pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.16656 · v3 · submitted 2026-03-17 · ⚛️ physics.optics · astro-ph.IM

Designing a low-loss high reflectivity mirror for gravitational waves detectors by combining a dielectric metasurface and a multilayer stack

Edith Hartmann , Michel Lequime , Jerome Degallaix , Michael T. Hartman , Paul Rouquette , Claude Amra , Myriam Zerrad This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 09:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics astro-ph.IM
keywords metasurfacemultilayer stackgravitational wave detectorsthermal noisehigh reflectivitydielectric mirrorTiO2 Ta2O5coating design
0
0 comments X

The pith

A resonant metasurface paired with a shortened multilayer stack delivers the high reflectivity needed for gravitational-wave mirrors while cutting the thickness of the highest-thermal-noise material by more than three times.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a hybrid mirror that combines a resonant dielectric metasurface with a conventional multilayer stack to reach the ultra-high reflectivity required by interferometric gravitational-wave detectors. Standard all-multilayer coatings need many layers to hit that reflectivity, but the thickest layers use TiO2:Ta2O5, the material that dominates thermal noise. By letting the metasurface supply part of the reflection, the design trims the total thickness of TiO2:Ta2O5 by a factor greater than three while still meeting the reflectivity target. The result is a concrete route to lower thermal noise without abandoning the mature multilayer technology.

Core claim

The central claim is that a properly designed resonant metasurface can be added to a reduced multilayer stack so that the combined structure still provides the reflectivity demanded by gravitational-wave interferometers, yet the total physical thickness of the TiO2:Ta2O5 layers drops by more than a factor of three.

What carries the argument

Resonant dielectric metasurface integrated with a shortened multilayer dielectric stack; the metasurface supplies additional phase and amplitude control that compensates for the missing layers.

If this is right

  • The hybrid mirror meets the reflectivity specification of current gravitational-wave detectors.
  • Total thickness of TiO2:Ta2O5 drops by more than a factor of three compared with a standard high-reflectivity stack.
  • Thermal noise arising from the coating is expected to decrease in proportion to the reduced thickness of the high-loss material.
  • The approach preserves compatibility with existing deposition processes for the remaining multilayer films.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the metasurface can be made with the same surface quality as the multilayer, the same design principle could be applied to other high-reflectivity optics that suffer from coating noise.
  • The thickness reduction opens a direct path to testing whether thermal-noise scaling remains linear down to these thinner configurations in real interferometers.
  • Further optimization of the metasurface resonance could allow even fewer conventional layers, potentially extending the technique to mirrors that must also satisfy strict mechanical-loss budgets.

Load-bearing premise

The resonant metasurface can be fabricated on top of the shortened stack without adding scattering losses, mechanical stress, or defects large enough to erase the thermal-noise benefit.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of a fabricated prototype that shows either reflectivity below the required threshold or excess optical and mechanical losses that cancel the expected reduction in thermal noise.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.16656 by Claude Amra, Edith Hartmann, Jerome Degallaix, Michael T. Hartman, Michel Lequime, Myriam Zerrad, Paul Rouquette.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: b]. This system functions as a Fabry-Perot in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schemes of the different mirror designs: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) Definition of the metasurface geometric parameters; Metasurface reflectivity dependence on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (a) Influence of the amorphous silicon extinction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Assembly transmittance as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The design of new low-mechanical-loss, high reflectivity mirrors is crucial in the development of the next generation of gravitational-wave observatories. Currently, the state-of-the-art amorphous multilayer reflective coatings which are deposited at the surface of the test masses in interferometric gravitational-wave detectors present the limiting factor in detector sensitivity due to their thermal noise. These coatings require a large number of thin layers to achieve ultra-high reflectivity. However, the thermal noise generated by this type of stack increases with the number of layers used. These dielectric mirrors represent a very mature technology, with current research producing only incremental improvements, highlighting the need for new technical solutions that can address this specific issue. Here, we provide insights into the expected performance of mirrors that combine a resonant metasurface with a multilayer stack. The suggested mirror design ensures the high reflectivity required for interferometric gravitational wave detectors, while using fewer layers of properly selected materials. It allows to reduce the total thickness of the material with the poorest thermal-noise performance, namely TiO2:Ta2O5, by a factor of more than 3, making it a promising option for reducing thermal noise as well

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a hybrid mirror design for gravitational-wave detectors that integrates a resonant dielectric metasurface with a shortened multilayer dielectric stack. The central claim is that this structure maintains the ultra-high reflectivity (>99.999%) required for interferometric detectors while reducing the total thickness of the high-loss TiO2:Ta2O5 material by more than a factor of three relative to conventional coatings, thereby lowering coating thermal noise.

