pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02732 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Noble-Gas Solubility in Solid and Fluid Metallic Hydrogen

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords noble gas solubilitymetallic hydrogenhigh-pressure physicsab initio molecular dynamicsplanetary interiorsformation free energyphase separationliquid vs solid hydrogen
0
0 comments X

The pith

All noble gases are insoluble in solid metallic hydrogen while heavier ones dissolve in the liquid phase at 500 GPa.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses first-principles calculations to determine whether noble gas atoms can remain mixed inside metallic hydrogen under the pressures found deep inside giant planets. In the solid metallic phase every noble gas from helium through xenon shows a positive formation free energy, so the impurities prefer to separate into their own phase. In the liquid metallic phase argon, krypton and xenon switch to negative formation free energies and therefore mix stably, while helium and neon still separate. The difference arises because the liquid allows disorder that offsets the electronic repulsion felt by the heavier atoms. These results supply a concrete mechanism that could explain how noble gases become fractionated between planetary interiors and atmospheres.

Core claim

Ab initio molecular dynamics combined with free-energy calculations show that all noble gases exhibit positive formation free energies in solid metallic hydrogen at 500 GPa, driven by unfavorable electronic enthalpy and zero-point vibrational contributions. By contrast, heavier noble gases (Ar, Kr, Xe) display negative formation free energies in the liquid phase and therefore appear soluble, while He and Ne remain insoluble. The crossover is attributed to a competition between electronic repulsion and the disorder-driven stabilization that is available only in the liquid.

What carries the argument

First-principles free-energy calculations of the formation energy of noble-gas impurity atoms inserted into solid and liquid metallic hydrogen at fixed 500 GPa.

Load-bearing premise

The ab initio free-energy calculations performed at a single fixed pressure of 500 GPa give accurate thermodynamic stabilities without large errors from the choice of exchange-correlation functional or from finite simulation-cell sizes.

What would settle it

An independent calculation or measurement that finds a negative formation free energy for any noble gas in the solid metallic phase at 500 GPa would directly contradict the reported positive values.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02732 by Graeme J Ackland, Jakkapat Seeyangnok, Udomsilp Pinsook.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Substitutional structure of a noble-gas impurity in solid metallic hydrogen. (b–f) Time evolution of the mean-square displacement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Optimized atomic configurations obtained from the final step [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Radial distribution functions (RDFs) of hydrogen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Mean-square displacement (MSD) and structural correla [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Metallic hydrogen dominates the deep interiors of giant planets, where trace elements interact with dense quantum matter under extreme pressure. We investigate the thermodynamic stability of noble-gas impurities (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe) in metallic hydrogen at 500 GPa using ab initio molecular dynamics combined with first-principles free-energy calculations. In the solid metallic phase, all noble gases exhibit positive formation free energies, driven by unfavorable electronic enthalpy and zero-point vibrational contributions. By contrast, heavier noble gases (Ar, Kr, Xe) appear soluble in liquid hydrogen, while He and Ne phase separate. This crossover reflects a competition between electronic repulsion and disorder-driven stabilization intrinsic to the liquid phase. Our results reveal noble-gas retention in metallic hydrogen, providing a microscopic mechanism for noble-gas fractionation in giant-planet interiors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses ab initio molecular dynamics combined with first-principles free-energy calculations to study the thermodynamic stability of noble-gas impurities (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe) in metallic hydrogen at 500 GPa. It reports that all noble gases exhibit positive formation free energies in the solid metallic phase, driven by unfavorable electronic enthalpy and zero-point vibrational terms, implying phase separation. In the liquid phase, heavier noble gases (Ar, Kr, Xe) are found to be soluble while He and Ne phase-separate, attributed to a competition between electronic repulsion and disorder-driven stabilization. The results are interpreted as providing a mechanism for noble-gas retention and fractionation in giant-planet interiors.

