pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05950 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ✦ hep-th

The 't Hooft loop from a center-vortex wave functional

D. R. Junior , L. E. Oxman , H. Reinhardt This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords center vorticest Hooft loopYang-Mills theoryconfinementvacuum wave functionalWilson loopSU(N)
0
0 comments X

The pith

The center-vortex peaked infrared vacuum wave functional yields a perimeter law for the spatial 't Hooft loop.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper applies a previously introduced infrared vacuum wave functional for SU(N) Yang-Mills theory, peaked at thin center vortices, to the computation of the spatial 't Hooft loop. The result is a perimeter law for this observable, matching the behavior required by 't Hooft's criterion for confinement. The same wave functional had already been shown to produce an area law for Wilson loops. A sympathetic reader cares because the calculation tests whether one vacuum ansatz can simultaneously satisfy both electric and magnetic confinement diagnostics.

Core claim

Using the infrared vacuum wave functional peaked at thin center vortices, the authors evaluate the spatial 't Hooft loop and obtain a perimeter law, in accordance with 't Hooft's criterion for confinement.

What carries the argument

The infrared vacuum wave functional for SU(N) Yang-Mills theory peaked at thin center vortices, applied to the expectation value of the spatial 't Hooft loop operator.

Load-bearing premise

The infrared vacuum wave functional previously proposed and peaked at thin center vortices remains a sufficiently accurate approximation when applied to the 't Hooft loop observable.

What would settle it

A computation with this wave functional that instead produces an area law for the spatial 't Hooft loop would falsify the claimed perimeter-law result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05950 by D. R. Junior, H. Reinhardt, L. E. Oxman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: chromomagnetic field of a non-oriented con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Dimensionless radial profile h¯ = h/v for λ = 40, ξ = 1, ϑ = 0.01, a = 0.3. In this case, the contribution to γ is 0.24. VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS In Ref. [45], we proposed a wave functional peaked at a center-vortex condensate, which can be represented in terms of a scalar field theory living on a 3D equal-time slice. Because of the presence of not only oriented cen￾ter vortices but also nonoriented one… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Previously, we proposed an infrared vacuum wave functional for $SU(N)$ Yang-Mills theory peaked at thin center vortices and showed that it yields an area law for the Wilson loop. In this work, we use this wave functional to calculate the spatial 't Hooft loop, for which we find a perimeter law, in accordance with 't Hooft's criterion for confinement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the authors' prior proposal of an infrared vacuum wave functional for SU(N) Yang-Mills theory peaked at thin center vortices. Using this functional, the spatial 't Hooft loop is evaluated and found to obey a perimeter law, consistent with 't Hooft's confinement criterion and complementary to the area law previously obtained for the Wilson loop with the same ansatz.

Significance. If the calculation is accurate, the result supplies direct evidence that a single center-vortex-peaked variational wave functional can simultaneously reproduce the infrared behaviors required by 't Hooft's criterion for both the Wilson loop (area law) and the 't Hooft loop (perimeter law). This strengthens the center-vortex picture of confinement within a controlled variational framework and offers a concrete, parameter-free realization of the expected loop behaviors. The approach is noteworthy for its direct reuse of the earlier functional without introducing new fitting parameters.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that a perimeter law is obtained would benefit from a one-sentence indication of the main technical step (e.g., the form of the expectation value or the approximation employed) so that readers can immediately gauge the scope of the derivation.
  2. [Introduction or Section 2] The wave functional is referenced repeatedly from prior work; a brief self-contained recap of its explicit functional form (including any cutoff or smearing parameters) in the present manuscript would improve readability without lengthening the text substantially.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the summary of our results on the spatial 't Hooft loop and the significance attributed to the center-vortex wave functional. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation for input model; new calculation is independent

