pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.19592 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Non-collinear ferromagnetism in the Kondo lattice Ce₅CoGe₂

Jinyu Wu , Jiawen Zhang , Toni Shiroka , Shams Sohel Islam , Mingyi Wang , Yongjun Zhang , Devashibhai T. Adroja , Yu Liu
show 2 more authors
Huiqiu Yuan Michael Smidman
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 08:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords Kondo latticenoncollinear ferromagnetismneutron diffractioncrystalline electric fieldDzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactionCe5CoGe2muon spin relaxation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ce₅CoGe₂ orders in a noncollinear ferromagnetic structure with distinct moments on its four cerium sites.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the ambient-pressure magnetic state of the dense Kondo lattice Ce₅CoGe₂, which becomes superconducting once magnetism is suppressed by pressure. Neutron diffraction combined with magnetization and heat-capacity data establishes a ferromagnetic order that is noncollinear, with the four inequivalent cerium sites carrying magnetic moments of different sizes and directions. Point-charge calculations of the crystalline-electric-field states reproduce the site-dependent moments and their orientations, while Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction analysis shows nonzero vectors on most Ce–Ce bonds. The authors conclude that competition among intersite exchange, single-ion anisotropy, the Kondo effect, and the DM interaction stabilizes this unusual ferromagnetic arrangement.

Core claim

Neutron diffraction reveals a noncollinear ferromagnetic structure in Ce₅CoGe₂, where the four inequivalent Ce sites exhibit different magnetic moments. Point-charge model calculations of the crystalline-electric field ground states corroborate different moments between the sites and suggest sizeable components along different directions, consistent with the non-collinear structure. Analysis of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction for the bonds connecting Ce atoms demonstrates that most of these bonds exhibit a nonzero DM vector, suggesting that competition between intersite magnetic exchange interactions, CEF driven single-ion anisotropy, the Kondo effect and the DM interaction may drive a

What carries the argument

Noncollinear ferromagnetic order on four inequivalent Ce sites, established by neutron diffraction and supported by crystalline-electric-field calculations and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction analysis.

If this is right

  • Pressure suppression of this noncollinear order is expected to produce the observed superconductivity.
  • Site-dependent moment sizes imply that Kondo screening strength varies across the four cerium environments.
  • The DM interaction must be included in any microscopic model of the magnetic phase diagram.
  • Similar noncollinear order may appear in other Ce-based Kondo lattices that contain multiple crystallographically distinct rare-earth sites.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The noncollinear order could imprint on the superconducting gap structure once magnetism is suppressed.
  • Local-environment differences among Ce sites offer a route to engineer complex magnetism in multi-rare-earth compounds.
  • Mapping how the moment directions evolve under pressure would test whether the DM component persists into the superconducting regime.

Load-bearing premise

The point-charge model calculations accurately capture the crystalline-electric field ground states and moment directions without needing more advanced treatments that account for Kondo hybridization.

What would settle it

Higher-resolution neutron diffraction or single-crystal measurements that find either collinear moments or identical moment magnitudes on all four Ce sites would falsify the noncollinear structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.19592 by Devashibhai T. Adroja, Huiqiu Yuan, Jiawen Zhang, Jinyu Wu, Michael Smidman, Mingyi Wang, Shams Sohel Islam, Toni Shiroka, Yongjun Zhang, Yu Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) The specific heat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Low-temperature neutron diffraction patterns of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Neutron diffraction patterns in the paramagnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Refined crystal (left) and magnetic (right) struc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a)-(e) Results of Rietveld refinements to the magnetic contribution of the diffraction data considering magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The dense Kondo lattice Ce$_5$CoGe$_2$ exhibits superconductivity once the magnetic ordering is suppressed by pressure. Here the ambient pressure magnetic state is investigated via magnetization, heat capacity, powder neutron diffraction, and muon spin relaxation ($\mu$SR) measurements. Neutron diffraction results reveal a noncollinear ferromagnetic structure, where the four inequivalent Ce sites exhibit different magnetic moments. Point-charge model calculations of the crystalline-electric field (CEF) ground states corroborate different moments between the sites, and suggest sizeable components of the moments along different directions, consistent with the non-collinear structure. Analysis of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction for the bonds connecting Ce atoms demonstrates that most of these bonds exhibit a nonzero DM vector, suggesting that competition between intersite magnetic exchange interactions, CEF driven single-ion anisotropy, the Kondo effect and the DM interaction may drive the non-collinear ferromagnetism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the ambient-pressure magnetic state of the dense Kondo lattice Ce₅CoGe₂, which becomes superconducting under pressure. Using magnetization, heat capacity, powder neutron diffraction, and μSR measurements, the authors conclude that the system orders in a noncollinear ferromagnetic structure in which the four inequivalent Ce sites carry distinct magnetic moments. Point-charge CEF calculations are presented to support site-dependent moments and directional components, while DM-interaction analysis on Ce–Ce bonds is used to argue that competition among exchange, CEF anisotropy, Kondo screening, and DM vectors stabilizes the noncollinear order.