Significance. If the performance claims are substantiated, the approach could provide a practical route to reducing thermal noise in next-generation GW observatories by minimizing the contribution from the poorest-performing material without sacrificing reflectivity. It extends mature multilayer technology with a metasurface compensation layer rather than requiring entirely new low-loss materials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Design section (around the RCWA/FDTD results)] The headline claim of >3× reduction in TiO2:Ta2O5 thickness requires the metasurface to exactly compensate for the removed quarter-wave pairs via resonance. No tolerance study (etch-depth variation, period disorder, surface roughness) is presented to show that scattering remains below a few ppm and reflectivity above 99.999% under realistic fabrication conditions; ideal-periodic simulations therefore leave the thermal-noise benefit unproven.
  2. [Results and discussion] No quantitative thermal-noise calculation is given that folds in any additional scattering or absorption introduced by the metasurface integration; the net noise reduction relative to the standard stack therefore cannot be verified from the presented data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'properly selected materials' without naming the refractive indices or layer sequence used in the shortened stack.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions should explicitly state the number of layers and total TiO2:Ta2O5 thickness for both the reference and hybrid designs to allow immediate comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We agree that additional analysis is needed to strengthen the claims regarding fabrication robustness and net thermal-noise performance. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The headline claim of >3× reduction in TiO2:Ta2O5 thickness requires the metasurface to exactly compensate for the removed quarter-wave pairs via resonance. No tolerance study (etch-depth variation, period disorder, surface roughness) is presented to show that scattering remains below a few ppm and reflectivity above 99.999% under realistic fabrication conditions; ideal-periodic simulations therefore leave the thermal-noise benefit unproven.

    Authors: We agree that a tolerance analysis is essential to substantiate the practical feasibility of the >3× thickness reduction. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in the Design section presenting RCWA-based tolerance studies. These will quantify the effects of etch-depth variation (±5 nm), period disorder (up to 1%), and surface roughness (RMS < 0.5 nm) on reflectivity and scattering loss, demonstrating that >99.999% reflectivity and scattering below a few ppm can be maintained under realistic fabrication conditions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No quantitative thermal-noise calculation is given that folds in any additional scattering or absorption introduced by the metasurface integration; the net noise reduction relative to the standard stack therefore cannot be verified from the presented data.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript lacks a full thermal-noise budget that includes metasurface-induced losses. In the revised Results and Discussion section we will provide a quantitative coating thermal-noise calculation. This will incorporate estimated additional scattering and absorption from the metasurface (derived from the new tolerance studies) into the standard Brownian-noise model and directly compare the net noise reduction against a conventional 30-layer TiO2:Ta2O5/SiO2 stack. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: hybrid mirror design uses standard EM simulation without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper presents a conceptual design combining a resonant metasurface with a shortened dielectric stack to reduce TiO2:Ta2O5 thickness by >3x while targeting >99.999% reflectivity. Performance claims rest on conventional RCWA/FDTD-style calculations of the combined structure, not on any parameter fitted to the target reflectivity or on a self-citation that defines the result. No equation is shown to be equivalent to its input by construction, and the central claim (thermal-noise benefit from fewer layers) remains an independent prediction subject to fabrication validation. This is the expected non-finding for a design-concept paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The design rests on standard electromagnetic theory for dielectric multilayers and metasurface resonances; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Electromagnetic wave propagation and interference in stratified dielectric media follow standard Fresnel and transfer-matrix formalisms.
    Implicit in any multilayer reflectivity calculation.
  • domain assumption Resonant metasurfaces can be modeled with effective-medium or rigorous coupled-wave analysis without additional loss channels.
    Required for the hybrid design to maintain high reflectivity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1315 out tokens · 39558 ms · 2026-05-15T09:51:04.789913+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott and the LIGO Scientific Collaboration, ”Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Degallaix, C

