arxiv: 2604.07176 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Panchromatic View of the Frigid Jovian Exoplanet COCONUTS-2 b

Matthieu Ravet , Micka\"el Bonnefoy , Ga\"el Chauvin , Zhoujian Zhang , Jacqueline K. Faherty , Ma\"el Voyer , Mark W. Phillips , Pascal Tremblin

show 19 more authors

Rocio Kiman Jessica Copeland James J. Mang Caroline V. Morley Helena K\"uhnle Benjamin Charnay Sam de Regt Paul Molli\`ere Simon Petrus Allan Denis Alice Radcliffe Paulina Palma-Bifani Arthur Vigan Mathilde M\^alin Gabriel-Dominique Marleau Elena Manjavacas Kevin Hoy Elisabeth C. Matthews Thomas K. Henning

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP

keywords COCONUTS-2 bexoplanet atmosphereMIRI spectroscopyself-consistent modelscold giant planetspectral energy distributionmolecular featuresplanetary mass

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

Panchromatic 1-15 micron observations with ATMO2020++ models constrain COCONUTS-2 b to 496 K, 1.03 Jupiter radii, and 7.3 Jupiter masses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper combines a new high signal-to-noise MIRI-LRS spectrum showing clear H2O, CH4, and NH3 features with near-infrared spectra and photometry to build a nearly continuous 1-15 micron spectral energy distribution for the cold exoplanet COCONUTS-2 b. Five grids of self-consistent atmospheric models are tested against the full dataset, with ATMO2020++ (with and without PH3) emerging as statistically preferred even though all grids underpredict flux in the Y and N bands. The best-fit parameters are T_eff of 496 K, log g of 4.30 dex, near-solar metallicity, and radius of 1.03 Jupiter radii; these values plus the known system age then yield a bolometric luminosity and a mass of 7.3 Jupiter masses from cooling tracks. A sympathetic reader would care because the work supplies one of the most complete observational constraints yet on a frigid directly imaged giant planet, testing how well current models handle chemistry and energy balance at low temperatures.

Core claim

The MIRI-LRS data (5.45-11 microns, accounting for 41 percent of the bolometric flux) complete the spectral energy distribution when merged with Gemini/FLAMINGOS-2, JWST/NIRSpec, WISE, and Spitzer observations. Fitting the ATMO2020++ atmospheric model grid to this combined dataset, after accounting for correlated noise via Gaussian processes, produces T_eff = 496^{+5}_{-3} K, log(g) = 4.30^{+0.04}_{-0.02} dex, [M/H] = -0.02^{+0.03}_{-0.02} dex, and R = 1.03^{+0.01}_{-0.02} R_jup. Combined with the system age of 414 ± 23 Myr, evolutionary cooling models then predict a mass of 7.3 ± 0.3 M_jup and a precise luminosity of log(L/L_⊙) = -6.166 ± 0.002 dex.

What carries the argument

Self-consistent atmospheric model grids, especially ATMO2020++, fitted to the full 1-15 micron spectral energy distribution to extract temperature, gravity, metallicity, radius, luminosity, and mass.

If this is right

The MIRI contribution enables a bolometric luminosity precise to 0.002 dex, tightening the mass estimate from evolutionary models.
All five tested model grids reproduce the main molecular absorption features but share a systematic flux deficit in the Y and N bands.
The derived parameters remain consistent with earlier studies once correlated noise is modeled with Gaussian processes.
The presence of strong NH3 absorption confirms ammonia as a detectable constituent in atmospheres near 500 K.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Improving the underpredicted Y- and N-band fluxes in the models would allow tighter constraints on additional opacity sources or vertical mixing.
The same multi-instrument SED approach could be applied to other cold directly imaged companions to build a comparative sample of their atmospheric properties.
A revised system age would scale the inferred mass linearly through the cooling tracks, altering formation-scenario interpretations.
The clear NH3 detection at this temperature provides a calibration point for ammonia chemistry and cloud formation in future model grids.

