Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 65 references

Search for Sterile Neutrinos with CUPID-0

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first search for sterile-neutrino emission in the double beta decay of 82Se; no signal was found, and the most stringent limit excludes sin²θ < 8×10⁻³ for a sterile neutrino mass of 0.7 MeV.

desk verdict First sterile-neutrino search in 82Se; solid analysis and strongest double-beta limits in the 0.5–1.5 MeV window, but the paper drops recent 2νββ shape corrections without quantifying their effect on the headline limit. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.17602 v1 pith:FMYC3L5K submitted 2026-03-18 nucl-ex hep-ex

O. Azzolini , J.W. Beeman , F. Bellini , M. Beretta , M. Biassoni , C. Brofferio , C. Bucci , S. Capelli
show 45 more authors
V. Caracciolo L. Cardani P. Carniti N. Casali E. Celi D. Chiesa M. Clemenza I. Colantoni O. Cremonesi A. Cruciani A. D'Addabbo I. Dafinei S. Di Domizio F. Ferroni L. Gironi A. Giuliani P. Gorla C. Gotti L. Gráf G. Keppel J. Kotila M. Martinez S. Nagorny M. Nastasi S. Nisi C. Nones D. Orlandi L. Pagnanini M. Pallavicini L. Pattavina M. Pavan G. Pessina L. Petrillo V. Pettinacci S. Pietrarota S. Pirro S. Pozzi E. Previtali A. Puiu A. Ressa C. Rusconi K. Schäffner C. Tomei M. Vignati A. S. Zolotarova
This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-exhep-ex
keywords sterileneutrinodoublebetadecay82SeCUPID-0active-sterilemixingspectraldistortionbackgroundmodelscintillatingbolometer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish whether a sterile neutrino with mass between 0.5 and 1.5 MeV is emitted alongside the two-neutrino double beta decay of 82Se, distorting the summed electron-energy spectrum. Using 9.95 kg·yr of Zn82Se exposure from the CUPID-0 detector, it finds no such distortion in any mass hypothesis. From the absence of signal it sets 90% credible upper limits on the active-sterile mixing probability sin²θ, the tightest being sin²θ < 8×10⁻³ for a sterile mass of 0.7 MeV. If correct, this excludes a previously untested slice of sterile-neutrino parameter space in a model-independent way, and it demonstrates that a low-threshold background model can turn a 0νββ experiment into a spectral-shape probe.

What carries the argument

The signal template is the one-sterile-neutrino double beta decay (Nνββ) spectrum, with endpoint reduced to Qββ − mN; for each mass hypothesis its simulated shape is fit as an additional background component. The extraction uses sin²θ = Gνν/(2GνN) · ΓνN/Γνν, where the phase-space factors G come from a Kotila-Iachello-style calculation modified for massive neutrinos. The backdrop is a four-spectra Bayesian background model (single-crystal β/γ, single-crystal α, two-crystal coincidences in individual and summed energies) rebuilt down to 200 keV; the 2νββ continuum is modeled with the Single-State Dominance approximation.

