pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05501 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Valence Bond Glass and Glassy Spin Liquid in Disordered Frustrated Magnets

Soumyaranjan Dash , Vansh Narang , Sanjeev Kumar
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords valence bond glassglassy spin liquiddisordered J1-J2 modelspecific heat anomalysinglet excitationsfrustrated magnetssquare latticeMonte Carlo simulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Disordered frustrated magnets form a valence-bond glass ground state that melts into a glassy spin liquid, producing field-insensitive specific-heat anomalies from collective singlets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the highly frustrated regime of the disordered spin-1/2 J1-J2 Heisenberg model on the square lattice using semiclassical Monte Carlo simulations. It establishes that the ground state is a valence-bond glass, which transitions to a glassy spin liquid at finite temperatures. The low-temperature specific-heat anomaly is traced to collective singlet excitations, which remain unaffected by external magnetic fields. This finding supplies an alternative explanation for the thermodynamic behavior observed in materials previously viewed as quantum spin liquid candidates. Readers would care because it reframes how to interpret the absence of magnetic order combined with anomalous heat capacity in real disordered magnets.

Core claim

Using semiclassical Monte Carlo simulations on the disordered spin-1/2 J1-J2 Heisenberg model, the authors identify the ground state as a valence-bond glass. This state melts into a glassy spin liquid at finite temperatures. The low-temperature specific-heat anomaly arises from collective singlet excitations and is consequently insensitive to external magnetic fields, providing a robust signature for the valence-bond glass phase and a new interpretation of thermodynamic data on disordered spin-liquid candidate materials.

What carries the argument

Semiclassical Monte Carlo analysis of freezing parameters, spin-spin correlation distributions, and specific heat in the disordered J1-J2 Heisenberg model on the square lattice.

If this is right

  • The ground state exhibits no conventional magnetic order yet displays valence-bond glass features through frozen short-range singlet correlations.
  • The specific-heat anomaly at low temperatures persists unchanged under applied magnetic fields.
  • Thermodynamic signatures resembling those of quantum spin liquids can emerge from valence-bond glass phases in disordered systems.
  • Experimental data on candidate materials must be reinterpreted to distinguish valence-bond glass from true spin-liquid behavior.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar glassy phases may appear in other frustrated lattices with quenched disorder, suggesting a broader class of valence-bond glasses.
  • Local probes sensitive to singlet excitations could confirm the glass character without relying solely on thermodynamics.
  • The melting transition to a glassy spin liquid implies temperature-tunable dynamics that might be detectable via neutron scattering or muon relaxation.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical Monte Carlo method sufficiently captures quantum singlet formation and collective excitations in the spin-1/2 disordered system without missing essential quantum fluctuations.

What would settle it

A measurement showing strong magnetic-field dependence of the low-temperature specific-heat anomaly in a highly frustrated disordered magnet would contradict the collective-singlet origin.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05501 by Sanjeev Kumar, Soumyaranjan Dash, Vansh Narang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Distributions of nn correlation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of, (a) the freezing parame [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Temperature dependence of specific heat for dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The absence of conventional magnetic order together with anomalous low-temperature magnetic heat capacity is often interpreted as evidence for quantum spin liquid ground states in frustrated magnets. Using a recently developed semiclassical Monte Carlo approach, we show that similar thermodynamic signatures arise in the highly frustrated regime of the disordered spin-1/2 J1-J2 Heisenberg model on the square lattice. By analyzing the freezing parameters, the distribution of spin-spin correlations, and the specific heat, we identify the ground state as a valence-bond glass that melts into a glassy spin liquid at finite temperatures. We show that the low-temperature specific-heat anomaly originates from collective singlet excitations, and consequently it is insensitive to external magnetic fields. This leads to a robust experimental signature of the valence bond glass phase and a completely new interpretation of the thermodynamic data on disordered spin-liquid candidate materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper uses a semiclassical Monte Carlo approach to study the disordered spin-1/2 J1-J2 Heisenberg model on the square lattice in the highly frustrated regime. By examining freezing parameters, the distribution of spin-spin correlations, and the specific heat, it identifies the ground state as a valence-bond glass that melts into a glassy spin liquid at finite temperatures. The low-temperature specific-heat anomaly is attributed to collective singlet excitations and shown to be insensitive to external magnetic fields, offering an alternative interpretation to quantum spin liquid scenarios for anomalous thermodynamics in frustrated magnets.

