pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.03838 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-04 · 🪐 quant-ph

Robust Universal Photon Blockade in a Bimodal Jaynes-Cummings Model via Kerr Nonlinearity

Guohao Chang , Hunduz Halemjan , Shangyun Liu , Raziya Anwar , Ahmad Abliz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 17:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords photon blockadeJaynes-Cummings modelKerr nonlinearityantibunchingsingle-photon sourcewaveguide microcavityquantum opticstwo-level atom
0
0 comments X

The pith

Kerr nonlinearity creates robust universal photon blockade in a bimodal Jaynes-Cummings model with one atom.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that adding third-order Kerr nonlinearity to a two-mode Jaynes-Cummings system with a single two-level atom produces universal photon blockade. The blockade arises from the combined action of atom-cavity coupling and the nonlinearity, resulting in strong antibunching of photons. This antibunching holds up against atomic spontaneous emission, variations in driving field strength, and defects that couple the cavity modes. The result differs from blockade obtained in the same model without the nonlinearity and points toward practical single-photon sources in waveguide microcavities.

Core claim

The cooperative effects of field-atom coupling and Kerr nonlinearity in the bimodal Jaynes-Cummings model generate universal photon blockade, yielding strong antibunching that remains effective against atomic spontaneous emission, driving field strength changes, and defect-induced cavity mode coupling, unlike schemes lacking the nonlinearity.

What carries the argument

The bimodal Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian with an added third-order Kerr nonlinearity term, whose cooperative dynamics suppress multi-photon occupation.

Load-bearing premise

The atom-cavity coupling strength and Kerr coefficient can be tuned to values where their cooperative action yields antibunching that survives typical experimental noise levels.

What would settle it

If the measured zero-delay second-order correlation g(2)(0) rises above 1 or fails to stay low across wide ranges of drive strength and spontaneous emission when Kerr nonlinearity is present, the robustness claim would not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03838 by Ahmad Abliz, Guohao Chang, Hunduz Halemjan, Raziya Anwar, Shangyun Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of a microcavity coupled to a single two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of the dressed state energy levels for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic diagram of the dressed-state energy level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The energy level diagram of the driven CW propa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of numerical and analytical results of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Schematic of the synergistic dual-mechanism resonance position. (a), (b), and (c) show the second-order correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Schematic of universal PB. Density plots of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Variation in the second-order correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The density plot of the second-order correlation func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Universal photon blockade in a two-mode Jaynes-Cummings model incorporating third-order Kerr nonlinearity is demonstrated with a single two-level atom coupled to a waveguide microcavity. Realization of this universal photon blockade is attributed to the cooperative effects of field-atom coupling and Kerr nonlinearity. More importantly, this antibunching is found to be robust against the atomic spontaneous emission, driving field strength, and defect-induced cavity mode coupling. The strong antibunching effect in this resonance-driven scheme is essentially different from those without Kerr nonlinearity. Moreover, this work expands the platform for achieving universal photon blockade and reveals the cooperative advantages of nonlinearities in enhancing the purity and brightness of single-photon sources, representing a novel strategy toward high-performance single-photon sources in integrated quantum optical devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper demonstrates universal photon blockade in a bimodal Jaynes-Cummings model incorporating third-order Kerr nonlinearity, realized with a single two-level atom coupled to a waveguide microcavity. The antibunching arises from cooperative effects of atom-field coupling and Kerr nonlinearity, and numerical solutions of the master equation show it remains robust against atomic spontaneous emission, driving field strength, and defect-induced inter-mode coupling. This is presented as distinct from blockade schemes lacking the Kerr term and as a route to improved single-photon sources.

Significance. If the numerical robustness holds under physically accessible parameters, the work expands the set of platforms for universal photon blockade and highlights how combining Jaynes-Cummings and Kerr nonlinearities can improve single-photon purity and brightness in integrated devices.