What would settle it

Refit the published 200 keV–5 MeV spectrum with (a) the 2νββ shape including the radiative and exchange corrections currently dropped, or (b) the 90Sr activity floating freely instead of tied to 137Cs. If the resulting 90% upper limit at mN = 0.7 MeV moves above 8×10⁻³, the reported bound is not stable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that no sterile-neutrino signal appears in the 82Se double beta spectrum, and consequently the mixing probability is bounded as sin²θ < 8×10⁻³ at mN = 0.7 MeV, with limits spanning 0.0088 to 0.176 across 0.5 to 1.5 MeV. These are the strongest double-beta-decay-based exclusions in this mass window, improving on previous searches in other isotopes. The result follows from a Bayesian fit in which a simulated Nνββ template is added to a background model that extends down to 200 keV, using phase-space factors for 82Se computed for the first time in this work.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim collapses if the modeled 82Se two-neutrino double-beta spectrum — taken in the Single-State Dominance approximation, without the radiative and exchange corrections the paper sets aside — is wrong by a few percent in the region where a sterile signal would appear, or if the assumed 90Sr/137Cs activity equality is inaccurate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Electron-flavor sterile neutrinos with mass near 0.7 MeV and sin²θ above 8×10⁻³ are excluded at 90% credibility, assuming the background model is correct.
  • Across 0.5–1.5 MeV, the reported limits are more restrictive than those from the two prior double-beta searches, so the full grid constitutes the current reference in this mass window.
  • The Nνββ phase-space factors for 82Se computed here can be reused by any future measurement of this isotope.
  • The proven ability to fit spectral shapes down to 200 keV opens CUPID-type detectors to searches for other exotic final states, not just sterile neutrinos.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the omitted radiative and exchange corrections to the 2νββ shape are not actually subdominant, the extracted limits could shift by roughly the size of the energy-scale systematics (up to tens of percent); a reanalysis including them would settle this.
  • The assumed equality of 90Sr and 137Cs activities, borrowed from an external analysis, could be tested directly by radiochemical assay of the ZnSe crystals; an independent value would reduce the degeneracy that weakens the fit.
  • The same background-model pipeline could be run on existing 100Mo or 76Ge data with Nνββ templates, providing cross-isotope consistency checks at masses where one isotope is more sensitive.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a search for electron-sterile neutrino emission in the two-neutrino double-beta decay of 82Se using CUPID-0 data (9.95 kg·yr Zn82Se exposure). The background model is extended to 200 keV and jointly fit to four spectral classes with 33 radioactive-source templates. For each of eleven sterile masses between 0.5 and 1.5 MeV, an additional Nνββ template is included and its normalization is converted to sin²θ through Eq. (4.1). No signal is found; the 90% C.I. limits in Table 2 are strongest for m_N around 0.7 MeV, with sin²θ < 8×10^-3 in the reference model, and the authors claim the most stringent double-beta-derived bound in the explored range.

Significance. If the result is valid, it is the first 82Se sterile-neutrino constraint and improves on CUPID-Mo and GERDA over 0.5–1.5 MeV. The analysis is largely well executed: the statistical framework in Appendix A is standard and coherent; the global pull distribution validates the background model (µ=0.11±0.06, σ=1.06±0.06); the mass grid is fixed in advance; and Table 2 systematically explores binning, threshold, energy-scale, and background-composition variations. The new Nνββ phase-space factors are tabulated. The main question is whether the assumed 2νββ spectral shape is accurate enough at the few-percent level.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3 / Table 2] The 2νββ template is generated in the Single-State Dominance approximation and the radiative/exchange corrections of Refs. [54,55] are dropped as 'expected to be subdominant' without a quantitative bound. This is load-bearing: the searched-for Nνββ signal is a small spectral distortion of the same 2νββ continuum, and the 0.7 MeV peak lies in the 200–1000 keV region where shape errors can be largest. None of the systematic configurations in Table 2 varies the 2νββ spectral shape; only binning, threshold, energy scale, and background composition are changed. The pull distribution in Fig. 2 does not test shape errors that mimic the signal because the data are fit with the assumed shape. Please add a systematic test using the corrected 2νββ shapes (or provide a bounded estimate of the induced shift in sin²θ).
  2. [Sec. 4 (last bullet) / Table 2] The 90Sr–90Y continuum is explicitly described as strongly degenerate with both 2νββ and Nνββ spectra. It is excluded from the reference model and included in only one systematic configuration, where its activity is forced to equal that of 137Cs following the CUORE ansatz [62]. If the actual 90Sr/137Cs ratio differs from unity, or if 137Cs is not a reliable tracer, the fit can absorb the 90Sr continuum into the Nνββ normalization and shift the limits. The reported ±(8–11)% variation tests only the equal-activity hypothesis. I ask for a sensitivity scan over the 90Sr/137Cs ratio or an independent constraint on the 90Sr activity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] Reference [62] is a duplicate of Reference [57]; this should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (4.1)] Please explicitly define Γνν and ΓνN and state that the nuclear matrix element is assumed to cancel in the ratio. The assumption is plausible but should be stated.
  3. [Table 2] The table shows the reference limits and the percent variations for each systematic, but not the combined model-averaged limit. Since the model averaging is central to the quoted 'with systematics' result, a row for the combined posterior would improve transparency.
  4. [Abstract] The phrase 'the most stringent bound' should be qualified as 'the most stringent bound from double-beta decay searches', since single-beta kink searches give stronger limits in some mass ranges, as acknowledged in Sec. 6.
  5. [Sec. 4] Minor wording/graphical issue: 'The first undergoes pure β-decay into Yttrium-90' should be '90Sr undergoes pure β-decay...'; also, the bottom panel of Fig. 1 could state explicitly that the deviation is computed for sin²θ=0.5.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sterile-neutrino limit is extracted from an independent signal template, a theoretical phase-space conversion, and a separately fitted background; no fitted constant is recycled into the prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The Nνββ signal is an independent Monte Carlo template whose shape follows the external formalism of Ref. [24], and the 82Se phase-space factors in Table 1 are computed from that formalism, not fitted to the data. The 2νββ continuum is modeled separately using the SSD approximation from Ref. [53] with its normalization fitted in the same likelihood; the sterile-amplitude fit is an additional free parameter. The parameter of interest is obtained by inserting the fitted Nνββ-to-2νββ rate ratio into the theoretical relation Eq. (4.1) with the computed phase-space ratio, so the upper limit is a function of the data and independent theoretical inputs, not a re-statement of any fitted constant. Shared authorship with Ref. [24] (L. Gráf) is a self-citation, but that cited result is a parameter-free published theory calculation that also anchors the CUPID-Mo and GERDA comparisons; it does not assume the CUPID-0 result. The explicitly acknowledged limitations — the omission of 2νββ radiative/exchange corrections (Sec. 3, Refs. [54,55]) and the 90Sr-90Y/137Cs activity equality borrowed from CUORE (Sec. 4) — are model-uncertainty risks that could bias the extracted limit if the 2νββ shape is incorrect, but they do not make the claimed limit equivalent to its inputs by construction. No circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities or parameters: the paper adds a theory-built Nνββ template on top of the collaboration's established background machinery. The fitted quantities are background activities and the signal normalization; the conversion to sin²θ uses phase-space factors computed from external theory. The main unverified inputs are the 2νββ SSD shape, the stated-but-unquantified subdominance of radiative/exchange corrections, and the MC template completeness.

