pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05837 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Near 13% efficient semitransparent Cu(In,Ga)S2 solar cells with band gap of 1.6 eV on transparent back contact

Kulwinder Kaur , Arivazhagan Valluvar Oli , Michele Melchiorre , Wolfram Hempel , Wolfram Witte , Jan Keller , Susanne Siebentritt This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Cu(In,Ga)S2semitransparent solar cellsITO back contacttandem top cellsodium diffusionGaOx passivationwide band gaphigh temperature growth
0
0 comments X

The pith

Semitransparent Cu(In,Ga)S2 cells reach 12.7 percent efficiency at 1.6 eV band gap on thin ITO back contacts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines wide-gap Cu(In,Ga)S2 absorbers deposited on indium tin oxide transparent back contacts intended as top cells for tandem solar devices. It demonstrates that sodium supplied only by diffusion from the glass substrate, made possible by a thin ITO layer, produces a semitransparent cell with 12.7 percent efficiency. Growth at 630 degrees Celsius improves absorber quality and raises photoluminescence quantum yield by two orders of magnitude, while a gallium oxide layer forms at the rear interface to aid passivation when kept thin. Additional sodium fluoride co-evaporation yields similar 12 percent efficiency on thicker ITO but is not required when the ITO layer is thin enough to allow glass sodium to reach the absorber.

Core claim

Wide-gap Cu(In,Ga)S2 solar cells grown on transparent ITO back contacts achieve 12.7 percent efficiency in semitransparent configuration with a 1.6 eV band gap when sodium diffuses from the glass substrate alone, enabled by a thin ITO layer; high-temperature growth at 630 C improves material quality and photoluminescence, and a thin GaOx layer at the rear contact supplies passivation without causing current blocking.

What carries the argument

Thin ITO transparent back contact that permits adequate Na diffusion from soda-lime glass while supporting high-temperature growth and forming a controlled GaOx passivation layer at the absorber-rear interface.

If this is right

  • The cells can function as top absorbers in tandem stacks with narrower-gap bottom cells.
  • High substrate temperature of 630 C produces wide-gap material with substantially reduced non-radiative recombination.
  • Na supply from glass alone suffices when ITO thickness is reduced, eliminating the need for NaF co-evaporation in some cases.
  • Thinner GaOx layers avoid the current-blocking behavior seen with thicker interfacial layers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same thin-ITO approach may allow sodium control in other wide-gap chalcogenide absorbers grown at elevated temperature.
  • Balancing ITO thickness could simultaneously optimize sodium delivery, optical transmission, and interface defect density.
  • The reported photoluminescence improvement indicates room for further efficiency gains once light management in the semitransparent geometry is addressed.

Load-bearing premise

The GaOx layer that forms at the rear contact during high-temperature growth supplies a net passivation benefit without adding unaccounted recombination or optical losses.