Significance. If the reported formation free energies and solubility crossover hold after validation, the work supplies a microscopic, first-principles basis for noble-gas behavior in dense metallic hydrogen relevant to the interiors of Jupiter and Saturn. This could help explain observed atmospheric noble-gas depletions and fractionation patterns in giant planets.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Methods] Abstract and Methods: The central solubility claims (positive formation free energies for all species in the solid; crossover to solubility for Ar/Kr/Xe in the liquid) rest on free-energy differences whose sign for the marginal cases (Ne, Ar) can be reversed by shifts of only a few meV/atom. No convergence tests with respect to supercell size, k-point sampling, or exchange-correlation functional (e.g., PBE versus a van der Waals functional) are provided, nor are error bars or finite-size corrections reported. These omissions are load-bearing because the electronic enthalpy and zero-point contributions are known to be sensitive to both choices.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the pressure as 500 GPa but does not indicate the temperature range or the precise free-energy technique (thermodynamic integration, harmonic approximation, etc.) used to obtain the reported values.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. We agree that the small energy scales involved in the marginal cases require explicit convergence tests and error estimates, and we will strengthen the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and Methods] Abstract and Methods: The central solubility claims (positive formation free energies for all species in the solid; crossover to solubility for Ar/Kr/Xe in the liquid) rest on free-energy differences whose sign for the marginal cases (Ne, Ar) can be reversed by shifts of only a few meV/atom. No convergence tests with respect to supercell size, k-point sampling, or exchange-correlation functional (e.g., PBE versus a van der Waals functional) are provided, nor are error bars or finite-size corrections reported. These omissions are load-bearing because the electronic enthalpy and zero-point contributions are known to be sensitive to both choices.

    Authors: We agree that additional convergence data are needed to substantiate the reported signs, particularly for Ne and Ar. Our original calculations used 128-atom supercells, Gamma-point sampling for the liquid, and a 2x2x2 k-grid for the solid with the PBE functional. In the revised manuscript we will add: (i) results for 256-atom cells to quantify finite-size corrections to the electronic enthalpy and zero-point terms, (ii) tests with denser k-meshes, (iii) a direct comparison of PBE versus a van der Waals functional (optB88-vdW), and (iv) statistical error bars obtained from multiple independent MD trajectories together with the thermodynamic-integration uncertainty. These tests will be presented in a new Methods subsection and will confirm that the positive formation free energies in the solid and the solubility crossover for Ar/Kr/Xe in the liquid remain robust within the reported precision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: first-principles free-energy results are independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper computes formation free energies directly via ab initio MD and first-principles methods at fixed 500 GPa, obtaining positive values for all noble gases in the solid from explicit electronic enthalpy plus zero-point terms. These quantities are evaluated from the underlying DFT Hamiltonian and phonon calculations without any parameter fitting, self-definition of the target quantity, or load-bearing self-citation that reduces the central claim to an input. The liquid-phase solubility crossover is likewise obtained from the same direct free-energy differences. No step matches any of the enumerated circularity patterns; the derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard density-functional approximations for electronic structure and classical sampling of nuclear motion; no new entities or ad-hoc parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Density-functional theory with a chosen exchange-correlation functional accurately describes electronic enthalpy in dense hydrogen
    Invoked implicitly for all formation-energy calculations at 500 GPa.
  • domain assumption Zero-point vibrational contributions can be computed from harmonic or quasi-harmonic approximations
    Cited as a driver of positive formation energies in the solid phase.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5442 in / 1296 out tokens · 28132 ms · 2026-05-13T18:29:17.300368+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Knudson, M

    M. Knudson, M. Desjarlais, A. Becker, R. Lemke, K. Cochrane, M. Savage, D. Bliss, T. Mattsson, and R. Redmer, Direct obser- vation of an abrupt insulator-to-metal transition in dense liquid deuterium, Science348, 1455 (2015)

  2. [2]

    Silvera, The insulator-metal transition in hydrogen, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 12743 (2010)

    I. Silvera, The insulator-metal transition in hydrogen, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 12743 (2010)

  3. [3]

