pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24856 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.SR

Recognition: unknown

The Bulge Cluster Origin (BulCO) survey with CRIRES at the ESO-VLT: a chemical screening of the Globular Cluster NGC 6553

A. Bartolomei , L. Origlia , C. Fanelli , L. Chiappino , F. R. Ferraro , B. Lanzoni , C. Pallanca , M. Loriga
show 5 more authors
M. Cadelano D. Romano E. Dalessandro D. Massari E. Valenti
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 02:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords globular clusterNGC 6553Galactic bulgechemical abundancesmultiple populationsin-situ formationalpha elements
0
0 comments X

The pith

NGC 6553 formed in situ within the Galactic bulge, as shown by its chemical abundance patterns.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures abundances of 18 elements in 14 red giant branch stars of NGC 6553. It reports a mean iron abundance of -0.20 dex, solar-scaled iron-peak elements, and enhancements in alpha and other light elements, along with spreads in Na, N, and C plus a Na-O anti-correlation that indicate multiple stellar populations. Classical plots of alpha-element ratios against metallicity, together with new plots using vanadium and zinc ratios against metallicity, are used to test the cluster's origin. The patterns match those expected for the inner Milky Way, leading to the conclusion that the cluster formed inside the bulge rather than being brought in from outside. This distinction matters because it helps trace how the dense central regions of galaxies assembled their stellar populations over time.

Core claim

NGC 6553 is a metal-rich globular cluster with mean [Fe/H] = -0.20 dex that shows alpha-element enhancement, nearly solar iron-peak abundances, and the light-element variations plus Na-O anti-correlation that mark genuine globular clusters with multiple populations. When these abundance data are placed on classical [α/Fe] versus [Fe/H] diagrams and on newly introduced [V/Fe] versus [Fe/H] and [Zn/Fe] versus [Fe/H] diagrams, the cluster follows the locus defined by in-situ bulge stars and clusters, establishing its formation inside the Galactic bulge.

What carries the argument

Chemical DNA tests that plot abundance ratios ([α/Fe], [V/Fe], and [Zn/Fe]) against iron metallicity to distinguish in-situ bulge formation from accreted origins.

If this is right

  • NGC 6553 ranks among the most metal-rich globular clusters known in the Milky Way.
  • The cluster contains multiple stellar populations, as shown by the observed spreads in Na, N, and C and the Na-O anti-correlation.
  • The chemical enrichment history of NGC 6553 matches that of the Galactic bulge field population.
  • Abundance ratio diagrams using vanadium and zinc provide an additional diagnostic for classifying other clusters in the bulge region.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same abundance-ratio tests could be applied to other bulge clusters whose origins remain uncertain.
  • If the tests are robust, they imply that many bulge globular clusters formed together with the central stellar population rather than arriving later.
  • Extending these diagnostics to lower-metallicity clusters might reveal whether the bulge's early assembly involved distinct chemical pathways.

Load-bearing premise

The [V/Fe] and [Zn/Fe] ratios versus metallicity act as independent tracers of formation site that are not shaped by the particular stars measured in this cluster.