Significance. If the semiclassical method adequately captures the quantum physics, the work provides a valuable alternative framework for interpreting the absence of magnetic order and anomalous specific heat in disordered frustrated magnets, without requiring a quantum spin liquid. The analysis of correlation distributions and freezing parameters strengthens the phase identification, and the predicted field-insensitivity of the specific-heat anomaly constitutes a clear, falsifiable experimental signature. The application of the recently developed semiclassical Monte Carlo technique to this setting is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The central claims rest on the semiclassical Monte Carlo faithfully reproducing quantum singlet formation, collective excitations, and thermodynamics in the S=1/2 disordered frustrated system. The manuscript provides no benchmarks against exact diagonalization or quantum Monte Carlo on small clusters to validate that zero-point motion, tunneling between valence-bond configurations, or disorder-induced effects are not qualitatively altered by the approximation.
  2. [Results (specific heat and field dependence)] The claim that the low-T specific-heat anomaly originates from collective singlet excitations and is consequently insensitive to fields is load-bearing for the experimental signature. Direct simulations with applied magnetic fields, including quantitative comparison of the anomaly with and without the field, are needed to substantiate this rather than inferring it solely from the zero-field analysis.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from specifying the range of J1/J2 ratios and disorder strengths explored, along with typical system sizes and number of disorder realizations, to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] The central claims rest on the semiclassical Monte Carlo faithfully reproducing quantum singlet formation, collective excitations, and thermodynamics in the S=1/2 disordered frustrated system. The manuscript provides no benchmarks against exact diagonalization or quantum Monte Carlo on small clusters to validate that zero-point motion, tunneling between valence-bond configurations, or disorder-induced effects are not qualitatively altered by the approximation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the absence of explicit small-cluster benchmarks against exact diagonalization or quantum Monte Carlo is a limitation of the current presentation. The semiclassical Monte Carlo method is an approximation whose ability to capture zero-point motion and valence-bond tunneling is not guaranteed to be quantitative for all observables. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the Methods section that (i) summarizes the known limitations of the approach for S=1/2 systems, (ii) explains why the combination of freezing parameters and the full distribution of spin-spin correlations still provides robust evidence for the valence-bond-glass identification, and (iii) outlines how future exact benchmarks on small disordered clusters could be performed. We do not claim that such benchmarks have already been carried out for the present parameter regime. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results (specific heat and field dependence)] The claim that the low-T specific-heat anomaly originates from collective singlet excitations and is consequently insensitive to fields is load-bearing for the experimental signature. Direct simulations with applied magnetic fields, including quantitative comparison of the anomaly with and without the field, are needed to substantiate this rather than inferring it solely from the zero-field analysis.

    Authors: We agree that a direct numerical demonstration of field insensitivity would make the experimental signature more compelling. Although the manuscript infers insensitivity from the singlet character of the excitations (which carry zero total spin and therefore experience no first-order Zeeman shift), we will perform additional semiclassical Monte Carlo runs at finite magnetic field. In the revised version we will add a figure and accompanying text that quantitatively compare the low-temperature specific-heat anomaly in zero field and in a representative finite field, thereby confirming that the anomaly remains essentially unchanged. This will be presented as new data rather than an inference. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct simulation outputs identify phases without reduction to inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper applies a semiclassical Monte Carlo method to the disordered spin-1/2 J1-J2 Heisenberg model and derives its central claims (valence-bond glass ground state melting to glassy spin liquid, specific-heat anomaly from collective singlets, field insensitivity) from direct analysis of simulation outputs including freezing parameters, spin-spin correlation distributions, and specific heat. These quantities are computed results, not parameters fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, nor are they defined in terms of the target phases. No load-bearing self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is indicated in the provided text; the method is invoked as an established tool whose outputs are then interpreted. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on the validity of the semiclassical approximation for spin-1/2 quantum spins and on the operational definitions of valence bond glass via freezing parameters and correlation distributions; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • J1/J2 ratio
    Tuned to the highly frustrated regime; value not specified in abstract but central to the model.
  • disorder strength
    Controls the disordered regime; specific distribution and magnitude not given in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Semiclassical Monte Carlo reproduces essential quantum singlet physics in the spin-1/2 Heisenberg model
    Invoked by the choice of method to access the ground state and excitations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5445 in / 1219 out tokens · 63047 ms · 2026-05-10T19:05:52.566028+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Disorder-driven coexistence of distinct dynamical states in frustrated Sr$_3$CuNb$_2$O$_9$: a microscopic $\mu$SR and $^{93}$Nb NMR study