    J. Degallaix, C. Michel, B. Sassolas, A. Allocca, G. Cagnoli, L. Balzarini, V. Dolique, R. Flaminio, D. Forest, M. Granata, B. Lagrange, N. Straniero, J. Teillon, and L. Pinard, ”TLarge and extremely low loss: the unique challenges of gravitational wave mirrors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A36, C85-C94 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Titania-doped Tantala/Silica coatings for gravitational-wave detection,

    G.M. Harry, M.R. Abernathy, A.E. Becerra-Toledo, H. Armandula, E. Black, K. Dooley, M. Eichenfield, C. Nwabugwu, A. Villar, D.R.M. Crooks, G. Cagnoli, J. Hough, C.R. How, I. MacLaren, P. Murray, S. Reid, S. Rowan, P.H. Sneddon, M.M. Fejer, R. Route, S.D. Penn, P. Ganau, J. Mackowski, C. Michel, L. Pinard and A. Remillieu., “Titania-doped Tantala/Silica co...

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Principe, ”Reflective coating optimization for interfer- ometric detectors of gravitational waves,” Opt

    M. Principe, ”Reflective coating optimization for interfer- ometric detectors of gravitational waves,” Opt. Express 23, 10938-10956 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    S. C. Tait, J. Steinlechner, M. M. Kinley-Hanlon, P. G. Murray, J. Hough, G. McGhee, F. Pein, S. Rowan, R. Schnabel, C. Smith, L. Terkowski, and I. W. Martin, ”Demonstration of the Multimaterial Coating Concept to Reduce Thermal Noise in Gravitational-Wave Detec- tors,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 011102 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    G. I. McGhee, V. Spagnuolo, N. Demos, S. C. Tait, P. G. Murray, M. Chicoine, P. Dabadie, S. Gras, J. Hough, G. A. Iandolo, R. Johnston, V. Martinez, O. Patane, S. Rowan, F. Schiettekatte, J. R. Smith, L. Terkowski, L. Zhang, M. Evans, I. W. Martin, and J. Steinlechner, ”Ti- tania Mixed with Silica: A Low Thermal-Noise Coating Material for Gravitational-Wa...

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Davenport, G

    A. Davenport, G. Vajente, N. Demos, A. Markosyan, S. Tait, M. M. Fejer, S. Gras, M. Evans, and C. S. Menoni, ”Minimization of Coating Thermal Noise in TiO2:GeO2 and SiO2 High Reflector Stacks for Gravitational Wave Detectors,” inOptica OIC — Optical Interference Coat- ings Conference 2025, Technical Digest Series (Optica Publishing Group, 2025), paper FA.4

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Tenfold reduction of Brownian noise in high-reflectivity optical coatings,

    G. D. Cole, W. Zhang, M. Martin, J. Ye, M. Aspelmeyer, “Tenfold reduction of Brownian noise in high-reflectivity optical coatings,” Nat. Photonics7, 644–650 (2013). 6

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    E. M. Gretarsson, A. M. Gretarsson, A. Juston, G. D. Cole, G. M. Harry, S. D. Penn, and B. N. Meagher, ”GaAs/Al0.92Ga0.08 As Crystalline Coatings in Grav- itational Wave Detectors,” inOptica OIC — Optical In- terference Coatings Conference 2025, Technical Digest Series (Optica Publishing Group, 2025), paper FA.6

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Koroveshi, L

    X. Koroveshi, L. Busch, E.Majorana, P.Puppo, P.Rapagnani, F.Ricci, P.Ruggi, S.Grohmann, ”Cryogenic payloads for the Einstein Telescope: Baseline design with heat extraction, suspension thermal noise modeling, and sensitivity analyses,” Phys. Rev. D108, 123009 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Akutsu and the Scientific KAGRA Collaboration, ”KAGRA: 2.5 generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,” Nat

    T. Akutsu and the Scientific KAGRA Collaboration, ”KAGRA: 2.5 generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,” Nat. Astron.3, 35-40 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Genevet, F

    P. Genevet, F. Capasso, F. Aieta, M. Khorasaninejad, and R. Devlin, ”Recent advances in planar optics: from plasmonic to dielectric metasurfaces,” Optica4, 139-152 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    A. I. Kuznetsov, M. L. Brongersma, J. Yao, M. K. Chen, U. Levy, D. P. Tsai, N. I. Zheludev, A. Faraon, A. Arbabi, N. Yu, D. Chanda, K. B. Crozier, A. V. Kildishev, H. Wang, J. K.W. Yang, J. G. Valentine, P. Genevet, J. A. Fan, O. D. Miller, A. Majumdar, J. E. Fr¨ och, D. Brady, F. Heide, A. Veeraraghavan, N. Engheta, A. Al` u, A. Polman, H. A. Atwater, P....