Significance. If the noncollinear structure with site-specific moments is robustly established, the work adds a concrete example of how CEF-driven anisotropy and DM interactions can produce complex ferromagnetic order in a Kondo lattice, providing a reference point for understanding the pressure-induced suppression of magnetism that leads to superconductivity. The multi-technique experimental approach and explicit DM-vector calculations are positive features.

major comments (2)
  1. [Neutron diffraction analysis] Neutron diffraction section: Powder data are used to assign a noncollinear ferromagnetic structure with four distinct Ce moments. No R-factor or χ² comparisons are reported between this model and constrained alternatives (e.g., collinear order or equal-moment configurations), leaving open the possibility that other models fit the limited Bragg-peak information equally well.
  2. [CEF calculations] CEF calculations section: The point-charge model is invoked to corroborate different moments and directional components, yet the manuscript does not quantify its accuracy against more advanced treatments that include Kondo hybridization or full multiplet effects; this approximation is load-bearing for the claim that CEF alone explains the observed moment differences.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions for the neutron diffraction patterns should explicitly state the magnetic propagation vector and the refined moment values with uncertainties.
  2. [μSR analysis] The μSR section would benefit from a brief statement on how the relaxation rates distinguish ferromagnetic from antiferromagnetic or disordered states.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve the rigor of the analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Neutron diffraction section: Powder data are used to assign a noncollinear ferromagnetic structure with four distinct Ce moments. No R-factor or χ² comparisons are reported between this model and constrained alternatives (e.g., collinear order or equal-moment configurations), leaving open the possibility that other models fit the limited Bragg-peak information equally well.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative fit statistics are necessary to substantiate the choice of model. In the revised manuscript we have added R_wp and χ² values for the noncollinear ferromagnetic structure and direct comparisons to collinear and equal-moment alternatives. The noncollinear model yields a markedly lower χ²; these results are now reported in the Neutron diffraction section together with a new supplementary table. revision: yes

  2. Referee: CEF calculations section: The point-charge model is invoked to corroborate different moments and directional components, yet the manuscript does not quantify its accuracy against more advanced treatments that include Kondo hybridization or full multiplet effects; this approximation is load-bearing for the claim that CEF alone explains the observed moment differences.

    Authors: The point-charge model is indeed an approximation whose limitations we have now made explicit in the revised text. We acknowledge that it omits Kondo hybridization and full multiplet effects and cannot claim it alone accounts for the moment differences. We have added a discussion clarifying that the calculations provide qualitative support for site-dependent anisotropy consistent with the neutron results, while the overall noncollinear order arises from the interplay of CEF, exchange, Kondo screening and DM interactions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claim rests on direct neutron diffraction data

full rationale

The paper's primary result—a noncollinear ferromagnetic structure with four inequivalent Ce sites having distinct moments—is obtained from powder neutron diffraction measurements. Point-charge CEF calculations are applied afterward solely for consistency checks and interpretation, without feeding back into the structure determination or being presented as a derivation. No equations reduce the observed magnetic structure to fitted parameters by construction, no self-citations carry the load-bearing uniqueness argument, and no ansatz or renaming is used to generate the central claim. The derivation chain remains independent of the interpretive calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on standard assumptions in neutron diffraction analysis and CEF modeling, which are common in the field but introduce some uncertainty without full details.

free parameters (1)
  • CEF parameters
    Point-charge model likely involves fitted or calculated parameters for crystal field levels to match observed moments.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Validity of point-charge approximation for CEF in this compound
    Used to corroborate the different moments between sites.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5499 in / 1318 out tokens · 59285 ms · 2026-05-15T08:02:30.939995+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    which prioritizes the z axis being along a rotation axis. In this case, the CEF Hamiltonian for Ce1, Ce2 and Ce3 has the form: H 4c CEF =B0 2 O0 2 + B1 2 O1 2 + B2 2 O2 2 + B0 4 O0 4 +B1 4 O1 4 + B2 4 O2 4 + B3 4 O3 4 + B4 4 O4 4 (5) where Bm n are Stevens parameters and Om n are the Stevens operator equivalents [61]. From diagonalizing the CEF Hamiltonia...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Gegenwart, Q

