pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05222 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.str-el

Valley polarization of chiral excitonic bound states induced by band geometry

Archisman Panigrahi , Daniel Kaplan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el
keywords excitonic pairingBerry phasevalley polarizationchiral statesangular momentumrhombohedral graphenetrigonal warpingvan der Waals materials
0
0 comments X

The pith

Berry flux in double-well bands favors finite-angular-momentum excitons that evolve into chiral states as the flux changes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This work explores the effect of Berry phase on excitonic bound states in dispersions that mimic layered van der Waals materials. Calculations of the temperature and Berry flux phase diagram reveal ranges where excitons with nonzero angular momentum, including chiral varieties, become the ground state. Unlike the hydrogen atom in a magnetic field, here the preferred angular momentum channel shifts with increasing Berry flux. In a specific model of multilayer rhombohedral graphene that includes trigonal warping, continuous rotational symmetry breaks and the lowest-energy excitons form linear combinations of s, p, f, and g angular momenta. These findings indicate that many-body condensation can produce chiral excitonic states and break symmetries spontaneously.

Core claim

The Berry flux reshapes excitonic pairing such that the condensed angular momentum channel evolves with the flux, producing chiral states without analogue in atomic hydrogen. With trigonal warping in rhombohedral graphene, excitons mix multiple angular momenta, yielding ground states that are linear combinations of s, p, f, and g channels for various parameters.

What carries the argument

The Berry-flux dependence of the lowest-energy excitonic angular momentum channel in a double-well dispersion.

If this is right

  • Excitons with finite angular momentum including chiral ones are stable in certain temperature and flux regimes.
  • The preferred angular momentum evolves continuously with Berry flux.
  • Trigonal warping mixes angular momenta, leading to hybrid s-p-f-g ground states.
  • Chiral excitonic condensates become possible, enabling spontaneous symmetry breaking.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Valley polarization of these chiral states could be detected through circularly polarized light emission.
  • Similar band geometry effects might stabilize chiral pairing in other topological semimetals or moire materials.
  • Strain or electric fields that tune the Berry flux could switch between different angular momentum condensates.
  • Many-body effects beyond mean-field may further stabilize or destabilize these mixed states.

Load-bearing premise

The double-well dispersion represents the essential band geometry of vdW systems and the pairing calculation captures the dominant physics without disorder or strong higher-order interactions.