What would settle it

A globular cluster with a known accreted origin whose stars display the same [V/Fe] and [Zn/Fe] trends versus [Fe/H] as NGC 6553.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24856 by A. Bartolomei, B. Lanzoni, C. Fanelli, C. Pallanca, D. Massari, D. Romano, E. Dalessandro, E. Valenti, F. R. Ferraro, L. Chiappino, L. Origlia, M. Cadelano, M. Loriga.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spectroscopic targets (red squares) observed in NGC 6553. Left panel: (K, J-K) CMD of the cluster (gray dots) with highlighted the target stars for which we measured chemical abun￾dances (from Valenti et al. 2007). Right panel: Position of the targets in the plane of the sky with respect to the cluster cen￾ter (cross). The dashed black circles have radii equal to one, two, and three times the core radius, … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Vector point diagram obtained from Gaia DR3 PMs, for view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Behavior of iron-peak, neutron-capture, CNO, view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top panel: Average abundance of each chemical element view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Trends between pairs of light-element abundance ratios view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Behavior of [α/Fe], [V/Fe] and [Zn/Fe] as a function of [Fe/H] for NGC 6553 (red filled squares). The α-element abun￾dance is the average of Mg, Si, and Ca abundances for each star. For comparison, the abundance ratios measured in Milky Way stars (gray circles; Rich et al. 2012; Johnson et al. 2014; Battis￾tini & Bensby 2015; Barbuy et al. 2015) and in the Magellanic Clouds and Sagittarius dwarf galaxy (bl… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper we present the chemical screening of the stellar population belonging to the globular cluster NGC 6553 in the Galactic bulge. This study has been conducted in the contest of the Bulge Cluster Origin (BulCO) survey, an ESO-VLT Large Program currently ongoing with CRIRES in the NIR domain. This survey is performing an unprecedented chemical screening of 17 stellar systems orbiting the Milky Way bulge, with the aim of unveiling their origin and true nature. Here we present and discuss the abundances of 18 elements produced via distinct nucleosynthetic channels for 14 red giant branch stars belonging to NGC 6553. We found a mean [Fe/H] = -0.20 $\pm$ 0.01 dex, and about solar-scaled iron-peak elements, confirming that this is one of the most metal-rich globular clusters in the Milky Way. We also found [X/Fe] enhancement of $\alpha$ and several other light elements. Furthermore, we assess the presence of multiple populations typical of genuine globular clusters from the significant spreads in Na, N, and C, and an almost vertical Na-O anti-correlation. Finally, by using classical ([$\alpha$/Fe] vs [Fe/H]) and newly-defined ([V/Fe] and [Zn/Fe] vs [Fe/H]) "chemical DNA tests", we prove its in-situ formation within the Galactic bulge.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. This manuscript, part of the BulCO survey, presents CRIRES NIR spectroscopy of 14 RGB stars in the metal-rich globular cluster NGC 6553. It derives abundances for 18 elements, reports [Fe/H] = -0.20 ± 0.01 dex with solar-scaled iron-peak elements, α-element and light-element enhancements, multiple-population signatures (spreads in Na/N/C and a Na-O anticorrelation), and concludes in-situ bulge formation via classical ([α/Fe] vs [Fe/H]) and newly-defined ([V/Fe] and [Zn/Fe] vs [Fe/H]) chemical DNA tests.

Significance. If the newly-defined V and Zn diagnostics prove to be independent and pre-validated on external cluster samples with known origins, the work would add a useful data point for chemical tagging of bulge globular clusters and help distinguish in-situ from accreted populations. The survey context and the reported multiple-population indicators are of interest to the field, but the absence of detailed test construction and supporting data tables currently limits the strength of the central claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript introduces 'newly-defined' ([V/Fe] and [Zn/Fe] vs [Fe/H]) chemical DNA tests as central to proving in-situ formation, yet supplies no description of how these tests were constructed, calibrated, or validated on independent literature samples of clusters with known formation sites. If the abundance patterns or decision boundaries were identified or fitted using the 14 NGC 6553 stars presented here, the argument becomes circular and does not independently confirm the formation site.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No tables of individual stellar abundances, no error budgets, and no discussion of potential systematics or test calibration/validation are provided. This omission prevents assessment of whether the reported spreads (e.g., in Na, N, C) and the chemical DNA test results are robust enough to support the in-situ conclusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses qualitative phrasing ('about solar-scaled', '[X/Fe] enhancement of α and several other light elements') without listing the specific elements or providing quantitative mean values beyond [Fe/H].

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. The comments identify key areas where the manuscript can be strengthened, particularly regarding transparency of the chemical DNA tests and data presentation. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript introduces 'newly-defined' ([V/Fe] and [Zn/Fe] vs [Fe/H]) chemical DNA tests as central to proving in-situ formation, yet supplies no description of how these tests were constructed, calibrated, or validated on independent literature samples of clusters with known formation sites. If the abundance patterns or decision boundaries were identified or fitted using the 14 NGC 6553 stars presented here, the argument becomes circular and does not independently confirm the formation site.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee raising this critical issue of potential circularity. The [V/Fe] and [Zn/Fe] diagnostics were pre-defined from abundance patterns in an independent literature compilation of globular clusters with known in-situ or accreted origins (drawing on prior works such as those establishing the classical [α/Fe] trends). The NGC 6553 measurements were not used to construct or fit the decision boundaries. However, we acknowledge that the current manuscript does not provide sufficient detail on this construction and validation process. In the revised version, we will add a dedicated methods subsection (with supporting figures if needed) that explicitly describes the test definition, the external calibration samples, and the validation steps to ensure the argument is non-circular and fully reproducible. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No tables of individual stellar abundances, no error budgets, and no discussion of potential systematics or test calibration/validation are provided. This omission prevents assessment of whether the reported spreads (e.g., in Na, N, C) and the chemical DNA test results are robust enough to support the in-situ conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that the lack of these elements hinders a full evaluation of robustness. While the manuscript discusses the spreads and multiple-population signatures, we will expand the data presentation and analysis sections. Specifically, we will include a comprehensive table of individual stellar abundances (for all 18 elements) with associated uncertainties, add an explicit error budget section covering random and systematic contributions (e.g., from stellar parameters, continuum placement, and model atmospheres), and provide additional discussion of potential systematics. This will also include further details on the calibration/validation of the V and Zn tests using external samples, directly addressing the referee's concern about assessability. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central claim uses the standard classical [α/Fe] vs [Fe/H] diagnostic, which is an established, externally validated pattern in the literature for distinguishing in-situ bulge vs accreted populations and does not reduce to the NGC 6553 measurements. The newly-defined [V/Fe] and [Zn/Fe] tests are presented as additional diagnostics, but the provided text contains no equations, fits, or explicit construction steps showing that their decision boundaries or patterns were derived from the 14 stars measured here. Without a quoted reduction (e.g., a fitted parameter or self-referential definition applied back to the same data), the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not exhibit circularity by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the newly-defined [V/Fe] and [Zn/Fe] diagnostics cleanly separate in-situ from accreted clusters and that the observed abundance spreads unambiguously indicate multiple populations. No free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Newly-defined [V/Fe] and [Zn/Fe] versus [Fe/H] plots constitute reliable 'chemical DNA tests' for cluster origin.
    Invoked to 'prove' in-situ formation in the final sentence of the abstract.
  • domain assumption Spreads in Na, N, C and the Na-O anti-correlation are definitive signatures of multiple populations in globular clusters.
    Used to confirm NGC 6553 is a genuine globular cluster.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5630 in / 1660 out tokens · 50690 ms · 2026-05-08T02:12:40.435569+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    & Plez, B

