pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.00096 · v1 · pith:PF3BBVLCnew · submitted 2026-03-31 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.SR

Revealing the stellar population of the ultra-obscured Galactic globular cluster Glimpse-C02

M. Loriga , M. Cadelano , C. Pallanca , F. R. Ferraro , B. Lanzoni , L. Chiappino , C. Crociati , E. Dalessandro
show 5 more authors
C. Giusti S. Leanza D. Massari L. Origlia E. Vesperini
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 09:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords globular clusterGlimpse-C02differential reddeningisochrone fittingcolor-magnitude diagramstellar populationGalactic bulgedynamical evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Isochrone fitting after differential reddening correction shows Glimpse-C02 is an old, metal-rich globular cluster about 6.3 kpc from the Sun.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes deep photometry of the highly reddened globular cluster Glimpse-C02 to build a color-magnitude diagram that reaches the main-sequence turnoff for the first time. A map of differential reddening is constructed to correct the diagram, after which standard isochrones are fitted to extract the cluster's color excess, distance, metallicity, age, and total mass. These parameters place the cluster in the inner Galaxy, possibly as a bulge member, and indicate it has reached an advanced stage of dynamical evolution with a high central concentration.

Core claim

From isochrone-fitting of the differential reddening corrected color-magnitude diagram, we derived a mean color excess E(B-V)=6.33^{+0.05}_{-0.04}, distance d=6.3^{+0.8}_{-0.3} kpc, [Fe/H]=-0.30^{+0.10}_{-0.08}, age t=11.9^{+0.7}_{-0.6} Gyr, and mass M=3.57^{+0.22}_{-0.19}×10^4 M_⊙, classifying Glimpse-C02 as an old and metal-rich globular cluster in an advanced stage of dynamical evolution.

What carries the argument

Differential reddening map combined with isochrone fitting to the main-sequence turnoff in the corrected color-magnitude diagram.

If this is right

  • The derived distance places the cluster closer to the Galactic center than earlier estimates, consistent with a bulge globular cluster.
  • The high King concentration parameter of 1.97 indicates the cluster is dynamically evolved with a compact core.
  • The absolute age of 11.9 Gyr matches the typical value for metal-rich Galactic globular clusters.
  • The mass of 3.57×10^4 solar masses follows directly from the integrated H-band luminosity and places the object among lower-mass globular clusters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar differential-reddening corrections could be applied to other ultra-obscured inner-Galaxy clusters to test whether they share the same old, metal-rich population.
  • The parameters supply a new anchor point for models of globular-cluster disruption and mass loss in the strong tidal field near the bulge.
  • If the distance holds, kinematic follow-up could check whether the cluster shares the rotation or velocity dispersion of known bulge globular clusters.

Load-bearing premise

Standard stellar evolution models at the fitted metallicity accurately reproduce the observed main-sequence turnoff and the differential reddening map removes all systematic color shifts without residual biases.

