Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Self-Assembled Telecom Color Centers in Silicon and Their Growth Environment

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ultra-low-temperature molecular beam epitaxy enables controlled self-assembly of telecom color centers in silicon by tuning growth pressure and temperature.

desk verdict ULT MBE self-assembly of specific Si color centers works when pressure is kept low, with PL spectra and positron data backing the reduced background and defects. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.06766 v1 submitted 2026-04-08 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.optics

Jacqueline Marböck , Enrique Prado Navarrete , Merve Karaman , Oliver E. Lang , Thomas Fromherz , Maciej O. Liedke , Andreas Wagner , Moritz Brehm
show 1 more author
Johannes Aberl
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics
keywords siliconcolorcentersself-assemblymolecularbeamepitaxyultra-lowtemperaturegrowthphotoluminescencetelecomemitterspositronannihilationspectroscopyquantumphotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that carbon-doped silicon grown by molecular beam epitaxy at temperatures below 350 degrees Celsius can form specific color centers through self-assembly rather than ion implantation. The authors map how substrate temperature and especially chamber pressure during growth determine which centers appear and how strongly they emit light at telecom wavelengths. Lower pressures reduce unwanted background luminescence by keeping the growth environment clean enough to limit stray impurities and defects. Photoluminescence spectra combined with positron annihilation measurements tie these optical improvements directly to the vacuum conditions maintained during epitaxy.

What carries the argument

Kinetically limited self-assembly of carbon-related point defects into specific color centers during ultra-low-temperature MBE, made possible by a clean vacuum that limits unintended impurity incorporation.

What would settle it

Photoluminescence spectra showing no reduction in background emission when growth pressure is lowered, or positron annihilation spectra showing no corresponding improvement in crystal quality, would indicate that vacuum conditions do not control SiCC formation as claimed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

SiCCs such as the W, G, G', and T centers form by self-assembly during kinetically limited growth of carbon-doped silicon at ultra-low temperatures. Their photoluminescence intensities and the surrounding crystal quality vary with substrate temperature and growth pressure, with lower pressures suppressing background luminescence by maintaining a sufficiently pristine environment that prevents incorporation of background impurities.