    Loubeyre, F

    P. Loubeyre, F. Occelli, and P. Dumas, Synchrotron infrared spectroscopic evidence of the probable transition to metal hy- drogen, Nature577, 631 (2020)

  4. [4]

    H. Y . Geng, Q. Wu, M. Marqu ´es, and G. J. Ackland, Thermo- dynamic anomalies and three distinct liquid-liquid transitions in warm dense liquid hydrogen, Phys. Rev. B100, 134109 (2019)

  5. [5]

    Dzyabura, M

    V . Dzyabura, M. Zaghoo, and I. F. Silvera, Evidence of a liquid- liquid phase transition in hot dense hydrogen, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110, 8040 (2013)

  6. [6]

    Van De Bund, H

    S. Van De Bund, H. Wiebe, and G. J. Ackland, Isotope quan- tum effects in the metallization transition in liquid hydrogen, Physical Review Letters126, 225701 (2021)

  7. [7]

    I. B. Magd ˘au, F. Balm, and G. J. Ackland, Theory of high pres- sure hydrogen, made simple, Journal of Physics: Conference Series950, 042059 (2017)

  8. [8]

    L. Lue, C. G. Pruteanu, and G. J. Ackland, The re-entrant tran- sition from the molecular to atomic phases of dense fluids: The case of hydrogen, The Journal of Chemical Physics160(2024). 7

  9. [9]

    Celliers, G

    P. Celliers, G. Collins, L. Da Silva, D. Gold, R. Cauble, R. Wal- lace, M. Foord, and B. Hammel, Shock-induced transformation of liquid deuterium into a metallic fluid, Physical Review Let- ters84, 5564 (2000)

  10. [10]

    Zaghoo, A

    M. Zaghoo, A. Salamat, and I. F. Silvera, Evidence of a first- order phase transition to metallic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. B93, 155128 (2016)

  11. [11]

    Scandolo, Liquid-liquid phase transition in compressed hy- drogen from first-principles simulations, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences100, 3051 (2003)

    S. Scandolo, Liquid-liquid phase transition in compressed hy- drogen from first-principles simulations, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences100, 3051 (2003)

  12. [12]

    M. A. Morales, C. Pierleoni, E. Schwegler, and D. Ceper- ley, Evidence for a first-order liquid-liquid transition in high- pressure hydrogen from ab initio simulations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 12799 (2010)

  13. [13]

    Mazzola and S

    G. Mazzola and S. Sorella, Distinct metallization and atomiza- tion transitions in dense liquid hydrogen, Phys.Rev.Letters114, 105701 (2015)

  14. [14]

    Attaccalite and S

    C. Attaccalite and S. Sorella, Stable liquid hydrogen at high pressure by a novel ab initio molecular-dynamics calculation, Phys.Rev.Letters100, 114501 (2008)

  15. [15]

    Holst, R

    B. Holst, R. Redmer, and M. P. Desjarlais, Thermophysical properties of warm dense hydrogen using quantum molecular dynamics simulations, Physical Review B77, 184201 (2008)

  16. [16]

    M. A. Morales, J. M. McMahon, C. Pierleoni, and D. M. Ceperley, Nuclear quantum effects and nonlocal exchange- correlation functionals applied to liquid hydrogen at high pres- sure, Phys.Rev.Letters110, 065702 (2013)

  17. [17]

    I. B. Magd ˘au and G. J. Ackland, Identification of high-pressure phases iii and iv in hydrogen: Simulating raman spectra using molecular dynamics, Phys. Rev. B87, 174110 (2013)

  18. [18]

    J. M. McMahon and D. M. Ceperley, Ground-state structures of atomic metallic hydrogen, Physical Review Letters106, 165302 (2011)

  19. [19]

    C. J. Pickard and R. J. Needs, Structure of phase iii of solid hydrogen, Nature Physics3, 473 (2007)

  20. [20]

    Cheng, G

    B. Cheng, G. Mazzola, C. J. Pickard, and M. Ceriotti, Evidence for supercritical behaviour of high-pressure liquid hydrogen, Nature585, 217 (2020)

