pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.03288 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-25 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · physics.ins-det· physics.optics· quant-ph

Quantum Magnetometers for Infrastructure Inspection and Monitoring

Muhammad Mahmudul Hasan , Ingrid Torres , Alex Krasnok This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 23:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph physics.ins-detphysics.opticsquant-ph
keywords quantum magnetometersinfrastructure inspectionoptically pumped magnetometersnitrogen-vacancy centersmagnetic flux leakagenon-destructive testingcorrosion detectionfield monitoring
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum magnetometers detect hidden infrastructure damage through complementary OPM and NV strengths when practical engineering is applied.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review compares two room-temperature quantum magnetometer platforms for sensing magnetic signals from infrastructure defects such as corrosion under insulation, fatigue in steel, and abnormal currents in power equipment. It organizes the evidence around four signal classes and evaluates each sensor type as part of a complete chain that includes source, geometry, readout, and calibration rather than as isolated devices. A sympathetic reader would care because these sensors can operate without contact or couplants and sense through coatings and concrete, overcoming limits of traditional pickup coils at low frequencies. The central finding is that usable bandwidth, dynamic range, background rejection, and calibration matter more than peak sensitivity for field success.

Core claim

The paper establishes that optically pumped atomic magnetometers are strongest for low-frequency, phase-referenced induction measurements while nitrogen-vacancy diamond magnetometers are strongest for near-surface field mapping, vector or gradient measurements, and differential current sensing in compact solid-state heads. Across driven induction, leakage fields, passive self-fields from stress or corrosion, and operational current fields, deployment hinges on addressing lift-off, noise, and calibration through instrument engineering rather than best-case sensitivity alone.

What carries the argument

The full measurement chain of source physics, geometry, readout, calibration, and interpretation applied to four magnetic signal classes: driven induction responses, leakage fields in magnetic flux leakage inspection, passive self-fields linked to stress or corrosion, and fields produced by operational currents.

If this is right

  • OPMs enable reliable low-frequency phase-referenced induction measurements for inspecting insulated or buried infrastructure.
  • NV sensors support compact heads for vector and gradient mapping of near-surface corrosion or fatigue in steel.
  • Both platforms allow non-contact sensing through coatings and concrete cover without couplants.
  • Success requires qualification protocols that match real inspection conditions rather than laboratory ideals.
  • The emphasis shifts from raw sensitivity to engineering for bandwidth, dynamic range, and background rejection.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These platforms could support continuous monitoring of battery currents or power-line leakage by using differential sensing modes.
  • Robotic deployment with controlled lift-off geometry might make large-area scans practical for bridges and pipelines.
  • Hybrid OPM-NV instruments could combine low-frequency phase referencing with high-resolution near-surface mapping.
  • Direct comparison trials against established non-destructive methods on operational assets would test whether engineering fixes are sufficient for routine use.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that lift-off variations, background magnetic noise, and calibration difficulties can be adequately addressed through instrument engineering to enable reliable field deployment.

