pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.25127 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.SR

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Bulge Fossil Fragments as a new population of factories of gravitational wave sources in the Galaxy

F. R. Ferraro , E. Vesperini , B. Lanzoni , D. Romano , L. Origlia , C. Pallanca , C. Fanelli , F. Calura
show 4 more authors
E. Dalessandro D. Massari G. Zullo M. Cadelano
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords Bulge Fossil FragmentsTerzan 5binary black hole mergersgravitational wave sourcesGalactic bulgeself-enrichment scenarioglobular cluster scaling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bulge Fossil Fragments like Terzan 5 can generate hundreds of binary black hole mergers, 15-250 times more than a typical globular cluster.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that Bulge Fossil Fragments, such as Terzan 5, are remnants of primordial massive structures that formed the Galactic bulge by retaining supernova ejecta. It applies a chemical evolutionary model of Terzan 5 and a scaling relation from globular clusters to estimate the number of binary black hole mergers. The calculation yields several hundred mergers per system, far exceeding typical globular clusters. This matters for identifying previously overlooked sources of gravitational waves in the Milky Way. A sympathetic reader would see it as connecting the chemical history of the bulge to modern gravitational wave detections.

Core claim

By adopting Terzan 5 as prototype of BFF, using its chemical evolutionary model, and following a scaling relation derived for globular clusters, several hundreds of binary BH mergers are expected in this stellar system. This number is between 15 and 250 times larger than that produced by a typical globular cluster. Hence, BFFs are identified as a new population of stellar systems potentially able to produce a significant number of gravitational wave emitters.

What carries the argument

Scaling relation for binary black hole mergers from globular clusters, applied to the chemical evolutionary model of Terzan 5 as a Bulge Fossil Fragment.

If this is right

  • Several hundreds of binary BH mergers are expected from each BFF.
  • The number is 15 to 250 times larger than from a typical globular cluster.
  • BFFs have not been considered in previous investigations of gravitational wave sources.
  • They could form BHs with masses above 60 solar masses and intermediate-mass BHs via repeated dynamical interactions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Observations of gravitational waves from the direction of the Galactic bulge could test this prediction.
  • If BFFs are common in the bulge, they may account for a larger fraction of detected mergers than previously modeled.
  • Similar systems in other galaxies might contribute to extragalactic gravitational wave backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

The scaling relation for merger rates in globular clusters applies directly to Bulge Fossil Fragments given their initial conditions and self-enrichment.

