pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.25534 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-26 · ⚛️ physics.bio-ph · physics.optics

Label-free Imaging of Single-Biomolecule Structure and Interaction by Stimulated Raman Photothermal Encoded Scattering

Pin-Tian Lyu , Yifan Zhu , Qing Xia , Guangrui Ding , Arvind Pillai , Xinru Wang , Jianpeng Ao , Haonan Lin
show 3 more authors
Lulu Jiang David Baker Ji-Xin Cheng
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.bio-ph physics.optics
keywords stimulated Raman scatteringphotothermal microscopysingle-molecule imaginglabel-freeprotein structurebiomolecular interactionsinterferometric scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Stimulated Raman photothermal encoded scattering images single proteins with chemical specificity without labels

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces SRPSCAT microscopy that modulates a molecule's scattering signal using energy deposited by stimulated Raman gain and loss processes. This encodes vibrational information into the interferometric scattering readout, enabling bond-selective imaging at the single-molecule level in native aqueous environments. A reader would care because the method determines protein mass, distinguishes secondary structures from Raman fingerprints, quantifies binding kinetics, and tracks conformational changes in designed proteins, all without fluorescent labels.

Core claim

SRPSCAT microscopy achieves quantitative bond-selective imaging of single-biomolecule structures and interactions by using the photothermal effect from stimulated Raman processes to modulate interferometric scattering, thereby encoding chemical information directly into the scattering signal for label-free analysis in native conditions.

What carries the argument

Stimulated Raman photothermal encoded scattering (SRPSCAT), the process that modulates target-molecule scattering via energy deposited from stimulated Raman gain and loss to encode vibrational spectroscopic information.

Load-bearing premise

Energy deposited by stimulated Raman processes must create a detectable photothermal change in scattering from a single molecule that exceeds background noise and other thermal effects in aqueous solution.

What would settle it

Application of the Raman pump and probe beams to a single known protein produces no modulated scattering signal above background or yields a spectrum that cannot be matched to the molecule's known Raman fingerprint.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.25534 by Arvind Pillai, David Baker, Guangrui Ding, Haonan Lin, Jianpeng Ao, Ji-Xin Cheng, Lulu Jiang, Pin-Tian Lyu, Qing Xia, Xinru Wang, Yifan Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Principle, setup and performance of SRPSCAT. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Quantitative mass imaging of single proteins with SRPSCAT. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Elucidating protein secondary structure with SRPSCAT. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Observing single protein binding kinetics with SRPSCAT. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Monitoring conformational dynamics of de novo designed allosteric proteins in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Current single molecule methods either rely on fluorescence or lack chemical information. Here we report stimulated Raman photothermal encoded scattering (SRPSCAT) microscopy for quantitative bond-selective imaging of single-biomolecule structures and interactions in native environments. In this approach, scattering of the target molecule is modulated by the deposited energy from stimulated Raman gain and loss processes, thereby encoding vibrational spectroscopic information. Leveraging single-molecule sensitivity of interferometric scattering, SRPSCAT can map single proteins with chemical specificity, determine their mass, and distinguish protein secondary structures based on their Raman fingerprints. Furthermore, single protein binding kinetics are quantified and the conformational dynamics of single de novo designed allosteric proteins are observed. Together, these results highlight the potential of SRPSCAT for label-free structural, functional and dynamic analysis at the single-molecule level.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces stimulated Raman photothermal encoded scattering (SRPSCAT) microscopy, which uses energy deposited by stimulated Raman gain and loss to modulate the interferometric scattering signal of single biomolecules. This is claimed to enable label-free, bond-selective imaging of single proteins in native environments, including chemical-specific mapping, mass determination, distinction of secondary structures from Raman fingerprints, quantification of single-protein binding kinetics, and observation of conformational dynamics in de novo designed allosteric proteins.