    Alvarez, R. & Plez, B. 1998, A&A, 330, 1109 Alvarez Garay, D. A., Fanelli, C., Origlia, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A198

    1998

  2. [2]

    2006, A&A, 460, 269

    Alves-Brito, A., Barbuy, B., Zoccali, M., et al. 2006, A&A, 460, 269

    2006

  3. [3]

    1999, A&A, 347, 572

    Arnould, M., Goriely, S., & Jorissen, A. 1999, A&A, 347, 572

    1999

  4. [4]

    1992, A&A, 259, 607

    Barbuy, B., Castro, S., Ortolani, S., & Bica, E. 1992, A&A, 259, 607

    1992

  5. [5]

    Barbuy, B., Friaça, A. C. S., da Silveira, C. R., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A40

    2015

  6. [6]

    Barbuy, B., Renzini, A., Ortolani, S., Bica, E., & Guarnieri, M. D. 1999, A&A, 341, 539

    1999

  7. [7]

    G., & Muñoz, C

    Barrera, N., Villanova, S., Geisler, D., Fernández-Trincado, J. G., & Muñoz, C. 2025, A&A, 699, A128

    2025

  8. [8]

    & Lardo, C

    Bastian, N. & Lardo, C. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 83

    2018

  9. [9]

    & Bensby, T

    Battistini, C. & Bensby, T. 2015, A&A, 577, A9

    2015

  10. [10]

    & Hilker, M

    Baumgardt, H. & Hilker, M. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 1520

    2018

  11. [11]

    2005, Nucl

    Bisterzo, S., Pompeia, L., Gallino, R., et al. 2005, Nucl. Phys. A, 758, 284

    2005

  12. [12]

    2014, ApJ, 787, 10

    Bisterzo, S., Travaglio, C., Gallino, R., Wiescher, M., & Käppeler, F. 2014, ApJ, 787, 10

    2014

  13. [13]

    2012, MNRAS, 427, 127

    Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127

    2012

  14. [14]

    M., Cautun, M., Deason, A

    Callingham, T. M., Cautun, M., Deason, A. J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 4107

    2022

  15. [15]

    2024, A&A, 691, A226

    Ceccarelli, E., Mucciarelli, A., Massari, D., Bellazzini, M., & Matsuno, T. 2024, A&A, 691, A226

    2024

  16. [16]

    G., Gratton, R

    Cohen, J. G., Gratton, R. G., Behr, B. B., & Carretta, E. 1999, ApJ, 523, 739

    1999

  17. [17]

    E., Bellini, A., Casagrande, L., et al

    Cohen, R. E., Bellini, A., Casagrande, L., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 228

    2021

  18. [18]

    2024, A&A, 691, A311

    Crociati, C., Cignoni, M., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A311

    2024

  19. [19]

    R., et al

    Crociati, C., Valenti, E., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 17

    2023

  20. [20]

    V ., Hasselquist, S., et al

    Cunha, K., Smith, V . V ., Hasselquist, S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 145

    2017

  21. [21]

    2022, ApJ, 940, 170 De Leo, M., Massari, D., Bellazzini, M., et al

    Dalessandro, E., Crociati, C., Cignoni, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 170 De Leo, M., Massari, D., Bellazzini, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.05655

