pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04730 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Cyclic Heat Engine with the Ising model: role of interactions and criticality

Gustavo A. L. For\~ao , Arya Datta , Carlos E. Fiore , Andre C. Barato This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords Ising modelheat engineinteractionscriticalitymean-fieldpower and efficiencyphase transitionspontaneous magnetization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Interactions in the Ising model can enhance power and efficiency of cyclic heat engines and turn non-engines into engines.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a cyclic heat engine from the Ising model by varying temperature and magnetic field along a closed loop in parameter space. It shows that nonzero spin interactions increase both the extracted work per cycle and the efficiency relative to the non-interacting case. Systems that produce zero or negative net work without interactions become engines once the interaction strength is raised. In the mean-field version, spontaneous magnetization below the critical temperature lets the engine produce positive work even when one of the two magnetic fields is set to zero, and numerical maximization of work places the optimal cycle parameters at this regime.

Core claim

In both the one-dimensional and mean-field Ising models, the work and efficiency of the temperature-magnetic-field cycle increase with interaction strength. A parameter regime that yields no net work for non-interacting spins produces positive work once interactions are turned on. For the mean-field model, spontaneous magnetization allows the cycle to operate as an engine with one magnetic field identically zero; the parameters that maximize work lie in this regime and therefore explore the ferromagnetic phase transition.

What carries the argument

A closed thermodynamic cycle on the Ising Hamiltonian that consists of two isothermal and two isomagnetic legs, with net work obtained from the integral of magnetization changes with respect to the external field and heat from internal-energy differences.

If this is right

  • Increasing the interaction strength raises both power and efficiency for any fixed cycle period.
  • A non-interacting Ising system that produces no net work becomes an engine once the coupling is tuned above a threshold value.
  • The mean-field engine continues to produce positive work when one magnetic field is set to zero, owing to spontaneous magnetization.
  • Work is maximized when the cycle passes through the ferromagnetic phase transition.
  • Numerical results show that power falls monotonically as the cycle period is shortened from the quasi-static limit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same interaction-driven improvement could appear in other lattice models that possess a tunable coupling and a phase transition.
  • Varying the interaction strength itself, rather than the external field, offers a second protocol whose performance can be compared directly with the original cycle.
  • The observed optimality near criticality suggests that similar thermodynamic cycles in higher-dimensional or quantum spin systems might also benefit from operating close to their phase boundaries.

Load-bearing premise

The analytical expressions hold only in the quasi-static limit of very large cycle periods, and finite-period corrections are assumed not to reverse the reported gains from interactions or the location of the optimum near the phase transition.

