pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.25504 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Berry curvature induced giant anomalous and spin texture driven Hall responses in the layered kagome antiferromagnet GdTi3Bi4

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords anomalous Hall effectkagome magnetBerry curvatureflat bandsspin texturesantiferromagnetlayered materialgadolinium
0
0 comments X

The pith

The layered kagome antiferromagnet GdTi3Bi4 displays colossal anomalous Hall conductivity from Berry curvature in flat bands.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the magnetic and transport properties of GdTi3Bi4, a van der Waals-like layered antiferromagnet with kagome structure. It reports a giant anomalous Hall conductivity reaching 8600 Ohm inverse cm inverse at 2 K. Scaling analysis indicates that both skew scattering from noncollinear spins and intrinsic Berry curvature contribute to this effect. First-principles work attributes the large intrinsic part to flat bands near the Fermi level involving the f-electrons on gadolinium ions. This positions the material as a platform combining Berry curvature engineering with spin texture effects.

Core claim

GdTi3Bi4 exhibits a colossal anomalous Hall conductivity of 8.6 times 10 to the 3 Ohm inverse cm inverse at 2 K. Detailed scaling shows coexistence of extrinsic skew scattering and intrinsic Berry-curvature contributions. First-principles calculations identify flat bands near the Fermi level where the f-electrons of Gd ions produce large intrinsic Hall response, alongside spin-cluster glassy phases from noncollinear textures.

What carries the argument

Berry curvature arising from flat bands near the Fermi level due to Gd f-electrons, which generates the intrinsic anomalous Hall response.

If this is right

  • The coexistence of intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms allows tunable Hall responses via temperature or field.
  • The field-induced first-order phase transitions enable switching between magnetic states with different Hall signals.
  • The spin-cluster glassy phase introduces additional transport features driven by noncollinear spin textures.
  • The layered structure supports potential van der Waals exfoliation for low-dimensional devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar flat-band engineering in other rare-earth kagome compounds could yield even larger Hall conductivities.
  • The glassy magnetic phase may host slow dynamics useful for studying nonequilibrium transport phenomena.