free parameters (3)
  • 33 background source activities (scaling coefficients a_j) = not tabulated here (best-fit values in EPJC 79 (2019) 583)
    Fitted jointly to the four spectral classes via Eqs. A.1–A.3; they partition the continuum on which the sterile template competes.
  • Sterile (Nνββ) normalization coefficient a_N per mass hypothesis = posterior mean not quoted; 90% upper limits in Tab. 2
    Fitted as an extra template; converted to sin²θ via Eq. 4.1 using the ab initio G_νN of Tab. 1.
  • Analysis-configuration knobs: bin width (10/15/20 keV), threshold (200/300 keV), energy-scale shifts (+3/−5 keV), source = variants listed in Tab. 2 with ±percent deviations up to +102%
    Chosen by hand; treated as alternative models weighted by evidence (Eq. A.4–A.5); the −5 keV shift and 300 keV threshold dominate limit inflation at the mass-grid edges.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Sterile neutrinos exist and, if kinematically allowed, modify double beta decay as Γ_ββ = cos⁴θ Γ_νν + 2cos²θ sin²θ Γ_νN + sin⁴θ Γ_NN (Eq. 1.3)
    The search target; the rate formula and Nνββ formalism are taken from Ref. [24] (Bolton et al.), not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Nνββ spectral shape and phase-space factors factorize per Ref. [24] with Q_ββ replaced by Q_ββ − m_N; PSFs computed via the Kotila–Iachello method (Ref. [59]) with Ref. [24] modifications
    Sec. 4 and Tab. 1: these G_νN enter Eq. 4.1 directly, so an error in the formalism rescales every quoted limit.
  • domain assumption The 82Se 2νββ spectrum follows the Single-State Dominance approximation (Ref. [53]) and radiative/exchange corrections (Refs. [54,55]) are subdominant
    Sec. 3; the dominant continuum is fit as a template, and the sterile distortion is searched on top of it.
  • domain assumption GEANT4 (Arby toolkit) Monte Carlo templates reproduce the detector response in all four spectral classes (M1β/γ, M1α, M2, Σ2)
    Sec. 3: 33 background sources are simulated; template fidelity including efficiencies, thresholds, and coincidences is assumed without cross-validation in this paper.
  • standard math Bayesian likelihood (Poisson product, Eq. A.1), uniform/Gaussian priors, Metropolis–Hastings MCMC (BAT), and evidence-weighted model combination (Eq. A.4–A.5) with π(M_s)=1
    Appendix A; conventional statistical framework; the flat [0,1] prior on sin²θ is stated.
  • domain assumption The 56Co-based energy calibration bias (+3/−5 keV) is representative across the full exposure
    Sec. 4: the −5 keV shift is the largest systematic at low masses (+93% at 0.5 MeV), so the limits depend sensitively on calibration fidelity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Search for Sterile Neutrinos with CUPID-0." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FMYC3L5K