What would settle it

A detailed N-body simulation or observational census of black hole binaries in Terzan 5 showing fewer than several hundred mergers over its lifetime would challenge the estimate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.25127 by B. Lanzoni, C. Fanelli, C. Pallanca, D. Massari, D. Romano, E. Dalessandro, E. Vesperini, F. Calura, F. R. Ferraro, G. Zullo, L. Origlia, M. Cadelano.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top panel: Observed iron distribution of Terzan 5 (gray his￾togram, from Massari et al. 2014) compared to the prediction of model S02s by Romano et al. (2023, orange shaded region). Bottom panel: [α/Fe]-[Fe/H] abundance pattern observed in Terzan 5 (gray circles, from Origlia et al. 2011, 2013, 2025) compared to the prediction of model S02s presented in Romano et al. (2023, orange shaded region). In both p… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Number of BHs (top panel) and NSs (bottom panel) present within the potential well of Terzan 5 during its evolutionary history, as predicted by model S02s of Romano et al. (2023). The two main star formation bursts that characterize the enrichment history of the system (at an age of ∼ 12 and 4.5 Gyr) are marked with two vertical gray shaded strips. and an extrapolation at high mass of the analytical expres… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Contour plot of the number of BBH mergers (blue solid lines and associated labels) in the two planes summarizing the effects of the main parameter dependence: initial half-mass radius versus initial stellar mass (by assuming a primordial binary fraction of 10%; left panel), and primordial binary fraction versus average initial density within rh (by assuming an initial stellar mass of 3 × 106M⊙; right panel… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Number of BBH mergers as a function of the system initial stel￾lar mass from eq. (1), assuming the half-mass radius-mass relationship from Larsen (2004, solid line) and that from Marks & Kroupa (2012, red dashed line). The purple shaded area marks the range of possible initial masses for proto-Terzan 5 systems. 4. Discussion and conclusions The chemical evolutionary history together with the recon￾structed… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The discovery of the complex stellar populations hosted in two massive stellar systems in the Galactic bulge, namely Terzan5 and Liller 1, posed intriguing questions about their origin. Despite their globular cluster appearance, they host sub-populations with significantly different ages (several Gyrs) and metallicities (about 1 dex) tracing a chemical abundance pattern that is consistent only with that observed in the bulge. These surprising properties can be naturally explained in the context of a self-enrichment scenario, opening the possibility that they could be the remnants of primordial massive structures that contributed to the bulge formation (the so-called Bulge Fossil Fragments, BFFs) capable of retaining supernova ejecta within their potential well. In this paper we present a first attempt to quantify the expected contribution of BFFs to the gravitational wave emission. In particular, by adopting Terzan5 as prototype of BFF, using its chemical evolutionary model, and following a scaling relation derived for globular clusters, we present a first-guess estimate of the number of binary black hole (BH) mergers expected in this stellar system. Within the adopted simplifying assumptions and the uncertainties about the initial conditions of the proto-Terzan 5 system, we find that several hundreds of binary BH mergers are expected, a number that is between 15 and 250 times larger than that produced by a typical globular cluster. Hence, this study identifies in the BFF family a new population of stellar systems potentially able to produce a significant number of gravitational wave emitters, that has not been considered in any previous investigation. Moreover we speculate that they could also be the natural place where BHs with masses above 60 Msun and even intermediate-mass BHs can form via repeated dynamical interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that Bulge Fossil Fragments (BFFs), prototyped by Terzan 5, are remnants of massive primordial structures capable of retaining supernova ejecta and acting as efficient factories for binary black hole mergers. By combining Terzan 5's chemical-evolution track with a merger-rate scaling relation previously derived for globular clusters, the authors estimate several hundred BBH mergers per BFF—15 to 250 times the yield of a typical GC—while speculating that repeated dynamical interactions in these systems could also produce BHs above 60 M⊙ and intermediate-mass BHs.