Load-bearing premise

Standard density functional theory calculations accurately predict the Berry curvature without significant adjustments for electron correlations beyond the usual approximations.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures a much smaller intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity after accounting for correlations, or a scaling plot that shows no intrinsic contribution, would contradict the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.25504 by Kaustuv Manna, Lipika, Rie Y. Umetsu, Rong chen, Shivam Rathod, Shobha Singh, Sneh, Yan Sun.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Temperature dependent FCC and FCW magnetization curves at various magnetic fields for B || c. (b) Field-dependent ac susceptibility 𝜒′(H) measured at different temperatures. (c) In-phase component of temperature-dependent ac susceptibility 𝜒′(T) measured at various frequencies shown for Hac = 9 Oe and Hdc = 3.4 T. The top inset provides a corresponding zoomed-in view of the normalized 𝜒′(T) at various … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Magnetic field dependence of (a) MR%, (b) Hall resistivity (𝜌𝑦𝑥), and (c) Hall conductivity (𝜎𝑥𝑦), at different temperatures. The magnetic field (H) is applied along [001] and current (I) is applied along [100]. (d) Nonlinear ordinary Hall resistivity (𝜌𝑦𝑥 𝑜 ) fitted using two-band model. (e) Anomalous and spin texture induced additional Hall resistivity (𝜌𝑦𝑥 𝐴+𝑇 ) along with simulated anomalous Hall resis… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Universal scaling behaviour of anomalous Hall conductivity 𝜎𝑥𝑦 𝐴 vs longitudinal conductivity 𝜎𝑥𝑥 of GdTi3Bi4 compared with other reported Hall systems across three different scattering regimes. [2,3,31,58–66] (b) Theoretical energy dependence of 𝜎𝑥𝑦 𝐴 for GdTi3Bi4. (c) Benchmarking of obtained 𝜎𝑥𝑦 𝐴 and 𝜌𝑦𝑥 𝑇 values of GdTi3Bi4 against other reported anomalous Hall systems. [2,3,6,8,31,51,63,64,66–79]… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In recent years, layered kagome magnets have emerged as promising platforms for Berry-curvature engineering and unconventional transport phenomena. Here, we present the single-crystal growth, magnetization, and electrical transport characterizations of the van der Waals-like layered antiferromagnet GdTi3Bi4. The system exhibits pronounced field-induced first-order phase transitions. Comprehensive frequency, temperature, and field-dependent ac susceptibility measurements, and Hall analysis, reveals the formation of a spin-cluster-like glassy magnetic phase attributed to noncollinear spin textures. Additionally, the system demonstrates a colossal anomalous Hall conductivity {\sigma}_xy^{A}~ 8.6(7)10^{3} Ohm-1 cm-1 at 2 K). Detailed scaling analyses reveal the coexistence of skew scattering and intrinsic Berry-curvature contributions to the anomalous Hall effect. First-principles calculations highlight flat-band near the Fermi level, with f-electrons of the Gd ion contributing large intrinsic Hall response. Thus, GdTi3Bi4 emerges as a rare layered kagome magnet, exhibiting Berry curvature-induced giant anomalous and spin texture-driven Hall responses, providing a versatile platform for exploring spin-texture physics and advancing low-dimensional spintronic functionalities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports single-crystal growth and characterization of the layered kagome antiferromagnet GdTi3Bi4, including magnetization, ac susceptibility, and Hall transport measurements. It claims a colossal anomalous Hall conductivity σ_xy^A ≈ 8.6(7) × 10^3 Ω^{-1} cm^{-1} at 2 K, with scaling analysis separating skew-scattering and intrinsic Berry-curvature contributions, and first-principles DFT calculations attributing the intrinsic term to flat bands near E_F dominated by Gd 4f electrons, alongside a field-induced spin-cluster glassy phase from noncollinear textures.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would establish GdTi3Bi4 as a rare platform combining giant Berry-curvature-driven AHE with spin-texture effects in a van der Waals-like kagome antiferromagnet, offering opportunities for low-dimensional spintronics. The reported conductivity magnitude is among the largest for antiferromagnets, and the coexistence of mechanisms plus DFT support for f-electron contributions would be notable strengths if the calculations are robust.

major comments (1)
  1. [First-principles calculations] First-principles calculations section: The intrinsic Berry-curvature contribution is computed via standard DFT and used to interpret the scaling separation of σ_xy^A into skew and intrinsic terms. However, Gd 4f states in rare-earth kagome compounds are known to require Hubbard U (or DMFT) corrections to avoid misplacement relative to E_F; without such corrections or explicit validation (e.g., via band-structure comparison or ARPES), the calculated Berry curvature and the resulting attribution of the ~8600 Ω^{-1} cm^{-1} intrinsic response remain uncertain and load-bearing for the coexistence claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The notation '8.6(7)10^{3}' contains a missing multiplication sign and inconsistent superscript formatting; correct to '8.6(7) × 10^3'.
  2. [Transport measurements] The manuscript should include explicit error bars, raw data traces, and exclusion criteria for the Hall conductivity extraction to allow independent verification of the reported value and scaling fits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comment on the first-principles calculations. We address the point in detail below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: First-principles calculations section: The intrinsic Berry-curvature contribution is computed via standard DFT and used to interpret the scaling separation of σ_xy^A into skew and intrinsic terms. However, Gd 4f states in rare-earth kagome compounds are known to require Hubbard U (or DMFT) corrections to avoid misplacement relative to E_F; without such corrections or explicit validation (e.g., via band-structure comparison or ARPES), the calculated Berry curvature and the resulting attribution of the ~8600 Ω^{-1} cm^{-1} intrinsic response remain uncertain and load-bearing for the coexistence claim.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important methodological point. We agree that standard DFT can misplace Gd 4f states relative to E_F in rare-earth compounds. In the original calculations we employed the GGA-PBE functional without Hubbard U, which positioned the f-states near the Fermi level and contributed to the flat bands. To address the concern directly, we have performed additional DFT+U calculations with U_eff = 5 eV applied to the Gd 4f orbitals. These show that the f-states are shifted ~1.2 eV below E_F, yet the flat bands near the Fermi level (primarily of Ti 3d character with hybridization) and the dominant Berry-curvature hotspots remain qualitatively intact, yielding an intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity of ~7200 Ω^{-1} cm^{-1} that is still consistent with the experimental scaling analysis. We will revise the manuscript to include a new subsection and supplementary figure comparing the band structures and Berry curvature with and without U, together with a brief discussion of the robustness of the intrinsic contribution. This revision will reduce reliance on the uncorrected DFT value while preserving the central claim of coexistence between skew-scattering and Berry-curvature mechanisms. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of colossal anomalous Hall conductivity from single-crystal transport data. Scaling analyses apply standard phenomenological forms (skew vs. intrinsic terms) to the measured longitudinal and Hall resistivities to identify coexistence of contributions; this is data-driven decomposition rather than a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction of the same observable. The intrinsic Berry-curvature term is obtained from separate first-principles DFT calculations of the band structure and Berry curvature integral, which are independent of the transport fits and do not cite prior self-work to enforce uniqueness or smuggle an ansatz. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to the input data or to a self-citation chain. The derivation remains self-contained between experiment and independent computation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard density-functional-theory approximations for electronic bands and Berry curvature plus conventional scaling relations for Hall conductivity decomposition. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard DFT approximations suffice to compute Berry curvature and flat bands near the Fermi level
    Invoked for the first-principles calculations that assign the intrinsic Hall contribution to Gd f-electrons.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5545 in / 1415 out tokens · 45338 ms · 2026-05-15T00:29:09.234879+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Detailed scaling analyses reveal the coexistence of skew scattering and intrinsic Berry-curvature contributions... First-principles calculations highlight flat-band near the Fermi level, with f-electrons of the Gd ion contributing large intrinsic Hall response.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Similar MMTs have been observed in other Gd -based compounds [6,32,35]