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Br¨ uckner, D

    F. Br¨ uckner, D. Friedrich, T. Clausnitzer, M. Britzger, Ol. Burmeister, K. Danzmann, E.-B. Kley, A. T¨ unnermann, and R. Schnabel, ”Realization of a Mono- lithic High-Reflectivity Cavity Mirror from a Single Sili- con Crystal,” Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 163903 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Matiushechkina, A

    M. Matiushechkina, A. B. Evlyukhin, V. A. Zenin, M. Heurs, B. N. Chichkov, ”High-efficiency silicon metasur- face mirror on a sapphire substrate,” Opt. Mater.138, 113618 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    U. D. Zeitner, M. Banasch, and M. Trost, ”Potential of E- beam lithography for micro- and nano-optics fabrication on large areas,” J. Micro/Nanopattern. Mater. Metrol. 22, 041405 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    J.-S. Park, S. W. D. Lim, A. Amirzhan, H. Kang, K. Kar- rfalt, D. Kim, J. Leger, A. Urbas, M. Ossiander, Z. Li, F. Capasso, ”All-Glass 100 mm Diameter Visible Metal- ens for Imaging the Cosmos,” ACS Nano.18, 3187-3198 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Matiushechkina, A

    M. Matiushechkina, A. B. Evlyukhin, R. Malureanu, V. A. Zenin, T. Yezekyan, A. Lavrinenko, S. I. Bozhevol- nyi, B. N. Chichkov, M. Heurs, ”Design and Experimen- tal Demonstration of Wavelength-Selective Metamirrors on Sapphire Substrates,” Adv. Photon. Res.6, 2400116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Dickmann, S

    J. Dickmann, S. Kroker, ”Highly reflective low-noise etalon-based meta-mirror,” Phys. Rev. D98, 082003 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Active correction of thermal lensing through external radiative thermal actuation,

    R. Lawrence, D. Ottaway, M. Zucker, and P. Fritschel, “Active correction of thermal lensing through external radiative thermal actuation,” Opt. Lett.29, 2635–2637 (2004)

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    Degallaix, ”Compensation of strong thermal lensing in advanced interferometric gravitational waves detec- tors,” Ph.D

    J. Degallaix, ”Compensation of strong thermal lensing in advanced interferometric gravitational waves detec- tors,” Ph.D. dissertation (University of Western Aus- tralia, 2006)

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    Hardwick, V

    T. Hardwick, V. J. Hamedan, C. Blair, A. C. Green, and D. Vander-Hyde, ”Demonstration of dynamic ther- mal compensation for parametric instability suppression in Advanced LIGO,” Class. Quantum Grav.37, 205021 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    G. M. Harry and the LIGO Scientific Collaboration, ”Ad- vanced LIGO: the next generation of gravitational wave detectors,” Class. Quantum Grav.27, 084006 (2010)

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    Le Jean, J

    M. Le Jean, J. Degallaix, D. Hofman, L. Pinard, D. For- est, M. Granata, C. Michel, J. Steinlechner, C. Amra, M. Lequime, and M. Zerrad, ”Comparison of arm cav- ity optical losses for the two wavelengths of the Einstein telescope gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quantum Grav.41, 225004 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Steinlechner, I

    J. Steinlechner, I. W Martin, R. Bassiri, A. Bell, M. M. Fejer, J. Hough, A. Markosyan, R. K. Route, and S. Rowan, ”Optical Absorption of Ion-Beam Sputtered aSi Coatings,” Phys. Rev. D93, 062005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    I. A. Birney, J. Steinlechner, Z. Tornasi, S. MacFoy, D. Vine, A. S. Bell, D. Gibson, J. Hough, S. Rowan, P. Sortais, S. Sproules, S. Tait, I. W. Martin, and S. Reid, ”Amorphous Silicon with Extremely Low Absorp- tion: Beating Thermal Noise in Gravitational Astron- omy,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 191101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Molina-Ruiz, A

