pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.24062 · v3 · submitted 2026-03-25 · 💻 cs.IT · math.IT

Rydberg Atomic Quantum Receivers for Wireless Communications: Two-Color vs. Three-Color Excitation

Jian Xiao , Tierui Gong , Ji Wang , Erry Gunawan , Chau Yuen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT math.IT
keywords Rydberg atomic quantum receiverthree-color excitationDoppler cancellationwireless communicationssensitivitylow-frequency detectionLiouvillian superoperator
0
0 comments X

The pith

A three-color laser scheme for Rydberg atomic receivers cancels Doppler broadening and reaches higher sensitivity than two-color designs or conventional antennas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a three-color laser excitation architecture for Rydberg atomic quantum receivers that uses a five-level atomic transition instead of the usual two-color four-level setup. This change replaces unstable blue lasers with stable red or infrared ones while creating a three-photon resonance that cancels residual Doppler shifts in thermal atoms. The new approach also removes the energy-level barrier that previously blocked low-frequency signal detection. An end-to-end baseband model is derived and performance is computed with the Liouvillian superoperator, showing better sensitivity and broader spectrum access at the cost of a sensitivity-capacity trade-off that favors power-limited links.

Core claim

The 3C5L-RAQR architecture with three-photon resonance enables effective Doppler cancellation and low-frequency detection while using all-red/infrared lasers, producing superior sensitivity compared to the conventional 2C4L-RAQR and classical conductor-antenna receivers, as shown by numerical evaluation of sensitivity, achievable capacity, and spectrum access range.

What carries the argument

Three-photon resonance in the five-level electronic transition system, which simultaneously cancels Doppler broadening and relaxes the two-photon energy constraint to permit low-frequency detection.

If this is right

  • The 3C5L-RAQR exhibits higher sensitivity than both the 2C4L-RAQR and classical conductor-antenna receivers.
  • Low-frequency wireless bands become detectable because the three-photon process removes the two-photon energy-level constraint.
  • An inherent sensitivity-capacity trade-off exists, making the 3C5L-RAQR preferable for power-limited scenarios that need wide spectrum access.
  • Exact numerical solutions for realistic RAQRs are obtained by applying the Liouvillian superoperator formalism to the five-level master equation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same multi-color resonance principle could be adapted to other atomic species or level schemes to target additional frequency bands without new laser hardware.
  • Hybrid systems that combine 3C5L-RAQRs with conventional antennas might extend coverage in mixed indoor-outdoor wireless networks.
  • Real-time calibration routines could be developed to maintain the three-photon resonance condition under varying temperature or laser-intensity drifts.

Load-bearing premise

The three-photon resonance in the five-level system enables effective Doppler cancellation and low-frequency detection without introducing new noise sources or requiring impractical laser stability.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement of signal-to-noise ratio for the same weak RF field at low carrier frequency using an actual 3C5L five-level atomic vapor versus a 2C4L four-level vapor would directly test whether the predicted sensitivity gain appears.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.24062 by Chau Yuen, Erry Gunawan, Jian Xiao, Ji Wang, Tierui Gong.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: EIT absorption spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: EIT absorption spectrum ℑ(ˆρ 4L 21 ) vs. probe detuning ∆p for different thermal-atom temperature Tatom of vapor cell. the Doppler effect ∆j (⃗v) = ∆j − ⃗kj⃗v, where ⃗kj is the wavevector of the j-th laser field. To minimize the Doppler mismatch, the probe and coupling beams are configured to be counter-propagating. We define the propagation direction of the probe beam as the positive z-axis and vz is the … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Transmission spectrum vs. coupling detuning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: SNR performance under different noise regimes of RAQRs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Probe laser intensity vs. SNR and ground-state atom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spectrum access range of RAQRs. 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3C5L SNR 2C4L SNR 3C5L Bandwidth 2C4L Bandwidth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Transmitting power Pt vs. SNR. -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Classical RF 2C4L-RAQR 3C5L-RAQR -80 -75 -70 0 0.05 0.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