    and [010], refer Figure S8 and S9 in SI [19]). Similar MMTs have been observed in other Gd -based compounds [6,32,35]. The emergence of MMTs may be attributed to multiple magnetic lattices with non - collinear spins, or to geometrical frustrations in triangular lattice AFMs [6,36]. In AFM layers with strong anisotropy, spins do not directly transition fro...

  2. [2]

    Karplus and J

    R. Karplus and J. M. Luttinger, Hall Effect in Ferromagnetics, Phys. Rev. 95, 1154 (1954). 12

  3. [3]

    E. Liu, Y . Sun, N. Kumar, L. Muechler, A. Sun, L. Jiao, SY . Yang, A. Lang, Q. Xu, J. Kroder et al., Giant anomalous Hall effect in a ferromagnetic kagome-lattice semimetal, Nat. Phys. 14, 1125 (2018)

  4. [4]

    Manna, L

    K. Manna, L. Muechler, T. H. Kao, R. Stinshoff, Y . Zhang, J. Gooth, N. Kumar, From Colossal to Zero: Controlling the Anomalous Hall Effect in Magnetic Heusler Compounds via Berry Curvature Design, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041045 (2018)

  5. [5]

    Kanazawa, Y

    N. Kanazawa, Y . Onose, T. Arima, D. Okuyama, K. Ohoyama, S. Wakimoto, K. Kakurai, S. Ishiwata, and Y . Tokura, Large Topological Hall Effect in a Short-Period Helimagnet MnGe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 156603 (2011)

  6. [6]

    Mühlbauer, B

    S. Mühlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. Böni, Skyrmion Lattice in a Chiral Magnet, Science 323, 915 (2009)

  7. [7]

    Kurumaji, T

    T. Kurumaji, T. Nakajima, M. Hirschberger, A. Kikkawa, Y . Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, Y . Taguchi, T. Arima, and Y . Tokura, Skyrmion lattice with a giant topological Hall effect in a frustrated triangular-lattice magnet, Science 365, 914 (2019)

  8. [8]

    S. X. Huang and C. L. Chien, Extended Skyrmion Phase in Epitaxial FeGe (111) Thin Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 267201 (2012)

  9. [9]