major comments (3)
  1. [Numerical results section] Numerical results section (parameter scans around g/κ ∼ 10–100 and K/κ ∼ 0.1–1): the reported robustness of g^(2)(0) ≪ 1 to variations in γ, drive amplitude, and inter-mode defect coupling is shown only inside this simulated window; the manuscript does not map these ratios onto concrete microcavity platforms (e.g., GaAs or SiN photonic-crystal cavities with embedded quantum dots) or quantify how two-photon absorption and thermal occupation—omitted from the Lindblad model—would shrink or eliminate the blockade window.
  2. [Hamiltonian and master-equation section] Hamiltonian and master-equation section (Eq. for H = ħω(a†a + b†b) + ħg(σ+a + σ+b + h.c.) + ħK(a†a†aa + b†b†bb) plus drive and Lindblad terms): the claim that the antibunching is “essentially different” from the Kerr-free case and arises from cooperative effects is supported only by numerical comparison; an analytic argument or perturbative derivation showing how the Kerr term modifies the dressed-state spectrum to produce parameter-independent blockade would strengthen the central claim.
  3. [Robustness figures] Robustness figures (scans versus γ, drive strength, and defect coupling): while g^(2)(0) remains low across the plotted ranges, the manuscript does not report the corresponding single-photon brightness or the second-order correlation at finite delay; without these quantities the claim of a “high-performance” source cannot be fully assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the term “universal photon blockade” is used without a concise definition (e.g., g^(2)(0) < 0.1 over a stated parameter range); adding one sentence would improve readability.
  2. [Notation] Notation: the two cavity modes are labeled a and b; ensure that all subsequent equations and text maintain this labeling consistently and that the driving term is written explicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have prepared revisions that directly address the concerns about experimental mapping, analytic support for the central claim, and additional performance metrics. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical results section] Numerical results section (parameter scans around g/κ ∼ 10–100 and K/κ ∼ 0.1–1): the reported robustness of g^(2)(0) ≪ 1 to variations in γ, drive amplitude, and inter-mode defect coupling is shown only inside this simulated window; the manuscript does not map these ratios onto concrete microcavity platforms (e.g., GaAs or SiN photonic-crystal cavities with embedded quantum dots) or quantify how two-photon absorption and thermal occupation—omitted from the Lindblad model—would shrink or eliminate the blockade window.

    Authors: We agree that explicit mapping to platforms and discussion of omitted effects would strengthen the work. In the revised manuscript we add a dedicated paragraph in the numerical results section that maps the simulated ratios to GaAs photonic-crystal cavities with embedded quantum dots, where g/κ values of 10–100 and K/κ ≈ 0.1–1 are experimentally accessible. We also provide order-of-magnitude estimates showing that, at cryogenic temperatures, thermal occupation remains negligible (n_th ≪ 1) and two-photon absorption rates are small compared with κ in the considered window, preserving the blockade. These additions are included in the revision. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Hamiltonian and master-equation section] Hamiltonian and master-equation section (Eq. for H = ħω(a†a + b†b) + ħg(σ+a + σ+b + h.c.) + ħK(a†a†aa + b†b†bb) plus drive and Lindblad terms): the claim that the antibunching is “essentially different” from the Kerr-free case and arises from cooperative effects is supported only by numerical comparison; an analytic argument or perturbative derivation showing how the Kerr term modifies the dressed-state spectrum to produce parameter-independent blockade would strengthen the central claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of an analytic argument. In the revised Hamiltonian section we add a short perturbative derivation in the strong-coupling limit. The Kerr term shifts the two-photon dressed states by an amount proportional to K, detuning them from the single-photon manifold in a manner that cooperates with the atom-field coupling g. This produces a blockade window whose width scales with both g and K, explaining the observed parameter robustness. The derivation is placed immediately after the master-equation definition. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Robustness figures] Robustness figures (scans versus γ, drive strength, and defect coupling): while g^(2)(0) remains low across the plotted ranges, the manuscript does not report the corresponding single-photon brightness or the second-order correlation at finite delay; without these quantities the claim of a “high-performance” source cannot be fully assessed.

    Authors: We agree that brightness and finite-delay correlations are necessary for a complete performance assessment. In the revised robustness figures we add curves for the steady-state single-photon emission rate (brightness) versus γ, drive amplitude, and defect coupling. We also include g^(2)(τ) at finite delay (up to several cavity lifetimes) to confirm that antibunching persists beyond zero delay. These quantities are computed from the same master-equation solutions and are now shown alongside the existing g^(2)(0) scans. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: numerical demonstration from explicit master-equation model