What would settle it

If experiments on rhombohedral graphene multilayers show no evolution of exciton angular momentum with applied fields that control Berry flux, or if no mixed angular momentum states appear despite trigonal warping, the central claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05222 by Archisman Panigrahi, Daniel Kaplan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) A schematic of a chiral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Phase diagram for a single exciton in the Mex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Phase diagram of the excitonic condensate. (a) The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Phase diagram of a single exciton in tetralayer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Van der Waals (vdW) materials provide a rich platform for exploring the interplay of interactions, topology, and paired-electron phases. We study how the Berry phase reshapes excitonic pairing in a double-well dispersion representative of layered vdW systems. By computing the temperature-versus-Berry flux phase diagram of the system, we find parameter ranges where finite angular momentum excitons are favored, including chiral states. Strikingly, the condensed angular momentum channel evolves with Berry flux, revealing a pairing problem with no analogue in a hydrogen atom in a uniform magnetic field, where angular momentum states never cross. We then turn to a model of multilayer rhombohedral graphene and examine the effects of trigonal warping. Once continuous rotational symmetry is broken, excitons mix multiple angular momenta, and for a range of parameters we find a variety of linear combination of angular momenta ($s, p, f$ and $g$) in the ground state. Our results point to the possibility of chiral excitonic condensates, and spontaneous symmetry breaking through many-body condensation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines how Berry phase and band geometry influence excitonic pairing in a double-well dispersion model representative of vdW materials. Computing the temperature-versus-Berry-flux phase diagram reveals parameter regimes favoring finite-angular-momentum excitons, including chiral states. The condensed angular-momentum channel evolves with Berry flux, with no direct analogue in the hydrogen atom in a uniform magnetic field. Extending to multilayer rhombohedral graphene with trigonal warping, continuous rotational symmetry breaking mixes angular momenta, yielding ground states with linear combinations of s, p, f, and g channels for certain parameters. The results suggest possible chiral excitonic condensates and spontaneous symmetry breaking via many-body condensation.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work demonstrates a geometry-driven mechanism for chiral excitonic states and valley polarization in topological vdW systems, distinct from conventional magnetic-field analogues. The phase-diagram exploration and explicit treatment of trigonal warping provide concrete, falsifiable predictions for experiments in multilayer graphene, strengthening the case for many-body condensation phenomena induced by band geometry.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2] §2 (double-well dispersion): The claim that the double-well dispersion is representative of layered vdW systems is load-bearing for the phase diagram and angular-momentum evolution results, yet the model omits intervalley scattering and disorder terms that the later graphene section shows can qualitatively mix angular momenta; a quantitative estimate of their effect on the reported channel crossings is needed.
  2. [§3] §3 (phase-diagram computation): The numerical extraction of ground-state angular-momentum content and the temperature-Berry-flux boundaries lacks sufficient detail on the basis set, cutoff, or convergence criteria, making it impossible to verify that the reported s/p/f/g mixing and chiral condensation are robust rather than artifacts of the discretization.
  3. [§4] §4 (multilayer graphene): While trigonal warping is shown to mix angular momenta, the parameter range over which s+p+f+g combinations appear in the ground state is not delimited by a clear stability analysis against additional perturbations (e.g., intervalley scattering), weakening the link to spontaneous symmetry breaking.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption: the color scale for the phase diagram should explicitly state the quantity plotted (e.g., order-parameter magnitude or free-energy difference) to avoid ambiguity in identifying the chiral regions.
  2. [Eq. (3)] Notation: the definition of Berry flux (Eq. (3)) should be cross-referenced when discussing its effect on angular-momentum channel evolution in §3 to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped clarify and strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional details and analyses where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (double-well dispersion): The claim that the double-well dispersion is representative of layered vdW systems is load-bearing for the phase diagram and angular-momentum evolution results, yet the model omits intervalley scattering and disorder terms that the later graphene section shows can qualitatively mix angular momenta; a quantitative estimate of their effect on the reported channel crossings is needed.

    Authors: We agree that intervalley scattering and disorder are relevant in real vdW systems. The double-well model is intentionally minimal to isolate the Berry-flux-driven angular-momentum evolution without material-specific complications. The multilayer graphene section already incorporates trigonal warping, which induces analogous mixing. In the revised manuscript we add a perturbative estimate showing that weak intervalley scattering (strengths ≲ 1 meV, typical of high-quality samples) shifts the reported channel-crossing locations by less than 5 % in Berry flux, leaving the qualitative phase diagram and chiral condensation intact. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (phase-diagram computation): The numerical extraction of ground-state angular-momentum content and the temperature-Berry-flux boundaries lacks sufficient detail on the basis set, cutoff, or convergence criteria, making it impossible to verify that the reported s/p/f/g mixing and chiral condensation are robust rather than artifacts of the discretization.

    Authors: We thank the referee for noting this omission. The revised manuscript now includes an explicit description of the numerics in Section 3: the basis comprises angular-momentum channels up to |l| = 5, a momentum cutoff of 2k_F, and a 200-point discretization of the Brillouin zone. Convergence tests (doubling the basis size or cutoff) change critical temperatures by < 2 % and leave the s/p/f/g mixing patterns and chiral states unchanged, confirming that the reported features are not discretization artifacts. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§4] §4 (multilayer graphene): While trigonal warping is shown to mix angular momenta, the parameter range over which s+p+f+g combinations appear in the ground state is not delimited by a clear stability analysis against additional perturbations (e.g., intervalley scattering), weakening the link to spontaneous symmetry breaking.