Load-bearing premise

The growth chamber can be kept clean enough at ultra-low temperatures that background impurities do not create extra defects that would mask or compete with the desired color centers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Specific telecom color centers can be formed in silicon without the vertical straggle or lattice damage caused by ion implantation.
  • Lower growth pressure directly reduces luminescence background, improving the signal-to-noise ratio needed for single-photon sources.
  • The all-epitaxial process is compatible with existing silicon device fabrication flows.
  • Doppler broadening positron annihilation spectroscopy can be used to monitor how growth pressure affects defect density in the matrix around the centers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could enable monolithic integration of quantum emitters directly into silicon photonic circuits without separate implantation or annealing steps.
  • If the yield of desired centers proves high enough under optimized pressure, the approach may support wafer-scale production of silicon-based quantum light sources.
  • Similar pressure-controlled self-assembly might be tested in other low-temperature epitaxial systems to create different defect-based emitters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a novel all-epitaxial fabrication technique for silicon color centers (SiCCs) based on ultra-low-temperature molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) of carbon-doped silicon. It systematically investigates the effects of growth pressure and substrate temperature on the self-assembly and photoluminescence (PL) properties of W, G, G', and T centers, while using PL spectra and Doppler-broadening variable-energy positron annihilation spectroscopy to demonstrate that lower pressures suppress luminescence background and reduce defect density in the crystal matrix.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work offers a damage-free, scalable route to integrating telecom-wavelength color centers in silicon, directly addressing limitations of ion-implantation methods such as straggle and lattice damage. Credit is due for the internal consistency provided by the combined PL and positron-annihilation data that link growth pressure to background suppression and defect reduction, supplying falsifiable experimental evidence for the role of the growth environment.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and main results: the claims that pressure and temperature specifically impact PL properties and background suppression are stated without accompanying quantitative metrics (e.g., intensity ratios, linewidth changes, or defect concentrations with error bars), which are required to evaluate the magnitude and statistical significance of the reported effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abbreviation ULT should be defined on first use in the main text.
  2. Figure captions for PL spectra and positron data should explicitly state the growth pressures, temperatures, and any normalization procedures used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and main results: the claims that pressure and temperature specifically impact PL properties and background suppression are stated without accompanying quantitative metrics (e.g., intensity ratios, linewidth changes, or defect concentrations with error bars), which are required to evaluate the magnitude and statistical significance of the reported effects.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative metrics would improve the clarity and evaluability of the claims. The manuscript presents the relevant trends through PL spectra and Doppler-broadening positron annihilation data in the figures, but does not extract or report specific numerical values (such as peak-to-background intensity ratios, linewidths, or defect concentrations with uncertainties) in the abstract or main text. In the revised version we will add these metrics, including intensity ratios for the W, G, G', and T centers relative to the background, any observed linewidth variations, and defect concentrations from the positron spectroscopy together with error bars where the data permit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a purely experimental study of ultra-low-temperature MBE growth of silicon color centers. It reports direct measurements (PL spectra, Doppler-broadening positron annihilation) that link growth pressure and temperature to defect density and optical properties. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the provided text. The central claim rests on empirical data rather than any definitional or fitted reduction to its own inputs, making the work self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, new entities, or non-standard axioms are introduced in the abstract; the work relies on established MBE growth and spectroscopic techniques.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of molecular beam epitaxy and photoluminescence/positron annihilation spectroscopy apply without modification.
    The abstract invokes these techniques to interpret self-assembly and background suppression.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Self-Assembled Telecom Color Centers in Silicon and Their Growth Environment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.06766

@misc{pith2026260406766,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Self-Assembled Telecom Color Centers in Silicon and Their Growth Environment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.06766}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.06766}
}
read the original abstract

Artificial atoms based on color centers in silicon (SiCCs) have recently emerged as promising candidates for highly integrable and scalable key components in photonic quantum technology, including telecom single-photon sources and spin memory devices. A novel all-epitaxial fabrication technique for SiCCs, based on ultra-low-temperature (ULT) molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), addresses limitations of conventional fabrication via ion implantation, such as vertical ion straggle and collateral crystal lattice damage. This method solely relies on self-assembly of SiCCs during kinetically-limited growth of (carbon-doped) Si(:C) at ULTs <~350{\deg}C. The latter requires an extraordinary pristine growth environment to prevent unintended defect formation caused by the incorporation of impurities from the background vapor; however, so far, no study has specifically addressed how exactly the vacuum conditions during epitaxy influence SiCC formation, their optical properties, and the quality of the surrounding crystal matrix. Here, we investigate the impact of the growth pressure and the substrate temperature on the self-assembly and photoluminescence (PL) properties of important SiCCs, such as W, G, G', and T centers. Further, we use PL and Doppler broadening variable energy positron annihilation spectroscopy to emphasize the role of the growth pressure in suppressing the luminescence background, which is crucial for advancing quantum photonics applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06766 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. b for the series with undoped Si instead of the Si:C emitter layer. To account for possible unintended SiCC formation within the Si capping layer at relatively low capping temperatures, corresponding reference samples have been grown without the active emitter layer to isolate the contribution of the Si capping layer on the overall luminescence signal. The respective sample structure is pictured in Figure 1c [PITH_… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Low-temperature PL measurements performed at 15 K of fabricated SiCC samples, grown at different pressures and overgrown at different Tcap. (a) - (d) PL spectra for two identically grown samples except for the background pressure during growth pg in the MBE chamber, ultra-high vacuum (UHV) (dark coloring) and high vacuum (HV) (light coloring) for different cap temperatures Tcap = 200°C (black), 250°C (red), 300°C (b… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. c verifies that the self-assembled T Centers (green curve) are fully confined within the 9 nm-thin layers, forming during TG = 200°C, while the increased thermal budget of the Si capping layer growth prevents T-center formation during overgrowth. In the grey reference signal in Figure 3c, no sign of T-center emission is present, and the overall PL count rate is low, implying a good Si matrix quality and T-center for… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: PL spectra of Si deposited at various growth pressures and temperatures. A 50 nm thick Si buffer was grown at 500 - 650°C, followed by 50 nm of Si grown at different temperatures TG = 200°C (black spectra), 300°C (blue), 350°C (violet) and 600°C (orange spectra). Each …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Positron annihilation spectroscopy for Si samples. (a) The S-parameter is a fraction of positrons annihilating with low-momentum valence electrons and represents vacancy-type defects and their concentration. (b) The W-parameter approximates the overlap of the positron …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Epitaxial single T centres in silicon-on-insulator