What would settle it

An independent spectroscopic metallicity or a trigonometric parallax distance that lies well outside the reported uncertainties would show the isochrone solution is incorrect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.00096 by B. Lanzoni, C. Crociati, C. Giusti, C. Pallanca, D. Massari, E. Dalessandro, E. Vesperini, F. R. Ferraro, L. Chiappino, L. Origlia, M. Cadelano, M. Loriga, S. Leanza.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A WFC3/IR image centered on Glimpse-C02 obtained in the F160W filter, with an exposure time of 199 s. North is up, East is to the left. stellar system (proposal GO 17918, P.I. Loriga). It is composed of high-resolution images obtained from the IR channel of the WFC3/HST. This instrument provides ∼0.13 arcsec/pixel spatial resolution in a nominal 136 × 123 arcsec2 field of view (FoV). The data were acquired… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left panel: (mF160W, mF110W − mF160W) observed CMD of Glimpse-C02 after the cleaning procedure using roundness, sharp￾ness and chi parameters, with the reddening vector shown as a red arrow. Central panel: (mF160W, mF110W − mF160W) observed CMD of Glimpse-C02 after the same cleaning procedure and by considering a radius of 45′′ from the center, as determined in Sec. 6. Right panel: (Ks ,J − Ks) CMD for dis… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Differential reddening map relative to the cluster cen￾ter position (black cross; see Sec.6). North is up, East is to the left. Darker colors correspond to more extincted regions, as de￾tailed in the side color bar that reports the differential color ex￾cess δ(B − V). north-west part of the map. A small dark blob can also be noticed on the north with respect to the center of the cluster (black cross; see S… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (mF160W, mF110W − mF160W) CMD before the correction for differential reddening (left panel), after the correction for differ￾ential reddening (central panel), and after the correction for differential reddening by considering only the stars within 45′′ from the center, as defined in Sec.6 (right panel). The reddening vector is represented in the left panel as a red arrow. The red crosses in the right panel… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left panel: superposition of the (MF160W, MF110W − MF160W) CMD of Glimpse-C02 (red dots) with the (MF160W, MF110W − MF160W) CMD of NGC 6440 (black dots) in the abso￾lute plane. The parameters used for each GC are labeled. Right panel: (MF160W, MF110W − MF160W) CMD of Glimpse-C02 in the absolute plane with the MRL of NGC 6440 (blue line) and Glimpse C02 (red line) superposed. 6. Determination of the structu… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Differential reddening corrected (mF110W, mF110W − mF160W), (mF160W, mF110W − mF160W) CMDs of stars within 25′′ from the cluster center and with over-plotted the BASTI isochrone (red line) that best reproduces the evolutionary sequences of Glimpse-C02. The orange shaded region represents the 1σ uncertainty region of the best-fit isochrone. Right: Corner plot with the one- and two-dimensional projecti… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Projected density profile of Glimpse-C02 derived from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present the results of a detailed photometric analysis of Glimpse-C02, one of the most extincted globular clusters of the Milky Way. We built a deep color magnitude diagram spanning $\approx$ 10 magnitudes, enabling the first identification of the cluster's main sequence turnoff. Due to the extreme reddening affecting the region, a differential reddening correction was necessary. The resulting reddening map reveals variations up to $\delta E(B-V) \approx 2.5$ mag. From isochrone-fitting of the differential reddening corrected color-magnitude diagram, we derived a mean color excess $E(B-V)=6.33^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$, and a distance modulus $(m-M)_0=14.00^{+0.26}_{-0.11}$, corresponding to a distance of $d=6.3^{+0.8}_{-0.3}$ kpc from the Sun, and a Galactocentric distance of $2.6^{+0.6}_{-0.7}$ kpc. This distance value, within the associated uncertainties, suggests that the cluster may be located closer to the Galactic Center compared to previous estimates, possibly supporting its classification as a bulge globular cluster. We obtained a photometric metallicity estimate of [Fe/H]$=-0.30^{+0.10}_{-0.08}$ and the first absolute age determination for Glimpse-C02, resulting in $t=11.9^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ Gyr, as typically measured for Galactic globular clusters at this metallicity. We also derived a new estimate of the center of gravity of the cluster and determined its projected density profile from resolved star counts, finding a high King concentration parameter ($c = 1.97_{-0.67}^{+0.51}$) and a core radius $r_c =8.72^{+0.40}_{-0.35}$ arcsec. Finally, from the surface brightness profile of the system, we derived an integrated $H$-band magnitude $M_{\rm H}=-7.9$, corresponding to a mass of $M=3.57^{+0.22}_{-0.19}\times 10^4 M_{\odot}$. Thus, our work classifies Glimpse-C02 as an old and metal-rich globular cluster that is in an advanced stage of its dynamical evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a photometric analysis of the highly reddened globular cluster Glimpse-C02. A deep CMD spanning ~10 magnitudes is constructed, a differential reddening correction is applied (revealing variations up to δE(B-V)≈2.5 mag), and isochrone fitting yields E(B-V)=6.33^{+0.05}_{-0.04}, distance d=6.3^{+0.8}_{-0.3} kpc, [Fe/H]=-0.30^{+0.10}_{-0.08}, age t=11.9^{+0.7}_{-0.6} Gyr, and mass M=3.57^{+0.22}_{-0.19}×10^4 M_⊙. The cluster is classified as old and metal-rich in an advanced stage of dynamical evolution based on a King-model fit with concentration c=1.97 and core radius r_c=8.72 arcsec.