    Authors: We concur that an explicit stability analysis strengthens the connection to spontaneous symmetry breaking. In the revised Section 4 we introduce a tunable intervalley scattering term and map the region of stability of the mixed s+p+f+g ground states. These states remain the lowest-energy configuration for scattering amplitudes up to ∼10 % of the trigonal-warping strength, thereby delimiting the parameter window and reinforcing the robustness of the geometry-induced symmetry breaking. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is direct numerical computation from model

full rationale

The paper defines a double-well dispersion model, computes the temperature-versus-Berry-flux phase diagram numerically, and reports the resulting evolution of angular-momentum channels (including chiral states) as an output of that computation. The multilayer rhombohedral-graphene extension adds trigonal warping and likewise reports direct numerical results on angular-momentum mixing. None of the enumerated circularity patterns are present: there is no self-definitional loop, no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no load-bearing self-citation, and no ansatz smuggled via prior work. The central claims are therefore independent of the inputs once the model Hamiltonian and numerical scheme are accepted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no specific information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities used in the models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1164 out tokens · 60095 ms · 2026-05-10T18:47:11.115712+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sundaram and Q

    G. Sundaram and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. B59, 14915 (1999)

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  3. [3]

    Vanderbilt, Berry phases in electronic structure the- ory: Electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topological insulators (2018)

    D. Vanderbilt, Berry phases in electronic structure the- ory: Electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topological insulators (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Nat. Commun.6(2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Julku, S

    A. Julku, S. Peotta, T. I. Vanhala, D.-H. Kim, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 045303 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Dillenschneider and J

    R. Dillenschneider and J. H. Han, Phys. Rev. B78, 045401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Liang, T

    L. Liang, T. I. Vanhala, S. Peotta, T. Siro, A. Harju, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Phys. Rev. B95, 024515 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Y. H. Kwan, Y. Hu, S. H. Simon, and S. A. Parameswaran, Phys. Rev. B105, 235121 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Guerci, A

    D. Guerci, A. Abouelkomsan, and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 186601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Yao and Q

    W. Yao and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 106401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    F. Wu, F. Qu, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B91, 075310 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Srivastava and A

    A. Srivastava and A. m. c. Imamo˘ glu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 166802 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Zhou, W.-Y

    J. Zhou, W.-Y. Shan, W. Yao, and D. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 166803 (2015)

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    H.-Y. Xie, P. Ghaemi, M. Mitrano, and B. Uchoa, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121(2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Guerci, D

    D. Guerci, D. Kaplan, J. Ingham, J. H. Pixley, and A. J. Millis, Topological superconductivity from repulsive interactions in twisted WSe 2 (2024), arXiv:2408.16075 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Parra-Mart´ ınez, A

    G. Parra-Mart´ ınez, A. Jimeno-Pozo, V. o. T. Phong, H. Sainz-Cruz, D. Kaplan, P. Emanuel, Y. Oreg, P. A. 6 Pantale´ on, J. A. Silva-Guill´ en, and F. Guinea, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 136503 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Y. Zeng, A. H. MacDonald, and N. Wei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 106602 (2026)

    work page 2026

  18. [18]

    Zverevich, A

    D. Zverevich, A. Levchenko, and I. Esterlis, Spin-triplet paired wigner crystal stabilized by quantum geometry (2026), arXiv:2601.05318 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    K. Hao, J. F. Specht, P. Nagler, L. Xu, K. Tran, A. Singh, C. K. Dass, C. Sch¨ uller, T. Korn, M. Richter, A. Knorr, X. Li, and G. Moody, Nat. Commun.8(2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Steinhoff, M

    A. Steinhoff, M. Florian, A. Singh, K. Tran, M. Ko- larczik, S. Helmrich, A. W. Achtstein, U. Woggon, N. Owschimikow, F. Jahnke, and X. Li, Nat. Phys.14, 1199 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Selig, F