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Single T centres epitaxially grown in silicon-on-insulator via MBE achieve 30 MHz homogeneous linewidths coupled to nanophotonic waveguides, a ten-fold improvement over implanted references.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Davies, Phys

    G. Davies, Phys. Rep. 1989, 176, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(89)90064-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(89)90064-1 1989

  2. [2]

    Khoury, M

    M. Khoury, M. Abbarchi, J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 131, 200901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0093822

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0093822 2022

  3. [3]

    Redjem, A

    W. Redjem, A. Durand, T. Herzig, A. Benali, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, A. Y. Kuznetsov, H. S. Nguyen, S. Cueff, J.-M. Gérard, I. Robert-Philip, B. Gil, D. Caliste, P. Pochet, M. Abbarchi, V. Jacques, A. Dréau, G. Cassabois, Nat. Electron. 2020, 3, 738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-00499-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41928-020-00499-0 2020

  4. [4]

    Hollenbach, Y

    M. Hollenbach, Y. Berencén, U. Kentsch, M. Helm, G. V. Astakhov, Opt. Express 2020, 28, 26111. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.397377

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.397377 2020

  5. [5]

    D. B. Higginbottom, A. T. K. Kurkjian, C. Chartrand, M. Kazemi, N. A. Brunelle, E. R. MacQuarrie, J. R. Klein, N. R. Lee-Hone, J. Stacho, M. Ruether, C. Bowness, L. Bergeron, A. DeAbreu, S. R. Harrigan, J. Kanaganayagam, D. W. Marsden, T. S. Richards, L. A. Stott, S. Roorda, K. J. Morse, M. L. W. Thewalt, S. Simmons, Nature 2022, 607, 266. https://doi.org...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04821-y 2022

  6. [6]

    S. Wen, G. Pieplow, J. Yang, K. Jamshidi, M. Helm, J.-W. Luo, T. Schröder, S. Zhou, Y. Berencén, arXiv 2025, 2502.07632. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.07632

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.07632 2025

  7. [7]

    H. Song, X. Zhang, L. Komza, N. Fiaschi, Y. Xiong, Y. Zhi, S. Dhuey, A. Schwartzberg, T. Schenkel, G. Hautier, Z.-H. Zhang and A. Sipahigil, Nature Nanotechnology 2025, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-025-02066-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-025-02066-0 2025

  8. [8]

    Nature Reviews Physics , year = 2023, month = jun, volume =

    C. Couteau, S. Barz, T. Durt, T. Gerrits, J. Huwer, R. Prevedel, J. Rarity, A. Shields, G. Weihs, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2023, 5, 326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00583-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00583-2 2023

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, R. Hanson, Science 2018, 362, 303. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9288

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    A. M. Fox, Adv. Quantum Technol. 2025, 8, 2300390. https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202300390

    2025 doi

  3. [11]

    Prabhu, C

    M. Prabhu, C. Errando-Herranz, L. De Santis, I. Christen, C. Chen, C. Gerlach, D. Englund, Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2380. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37655-x