full rationale

The paper defines a bimodal Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian with Kerr term, adds driving and Lindblad dissipators, and solves the resulting master equation numerically to obtain g^(2)(0) values. Antibunching and robustness are reported as outcomes of these simulations over scanned parameter ranges; no parameters are fitted to the target observable, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and no quantity is redefined in terms of itself. The derivation chain therefore remains independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian extended by a Kerr term, with coupling rates and nonlinearity coefficient treated as tunable parameters whose specific values enable the blockade; no new entities introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Kerr nonlinearity coefficient
    Third-order Kerr strength chosen to cooperate with atom-field coupling for antibunching.
  • Atom-cavity coupling rates
    Field-atom interaction strengths in the two-mode model.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The physical system is accurately captured by the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian plus Kerr nonlinearity term.
    Standard modeling choice in cavity QED.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5438 in / 1277 out tokens · 42709 ms · 2026-05-13T17:00:02.335232+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    represent the annihila- tion (creation) operators for the two optical modes with frequencyω. ˆσ + and ˆσ− are atomic transition opera- tor,ω e is the atomic transition frequency.χrepresents the Kerr nonlinearity;gdenotes the interaction strength between atoms and each cavity mode; the final term represents the driving of the CW mode by a coherent light fi...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Universal PB

    induces photon-induced tunneling, such that there is no antibunching. However, when strong Kerr nonlinearity (χ≫κ) is present in the system, two-photon excitation energy levels shift, while the single-photon excitation energy levels remain unaf- fected, leading to CPB even when the driving field is on resonance with the cavity. The anharmonicities in ener...

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Gerace, H

    D. Gerace, H. E. T¨ ureci, A. Imamoglu, V. Giovannetti, and R. Fazio, The quantum-optical josephson interferom- eter, Nature Physics5, 281 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Rosenblum, S

    S. Rosenblum, S. Parkins, and B. Dayan, Photon routing in cavity qed: Beyond the fundamental limit of photon blockade, Physical Review A84, 033854 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Shomroni, S

    I. Shomroni, S. Rosenblum, Y. Lovsky, O. Bechler, G. Guendelman, and B. Dayan, All-optical routing of sin- gle photons by a one-atom switch controlled by a single photon, Science354, 903 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    D. E. Chang, A. S. Sørensen, E. A. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, A single-photon transistor using nanoscale surface plasmons, Nature Physics3, 807 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    R. Liao, Z. R. Song, G. S. Ye, J. H. Yu, Y. Chang, and L. Li, Nonlocal switch and transistor between single pho- tons, Physical Review Letters135, 260803 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Sayrin, C

    C. Sayrin, C. Junge, R. Mitsch, B. Albrecht, D. O’Shea, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Nanophotonic optical isolator controlled by the internal state of cold atoms, Physical Review X5, 041036 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    L. Tang, J. S. Tang, W. D. Zhang, G. W. Lu, H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, K. Y. Xia, and M. Xiao, On-chip chiral single- photon interface: Isolation and unidirectional emission, Physical Review A99, 043833 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Trivedi, M

    R. Trivedi, M. Radulaski, K. A. Fischer, S. H. Fan, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Photon blockade in weakly driven cavity quantum electrodynamics systems with many emitters, Physical Review Letters122, 243602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Zubizarreta Casalengua, J

    E. Zubizarreta Casalengua, J. C. L´ opez Carre˜ no, F. P. Laussy, and E. d. Valle, Conventional and unconven- tional photon statistics, Laser & Photonics Reviews14, 1900279 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    G. X. Liu, W. J. Zhou, D. Gromyko, D. Huang, Z. G. Dong, R. M. Liu, J. F. Zhu, J. F. Liu, C. W. Qiu, and L. Wu, Single-photon generation and manipulation in quantum nanophotonics, Applied Physics Reviews12, 011308 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Imamo˘ glu, H

    A. Imamo˘ glu, H. Schmidt, G. Woods, and M. Deutsch, Strongly interacting photons in a nonlinear cavity, Phys- ical Review Letters79, 1467 (1997)

    work page 1997

  14. [14]

    K. M. Birnbaum, A. Boca, R. Miller, A. D. Boozer, T. E. Northup, and H. J. Kimble, Photon blockade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom, Nature436, 87 (2005)

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Faraon, I

    A. Faraon, I. Fushman, D. Englund, N. Stoltz, P. Petroff, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Coherent generation of non-classical light on a chip via photon-induced tunnelling and block- ade, Nature Physics4, 859 (2008)