Significance. If robust, the results provide the first absolute age and refined distance for this ultra-obscured cluster, supporting its possible classification as a bulge globular cluster and contributing to the census of highly extincted Milky Way GCs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / isochrone fitting] Abstract and isochrone-fitting description: The central age, distance, and metallicity are obtained by fitting standard isochrones to the differential-reddening-corrected CMD. However, with reddening variations reaching δE(B-V)≈2.5 mag, no quantitative test of residual color biases (e.g., sub-region MSTO consistency or post-correction color dispersion) is reported; such residuals would directly shift the turnoff and propagate into the fitted parameters.
  2. [Projected density profile] Density profile and King-model section: The high concentration parameter c=1.97^{+0.51}_{-0.67} is used to classify the cluster as dynamically evolved, but the large uncertainties and lack of reported fit statistics (e.g., residuals or comparison to other GCs) make the classification qualitative rather than quantitative.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The distance modulus (m-M)_0=14.00 is given with asymmetric errors; explicitly state the adopted extinction law and solar Galactocentric distance used to derive the Galactocentric radius of 2.6 kpc.
  2. [Abstract] Clarify whether alternative isochrone grids or reddening laws were tested, as the abstract provides no such comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will implement to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / isochrone fitting] Abstract and isochrone-fitting description: The central age, distance, and metallicity are obtained by fitting standard isochrones to the differential-reddening-corrected CMD. However, with reddening variations reaching δE(B-V)≈2.5 mag, no quantitative test of residual color biases (e.g., sub-region MSTO consistency or post-correction color dispersion) is reported; such residuals would directly shift the turnoff and propagate into the fitted parameters.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative validation of the differential reddening correction is warranted given the large variations (δE(B-V)≈2.5 mag). The original analysis applied a standard spatial binning and median-color correction method, and the resulting CMD shows a well-defined main-sequence turnoff, but we did not report formal tests of residual biases. In the revised manuscript we will add these checks, including a comparison of main-sequence turnoff loci in independent spatial sub-regions and the measured reduction in color dispersion after correction, together with an assessment of how any remaining scatter propagates into the isochrone-derived parameters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Projected density profile] Density profile and King-model section: The high concentration parameter c=1.97^{+0.51}_{-0.67} is used to classify the cluster as dynamically evolved, but the large uncertainties and lack of reported fit statistics (e.g., residuals or comparison to other GCs) make the classification qualitative rather than quantitative.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the dynamical-evolution classification would be more robust with additional quantitative support. The reported concentration carries large uncertainties, as already noted in the text. In the revision we will include the goodness-of-fit metrics for the King-model fit (e.g., residuals and reduced χ²) and will add a brief comparison of the derived concentration parameter to the distribution of concentrations for other Galactic globular clusters of comparable mass and metallicity to place the result on a firmer quantitative footing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper applies a differential reddening correction to the observed CMD as a preprocessing step, then performs isochrone fitting using external stellar evolution models to derive E(B-V), distance, [Fe/H], age, and mass. These parameters are not defined in terms of themselves, nor are fitted inputs renamed as predictions. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation are present in the central claims. The derivation rests on independent model libraries and is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central results rest on fitting several parameters to external isochrone libraries and a reddening map constructed from the same photometry; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • E(B-V) = 6.33
    Mean color excess adjusted to align isochrones with the observed CMD.
  • distance modulus = 14.00
    Adjusted during isochrone fitting to match the observed turnoff and giant branch.
  • age = 11.9 Gyr
    Fitted to reproduce the main-sequence turnoff location after reddening correction.
  • metallicity = -0.30
    Photometric value chosen to best match the CMD morphology.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard stellar isochrone models at the derived metallicity accurately describe the cluster's stellar population.
    Invoked when performing the isochrone fit to the differential-reddening-corrected CMD.
  • domain assumption The differential reddening map derived from the photometry correctly captures spatial variations without introducing systematic color offsets.
    Required to construct the corrected CMD used for all subsequent parameter fits.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6045 in / 1637 out tokens · 62978 ms · 2026-05-21T09:45:43.155827+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2025, A&A, 704, A255 Alvarez Garay, D

    Aguado-Agelet, F., Massari, D., Monelli, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A255 Alvarez Garay, D. A., Fanelli, C., Origlia, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A198

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    2023, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 670

    Beccari, G., Cadelano, M., & Dalessandro, E. 2023, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 670

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    A., Churchwell, E., Babler, B

    Benjamin, R. A., Churchwell, E., Babler, B. L., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 953

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    N., Ramírez Alegría, S., et al

    Borissova, J., Chené, A. N., Ramírez Alegría, S., et al. 2014, A&A, 569, A24

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    R., Dalessandro, E., et al

    Cadelano, M., Ferraro, F. R., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2022, Astrophysical Journal, 941

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    2023, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 679

    Cadelano, M., Pallanca, C., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2023, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 679

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    2020, ApJ, 895, 54

    Cadelano, M., Saracino, S., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 54

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    2018, ApJ, 860, L27

    Camargo, D. 2018, ApJ, 860, L27

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    & Minniti, D

    Camargo, D. & Minniti, D. 2019, MNRAS, 484, L90

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245

    work page 1989

  11. [11]

    2009, A&A, 508, 695

    Carretta, E., Bragaglia, A., Gratton, R., D’Orazi, V ., & Lucatello, S. 2009, A&A, 508, 695