  21. [21]

    Guillot, Interiors of giant planets inside and outside the solar system, science286, 72 (1999)

    T. Guillot, Interiors of giant planets inside and outside the solar system, science286, 72 (1999)

  22. [22]

    Guillot, The interiors of giant planets: Models and outstand- ing questions, Annu

    T. Guillot, The interiors of giant planets: Models and outstand- ing questions, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.33, 493 (2005)

  23. [23]

    Militzer, W

    B. Militzer, W. B. Hubbard, J. V orberger, I. Tamblyn, and S. Bonev, A massive core in jupiter predicted from first- principles simulations, The Astrophysical Journal Letters688, L45 (2008)

  24. [24]

    J. M. McMahon, M. A. Morales, C. Pierleoni, and D. M. Ceper- ley, The properties of hydrogen and helium under extreme con- ditions, Reviews of modern physics84, 1607 (2012)

  25. [25]

    Miguel and A

    Y . Miguel and A. Vazan, Interior and evolution of the giant plan- ets, Remote Sensing15, 681 (2023)

  26. [26]

    R. J. Hemley and N. W. Ashcroft, The revealing role of pressure in the condensed matter sciences, Physics Today51, 26 (1998)

  27. [27]

    Seeyangnok, U

    J. Seeyangnok, U. Pinsook, and G. J. Ackland, Hydrogenation of saturated organic and inorganic molecules in metallic hydro- gen, Nature Communications16, 8548 (2025)

  28. [28]

    Takezawa, H

    H. Takezawa, H. Hsu, K. Hirose, F. Sakai, S. Fu, H. Gomi, S. Miwa, and N. Sakamoto, Formation of iron-helium com- pounds under high pressure, Physical Review Letters134, 084101 (2025)

  29. [29]

    Z. Liu, J. Botana, A. Hermann, S. Valdez, E. Zurek, D. Yan, H.- q. Lin, and M.-s. Miao, Reactivity of he with ionic compounds under high pressure, Nature communications9, 951 (2018)

  30. [30]

    X. Li, A. Hermann, F. Peng, J. Lv, Y . Wang, H. Wang, and Y . Ma, Stable lithium argon compounds under high pressure, Scientific reports5, 16675 (2015)

  31. [31]

    Zhang, S

    J. Zhang, S. Shao, and H. Liu, Pressure-stabilized structures of water-neon system under high pressure, Physical Review B106, 054101 (2022)

  32. [32]

    Zaleski-Ejgierd and P

    P. Zaleski-Ejgierd and P. M. Lata, Krypton oxides under pres- sure, Scientific reports6, 18938 (2016)

  33. [33]

    M. Zou, W. Cui, J. Hao, J. Shi, and Y . Li, Exploring nh x-xe compounds with high hydrogen storage capacity and stability at high pressure, Physical Review B110, 184105 (2024)

  34. [34]

    F. Peng, J. Botana, Y . Wang, Y . Ma, and M. Miao, Unexpected trend in stability of xe–f compounds under pressure driven by xe–xe covalent bonds, The journal of physical chemistry letters 7, 4562 (2016)

  35. [35]

    J. Liu, J. Zhu, H. Yu, Z. Zhang, G. Wu, A. Yao, L. Pan, K. Bao, and T. Cui, Structural phase transition and decomposition of xef2 under high pressure and its formation of xe–xe covalent bonds, Inorganic Chemistry63, 12248 (2024)

  36. [36]

    Wigner and H

    E. Wigner and H. ´a. Huntington, On the possibility of a metallic modification of hydrogen, The Journal of Chemical Physics3, 764 (1935)

  37. [37]

    Nagao, H

    K. Nagao, H. Nagara, and S. Matsubara, Structures of hydrogen at megabar pressures, Physical Review B56, 2295 (1997)

  38. [38]

    Natoli, R

    V . Natoli, R. M. Martin, and D. Ceperley, Crystal structure of atomic hydrogen, Physical review letters70, 1952 (1993)