Load-bearing premise

The self-consistent atmospheric models correctly capture the temperature structure, molecular chemistry, and radiative transfer throughout this cold atmosphere even though they systematically underpredict the observed flux in the Y and N bands.

What would settle it

An independent dynamical mass measurement for COCONUTS-2 b that lies more than 1 M_jup away from 7.3 M_jup at the 3-sigma level would falsify the combination of the derived atmospheric parameters and the cooling-model mass inference.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07176 by Alice Radcliffe, Allan Denis, Arthur Vigan, Benjamin Charnay, Caroline V. Morley, Elena Manjavacas, Elisabeth C. Matthews, Gabriel-Dominique Marleau, Ga\"el Chauvin, Helena K\"uhnle, Jacqueline K. Faherty, James J. Mang, Jessica Copeland, Kevin Hoy, Ma\"el Voyer, Mark W. Phillips, Mathilde M\^alin, Matthieu Ravet, Micka\"el Bonnefoy, Pascal Tremblin, Paulina Palma-Bifani, Paul Molli\`ere, Rocio Kiman, Sam de Regt, Simon Petrus, Thomas K. Henning, Zhoujian Zhang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Top panel: Forward modeling results of the combined COCONUTS-2 b observations. The black solid lines represent the spectroscopic data (from left to right: Gemini/FLAMINGOS-2, JWST/NIRSpec, and JWST/MIRI-LRS) while colored lines represents each Rλ ∼ 100 model ("classic"). Pink and white stars indicate the photometric observations (WISE and Spitzer). Grey-shaded regions indicate the masked wavelengths during… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Top-left panel: Interpolated pressure–temperature (P–T) profiles for models providing a P–T grid (excluding BT-Settl) in Sect. 3.1. Remaining panels: Posteriors of key parameters. Vertical dashed indicate the boundaries of the respective model grids when encountered during the inversion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Corner plot comparing forward modeling using the ATMO2020++ grid with (dark green) and without (light green) Gaussian Processes (GP). Black points indicate the mean predictions from evolutionary models with their associated error bars (see Sect. 3.3). in the FLAMINGOS-2 matrix with correlated noise extending across multiple spectral channels. Its block-like structure arises from the spectral windows used … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We use a high signal-to-noise MIRI-LRS spectrum (5.45 - 11 $\mu$m, R$_\lambda$ $\sim100$) of COCONUTS-2~b revealing prominent molecular features of H$_2$O, CH$_4$ and NH$_3$. This dataset is combined with spectra from Gemini/FLAMINGOS-2 and JWST/NIRSpec (G395H), as well as photometry from WISE and Spitzer, resulting in almost continuous wavelength coverage from 1 to 15 $\mu$m. We analyze the data using five grids of self-consistent atmospheric models, spanning a wide range of T$_\text{eff}$, log(g), and [M/H]. We also investigate the use of Gaussian Processes to account for correlated noise either caused by the spectrograph or by systematic departures of models in the inversion framework. All models manage to fit the overall combined observations but predict fainter flux in Y- and N-bands. Classical model comparison suggests that the ATMO2020++ synthetic specra (with and without PH$_3$) are statistically preferred. Fitting for the correlated noise of the three spectroscopic instruments, ATMO2020++ models yields constraints consistent with previous studies and evolutionary models predictions: T$_\text{eff}$ $=496^{+5}_{-3}$ K, log(g) $=4.30^{+0.04}_{-0.02}$ dex, [M/H] $=-0.02^{+0.03}_{-0.02}$ dex, and R $=1.03^{+0.01}_{-0.02}$ R$_\text{jup}$. The extended wavelength coverage provided by MIRI (accounting for 41% of the bolometric flux) completes the SED, yielding a precise luminosity estimation of log(L/L$_{\odot}$) $=-6.166\pm0.002$ dex. Combined with a previous estimate of the system age ($414\pm23$ Myr), cooling models predict a mass of M $=7.3\pm0.3$ M$_\text{jup}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