Significance. If the scaling extrapolation holds, the work identifies a previously overlooked Galactic population whose contribution to the BBH merger rate could be substantial, with direct implications for LIGO/Virgo event-rate forecasts from the bulge and for channels producing high-mass BHs. The paper supplies a first quantitative estimate grounded in an existing self-enrichment model, which is a constructive starting point even though the result remains preliminary.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and scaling-relation paragraph] The headline multiplier (15–250× a typical GC) and the absolute number of several hundred mergers rest entirely on applying a scaling relation calibrated for ordinary globular clusters to BFFs whose initial mass (~10^7 M⊙) and potential well are required to be deeper in order to retain SN ejecta. No independent dynamical calculation or retention-fraction estimate for this mass regime is provided, making the extrapolation load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Numerical estimate section] The manuscript acknowledges uncertainties in the proto-Terzan 5 initial conditions yet presents the merger count as a point estimate without error bars, sensitivity tests, or variation over plausible ranges of concentration, metallicity, or binary fraction. This omission directly affects the robustness of the 15–250× range.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and main text should explicitly cite the globular-cluster scaling relation (paper, equation, or table) being adopted so readers can assess its applicability.
  2. [Results paragraph] Clarify whether the quoted range 15–250 arises from a formal propagation of initial-condition uncertainties or from an ad-hoc envelope; a short table or figure showing the dependence would improve transparency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We agree that the extrapolation of the scaling relation and the presentation of numerical uncertainties require strengthening to improve the robustness of the claims. We will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and scaling-relation paragraph] The headline multiplier (15–250× a typical GC) and the absolute number of several hundred mergers rest entirely on applying a scaling relation calibrated for ordinary globular clusters to BFFs whose initial mass (~10^7 M⊙) and potential well are required to be deeper in order to retain SN ejecta. No independent dynamical calculation or retention-fraction estimate for this mass regime is provided, making the extrapolation load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the quantitative results depend on extrapolating a scaling relation calibrated on globular clusters to the higher-mass BFF regime. The relation is based on dynamical processes that scale with initial mass and central density, both of which are larger for BFFs, providing a physical motivation for expecting higher merger yields. However, we agree that this extrapolation is load-bearing and lacks direct verification for systems with deeper potential wells. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit discussion of the assumptions underlying the scaling, note the absence of dedicated retention-fraction calculations for this mass range, and qualify the 15–250× multiplier as a first-guess estimate that awaits confirmation by future N-body work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical estimate section] The manuscript acknowledges uncertainties in the proto-Terzan 5 initial conditions yet presents the merger count as a point estimate without error bars, sensitivity tests, or variation over plausible ranges of concentration, metallicity, or binary fraction. This omission directly affects the robustness of the 15–250× range.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. Although uncertainties in the initial conditions are mentioned, they are not quantified. In the revision we will perform and report sensitivity tests by varying initial mass, concentration, metallicity, and binary fraction over ranges consistent with the chemical-evolution model and Terzan 5 constraints. The merger numbers will be presented with ranges or error bars, and the origin of the 15–250× multiplier will be traced explicitly to these parameter variations rather than presented as a single point estimate. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • No independent dynamical calculation or retention-fraction estimate for the BFF mass regime can be provided, as this would require new high-resolution simulations beyond the scope of the present study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; estimate applies external GC scaling to BFF prototype

full rationale

The paper adopts Terzan 5 as BFF prototype, uses its chemical evolutionary model, and applies a pre-existing scaling relation derived for globular clusters to estimate BBH merger numbers (yielding hundreds, or 15-250x a typical GC). This is an extrapolation resting on the assumption that GC-derived scalings hold for higher-mass, self-enriched BFFs, but the scaling itself is not derived, fitted, or reduced within this paper. No self-definitional steps, no fitted-input-called-prediction, no load-bearing self-citation chains, and no equations showing the output equivalent to inputs by construction. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks; concerns about extrapolation belong to correctness risk, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The estimate depends on a chemical evolutionary model for Terzan 5, a scaling relation taken from globular clusters, and assumptions about initial mass and supernova retention in proto-BFFs.

free parameters (1)
  • BFF-to-GC merger scaling factor
    The factor of 15-250 is taken from a scaling relation derived for globular clusters and applied without new calibration to BFFs.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption BFFs follow the same dynamical scaling for black hole binary formation as globular clusters
    Invoked when the globular cluster scaling relation is applied to Terzan 5 as prototype.
invented entities (1)
  • Bulge Fossil Fragments no independent evidence
    purpose: Primordial massive structures that contributed to bulge formation and retained supernova ejecta
    Introduced to explain the multi-age, multi-metallicity populations in Terzan 5 and Liller 1.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5676 in / 1383 out tokens · 32554 ms · 2026-05-15T00:48:10.065031+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The multi-age stellar populations of Terzan 5 as revealed by JWST

    astro-ph.GA 2026-03 accept novelty 7.0

    JWST observations of Terzan 5 reveal multiple stellar populations with ages of 12.5 and 4.7 Gyr, plus hints of a 3.8 Gyr component, suggesting a multi-epoch formation history.