    P. Gegenwart, Q. Si, and F. Steglich, Quantum criticality in heavy-fermion metals, Nature Physics 4, 186 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Si and F

    Q. Si and F. Steglich, Heavy fermions and quantum phase transitions, Science 329, 1161 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Z. F. Weng, M. Smidman, L. Jiao, X. Lu, and H. Q. Yuan, Multiple quantum phase transitions and supercon- ductivity in Ce-based heavy fermions, Rep. Prog. Phys 79, 094503 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    B. Shen, Y. Zhang, Y. Komijani, M. Nicklas, R. Borth, A. Wang, Y. Chen, Z. Nie, R. Li, X. Lu, H. Lee, M. Smid- man, F. Steglich, P. Coleman, and H. Yuan, Strange- metal behaviour in a pure ferromagnetic Kondo lattice, Nature 579, 51 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    J. Zhan, Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, Y. Liu, Z. Nie, Y. Chen, L. Jiao, Y. Komijani, M. Smidman, F. Steglich, P. Cole- man, and H. Yuan, Critical fluctuations and conserved dynamics in a strange ferromagnetic metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 266504 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Brando, D

    M. Brando, D. Belitz, F. M. Grosche, and T. R. Kirkpatrick, Metallic quantum ferromagnets, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 025006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    D. Aoki, F. Hardy, A. Miyake, V. Taufour, T. D. Mat- suda, and J. Flouquet, Properties of ferromagnetic super- conductors, Comptes Rendus. Physique 12, 573 (2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Kotegawa, T

    H. Kotegawa, T. Toyama, S. Kitagawa, H. Tou, R. Yamauchi, E. Matsuoka, and H. Sugawara, Pres- sure–Temperature–Magnetic Field Phase Diagram of Ferromagnetic Kondo Lattice CeRuPO, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 82, 123711 (2013)

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Friedemann, W

    S. Friedemann, W. J. Duncan, M. Hirschberger, T. W. Bauer, R. K¨ uchler, A. Neubauer, M. Brando, C. Pflei- derer, and F. M. Grosche, Quantum tricritical points in NbFe2, Nature Physics 14, 62 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    V. A. Sidorov, E. D. Bauer, N. A. Frederick, J. R. Jef- fries, S. Nakatsuji, N. O. Moreno, J. D. Thompson, M. B. Maple, and Z. Fisk, Magnetic phase diagram of the fer- romagnetic Kondo-lattice compound CeAgSb 2 up to 80 kbar, Phys. Rev. B 67, 224419 (2003)

    work page 2003

  12. [12]

    Westerkamp, M

    T. Westerkamp, M. Deppe, R. K¨ uchler, M. Brando, C. Geibel, P. Gegenwart, A. P. Pikul, and F. Steglich, Kondo-cluster-glass state near a ferromagnetic quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 206404 (2009)

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    A. P. Pikul, The influence of magnetic sublattice dilution on magnetic order in CeNiGe 3 and UNiSi 2, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 24, 276003 (2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Kawasaki, D

    I. Kawasaki, D. Nishikawa, H. Hidaka, T. Yanagisawa, K. Tenya, M. Yokoyama, and H. Amitsuka, Magnetic properties around quantum critical point of CePt1−xRhx, Physica B: Condensed Matter 404, 2908 (2009)

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    T. R. Kirkpatrick and D. Belitz, Ferromagnetic quantum critical point in noncentrosymmetric systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 147201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Miserev, D

    D. Miserev, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Instability of the ferromagnetic quantum critical point and symme- try of the ferromagnetic ground state in two-dimensional and three-dimensional electron gases with arbitrary spin- orbit splitting, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134417 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Y. H. Pei, Y. J. Zhang, Z. X. Wei, Y. X. Chen, K. Hu, Y.- f. Yang, H. Q. Yuan, and J. Qi, Unveiling the hybridiza- tion process in a quantum critical ferromagnet by ul- trafast optical spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 103, L180409 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Coleman, Y

    P. Coleman, Y. Komijani, and E. J. K¨ onig, Triplet res- onating valence bond state and superconductivity in hund’s metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 077001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Wang and Y.-F