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    2025, A&A, 704, A256

    Ceccarelli, E., Massari, D., Aguado-Agelet, F., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A256

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    2024, A&A, 691, A311

    Crociati, C., Cignoni, M., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A311

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    R., et al

    Crociati, C., Valenti, E., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 17

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    2022, ApJ, 940, 170

    Dalessandro, E., Crociati, C., Cignoni, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 170

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    2019, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 621

    Dalessandro, E., Ferraro, F., Bastian, N., et al. 2019, Astronomy and Astro- physics, 621

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    R., et al

    Dalessandro, E., Lanzoni, B., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2008, ApJ, 677, 1069

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    R., Lanzoni, B., & Pallanca, C

    Deras, D., Cadelano, M., Ferraro, F. R., Lanzoni, B., & Pallanca, C. 2023, ApJ, 942, 104

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    2024, A&A, 681, A38

    Deras, D., Cadelano, M., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A38

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    2022, A&A, 657, A67

    Dias, B., Palma, T., Minniti, D., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, A67

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    2016, DOLPHOT: Stellar photometry, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1608.013

    Dolphin, A. 2016, DOLPHOT: Stellar photometry, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1608.013

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Dolphin, A. E. 2000, PASP, 112, 1383 Article number, page 8 of 9 M. Loriga et al.: Revealing the stellar population of the ultra-obscured Galactic globular cluster Glimpse-C02

    work page 2000

  23. [23]

    2010, ApJ, 708, 698

    Dotter, A., Sarajedini, A., Anderson, J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, 698

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    2024, A&A, 688, A154

    Fanelli, C., Origlia, L., Mucciarelli, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A154

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    R., Chiappino, L., Bartolomei, A., et al

    Ferraro, F. R., Chiappino, L., Bartolomei, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A179

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    R., Dalessandro, E., Mucciarelli, A., et al

    Ferraro, F. R., Dalessandro, E., Mucciarelli, A., et al. 2009, Nature, 462, 483

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    R., Massari, D., Dalessandro, E., et al

    Ferraro, F. R., Massari, D., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, 75

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    R., Mucciarelli, A., Lanzoni, B., et al

    Ferraro, F. R., Mucciarelli, A., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2023, Nature Communications, 14, 2584

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    R., Pallanca, C., Lanzoni, B., et al

    Ferraro, F. R., Pallanca, C., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 311

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Bulge Fossil Fragments as a new population of factories of gravitational wave sources in the Galaxy

    Ferraro, F. R., Vesperini, E., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.25127

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63

    work page 1999

  32. [32]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. & Massa, D. 1990, ApJS, 72, 163

    work page 1990

  33. [33]

    2013, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1303.002

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Conley, A., Meierjurgen Farr, W., et al. 2013, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1303.002

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    M., Sinha, M., et al

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Farr, W. M., Sinha, M., et al. 2019, emcee v3: A Python ensemble sampling toolkit for affine-invariant MCMC

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    2007, MNRAS, 377, L54 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A

    Froebrich, D., Meusinger, H., & Scholz, A. 2007, MNRAS, 377, L54 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1

    work page 2007

  36. [36]

    R., Minniti, D., Gómez, M., et al

    Garro, E. R., Minniti, D., Gómez, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, L19

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    R., Minniti, D., Gómez, M., et al

    Garro, E. R., Minniti, D., Gómez, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A86

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    R., Minniti, D., Gómez, M., et al

    Garro, E. R., Minniti, D., Gómez, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A120

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    R., et al

    Giusti, C., Cadelano, M., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2023, Astrophysical Journal, 953

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    R., et al

    Giusti, C., Cadelano, M., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, 143

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    R., et al

    Giusti, C., Cadelano, M., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 687

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Harris, W. E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487

    work page 1996

  43. [43]

    L., Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., et al

    Hidalgo, S. L., Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 125

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    2026, AJ, 171, 137

    Hughes, J., Kunder, A., Covey, K., et al. 2026, AJ, 171, 137

    work page 2026

  45. [45]

    A., Pilachowski, C

    Kader, J. A., Pilachowski, C. A., Johnson, C. I., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 76

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    A., Pilachowski, C

    Kader, J. A., Pilachowski, C. A., Johnson, C. I., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 126

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 5591

    Kamann, S., Husser, T.-O., Dreizler, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 5591

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    R., et al

    Kunder, A., Prudil, Z., Covey, K. R., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 21

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    D., Borissova, J., & Ortolani, S