An efficient three-color (3C) laser excitation-based Rydberg atomic quantum receiver (RAQR) architecture is investigated for wireless communications, utilizing a five-level (5L) electronic transition mechanism. Specifically, the conventional two-color (2C) RAQR with the four-level (4L) excitation faces three fundamental obstacles: 1) high cost and engineering challenges due to the reliance on unstable blue lasers; 2) a fundamental sensitivity limit in thermal atoms caused by residual Doppler broadening; and 3) the inability to detect low-frequency bands due to the energy-level constraint of two-photon resonance. To address these challenges, this paper analyzes a 3C5L-RAQR architecture with all-red/infrared lasers, which not only solves the engineering cost issues but also enables effective Doppler cancellation and low-frequency detection by exhibiting the three-photon resonance. Bridging atomic physics and communication theory, an end-to-end equivalent baseband signal model is derived. Furthermore, the performance of different RAQR architectures is evaluated in terms of sensitivity, achievable capacity and spectrum access range. Moreover, we provide an exact numerical solution for practical RAQRs by employing the Liouvillian superoperator formalism. Numerical results demonstrate that the exhibited 3C5L-RAQR achieves superior sensitivity compared to the conventional 2C4L-RAQR and the classical receiver based on the conductor antenna. Finally, the inherent sensitivity-capacity trade-off is revealed, showing that the 3C5L-RAQR is more suitable for deployment in power-limited communication scenarios demanding broad spectrum access.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a three-color five-level Rydberg atomic quantum receiver (3C5L-RAQR) using all red/IR lasers to overcome limitations of conventional two-color four-level (2C4L-RAQR) systems, including blue-laser instability, residual Doppler broadening in thermal atoms, and inability to detect low-frequency bands. It derives an end-to-end baseband signal model, solves the five-level master equation numerically via the Liouvillian superoperator, and evaluates sensitivity, capacity, and spectrum access, claiming superior sensitivity for 3C5L-RAQR over 2C4L-RAQR and classical antenna receivers while identifying a sensitivity-capacity trade-off.

Significance. If the derived model and numerics hold under realistic conditions, the work could advance practical Rydberg-based receivers by eliminating unstable blue lasers and enabling Doppler cancellation plus low-frequency operation. The explicit bridging of atomic physics with communication-theoretic metrics (capacity, spectrum access) and the use of the Liouvillian formalism for reproducible numerics are strengths that could influence quantum-enhanced wireless system design in power-limited regimes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Numerical Results / Liouvillian Formalism] The Liouvillian-based numerical solution (described in the performance evaluation section) omits finite laser linewidths as additional dephasing terms in the master equation. Without these, the reported sensitivity advantage of 3C5L-RAQR over 2C4L-RAQR may be an artifact of an idealized noise model rather than a robust physical result.
  2. [System Model / Three-Photon Resonance] The claim of effective Doppler cancellation via three-photon resonance assumes exact wavevector matching (k1 + k2 + k3 = 0) for the chosen red/IR wavelengths, but the end-to-end baseband model derivation does not explicitly verify residual velocity-dependent detuning or quantify the cancellation for thermal velocity distributions.
  3. [Numerical Results] The numerical results demonstrating superior sensitivity (abstract and results section) rest on the weakest assumption that three-photon resonance introduces no new noise sources; the manuscript should include a sensitivity analysis with imperfect cancellation or laser phase noise to support the central claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'exact numerical solution' via Liouvillian; clarify whether this is an exact closed-form or a numerical matrix exponentiation of the superoperator.
  2. [Baseband Model Derivation] Notation for the baseband equivalent model (e.g., signal mapping from RF field to atomic coherence) could be made more explicit with a dedicated equation block for communication theorists.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We agree that the idealized assumptions in the noise model and Doppler cancellation require explicit verification to strengthen the central claims. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate finite laser linewidths as dephasing terms, add explicit quantification of residual Doppler effects for thermal distributions, and include sensitivity analysis under imperfect conditions. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical Results / Liouvillian Formalism] The Liouvillian-based numerical solution (described in the performance evaluation section) omits finite laser linewidths as additional dephasing terms in the master equation. Without these, the reported sensitivity advantage of 3C5L-RAQR over 2C4L-RAQR may be an artifact of an idealized noise model rather than a robust physical result.