What would settle it

A controlled field test on a known corroded pipeline or fatigued steel beam in which the quantum sensors fail to detect defects at lift-off distances or noise levels typical of real inspections while conventional methods succeed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03288 by Alex Krasnok, Ingrid Torres, Muhammad Mahmudul Hasan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Infrastructure magnetometry overview. Left: representative hidden-damage cases that motivate sensing at stand-off ℎ, including corrosion under insulation (CUI) on steel, corroded rebar in concrete, and current redistribution in batteries or busbars. Top: two field workflows—inspection (a one-time scan to support a repair decision) and monitoring (repeatable measurements to track change). Bottom: receiver-c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Operating principle of an alkali-vapor magnetometer. (a) Circularly polarized pump light spin-polarizes an alkali vapor (Rb, Cs, or K), producing a macroscopic magnetization aligned with the pump axis or a chosen bias field 𝐵0. (b) Changes in magnetic field drive spin precession, which is read out optically, commonly through probe-beam polarization rotation and polarimetric detection. For field deployment,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Diamond NV-center magnetometer. (a) Magnetic-field projection onto the NV axis, so the relevant measured quantity is the axial component 𝐵∥ = B · uˆ NV. (b) Optical initialization and spin-dependent fluorescence readout. Green excitation prepares the spin toward the 𝑚𝑠 = 0 state, while the fluorescence depends on spin state. (c) ODMR resonance shift under magnetic field: Zeeman splitting separates the reso… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Atomic-magnetometer electromagnetic induction imaging (EMI). (a) A drive coil generates the primary field and induced eddy currents; the magnetometer detects the secondary magnetic response. (b–e) Representative lock-in amplitude and phase maps over aluminum plates with concealed recesses and cavities. (f,g) Frequency-dependent contrast for different defect depths, illustrating tunable depth sensitivity th… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Atomic-magnetometer EMI of concealed metal loss. (a,b) Steel plate measurements showing phase and amplitude contrast for recesses of increasing depth [56]. (c,d) Insulated aluminum specimen with recesses and a through-cut defect, with frequency-dependent contrast used to tune depth sensitivity [57]. specimens containing concealed recesses and cavities [53]. Figures 4(f,g) show the key practical control par… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Representative stray-field geometry for a crack in magnetized steel as used in magnetic flux leakage (MFL) inspection. (a) A magnetizer drives flux through the steel; a defect perturbs the flux path and produces a leakage field above the surface, measured at a stand-off (lift-off) distance ℎ while scanning in 𝑦. (b) Example out-of-plane magnetic flux density component 𝐵𝑧 at ℎ = 2.0 mm (scale bar: 5 mm) wit… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Experimental NV-center (NV-C) imaging of metal damage and defects. (I) Fiber-coupled NV-C magnetometer used to image damage in steel by monitoring shifts of the NV Zeeman splitting caused by distortion of an intentionally inhomogeneous magnetic field; the approach operated without magnetic shielding, worked through nonmagnetic cover layers, and demonstrated mm-scale lateral defect imaging at lift-off dista… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Metal magnetic memory (MMM)–based stress-concentration diagnostics in ferromagnetic pipelines. (a) Schematic of a MMM inspection system and automated stress-concentration evaluation workflow. (b) Evolution of MMM signals and 𝐻pp with increasing fatigue cycles, showing the progressive amplification of magnetic anomalies at stress-concentration zones. (c) Residual stress distributions along the specimen surf… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fatigue monitoring in steel using an optically pumped atomic magnetometer (OPM) as the magnetic receiver during cyclic loading. (A) Experimental setup showing the OPM position relative to the specimen, load frame, and optical strain measurement. (B) Example time traces of applied force 𝐹 (N) and measured magnetic signal 𝐵 (nT), with snapshots of crack evolution. (C) Cycle-dependent indicators extracted fro… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: NV-center stress-tensor imaging in diamond. (a) Conceptual geometry for generating and probing stress in the diamond host near an NV layer. (b) Photoluminescence (PL) image used to locate the region of interest (scale bar: 20 𝜇m). (c) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) topography showing nanoscale surface deformation (height 𝑧 in nm; scale bar: 2 𝜇m). (d) Line profile of the AFM height along the marked directi… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Battery diagnostics using atomic magnetometry. (A) Experimental platform for induced-field imaging of miniature solid-state lithium-ion cells, using a long solenoid, magnetic shielding, a motorized translation stage, and an atomic magnetometer positioned in a low-primary-field region so that the measured signal is dominated by the battery-induced field. (B) Comparison of healthy and thermally damaged cell… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: NV-center eddy-current imaging of solid-state batteries. (a) Experimental setup for microwave-free NV-based eddy-current imaging with optical pumping, bias-field control, RF excitation, lock-in detection, and a scanning stage. (b) Battery structure and sample photograph highlighting an external defect, with corresponding lock-in amplitude and phase maps at 1 kHz. (c) Lock-in amplitude and phase images at … view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: NV-center magnetometry for high-precision current monitoring in battery-relevant conductors and busbars. (a) Fiber-coupled NV-diamond sensor head, in which a small diamond element is attached to the end of an optical fiber for compact local magnetic-field detection. (b) Differential sensing concept using two NV sensors on opposite sides of a current-carrying busbar so that the busbar field adds while comm… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Damage in infrastructure is often hidden until it becomes costly or dangerous. Common examples include corrosion under insulation, early fatigue damage in steel, corrosion of embedded reinforcement, and abnormal current flow in batteries and power equipment. Magnetic methods are attractive because they can sense through coatings, insulation, and concrete cover without couplants, but field performance is often limited by lift-off, low-frequency drift, background magnetic noise, and the weak low-frequency response of pickup coils. This review examines two room-temperature quantum receiver platforms: optically pumped atomic magnetometers (OPMs) and nitrogen-vacancy (NV) diamond magnetometers. Rather than treating them as stand-alone sensors, we compare them as parts of a full measurement chain that includes source physics, geometry, readout, calibration, and interpretation. The literature is organized into four magnetic signal classes: driven induction responses, leakage fields in magnetic flux leakage inspection, passive self-fields linked to stress or corrosion, and fields produced by operational currents. OPMs are strongest for low-frequency, phase-referenced induction measurements, while NV sensors are strongest for near-surface field mapping, vector or gradient measurements, and differential current sensing in compact solid-state heads. Across all applications, deployment depends less on best-case sensitivity than on usable bandwidth, dynamic range, background rejection, geometry control, calibration, and validation. The clearest path to field use is therefore robust instrument engineering tied to qualification methods that reflect real inspection conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a literature review that organizes existing work on room-temperature quantum magnetometers into four magnetic signal classes (driven induction responses, leakage fields in magnetic flux leakage inspection, passive self-fields linked to stress or corrosion, and fields produced by operational currents) and compares optically pumped atomic magnetometers (OPMs) against nitrogen-vacancy (NV) diamond sensors as parts of complete measurement chains. The central interpretive claim is that OPMs are strongest for low-frequency, phase-referenced induction measurements while NV sensors are strongest for near-surface field mapping, vector/gradient measurements, and differential current sensing in compact solid-state heads, with field deployment depending primarily on bandwidth, dynamic range, background rejection, geometry control, calibration, and validation rather than peak sensitivity.