  2. The Bulge Cluster Origin (BulCO) survey with CRIRES at the ESO-VLT: a chemical screening of the Globular Cluster NGC 6553

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    NGC 6553 is a metal-rich globular cluster that formed in situ in the Galactic bulge, shown by its abundance patterns, multiple populations, and chemical DNA tests.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 061102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, L13. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2020, ApJ, 892, L3. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5 Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S.,...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  2. [2]

    2009, ApJ, 694, L158

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3081 Bournaud, F., & Elmegreen, B.G. 2009, ApJ, 694, L158. doi:10.1088/0004- 637X/694/2/L158 Bournaud, F., 2016, Discs in galaxies (Discs 2016),

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3081 2009

  3. [3]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.163061 Brown, G., Gnedin, O.Y ., & Li, H., 2018, ApJ, 864,

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.163061 2018

  4. [4]

    V., & Pitjev, N

    doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/aad595 Cadelano, M., Ransom, S. M., Freire, P. C. C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 855,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538- 2018

  5. [5]

    R., Dalessandro, E., et al

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaac2a Article number, page 6 of 7 Ferraro et al.: GW sources from BFF Cadelano, M., Ferraro, F. R., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 941,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaac2a 2022

  6. [6]

    2023, A&A, 679, L13

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca016 Cadelano, M., Pallanca, C., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, L13. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347961 Calura, F., D’Ercole, A., Vesperini, E., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 3,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca016 2023

  7. [7]

    et al., 2023, ApJ, 951,

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2055 Crociati, C. et al., 2023, ApJ, 951,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2055 2023

  8. [9]

    2024, A&A, 691, A94

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9907 Dalessandro, E., Cadelano, M., Della Croce, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A94. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451054 Deras, D., Cadelano, M., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9907 2024

  9. [10]

    2024, A&A, 681, A38

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca9ce Deras, D., Cadelano, M., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A38. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347547 Di Carlo, U. N., Mapelli, M., Pasquato, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 4,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca9ce 2024

  10. [11]

    L., Gil-Pons, P., Lau, H

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2390 Doherty, C. L., Gil-Pons, P., Lau, H. H. B., et al. 2014a, MNRAS, 441,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2390

  11. [12]

    L., Gil-Pons, P., Lau, H

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu571 Doherty, C. L., Gil-Pons, P., Lau, H. H. B., et al. 2014b, MNRAS, 437,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu571

  12. [13]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1877 Elmegreen, B.G., Bournaud, F., & Elmegreen, D.M., 2008, ApJ, 688,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1877 2008

  13. [14]

    G., Elmegreen, D

    doi:10.1086/592190 Elmegreen, B. G., Elmegreen, D. M., Fernandez, M. X., et al. 2009a, ApJ, 692,

    work page doi:10.1086/592190

  14. [15]

    M., Elmegreen, B

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/12 Elmegreen, D. M., Elmegreen, B. G., Marcus, M. T., et al. 2009b, ApJ, 701,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/692/1/12

  15. [16]

    M., et al

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/701/1/306 Fanelli, C., Origlia, L., Rich, R. M., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A139. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451030 Ferraro, F. R., Dalessandro, E., Mucciarelli, A., et al. 2009, Nature, 462,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/701/1/306 2024

  16. [17]

    R., Massari, D., Dalessandro, E., et al

    doi:10.1038/nature08581 Ferraro, F. R., Massari, D., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828,

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08581 2016

  17. [18]

    R., Mucciarelli, A., Lanzoni, B., et al

    doi:10.3847/0004-637X/828/2/75 Ferraro, F. R., Mucciarelli, A., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2018a, ApJ, 860,

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/828/2/75

  18. [19]

    R., Lanzoni, B., Raso, S., et al

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabe2f Ferraro, F. R., Lanzoni, B., Raso, S., et al. 2018b, ApJ, 860,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabe2f

  19. [20]

    R., Pallanca, C., Lanzoni, B., et al

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac01c Ferraro, F. R., Pallanca, C., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac01c 2021

  20. [21]

    R., Chiappino, L., Bartolomei, A., et al

    doi:10.1038/s41550-020-01267-y Ferraro, F. R., Chiappino, L., Bartolomei, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A179. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554092 Giersz, M., Heggie, D. C., Hurley, J. R., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 3,

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-01267-y 2025

  21. [22]

    2015, MNRAS, 454, 3,

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt307 Giersz, M., Leigh, N., Hypki, A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt307 2015