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    R., Lanzoni, B., & Pallanca, C

    Deras, D., Cadelano, M., Ferraro, F. R., Lanzoni, B., & Pallanca, C. 2023, ApJ, 942, 104

    2023

  23. [23]

    2015, A&A, 573, A13

    Dias, B., Barbuy, B., Saviane, I., et al. 2015, A&A, 573, A13

    2015

  24. [24]

    J., Anglada-Escude, G., Baade, D., et al

    Dorn, R. J., Anglada-Escude, G., Baade, D., et al. 2014, The Messenger, 156, 7

    2014

  25. [25]

    J., Bristow, P., Smoker, J

    Dorn, R. J., Bristow, P., Smoker, J. V ., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A24

    2023

  26. [26]

    2021, A&A, 645, A19

    Fanelli, C., Origlia, L., Oliva, E., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A19

    2021

  27. [27]

    M., et al

    Fanelli, C., Origlia, L., Rich, R. M., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A139 Fernández-Trincado, J. G., Villanova, S., Geisler, D., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A116

    2024

  28. [28]

    R., Chiappino, L., Bartolomei, A., et al

    Ferraro, F. R., Chiappino, L., Bartolomei, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A179

    2025

  29. [29]

    R., Dalessandro, E., Mucciarelli, A., et al

    Ferraro, F. R., Dalessandro, E., Mucciarelli, A., et al. 2009, Nature, 462, 483

    2009

  30. [30]

    R., Massari, D., Dalessandro, E., et al

    Ferraro, F. R., Massari, D., Dalessandro, E., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, 75

    2016

  31. [31]

    R., Pallanca, C., Lanzoni, B., et al

    Ferraro, F. R., Pallanca, C., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 311

    2021

  32. [32]

    R., Vesperini, E., Lanzoni, B., et al

    Ferraro, F. R., Vesperini, E., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2026, A&A, accepted, arXiv:2603.25127

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    2025, A&A, 701, A159 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J

    Frelijj, H., González-Díaz, D., Geisler, D., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A159 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1

    2025

  34. [34]

    2025, A&A, 703, A267

    Geisler, D., Muñoz, C., Villanova, S., et al. 2025, A&A, 703, A267

    2025

  35. [35]

    E., et al

    Geisler, D., Villanova, S., O’Connell, J. E., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A157 González-Díaz, D., Fernández-Trincado, J. G., Villanova, S., et al. 2023, MN- RAS, 526, 6274

    2021

  36. [36]

    2019, A&A Rev., 27, 8

    Gratton, R., Bragaglia, A., Carretta, E., et al. 2019, A&A Rev., 27, 8

    2019

  37. [37]

    2008, A&A, 486, 951

    Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B., Eriksson, K., et al. 2008, A&A, 486, 951

    2008

  38. [38]

    Harris, W. E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487

    1996

  39. [39]

    Harris, W. E. 2010, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1012.3224

    work page arXiv 2010

  40. [40]

    Henao, L., Villanova, S., Geisler, D., & Fernández-Trincado, J. G. 2025, A&A, 696, A154

    2025

  41. [41]

    P., Mackereth, J

    Horta, D., Schiavon, R. P., Mackereth, J. T., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3363

    2020

  42. [42]

    I., Rich, R

    Johnson, C. I., Rich, R. M., Kobayashi, C., Kunder, A., & Koch, A. 2014, AJ, 148, 67

    2014

  43. [43]

    2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol

    Kaeufl, H.-U., Ballester, P., Biereichel, P., et al. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 5492, Ground- based Instrumentation for Astronomy, ed. A. F. M. Moorwood & M. Iye, 1218–1227

    2004

  44. [44]

    I., & Lugaro, M

    Kobayashi, C., Karakas, A. I., & Lugaro, M. 2020, ApJ, 900, 179

    2020

  45. [45]

    R., et al

    Loriga, M., Pallanca, C., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A156

    2025

  46. [46]

    2022, A&A, 661, A140

    Magg, E., Bergemann, M., Serenelli, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A140

    2022

  47. [47]

    2017, ApJ, 835, 77

    Marigo, P., Girardi, L., Bressan, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 77

    2017

  48. [48]

    H., & Helmi, A

    Massari, D., Koppelman, H. H., & Helmi, A. 2019, A&A, 630, L4

    2019

  49. [49]

    R., et al

    Massari, D., Mucciarelli, A., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 22

    2014

  50. [50]

    2026, Nature, submitted, arXiv:2601.18896 Meléndez, J., Barbuy, B., Bica, E., et al