    J. Wang and Y.-F. Yang, A unified theory of ferromag- netic quantum phase transitions in heavy fermion met- als, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 65, 257211 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Y. Wu, Y. Zhang, F. Du, B. Shen, H. Zheng, Y. Fang, M. Smidman, C. Cao, F. Steglich, H. Yuan, J. D. Den- linger, and Y. Liu, Anisotropic c − f hybridization in the ferromagnetic quantum critical metal CeRh 6Ge4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 216406 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    A. Wang, F. Du, Y. Zhang, D. Graf, B. Shen, Y. Chen, Y. Liu, M. Smidman, C. Cao, F. Steglich, and H. Yuan, Localized 4f-electrons in the quantum critical heavy fermion ferromagnet CeRh 6Ge4, Science Bulletin 66, 1389 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    J. W. Shu, D. T. Adroja, A. D. Hillier, Y. J. Zhang, Y. X. Chen, B. Shen, F. Orlandi, H. C. Walker, Y. Liu, C. Cao, F. Steglich, H. Q. Yuan, and M. Smidman, Mag- netic order and crystalline electric field excitations of the quantum critical heavy-fermion ferromagnet CeRh 6Ge4, Phys. Rev. B 104, L140411 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    S. M. Thomas, S. Seo, T. Asaba, F. Ronning, P. F. S. Rosa, E. D. Bauer, and J. D. Thompson, Probing quan- tum criticality in ferromagnetic CeRh6Ge4, Phys. Rev. B 109, L121105 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Yamamoto, S

    R. Yamamoto, S. Park, Z. W. Riedel, P. Sherpa, J. D. Thompson, F. Ronning, E. D. Bauer, A. P. Dioguardi, and M. Hirata, Evidence for easy-plane XY ferromag- netism in heavy-fermion quantum-critical CeRh 6Ge4, Phys. Rev. B 112, 155152 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Itokazu, A

    S. Itokazu, A. Kirikoshi, H. O. Jeschke, and J. Otsuki, From localized 4f electrons to anisotropic exchange in- teractions in ferromagnetic CeRh 6Ge4, Communications Materials 6, 269 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Belitz, T

    D. Belitz, T. R. Kirkpatrick, and T. Vojta, First order transitions and multicritical points in weak itinerant fer- romagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4707 (1999)

    work page 1999

  27. [27]

    J.-C. Xu, H. Su, R. Kumar, S.-S. Luo, Z.-Y. Nie, A. Wang, F. Du, R. Li, M. Smidman, and H.-Q. Yuan, Ce-site dilution in the ferromagnetic kondo lattice CeRh6Ge4, Chinese Physics Letters 38, 087101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Y. J. Zhang, Z. Y. Nie, R. Li, Y. C. Li, D. L. Yang, B. Shen, Y. Chen, F. Du, S. S. Luo, H. Su, R. Shi, S. Y. Wang, M. Nicklas, F. Steglich, M. Smidman, and H. Q. Yuan, Suppression of ferromagnetism and influence of disorder in silicon-substituted CeRh 6Ge4, Phys. Rev. B 106, 054409 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    A. V. Chubukov, C. P´ epin, and J. Rech, Instability of the quantum-critical point of itinerant ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 147003 (2004)

    work page 2004

  30. [30]

    G. J. Conduit, A. G. Green, and B. D. Simons, Inho- mogeneous phase formation on the border of itinerant ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 207201 (2009)

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    Karahasanovic, F

    U. Karahasanovic, F. Kr¨ uger, and A. G. Green, Quan- tum order-by-disorder driven phase reconstruction in the vicinity of ferromagnetic quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. B 85, 165111 (2012). 10

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Jobiliong, J

    E. Jobiliong, J. S. Brooks, E. S. Choi, H. Lee, and Z. Fisk, Magnetization and electrical-transport investi- gation of the dense kondo system CeAgSb 2, Phys. Rev. B 72, 104428 (2005)

    work page 2005

  33. [33]

    Y. Muro, N. Takeda, and M. Ishikawa, Magnetic and transport properties of dense kondo systems, CeTSb 2 (T=Ni, Cu, Pd and Ag), Journal of Alloys and Com- pounds 257, 23 (1997)

    work page 1997

  34. [34]

    Andr´ e, F

    G. Andr´ e, F. Bour´ ee, M. Kolenda, B. Le´ sniewska, A. Ole´ s, and A. Szytu la, Magnetic structures of RAgSb2 compounds, Physica B: Condensed Matter 292, 176 (2000)

    work page 2000

  35. [35]