Significance. If the synthesis holds, the review supplies a structured framework that could help practitioners select between OPM and NV platforms for non-destructive infrastructure inspection tasks such as corrosion-under-insulation detection and current monitoring. By stressing the full measurement chain and the primacy of engineering factors over raw sensitivity, it identifies concrete qualification paths that may accelerate translation from laboratory demonstrations to field use.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The four signal-class taxonomy is introduced in the abstract but would benefit from an explicit table or diagram early in the manuscript that lists representative references, frequency ranges, and sensor strengths for each class to improve readability.
  2. [Conclusions] Several practical challenges (lift-off, background noise, calibration) are listed as deployment bottlenecks; adding a short dedicated subsection that maps each challenge to specific mitigation strategies drawn from the cited OPM and NV literature would strengthen the engineering-focused conclusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and accurate summary of our manuscript, which correctly captures our organization of the literature into four magnetic signal classes and our emphasis on comparing OPM and NV platforms as complete measurement chains rather than isolated sensors. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper organizes existing literature with no derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is a literature review that synthesizes published results on OPM and NV magnetometers across four signal classes. The central claims are interpretive comparisons drawn from external sources rather than any new derivation, model fit, or prediction. No equations, ansatzes, uniqueness theorems, or self-referential constructions appear that could reduce to the paper's own inputs. The structure is self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no load-bearing self-citations that substitute for independent evidence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review and does not introduce new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it discusses established technologies from the literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5560 in / 1145 out tokens · 53600 ms · 2026-05-14T23:52:48.798126+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Executive summary: International measures of prevention, application, and economics of corrosion technologies (IMPACT), 2016

    NACE International. Executive summary: International measures of prevention, application, and economics of corrosion technologies (IMPACT), 2016. Accessed 2026-02-06

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Fact sheet: Corrosion

    Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). Fact sheet: Corrosion. Accessed 2026-02-12

    work page 2026

  3. [3]

    Infrastructure’s upward momentum reflected in report card, March 2025

    Matt Fogleson. Infrastructure’s upward momentum reflected in report card, March 2025. Civil Engineering Source (ASCE); accessed 2026-02-12

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Farima Abdollahi-Mamoudan, Clemente Ibarra-Castanedo, and Xavier P. V. Maldague. Non- destructive testing and evaluation of hybrid and advanced structures: a comprehensive review of methods, applications, and emerging trends.Sensors, 25(12):3635, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Feng et al

    B. Feng et al. A review of magnetic flux leakage nondestructive testing.Sensors, 22(21):8212, 2022. 32

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Recentprogressoffluxgatemagneticsensors: basicresearchandapplication.Sensors, 21(4):1500, 2021

    S.Weietal. Recentprogressoffluxgatemagneticsensors: basicresearchandapplication.Sensors, 21(4):1500, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Guedes et al