    M. Molina-Ruiz, A. Markosyan, R. Bassiri, M. M. Fe- jer, M. Abernathy, T. H. Metcalf, X. Liu, G. Vajente, A. Ananyeva, F. Hellman, ”Hydrogen-Induced Ultralow Op- tical Absorption and Mechanical Loss in Amorphous Sil- icon for Gravitational-Wave Detectors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 256902 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Domash, M

    L. Domash, M. Wu, N. Nemchuk, and E. Ma, ”Tunable and Switchable Multiple-Cavity Thin Film Filters,” J. Lightwave Technol.22, 126-135 (2004)

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    L. H. Domash, E. Ma, M. Lourie, W. Sharfin, and M. Wagner, ”Broadly tunable thin film interference coatings: active thin films for telecom applications,” inOptical De- vices for Fiber Communication IV, M. J. F. Digonnet, ed., Proc. SPIE4989, 161-167 (2003)

    work page 2003

  30. [30]

    P. K. Tawalare, ”Optimizing photovoltaic conversion of solar energy,” AIP Advances11, 100701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Zhang, L

    C. Zhang, L. Chen, Z. Lin, J. Song, D. Wang, M. Li, O. Koksal, Z. Wang, G. Spektor, D. Carlson, H. J. Lezec, W. Zhu, S. Papp and A. Agrawal, ”Tantalum pentoxide: a new material platform for high-performance dielectric metasurface optics in the ultraviolet and visible region,” Light Sci. Appl.13, 23 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Granata, A

    M. Granata, A. Amato, L. Balzarini, M. Canepa, J. De- gallaix, D. Forest, V. Dolique, L. Mereni, C. Michel, L. Pinard, B. Sassolas, J. Teillon, G. Cagnoli, ”Amorphous optical coatings of present gravitational-wave interferom- eters,” Class. Quantum Grav.37, 095004 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Dickmann, C

    J. Dickmann, C. B. Rojas Hurtado, R. Nawrodt, S. Kro- ker, ”Influence of polarization and material on Brownian thermal noise of binary grating reflectors,” Phys. Lett. A 382, 2275-2281 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    C. Amra, M. Lequime, and M. Zerrad,Electromagnetic Optics of Thin-Film Coatings - Light Scattering, Giant Field Enhancements, and Planar Microcavities, Cam- bridge University Press (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Patoux, G

    A. Patoux, G. Agez, C. Girard, V. Paillard, P. R. Wiecha, A. Lecestre, F. Carcenac, G. Larrieu, and A. Arbouet, ”Challenges in nanofabrication for efficient optical meta- 7 surfaces,” Sci. Rep.11, 5620 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Dickmann, S

    J. Dickmann, S. Sauer, J. Meyer, M. Gaedtke, T. Siefke, U. Br¨ uckner, J. Plentz, and S. Kroker, ”Experimental realization of a 12,000-finesse laser cavity based on a low-noise microstructured mirror,” Commun Phys6, 16 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Y. Y. Jiang, A. D. Ludlow, N. D. Lemke, R. W. Fox, J. A. Sherma,, L.-S. Ma, and C. W. Oates, ”Making optical atomic clocks more stable with 10 −16 -level laser stabi- lization,” Nature Photon5, 158–161 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Wcislo, P.Morzynski, M

    P. Wcislo, P.Morzynski, M. Bober, A. Cygan, D. Lisak, R. Ciurylo, M. Zawada, ”Experimental constraint on dark matter detection with optical atomic clocks,” Nat. Astron.1, 0009 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    J. Agil, R. Battesti, C. Rizzo, ”Vacuum birefringence ex- periments: optical noise,” Eur. Phys. J. D76, 192 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Zavattini, F

    G. Zavattini, F. Della Valle, A. Ejlli, W.-T. Ni, U. Gastaldi, E. Milotti, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso, ”Intrinsic mir- ror noise in Fabry–Perot based polarimeters: the case for the measurement of vacuum magnetic birefringence,” Eur. Phys. J. C78, 585 (2018)

    work page 2018