    Massari, D., Zerbinati, C., Fanelli, C., et al. 2026, Nature, submitted, arXiv:2601.18896 Meléndez, J., Barbuy, B., Bica, E., et al. 2003, A&A, 411, 417

    work page arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    Montecinos, C., Villanova, S., Muñoz, C., & Cortés, C. C. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 4336

    2021

  52. [52]

    L., et al

    Monty, S., Belokurov, V ., Sanders, J. L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 2420 Muñoz, C., Villanova, S., Geisler, D., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 3742

    2024

  53. [53]

    2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 1247

    Mucciarelli, A., Massari, D., Minelli, A., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 1247

    2021

  54. [54]

    R., Fanelli, C., et al

    Origlia, L., Ferraro, F. R., Fanelli, C., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A19

    2025

  55. [55]

    M., et al

    Origlia, L., Massari, D., Rich, R. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, L5

    2013

  56. [56]

    2019, ApJ, 871, 114

    Origlia, L., Mucciarelli, A., Fiorentino, G., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 114

    2019

  57. [57]

    M., & Castro, S

    Origlia, L., Rich, R. M., & Castro, S. 2002, AJ, 123, 1559

    2002

  58. [58]

    M., Ferraro, F

    Origlia, L., Rich, R. M., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2011, ApJ, 726, L20

    2011

  59. [59]

    2001, A&A, 376, 878

    Ortolani, S., Barbuy, B., Bica, E., et al. 2001, A&A, 376, 878

    2001

  60. [60]

    2007, A&A, 470, 1043

    Ortolani, S., Barbuy, B., Bica, E., Zoccali, M., & Renzini, A. 2007, A&A, 470, 1043

    2007

  61. [61]

    1997, A&AS, 126, 253

    Ortolani, S., Bica, E., & Barbuy, B. 1997, A&AS, 126, 253

    1997

  62. [62]

    1999, A&AS, 138, 267

    Ortolani, S., Bica, E., & Barbuy, B. 1999, A&AS, 138, 267

    1999

  63. [63]

    O., Nardiello, D., Barbuy, B., & Bica, E

    Ortolani, S., Souza, S. O., Nardiello, D., Barbuy, B., & Bica, E. 2025, A&A, 698, A181

    2025

  64. [64]

    2021, MNRAS, 503, 3216

    Palla, M. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 3216

    2021

  65. [65]

    R., Lanzoni, B., et al

    Pallanca, C., Ferraro, F. R., Lanzoni, B., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 159

    2019

  66. [66]

    R., et al

    Pallanca, C., Leanza, S., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 138

    2023

  67. [67]

    2012, Turbospectrum: Code for spectral synthesis, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1205.004

    Plez, B. 2012, Turbospectrum: Code for spectral synthesis, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1205.004

    2012

  68. [68]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 1832

    Prantzos, N., Abia, C., Cristallo, S., Limongi, M., & Chieffi, A. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 1832

    2020

  69. [69]

    M., Origlia, L., & Valenti, E

    Rich, R. M., Origlia, L., & Valenti, E. 2012, ApJ, 746, 59

    2012

  70. [70]

    R., Origlia, L., et al

    Romano, D., Ferraro, F. R., Origlia, L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 85

    2023

  71. [71]

    I., Tosi, M., & Matteucci, F

    Romano, D., Karakas, A. I., Tosi, M., & Matteucci, F. 2010, A&A, 522, A32

    2010

  72. [72]

    & Matteucci, F

    Romano, D. & Matteucci, F. 2007, MNRAS, 378, L59

    2007

  73. [73]

    G., Geisler, D., et al

    Romero-Colmenares, M., Fernández-Trincado, J. G., Geisler, D., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A158

    2021

  74. [74]

    & Pakhomov, Y

    Ryabchikova, T. & Pakhomov, Y . 2015, Baltic Astronomy, 24, 453

    2015

  75. [75]

    R., et al

    Saracino, S., Dalessandro, E., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2016, ApJ, 832, 48

    2016

  76. [76]

    R., et al

    Saracino, S., Dalessandro, E., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 86

    2019

  77. [77]

    R., et al

    Saracino, S., Dalessandro, E., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 152

    2015

  78. [78]

    P., Johnson, J

    Schiavon, R. P., Johnson, J. A., Frinchaboy, P. M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 1010

    2017

  79. [79]

    & Zinn, R

    Searle, L. & Zinn, R. 1978, ApJ, 225, 357

    1978

  80. [80]

    O., Ernandes, H., Valentini, M., et al

    Souza, S. O., Ernandes, H., Valentini, M., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A45

    2023

Showing first 80 references.