    A. Guedes et al. Hybrid GMR sensor detecting 950 pt/ √ hzat 1 hz and bio-magnetic signals in an unshielded environment.Sensors, 18(3):790, 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Pulsed eddy current non-destructive testing and evaluation: a review.Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 30:500–514, 2017

    Ali Sophian, Guiyun Tian, and Mengbao Fan. Pulsed eddy current non-destructive testing and evaluation: a review.Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 30:500–514, 2017

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Api recommended practice 583: Corrosion under insulation and fireproofing(firstedition),May2014

    American Petroleum Institute. Api recommended practice 583: Corrosion under insulation and fireproofing(firstedition),May2014. APIRecommendedPractice;ProductNo.C58301.Summary available at https://www.api.org/ /media/files/publications/whats

    work page

  10. [10]

    SQUIDsfornondestructiveevaluation.Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 30(3):293–323, 1997

    W.G.Jenks,S.S.H.Sadeghi,andJ.P.Jr.Wikswo. SQUIDsfornondestructiveevaluation.Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 30(3):293–323, 1997

    work page 1997

  11. [11]

    T. M. Tierney, N. Holmes, S. Mellor, et al. Optically pumped magnetometers: from quantum origins to multi-channel magnetoencephalography.NeuroImage, 199:598–608, 2019

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Budker and M

    D. Budker and M. V. Romalis. Optical magnetometry.Nature Physics, 3(4):227–234, 2007

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro. Quantum sensing.Reviews of Modern Physics, 89(3):035002, 2017

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Walsworth

    JohnF.Barry,JenniferM.Schloss,ErikBauch,MatthewJ.Turner,ConnorA.Hart,LinhM.Pham, and Ronald L. Walsworth. Sensitivity optimization for NV-diamond magnetometry.Reviews of Modern Physics, 92(1):015004, 2020

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Sensitivemagnetometry in challenging environments.AVS Quantum Science, 2(4):044702, 2020

    Kai-MeiC.Fu,GeoffreyZ.Iwata,ArneWickenbrock,andDmitryBudker. Sensitivemagnetometry in challenging environments.AVS Quantum Science, 2(4):044702, 2020

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    MIL-HDBK-1823: Nondestructive evaluation system reliability assessment(assist-quicksearchdocumentdetails),November2018

    Defense Logistics Agency (DLA). MIL-HDBK-1823: Nondestructive evaluation system reliability assessment(assist-quicksearchdocumentdetails),November2018. Documentdate: 13-NOV-2018; accessed 2026-02-06

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    ASTM e2862-23: Standard practice for probability of detection analysis for hit/miss data, 2023

    ASTM International. ASTM e2862-23: Standard practice for probability of detection analysis for hit/miss data, 2023. Accessed 2026-02-06

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Scofield

    John H. Scofield. Frequency-domain description of a lock-in amplifier.American Journal of Physics, 62(2):129–133, 1994

    work page 1994

  19. [19]

    M. L. Meade.Lock-In Amplifiers: Principles and Applications. Peter Peregrinus Ltd., 1983

    work page 1983

  20. [20]

    Edge-machine-learning-assisted robust magnetometer based on randomly oriented NV-ensembles in diamond.Sensors, 23(3):1119, 2023

    Jonas Homrighausen, Ludwig Horsthemke, Jens Pogorzelski, Sarah Trinschek, Peter Gl"osek"otter, and Markus Gregor. Edge-machine-learning-assisted robust magnetometer based on randomly oriented NV-ensembles in diamond.Sensors, 23(3):1119, 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Iivanainen et al

    J. Iivanainen et al. Calibration and localization of optically pumped magnetometers using electromagnetic coils.Sensors, 22(8):3059, 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Huang et al

    S. Huang et al. Deep learning for magnetic flux leakage detection and evaluation of oil and gas pipelines: a review.Energies, 16(3):1372, 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    A novel machine learning model for eddy current testing with uncertainty.NDT & E International, 101:104–112, 2019

    Peipei Zhu, Yuhua Cheng, Portia Banerjee, Antonello Tamburrino, and Yiming Deng. A novel machine learning model for eddy current testing with uncertainty.NDT & E International, 101:104–112, 2019. 33