@misc{pith2026260317602,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Search for Sterile Neutrinos with CUPID-0},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FMYC3L5K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.17602}
}
abstract

Sterile neutrinos are well-motivated extensions of the Standard Model, introduced to address fundamental questions such as the origin of neutrino masses and the nature of dark matter. Exploiting the precise data reconstruction achieved by the CUPID-0 experiment, we searched for spectral distortions in the double $\beta$-decay of $^{82}$Se compatible with the emission of a sterile neutrino. The analysis relies on the construction of a detailed background model down to 200 keV, enabling an accurate characterization of the main sources of contamination. Using a Zn$^{82}$Se exposure of 9.95 kg$\cdot$yr, we explored sterile neutrino mass hypotheses between 0.5 MeV and 1.5 MeV. No evidence for a signal was observed in any scenario; therefore, we derived 90% C.I. upper limits on the active-sterile mixing probability $\sin^2\theta$, obtaining the most stringent bound, $\sin^2\theta<8\times 10^{-3}$, for a sterile neutrino mass of 0.7 MeV.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references

  1. [62]

    Adams et al.,Half-Life and Precision Shape Measurement of the2νββDecay of 130Te, Phys

    D.Q. Adams et al.,Half-Life and Precision Shape Measurement of the2νββDecay of 130Te, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 082501

    2025

  2. [1]

    Ahmad et al.,Direct Evidence for Neutrino Flavor Transformation from Neutral-Current Interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,Phys

    Q.R. Ahmad et al.,Direct Evidence for Neutrino Flavor Transformation from Neutral-Current Interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,Phys. Rev. Lett.89(2002) 011301

    2002

  3. [2]

    Cleveland et al.,Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the Homestake chlorine detector,Astrophys

    B.T. Cleveland et al.,Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the Homestake chlorine detector,Astrophys. J.496(1998) 505

    1998

  4. [3]

    Agostini et al.,Improved measurement of 8Bsolar neutrinos with1.5 kt·yof Borexino exposure,Phys

    M. Agostini et al.,Improved measurement of 8Bsolar neutrinos with1.5 kt·yof Borexino exposure,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 062001

    2020

  5. [4]

    F.P. An, J.Z. Bai and Balantekin,Observation of Electron-Antineutrino Disappearance at Daya Bay,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 171803

    2012

  6. [5]

    Abe et al.,Indication of Reactor νe Disappearance in the Double Chooz Experiment,Phys

    Y. Abe et al.,Indication of Reactor νe Disappearance in the Double Chooz Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 131801

    2012

  7. [6]

    Aartsen et al.,Measurement of Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at 6–56 GeV with IceCube DeepCore,Phys

    M. Aartsen et al.,Measurement of Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at 6–56 GeV with IceCube DeepCore,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 071801

    2018

  8. [7]

    S. Abe, T. Ebihara and Enomoto,Precision Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 221803

    2008

Show all 65 references
  1. [8]

    Fukuda, T

    Y. Fukuda, T. Hayakawa and Ichihara,Evidence for Oscillation of Atmospheric Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 1562–1567

    1998

  2. [9]

    Ahn et al.,Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrinos Disappearance in the RENO Experiment,Phys

    J.K. Ahn et al.,Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrinos Disappearance in the RENO Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 191802

    2012

  3. [10]

    Aguilar et al.,Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the observation of νe appearance in a νµ beam,Phys

    A. Aguilar et al.,Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the observation of νe appearance in a νµ beam,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 112007

    2001

  4. [11]

    Aguilar-Arevalo et al.,Unexplained Excess of Electronlike Events from a 1 GeV Neutrino Beam,Phys

    A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al.,Unexplained Excess of Electronlike Events from a 1 GeV Neutrino Beam,Phys. Rev. Lett.102(2009) 101802