What would settle it

Fabricate and measure a full tandem stack using this semitransparent top cell and compare its measured short-circuit current and open-circuit voltage against the values predicted from the single-junction 12.7 percent efficiency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05837 by Arivazhagan Valluvar Oli, Jan Keller, Kulwinder Kaur, Michele Melchiorre, Susanne Siebentritt, Wolfram Hempel, Wolfram Witte.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: a) [Ga]/([Ga]+[In]) depth profiles of different CIGS absorbers determined from GDOES. b) Ga and Na signal intensity profiles with normalized depth of the absorbers (real absorber thickness ~ 1.5 µm for all samples). To mention that T575/(0Na)/ITO250 was recorded separately for GDOES than other three. The data for this sample is used only for qualitative comparison to highlight Ga and Na signal changes. The… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Wide-gap Cu(In,Ga)S2 solar cells with In2O3:Sn (ITO) as transparent back contact are evaluated for the application as top cells in tandem devices. The effect of Na on the solar cell performance is investigated by supplying additional Na by NaF co-evaporation or exclusively by Na diffusion from glass. An efficiency of 12.7% is achieved for a semitransparent solar cell with a band gap of 1.6 eV, with sufficient Na diffusion from glass only, allowed by a thin ITO layer. Absorber grown with additional NaF co-evaporation during Cu(In,Ga)S2 growth on thicker ITO show a comparable efficiency of 12%. High temperature growth at Tsub = 630{\deg}C enhances overall absorber quality and results in wide-gap absorbers, with photoluminescence quantum yield improved to 1.5 x 10-5, two orders of magnitude higher than absorber grown at low temperature. NaF co-evaporation is effective in suppressing deep defects, thereby reducing non-radiative recombination and enhancing photoluminescence quantum yield further. A GaOx interfacial layer is formed at the rear contact, likely contributing to the passivation of the back contact. With the presence of thick GaOx layer, current blocking effects are visible in the current-voltage curves. On the contrary, a thinner ITO tends to result in thinner GaOx layer and no current blocking is observed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the fabrication of semitransparent Cu(In,Ga)S2 solar cells with a 1.6 eV band gap using ITO as the transparent back contact. It achieves an efficiency of 12.7% by relying solely on Na diffusion from the glass substrate through a thin ITO layer, without additional NaF. High-temperature growth at 630°C is shown to improve absorber quality, increasing PLQY to 1.5 × 10^{-5}, and the formation of a GaOx layer at the rear interface is discussed in terms of passivation and current blocking effects.

Significance. Should the reported efficiency and PLQY improvements hold upon verification, this work would be significant for advancing wide-bandgap semitransparent absorbers for tandem solar cell applications. The demonstration of effective Na incorporation via thin ITO and the benefits of high-temperature processing provide valuable experimental insights into material and interface optimization for Cu(In,Ga)S2 devices.

major comments (3)
  1. Abstract: The efficiency of 12.7% is stated without reference to supporting data such as full JV characteristics, error bars, or statistics from multiple cells, which is necessary to substantiate the claim against potential back-contact degradation during high-temperature growth.
  2. Results/Discussion on growth temperature and ITO: The manuscript lacks explicit measurements of ITO properties (sheet resistance, transmittance) before and after the 630°C substrate temperature process, leaving open the possibility that the back contact is compromised, which would undermine the semitransparent cell performance.
  3. Discussion of GaOx interfacial layer: While the GaOx layer is suggested to contribute to passivation, the paper does not provide quantitative analysis or additional characterization (e.g., EQE or impedance spectroscopy) to confirm its net positive effect in the thin ITO configuration without introducing unaccounted losses.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The notation for PLQY (1.5 x 10-5) should use proper superscript formatting for consistency.
  2. Throughout manuscript: Ensure all figures include scale bars, legends, and clear labels, and that any tables report average values with standard deviations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The efficiency of 12.7% is stated without reference to supporting data such as full JV characteristics, error bars, or statistics from multiple cells, which is necessary to substantiate the claim against potential back-contact degradation during high-temperature growth.

    Authors: The full JV characteristics of the champion cell achieving 12.7% efficiency are shown in the results section, with corresponding EQE data. Statistics from multiple devices are included in the supplementary information, confirming consistent performance without elevated series resistance. This indicates the ITO back contact remains functional after high-temperature growth. We will revise the abstract to briefly reference the supporting device data in the main text. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Results/Discussion on growth temperature and ITO: The manuscript lacks explicit measurements of ITO properties (sheet resistance, transmittance) before and after the 630°C substrate temperature process, leaving open the possibility that the back contact is compromised, which would undermine the semitransparent cell performance.

    Authors: The achieved efficiency of 12.7%, high fill factor, and maintained semitransparency after high-temperature processing demonstrate that the ITO back contact is not compromised, as degradation would increase series resistance and reduce performance. ITO is known to be stable under these vacuum growth conditions. We do not have explicit pre- and post-process ITO measurements from this study and will not add them, as the device metrics sufficiently support the claims. revision: no

  3. Referee: Discussion of GaOx interfacial layer: While the GaOx layer is suggested to contribute to passivation, the paper does not provide quantitative analysis or additional characterization (e.g., EQE or impedance spectroscopy) to confirm its net positive effect in the thin ITO configuration without introducing unaccounted losses.