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Duclos, G

    Romain Cormerais, Roberto Longo, A. Duclos, G. Wasselynck, and G. Berthiau. Non destructive eddy currents inversion using artificial neural networks and data augmentation.NDT & E International, 129:102635, 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    John Kitching, Svenja Knappe, and Elizabeth A. Donley. Atomic sensors — a review.IEEE Sensors Journal, 11(9):1749–1758, 2011

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Vishal Shah, Svenja Knappe, Peter D. D. Schwindt, and John Kitching. Subpicotesla atomic magnetometry with a microfabricated vapour cell.Nature Photonics, 1(11):649–652, 2007

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    H. B. Dang, Adam C. Maloof, and Michael V. Romalis. Ultrahigh sensitivity magnetic field and magnetizationmeasurementswithanatomicmagnetometer.AppliedPhysicsLetters,97(15):151110, 2010

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    High-sensitivityatomicmagnetometer unaffected by spin-exchange relaxation.Physical Review Letters, 89:130801, 2002

    J.C.Allred,R.N.Lyman,T.W.Kornack,andM.V.Romalis. High-sensitivityatomicmagnetometer unaffected by spin-exchange relaxation.Physical Review Letters, 89:130801, 2002

    work page 2002

  29. [29]

    I. K. Kominis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred, and M. V. Romalis. A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer.Nature, 422(6932):596–599, 2003

    work page 2003

  30. [30]

    Sub-picotesla widely tunable atomic magnetometer operating at room temperature in unshielded environments.Review of Scientific Instruments, 89(8):083111, 2018

    Cameron Deans, Luca Marmugi, and Ferruccio Renzoni. Sub-picotesla widely tunable atomic magnetometer operating at room temperature in unshielded environments.Review of Scientific Instruments, 89(8):083111, 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Electromagnetic induction imaging with atomic magne- tometers: progress and perspectives.Applied Sciences, 10(18):6370, 2020

    Luca Marmugi and Ferruccio Renzoni. Electromagnetic induction imaging with atomic magne- tometers: progress and perspectives.Applied Sciences, 10(18):6370, 2020

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Oelsner et al

    G. Oelsner et al. Integrated optically pumped magnetometer for measurements within earth’s magnetic field.Physical Review Applied, 17(2):024034, 2022

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    P. D. D. Schwindt, S. Knappe, V. Shah, L. Hollberg, J. Kitching, L.-A. Liew, and J. Moreland. Chip-scale atomic magnetometer.Applied Physics Letters, 85(26):6409–6411, 2004

    work page 2004

  34. [34]

    Chip-scale atomic devices.Applied Physics Reviews, 5(3):031302, 2018

    John Kitching. Chip-scale atomic devices.Applied Physics Reviews, 5(3):031302, 2018

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Magnetic field imaging with microfabricated optically-pumped magnetometers.Optics Express, 25(7):7849–7858, 2017

    OrangAlem,RahulMhaskar,RicardoJiménez-Martínez,DongSheng,JohnLeBlanc,LutzTrahms, Tilmann Sander, John Kitching, and Svenja Knappe. Magnetic field imaging with microfabricated optically-pumped magnetometers.Optics Express, 25(7):7849–7858, 2017

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. L. Hollenberg. The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond.Physics Reports, 528(1):1–45, 2013

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Rondin, J.-P

    L. Rondin, J.-P. Tetienne, T. Hingant, J.-F. Roch, P. Maletinsky, and V. Jacques. Magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond.Reports on Progress in Physics, 77(5):056503, 2014

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    V. M. Acosta, E. Bauch, M. P. Ledbetter, C. Santori, K.-M. C. Fu, P. E. Barclay, R. G. Beausoleil, H. Linget, J.-F. Roch, F. Treussart, S. Chemerisov, W. Gawlik, and D. Budker. Temperature dependence of the nitrogen-vacancy magnetic resonance in diamond.Physical Review Letters, 104:070801, 2010

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    Schloss, John F

    Jennifer M. Schloss, John F. Barry, Matthew J. Turner, and Ronald L. Walsworth. Simultaneous broadband vector magnetometry using solid-state spins.Physical Review Applied, 10(3):034044, 2018

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    A. E. Krasnok, A. Maloshtan, D. N. Chigrin, Y. S. Kivshar, and P. A. Belov. Enhanced emission extraction and selective excitation of NV centers with all-dielectric nanoantennas.Laser & Photonics Reviews, 9(4):385–391, 2015. 34