    Authors: We acknowledge that finite laser linewidths introduce additional dephasing not captured in the current monochromatic-laser assumption. In the revised manuscript we will augment the Liouvillian superoperator with explicit linewidth-induced dephasing rates for both the 3C5L and 2C4L architectures, then recompute the sensitivity, capacity, and spectrum-access metrics. This will establish whether the reported advantage persists under realistic laser conditions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [System Model / Three-Photon Resonance] The claim of effective Doppler cancellation via three-photon resonance assumes exact wavevector matching (k1 + k2 + k3 = 0) for the chosen red/IR wavelengths, but the end-to-end baseband model derivation does not explicitly verify residual velocity-dependent detuning or quantify the cancellation for thermal velocity distributions.

    Authors: The selected red/IR wavelengths were chosen to satisfy k1 + k2 + k3 ≈ 0. We agree that the derivation should explicitly quantify residual velocity-dependent detuning. In the revision we will add an analytical expression for the residual detuning as a function of atomic velocity and numerically evaluate the cancellation efficiency over a Maxwell-Boltzmann thermal distribution at room temperature, reporting the resulting effective linewidth broadening. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Numerical Results] The numerical results demonstrating superior sensitivity (abstract and results section) rest on the weakest assumption that three-photon resonance introduces no new noise sources; the manuscript should include a sensitivity analysis with imperfect cancellation or laser phase noise to support the central claim.

    Authors: We will add a dedicated sensitivity analysis that incorporates both imperfect wavevector matching (residual Doppler) and finite laser phase noise. The revised results section will present sensitivity curves for the 3C5L-RAQR under these non-ideal conditions alongside the ideal case and the 2C4L-RAQR benchmark, thereby directly supporting the superiority claim under realistic operating assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses standard Liouvillian formalism on independent physical model

full rationale

The paper derives an end-to-end baseband signal model for the 3C5L-RAQR by applying the standard Liouvillian superoperator to the five-level master equation, a first-principles method from quantum optics that does not reduce to fitted parameters or self-citations. Numerical sensitivity comparisons follow directly from solving these equations under stated assumptions about three-photon resonance and Doppler effects. No load-bearing step equates a prediction to its input by construction, renames a known result, or relies on an unverified self-citation chain; the formalism is externally verifiable and self-contained against atomic physics benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so specific free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be extracted. The approach relies on standard atomic-physics assumptions for Rydberg states and the Liouvillian formalism for open quantum systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5598 in / 1165 out tokens · 30586 ms · 2026-05-15T00:52:05.582344+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Quantum infor- mation with Rydberg atoms,

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, “Quantum infor- mation with Rydberg atoms,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 2313–2363, Aug. 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Digital communication with Rydberg atoms and amplitude-modulated microwave fields,

    D. H. Meyer, K. C. Cox, F. K. Fatemi, and P. D. Kunz, “Digital communication with Rydberg atoms and amplitude-modulated microwave fields,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 112, no. 21, May 2018

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    An atomic receiver for AM and FM radio communication,

    D. A. Anderson, R. E. Sapiro, and G. Raithel, “An atomic receiver for AM and FM radio communication,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 2455–2462, May 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    No free lunch theorems for optimization,

    D. H. Wolpert and W. G. Macready, “No free lunch theorems for optimization,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67–82, Apr. 1997

    work page 1997

  5. [5]

    Rydberg atom-based sensors: Principles, recent advances, and applications,

    D. Somaweera et al., “Rydberg atom-based sensors: Principles, recent advances, and applications,” Photonics, vol. 12, no. 12, Dec. 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Microwave electrometry with Rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances,