What would settle it

A finite-time simulation of the mean-field cycle in which work no longer increases with interaction strength or peaks away from the zero-field, critical-temperature point.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04730 by Andre C. Barato, Arya Datta, Carlos E. Fiore, Gustavo A. L. For\~ao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Cyclic protocol for the Ising model. The thermodynamic parameters are the inverse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Contour plots for the 1D model in the 𝐻2 × 𝐽 plane. (a) Work 𝑊. (b) Efficiency 𝜂. The remaining parameters are set to 𝛽ℎ = 0.1 and 𝐻1 = 1. strength 𝐽, for a fixed value of 𝛽ℎ ≤ 1. We denote the corresponding maximum work by 𝑊∗ , and the associated efficiency—referred to as the efficiency at maximum power—by 𝜂 ∗ . These results are compared to the maximum work obtained for 𝐽 = 0, optimized with respect to 𝐻… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Efficiency at maximum power for the 1D model. (a) Efficiency at maximum power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Contour plots for the MF model in the 𝐻2 × 𝐽 plane. (a) Work 𝑊. (b) Efficiency 𝜂. The other parameters are set to 𝛽ℎ = 0.1 and 𝐻1 = 1. 3.2. Heat engine with the MF Ising model For the MF model, we likewise observe that interactions can enhance both the work output and the efficiency of the engine, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Efficiency at maximum power for the MF model. (a) Efficiency at maximum power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Results for the cycle with varying interaction strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Power 𝑃 as a function of the period 𝜏 obtained from numerical simulations. The inverse hot temperature is 𝛽ℎ = 0.5. The kinetic rate is 𝑘 = 1, and the time step is 𝛿𝑡 = 0.01/(2𝑁). In all panels, the red solid line corresponds to 𝑊/𝜏, where the work 𝑊 is computed from the analytical expressions. Agreement with numerical results is observed for sufficiently large 𝜏. (a) 𝐻1 = 1, 𝐻2 = 2, 𝐽 = 1, 𝑁 = 200. (b) 𝐻1… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Heat engines that convert thermal energy into work are a cornerstone of classical thermodynamics and remain an active area of contemporary research. Notable examples include microscopic heat engines, trade-off relations between power and efficiency, and the attainability of Carnot efficiency at finite power. We propose a cyclic heat engine based on the Ising model, in which the thermodynamic cycle involves variations of both temperature and magnetic field. We analyze the one-dimensional and mean-field Ising models, which allow for simple analytical results and provide new insight into the role of interactions in cyclic heat engines. In particular, we show that interactions can enhance both power and efficiency. Moreover, a system that does not operate as an engine in the absence of interactions can become an engine upon tuning the interaction strength. The mean-field model enables us to investigate the relevance of the phase transition for the performance of this Ising heat engine. Owing to the emergence of spontaneous magnetization, the mean-field model can still operate as an engine even when one of the magnetic fields is set to zero. Remarkably, when the work is maximized, we find that the optimal parameters are numerically consistent with this regime, in which one magnetic field vanishes and the cycle explores the phase transition. We also consider an alternative cycle for the mean-field model, obtained by varying the interaction strength while keeping both temperatures below the critical temperature and setting the magnetic field to zero throughout the cycle. The power and efficiency of this cycle are analyzed as well. Finally, while our analytical results are valid for the limit of large period we use numerical simulations for finite periods and show that the power decreases monotonically with the period.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a cyclic heat engine based on the Ising model with thermodynamic cycles that vary both temperature and magnetic field. Analytical expressions are derived for the one-dimensional and mean-field Ising models in the quasi-static (large-period) limit, showing that interactions can enhance power and efficiency, that tuning the interaction strength J can turn a non-engine into an engine, and that the mean-field model can operate as an engine with one magnetic field set to zero due to spontaneous magnetization. Work maximization occurs at parameters numerically consistent with exploring the phase transition. An alternative cycle varying interaction strength (with B=0 and both temperatures below Tc) is also analyzed. Numerical simulations for finite periods show only that power decreases monotonically with period.

Significance. If the results hold, the work offers clear analytical insights from exactly solvable models into how interactions and criticality influence power and efficiency in microscopic heat engines. The derivations for 1D and mean-field cases, plus the demonstration that a non-engine can become an engine via J, provide concrete examples of interaction effects that could inform broader studies of trade-offs in finite-time thermodynamics.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical simulations for finite periods] Numerical simulations for finite periods (final paragraph of abstract and corresponding section): these only establish that power decreases monotonically with increasing period. No data or analysis is provided to check whether the reported interaction-driven enhancements to power and efficiency, the transition from non-engine to engine upon tuning J, or the optimality near B=0 and the mean-field phase transition survive at finite periods, where non-quasistatic effects, hysteresis, or critical slowing down could change the ordering or location of the optimum. This verification gap is load-bearing because the headline claims are derived in the quasi-static limit.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Analytical derivations] Clarify the precise definitions of power (work per unit time) and efficiency (work over heat input) used in the analytical expressions and how they are computed from the partition functions or free energies.
  2. [Mean-field analysis] In the discussion of the mean-field case with B=0, explicitly state the condition under which the cycle still yields positive net work (e.g., via the spontaneous magnetization contribution to the free-energy difference).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to clarify the scope of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Numerical simulations for finite periods (final paragraph of abstract and corresponding section): these only establish that power decreases monotonically with increasing period. No data or analysis is provided to check whether the reported interaction-driven enhancements to power and efficiency, the transition from non-engine to engine upon tuning J, or the optimality near B=0 and the mean-field phase transition survive at finite periods, where non-quasistatic effects, hysteresis, or critical slowing down could change the ordering or location of the optimum. This verification gap is load-bearing because the headline claims are derived in the quasi-static limit.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical simulations are limited and serve only to demonstrate the monotonic decrease of power with increasing period. Our primary contributions are the exact analytical expressions derived for the quasi-static (large-period) limit in both the 1D and mean-field Ising models. In that limit we rigorously show the interaction-induced enhancements to power and efficiency, the tuning of J that converts a non-engine into an engine, and the mean-field operation at zero field enabled by spontaneous magnetization, with work maximization occurring near the phase transition. The finite-period simulations were not intended to re-verify these qualitative features under non-quasistatic conditions. We will revise the abstract and the relevant section to state explicitly that all claims concerning interaction effects and criticality apply strictly to the quasi-static regime, while the numerical results illustrate only the expected period dependence. This clarification addresses the concern without new computations, as the work's focus remains the exactly solvable quasi-static cases. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results follow from standard Ising free-energy calculations in quasi-static limit