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    A. E. Krasnok, C. R. Simovski, P. A. Belov, and Y. S. Kivshar. Superdirective dielectric nanoantennas.Nanoscale, 6(13):7354–7361, 2014

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    R. L. Patel, L. Q. Zhou, A. C. Frangeskou, G. A. Stimpson, B. G. Breeze, A. Nikitin, M. W. Dale, E. C. Nichols, W. Thornley, B. L. Green, M. E. Newton, A. M. Edmonds, M. L. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and G. W. Morley. Subnanotesla magnetometry with a fiber-coupled diamond sensor. Physical Review Applied, 14(4):044058, 2020

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Pham, Carson Teale, Kerry A

    Hannah Clevenson, Linh M. Pham, Carson Teale, Kerry A. Johnson, Dirk Englund, and Danielle Braje. Robusthigh-dynamic-rangevectormagnetometrywithnitrogen-vacancycentersindiamond. Applied Physics Letters, 112(25):252406, 2018

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Kumar, D

    H. Kumar, D. Shishir, M. Mangat, S. Tallur, and K. Saha. High dynamic-range and portable mag- netometer using ensemble nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond.Review of Scientific Instruments, 95(7):075002, 2024

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    St"urner, Andreas Brenneis, et al

    Felix M. St"urner, Andreas Brenneis, et al. Compact integrated magnetometer based on nitrogen- vacancy centres in diamond.Diamond and Related Materials, 93:59–65, 2019

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    F. M. St"urner et al. Integrated and portable magnetometer based on nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond.Advanced Quantum Technologies, 4(4):2000111, 2021

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Nikitin, A

    S.M.Graham,A.T.M.A.Rahman,L.Munn,R.L.Patel,A.J.Newman,C.J.Stephen,G.Colston, A. Nikitin, A. M. Edmonds, D. J. Twitchen, et al. Fiber-coupled diamond magnetometry with an unshielded sensitivity of 30 pt/ √ hz.Physical Review Applied, 19(4):044042, 2023

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Z. D. Wang, Y. Gu, and Y. S. Wang. A review of three magnetic NDT technologies.Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 324(4):382–388, 2012

    work page 2012

  49. [49]

    Non-destructivetechniques based on eddy current testing.Sensors, 11(3):2525–2565, 2011

    JavierGarcía-Martín,JaimeGómez-Gil,andErnestoVázquez-Sánchez. Non-destructivetechniques based on eddy current testing.Sensors, 11(3):2525–2565, 2011

    work page 2011

  50. [50]

    Pipeline in-line inspection method, instrumentation and data management.Sensors, 21(11):3862, 2021

    QiupingMa,GuiyunTian,YanliZeng,RuiLi,HuadongSong,ZhenWang,BinGao,andKunZeng. Pipeline in-line inspection method, instrumentation and data management.Sensors, 21(11):3862, 2021

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Electromagneticinduction imaging with a radio-frequency atomic magnetometer.Applied Physics Letters, 108(10):103503, 2016

    CameronDeans,LucaMarmugi,SarahHussain,andFerruccioRenzoni. Electromagneticinduction imaging with a radio-frequency atomic magnetometer.Applied Physics Letters, 108(10):103503, 2016

    work page 2016

  52. [53]

    Bevington, R

    P. Bevington, R. Gartman, and W. Chalupczak. Inductive imaging of the concealed defects with radio-frequency atomic magnetometers.Applied Sciences, 10(19):6871, 2020

    work page 2020

  53. [54]

    DNV-RP-G109: risk-based management of corrosion under insulation (CUI), 2019

    DNV. DNV-RP-G109: risk-based management of corrosion under insulation (CUI), 2019. Published Dec. 2019; accessed 2026-02-06

    work page 2019

  54. [55]

    A review of corrosion under insulation: a critical issue in the oil and gas industry.Metals, 12(4):561, 2022

    Qing Cao, Thunyaluk Pojtanabuntoeng, Marco Esmaily, Sebastian Thomas, Michael Brameld, Ayman Amer, and Nick Birbilis. A review of corrosion under insulation: a critical issue in the oil and gas industry.Metals, 12(4):561, 2022

    work page 2022

  55. [56]

    Non-destructive structural imaging of steelwork with atomic magnetometers

    Patrick Bevington, Rafal Gartman, Witold Chalupczak, Cameron Deans, Luca Marmugi, and Ferruccio Renzoni. Non-destructive structural imaging of steelwork with atomic magnetometers. Applied Physics Letters, 113(6):063503, 2018. 35

    work page 2018

  56. [57]