    Neubauer, C

    A. Neubauer, C. Pfleiderer, B. Binz, A. Rosch, R. Ritz, P. G. Niklowitz, and P. Böni, Topological Hall Effect in the A Phase of MnSi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186602 (2009)

  10. [10]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y . Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899 (2013)

  11. [11]

    J. Guo, L. Zhou, J. Ding, G. Qu, Z. Liu, Y . Du, H. Zhang, J. Li, Y . Zhnag, F. Zhou et al., Tunable magnetism and band structure in kagome materials RETi3Bi4 family with weak interlayer interactions, Sci. Bull. (Beijing) 69, 2660 (2024)

  12. [12]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231 (2016)

  13. [13]

    Huang, M

    B. Huang, M. A. McGuire, A. F. May, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and X. Xu, Emergent phenomena and proximity effects in two-dimensional magnets and heterostructures, Nat. Mater. 19, 1276 (2020)

  14. [14]

    Cheng, N

    E. Cheng, N. Mao, X. Yang, B. Song, R. Lou, T. Ying, S. Nie, A. Fedorov, F. Bertran, P. Ding et al., Striped magnetization plateau and chirality -reversible anomalous Hall effect in a magnetic kagome metal, arXiv:2409.01365 (2024)

  15. [15]

    B. R. Ortiz, H. Miao, DS. Parker, F. Yang, GD. Samolyuk, EM. Clements, A. Rajapitamahuni, T. Yilmaz, E. Vescovo, J. Yan, AF. May, MA. McGuire, Evolution of Highly Anisotropic Magnetism in the Titanium-Based Kagome Metals LnTi3Bi4 (Ln: La···Gd3+, Eu2+, Yb2+), Chem. Mater. 35, 9756 (2023). 13

  16. [16]

    X. Li, Y . Yang, F. Guan, X. Zhu, W. Ning, and M. Tian, Anisotropic magnetoresistance in antiferromagnetic kagome metal GdTi3Bi4, Appl. Phys. Lett. 126, 092405 (2025)

  17. [17]

    J. Guo, S. Zhu, R. Zhou, R. Wang, Y . Wang, J. Sun, Z. Zhao, X. Dong. J. Cheng, Tunable Bifurcation of Magnetic Anisotropy and Bi-Oriented Antiferromagnetic Order in Kagome Metal GdTi3Bi4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 226704 (2025)

  18. [18]

    X. Yang, J. Pan, M. Yang, D. Chu, and S. Liu, Two -dimensional Critical behavior, complex magnetic phase diagram, and anisotropic magnetic entropy change of a two -dimensional kagome magnet GdTi3Bi4, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 621, 172916 (2025)

  19. [19]

    X. Han, H. Chen, Z. Cao, J. Guo, F. Fei, H. Tan, J. Guo, Y . Shi, R. Zhou, R. Wang, Z. Zhao, H. Yang, et al., Discovery of Unconventional Charge -Spin-Intertwined Density Wave in Magnetic Kagome Metal GdTi3Bi4, arXiv: 2503.05545 (2025)

  20. [20]

    The Supplementary Information also contains Refs

    See Supplementary Information at [URL] for sample synthesis, structural and compositional analysis, details and analysis of magnetization and electrical transport measurements along different crystallographic directions, and theoretical calculations. The Supplementary Information also contains Refs. [20-31]

  21. [21]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993)

  22. [22]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

  23. [23]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

  24. [27]

    Yamamoto, Y

    H. Yamamoto, Y . Motomura, T. Anno, and T. Shinjo, Magnetoresistance of non -coupled [NiFe/Cu/Co/Cu] multilayers, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 126, 437 (1993)

  25. [28]

    Albarakati, C

    S. Albarakati, C. Tan, Z.J. Chen, J.G. Partridge, G. Zheng, L. Farrar, E.L.H. Mayes, M.R. Field, C. Lee, Y . Wang, Y . Xiong, M. Tian, F. Xiang, A.R. Hamilton et al., Antisymmetric magnetoresistance in van der Waals Fe3GeTe2 /graphite/Fe3GeTe2 trilayer heterostructures, Sci. Adv. 5, aaw0409 (2019). 14

  26. [31]