    2009

  5. [12]

    Elliott, V

    S. Elliott, V. Gavrin and W. Haxton,The gallium anomaly,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.134(2024) 104082

    2024

  6. [13]

    Mention et al.,Reactor antineutrino anomaly,Phys

    G. Mention et al.,Reactor antineutrino anomaly,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 073006

    2011

  7. [14]

    Dasgupta and J

    B. Dasgupta and J. Kopp,Sterile neutrinos,Phys. Rept.928(2021) 1–63

    2021

  8. [15]

    Batra et al.,Phenomenology of the simplest linear seesaw mechanism,JHEP2023(2023) 221

    A. Batra et al.,Phenomenology of the simplest linear seesaw mechanism,JHEP2023(2023) 221

    2023

  9. [16]

    Abazajian,Sterile neutrinos in cosmology,Phys

    K.N. Abazajian,Sterile neutrinos in cosmology,Phys. Rept.711–712(2017) 1–28

    2017

  10. [17]

    Boyarsky et al.,Sterile neutrino Dark Matter,Prog

    A. Boyarsky et al.,Sterile neutrino Dark Matter,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.104(2019) 1–45

    2019

  11. [18]

    Wurm,Experimental searches on sterile neutrinos,Proceedings of XIIth International Conference on Heavy Quarks&Leptons 2014 — PoS(HQL2014)223(2015) 20

    M. Wurm,Experimental searches on sterile neutrinos,Proceedings of XIIth International Conference on Heavy Quarks&Leptons 2014 — PoS(HQL2014)223(2015) 20

    2014

  12. [19]

    Acero et al.,White paper on light sterile neutrino searches and related phenomenology,J

    M.A. Acero et al.,White paper on light sterile neutrino searches and related phenomenology,J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.51(2024) 120501

    2024

  13. [20]

    Goeppert-Mayer,Double Beta-Disintegration,Phys

    M. Goeppert-Mayer,Double Beta-Disintegration,Phys. Rev.48(1935) 512

    1935

  14. [21]

    Furry,On Transition Probabilities in Double Beta-Disintegration,Phys

    W.H. Furry,On Transition Probabilities in Double Beta-Disintegration,Phys. Rev.56(1939) 1184

    1939

  15. [22]

    Primakoff and S.P

    H. Primakoff and S.P. Rosen,Double beta decay,Rep. Prog. Phys.22(1959) 121

    1959

  16. [23]

    M. Doi, T. Kotani and E. Takasugi,Double beta decay and majorana neutrino,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.83(1985) 1

    1985

  17. [24]

    Bolton, F.F

    P.D. Bolton, F.F. Deppisch, L. Gr´ af and F. ˇSimkovic,Two-neutrino double beta decay with sterile neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 055019. – 12 –

    2021

  18. [25]

    Bossio and M

    E. Bossio and M. Agostini,Probing beyond the standard model physics with double-beta decays, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys51(2024) 023001

    2024

  19. [26]

    K. Blum, Y. Nir and M. Shavit,Neutrinoless double-beta decay with massive scalar emission, Phys. Lett. B785(2018) 354–361

    2018

  20. [27]

    Brune and H

    T. Brune and H. P¨ as,Massive Majorons and constraints on the Majoron-neutrino coupling, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 096005

    2019

  21. [28]

    Deppisch, L

    F.F. Deppisch, L. Graf and F. ˇSimkovic,Searching for New Physics in Two-Neutrino Double Beta Decay,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 171801

    2020

  22. [29]

    Deppisch, L

    F.F. Deppisch, L. Graf, W. Rodejohann and X.-J. Xu,Neutrino self-interactions and double beta decay,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 051701

    2020

  23. [30]

    Scalarful double beta decay

    J. de Vries, L. Gr´ af, V. Plakkot and D. Star´ y, “Scalarful double beta decay.” https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19173, 2025

    2025

  24. [31]

    et al.,Searching for beyond the Standard Model physics using the improved description of 100Mo2νββdecay spectral shape with CUPID-Mo,Eur

    Augier, C. et al.,Searching for beyond the Standard Model physics using the improved description of 100Mo2νββdecay spectral shape with CUPID-Mo,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 925

    2024

  25. [32]