full rationale

The paper takes its infrared vacuum wave functional (peaked at thin center vortices) from prior work by the same authors, where it was shown to produce an area law for the Wilson loop, and applies it to evaluate the spatial 't Hooft loop operator, obtaining a perimeter law. This constitutes a direct computation of a new observable using the established model rather than any redefinition, refitting, or reduction of the output to the input by construction. The self-citation supplies the starting wave functional but does not bear the load of the perimeter-law result itself; the derivation chain for the new claim consists of the explicit operator evaluation in the given state. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, ansatz smuggling, or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' own prior work are present in the abstract or described structure. The paper is therefore self-contained in its new derivation against the external benchmark of 't Hooft's confinement criterion.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Insufficient information is available from the abstract to identify free parameters, axioms, or invented entities used in the derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5353 in / 1171 out tokens · 52643 ms · 2026-05-10T19:40:19.820353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    we introduced a scalar potentialζ, which contributes to the magnetic field in the form B=∇ ×A− ∇ζ .(14) We constructed then a wave functional that is peaked at the possible realizations of oriented and nonoriented collimated magnetic fluxes and is explicitly given by Ψ(A, ζ) = X {γ} ψ{γ}δ(A−a({γ}))δ(ζ−b({γ})).(15) Here b(x,{γ}) = (−∆) −1∇ · B(x,{γ}) (16) ...

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Wilson, Phys

    K.G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 2445

    work page 1974

  3. [4]

    Tomboulis, Phys

    E. Tomboulis, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2371

    work page 1981

  4. [5]

    de Forcrand and D

    P. de Forcrand and D. Noth, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 114501

    work page 2005

  5. [6]

    Reinhardt, Phys

    H. Reinhardt, Phys. Lett. B 557 (2003) 317

    work page 2003

  6. [7]

    Reinhardt and D

    H. Reinhardt and D. Epple, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 065015

    work page 2007

  7. [8]

    Reinhardt and C

    H. Reinhardt and C. Feuchter, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 105002

    work page 2005

  8. [9]

    Mack and V

    G. Mack and V. B. Petkova, Ann Phys. (NY) 123 (1979) 442

    work page 1979

  9. [10]

    Mack, Phys

    G. Mack, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45(1980)1378

    work page 1980

  10. [11]

    H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 380

    work page 1979

  11. [12]

    Faber, J

    M. Faber, J. Greensite and ˇS. Olejn´ ık, JHEP 01 (2001) 053

    work page 2001

  12. [13]

    Langfeld, Phys

    K. Langfeld, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 014503

    work page 2004

  13. [14]

    Langfeld, H, Reinhardt and O

    K. Langfeld, H, Reinhardt and O. Tennert, Phys. Lett. B 419 (1998) 317

    work page 1998

  14. [15]

    de Forcrand and M

    Ph. de Forcrand and M. D’Elia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 4582

    work page 1999

  15. [16]

    Gattnar, C

    J. Gattnar, C. Gattringer, K. Langfeld, H. Reinhardt, A. Schafer, S. Solbrig and T. Tok, Nucl. Phys. B 716 (2005) 105

    work page 2005

  16. [17]

    H¨ ollwieser, T

    R. H¨ ollwieser, T. Schweigler, M. Faber, and U. M. Heller, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 114505

    work page 2013

  17. [18]

    Trewartha, W

    D. Trewartha, W. Kamleh and D. Leinweber, Phys. Lett. B 747 (2015) 373

    work page 2015

  18. [19]

    Engelhardt, H

    M. Engelhardt, H. Reinhardt, Nucl.Phys. B 567 (2000) 249

    work page 2000

  19. [20]

    Reinhardt, Nucl

    H. Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. B 628 (2002) 133

    work page 2002

  20. [21]

    Kovacs, E.T

    T.G. Kovacs, E.T. Tomboulis, Phys.Rev.Lett. 85 (2000) 704

    work page 2000

  21. [22]

    Lange, M

    D. Lange, M. Engelhardt, D. Reinhardt, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 025001

    work page 2003

  22. [23]

    Langfeld, H

    M Engelhardt,K. Langfeld, H. Reinhardt, O Tennert, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 054504

    work page 2000

  23. [24]

    Engelhardt, M

    M. Engelhardt, M. Quandt and H. Reinhardt, Phys. B 685 (2004) 227

    work page 2004

  24. [25]

    Spengler, M

    F. Spengler, M. Quandt and H. Reinhardt, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 094508

    work page 2018

  25. [26]

    J. A. Mickley, W. Kamleh, D. B. Leinweber, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 034516

    work page 2024

  26. [27]