  22. [23]

    R., Pols, O

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2162 Hurley, J. R., Pols, O. R., & Tout, C. A. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 3,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2162 2000

  23. [24]

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x Harris, W. E. 1996, AJ, A Catalog of Parameters for Globular Clusters in the Milky Way, 112,

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x 2000

  24. [25]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    doi:10.1086/118116 Heinke, C. O., Wijnands, R., Cohn, H. N., et al. 2006, ApJ, 651,

    work page doi:10.1086/118116 2006

  25. [26]

    L., Woosley, S

    doi:10.1086/507884 Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., et al. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1,

    work page doi:10.1086/507884 2003

  26. [27]

    & Giersz, M

    doi:10.1086/375341 Hypki, A. & Giersz, M. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2,

    work page doi:10.1086/375341 2013

  27. [28]

    2018, MNRAS, 480,

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sts415 Hong, J., Vesperini, E., Askar, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts415 2018

  28. [29]

    2020, MNRAS, 498, 3,

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2211 Hong, J., Askar, A., Giersz, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 3,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2211 2020

  29. [30]

    2004, A&A, 413,

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2677 Immeli, A., Samland, M., Gerhard,O., & Westera, P. 2004, A&A, 413,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2677 2004

  30. [31]

    1999, ApJS, 125,

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034282 Iwamoto, K., Brachwitz, F., Nomoto, K., et al. 1999, ApJS, 125,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034282 1999

  31. [32]

    doi:10.1086/313278 Karakas, A. I. 2010, MNRAS, 403,

    work page doi:10.1086/313278 2010

  32. [33]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 2,

    doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2966.2009.16198.x Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 2,

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2009

  33. [34]

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x Krause, M. G. H., Charbonnel, C., Bastian, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, A53. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526685 Johnson, C. I., Rich, R. M., Kobayashi, C., et al. 2014, AJ, 148,

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x 2001

  34. [35]

    R., et al

    doi:10.1088/0004-6256/148/4/67 Lanzoni, B., Dalessandro, E., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/148/4/67 2007

  35. [36]

    R., Dalessandro, E., et al

    doi:10.1086/518592 Lanzoni, B., Ferraro, F. R., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 717,

    work page doi:10.1086/518592 2010

  36. [37]

    R., Mucciarelli, A., et al

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/653 Lanzoni, B., Ferraro, F. R., Mucciarelli, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/653 2018

  37. [38]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac26a Larsen, S. S. 2004, A&A, 416,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac26a 2004

  38. [39]

    R., et al

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034533 Leanza, S., Pallanca, C., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2022, ApJ, 929,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034533 2022

  39. [40]

    R., et al

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5d4e Leanza, S., Pallanca, C., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5d4e 2023

  40. [41]

    R., et al

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acaaa6 Leanza, S., Pallanca, C., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A133. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450147 Libralato, M., Bellini, A., van der Marel, R. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acaaa6 2024

  41. [42]

    Mbarek and D

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ Loriga, M., Pallanca, C., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A156. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453482 MacFadyen, A. I., Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. 2001, ApJ, 550, 1,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ 2025

  42. [43]

    & Kroupa, P

    doi:10.1086/319698 Marks, M. & Kroupa, P. 2012, A&A, 543, A8. doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/201118231 Massari, D., et al., 2014, ApJ, 795, 22 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/22 Matteucci, F. 2021, A&A Rev., 29,

    work page doi:10.1086/319698 2012

  43. [44]

    & Bekki, K

    doi:10.1007/s00159-021-00133-8 McKenzie, M. & Bekki, K. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 3,

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-021-00133-8 2018

  44. [45]

    2013, ARA&A, 51,

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1557 Nomoto, K., Kobayashi, C., & Tominaga, N. 2013, ARA&A, 51,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1557 2013

  45. [46]

    R., Fusi Pecci, F., et al

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140956 Origlia, L., Ferraro, F. R., Fusi Pecci, F., et al. 2002, ApJ, 571,