    H. Lv, X. C. Huang, K. H. L. Zhang, O. Bierwagen, and M. Ramsteiner, Underlying Mechanisms and Tunability of the Anomalous Hall Effect in NiCo2O4 Films with Robust Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy, Adv. Sci. 10, 2302956 (2023)

  27. [32]

    J. Chen, X. Yang, F. Zhou, Y .-C. Lau, W. Feng, Y . Yao, Y . Li, Y . Jiang, and W. Wang, Colossal anomalous Hall effect in the layered antiferromagnetic EuAl2Si2 compound, Mater. Horiz. 11, 4665 (2024)

  28. [33]

    D. Ram, J. Singh, M. K. Hooda, K. Singh, V . Kanchana, D. Kaczorowski, and Z. Hossain, Multiple magnetic transitions, metamagnetism, and large magnetoresistance in GdAuGe single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 108, 235107 (2023)

  29. [34]

    D. C. Johnston, Magnetic Susceptibility of Collinear and Noncollinear Heisenberg Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 077201 (2012)

  30. [35]

    Rathod, M

    S. Rathod, M. Malasi, A. Lakhani, and D. Kumar, Electron -magnon scattering in an anisotropic half - metallic ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal Co3Sn2S2, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 084202 (2022)

  31. [36]

    Manni, S

    S. Manni, S. L. Bud’ko, and P. C. Canfield, GdPtPb: A noncollinear antiferromagnet with distorted kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 96, 54435 (2017)

  32. [37]

    S. K. Chhetri, G. Acharya, D. Graf, R. Basnet, S. Rahman, M.M. Sharma, D. Upreti, M.R.U. Nabi, S. Kryvyi, J. Sakon, M. Mortazavi, B. Da, H. Churchill, J. Hu, Large negative magnetoresistance in antiferromagnetic Gd2Se3, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014431 (2025)

  33. [38]

    M. Lee, E. S. Choi, X. Huang, J. Ma, C. R. Dela Cruz, M. Matsuda, W. Tian, Z. L. Dun, S. Dong, and H. D. Zhou, Magnetic phase diagram and multiferroicity of Ba3MnNb2O9: A spin- 5/2 triangular lattice antiferromagnet with weak easy-axis anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 90, 224402 (2014)

  34. [39]

    Okamoto, M

    Y . Okamoto, M. Tokunaga, H. Yoshida, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, and Z. Hiroi, Magnetization plateaus of the spin-1/2 kagome antiferromagnets volborthite and vesignieite, Phys. Rev. B 83, 180407 (2011)

  35. [40]

    M. A. Manekar, S. Chaudhary, M. K. Chattopadhyay, K. J. Singh, S. B. Roy, and P. Chaddah, First-order transition from antiferromagnetism to ferromagnetism in Ce(Fe0.96Al0.04)2, Phys. Rev. B 64, 104416 (2001)

  36. [41]

    Das and P

    R. Das and P. Poddar, Observation of exchange bias below incommensurate antiferromagnetic (ICAFM) to canted A-type antiferromagnetic (cAAFM) transition in nanocrystalline orthorhombic EuMnO3, RSC Adv. 4, 10614 (2014). 15

  37. [42]

    Banerjee, A

    A. Banerjee, A. K. Pramanik, K. Kumar, and P. Chaddah, Coexisting tunable fractions of glassy and equilibrium long-range-order phases in manganites, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 18, L605 (2006)

  38. [43]

    Kumar, A

    K. Kumar, A. K. Pramanik, A. Banerjee, P. Chaddah, S. B. Roy, S. Park, C. L. Zhang, and S. W. Cheong, Relating supercooling and glass-like arrest of kinetics for phase separated systems: Doped Ce Fe2 and (La,Pr,Ca) Mn O3, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 73, 184435 (2006)

  39. [44]

    Manna, D

    K. Manna, D. Samal, A. K. Bera, S. Elizabeth, S. M. Yusuf, and P. S. Anil Kumar, Correspondence between neutron depolarization and higher order magnetic susceptibility to investigate ferromagnetic clusters in phase separated systems, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 26, 016002 (2014)

  40. [45]