    Araki, N

    S. Araki, N. Metoki, A. Galatanu, E. Yamamoto, A. Thamizhavel, and Y. ¯Onuki, Crystal structure, mag- netic ordering, and magnetic excitation in the 4 f- localized ferromagnet CeAgSb2, Phys. Rev. B 68, 024408 (2003)

    work page 2003

  36. [36]

    S. E. Nikitin, A. Podlesnyak, J. Xu, D. Voneshen, M. D. Le, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, and D. A. Sokolov, Mag- netic field induced softening of spin waves and hard-axis order in the Kondo-lattice ferromagnet CeAgSb 2, Phys. Rev. B 104, 115169 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Taufour, U

    V. Taufour, U. S. Kaluarachchi, R. Khasanov, M. C. Nguyen, Z. Guguchia, P. K. Biswas, P. Bonf` a, R. De Renzi, X. Lin, S. K. Kim, E. D. Mun, H. Kim, Y. Furukawa, C.-Z. Wang, K.-M. Ho, S. L. Bud’ko, and P. C. Canfield, Ferromagnetic quantum critical point avoided by the appearance of another magnetic phase in LaCrGe3 under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 0...

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    U. S. Kaluarachchi, S. L. Budko, P. C. Canfield, and V. Taufour, Tricritical wings and modulated magnetic phases in LaCrGe 3 under pressure, Nature Communica- tions 8, 546 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    E. Gati, J. M. Wilde, R. Khasanov, L. Xiang, S. Dis- sanayake, R. Gupta, M. Matsuda, F. Ye, B. Haberl, U. Kaluarachchi, R. J. McQueeney, A. Kreyssig, S. L. Bud’ko, and P. C. Canfield, Formation of short-range magnetic order and avoided ferromagnetic quantum criti- cality in pressurized LaCrGe3, Phys. Rev. B 103, 075111 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Cadogan, P

    J. Cadogan, P. Lemoine, B. R. Slater, A. Mar, and M. Avdeev, Neutron diffraction study of the hexagonal perovskite-type compound LaCrGe3, in Solid Compounds of Transition Elements II , Solid State Phenomena, Vol. 194 (Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2013) pp. 71–74

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Sologub, P

    O. Sologub, P. Salamakha, and C. Godart, Formation, crystal structure and magnetism of ternary compounds Ce5MGe2 (M=Co, Ni, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ir, Pt), Journal of Alloys and Compounds 307, 31 (2000)

    work page 2000

  42. [42]

    Skornia, J

    P. Skornia, J. Deniszczyk, M. Fija lkowski, and A. ´Slebarski, Magnetic and electrical transport proper- ties of Ce5RhGe2, Journal of Alloys and Compounds775, 524 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Skornia, J

    P. Skornia, J. Goraus, M. Fija lkowski, and A. ´Slebarski, Electronic structure and magnetic properties of the mag- netically ordered intermediate valent Ce5RuGe2, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 767, 512 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Skornia, J

    P. Skornia, J. Goraus, M. Fija lkowski, and A. ´Slebarski, Electronic structure, magnetic, electric transport, and thermal properties of Ce 5PdGe2, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 724, 222 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Pikul, M

    A. Pikul, M. Pasturel, P. Wi´ sniewski, A. Soud´ e, O. Tougait, H. No¨ el, and D. Kaczorowski, Magnetic and related properties of Ce5CoGe2, CeCoGe and CeCo2Ge2, Intermetallics 53, 40 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    D. Su, J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z. Shan, Y. Zhang, M. Smid- man, L. Jiao, Y. Liu, and H. Yuan, Coexistence of fer- romagnetism and cluster glass behavior in Ce 5CoGe2, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144432 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, K. Ye, D. Su, Y. Huang, Z. Shan, J. Li, R. Li, Y. Chen, X. Lu, L. Jiao, Y. Liu, M. Smidman, F. Steglich, and H. Yuan, Pressure-induced superconductivity beyond magnetic quantum critical- ity in a kondo ferromagnet, National Science Review , nwag119 (2026)

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    Suter and B

    A. Suter and B. Wojek, Musrfit: A free platform- independent framework for µSR data analysis, Physics Procedia 30, 69 (2012)

    work page 2012

  49. [49]

    L. C. Chapon, P. Manuel, P. G. Radaelli, C. Ben- son, L. Perrott, S. Ansell, N. J. Rhodes, D. Raspino, D. Duxbury, E. Spill, and J. Norris, Wish: The new powder and single crystal magnetic diffractometer on the second target station, Neutron News 22, 22 (2011)

    work page 2011

  50. [50]