  39. [39]

    Barbee III and M

    T. Barbee III and M. L. Cohen, Theoretical study of atomic phases of metallic hydrogen, Physical Review B44, 11563 (1991)

  40. [40]

    D. M. Ceperley and B. J. Alder, Ground state of solid hydrogen at high pressures, Physical Review B36, 2092 (1987)

  41. [41]

    McMinis, R

    J. McMinis, R. C. Clay III, D. Lee, and M. A. Morales, Molec- ular to atomic phase transition in hydrogen under high pressure, Physical Review Letters114, 105305 (2015)

  42. [42]

    Ackland and I

    G. Ackland and I. Macleod, Origin of the complex crystal structures of elements at intermediate pressure, New Journal of Physics6, 138 (2004)

  43. [43]

    I. F. Silvera and R. Dias, Phases of the hydrogen isotopes un- der pressure: metallic hydrogen, Advances in Physics: X6, 1961607 (2021)

  44. [44]

    R. P. Dias and I. F. Silvera, Observation of the Wigner- Huntington transition to metallic hydrogen, Science355, 715 (2017)

  45. [45]

    Eremets and I

    M. Eremets and I. Troyan, Conductive dense hydrogen, Nature materials10, 927 (2011)

  46. [46]

    N. W. Ashcroft, Metallic hydrogen: a high-temperature super- conductor?, Physical Review Letters21, 1748 (1968)

  47. [47]

    J. M. McMahon and D. M. Ceperley, High-temperature su- perconductivity in atomic metallic hydrogen, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics84, 144515 (2011)

  48. [48]

    N. D. Drummond, B. Monserrat, J. H. Lloyd-Williams, P. L. R´ıos, C. J. Pickard, and R. J. Needs, Quantum monte carlo study of the phase diagram of solid molecular hydrogen at extreme pressures, Nature communications6, 7794 (2015)

  49. [49]

    Monacelli, M

    L. Monacelli, M. Casula, K. Nakano, S. Sorella, and F. Mauri, Quantum phase diagram of high-pressure hydrogen, Nature Physics19, 845 (2023)

  50. [50]

    D. J. Stevenson, Interiors of the giant planets, In: Annual review of earth and planetary sciences. V olume 10.(A82-35776 17-88) Palo Alto, CA, Annual Reviews, Inc., 1982, p. 257-295.10, 257 (1982)

  51. [51]

    Chabrier and I

    G. Chabrier and I. Baraffe, Heat transport in giant (exo) planets: a new perspective, The Astrophysical Journal Letters661, L81 8 (2007)

  52. [52]

    Leconte and G

    J. Leconte and G. Chabrier, A new vision of giant planet in- teriors: Impact of double diffusive convection, Astronomy & Astrophysics540, A20 (2012)

  53. [53]

    H. F. Wilson and B. Militzer, Rocky core solubility in jupiter and giant exoplanets, Physical Review Letters108, 111101 (2012)

  54. [54]

    Gonz ´alez-Cataldo, H

    F. Gonz ´alez-Cataldo, H. F. Wilson, and B. Militzer, Ab initio free energy calculations of the solubility of silica in metallic hydrogen and application to giant planet cores, The Astrophys- ical Journal787, 79 (2014)

  55. [55]

    S. M. Wahl, H. F. Wilson, and B. Militzer, Solubility of iron in metallic hydrogen and stability of dense cores in giant planets, The Astrophysical Journal773, 95 (2013)

  56. [56]

    Seeyangnok, U

    J. Seeyangnok, U. Pinsook, and G. J. Ackland, Solid solubility in metallic hydrogen, Physical Review B111, 224303 (2025)

  57. [57]

    Helled and D

    R. Helled and D. J. Stevenson, The fuzzy cores of jupiter and saturn, AGU Advances5, e2024A V001171 (2024)

  58. [58]

    H. F. Wilson and B. Militzer, Sequestration of noble gases in gi- ant planet interiors, Physical review letters104, 121101 (2010)