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Lefaucher, Y

    B. Lefaucher, Y. Baron, J.-B. Jager, V. Calvo, C. Elsässer, G. Coppola, F. Mazen, S. Kerdilès, F. Cache, A. Dréau, J.-M. Gérard, arXiv 2025, 2501.12744. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.12744 19

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    Komza, P

    L. Komza, P. Samutpraphoot, M. Odeh, Y.-L. Tang, M. Mathew, J. Chang, H. Song, M.-K. Kim, Y. Xiong, G. Hautier and A. Sipahigil, Nature Communications 2024, 15, 6920 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51265-1

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Dobinson, C

    M. Dobinson, C. Bowness, S. A. Meynell, C. Chartrand, E. Hoffmann, M. Gascoine, I. MacGilp, F. Afzal, C. Dangel, N. Jahed, M. L. W. Thewalt, S. Simmons, D. B. Higginbottom, Nat. Photon. 2025, 19, 1132. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-025- 01752-8

    2025 doi

  7. [15]

    Buzzi, C

    A. Buzzi, C. Papon, M. Pirro, O. Hooybergs, H. Raniwala, V. Saggio, C. Errando- Herranz, D. Englund, Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 8829. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467- 025-63871-8

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    Hollenbach, N

    M. Hollenbach, N. Klingner, N. S. Jagtap, L. Bischoff, C. Fowley, U. Kentsch, G. Hlawacek, A. Erbe, N. V. Abrosimov, M. Helm, Y. Berencén, G. V. Astakhov, Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7683. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35051-5

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    Baron, A

    Y. Baron, A. Durand, T. Herzig, M. Khoury, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, I. Robert-Philip, M. Abbarchi, J.-M. Hartmann, S. Reboh, J.-M. Gérard, V. Jacques, G. Cassabois, A. Dréau, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 121, 084003. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0097407

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    A. M. Day, M. Sutula, J. R. Dietz, A. Raun, D. D. Sukachev, M. K. Bhaskar, E. L. Hu, Nature Communications 2024, 15, 4772 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48968-w

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Davies, S

    G. Davies, S. Hayama, L. Murin, R. Krause-Rehberg, V. Bondarenko, A. Sengupta, C. Davia, A. Karpenko, Phys. Rev. B 2006, 73, 165202. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.165202

    2006 doi

  12. [20]

    S. M. Buckley, A. N. Tait, G. Moody, B. Primavera, S. Olson, J. Herman, K. L. Silverman, S. P. Rao, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and J. M. Shainline, Opt. Express 2020, 28, 16057. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.386450

    2020 doi

  13. [21]

    J. F. Ziegler, M. D. Ziegler, J. P. Biersack, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B 2010, 268, 1818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091

    2010 doi

  14. [22]

    Aberl, E

    J. Aberl, E. Prado Navarrete, M. Karaman, D. Haya Enriquez, C. Wilflingseder, A. Salomon, D. Primetzhofer, M. A. Schubert, G. Capellini, T. Fromherz, P. Deák, P. Udvarhelyi, S. Li, Á. Gali, M. Brehm, Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2408424. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202408424

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    Poempool, J

    T. Poempool, J. Aberl, Ma. Clementi, L. Spindlberger, L. Vukušić, M. Galli, D. Gerace, F. Fournel, Je.-M. Hartmann, F. Schäffler, M. Brehm, T. Fromherz, Opt. Express 2023, 31, 15564. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.480281 20

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    Salomon, J

    A. Salomon, J. Aberl, E. Prado Navarrete, M. Karaman, O. E. Lang, D. Primetzhofer, P. Deák, Á. Gali, T. Fromherz, M. Brehm, ACS Photonics 2025, 12, 2364. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.4c01662

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    Chartrand, L

    C. Chartrand, L. Bergeron, K. J. Morse, H. Riemann,N. V. Abrosimov, P. Becker, H.- J. Pohl, S. Simmons, M. L. W. Thewalt, Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 195201 https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.195201