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    μSR and ⁹³Nb NMR data show microscopic coexistence of random singlet and quantum spin liquid-like dynamical states in disordered Sr₃CuNb₂O₉.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Materials Research Bulletin8, 153 (1973)

    work page 1973

  2. [2]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a re- view, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 016502 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Quantum spin liquid states, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 025003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Broholm, R

    C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids, Science367, eaay0668 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, nature 464, 199 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Wen, S.-L

    J. Wen, S.-L. Yu, S. Li, W. Yu, and J.-X. Li, Experimen- tal identification of quantum spin liquids, npj Quantum Materials4, 12 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Wen, Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, Phys

    X.-G. Wen, Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B65, 165113 (2002)

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar,et al., Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science 374, 1242 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of physics303, 2 (2003)

    work page 2003

  10. [10]

    Basov, R

    D. Basov, R. Averitt, and D. Hsieh, Towards properties on demand in quantum materials, Nature materials16, 1077 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    K. Wang, S. Feng, P. Zhu, R. Chi, H.-J. Liao, N. Trivedi, and T. Xiang, Fractionalization signatures in the dynam- ics of quantum spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B111, L100402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Knolle, D

    J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, J. T. Chalker, and R. Moess- ner, Dynamics of fractionalization in quantum spin liq- uids, Phys. Rev. B92, 115127 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    J. Nasu, Y. Kato, J. Yoshitake, Y. Kamiya, and Y. Motome, Spin-liquid–to–spin-liquid transition in ki- taev magnets driven by fractionalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 137203 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    H.-K. Jin, J. Knolle, and M. Knap, Fractionalized prethermalization in a driven quantum spin liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 226701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Li, D.-W

    H. Li, D.-W. Qu, H.-K. Zhang, Y.-Z. Jia, S.-S. Gong, Y. Qi, and W. Li, Universal thermodynamics in the ki- taev fractional liquid, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043015 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Th´ eveniaut and M

    H. Th´ eveniaut and M. Vojta, Bound states of fractional- ized excitations in a modulated kitaev spin liquid, Phys. Rev. B96, 054401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Eschmann, P

    T. Eschmann, P. A. Mishchenko, K. O’Brien, T. A. Boje- sen, Y. Kato, M. Hermanns, Y. Motome, and S. Trebst, Thermodynamic classification of three-dimensional ki- taev spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B102, 075125 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    O. I. Motrunich, Variational study of triangular lattice spin-1/2 model with ring exchanges and spin liquid state inκ-(et) 2cu2(cn)3, Physical Review B72, 045105 (2005)

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    Watanabe, H

    K. Watanabe, H. Kawamura, H. Nakano, and T. Sakai, Quantum spin-liquid behavior in the spin-1/2 random heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan83, 034714 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Kawamura and K

    H. Kawamura and K. Uematsu, Nature of the randomness-induced quantum spin liquids in two dimen- sions, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter31, 504003 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [22]

    S. Yoon, W. Lee, S. Lee, J. Park, C. H. Lee, Y. S. Choi, S.-H. Do, W.-J. Choi, W.-T. Chen, F. Chou, D. I. Gorbunov, Y. Oshima, A. Ali, Y. Singh, A. Berlie, I. Watanabe, and K.-Y. Choi, Quantum dis- ordered state in theJ 1−J2 square-lattice antiferromag- net sr 2Cu(te0.95w0.05)o6, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 014411 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [23]