full rationale

The derivation chain uses the exact partition function for the 1D Ising model and the mean-field self-consistency equation to obtain work and efficiency as functions of temperature, field, and interaction strength. These are standard thermodynamic expressions; no target performance metric is used as an input to define or fit any quantity that is later called a prediction. The statement that optimal parameters are numerically consistent with B=0 is an output of maximizing the derived work expression, not an imposed condition. Finite-period numerics are invoked only to show monotonic power decrease and do not enter the analytical claims. No self-citations, ansatze smuggled via prior work, or renaming of known results appear as load-bearing steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard Ising Hamiltonian and its exact/mean-field solutions; interaction strength is treated as a tunable parameter rather than fitted to engine data.

free parameters (1)
  • interaction strength J
    Tuned across values to demonstrate enhancement and engine activation; not fitted to performance data but explored parametrically.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Ising model Hamiltonian with nearest-neighbor interactions and external field
    Standard statistical-mechanics model invoked for both 1D exact solution and mean-field approximation.
  • domain assumption Quasi-static (large-period) limit for analytical power and efficiency
    Explicitly stated as the regime for closed-form results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5604 in / 1431 out tokens · 125280 ms · 2026-05-10T19:42:37.551679+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We propose a cyclic heat engine based on the Ising model... interactions can enhance both power and efficiency... mean-field model can still operate as an engine even when one of the magnetic fields is set to zero... power decreases monotonically with the period.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Efficiency of a Carnot engine at maximum power output,

    F. L. Curzon and B. Ahlborn, “Efficiency of a Carnot engine at maximum power output,”Am. J. Phys.43 (1975) 22

    work page 1975

  2. [2]

    Finite-time thermodynamics - optimal expansion of a heated working fluid,

    Y. B. Band, O. Kafri, and P. Salamon, “Finite-time thermodynamics - optimal expansion of a heated working fluid,”J. Appl. Phys.53(1982) 8

    work page 1982

  3. [3]

    Thermodynamics in finite time,

    B. Andresen, P. Salamon, and R. S. Berry, “Thermodynamics in finite time,”Physics Today37(9)(1984) 62

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Thermal efficiency at maximum work output: New results for old heat engines,

    H. S. Leff, “Thermal efficiency at maximum work output: New results for old heat engines,”Am. J. Phys. 55(1987) 602

    work page 1987

  5. [5]

    Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems, and molecular machines,

    U. Seifert, “Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems, and molecular machines,”Rep. Prog. Phys. 75(2012) 126001

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Thermodynamic efficiency at maximum power,

    C. van den Broeck, “Thermodynamic efficiency at maximum power,”Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 190602

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    Tight coupling in thermal Brownian motors,

    A. Gomez-Marin and J. M. Sancho, “Tight coupling in thermal Brownian motors,”Phys. Rev. E74(2006) 062102

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Efficiency of molecular motors at maximum power,