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140956 2002

  46. [47]

    R., Bellazzini, M., et al

    doi:10.1086/339857 Origlia, L., Ferraro, F. R., Bellazzini, M., et al. 2003, ApJ, 591,

    work page doi:10.1086/339857 2003

  47. [48]

    doi:10.1086/375363 Origlia, L., & Rich, R.M., 2004, AJ, 127,

    work page doi:10.1086/375363 2004

  48. [49]

    M., Ferraro, F

    doi:10.1086/420704 Origlia, L., Rich, R. M., Ferraro, F. R., et al., 2011, ApJ, 726, L20. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/726/2/L20 Origlia, L., Massari, D., Rich, R. M., et al., 2013, ApJ, 779, L5. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/779/1/L5 Origlia, L., Mucciarelli, A., Fiorentino, G., et al., 2019, ApJ, 871,

    work page doi:10.1086/420704 2011

  49. [50]

    R., Fanelli, C., et al

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf730 Origlia, L., Ferraro, F. R., Fanelli, C., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A19. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452110 Padmanabh, P. V ., Ransom, S. M., Freire, P. C. C., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A166. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449303 Pallanca, C., Ferraro, F. R., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf730 2025

  50. [51]

    R., Lanzoni, B., et al

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab35db Pallanca, C., Ferraro, F. R., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab35db 2021

  51. [52]

    R., et al

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0889 Pallanca, C., Leanza, S., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0889 2023

  52. [53]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/accce9 Pfeffer, J., Lardo, C., Bastian, N., Saracino, S., & Kamann, S., 2021, MNRAS, 500,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/accce9 2021

  53. [54]

    M., Hessels, J

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3407 Ransom, S. M., Hessels, J. W. T., Stairs, I. H., et al. 2005, Science, 307,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3407 2005

  54. [55]

    & Starkenburg, E

    doi:10.1126/science.1108632 Romano, D. & Starkenburg, E. 2013, MNRAS, 434,

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1108632 2013

  55. [56]

    2015, MNRAS, 446,

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1033 Romano, D., Bellazzini, M., Starkenburg, E., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1033 2015

  56. [57]

    R., Origlia, L., et al

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2427 Romano, D., Ferraro, F. R., Origlia, L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2427 2023

  57. [58]

    R., et al

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd8ba Saracino, S., Dalessandro, E., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd8ba 2015

  58. [59]

    R., et al

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/152 Saracino, S., Dalessandro, E., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2016, ApJ, 832,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/2/152 2016

  59. [60]

    R., et al

    doi:10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/48 Saracino, S., Dalessandro, E., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874,

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/1/48 2019

  60. [61]

    2015, MNRAS, 451, 4,

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab07c4 Spera, M., Mapelli, M., & Bressan, A. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 4,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab07c4 2015

  61. [62]

    et al., 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3429 doi:10.1093/mnras/stac968 Tinsley, B

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1161 Taylor, D.J. et al., 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3429 doi:10.1093/mnras/stac968 Tinsley, B. M. 1980, Fund. Cosmic Phys., 5,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1161 2022

  62. [63]

    2009, ARA&A, 47,

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.02041 Tolstoy, E., Hill, V ., & Tosi, M. 2009, ARA&A, 47,

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02041 2009

  63. [64]

    J., & Wistrich, A

    doi:10.1146/annurev- astro-082708-101650 Valenti, E., Ferraro, F. R., & Origlia, L. 2010, MNRAS, 402,

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev- 2010

  64. [65]

    MNRAS403(2), 625–645 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15991.x Valenti, E., Zoccali, M., Gonzalez, O. A., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, L6. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527500 Vasiliev, E. & Baumgardt, H. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 4,

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15991.x 2009

  65. [66]

    , keywords =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1475 Verbunt, F. & Hut, P. 1987, 125, 187 Wirth, H., Haas, J., Šubr, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A227. doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/202451223 Article number, page 7 of 7

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1475 1987