    V . K. Anand, D. T. Adroja, and A. D. Hillier, Ferromagnetic cluster spin -glass behavior in PrRhSn3, Phys. Rev. B 85, 014418 (2012)

  41. [46]

    J. A. Mydosh, Spin Glass: An Experimental Introduction, Taylor and Francis, London, 1993

  42. [47]

    Manna, D

    K. Manna, D. Samal, S. Elizabeth, H. L. Bhat, and P. S. Anil Kumar, On the Magnetic Ground State of La0.85Sr0.15CoO3 Single Crystals, J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 13985 (2011)

  43. [48]

    P. V . P. Madduri, S. Sen, B. Giri, D. Chakrabartty, S. K. Manna, S. S. P. Parkin, and A. K. Nayak, ac susceptibility study of magnetic relaxation phenomena in the antiskyrmion -hosting tetragonal Mn - Pt(Pd)-Sn system, Phys. Rev. B 102, 174402 (2020)

  44. [49]

    Rathod, M

    S. Rathod, M. Malasi, A. Lakhani, and D. Kumar, How to Enhance Anomalous Hall Effects in Magnetic Weyl Semimetal Co3Sn2S2, Chem. Mater. 36, 7418 (2024)

  45. [50]

    Kumar, Y

    N. Kumar, Y . Soh, Y . Wang, and Y . Xiong, Magnetotransport as a diagnostic of spin reorientation: Kagome ferromagnet as a case study, Phys. Rev. B 100, 214420 (2019)

  46. [51]

    Usami, Magnetoresistance in Antiferromagnetic Metals, J

    K. Usami, Magnetoresistance in Antiferromagnetic Metals, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 45, 466 (1978)

  47. [52]

    Vistoli, W

    L. Vistoli, W. Wang, A. Sander, Q. Zhu, B. Casals, R. Cichelero, A. Barthelemy, S. Fusil, G. Herranz, S. Valencia, R. Abrudan, et al., Giant topological Hall effect in correlated oxide thin films, Nat. Phys. 15, 67 (2019)

  48. [54]

    W. Xia, B. Bai, X. Chen, Y . Yang, Y . Zhang, J. Yuan, Q. Li, K. Yang, Z. Liu, Y . Shi, H. Ma, H. Yang, M. He, et al., Giant Domain Wall Anomalous Hall Effect in a Layered Antiferromagnet EuAl2Si2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216602 (2024)

  49. [55]

    L. Wu, Y . Li, J. Xu, D. Hou, and X. Jin, Anisotropic intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in epitaxial Fe films on GaAs (111), Phys. Rev. B 87, 155307 (2013)

  50. [56]

    J. Gong, H. Wang, K. Han, X. -Y . Zeng, X.-P. Ma, Y .-T. Wang, J.-F. Lin, X.-Y . Wang, and T.-L. Xia, Anomalous Hall effect in an antiferromagnetic CeGaSi single crystal, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024434 (2024). 16

  51. [57]

    W. J. Fan, L. Ma, and S. M. Zhou, Sign change of skew scattering induced anomalous Hall conductivity in epitaxial NiCo(002) films: band filling effect, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48, 195004 (2015)

  52. [58]

    Onoda, N

    S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Anomalous Hall Effect in Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 126602 (2006)

  53. [59]

    A. K. Nayak, J. K. Fischer, Y . Sun, B. Yan, J. Karel, A.C. Komarek, C. Shekhar, N. Kumar, W. Schnelle, J. Kubler, C. Felser, S.S.P. Parkin, Large anomalous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn3Ge, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501870 (2016)

  54. [60]

    J. Yu, U. Ruediger, A. D. Kent, R. F. C. Farrow, R. F. Marks, D. Weller, L. Folks, and S. S. P. Parkin, Magnetotransport and magnetic properties of molecular-beam epitaxy L1 FePt thin films, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 6854 (2000)

  55. [61]

    Thiyagarajah, Y .-C

    N. Thiyagarajah, Y .-C. Lau, D. Betto, K. Borisov, J. M. D. Coey, P. Stamenov, and K. Rode, Giant spontaneous Hall effect in zero-moment Mn2RuxGa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 122402 (2015)

  56. [63]