MIRI spectrum completes the SED for COCONUTS-2 b and gives a precise direct luminosity, but all model grids still underpredict Y- and N-band fluxes.

read the letter

The main point here is the new MIRI-LRS spectrum that extends coverage to 15 microns and allows a direct integration of the bolometric luminosity to high precision. The atmospheric parameters they derive are consistent with previous work, but the models show clear shortfalls in specific bands. They combined the MIRI data with Gemini FLAMINGOS-2, JWST NIRSpec, and photometry from WISE and Spitzer for nearly continuous 1-15 micron coverage. The spectrum shows clear H2O, CH4, and NH3 features. Five self-consistent model grids were tested, and Gaussian processes were added to account for correlated noise or model-data differences. The ATMO2020++ models are favored, giving T_eff of 496 K, log g of 4.30, near-solar metallicity, and a radius of 1.03 Rjup. The luminosity comes out as log(L/Lsun) = -6.166 ± 0.002, leading to a mass of 7.3 Mjup when combined with the system age and cooling tracks. This is helpful because it supplies a well-observed cold Jupiter as a benchmark for atmosphere models. The direct luminosity measurement is a strength since it bypasses model assumptions for the total output. The soft spots are the systematic underpredictions in the Y- and N-bands by all grids. The N-band overlaps the MIRI range, which provides 41% of the flux, so the GP correction might not fully remove the impact on the fitted temperature, gravity, and radius. The abstract mentions this but gives little detail on the fitting procedure, priors, or error budget, which makes it difficult to judge how much the posteriors could be affected. This paper is for researchers focused on directly imaged exoplanets and testing low-temperature atmospheric models. The new spectrum and luminosity are concrete additions that merit peer review, even if the modeling approach is fairly conventional and could be more transparent.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a panchromatic SED analysis of the directly imaged exoplanet COCONUTS-2 b, combining a new high-S/N JWST/MIRI-LRS spectrum (5.45–11 μm) with NIRSpec G395H, Gemini/FLAMINGOS-2 spectra, and WISE/Spitzer photometry to achieve near-continuous 1–15 μm coverage. Five self-consistent atmospheric model grids are fitted to the data, with Gaussian Processes used to model correlated noise or systematic model–data residuals; the preferred ATMO2020++ grid yields T_eff = 496^{+5}_{-3} K, log g = 4.30^{+0.04}_{-0.02}, [M/H] = −0.02^{+0.03}_{-0.02}, R = 1.03^{+0.01}_{-0.02} R_Jup. Bolometric luminosity is obtained by direct integration of the observed SED (log L/L_⊙ = −6.166 ± 0.002), and mass (7.3 ± 0.3 M_Jup) follows from cooling tracks given the system age.