    T. Schmiedl and U. Seifert, “Efficiency of molecular motors at maximum power,”EPL83(2008) 30005

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Universality of efficiency at maximum power,

    M. Esposito, K. Lindenberg, and C. van den Broeck, “Universality of efficiency at maximum power,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102(2009) 130602

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    Thermoelectric efficiency at maximum power in a quantum dot,

    M. Esposito, K. Lindenberg, and C. van den Broeck, “Thermoelectric efficiency at maximum power in a quantum dot,”Europhys. Lett.85(2009) 60010

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    Efficiency at maximum power: An analytically solvable model for stochastic heat engines,

    T. Schmiedl and U. Seifert, “Efficiency at maximum power: An analytically solvable model for stochastic heat engines,”EPL81(2008) 20003

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Quantum-dot Carnot engine at maximum power,

    M. Esposito, R. Kawai, K. Lindenberg, and C. van den Broeck, “Quantum-dot Carnot engine at maximum power,”Phys. Rev. E81(2010) 041106

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    Efficiency at maximal power of minimal nonlinear irreversible heat engines,

    Y. Izumida and K. Okuda, “Efficiency at maximal power of minimal nonlinear irreversible heat engines,” EPL97(2012) 10004

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Stochastic heat engine with the consideration of inertial effects and shortcuts to adiabaticity,

    Z. C. Tu, “Stochastic heat engine with the consideration of inertial effects and shortcuts to adiabaticity,” Phys. Rev. E89(2014) 052148

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Thermodynamics of micro- and nano-systems driven by periodic temperature variations,

    K. Brandner, K. Saito, and U. Seifert, “Thermodynamics of micro- and nano-systems driven by periodic temperature variations,”Phys. Rev. X5(2015) 031019

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Mimicking nonequilibrium steady states with time-periodic driving,

    O. Raz, Y. Subas ¸ı, and C. Jarzynski, “Mimicking nonequilibrium steady states with time-periodic driving,”Phys. Rev. X6(2016) 021022

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Stochastic thermodynamics of periodically driven systems: Fluctuation theorem for currents and unification of two classes,

    S. Ray and A. C. Barato, “Stochastic thermodynamics of periodically driven systems: Fluctuation theorem for currents and unification of two classes,”Phys. Rev. E96(2017) 052120

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Piezoresistive heat engine and refrigerator,

    P. Steeneken, K. Le Phan, M. Goossens, G. Koops, G. Brom, C. Van der Avoort, and J. Van Beek, “Piezoresistive heat engine and refrigerator,”Nat. Phys.7(2011) 354

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Realization of a micrometre-sized stochastic heat engine,

    V. Blickle and C. Bechinger, “Realization of a micrometre-sized stochastic heat engine,”Nat. Phys.8 (2012) 143

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Adiabatic processes realized with a trapped brownian particle,

    I. A. Mart ´ınez, E. Rold´an, L. Dinis, D. Petrov, and R. A. Rica, “Adiabatic processes realized with a trapped brownian particle,”Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 120601

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Brownian carnot engine,

    I. A. Mart ´ınez, ´E. Rold´an, L. Dinis, D. Petrov, J. M. Parrondo, and R. A. Rica, “Brownian carnot engine,” Nat. Phys.12(2016) 67

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    A single-atom heat engine,

    J. Roßnagel, S. T. Dawkins, K. N. Tolazzi, O. Abah, E. Lutz, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer, “A single-atom heat engine,”Science352(2016) 325–329

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Colloidal heat engines: a review,

    I. A. Martinez, E. Roldan, L. Dinis, and R. A. Rica, “Colloidal heat engines: a review,”Soft Matter13 (2017) 22–36

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    A micrometre-sized heat engine operating between bacterial reservoirs,

    S. Krishnamurthy, S. Ghosh, D. Chatterji, R. Ganapathy, and A. Sood, “A micrometre-sized heat engine operating between bacterial reservoirs,”Nat. Phys.12(2016) 1134–1138