    Z. Zhu, P. A. Maksimov, S. R. White, and A. L. Chernyshev, Disorder-induced mimicry of a spin liquid in ybmggao4, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 157201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [24]

    Kimchi, A

    I. Kimchi, A. Nahum, and T. Senthil, Valence bonds in random quantum magnets: Theory and application to ybmggao4, Phys. Rev. X8, 031028 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [25]

    Khatua, M

    J. Khatua, M. Gomilˇ sek, J. Orain, A. Strydom, Z. Jagliˇ ci´ c, C. Colin, S. Petit, A. Ozarowski, L. Mangin- Thro, K. Sethupathi,et al., Signature of a randomness- driven spin-liquid state in a frustrated magnet, Commu- nications Physics5, 99 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [26]

    Murayama, Y

    H. Murayama, Y. Sato, T. Taniguchi, R. Kurihara, X. Z. Xing, W. Huang, S. Kasahara, Y. Kasahara, I. Kim- chi, M. Yoshida, Y. Iwasa, Y. Mizukami, T. Shibauchi, M. Konczykowski, and Y. Matsuda, Effect of quenched disorder on the quantum spin liquid state of the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet 1t−tas 2, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013099 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [27]

    Byczuk, W

    K. Byczuk, W. Hofstetter, U. Yu, and D. Vollhardt, Cor- related electrons in the presence of disorder, The Euro- pean Physical Journal Special Topics180, 135 (2009)

    work page 2009

  27. [28]

    Redka, S

    D. Redka, S. A. Khan, E. Martino, X. Mettan, L. Ciric, D. Tolj, T. Ivˇ si´ c, A. Held, M. Caputo, E. B. Guedes, et al., Interplay between disorder and electronic correla- tions in compositionally complex alloys, Nature commu- nications15, 7983 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [29]

    Prozorov, J

    R. Prozorov, J. A. Sauls, P. Hirschfeld, N. E. Hussey, and M. Iavarone, Disorder and superconductivity: a 21st- century update (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [30]

    S. Dash, A. Koley, and S. Kumar, Vacancy induced ex- pansion of spin-liquid regime in theJ 1−J2 heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 076502 (2026)

    work page 2026

  30. [31]

    Klanjˇ sek, A

    M. Klanjˇ sek, A. Zorko, R.ˇZitko, J. Mravlje, Z. Jagliˇ ci´ c, 6 P. K. Biswas, P. Prelovˇ sek, D. Mihailovic, and D. Arˇ con, A high-temperature quantum spin liquid with polaron spins, Nature Physics13, 1130 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [32]

    J. P. Carlo, J. P. Clancy, T. Aharen, Z. Yamani, J. P. C. Ruff, J. J. Wagman, G. J. Van Gastel, H. M. L. Noad, G. E. Granroth, J. E. Greedan, H. A. Dabkowska, and B. D. Gaulin, Triplet and in-gap magnetic states in the ground state of the quantum frustrated fcc antiferromag- net ba2ymoo6, Phys. Rev. B84, 100404 (2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [33]

    Uematsu and H

    K. Uematsu and H. Kawamura, Randomness-induced quantum spin liquid behavior in thes= 1 2 randomJ 1−J2 heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square lattice, Phys. Rev. B98, 134427 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [34]

    Richter and J

    J. Richter and J. Schulenburg, The spin-1/2 j1–j2 heisen- berg antiferromagnet on the square lattice: Exact diago- nalization for n= 40 spins, The European Physical Jour- nal B73, 117 (2010)

    work page 2010

  34. [35]

    L. R. Niestemski and Z. Wang, Valence bond glass theory of electronic disorder and the pseudogap state of high- temperature cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 107001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [36]

    M. A. de Vries, A. C. Mclaughlin, and J.-W. G. Bos, Va- lence bond glass on an fcc lattice in the double perovskite ba2ymoo6, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 177202 (2010)

    work page 2010

  36. [37]

    R. R. P. Singh, Valence bond glass phase in dilute kagome antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 177203 (2010)

    work page 2010

  37. [38]