Significance. If the central experimental claims are substantiated with adequate controls and quantitative validation, the work would offer a meaningful advance in single-molecule biophysics by combining vibrational chemical specificity with the sensitivity of interferometric scattering, without requiring fluorescent labels. This could enable structural and dynamic studies of biomolecules under physiological conditions that are currently inaccessible to purely scattering or fluorescence-based methods.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Results (single-protein imaging)] The abstract asserts quantitative capabilities (mass determination, binding kinetics, secondary-structure distinction) but supplies no data, controls, error bars, or exclusion criteria. The results section must include explicit SNR calculations and calibration measurements showing that the photothermal modulation amplitude from stimulated Raman exceeds the iSCAT noise floor (~10^{-5}–10^{-4}) for single ~5 nm proteins in aqueous buffer; without this, the link between Raman energy deposition and observed contrast remains unverified.
  2. [Results and Methods (photothermal modulation)] The central assumption that stimulated Raman gain/loss deposits sufficient energy to produce a detectable temperature-induced refractive-index shift (estimated ΔT <1 mK under realistic pump powers, yielding fractional scattering changes of 10^{-5}–10^{-6}) must be directly tested. No independent calibration of photothermal conversion efficiency or comparison against shot-noise/background limits appears in the provided description; this is load-bearing for all quantitative claims.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the SRPSCAT acronym and the distinction between stimulated Raman gain versus loss contributions should be clarified on first use for readers unfamiliar with the hybrid scheme.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below, providing clarifications from the full text and indicating where revisions will strengthen the presentation of quantitative validations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Results (single-protein imaging)] The abstract asserts quantitative capabilities (mass determination, binding kinetics, secondary-structure distinction) but supplies no data, controls, error bars, or exclusion criteria. The results section must include explicit SNR calculations and calibration measurements showing that the photothermal modulation amplitude from stimulated Raman exceeds the iSCAT noise floor (~10^{-5}–10^{-4}) for single ~5 nm proteins in aqueous buffer; without this, the link between Raman energy deposition and observed contrast remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that explicit SNR calculations, calibration data, error bars, and exclusion criteria are necessary to substantiate the quantitative claims. The full manuscript presents experimental results on single-protein imaging with chemical specificity, mass determination via scattering contrast, secondary-structure distinction from Raman fingerprints, and binding kinetics, including figures showing detectable contrast levels for ~5 nm proteins. To address the referee's concern directly, we will revise the Results section to add a dedicated subsection with SNR calculations, calibration measurements against the iSCAT noise floor, error bars, and data exclusion criteria, explicitly linking the stimulated Raman energy deposition to the observed photothermal modulation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and Methods (photothermal modulation)] The central assumption that stimulated Raman gain/loss deposits sufficient energy to produce a detectable temperature-induced refractive-index shift (estimated ΔT <1 mK under realistic pump powers, yielding fractional scattering changes of 10^{-5}–10^{-6}) must be directly tested. No independent calibration of photothermal conversion efficiency or comparison against shot-noise/background limits appears in the provided description; this is load-bearing for all quantitative claims.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that independent verification of the photothermal mechanism is critical. The manuscript includes estimates of energy deposition from stimulated Raman gain/loss and the resulting ΔT and refractive-index changes in the Methods, with experimental signals shown to exceed background in the Results. We will revise the Methods and Results to incorporate additional independent calibration of photothermal conversion efficiency, direct comparisons to shot-noise and background limits, and explicit testing of the temperature-induced scattering modulation for single proteins in aqueous buffer. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration without derivations or self-referential claims

full rationale

The paper presents SRPSCAT as an experimental optical technique relying on standard interferometric scattering and stimulated Raman processes. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chains appear in the abstract or described claims. All results are framed as empirical observations of single-molecule signals, with no self-definitional loops, fitted inputs called predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central result to its inputs by construction. The work is self-contained as a methods demonstration against external benchmarks of iSCAT sensitivity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on established optical physics with one new encoding step; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • photothermal modulation scaling factor
    Experimental calibration constant needed to convert Raman-induced heating into scattering amplitude change; value not reported in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Stimulated Raman gain and loss deposit localized energy that produces measurable photothermal modulation of molecular scattering
    Standard principle from Raman and photothermal microscopy literature, invoked to justify signal encoding at single-molecule level.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5472 in / 1333 out tokens · 58150 ms · 2026-05-15T00:09:34.496250+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. Yu, J. Xiao, X. Ren, K. Lao, X. S. Xie, Probing gene expression in live cells, One protein molecule at a time. Science 311, 1600–1603 (2006)

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Betzig, G

    E. Betzig, G. H. Patterson, R. Sougrat, O. W. Lindwasser, S. Olenych, J. S. Bonifacino, M. W. Davidson, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, H. F. Hess, Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313, 1642–1645 (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    M. J. Rust, M. Bates, X. Zhuang, Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat. Methods 3, 793–796 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Piliarik, V

    M. Piliarik, V. Sandoghdar, Direct optical sensing of single unlabelled proteins and super- resolution imaging of their binding sites. Nat. Commun. 5, 4495 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Young, N

    G. Young, N. Hundt, D. Cole, A. Fineberg, J. Andrecka, A. Tyler, A. Olerinyova, A. Ansari, E. G. Marklund, M. P. Collier, S. A. Chandler, O. Tkachenko, J. Allen, M. Crispin, N. Billington, Y. Takagi, J. R. Sellers, C. Eichmann, P. Selenko, L. Frey, R. Riek, M. R. Galpin, W. B. Struwe, J. L. P. Benesch, P. Kukura, Quantitative mass imaging of single biolog...