    Agostini et al.,Search for exotic physics in double-βdecays with GERDA Phase-II,JCAP 2022(2022) 012

    M. Agostini et al.,Search for exotic physics in double-βdecays with GERDA Phase-II,JCAP 2022(2022) 012

    2022

  26. [33]

    P. S., B. J.W. and C. S.,Scintillating double-beta-decay bolometers,Phys. Atom. Nuclei69 (2006) 2109–2116

    2006

  27. [34]

    Beeman et al.,Current Status and Future Perspectives of the LUCIFER Experiment,Adv

    J.W. Beeman et al.,Current Status and Future Perspectives of the LUCIFER Experiment,Adv. High Energy Phys.2013(2013) 237973

    2013

  28. [35]

    Dafinei et al.,Production of 82Se enriched Zinc Selenide (ZnSe) crystals for the study of neutrinoless double beta decay,J

    I. Dafinei et al.,Production of 82Se enriched Zinc Selenide (ZnSe) crystals for the study of neutrinoless double beta decay,J. Cryst. Growth475(2017) 158

    2017

  29. [36]

    Beeman et al.,Performances of a large mass ZnSe bolometer to search for rare events, JINST8(2013) P05021

    J.W. Beeman et al.,Performances of a large mass ZnSe bolometer to search for rare events, JINST8(2013) P05021

    2013

  30. [37]

    Beeman et al.,Characterization of bolometric light detectors for rare event searches, JINST8(2013) P07021

    J.W. Beeman et al.,Characterization of bolometric light detectors for rare event searches, JINST8(2013) P07021

    2013

  31. [38]

    Arnaboldi et al.,Characterization of ZnSe scintillating bolometers for Double Beta Decay, Astropart

    C. Arnaboldi et al.,Characterization of ZnSe scintillating bolometers for Double Beta Decay, Astropart. Phys.34(2011) 344–353

    2011

  32. [39]

    Azzolini et al.,Background model of the CUPID-0 experiment,Eur

    O. Azzolini et al.,Background model of the CUPID-0 experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 583

    2019

  33. [40]

    Augier et al.,The background model of the CUPID-Mo0νββexperiment,Eur

    C. Augier et al.,The background model of the CUPID-Mo0νββexperiment,Eur. Phys. J. C 83(2023) 675

    2023

  34. [41]

    Adams et al.,Data-driven background model for the CUORE experiment,Phys

    D. Adams et al.,Data-driven background model for the CUORE experiment,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 052003

    2024

  35. [42]

    Lincoln, J.D

    D.L. Lincoln, J.D. Holt, G. Bollen and M. Brodeur,First Direct Double-βDecay Q-Value Measurement of 82Se in Support of Understanding the Nature of the Neutrino,Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(2013) 012501

    2013

  36. [43]

    Azzolini et al.,CUPID-0: the first array of enriched scintillating bolometers for0νββdecay investigations,Eur

    O. Azzolini et al.,CUPID-0: the first array of enriched scintillating bolometers for0νββdecay investigations,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 428

    2018

  37. [44]

    Balabanov et al.,High-efficiency recovery of 82se from enriched zn82se scintillating bolometer crystals,JINST18(2023) P04035

    S. Balabanov et al.,High-efficiency recovery of 82se from enriched zn82se scintillating bolometer crystals,JINST18(2023) P04035

    2023

  38. [45]

    Haller, N.P

    E.E. Haller, N.P. Palaio, W.L. Hansen and E. Kreysa,Neutron Transmutation Doping of Semiconductor Materials, Springer (1984). – 13 –

    1984

  39. [46]

    Azzolini et al.,Final Result on the Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of 82Sewith CUPID-0, Phys

    O. Azzolini et al.,Final Result on the Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of 82Sewith CUPID-0, Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022)

    2022

  40. [47]

    Azzolini et al.,Measurement of the2νββDecay Half-Life of 82Sewith the Global CUPID-0 Background Model,Phys

    O. Azzolini et al.,Measurement of the2νββDecay Half-Life of 82Sewith the Global CUPID-0 Background Model,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 222501

    2023

  41. [48]

    Azzolini et al.,Search for Majoron-like particles with CUPID-0,Phys

    O. Azzolini et al.,Search for Majoron-like particles with CUPID-0,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 032006

    2023

  42. [49]