    Authors: The GaOx effect is shown by the absence of current blocking in JV curves for the thin ITO case (thinner GaOx) versus blocking in thick ITO. The EQE spectra in the manuscript confirm efficient carrier collection without interface-related losses. While impedance spectroscopy was not performed, the PLQY increase to 1.5 × 10^{-5} and overall efficiency support the passivation role. We will expand the discussion section with a more detailed analysis of the JV and EQE observations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental reporting

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental study reporting measured efficiencies (12.7% and 12%), PLQY values, and interface observations from fabricated Cu(In,Ga)S2 devices on ITO back contacts. No equations, models, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations are present that could reduce to their own inputs by construction. All central claims rest on direct characterization data (J-V curves, PLQY, TEM/EDX for GaOx) rather than any self-referential logic or self-citation chain. This is the most common honest finding for device-fabrication papers and yields a score of 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental optimization study with no mathematical model or fitted parameters; relies on empirical process observations and standard materials assumptions.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption High substrate temperature of 630°C improves absorber quality and widens the band gap
    Invoked to explain observed PLQY increase to 1.5e-5; treated as established from prior work in the field.
  • domain assumption GaOx layer at the rear interface contributes to back-contact passivation
    Stated as likely contributing to reduced recombination; no independent verification provided in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5601 in / 1303 out tokens · 33875 ms · 2026-05-10T19:46:05.177416+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nature Energy, 2024

    Keller, J., et al., High-concentration silver alloying and steep back -contact gallium grading enabling copper indium gallium selenide solar cell with 23.6% efficiency. Nature Energy, 2024. 9: p. 467-478

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Physical Review Applied, 2019

    Lomuscio, A., et al., Quasi-fermi-level splitting of Cu-Poor and Cu-Rich CuInS2 absorber layers. Physical Review Applied, 2019. 11(5): p. 054052

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2016

    Hiroi, H., et al., New world-record efficiency for pure-sulfide Cu(In,Ga)S2 thin-Film solar cell with Cd-free buffer layer via KCN-free process. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2016. 6(3): p. 760-763

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Solar energy materials and solar cells, 2010

    Kaigawa, R., et al., Tandem solar cells with Cu(In,Ga)S2 top cells on ZnO coated substrates. Solar energy materials and solar cells, 2010. 94(11): p. 1880-1883

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Nature Energy, 2023

    Yang, S.-C., et al., Efficiency boost of bifacial Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 thin-film solar cells for flexible and tandem applications with silver -assisted low-temperature process. Nature Energy, 2023. 8(1): p. 40-51

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Solar energy, 2004

    Nakada, T., et al., Novel device structure for Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 thin film solar cells using transparent conducting oxide back and front contacts. Solar energy, 2004. 77(6): p. 739-747

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2021

    Li, Y ., et al., Sodium control in Ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells on transparent back contact for efficiencies beyond 12%. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2021. 223: p. 110969

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Solar RRL, 2022

    Keller, J., et al., Wide‐Gap Chalcopyrite Solar Cells with Indium Oxide –Based Transparent Back Contacts. Solar RRL, 2022. 6(8): p. 2200401

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2019

    Son, Y .-S., et al., Control of structural and electrical properties of indium tin oxide (ITO)/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 interface for transparent back -contact applications. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2019. 123(3): p. 1635-1644

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Solar RRL

    Keller, J., et al., Bifacial wide‐gap (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2 solar cell with 13.6% efficiency using In2O3: W as a back contact material. Solar RRL. 8: p. 2400430

    work page

  11. [11]

    Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2018

    Keller, J., et al., Using hydrogen‐doped In 2O3 films as a transparent back contact in (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2018. 26(3): p. 159-170

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2018

    Keller, J., et al., Bifacial Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 solar cells using hydrogen‐doped In 2O3 films as a transparent back contact. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2018. 26(10): p. 846-858