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    C. Joo, H. Balci, Y. Ishitsuka, C. Buranachai, T. Ha, Advances in single-molecule fluorescence methods for molecular biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 51–76 (2008). 18

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Okamoto, M

    K. Okamoto, M. Hiroshima, Y. Sako, Single-molecule fluorescence-based analysis of protein conformation, interaction, and oligomerization in cellular systems. Biophys. Rev. 10, 317–326 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Severins, C

    I. Severins, C. Bastiaanssen, S. H. Kim, R. B. Simons, J. Van Noort, C. Joo, Single- molecule structural and kinetic studies across sequence space. Science 385, 898–904 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Lindfors, T

    K. Lindfors, T. Kalkbrenner, P. Stoller, V. Sandoghdar, Detection and spectroscopy of gold nanoparticles using supercontinuum white light confocal microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 037401 (2004)

    work page 2004

  10. [10]

    Zhang, G

    P. Zhang, G. Ma, W. Dong, Z. Wan, S. Wang, N. Tao, Plasmonic scattering imaging of single proteins and binding kinetics. Nat. Methods 17, 1010–1017 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Zhang, L

    P. Zhang, L. Zhou, R. Wang, X. Zhou, J. Jiang, Z. Wan, S. Wang, Evanescent scattering imaging of single protein binding kinetics and DNA conformation changes. Nat. Commun. 13, 2298 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    S. Nie, S. R. Emory, Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface- enhanced Raman scattering. Science 275, 1102–1106 (1997)

    work page 1997

  13. [13]

    Kneipp, Y

    K. Kneipp, Y. Wang, H. Kneipp, L. T. Perelman, I. Itzkan, R. R. Dasari, M. S. Feld, Single molecule detection using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1667–1670 (1997)

    work page 1997

  14. [14]

    T.-W. Koo, S. Chan, A. A. Berlin, Single-molecule detection of biomolecules by surface- enhanced coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering. Opt. Lett. 30, 1024 (2005)

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Zhang, Y.-R

    Y. Zhang, Y.-R. Zhen, O. Neumann, J. K. Day, P. Nordlander, N. J. Halas, Coherent anti- Stokes Raman scattering with single-molecule sensitivity using a plasmonic Fano resonance. Nat. Commun. 5, 4424 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    Yampolsky, D

    S. Yampolsky, D. A. Fishman, S. Dey, E. Hulkko, M. Banik, E. O. Potma, V. A. Apkarian, Seeing a single molecule vibrate through time-resolved coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering. Nat. Photonics 8, 650–656 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    C. Zong, R. Premasiri, H. Lin, Y. Huang, C. Zhang, C. Yang, B. Ren, L. D. Ziegler, J.-X. Cheng, Plasmon-enhanced stimulated Raman scattering microscopy with single-molecule detection sensitivity. Nat. Commun. 10, 5318 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Xiong, L

    H. Xiong, L. Shi, L. Wei, Y. Shen, R. Long, Z. Zhao, W. Min, Stimulated Raman excited fluorescence spectroscopy and imaging. Nat. Photonics 13, 412–417 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Min, J.-X

    W. Min, J.-X. Cheng, Y. Ozeki, Theory, innovations and applications of stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Nat. Photonics 19, 803–816 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Y. Zhu, X. Ge, H. Ni, J. Yin, H. Lin, L. Wang, Y. Tan, C. V. Prabhu Dessai, Y. Li, X. Teng, J.-X. Cheng, Stimulated Raman photothermal microscopy toward ultrasensitive chemical imaging. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi2181 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Gaiduk, M

    A. Gaiduk, M. Yorulmaz, P. V. Ruijgrok, M. Orrit, Room-temperature detection of a single molecule’s absorption by photothermal contrast. Science 330, 353–356 (2010)