    Ressa et al.,Search for new physics in doubleβdecay of 82Se with the CUPID-0 background model,AIP Conf

    A. Ressa et al.,Search for new physics in doubleβdecay of 82Se with the CUPID-0 background model,AIP Conf. Proc.3143(2025) 020017

    2025

  43. [50]

    Azzolini et al.,Analysis of cryogenic calorimeters with light and heat read-out for double beta decay searches,Eur

    O. Azzolini et al.,Analysis of cryogenic calorimeters with light and heat read-out for double beta decay searches,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018)

    2018

  44. [51]

    Azzolini et al.,First Result on the Neutrinoless Double-βDecay of 82Sewith CUPID-0, Phys

    O. Azzolini et al.,First Result on the Neutrinoless Double-βDecay of 82Sewith CUPID-0, Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 232502. [52]GEANT4collaboration,GEANT4 - A Simulation Toolkit,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250

    2018

  45. [53]

    Azzolini et al.,Evidence of Single State Dominance in the Two-Neutrino Double-βDecay of 82Sewith CUPID-0,Phys

    O. Azzolini et al.,Evidence of Single State Dominance in the Two-Neutrino Double-βDecay of 82Sewith CUPID-0,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 262501

    2019

  46. [54]

    Nit ¸escu and F.ˇSimkovic,Radiative and exchange corrections for two-neutrino double-β decay,Phys

    O. Nit ¸escu and F.ˇSimkovic,Radiative and exchange corrections for two-neutrino double-β decay,Phys. Rev. C111(2025) 035501

    2025

  47. [55]

    el Morabit et al., 2νββSpectrum in Chiral Effective Field Theory,JHEP2025(2025) 82

    S. el Morabit et al., 2νββSpectrum in Chiral Effective Field Theory,JHEP2025(2025) 82

    2025

  48. [56]

    Alduino et al.,Measurement of the two-neutrino double-beta decay half-life of 130Te with the CUORE-0 experiment,Eur

    C. Alduino et al.,Measurement of the two-neutrino double-beta decay half-life of 130Te with the CUORE-0 experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 13

    2017

  49. [58]

    et al.,The background model of the CUPID-Mo 0νββexperiment,Eur

    Augier, C. et al.,The background model of the CUPID-Mo 0νββexperiment,Eur. Phys. J. C 83(2023) 675

    2023

  50. [59]

    Kotila and F

    J. Kotila and F. Iachello,Phase-space factors for double-βdecay,Phys. Rev. C85(2012) 034316

    2012

  51. [60]

    Azzolini et al.,Final Result of CUPID-0 Phase-I in the Search for the 82SeNeutrinoless Double-βDecay,Phys

    O. Azzolini et al.,Final Result of CUPID-0 Phase-I in the Search for the 82SeNeutrinoless Double-βDecay,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 032501

    2019

  52. [61]

    Kinase et al.,Temporal variations of 90Sr and 137Cs in atmospheric depositions after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident with long-term observations,Sci

    T. Kinase et al.,Temporal variations of 90Sr and 137Cs in atmospheric depositions after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident with long-term observations,Sci. Rep.10 (2020) 21627

    2020

  53. [63]

    Armengaud et al.,The CUPID-Mo experiment for neutrinoless double-beta decay: performance and prospects,Eur

    E. Armengaud et al.,The CUPID-Mo experiment for neutrinoless double-beta decay: performance and prospects,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 44

    2020

  54. [64]

    Ackermann et al.,The Gerda experiment for the search of 0νββdecay in 76Ge,Eur

    K.-H. Ackermann et al.,The Gerda experiment for the search of 0νββdecay in 76Ge,Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2330

    2013

  55. [65]

    Deutsch, M

    J. Deutsch, M. Lebrun and R. Prieels,Searches for admixture of massive neutrinos into the electron flavor,Nucl. Phys. A518(1990) 149

    1990

  56. [66]

    Bryman and R

    D.A. Bryman and R. Shrock,Improved constraints on sterile neutrinos in the MeV to GeV mass range,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 053006

    2019

  57. [67]

    Bellini et al.,New limits on heavy sterile neutrino mixing in 8B decay obtained with the Borexino detector,Phys

    G. Bellini et al.,New limits on heavy sterile neutrino mixing in 8B decay obtained with the Borexino detector,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 072010. – 14 –

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.