    Kurtev, R., Ivanov, V . D., Borissova, J., & Ortolani, S. 2008, A&A, 489, 583

    work page 2008

  50. [50]

    R., Dalessandro, E., et al

    Lanzoni, B., Ferraro, F. R., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 717, 653

    work page 2010

  51. [51]

    2022, ApJ, 934, 150

    Libralato, M., Bellini, A., Vesperini, E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 934, 150

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    2025, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 695

    Loriga, M., Pallanca, C., Ferraro, F., et al. 2025, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 695

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    2005, MNRAS, 362, 799

    Maraston, C. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 799

    work page 2005

  54. [54]

    & Thomas, D

    Maraston, C. & Thomas, D. 2000, ApJ, 541, 126 Marín-Franch, A., Aparicio, A., Piotto, G., et al. 2009, ApJ, 694, 1498

    work page 2000

  55. [55]

    2023, A&A, 680, A20

    Massari, D., Aguado-Agelet, F., Monelli, M., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, A20

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    H., & Helmi, A

    Massari, D., Koppelman, H. H., & Helmi, A. 2019, A&A, 630, L4

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    R., et al

    Massari, D., Mucciarelli, A., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 22

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    P., Clemens, D

    Mercer, E. P., Clemens, D. P., Meade, M. R., et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, 560

    work page 2005

  59. [59]

    2016, in Galactic Surveys: New Results on Formation, Evolution, Structure and Chemical Evolution of the Milky Way, 10

    Minniti, D. 2016, in Galactic Surveys: New Results on Formation, Evolution, Structure and Chemical Evolution of the Milky Way, 10

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    W., Emerson, J

    Minniti, D., Lucas, P. W., Emerson, J. P., et al. 2010, New A, 15, 433

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    2017, ApJ, 838, L14

    Minniti, D., Palma, T., Dékány, I., et al. 2017, ApJ, 838, L14

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    R., et al

    Miocchi, P., Lanzoni, B., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 151

    work page 2013

  63. [63]

    R., Fusi Pecci, F., & Origlia, L

    Montegriffo, P., Ferraro, F. R., Fusi Pecci, F., & Origlia, L. 1995, MNRAS, 276, 739

    work page 1995

  64. [64]

    2021, A&A, 654, A39 O’Donnell, J

    Obasi, C., Gómez, M., Minniti, D., & Alonso-García, J. 2021, A&A, 654, A39 O’Donnell, J. E. 1994, ApJ, 422, 158

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    R., Fanelli, C., et al

    Origlia, L., Ferraro, F. R., Fanelli, C., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A19

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    R., Fusi Pecci, F., & Oliva, E

    Origlia, L., Ferraro, F. R., Fusi Pecci, F., & Oliva, E. 1997, A&A, 321, 859

    work page 1997

  67. [67]

    M., et al

    Origlia, L., Massari, D., Rich, R. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, L5

    work page 2013

  68. [68]

    2019, ApJ, 871, 114

    Origlia, L., Mucciarelli, A., Fiorentino, G., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 114

    work page 2019

  69. [69]

    M., Ferraro, F

    Origlia, L., Rich, R. M., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2011, ApJ, 726, L20

    work page 2011

  70. [70]

    Origlia, L., Valenti, E., & Rich, R. M. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 1419

    work page 2008

  71. [71]

    R., Lanzoni, B., et al

    Pallanca, C., Ferraro, F. R., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 159

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 3140

    Palma, T., Minniti, D., Alonso-García, J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 3140

    work page 2019

  73. [73]

    2021, ApJ, 908, 102

    Pietrinferni, A., Hidalgo, S., Cassisi, S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 102

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 2065

    Pietrinferni, A., Salaris, M., Cassisi, S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 2065

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    2020, ApJ, 895, 15

    Raso, S., Libralato, M., Bellini, A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 15

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    2026, A&A, 707, A258

    Rosignoli, L., Libralato, M., Pascale, R., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A258

    work page 2026

  77. [77]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163

    work page 2006

  78. [78]

    & Hart, M

    Spitzer, Jr., L. & Hart, M. H. 1971, ApJ, 164, 399

    work page 1971

  79. [79]

    L., Jimenez, R., Verde, L., & Wandelt, B

    Valcin, D., Bernal, J. L., Jimenez, R., Verde, L., & Wandelt, B. D. 2020, J. Cos- mology Astropart. Phys., 2020, 002

    work page 2020

  80. [80]

    R., & Origlia, L

    Valenti, E., Ferraro, F. R., & Origlia, L. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1729

    work page 2010

Showing first 80 references.