    J. A. Sedlacek, A. Schwettmann, H. Kübler, R. Löw, T. Pfau, and J. P. Shaffer, “Microwave electrometry with Rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances,” Nature Phys., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 819–824, Nov. 2012

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Detecting and receiving phase-modulated signals with a Ry- dberg atom-based receiver,

    C. L. Holloway, M. T. Simons, J. A. Gordon, and D. Novotny, “Detecting and receiving phase-modulated signals with a Ry- dberg atom-based receiver,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1853–1857, Sep. 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Simultane- ous multiband demodulation using a Rydberg atomic sensor,

    D. H. Meyer, J. C. Hill, P. D. Kunz, and K. C. Cox, “Simultane- ous multiband demodulation using a Rydberg atomic sensor,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 014025, Jan. 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Towards atomic MIMO receivers,

    M. Cui, Q. Zeng, and K. Huang, “Towards atomic MIMO receivers,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 659–673, Mar. 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Rydberg atomic quantum receivers for the multi-user MIMO uplink,

    T. Gong, C. Yuen, C. M. S. See, M. Debbah, and L. Hanzo, “Rydberg atomic quantum receivers for the multi-user MIMO uplink,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), 2025, pp. 4786–4791. 14

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Rydberg atomic quantum receivers for classical wireless communication and sensing,

    T. Gong, A. Chandra, C. Yuen, Y. L. Guan, R. Dumke, C. M. S. See, M. Debbah, and L. Hanzo, “Rydberg atomic quantum receivers for classical wireless communication and sensing,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 90–100, Oct. 2025

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Rydberg atomic quantum receivers for multi-target DOA estimation,

    T. Gong, C. Yuen, C. M. S. See, M. Debbah, and L. Hanzo, “Rydberg atomic quantum receivers for multi-target DOA estimation,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Rydberg atomic receivers for multi-band communi- cations and sensing,

    M. Cui, Q. Zeng, M. Chen, Z. Wang, T. Mao, D. Zheng, and K. Huang, “Rydberg atomic receivers for multi-band communi- cations and sensing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 13 384–13 400, Mar. 2026

    work page 2026

  14. [14]

    Electromagnetically induced transparency, absorption, and microwave-field sensing in a Rb vapor cell with a three-color all-infrared laser system,

    N. Thaicharoen, K. R. Moore, D. A. Anderson, R. C. Powel, E. Peterson, and G. Raithel, “Electromagnetically induced transparency, absorption, and microwave-field sensing in a Rb vapor cell with a three-color all-infrared laser system,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 100, p. 063427, Dec. 2019

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    High-power injection-locked blue laser for Rydberg atom-based sensing,

    X. Zuo, Q. Li, D. Li, H. Wu, J. Sheng, and H. Wu, “High-power injection-locked blue laser for Rydberg atom-based sensing,” Opt. Express, vol. 33, no. 14, pp. 29 247–29 254, Jul. 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Sensitivity com- parison of two-photon vs three-photon Rydberg electrometry,

    N. Prajapati, N. Bhusal, A. P. Rotunno et al., “Sensitivity com- parison of two-photon vs three-photon Rydberg electrometry,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 134, p. 023101, Jul. 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    High angular momentum coupling for enhanced Rydberg-atom sensing in the very-high frequency band,

    N. Prajapati et al., “High angular momentum coupling for enhanced Rydberg-atom sensing in the very-high frequency band,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 135, no. 7, Feb. 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Continuous broadband Rydberg receiver using AC Stark shifts and Floquet states,

    D. Song et al., “Continuous broadband Rydberg receiver using AC Stark shifts and Floquet states,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 125, no. 19, Nov. 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Continuously tunable radio frequency electrometry with Rydberg atoms,

    J. Hu et al., “Continuously tunable radio frequency electrometry with Rydberg atoms,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 121, no. 1, Jul. 2022

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Continuous radio-frequency electric-field detection through adjacent Rydberg resonance tuning,