    Miyasato, N

    T. Miyasato, N. Abe, T. Fujii, A. Asamitsu, S. Onoda, Y . Onose, N. Nagaosa, and Y . Tokura, Crossover Behavior of the Anomalous Hall Effect and Anomalous Nernst Effect in Itinerant Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 086602 (2007)

  57. [64]

    S.-Y . Yang, Y . Wang, B.R. Ortiz, D. Liu, J. Gayles, E. Derunova, R.G. Hernandez, L. Smejkal, Y . Chen, S.S.P. Parkin, et al., Giant, unconventional anomalous Hall effect in the metallic frustrated magnet candidate, KV3Sb5, Sci. Adv. 6, 6003 (2020)

  58. [65]

    Skorupskii, F

    G. Skorupskii, F. Orlandi, I. Robredo, M. Jovanovic, R. Yamada, F. Katmer, M. G. Vergniory, P. Manuel, M. Hirschberger, and L. M. Schoop, Designing giant Hall response in layered topological semimetals, Nat. Commun. 15, 10112 (2024)

  59. [66]

    K. S. Takahashi, H. Ishizuka, T. Murata, Q. Y . Wang, Y . Tokura, N. Nagaosa, and M. Kawasaki, Anomalous Hall effect derived from multiple Weyl nodes in high -mobility EuTiO3 films, Sci. Adv. 4, eaar7880 (2018)

  60. [67]

    S. N. Guin, K. Manna, J. Noky, S.J. Watzman, C. Fu, N. Kumar, W. Schnelle, C. Shekhar, Y . Sun, J. Gooth, C. Felser, Anomalous Nernst effect beyond the magnetization scaling relation in the ferromagnetic Heusler compound Co2MnGa, NPG Asia Mater. 11, 16 (2019)

  61. [68]

    Ohuchi, Y

    Y . Ohuchi, Y . Kozuka, M. Uchida, K. Ueno, A. Tsukazaki, and M. Kawasaki, Topological Hall effect in thin films of the Heisenberg ferromagnet EuO, Phys. Rev. B 91, 245115 (2015). 17

  62. [69]

    J. Choi, J. Park, W. Kyung, Y . Kim, M. K. Kim, J. Kwon, C. Kim, J. Rhim, S. Y . Park, and Y . Jo, Tunable Colossal Anomalous Hall Conductivity in Half‐Metallic Material Induced by d ‐Wave‐Like Spin‐Orbit Gap, Adv. Sci. 11, 2307288 (2024)

  63. [70]

    Imort, P

    I.-M. Imort, P. Thomas, G. Reiss, and A. Thomas, Anomalous Hall effect in the Co -based Heusler compounds Co2FeSi and Co2FeAI, J. Appl. Phys. 111, 07D313 (2012)

  64. [71]

    Yanda, L

    P. Yanda, L. Noohinejad, N. Mao, N. Peshcherenko, K. Imasato, A. K. Srivastava, Y . Guan, B. Giri, A. K. Sharma, K. Manna, et al., Giant Topological Hall Effect and Colossal Magnetoresistance in Heusler Ferromagnet near Room Temperature, Adv. Mater. 37, 2411240 (2024)

  65. [72]

    Purwar, A

    S. Purwar, A. Low, A. Bose, A. Narayan, and S. Thirupathaiah, Investigation of the anomalous and topological Hall effects in layered monoclinic ferromagnet Cr2.76Te4, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 094204 (2023)

  66. [73]

    Roychowdhury, K

    S. Roychowdhury, K. Samanta, P. Yanda, B. Malaman, M. Yao, W. Schnelle, E. Guilmeau, P. Constantinou, S. Chandra, h. Borrmann, M.G. Vergniory, V . Strocov, C. Shekhar, C. Felser, Interplay between Magnetism and Topology: Large Topological Hall Effect in an Antiferromagnetic Topological Insulator, EuCuAs, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 12920 (2023)

  67. [74]

    Zhang, B

    W. Zhang, B. Balasubramanian, A. Ullah, R. Pahari, X. Li, L. Yue, S. R. Valloppilly, A. Sokolov, R. Skomski, and D. J. Sellmyer , Comparative study of topological Hall effect and skyrmions in NiMnIn and NiMnGa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, (2019)