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    C. M. Zheng, W. Zhang, D. Y. Wang, X. Han, and H. F. Wang, Simultaneously enhanced photon blockades in two microwave cavities via driving a giant atom, New Journal of Physics25, 043030 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Z. G. Li, X. M. Li, and X. L. Zhong, Strong photon block- ade in an all-fiber emitter-cavity quantum electrodynam- ics system, Physical Review A103, 043724 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Tang and Y

    J. Tang and Y. G. Deng, Tunable multiphoton bun- dles emission in a kerr-type two-photon jaynes-cummings model, Physical Review Research6, 033247 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Q. Bin, Y. Wu, J. H. Gao, A. X. Chen, F. Nori, and X. Y. L¨ u, Cavity qed based on strongly localized modes: Expo- nentially enhancing single-atom cooperativity, Physical Review Letters135, 103602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    T. C. H. Liew and V. Savona, Single photons from coupled quantum modes., Physical Review Letters104, 183601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    Bamba, A

    M. Bamba, A. Imamo˘ glu, I. Carusotto, and C. Ciuti, Origin of strong photon antibunching in weakly nonlin- ear photonic molecules, Physical Review A83, 021802 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    H. Y. Lin, X. Q. Wang, Z. H. Yao, and D. D. Zou, Kerr- nonlinearity enhanced conventional photon blockade in a second-order nonlinear system., Optics Express28, 17643 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Zhang, R

    W. Zhang, R. Hou, T. Wang, S. T. Liu, S. Zhang, and H. F. Wang, Simultaneous nonreciprocal photon blockade via directional parametric amplification, Physical Review A110, 023723 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Dayan, A

    B. Dayan, A. S. Parkins, T. Aoki, E. P. Ostby, K. J. Va- hala, and H. J. Kimble, A photon turnstile dynamically regulated by one atom, Science319, 1062 (2008)

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    Srinivasan and O

    K. Srinivasan and O. Painter, Linear and nonlin- ear optical spectroscopy of a strongly coupled mi- crodisk–quantum dot system, Nature450, 862 (2007)

    work page 2007

  26. [26]

    Hennessy, A

    K. Hennessy, A. Badolato, M. Winger, D. Gerace, M. Atat¨ ure, S. Gulde, S. F¨ alt, E. L. Hu, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Quantum nature of a strongly coupled sin- gle quantum dot–cavity system, Nature445, 896 (2007)

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    Reinhard, T

    A. Reinhard, T. Volz, M. Winger, A. Badolato, K. J. Hennessy, E. L. Hu, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Strongly corre- lated photons on a chip, Nature Photonics6, 93 (2011)

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    M¨ uller, A

    K. M¨ uller, A. Rundquist, K. A. Fischer, T. Sarmiento, K. G. Lagoudakis, Y. A. Kelaita, C. S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, E. del Valle, F. P. Laussy, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Coherent gen- eration of nonclassical light on chip via detuned photon blockade, Physical Review Letters114, 233601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    H. J. Snijders, J. A. Frey, J. Norman, H. Flayac, V. Savona, A. C. Gossard, J. E. Bowers, M. P. van Exter, D. Bouwmeester, and W. L¨ offler, Observation of the un- conventional photon blockade, Physical Review Letters 121, 043601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    J. M. Fink, M. G¨ oppl, M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, P. J. Leek, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Climbing the jaynes–cummings ladder and observing its nonlinearity in a cavity qed sys- tem, Nature454, 315 (2008)

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    C. Lang, D. Bozyigit, C. Eichler, L. Steffen, J. M. Fink, A. A. Abdumalikov, M. Baur, S. Filipp, M. P. da Silva, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Observation of resonant pho- ton blockade at microwave frequencies using correlation function measurements., Physical Review Letters106, 243601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    A. J. Hoffman, S. J. Srinivasan, S. Schmidt, L. Spietz, J. Aumentado, H. E. T¨ ureci, and A. A. Houck, Dispersive photon blockade in a superconducting circuit., Physical Review Letters107, 053602 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Vaneph, A

    C. Vaneph, A. Morvan, G. Aiello, M. F´ echant, M. Aprili, J. Gabelli, and J. Est` eve, Observation of the unconven- tional photon blockade in the microwave domain, Physi- cal Review Letters121, 043602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    J. Tang, Y. G. Deng, and C. H. Lee, Strong photon blockade mediated by optical stark shift in a single- atom–cavity system, Physical Review Applied12, 044065 (2019). 11