  59. [59]

    Mahaffy, H

    P. Mahaffy, H. Niemann, A. Alpert, S. Atreya, J. Demick, T. Donahue, D. Harpold, and T. Owen, Noble gas abundance and isotope ratios in the atmosphere of jupiter from the galileo probe mass spectrometer, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets105, 15061 (2000)

  60. [60]

    T. Owen, P. Mahaffy, H. Niemann, S. Atreya, T. Donahue, A. Bar-Nun, and I. de Pater, A low-temperature origin for the planetesimals that formed jupiter, Nature402, 269 (1999)

  61. [61]

    M. A. Morales, E. Schwegler, D. Ceperley, C. Pierleoni, S. Hamel, and K. Caspersen, Phase separation in hydrogen– helium mixtures at mbar pressures, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106, 1324 (2009)

  62. [62]

    B. Militzer, Equation of state calculations of hydrogen-helium mixtures in solar and extrasolar giant planets, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics87, 014202 (2013)

  63. [63]

    Lorenzen, B

    W. Lorenzen, B. Holst, and R. Redmer, Demixing of hydrogen and helium at megabar pressures, Physical review letters102, 115701 (2009)

  64. [64]

    J. J. Fortney and N. Nettelmann, The interior structure, compo- sition, and evolution of giant planets, Space Science Reviews 152, 423 (2010)

  65. [65]

    Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future, Reviews of modern physics87, 897 (2015)

  66. [66]

    H. Zong, H. Wiebe, and G. J. Ackland, Understanding high pressure molecular hydrogen with a hierarchical machine- learned potential, Nature communications11, 5014 (2020)

  67. [67]

    Istas, S

    M. Istas, S. Jensen, Y . Yang, M. Holzmann, C. Pierleoni, and D. M. Ceperley, Liquid-liquid phase transition of hydrogen and its critical point: Analysis from ab initio simulation and a machine-learned potential, Physical Review E111, 045307 (2025)

  68. [68]

    Kirsz, A

    M. Kirsz, A. Daramola, A. Hermann, H. Zong, and G. J. Ack- land, Tadah! a swiss army knife for developing and deployment of machine learning interatomic potentials, Computer Physics Communications315, 109701 (2025)

  69. [69]

    S. J. Clark, M. D. Segall, C. J. Pickard, P. J. Hasnip, M. J. Probert, K. Refson, and M. Payne, First principles methods us- ing CASTEP, Z. Kristall.220, 567 (2005)

  70. [70]

    Parrinello and A

    M. Parrinello and A. Rahman, Polymorphic transitions in single-crystals - a new molecular-dynamics method., J. Appl. Phys.52, 7182 (1981)

  71. [71]

    G. L. Martyna, M. L. Klein, and M. Tuckerman, Nos ´e-Hoover chains: The canonical ensemble via continuous dynamics, J. Chem. Phys.97, 2635 (1992)

  72. [72]

    W. C. Swope, H. C. Andersen, P. H. Berens, and K. R. Wilson, A computer-simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium-constants for the formation of physical clusters of molecules - application to small water clusters, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 637 (1982)

  73. [73]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. De Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Reviews of modern Physics73, 515 (2001)

  74. [74]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo,et al., Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, Journal of physics: Condensed matter21, 395502 (2009)

  75. [75]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical review letters77, 3865 (1996)

  76. [76]

    V . L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougr´eeff, and R. Dronskowski, Crystal orbital hamilton population (cohp) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets, The journal of physical chemistry A115, 5461 (2011)

  77. [77]

    Maintz, V

    S. Maintz, V . L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougr ´eeff, and R. Dron- skowski, Analytic projection from plane-wave and paw wave- functions and application to chemical-bonding analysis in solids, Journal of computational chemistry34, 2557 (2013)

  78. [78]

    Maintz, V

    S. Maintz, V . L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougr ´eeff, and R. Dron- skowski, Lobster: A tool to extract chemical bonding from plane-wave based dft (2016)