    Imaging corrosion under insulation with a mechanically-translatable atomic magnetometer

    Benjamin Maddox, Yuval Cohen, and Ferruccio Renzoni. Imaging corrosion under insulation with a mechanically-translatable atomic magnetometer. In2022 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT), pages 104–108. IEEE, 2022

    work page 2022

  57. [58]

    Magnetic mechanisms of magnetic flux leakage nondestructive testing.Applied Physics Letters, 103(18):184104, 2013

    Yanhua Sun and Yihua Kang. Magnetic mechanisms of magnetic flux leakage nondestructive testing.Applied Physics Letters, 103(18):184104, 2013

    work page 2013

  58. [59]

    L. Q. Zhou, R. L. Patel, A. C. Frangeskou, A. Nikitin, Ben L. Green, B. G. Breeze, S. Onoda, J. Isoya, and G. W. Morley. Imaging damage in steel using a diamond magnetometer.Physical Review Applied, 15(2):024015, 2021

    work page 2021

  59. [60]

    A. J. Newman, S. M. Graham, A. M. Edmonds, D. J. Twitchen, M. L. Markham, and G. W. Morley. Tensor gradiometry with a diamond magnetometer.Physical Review Applied, 21(1):014003, 2024

    work page 2024

  60. [61]

    High-resolution non-destructive detection of grinding burns with NV diamond quantum magnetometer.NDT & E International, 155:103439, 2025

    Baptiste Vindolet, Benjamin Ducharne, Hoai Nam Nguyen, Xavier Mougenot, Christophe Gallais, and Thomas Hingant. High-resolution non-destructive detection of grinding burns with NV diamond quantum magnetometer.NDT & E International, 155:103439, 2025

    work page 2025

  61. [62]

    Areviewofmetalmagneticmem- ory technology in civil engineering.Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 603:172231, 2024

    SanqingSu,XinweiLiu,WeiWang,JuntingLi,andRuizeDeng. Areviewofmetalmagneticmem- ory technology in civil engineering.Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 603:172231, 2024

    work page 2024

  62. [63]

    Magneticfieldsinducedbyelectrochemicalreactions: aluminumalloycorrosionsensingbySQUID magnetometryonamacroscopicscale.TheJournalofPhysicalChemistryB,106(48):12549–12555, 2002

    YuPeiMa,JohnP.Wikswo,MeiluteSamuleviciene,KonstantinasLeinartas,andEimutisJuzeliunas. Magneticfieldsinducedbyelectrochemicalreactions: aluminumalloycorrosionsensingbySQUID magnetometryonamacroscopicscale.TheJournalofPhysicalChemistryB,106(48):12549–12555, 2002

    work page 2002

  63. [64]

    Bautin, Ilya V

    Vasily A. Bautin, Ilya V. Bardin, Nikita S. Kholodkov, Sergey A. Gudoshnikov, Nikolai A. Usov, and Evangelos V. Hristoforou. In situ giant-magnetoimpedance magnetometer measurement of weak magnetic fields produced by pitting corrosion on AISI 304 stainless steel surface.Surfaces and Interfaces, 23:100993, 2021

    work page 2021

  64. [65]

    The non-destructivetestofsteelcorrosioninreinforcedconcretebridgesusingamicro-magneticsensor

    Hong Zhang, Leng Liao, Ruiqiang Zhao, Jianting Zhou, Mao Yang, and Runchuan Xia. The non-destructivetestofsteelcorrosioninreinforcedconcretebridgesusingamicro-magneticsensor. Sensors, 16(9):1439, 2016

    work page 2016

  65. [66]

    Quantitative evaluation of corrosion degrees of steel bars based on self-magnetic flux leakage.Metals, 9(9):952, 2019

    Ding Yang, Junli Qiu, Haibo Di, Siyu Zhao, Jianting Zhou, and Feixiong Yang. Quantitative evaluation of corrosion degrees of steel bars based on self-magnetic flux leakage.Metals, 9(9):952, 2019

    work page 2019

  66. [67]

    Quantitative study on corrosion of steel strands based on self-magnetic flux leakage.Sensors, 18(5):1396, 2018