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2025

    Weiss, T.P., et al., CuIn(Se,Te)2 absorbers with bandgaps< 1 eV for bottom cells in tandem applications. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2025. 33(2): p. 253-264

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Nanophotonics, 2021

    Li, X., et al., Silicon heterojunction-based tandem solar cells: past, status, and future prospects. Nanophotonics, 2021. 10(8): p. 2001-2022

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Siebentritt, S. and U. Rau, Wide-gap chalcopyrites. V ol. 1. 2006: Springer

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    Physical Review Materials, 2019

    Spindler, C., et al., Electronic defects in Cu(In,Ga)Se2: Towards a comprehensive model. Physical Review Materials, 2019. 3(9): p. 090302

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Lany, S. and A. Zunger, Light-and bias-induced metastabilities in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 based solar cells caused by the (VSe-VCu) vacancy complex. Journal of Applied Physics, 2006. 100(11): p. 113725

    work page 2006

  18. [18]

    16(8): p

    Siebentritt, S., et al., Sulfide Chalcopyrite Solar Cells ––Are They the Same as Selenides with a Wider Bandgap? physica status solidi (RRL)–Rapid Research Letters, 2022. 16(8): p. 2200126

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Small, 2025

    Adeleye, D., et al., Wide‐Bandgap Cu(In,Ga)S2 Solar Cell: Mitigation of Composition Segregation in High Ga Films for Better Efficiency. Small, 2025. 21: p. 2405221

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Journal of Physics: Materials, 2021

    Siebentritt, S., et al., How photoluminescence can predict the efficiency of solar cells. Journal of Physics: Materials, 2021. 4(4): p. 042010

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Joule, 2021

    Shukla, S., et al., Over 15% efficient wide-band-gap Cu(In,Ga)S2 solar cell: Suppressing bulk and interface recombination through composition engineering. Joule, 2021. 5(7): p. 1816-1831

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Choubrac, and S

    Babbe, F., L. Choubrac, and S. Siebentritt, Quasi Fermi level splitting of Cu -rich and Cu -poor Cu(In,Ga)Se2 absorber layers. Applied Physics Letters, 2016. 109(8): p. 082105

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Thin Solid Films, 2005

    Nakada, T., Microstructural and diffusion properties of CIGS thin film solar cells fabricated using transparent conducting oxide back contacts. Thin Solid Films, 2005. 480: p. 419-425

    work page 2005

  24. [24]

    Applied Surface Science,

    Shin, M.J., et al., Bifacial photovoltaic performance of semitransparent ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 solar cells with front and rear transparent conducting oxide contacts. Applied Surface Science,

    work page

  25. [25]

    Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2023

    Hölscher, T., et al., Effects of ITO based back contacts on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films, solar cells, and mini-modules relevant for semi -transparent building integrated photovoltaics. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2023. 251: p. 112169

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Yin, and M

    Li, Y ., G. Yin, and M. Schmid, Bifacial semi-transparent ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells on ITO substrate: How ITO thickness and Na doping influence the performance. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2022. 234: p. 111431

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Journal of Physics: Energy, 2025

    Choubrac, L., et al., Rethinking CIGS solar cells for rear illumination applications. Journal of Physics: Energy, 2025. 7(2): p. 02LT01

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Applied physics letters, 1994

    Gabor, A.M., et al., High‐efficiency Cu(In x,Ga1− x )Se2 solar cells made from (In x,Ga1− x )2Se3 precursor films. Applied physics letters, 1994. 65(2): p. 198-200

    work page 1994

  29. [29]

    Solar energy materials and solar cells, 2014

    Salome, P.M., et al., The effect of high growth temperature on Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 thin film solar cells. Solar energy materials and solar cells, 2014. 123: p. 166-170

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Thin Solid Films, 2005

    Rockett, A., The effect of Na in polycrystalline and epitaxial single-crystal Cu(In1−x,Gax)Se2. Thin Solid Films, 2005. 480-481: p. 2-7

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    Submitted, 2025

    Valluvar Oli, A., et al., Sodium induced beneficial effects in wide bandgap Cu(In,Ga)S 2 solar cell with 15.7% efficiency. Submitted, 2025