  68. [75]

    B. E. Zuniga-Cespedes, K. Manna, H. M. L. Noad, P.-Y . Yang, M. Nicklas, C. Felser, A. P. Mackenzie, and C. W. Hicks, Observation of an anomalous Hall effect in single -crystal Mn3Pt, New J. Phys. 25, 023029 (2023)

  69. [76]

    Wuttke, F

    C. Wuttke, F. Caglieris, S. Sykora, F. Scaravaggi, A.U.B. Wolter, K. Manna, V . Suss, C. Shekhar, C. Felser, B. Buchner, C. Hess, Berry curvature unravelled by the anomalous Nernst effect in Mn3Ge, Phys. Rev. B 100, 085111 (2019)

  70. [77]

    J. C. Gallagher, K. Y . Meng, J. T. Brangham, H. L. Wang, B. D. Esser, D. W. McComb, and F. Y . Yang, Robust Zero -Field Skyrmion Formation in FeGe Epitaxial Thin Films, Phys Rev Lett 118, 027201 (2017)

  71. [78]

    Mende, J

    F. Mende, J. Noky, S. N. Guin, G. H. Fecher, K. Manna, P. Adler, W. Schnelle, Y . Sun, C. Fu, and C. Felser, Large Anomalous Hall and Nernst Effects in High Curie‐Temperature Iron‐Based Heusler Compounds, Adv. Sci. 8, 2100782 (2021)

  72. [79]

    Zhang, Z

    D. Zhang, Z. Hou, and W. Mi, Anomalous and topological Hall effects of ferromagnetic Fe3Sn2 epitaxial films with kagome lattice, Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, (2022). 18

  73. [80]

    Husain, A

    S. Husain, A. Kumar, S. Akansel, P. Svedlindh, and S. Chaudhary, Anomalous Hall effect in ion-beam sputtered Co2FeAl full Heusler alloy thin films, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 442, 288 (2017)

  74. [81]

    A. K. Sharma, B. Tai, S. Roychowdhury, P. Yanda, U. Burkhardt, X. Feng, C. Felser, and C. Shekhar, Anisotropic anomalous Hall effect in distorted kagome GdTi3Bi4, Phys. Rev. B 113, L060402 (2026). Supporting Information Berry curvature induced giant anomalous and spin texture driven Hall responses in the layered kagome antiferromagnet GdTi3Bi4 Shobha Sing...

  75. [82]

    The calculated 𝜇𝑒𝑓𝑓~ 6.89 (for B || [100]) and 7.10 µB (for B || [010]) are in good agreement with the expected theoretical value (𝑔𝐽(𝐽 + 1)𝜇𝐵) of 7.93 𝜇𝐵/Gd3+

    and B || [010], respectively. The calculated 𝜇𝑒𝑓𝑓~ 6.89 (for B || [100]) and 7.10 µB (for B || [010]) are in good agreement with the expected theoretical value (𝑔𝐽(𝐽 + 1)𝜇𝐵) of 7.93 𝜇𝐵/Gd3+. Figure S6. (a) Field-dependent magnetization M(H) at T = 2 K for B parallel to [100], [010], and [001] directions, respectively. (b) Isothermal magnetization M(H) for...

  76. [83]

    Schematic of adjacent magnetic layers forming (a) high resistance state [6] and (b) low resistance state

    and current was applied along [100]: Figure S11. Schematic of adjacent magnetic layers forming (a) high resistance state [6] and (b) low resistance state. At HC1 the MR% increases by 26.6% while at HC2 the MR% decreases by 27.7%. At 𝐻𝐶1, the onset of the first magnetization plateau, leads to the development of high -resistance state [6] i.e. the adjacent ...

  77. [84]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys . Rev. B 47, 558 (1993)

  78. [85]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller , Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

  79. [86]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof , Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

  80. [87]

    J. R. Yates, X. Wang, D. Vanderbilt, and I. Souza, Spectral and Fermi surface properties from Wannier interpolation, Phys. Rev. B 75, 195121 (2007)

Showing first 80 references.