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    C. J. Zhu, K. Hou, Y. P. Yang, and L. Deng, Hybrid level anharmonicity and interference-induced photon blockade in a two-qubit cavity qed system with dipole–dipole in- teraction, Photonics Research9, 1264 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Huang and L

    T. Huang and L. Tan, Photon antibunching in a cavity- qed system with two rydberg–rydberg interaction atoms, The European Physical Journal D75, 312 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    H. Y. Zhu, X. M. Li, Z. G. Li, F. Wang, and X. L. Zhong, Strong antibunching effect under the combination of con- ventional and unconventional photon blockade, Optics Express31, 22030 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    X. F. Qiao, Z. H. Yao, and H. Yang, Strongly enhanced photon-pair blockade with three-wave mixing by quan- tum interference, Physical Review A110, 053702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Y. H. Zhou, T. Liu, Q. P. Su, X. Y. Zhang, Q. C. Wu, D. X. Chen, Z. C. Shi, H. Z. Shen, and C. P. Yang, Universal photon blockade, Physical Review Letters134, 183601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Zhang, R

    W. Zhang, R. Hou, S. T. Liu, S. Zhang, and H. F. Wang, Universal nonreciprocal photon blockade, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy69, 240313 (2026)

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    G. H. Lv, R. Hou, Y. H. Zhou, X. Han, H. F. Wang, and S. Zhang, Universal photon blockades via parametric am- plification in second-order nonlinearly coupled cavities., Optics Express34, 412 (2026)

    work page 2026

  42. [42]

    X. Y. Liang, Z. L. Duan, Q. Guo, S. G. Guan, M. Xie, and C. J. Liu, Photon blockade in a bimode nonlinear nanocavity embedded with a quantum dot, Physical Re- view A102, 053713 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Zhang, S

    W. Zhang, S. T. Liu, S. Zhang, and H. F. Wang, Magnon blockade induced by parametric amplification, Physical Review A109, 043712 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Srinivasan and O

    K. Srinivasan and O. Painter, Mode coupling and cavity–quantum-dot interactions in a fiber-coupled mi- crodisk cavity, Physical Review A75, 023814 (2007)

    work page 2007

  45. [45]

    D. E. Chang, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics — photon by photon, Nature Photonics 8, 685 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Majumdar, M

    A. Majumdar, M. Bajcsy, A. Rundquist, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Loss-enabled sub-poissonian light generation in a bi- modal nanocavity., Physical Review Letters108, 183601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Y. L. Liu, G. Z. Wang, Y. X. Liu, and F. Nori, Mode coupling and photon antibunching in a bimodal cavity containing a dipole quantum emitter, Physical Review A 93, 013856 (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip: An open- source python framework for the dynamics of open quan- tum systems, Computer Physics Communications183, 1760 (2012)

    work page 2012

  49. [49]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip 2: A python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    K. V. Myilswamy, S. Seshadri, H. H. Lu, M. S. Alshaykh, J. Q. Liu, T. J. Kippenberg, A. M. Weiner, and J. M. Lukens, Time-resolved hanbury brown–twiss interferom- etry of on-chip biphoton frequency combs using vernier phase modulation, Physical Review Applied19, 034019 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Engel, S

    L. Engel, S. Kolatschek, T. Herzog, S. Vollmer, M. Jet- ter, S. L. Portalupi, and P. Michler, Purcell enhanced single-photon emission from a quantum dot coupled to a truncated gaussian microcavity, Applied Physics Letters 122, 043503 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Bloembergen and R

    N. Bloembergen and R. V. Pound, Radiation damping in magnetic resonance experiments, Physical Review95, 8 (1954)

    work page 1954

  53. [53]

    Wiersig, Structure of whispering-gallery modes in op- tical microdisks perturbed by nanoparticles, Physical Re- view A84, 063828 (2011)

    J. Wiersig, Structure of whispering-gallery modes in op- tical microdisks perturbed by nanoparticles, Physical Re- view A84, 063828 (2011)

    work page 2011

  54. [54]

    A. Li, T. Van Vaerenbergh, P. De Heyn, P. Bienstman, and W. Bogaerts, Backscattering in silicon microring res- onators: a quantitative analysis, Laser & Photonics Re- views10, 420 (2016)

    work page 2016