    Runchuan Xia, Jianting Zhou, Hong Zhang, Leng Liao, Ruiqiang Zhao, and Zeyu Zhang. Quantitative study on corrosion of steel strands based on self-magnetic flux leakage.Sensors, 18(5):1396, 2018

    work page 2018

  67. [68]

    Iso 24497-1:2020 non-destructive testing — metal magnetic memory — part 1: Vocabulary and general requirements, 2020

    International Organization for Standardization. Iso 24497-1:2020 non-destructive testing — metal magnetic memory — part 1: Vocabulary and general requirements, 2020. International Standard; https://www.iso.org/standard/72146.html

    work page 2020

  68. [69]

    Iso 24497-2:2020 non-destructive testing — metal magnetic memory — part 2: General requirements for welded joints, 2020

    International Organization for Standardization. Iso 24497-2:2020 non-destructive testing — metal magnetic memory — part 2: General requirements for welded joints, 2020. International Standard; https://www.iso.org/standard/72147.html

    work page 2020

  69. [70]

    Design and experimental validation of MMM-based pipeline stress concentration detection system.Results in Engineering, 27:106834, 2025

    Deng Gong, Lunwu Zhao, and Gang Han. Design and experimental validation of MMM-based pipeline stress concentration detection system.Results in Engineering, 27:106834, 2025

    work page 2025

  70. [71]

    Z. D. Wang, K. Yao, B. Deng, and K. Q. Ding. Quantitative study of metal magnetic memory signal versus local stress concentration.NDT & E International, 43(6):513–518, 2010. 36

    work page 2010

  71. [72]

    Amagnetomechanicalmodelforthemagneticmemory method.International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 124–125:229–241, 2017

    PengpengShi, KeJin, andXiaojingZheng. Amagnetomechanicalmodelforthemagneticmemory method.International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 124–125:229–241, 2017

    work page 2017

  72. [73]

    Siriwardane, and Dimitrios Pavlou

    Fredrik Bjørheim, Sudath C. Siriwardane, and Dimitrios Pavlou. A review of fatigue damage detection and measurement techniques.International Journal of Fatigue, 154:106556, 2022

    work page 2022

  73. [74]

    David C. Jiles. Theory of the magnetomechanical effect.Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 28(8):1537–1546, 1995

    work page 1995

  74. [75]

    Marcelo J. Dapino. On magnetostrictive materials and their use in adaptive structures.Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 17(3–4):303–329, 2004

    work page 2004

  75. [76]

    Barkhausen noise probes and modelling: a review.Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 38:94, 2019

    Suvi Santa-aho, Arttu Laitinen, Aki Sorsa, and Minnamari Vippola. Barkhausen noise probes and modelling: a review.Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 38:94, 2019

    work page 2019

  76. [77]

    Sheng Bao and S. F. Gong. Magnetomechanical behavior for assessment of fatigue process in ferromagnetic steel.Journal of Applied Physics, 112(11):113902, 2012

    work page 2012

  77. [78]

    Koss, Ali Riza Durmaz, Andreas Blug, Gennadii Laskin, Omkar Satish Pawar, Ker- stin Thiemann, Alexander Bertz, Thomas Straub, and Christian Els"asser

    Peter A. Koss, Ali Riza Durmaz, Andreas Blug, Gennadii Laskin, Omkar Satish Pawar, Ker- stin Thiemann, Alexander Bertz, Thomas Straub, and Christian Els"asser. Optically pumped magnetometer measuring fatigue-induced damage in steel.Applied Sciences, 12(3):1329, 2022

    work page 2022

  78. [79]

    Broadway, B

    David A. Broadway, B. C. Johnson, M. S. J. Barson, Scott E. Lillie, Nikolai Dontschuk, D. J. McCloskey, Alexander Tsai, Tokuyuki Teraji, D. A. Simpson, Alastair Stacey, et al. Microscopic imaging of the stress tensor in diamond using in situ quantum sensors.Nano Letters, 19(7):4543– 4550, 2019

    work page 2019

  79. [80]

    Kehayias, M

    P. Kehayias, M. J. Turner, R. Trubko, J. M. Schloss, C. A. Hart, M. Wesson, D. R. Glenn, and R. L. Walsworth. Imaging crystal stress in diamond using ensembles of nitrogen-vacancy centers. Physical Review B, 100(17):174103, 2019

    work page 2019

  80. [81]

    Magnetic sensing and metrology, 2023

    National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Magnetic sensing and metrology, 2023. Accessed 2026-02-06

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.