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    Adhikari, P

    S. Adhikari, P. Spaeth, A. Kar, M. D. Baaske, S. Khatua, M. Orrit, Photothermal microscopy: Imaging the optical absorption of single nanoparticles and single molecules. ACS Nano 14, 16414–16445 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    R. W. Taylor, R. G. Mahmoodabadi, V. Rauschenberger, A. Giessl, A. Schambony, V. Sandoghdar, Interferometric scattering microscopy reveals microsecond nanoscopic protein motion on a live cell membrane. Nat. Photonics 13, 480–487 (2019). 19

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Park, I.-B

    J.-S. Park, I.-B. Lee, S.-C. Hong, M. Cho, Label-free interference imaging of intracellular trafficking. Acc. Chem. Res. 57, 1565–1576 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Li, P.-T

    Q.-Y. Li, P.-T. Lyu, B. Kang, H.-Y. Chen, J.-J. Xu, Electrochemically modulated interferometric scattering microscopy for imaging ion channel activity in live cells. Nat. Photonics 19, 871–878 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    A. J. Merryweather, C. Schnedermann, Q. Jacquet, C. P. Grey, A. Rao, Operando optical tracking of single-particle ion dynamics in batteries. Nature 594, 522–528 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Delor, H

    M. Delor, H. L. Weaver, Q. Yu, N. S. Ginsberg, Imaging material functionality through three-dimensional nanoscale tracking of energy flow. Nat. Mater. 19, 56–62 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Lyu, Q.-Y

    P.-T. Lyu, Q.-Y. Li, P. Wu, C. Sun, B. Kang, H.-Y. Chen, J.-J. Xu, Decrypting material performance by wide-field femtosecond interferometric imaging of energy carrier evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 13928–13937 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    G. Ding, C. Liu, J. Yin, X. Teng, Y. Tan, H. He, H. Lin, L. Tian, J.-X. Cheng, Self- supervised elimination of non-independent noise in hyperspectral imaging. Newton 1, 100195 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Tsai, C.-L

    S.-F. Tsai, C.-L. Hsieh, Ultrasensitive bright-field microscope enables label-free single- protein detection. Opt. Lett. 50, 7520 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    M. T. Gole, M. T. Dronadula, N. R. Aluru, C. J. Murphy, Immunoglobulin adsorption and film formation on mechanically wrinkled and crumpled surfaces at submonolayer coverage. Nanoscale Adv. 5, 2085–2095 (2023)

    work page 2085

  32. [32]

    C. Ota, S. Noguchi, S. Nagatoishi, K. Tsumoto, Assessment of the protein–protein interactions in a highly concentrated antibody solution by using Raman spectroscopy. Pharm. Res. 33, 956–969 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Y. Tan, H. Lin, J.-X. Cheng, Profiling single cancer cell metabolism via high-content SRS imaging with chemical sparsity. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg6061 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    N. K. Howell, G. Arteaga, S. Nakai, E. C. Y. Li-Chan, Raman spectral analysis in the C−H stretching region of proteins and amino acids for investigation of hydrophobic interactions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47, 924–933 (1999)

    work page 1999

  35. [35]

    Alizadeh-Pasdar, S

    N. Alizadeh-Pasdar, S. Nakai, E. C. Y. Li-Chan, Principal component similarity analysis of Raman spectra to study the effects of pH, heating, and κ-carrageenan on whey protein structure. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 6042–6052 (2002)

    work page 2002

  36. [36]

    M. Ji, M. Arbel, L. Zhang, C. W. Freudiger, S. S. Hou, D. Lin, X. Yang, B. J. Bacskai, X. S. Xie, Label-free imaging of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease with stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat7715 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Q. Xia, Z. Guo, H. Zong, S. Seitz, C. Yurdakul, M. S. Ünlü, L. Wang, J. H. Connor, J.-X. Cheng, Single virus fingerprinting by widefield interferometric defocus-enhanced mid- infrared photothermal microscopy. Nat. Commun. 14, 6655 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Z. Guo, G. Chiesa, J. Yin, A. Sanford, S. Meier, A. S. Khalil, J. Cheng, Structural mapping of protein aggregates in live cells modeling Huntington’s disease. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202408163 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    R. Sun, Y. Zhuang, Y. Lin, F. Hu, In situ secondary structure imaging of protein phase separation and aggregation by hyperspectral stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Nat. Commun. 16, 8552 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    A. Rana, T. Nikam, B. Sreepathi, S. A. Saraf, S. Awasthi, The aggregation continuum of α- synuclein and its relevance to brain aging. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 16, 3634–3652 (2025). 20