    L. E. Oxman, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 036018

    work page 2018

  27. [28]

    L. E. Oxman and D. Vercauteren, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 025001

    work page 2017

  28. [29]

    D. R. Junior, L. E. Oxman and G. M. Sim˜ oes, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 074005

    work page 2020

  29. [30]

    D. R. Junior, L. E. Oxman and G. M. Sim˜ oes, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 094021

    work page 2023

  30. [31]

    L. E. Oxman and G. M. Sim˜ oes, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 016011

    work page 2019

  31. [32]

    P. Cea, L. Cosmai, and A. Papa, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 114511

    work page 2017

  32. [33]

    Yanagihara, T

    R. Yanagihara, T. Iritani, M. Kitazawa, M. Asakawa, and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019) 210

    work page 2019

  33. [34]

    Yanagihara and M

    R. Yanagihara and M. Kitazawa, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 9 (2019) 093B02; Erratum in Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 7 (2020) 079201

    work page 2019

  34. [35]

    Lucini, M

    B. Lucini, M. Teper, U. Wenger, J. High Energy Phys. 6 (2004) 012

    work page 2004

  35. [36]

    Athenodorou, M

    A. Athenodorou, M. Teper, JHEP 2021 (2021) 82

    work page 2021

  36. [37]

    D. R. Junior, L. E. Oxman, and G. M. Sim˜ oes, J. High Energ. Phys. 2020 (2020) 180

    work page 2020

  37. [38]

    Stone and P.R

    M. Stone and P.R. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 (1978) 351

    work page 1978

  38. [39]

    Samuel, Phys

    S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 1916

    work page 1978

  39. [40]

    Samuel, Nucl

    S. Samuel, Nucl. Phys. B 154 (1979) 62

    work page 1979

  40. [41]

    Lucini and M

    B. Lucini and M. Teper, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 105019

    work page 2001

  41. [42]

    G. S. Bali, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 114503

    work page 2000

  42. [43]

    Faber, J

    M. Faber, J. Greensite, J., and S. Olejn´ ık, Phys. Rev. D 12 57 (1998) 2603

    work page 1998

  43. [44]

    Greensite, K

    J. Greensite, K. Langfeld, S. Olejn´ ık, H. Reinhardt, and T. Tok, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 034501

    work page 2007

  44. [45]

    D. R. Junior, L. E. Oxman, and G. M. Sim˜ oes, Universe 7 (2021) 253

    work page 2021

  45. [46]

    D. R. Junior, L. E. Oxman, and H. Reinhardt, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 114021

    work page 2022

  46. [47]

    D. R. Junior and L. E. Oxman, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 054036

    work page 2025

  47. [48]

    Ambjorn, J

    J. Ambjorn, J. Giedt, and J. Greensite, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2000) 033

    work page 2000

  48. [49]

    L. E. Oxman, JHEP 03 (2013) 038

    work page 2013

  49. [50]

    Engelhardt, H

    M. Engelhardt, H. Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. B 585 (2000) 592

    work page 2000

  50. [51]

    Engelhardt, K

    M. Engelhardt, K. Langfeld, H. Reinhardt, O. Tennert, Phys. Lett. B 431 (1998) 141

    work page 1998

  51. [52]

    L. E. Oxman, H. Reinhardt, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 177

    work page 2018

  52. [54]

    Kleinert, Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Stat- ics, Polymer Physics, and Financial Markets (World Sci- entific, Singapore, 2006)

    H. Kleinert, Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Stat- ics, Polymer Physics, and Financial Markets (World Sci- entific, Singapore, 2006)

    work page 2006

  53. [55]

    Morse and G.H

    D.C. Morse and G.H. Fredrickson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 3235

    work page 1994

  54. [56]

    ’t Hooft, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 138 (1978) 1

    work page 1978

  55. [57]

    A. M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B 164 (1980) 171

    work page 1980

  56. [58]

    A. L. L. de Lemos, L. E. Oxman, and B. F. I. Teixeira, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 125014

    work page 2012

  57. [59]

    Ebert, H

    D. Ebert, H. Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. B 271 (1986) 188; R. Alkofer, H. Reinhardt, Chiral Quark Dynamics, Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1995

    work page 1986