    M. T. Simons et al., “Continuous radio-frequency electric-field detection through adjacent Rydberg resonance tuning,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 104, no. 3, p. 032824, Sep. 2021

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Continuous broadband microwave electric field measurement in Rydberg atoms based on the DC Stark effect,

    K. Ouyang, Y. Shi, M. Lei, and M. Shi, “Continuous broadband microwave electric field measurement in Rydberg atoms based on the DC Stark effect,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 123, no. 26, Dec. 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Very-high-and ultrahigh-frequency electric-field detection using high angular momentum Rydberg states,

    R. C. Brown, B. Kayim, M. A. Viray, A. R. Perry, B. C. Sawyer, and R. Wyllie, “Very-high-and ultrahigh-frequency electric-field detection using high angular momentum Rydberg states,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 107, no. 5, p. 052605, May 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Rydberg atoms for radio-frequency communications and sensing: Atomic receivers for pulsed RF field and phase detection,

    D. A. Anderson, R. E. Sapiro, and G. Raithel, “Rydberg atoms for radio-frequency communications and sensing: Atomic receivers for pulsed RF field and phase detection,” IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 48–56, Apr. 2020

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    P. R. Berman and V. S. Malinovsky, Principles of Laser Spectroscopy and Quantum Optics. Princeton Univ. Press, 2011

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Electric field metrology for SI traceabil- ity: Systematic measurement uncertainties in electromagneti- cally induced transparency in atomic vapor,

    C. L. Holloway et al., “Electric field metrology for SI traceabil- ity: Systematic measurement uncertainties in electromagneti- cally induced transparency in atomic vapor,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 121, no. 23, Jun. 2017

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Rydberg atomic quantum receivers for classical wireless communications and sensing: Their models and performance,

    T. Gong, J. Sun, C. Yuen, G. Hu, Y. Zhao, Y. L. Guan, C. M. S. See, M. Debbah, and L. Hanzo, “Rydberg atomic quantum re- ceivers for classical wireless communications and sensing: Their models and performance,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05554, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Electromag- netically induced transparency in ladder-type inhomogeneously broadened media: Theory and experiment,

    J. Gea-Banacloche, Y. Li, S. Jin, and M. Xiao, “Electromag- netically induced transparency in ladder-type inhomogeneously broadened media: Theory and experiment,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 51, pp. 576–584, Jan. 1995

    work page 1995

  28. [28]

    Optimal atomic quantum sensing using electromagnetically-induced-transparency readout,

    D. H. Meyer, C. O’Brien, D. P. Fahey, K. C. Cox, and P. D. Kunz, “Optimal atomic quantum sensing using electromagnetically-induced-transparency readout,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 104, no. 4, p. 043103, Dec. 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Coherent optical detection of highly excited Rydberg states using electro- magnetically induced transparency,

    A. K. Mohapatra, T. R. Jackson, and C. S. Adams, “Coherent optical detection of highly excited Rydberg states using electro- magnetically induced transparency,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 98, no. 11, p. 113003, Mar. 2007

    work page 2007

  30. [30]

    Doppler-free rydberg spectroscopy in a warm vapor,

    J. Glick, B. E. Anderson, T. N. Nunley, J. Bingaman, J. J. Liu, D. H. Meyer, and P. Kunz, “Doppler-free rydberg spectroscopy in a warm vapor,” Physical Review A, vol. 112, no. 6, p. 063726, Dec. 2025

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Electromagnetically induced transparency, narrow absorption and transient response in a three-photon excitation process,

    S. Mondal, D. Das, P. Dey, D. Bhattacharyya, and A. Bandy- opadhyay, “Electromagnetically induced transparency, narrow absorption and transient response in a three-photon excitation process,” Optik, vol. 265, p. 169410, Aug. 2022

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed Rydberg spectroscopy,

    M. Jing, Y. Hu, J. Ma, H. Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, “Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed Rydberg spectroscopy,” Nat. Phys., vol. 16, pp. 911–915, Sep. 2020

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Broadband Rydberg atom-based electric- field probe for SI-traceable, self-calibrated measurements,