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    Arakawa, M

    Y. Arakawa, M. J. Holmes, Appl. Phys. Rev. 2020, 7, 021309. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0010193

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    Huber, M

    D. Huber, M. Reindl, J. Aberl, A. Rastelli, R. Trotta, J. Opt. 2018, 20, 073002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/aac4c4

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    R. F. C. Farrow, Molecular beam epitaxy: Applications to Key Materials, Noyes Publications, 1995

    1995

  21. [29]

    Yabumoto, AIP Conf

    N. Yabumoto, AIP Conf. Proc. 1998, 449, 696. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.56895

    1998 doi

  22. [30]

    Auguste, M.O

    R. Auguste, M.O. Liedke, M. Butterling, B.P. Uberuaga, F.A. Selim, A. Wagner, P. Hosemann, J. Appl. Phys. 2023, 133, 185901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0144308

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    Grodzicki, M.O

    M. Grodzicki, M.O. Liedke, K. Moszak, W. Olszewski, Ł. Pawlaczyk, D. Majchrzak, R. Idczak, D. Pucicki, J. Serafińczuk, M. Butterling, E. Hirschmann, A. Wagner, R. Kudrawiec, D. Hommel, Vacuum. 2024, 229, 113554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2024.113554

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    Beaufils, W

    C. Beaufils, W. Redjem, E. Rousseau, V. Jacques, A. Y. Kuznetsov, C. Raynaud, C. Voisin, A. Benali, T. Herzig, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, M. Abbarchi, G. Cassabois, Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 035303. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.035303

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    Binetti, S

    S. Binetti, S. Pizzini, E. Leoni, R. Somaschini, A. Castaldini, A. Cavallini, J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 92, 2437–2445. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1497450

    2002 doi

  26. [34]

    Baron, A

    Y. Baron, A. Durand, P. Udvarhelyi, T. Herzig, M. Khoury, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, I. Robert-Philip, M. Abbarchi, J.-M. Hartmann, V. Mazzocchi, J.-M. Gérard, A. Gali, V. Jacques, G. Cassabois, A. Dréau, ACS Photonics 2022, 9 (7), 2337-2345 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00336

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    Davies, E

    G. Davies, E. C. Lightowlers, Z. E. Ciechanowska, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 20, 191 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/20/2/003

    1987 doi

  28. [36]

    Surma, P

    B. Surma, P. Kaminski, A. Wnuk, and R. Kozlowski, Some new photoluminescence features of W line for neutron-irradiated MCz-Si and FZ-Si, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (IEEE, New York, 2008). 21

    2008

  29. [37]

    Bergeron, C

    L. Bergeron, C. Chartrand, A. T. K. Kurkjian, K. J. Morse, H. Riemann, N. Abrosimov, P. Becker, H.-J. Pohl, H. M. Thewalt, S. Simmons, PRX Quantum 2020, 1, 020301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.020301

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Hakala, M.J

    M. Hakala, M.J. Puska, R.M. Nieminen, Phys. Rev. B. 1998, 57, 7621–7627 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.7621

    1998 doi

  31. [39]

    Assali, M

    S. Assali, M. Elsayed, J. Nicolas, M.O. Liedke, A. Wagner, M. Butterling, R. Krause- Rehberg, O. Moutanabbir, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 114, 251907. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5108878

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Analysis of positron profiling data by means of ‘VEPFIT,

    A. van Veen, H. Schut, J. de Vries, R. A. Hakvoort, and M. R. Ijpma, “Analysis of positron profiling data by means of ‘VEPFIT,” in AIP Conference Proceedings 1991, 218 (1), 171–198, https://doi.org/doi:10.1063/1.40182

    1991 doi

  33. [41]

    Salomon, J

    A. Salomon, J. Aberl, L. Vukušić, M. Hauser, T. Fromherz, M. Brehm, physica status solidi (a) 2022, 219, 2200154. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.202200154

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Wilflingseder, J

    C. Wilflingseder, J. Aberl, E. Prado Navarrete, G. Hesser, H. Groiss, M. O. Liedke, M. Butterling, A. Wagner, E. Hirschmann, C. Corley-Wiciak, M. H. Zoellner, G. Capellini, T. Fromherz, M. Brehm, ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2024, 6 (12), 9029-9039. https://doi.org/10.1021...