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Stochastic stirling engine operating in contact with active baths,

    R. Zakine, A. Solon, T. Gingrich, and F. Van Wijland, “Stochastic stirling engine operating in contact with active baths,”Entropy19(2017) 193

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Stochastic work extraction in a colloidal heat engine in the presence of colored Cyclic Heat Engine with the Ising model: role of interactions and criticality16 noise,

    A. Saha and R. Marathe, “Stochastic work extraction in a colloidal heat engine in the presence of colored Cyclic Heat Engine with the Ising model: role of interactions and criticality16 noise,”J. Stat. Mech.(2019) 094012

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Autonomous engines driven by active matter: Energetics and design principles,

    P. Pietzonka, E. Fodor, C. Lohrmann, M. E. Cates, and U. Seifert, “Autonomous engines driven by active matter: Energetics and design principles,”Phys. Rev. X9(2019) 041032

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Thermodynamic cycles with active matter,

    T. Ekeh, M. E. Cates, and E. Fodor, “Thermodynamic cycles with active matter,”Phys. Rev. E102(Jul,

    work page

  29. [29]

    Active brownian heat engines,

    V. Holubec, S. Steffenoni, G. Falasco, and K. Kroy, “Active brownian heat engines,”Phys. Rev. Research2 (2020) 043262

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Underdamped active brownian heat engine,

    V. Holubec and R. Marathe, “Underdamped active brownian heat engine,”Phys. Rev. E102(2020) 060101

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Stochastic heat engine using an active particle,

    A. Kumari, P. S. Pal, A. Saha, and S. Lahiri, “Stochastic heat engine using an active particle,”Phys. Rev. E 101(2020) 032109

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Brownian heat engine with active reservoirs,

    J. S. Lee, J.-M. Park, and H. Park, “Brownian heat engine with active reservoirs,”Phys. Rev. E102(Sep,

    work page

  33. [33]

    Active engines: Thermodynamics moves forward,

    ´E. Fodor and M. E. Cates, “Active engines: Thermodynamics moves forward,”EPL134(2021) 10003

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Optimization of an active heat engine,

    G. Gronchi and A. Puglisi, “Optimization of an active heat engine,”Phys. Rev. E103(2021) 052134

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Second law for active heat engines,

    A. Datta, P. Pietzonka, and A. C. Barato, “Second law for active heat engines,”Phys. Rev. X12(Sep,

    work page

  36. [36]

    Colloidal heat engine driven by engineered active noise,

    J. A. C. Albay, Z.-Y. Zhou, C.-H. Chang, H.-Y. Chen, J. S. Lee, C.-H. Chang, and Y. Jun, “Colloidal heat engine driven by engineered active noise,”Phys. Rev. Res.5(2023) 033208

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Modeling the efficiency and effective temperature of bacterial heat engines,

    R. Wiese, K. Kroy, and V. Holubec, “Modeling the efficiency and effective temperature of bacterial heat engines,”Phys. Rev. E110(2024) 064608

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Carnot cycle at finite power: Attainability of maximal efficiency,

    A. E. Allahverdyan, K. V. Hovhannisyan, A. V. Melkikh, and S. G. Gevorkian, “Carnot cycle at finite power: Attainability of maximal efficiency,”Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 050601

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    The power of a critical heat engine,

    M. Campisi and R. Fazio, “The power of a critical heat engine,”Nat. Commun.7(2016) 1–5

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Carnot efficiency at divergent power output,

    M. Polettini and M. Esposito, “Carnot efficiency at divergent power output,”Europhysics Letters118 (2017) 40003

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Carnot efficiency is reachable in an irreversible process,

    J. S. Lee and H. Park, “Carnot efficiency is reachable in an irreversible process,”Sci. Rep.7(2017) 10725

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Optimal cycles for low-dissipation heat engines,

    P. Abiuso and M. Perarnau-Llobet, “Optimal cycles for low-dissipation heat engines,”Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 110606

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Minimal model for carnot efficiency at maximum power,