    C. L. Holloway et al., “Broadband Rydberg atom-based electric- field probe for SI-traceable, self-calibrated measurements,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 6169–6182, Dec. 2014

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Continuous-frequency microwave heterodyne detection in an atomic vapor cell,

    X.-H. Liu et al., “Continuous-frequency microwave heterodyne detection in an atomic vapor cell,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 18, no. 5, p. 054003, Nov. 2022

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    The impact of thermal fields on Rydberg atom radio frequency sensors,

    C. Kaur, P. Shen, D. Booth, A. Todd, and J. P. Shaffer, “The impact of thermal fields on Rydberg atom radio frequency sensors,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.17506, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Effects of blackbody radiation on highly excited atoms,

    W. E. Cooke and T. F. Gallagher, “Effects of blackbody radiation on highly excited atoms,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 588, Feb. 1980

    work page 1980

  37. [37]

    Quantum shot noise limit in a Rydberg RF receiver compared to thermal noise limit in a conventional receiver,

    L. W. Bussey, F. A. Burton, K. Bongs, J. Goldwin, and T. Whitley, “Quantum shot noise limit in a Rydberg RF receiver compared to thermal noise limit in a conventional receiver,” IEEE Sensors Lett., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1–4, Sep. 2022

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2016

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    Sensitivity com- parison of two-photon vs three-photon Rydberg electrometry,

    N. Prajapati, N. Bhusal, A. P. Rotunno et al., “Sensitivity com- parison of two-photon vs three-photon Rydberg electrometry,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 134, no. 2, Jul. 2023

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    ARC: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali Rydberg atoms,

    N. Šibalić, J. D. Pritchard, C. S. Adams, and K. J. Weatherill, “ARC: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali Rydberg atoms,” Comput. Phys. Commun., vol. 220, pp. 319– 331, Nov. 2017

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Improvement of response bandwidth and sensitivity of ryd- berg receiver using multi-channel excitations,

    J. Hu, Y. Jiao, Y. He, H. Zhang, L. Zhang, J. Zhao, and S. Jia, “Improvement of response bandwidth and sensitivity of ryd- berg receiver using multi-channel excitations,” EPJ Quantum Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 51, Nov. 2023

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    On the capacity of a class of signal- dependent noise channels,

    H. Ghourchian, G. Aminian, A. Gohari, M. Mirmohseni, and M. Nasiri-Kenari, “On the capacity of a class of signal- dependent noise channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 7828–7846, Dec. 2018

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Cesium D line data,

    D. A. Steck, “Cesium D line data,” http://steck.us/alkalidata, 2025

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Quantum and atom optics,

    ——, “Quantum and atom optics,” http://steck.us/atomoptics, 2007

    work page 2007

  45. [45]

    Measurement and modelling of intensity dependent absorption and transit relaxation on the cesium D1 line,

    J. Sagle, R. K. Namiotka, and J. Huennekens, “Measurement and modelling of intensity dependent absorption and transit relaxation on the cesium D1 line,” J. Phys. B, At. Mol. Opt. Phys., vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2629–2643, Jun. 1996

    work page 1996

  46. [46]

    A computational toolbox for quantum and atomic optics,

    S. M. Tan, “A computational toolbox for quantum and atomic optics,” J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 424–432, Aug. 1999

    work page 1999

  47. [47]

    QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems,

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, “QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems,” Comput. Phys. Commun., vol. 184, no. 4, pp. 1234–1240, Apr. 2013

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Nineteen dubious ways to compute the exponential of a matrix, twenty-five years later,

    C. Moler and C. Van Loan, “Nineteen dubious ways to compute the exponential of a matrix, twenty-five years later,” SIAM Rev., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 3–49, Jan. 2003

    work page 2003

  49. [49]

    Discrete-time signal processing,

    H. Pfister, “Discrete-time signal processing,” Lecture Note, pfister. ee. duke. edu/courses/ece485/dtsp. pdf, 2017

    work page 2017