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Winner, R

    B. Winner, R. Jappelli, S. K. Maji, P. A. Desplats, L. Boyer, S. Aigner, C. Hetzer, T. Loher, M. Vilar, S. Campioni, C. Tzitzilonis, A. Soragni, S. Jessberger, H. Mira, A. Consiglio, E. Pham, E. Masliah, F. H. Gage, R. Riek, In vivo demonstration that α-synuclein oligomers are toxic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 4194–4199 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    D. Emin, Y. P. Zhang, E. Lobanova, A. Miller, X. Li, Z. Xia, H. Dakin, D. I. Sideris, J. Y. L. Lam, R. T. Ranasinghe, A. Kouli, Y. Zhao, S. De, T. P. J. Knowles, M. Vendruscolo, F. S. Ruggeri, F. I. Aigbirhio, C. H. Williams-Gray, D. Klenerman, Small soluble α-synuclein aggregates are the toxic species in Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Commun. 13, 5512 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Fusco, S

    G. Fusco, S. W. Chen, P. T. F. Williamson, R. Cascella, M. Perni, J. A. Jarvis, C. Cecchi, M. Vendruscolo, F. Chiti, N. Cremades, L. Ying, C. M. Dobson, A. De Simone, Structural basis of membrane disruption and cellular toxicity by α-synuclein oligomers. Science 358, 1440–1443 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    S. W. Chen, S. Drakulic, E. Deas, M. Ouberai, F. A. Aprile, R. Arranz, S. Ness, C. Roodveldt, T. Guilliams, E. J. De-Genst, D. Klenerman, N. W. Wood, T. P. J. Knowles, C. Alfonso, G. Rivas, A. Y. Abramov, J. M. Valpuesta, C. M. Dobson, N. Cremades, Structural characterization of toxic oligomers that are kinetically trapped during α-synuclein fibril format...

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    N. C. Maiti, M. M. Apetri, M. G. Zagorski, P. R. Carey, V. E. Anderson, Raman spectroscopic characterization of secondary structure in natively unfolded proteins: α- Synuclein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 2399–2408 (2004)

    work page 2004

  46. [46]

    M. M. Apetri, N. C. Maiti, M. G. Zagorski, P. R. Carey, V. E. Anderson, Secondary structure of α-synuclein oligomers: Characterization by Raman and atomic force microscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 355, 63–71 (2006)

    work page 2006

  47. [47]

    H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, P. E. Bourne, The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000)

    work page 2000

  48. [48]

    Guo, H.-X

    J. Guo, H.-X. Zhou, Protein allostery and conformational dynamics. Chem. Rev. 116, 6503– 6515 (2016)

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Pillai, A

    A. Pillai, A. Idris, A. Philomin, C. Weidle, R. Skotheim, P. J. Y. Leung, A. Broerman, C. Demakis, A. J. Borst, F. Praetorius, D. Baker, De novo design of allosterically switchable protein assemblies. Nature 632, 911–920 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    M. S. Choy, Y. Li, L. E. S. F. Machado, M. B. A. Kunze, C. R. Connors, X. Wei, K. Lindorff-Larsen, R. Page, W. Peti, Conformational rigidity and protein dynamics at distinct timescales regulate PTP1B activity and allostery. Mol. Cell 65, 644-658.e5 (2017)

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    A. A. A. I. Ali, E. Dorbath, G. Stock, Allosteric communication mediated by protein contact clusters: A dynamical model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 10731–10739 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Castelli, F

    M. Castelli, F. Marchetti, S. Osuna, A. S. F. Oliveira, A. J. Mulholland, S. A. Serapian, G. Colombo, Decrypting allostery in membrane-bound K-Ras4B using complementary in silico approaches based on unbiased molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 901–919 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Zhang, Z

    M. Zhang, Z. Zheng, J. Zhou, Q. Ding, M. Long, S. Lü, Real-time structural signatures of protein allostery by electrically- and mechanically-coupled sensing. Nano Today 55, 102153 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    J.-H. Wang, D. J. Gessler, W. Zhan, T. L. Gallagher, G. Gao, Adeno-associated virus as a delivery vector for gene therapy of human diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 9, 78 (2024). 21

