

    D. Shoup and T. Ursell, Bacterial bioconvection confers context-dependent growth benefits and is robust under varying metabolic and genetic conditions, Journal of Bacteriology205, e00232 (2023). S7

    work page 2023

  78. [84]

    D. Wei, S. Hu, T. Tang, Y. Yang, F. Meng, and Y. Peng, Confinement reduces surface accumulation of swimming bacteria, Physical Review Letters135, 188401 (2025)

    work page 2025