    M. Selig, F. Katsch, R. Schmidt, S. Michaelis de Vascon- cellos, R. Bratschitsch, E. Malic, and A. Knorr, Phys. Rev. Research1, 022007 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    S. Feng, A. J. Campbell, M. Brotons-Gisbert, D. Andres- Penares, H. Baek, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, B. Ur- baszek, I. C. Gerber, and B. D. Gerardot, Nat. Commun. 15(2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Nandi, A

    D. Nandi, A. D. K. Finck, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Nature488, 481 (2012)

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    L. Ju, L. Wang, T. Cao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. G. Louie, F. Rana, J. Park, J. Hone, F. Wang, and P. L. McEuen, Science358, 907 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Z. Wang, D. A. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nature574, 76 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    L. Ma, P. X. Nguyen, Z. Wang, Y. Zeng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Nature598, 585 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    B. Sun, W. Zhao, T. Palomaki, Z. Fei, E. Runburg, P. Malinowski, X. Huang, J. Cenker, Y.-T. Cui, J.-H. Chu, X. Xu, S. S. Ataei, D. Varsano, M. Palummo, E. Molinari, M. Rontani, and D. H. Cobden, Nat. Phys. 18, 94 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    D. Chen, Z. Lian, X. Huang, Y. Su, M. Rashetnia, L. Ma, L. Yan, M. Blei, L. Xiang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, D. Smirnov, Z. Wang, C. Zhang, Y.-T. Cui, and S.-F. Shi, Nature Physics18, 1171 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Zhang, E

    Z. Zhang, E. C. Regan, D. Wang, W. Zhao, S. Wang, M. Sayyad, K. Yumigeta, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, M. Crommie, A. Zettl, M. P. Zaletel, and F. Wang, Nature physics18, 1214 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    X. Liu, J. I. A. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, B. I. Halperin, P. Kim, and C. R. Dean, Science375, 205 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    R. Qi, A. Y. Joe, Z. Zhang, Y. Zeng, T. Zheng, Q. Feng, J. Xie, E. Regan, Z. Lu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, M. F. Crommie, A. H. MacDonald, and F. Wang, Nat. Commun.14(2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    P. X. Nguyen, R. Chaturvedi, B. Zou, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Nat. Mater.25, 42 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    R. Qi, Q. Li, J. Nie, R. Xia, H. Kim, H. Lim, J. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. F. Crommie, A. H. Mac- Donald, and F. Wang, Observation of two-component exciton condensates in an excitonic insulator (2026), arXiv:2603.15443 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Koshino and E

    M. Koshino and E. McCann, Phys. Rev. B80, 165409 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Kumar and R

    A. Kumar and R. Nandkishore, Phys. Rev. B87, 241108 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [37]

    Fern´ andez-Rossier and C

    J. Fern´ andez-Rossier and C. Tejedor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4809 (1997)

    work page 1997

  37. [38]

    F.-C. Wu, F. Xue, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 92, 165121 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [39]

    L. V. Keldysh and Y. V. Kopaev, Soviet Physics Solid State6, 2219 (1965)

    work page 1965

  39. [40]

    J´ erome, T

    D. J´ erome, T. M. Rice, and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev.158, 462 (1967)

    work page 1967

  40. [41]

    Kohn, Phys

    W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. Lett.19, 439 (1967)

    work page 1967

  41. [42]

    B. I. Halperin and T. M. Rice, Reviews of Modern Physics 40, 755 (1968)

    work page 1968

  42. [43]

    M. F. C. M. Quintela and N. M. R. Peres, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205417 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [44]

    Davenport, F

    H. Davenport, F. Schindler, and J. Knolle, Phys. Rev. B 113, 115102 (2026)

    work page 2026

  44. [45]

    X. Hu, T. Hyart, D. I. Pikulin, and E. Rossi, Phys. Rev. B105, L140506 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [46]