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    L. Wind, S. Preiß, D. Nazzari, J. Aberl, E. Prado Navarrete, M. Brehm, L. Vogl, A. M. Minor, M. Sistani, W. M. Weber, Solid-State Electronics 2025, 225, 109069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2025.109069

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    Fuchsberger, L

    A. Fuchsberger, L. Wind, D. Nazzari, L. Kühberger, D. Popp, J. Aberl, E. Prado Navarrete, M. Brehm, L. Vogl, P. Schweizer, S. Lellig, X. Maeder, M. Sistani, W. M. Weber, IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 2024, 12, 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1109/JEDS.2024.3350209

    2024 doi

  37. [45]

    Fuchsberger et al., IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2025, 72, 6, 2868-

    A. Fuchsberger et al., IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2025, 72, 6, 2868-

    2025

  38. [46]

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2025.3559912

    2025 doi

  39. [47]

    Fuchsberger, K

    A. Fuchsberger, K. Eysin, L. Wind, E. Prado Navarrete, J. Aberl, M. Brehm, I. Ratschinski, D. Hiller, M. Sistani, W. M. Weber, IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2025, 46, 8, 1429-1432 https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2025.3577243

    2025 doi

  40. [48]

    Oehme, M

    M. Oehme, M. Bauer, C. P. Parry, G. Eifler, E. Kasper, Thin Solid Films 2000, 380, 75-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01533-9

    2000 doi

  41. [49]

    Attallah, N

    A.G. Attallah, N. Koehler, M.O. Liedke, M. Butterling, E. Hirschmann, R. Ecke, S.E. Schulz, A. Wagner, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020, 308, 110457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110457 22

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    Anwand, G

    W. Anwand, G. Brauer, M. Butterling, H. R. Kissener, and A. Wagner, Defect Diffus. Forum, 2012, 331, 25–40 https://doi.org/doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.331.25

    2012 doi

  43. [51]

    Dryzek and P

    J. Dryzek and P. Horodek, Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. with Mater. Atoms, 2008, 266 (18), 4000–4009 https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2008.06.033

    2008 doi

  44. [52]

    van Veen, H

    A. van Veen, H. Schut, M. Clement, J. M. M. de Nijs, A. Kruseman, and M. R. IJpma, Appl. Surf. Sci., 1995, 85 ©, 216–224 https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/0169- 4332(94)00334-3

    1995 doi

  45. [53]

    Hoppe, F

    C. Hoppe, F. Mitschker, M. Butterling, M.O. Liedke, T. de Los Arcos, P. Awakowicz, A. Wagner, G. Grundmeier, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 475205 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aba8ba

    2020 doi

  46. [54]

    Čížek et al., Phys

    J. Čížek et al., Phys. B Condens. Matter, 2012, 407 (14), 2659–2664, https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.physb.2011.12.122

    2012 doi

  47. [55]

    Tuomisto, I

    F. Tuomisto, I. Makkonen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 2013, 85, 1583–1631 https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1583

    2013 doi

  48. [56]

    , Vol. 127 of Series

    R. Krause-Rehberg, H.S. Leipner, Positron Annihilation in Semiconductors", Vol. 127 of Series "Solid-State Sciences", Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1999

    1999

  49. [57]

    Asoka‐Kumar, K.G

    P. Asoka‐Kumar, K.G. Lynn, D.O. Welch, J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 76, 4935–4982 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.357207 23 Supporting Information Self-Assembled Telecom Color Centers in Silicon and their Growth Environment Jacqueline Marböck*, Enrique Prado Navarrete, Merve Karaman, Oliver...

    1994 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.