    Petˇ r´ ıˇ cek, L

    V. Petˇ r´ ıˇ cek, L. Palatinus, J. Pl´ aˇ sil, and M. Duˇ sek, Jana2020 – a new version of the crystallographic comput- ing system Jana, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie - Crys- talline Materials 238, 271 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Perez-Mato, S

    J. Perez-Mato, S. Gallego, E. Tasci, L. Elcoro, G. de la Flor, and M. Aroyo, Symmetry-based computational tools for magnetic crystallography, Annual Review of Ma- terials Research 45, 217 (2015)

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    Rodriguez-Carvajal, J

    J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, J. Gonzalez-Platas, and N. A. Katcho, Magnetic structure determination and refine- ment using FullProf, Acta Crystallographica Section B 81, 302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Scheie, PyCrystalField: Software for Calculation, Analysis, and Fitting of Crystal Electric Field Hamiltoni- ans, Journal of Applied Crystallography 54, 356 (2021)

    A. Scheie, PyCrystalField: Software for Calculation, Analysis, and Fitting of Crystal Electric Field Hamiltoni- ans, Journal of Applied Crystallography 54, 356 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Toth and B

    S. Toth and B. Lake, Linear spin wave theory for single-Q incommensurate magnetic structures, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27, 166002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    Amato, Heavy-fermion systems studied by µsr tech- nique, Rev

    A. Amato, Heavy-fermion systems studied by µsr tech- nique, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 1119 (1997)

    work page 1997

  56. [56]

    R. S. Hayano, Y. J. Uemura, J. Imazato, N. Nishida, T. Yamazaki, and R. Kubo, Zero-and low-field spin re- laxation studied by positive muons, Phys. Rev. B20, 850 (1979)

    work page 1979

  57. [57]

    S. J. Blundell, R. De Renzi, T. Lancaster, and F. L. Pratt, Muon Spectroscopy: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Blundell, Magnetism in Condensed Matter (Oxford University Press, 2001)

    S. Blundell, Magnetism in Condensed Matter (Oxford University Press, 2001)

    work page 2001

  59. [59]

    A. Niggli, Zur Systematik Und Gruppentheoretischen Ableitung Der Symmetrie-, Antisymmetrie-Und Entar- tungssymmetriegruppen, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials 111, 288 (1959)

    work page 1959

  60. [60]

    M. S. Henriques, V. Petˇ r´ ıˇ cek, S. Goswami, and M. Duˇ sek, Analysis of magnetic structures in JANA2020, Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials 80, 409 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Walter, Treating Crystal Field Parameters in Lower than Cubic Symmetries, Journal of Physics and Chem- istry of Solids 45, 401 (1984)

    U. Walter, Treating Crystal Field Parameters in Lower than Cubic Symmetries, Journal of Physics and Chem- istry of Solids 45, 401 (1984)

    work page 1984

  62. [62]

    K. W. H. Stevens, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A 65, 209 (1952). 11

    work page 1952

  63. [63]

    Buschow, Chapter 4 Rare earth compounds, Handbook of Ferromagnetic Materials, Vol

    K. Buschow, Chapter 4 Rare earth compounds, Handbook of Ferromagnetic Materials, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, 1980) pp. 297–414

    work page 1980

  64. [64]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: Advances in physics and potential applications, Nature Reviews Materials 2, 17031 (2017)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    A. N. Bogdanov and C. Panagopoulos, Physical founda- tions and basic properties of magnetic skyrmions, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 492 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    X. Z. Yu, W. Koshibae, Y. Tokunaga, K. Shibata, Y. Taguchi, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Transformation between meron and skyrmion topological spin textures in a chiral magnet, Nature 564, 95 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Puphal, V

    P. Puphal, V. Pomjakushin, N. Kanazawa, V. Uk- leev, D. J. Gawryluk, J. Ma, M. Naamneh, N. C. Plumb, L. Keller, R. Cubitt, E. Pomjakushina, and J. S. White, Topological magnetic phase in the candidate weyl semimetal CeAlGe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 017202 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    Lengyel, M

    E. Lengyel, M. E. Macovei, A. Jesche, C. Krellner, C. Geibel, and M. Nicklas, Avoided ferromagnetic quan- tum critical point in CeRuPO, Phys. Rev. B 91, 035130 (2015)

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    Smidman, J

    M. Smidman, J. Wu, P. Manuel, C. Han, D. Adroja, and Y. Song, Neutron diffraction study of a Kondo ferromag- net with competing magnetic behaviours (2025)

    work page 2025