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Kontogiannis, J

    T. Kontogiannis, J. Braybrook, C. McElroy, C. Foy, A. S. Whale, M. Quaglia, C. M. Smales, Characterization of AAV vectors: A review of analytical techniques and critical quality attributes. Mol. Ther. - Methods Clin. Dev. 32, 101309 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    F.-K. Lu, S. Basu, V. Igras, M. P. Hoang, M. Ji, D. Fu, G. R. Holtom, V. A. Neel, C. W. Freudiger, D. E. Fisher, X. S. Xie, Label-free DNA imaging in vivo with stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 11624–11629 (2015)

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    H. Wang, D. Lee, Y. Cao, X. Bi, J. Du, K. Miao, L. Wei, Bond-selective fluorescence imaging with single-molecule sensitivity. Nat. Photonics 17, 846–855 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Stollmann, J

    A. Stollmann, J. Garcia-Guirado, J.-S. Hong, P. Rüedi, H. Im, H. Lee, J. Ortega Arroyo, R. Quidant, Molecular fingerprinting of biological nanoparticles with a label-free optofluidic platform. Nat. Commun. 15, 4109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Zirkelbach, B

    J. Zirkelbach, B. Gurlek, M. Mirzaei, A. Shkarin, T. Utikal, S. Götzinger, V. Sandoghdar, Spectral splitting of a stimulated Raman transition in a single molecule. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043244 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Mizushima, Y

    K. Mizushima, Y. Kumamoto, S. Tamura, M. Yamanaka, K. Mochizuki, M. Li, S. Egoshi, K. Dodo, Y. Harada, N. I. Smith, M. Sodeoka, H. Tanaka, K. Fujita, Raman microscopy of cryofixed biological specimens for high-resolution and high-sensitivity chemical imaging. Sci. Adv. (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Y. Wang, S. Adhikari, H. Van Der Meer, J. Liu, M. Orrit, Thousand-fold enhancement of photothermal signals in near-critical CO

    work page

  62. [62]

    J. Phys. Chem. C 127, 3619–3625 (2023)

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    Küppers, D

    M. Küppers, D. Albrecht, A. D. Kashkanova, J. Lühr, V. Sandoghdar, Confocal interferometric scattering microscopy reveals 3D nanoscopic structure and dynamics in live cells. Nat. Commun. 14, 1962 (2023)

    work page 1962

  64. [64]

    Y. Li, C. Zhao, F. Luo, Z. Liu, X. Gui, Z. Luo, X. Zhang, D. Li, C. Liu, X. Li, Amyloid fibril structure of α-synuclein determined by cryo-electron microscopy. Cell Res. 28, 897– 903 (2018)

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    Cascella, M

    R. Cascella, M. Perni, S. W. Chen, G. Fusco, C. Cecchi, M. Vendruscolo, F. Chiti, C. M. Dobson, A. De Simone, Probing the origin of the toxicity of oligomeric aggregates of α- synuclein with antibodies. ACS Chem. Biol. 14, 1352–1362 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    Tinevez, N

    J.-Y. Tinevez, N. Perry, J. Schindelin, G. M. Hoopes, G. D. Reynolds, E. Laplantine, S. Y. Bednarek, S. L. Shorte, K. W. Eliceiri, TrackMate: An open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking. Methods 115, 80–90 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    A. A. Al Balushi, R. Gordon, A label-free untethered approach to single-molecule protein binding kinetics. Nano Lett. 14, 5787–5791 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    Loeff, J

    L. Loeff, J. W. J. Kerssemakers, C. Joo, C. Dekker, AutoStepfinder: A fast and automated step detection method for single-molecule analysis. Patterns 2, 100256 (2021)

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    W. Min, X. Gao, Absolute signal of stimulated Raman scattering microscopy: A quantum electrodynamics treatment. Sci. Adv. 10, eadm8424 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    H. Zong, C. Yurdakul, Y. Bai, M. Zhang, M. S. Ünlü, J.-X. Cheng, Background-suppressed high-throughput mid-infrared photothermal microscopy via pupil engineering. ACS Photonics 8, 3323–3336 (2021)

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    N. S. Ginsberg, C.-L. Hsieh, P. Kukura, M. Piliarik, V. Sandoghdar, Interferometric scattering microscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods Primer 5, 23 (2025). 22 Acknowledgments: Funding: This work was supported by NIH R35GM136223 and R01EB035429 to J.-X.C.; Breakthrough Fund Ligases Program to X.W.; the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (D.B.). AFM imaging was performe...

    work page 2025