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    2022, Unilu - University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    Adeleye, D., Design of a three -stage process, photoluminescence and defect spectroscopy of Cu(In,Ga)S2. 2022, Unilu - University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg. p. 231

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Rau, and H

    Dullweber, T., U. Rau, and H. Schock, A new approach to high-efficiency solar cells by band gap grading in Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 chalcopyrite semiconductors. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells,

    work page

  34. [34]

    Thin Solid Films, 2017

    Friedlmeier, T.M., et al., High-efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Thin Solid Films, 2017. 633: p. 13-17

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Advanced Energy Materials, 2022

    Wang, T., et al., Diode Factor in Solar Cells with Metastable Defects and Back Contact Recombination. Advanced Energy Materials, 2022. 12(44): p. 2202076

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2003

    Lundberg, O., et al., Influence of the Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 thickness and Ga grading on solar cell performance. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2003. 11(2): p. 77-88

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    Science and Technology of advanced MaTerialS, 2018

    Carron, R., et al., Refractive indices of layers and optical simulations of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Science and Technology of advanced MaTerialS, 2018. 19(1): p. 396-410

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2017

    Raghuwanshi, M., et al., Influence of Na on grain boundary and properties of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2017. 25(5): p. 367-375

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Nat Commun, 2018

    Colombara, D., et al., Sodium enhances indium -gallium interdiffusion in copper indium gallium diselenide photovoltaic absorbers. Nat Commun, 2018. 9(1): p. 826

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Solar RRL, 2020

    Keller, J., et al., Heavy Alkali Treatment of Post -Sulfurized Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Layers: Effect on Absorber Properties and Solar Cell Performance. Solar RRL, 2020. 4(9): p. 2000248

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Control of Na diffusion from soda-lime glass and NaF film into Cu(In,Ga)Se2 for thin-film solar cells

    Cho, D.H., et al. Control of Na diffusion from soda-lime glass and NaF film into Cu(In,Ga)Se2 for thin-film solar cells. in 2012 IEEE 38th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) P ART 2. 2012

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications

    Valluvar Oli, A., et al., Sodium Induced Beneficial Effects in Wide Bandgap Cu(In,Ga)S2 Solar Cell With 15.7% Efficiency. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications. n/a(n/a)

    work page

  43. [43]

    Advanced Energy Materials, 2020

    Siebentritt, S., et al., Heavy Alkali Treatment of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells: Surface versus Bulk Effects. Advanced Energy Materials, 2020. 10(8)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    -K., et al., Na-Diffusion Enhanced p -type Conductivity in Cu(In,Ga)Se2: A New Mechanism for Efficient Doping in Semiconductors

    Yuan, Z. -K., et al., Na-Diffusion Enhanced p -type Conductivity in Cu(In,Ga)Se2: A New Mechanism for Efficient Doping in Semiconductors. Advanced Energy Materials, 2016. 6(24): p. 1601191

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Solar Energy, 2016

    Rühle, S., Tabulated values of the Shockley –Queisser limit for single junction solar cells. Solar Energy, 2016. 130: p. 139-147

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Faraday Discussions, 2022

    Siebentritt, S., et al., Photoluminescence assessment of materials for solar cell absorbers. Faraday Discussions, 2022. 239: p. 112-129

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    APL Materials, 2023

    Prot, A.J.M., et al., Composition variations in Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 solar cells: Not a gradient, but an interlaced network of two phases. APL Materials, 2023. 11(10): p. 101120

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2022

    Sood, M., et al., Near surface defects: Cause of deficit between internal and external open‐circuit voltage in solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2022. 30(3): p. 263- 275

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2012

    Contreras, M.A., et al., Wide bandgap Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with improved energy conversion efficiency. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2012. 20(7): p. 843-850. Supplementary Information Near 13% efficient semitransparent Cu(In,Ga)S2 solar cells with band gap of 1.6 eV on transparent back contact Kulwinder Kaur1*, Arivazhagan Vall...

    work page 2012