    Watanabe, N

    M. Watanabe, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, W. Ueno, K. Mat- sui, and T. Goto, Valence-bond-glass state with a singlet gap in the spin- 1 2 square-lattice randomJ 1−J2 heisen- berg antiferromagnet sr 2cute1−xwxo6, Phys. Rev. B98, 054422 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [39]

    Riedl, R

    K. Riedl, R. Valent´ ı, and S. M. Winter, Critical spin liq- uid versus valence-bond glass in a triangular-lattice or- ganic antiferromagnet, Nature communications10, 2561 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [40]

    S. Lee, W. Lee, W. Guohua, J. Ma, H. Zhou, M. Lee, E. S. Choi, and K.-Y. Choi, Experimental evidence for a valence-bond glass in the 5d1 double perovskite ba2ywo6, Phys. Rev. B103, 224430 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [41]

    F. C. Coomer and E. J. Cussen, Structural and magnetic properties of ba2lumoo6: a valence bond glass, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter25, 082202 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [42]

    Mustonen, H

    O. Mustonen, H. Mutch, H. Walker, P. Baker, F. Coomer, R. Perry, C. Pughe, G. Stenning, C. Liu, S. Dutton,et al., Valence bond glass state in the 4 d 1 fcc antiferromagnet ba2lumoo6, npj Quantum Materials7, 74 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [43]

    A. C. Mclaughlin, M. A. de Vries, and J.-W. G. Bos, Persistence of the valence bond glass state in the dou- ble perovskites ba2−xsrxymoo6, Phys. Rev. B82, 094424 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [44]

    Tarzia and G

    M. Tarzia and G. Biroli, The valence bond glass phase, EPL (Europhysics Letters)82, 67008 (2008)

    work page 2008

  44. [45]

    V. N. Kotov, J. Oitmaa, O. P. Sushkov, and Z. Weihong, Low-energy singlet and triplet excitations in the spin- liquid phase of the two-dimensionalJ 1−j2 model, Phys. Rev. B60, 14613 (1999)

    work page 1999

  45. [46]

    B. Y. Pan, Y. Xu, J. M. Ni, S. Y. Zhou, X. C. Hong, X. Qiu, and S. Y. Li, Unambiguous experimental verifica- tion of linear-in-temperature spinon thermal conductiv- ity in an antiferromagnetic heisenberg chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 167201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [47]

    M. Kim, G. De Tomasi, and C. Castelnovo, Anderson localization of emergent quasiparticles: Spinon and vison interplay at finite temperature in a𭟋 2 gauge theory in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043206 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [48]

    Lavar´ elo and G

    A. Lavar´ elo and G. Roux, Localization of spinons in random majumdar-ghosh chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 087204 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [49]

    Y. Li, H. Liao, Z. Zhang, S. Li, F. Jin, L. Ling, L. Zhang, Y. Zou, L. Pi, Z. Yang,et al., Gapless quantum spin liquid ground state in the two-dimensional spin-1/2 tri- angular antiferromagnet ybmggao4, Scientific reports5, 16419 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [50]

    B. Liu, Z. Zeng, A. Xu, Y. Sun, O. Yakubovich, L. Shvan- skaya, S. Li, and A. Vasiliev, Low-temperature specific- heat studies on two square-kagome antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B105, 155153 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [51]

    Okamoto, M

    Y. Okamoto, M. Nohara, H. Aruga-Katori, and H. Tak- agi, Spin-liquid state in thes= 1/2 hyperkagome antifer- romagnet na4ir3o8, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 137207 (2007)

    work page 2007

  51. [52]

    Singh, Y

    Y. Singh, Y. Tokiwa, J. Dong, and P. Gegenwart, Spin liquid close to a quantum critical point in na4ir3o8, Phys. Rev. B88, 220413 (2013)

    work page 2013

  52. [53]

    A. C. Shockley, F. Bert, J.-C. Orain, Y. Okamoto, and P. Mendels, Frozen state and spin liquid physics in na4ir3o8: An nmr study, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 047201 (2015)

    work page 2015