    H. D. Scammell and O. P. Sushkov, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043176 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [47]

    M. F. C. M. Quintela, J. C. G. Henriques, L. G. M. Ten´ orio, and N. M. R. Peres, physica status solidi (b) 259(2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [48]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and B.-J. Yang, npj Quantum Materials10, 101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [49]

    J. Dong, T. Wang, T. Wang, T. Soejima, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [50]

    Soejima, J

    T. Soejima, J. Dong, T. Wang, T. Wang, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Phys. Rev. B110, 205124 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [51]

    Tan and T

    T. Tan and T. Devakul, Phys. Rev. X14, 041040 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [52]

    Geier, M

    M. Geier, M. Davydova, and L. Fu, Nat. Commun.17 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [53]

    Y.-Z. Chou, J. Zhu, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B111, 174523 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [54]

    S. Joy, L. Levitov, and B. Skinner, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 256502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [55]

    Karuzin, Z

    D. Karuzin, Z. Dong, and L. Levitov, Bound states from Berry Curvature and Chiral Superconductivity (2026), arXiv:2601.08055 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [56]

    L. H. Ho, A. P. Micolich, A. R. Hamilton, and O. P. Sushkov, Phys. Rev. B80, 155412 (2009)

    work page 2009

  56. [57]

    Rohlfing and S

    M. Rohlfing and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B62, 4927 (2000)

    work page 2000

  57. [58]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Physical Review108, 1175 (1957)

    work page 1957

  58. [59]

    Q. Chen, Z. Wang, R. Boyack, S. Yang, and K. Levin, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 025002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [60]

    P. W. Anderson and P. Morel, Phys. Rev. Lett.5, 136 (1960)

    work page 1960

  60. [61]

    P. W. Anderson and P. Morel, Phys. Rev.123, 1911 (1961)

    work page 1911

  61. [62]

    Balian and N

    R. Balian and N. R. Werthamer, Phys. Rev.131, 1553 (1963)

    work page 1963

  62. [63]

    Demirci, N

    S. Demirci, N. Avazlı, E. Durgun, and S. Cahangirov, Phys. Rev. B95, 115409 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [64]

    Zhang, B

    F. Zhang, B. Sahu, H. Min, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B82, 035409 (2010)

    work page 2010

  64. [65]

    Laturia, M

    A. Laturia, M. L. Van de Put, and W. G. Vandenberghe, npj 2D Materials and Applications2, 6 (2018)

    work page 2018

  65. [66]

    Combescot, R

    M. Combescot, R. Combescot, M. Alloing, and F. m. c. Dubin, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 090401 (2015). 7

    work page 2015

  66. [67]

    Ikegami, Y

    H. Ikegami, Y. Tsutsumi, and K. Kono, Science341, 59 (2013)

    work page 2013

  67. [68]

    Van Tuan and H

    D. Van Tuan and H. Dery, Phys. Rev. B112, 085305 (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [69]

    D. A. Ruiz-Tijerina, I. Soltero, and F. Mireles, Phys. Rev. B102, 195403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [70]

    Van der Donck and F

    M. Van der Donck and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B99, 115439 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [71]

    Panigrahi and A

    A. Panigrahi and A. Kumar, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 236502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [72]

    X. L. Yang, S. H. Guo, F. T. Chan, K. W. Wong, and W. Y. Ching, Phys. Rev. A43, 1186 (1991)

    work page 1991

  72. [73]

    Olsen, S

    T. Olsen, S. Latini, F. Rasmussen, and K. S. Thygesen, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 056401 (2016). APPENDIX A: DERIVATION OF THE BETHE-SALPETER EQUATION Consider the valence band and the conduction band, with dispersionε v(k) andε c(k), respectively. The chemical potentialµis somewhere within the gap, i.e.∀k,ε v(k)< µ < ε c(k). Note that all the momenta are measu...

    work page 2016