    S. Liang, Y.-H. Ma, D. M. Busiello, and P. De Los Rios, “Minimal model for carnot efficiency at maximum power,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 027101

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Universal trade-off relation between power and efficiency for heat engines,

    N. Shiraishi, K. Saito, and H. Tasaki, “Universal trade-off relation between power and efficiency for heat engines,”Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 190601

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Operationally accessible bounds on fluctuations and entropy production in periodically driven systems,

    T. Koyuk and U. Seifert, “Operationally accessible bounds on fluctuations and entropy production in periodically driven systems,”Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 230601

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Universal trade-off between power, efficiency and constancy in steady-state heat engines,

    P. Pietzonka and U. Seifert, “Universal trade-off between power, efficiency and constancy in steady-state heat engines,”Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 190602

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Thermodynamics of information,

    J. M. Parrondo, J. M. Horowitz, and T. Sagawa, “Thermodynamics of information,”Nat. Phys.11(2015) 131–139

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality,

    S. Toyabe, T. Sagawa, M. Ueda, E. Muneyuki, and M. Sano, “Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality,”Nature Phys.6 (2010) 988

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    Extracting work from a single heat bath through feedback,

    D. Abreu and U. Seifert, “Extracting work from a single heat bath through feedback,”Europhys. Lett.94 (2011) 10001

    work page 2011

  50. [50]

    Work and information processing in a solvable model of Maxwell’s demon,

    D. Mandal and C. Jarzynski, “Work and information processing in a solvable model of Maxwell’s demon,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.109(2012) 11641–11645

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    Thermodynamics of a physical model implementing a maxwell demon,

    P. Strasberg, G. Schaller, T. Brandes, and M. Esposito, “Thermodynamics of a physical model implementing a maxwell demon,”Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 040601

    work page 2013

  52. [52]

    Experimental observation of the role of mutual information in the nonequilibrium dynamics of a maxwell demon,

    J. V. Koski, V. F. Maisi, T. Sagawa, and J. P. Pekola, “Experimental observation of the role of mutual information in the nonequilibrium dynamics of a maxwell demon,”Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 030601

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Large work extraction and the landauer limit in a continuous maxwell demon,

    M. Ribezzi-Crivellari and F. Ritort, “Large work extraction and the landauer limit in a continuous maxwell demon,”Nat. Phys.15(2019) 660. Cyclic Heat Engine with the Ising model: role of interactions and criticality17

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    Colossal power extraction from active cyclic brownian information engines,

    G. Paneru, S. Dutta, and H. K. Pak, “Colossal power extraction from active cyclic brownian information engines,”J. Phys. Chem. Lett.13(2022) 6912–6918

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Szilard engines and information-based work extraction for active systems,

    P. Malgaretti and H. Stark, “Szilard engines and information-based work extraction for active systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 228005

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Information engine in a nonequilibrium bath,

    T. K. Saha, J. Ehrich, M. c. v. Gavrilov, S. Still, D. A. Sivak, and J. Bechhoefer, “Information engine in a nonequilibrium bath,”Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 057101

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Entropy-generated power and its efficiency,

    N. Golubeva, A. Imparato, and M. Esposito, “Entropy-generated power and its efficiency,”Phys. Rev. E88 (2013) 042115

    work page 2013

  58. [58]

    Collective effects enhancing power and efficiency,

    V. Vroylandt, M. Esposito, and G. Verley, “Collective effects enhancing power and efficiency,”EPL120 (2019) 30009

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Powerful ordered collective heat engines,

    F. S. Filho, G. A. L. For ˜ao, D. M. Busiello, B. Cleuren, and C. E. Fiore, “Powerful ordered collective heat engines,”Phys. Rev. Res.5(2023) 043067

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Characterization and optimization of heat engines: Pareto-optimal fronts and universal features,

    G. A. L. For ˜ao, J. Berx, and C. E. Fiore, “Characterization and optimization of heat engines: Pareto-optimal fronts and universal features,”New J. Phys.27(2025) 074605

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    R. J. Baxter,Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics. Academic Press, London, 1982

    work page 1982