Significance. If the atmospheric-parameter posteriors are robust, the work supplies one of the most precise characterizations of a cold (~500 K) Jovian exoplanet, with MIRI supplying 41 % of the bolometric flux and completing the SED. Strengths include the use of multiple independent model grids, explicit GP treatment of correlated noise, and direct (model-independent) luminosity integration; these elements allow a clean comparison with evolutionary predictions and prior studies.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (atmospheric modeling): All five grids, including the statistically preferred ATMO2020++ models, systematically underpredict flux in the Y- and N-bands. Because the Y-band lies on the Wien tail and the N-band overlaps the MIRI range that supplies 41 % of the bolometric flux, any residual mismatch not fully absorbed by the GP kernel can shift the joint posterior on T_eff, log g, [M/H], and R. The manuscript does not report quantitative tests (e.g., fits with those bands masked or with varied GP length-scale priors) to demonstrate that the quoted uncertainties (T_eff = 496^{+5}_{-3} K etc.) remain unbiased.
[§4] §4 (results and fitting procedure): The exact likelihood, priors on the free parameters (T_eff, log g, [M/H], R), GP kernel forms for each of the three spectroscopic instruments, and full error budget (including hyperparameter marginalization) are not specified in sufficient detail. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported parameter uncertainties fully propagate the known model–data discrepancies in the Y- and N-bands.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that MIRI accounts for 41 % of the bolometric flux but does not explicitly list the wavelength intervals used for the integration; a short table or sentence in §2 would improve clarity.
Notation for surface gravity is given as both “log(g)” and “log g” in different places; adopt a single convention throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below and describe the revisions that will be incorporated to improve clarity and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §3] All five grids, including the statistically preferred ATMO2020++ models, systematically underpredict flux in the Y- and N-bands. Because the Y-band lies on the Wien tail and the N-band overlaps the MIRI range that supplies 41 % of the bolometric flux, any residual mismatch not fully absorbed by the GP kernel can shift the joint posterior on T_eff, log g, [M/H], and R. The manuscript does not report quantitative tests (e.g., fits with those bands masked or with varied GP length-scale priors) to demonstrate that the quoted uncertainties (T_eff = 496^{+5}_{-3} K etc.) remain unbiased.

Authors: We explicitly note in the manuscript that all model grids underpredict flux in the Y- and N-bands. The Gaussian Process terms fitted to each spectroscopic dataset are designed to capture correlated residuals, including systematic model-data mismatches in specific wavelength regions. The derived parameters remain consistent with independent literature values and with evolutionary-model predictions at the system age, providing supporting evidence that the GP marginalization has mitigated bias. To directly address the referee's concern, we will add quantitative robustness tests in the revised manuscript: (i) refits with the Y- and N-band photometry masked, and (ii) refits with varied GP length-scale priors. These additional results will be presented to confirm that the reported posterior uncertainties are not materially affected. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] The exact likelihood, priors on the free parameters (T_eff, log g, [M/H], R), GP kernel forms for each of the three spectroscopic instruments, and full error budget (including hyperparameter marginalization) are not specified in sufficient detail. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported parameter uncertainties fully propagate the known model–data discrepancies in the Y- and N-bands.

Authors: We agree that §4 would benefit from a more complete technical description of the fitting procedure. In the revised manuscript we will expand this section to specify: the exact likelihood function employed, the prior distributions placed on T_eff, log g, [M/H], and R, the functional form of the GP kernel (including length-scale and amplitude hyperparameters) adopted for the NIRSpec, FLAMINGOS-2, and MIRI spectra separately, and the method used to marginalize or optimize the GP hyperparameters. This added detail will make the full error budget transparent and allow readers to evaluate how model-data discrepancies are propagated into the final parameter uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: luminosity integrated directly, parameters fitted to data, mass from independent cooling tracks

full rationale

The derivation begins with direct integration of the observed 1–15 μm SED (MIRI contributing 41% of bolometric flux) to obtain log(L/L⊙) = −6.166 ± 0.002. Atmospheric parameters are obtained by χ² minimization of five external self-consistent model grids (including ATMO2020++) against the combined spectra and photometry, with Gaussian Processes added to absorb correlated residuals in Y- and N-bands where models underpredict flux. Radius, T_eff, log g and [M/H] are therefore outputs of the fit, not inputs. Mass follows from standard evolutionary cooling models evaluated at the independently measured system age (414 ± 23 Myr). No equation defines a quantity in terms of itself, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing premise rests on a self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem. The analysis explicitly acknowledges model–data mismatches and cross-checks results across grids, keeping the chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Analysis rests on pre-existing atmospheric model grids and evolutionary cooling models; the central claims are obtained by fitting these grids to new data rather than deriving from first principles.

free parameters (5)

effective temperature = 496 K
Fitted parameter from model-grid comparison to spectra
surface gravity = 4.30 dex
Fitted parameter from model-grid comparison to spectra
metallicity = -0.02 dex
Fitted parameter from model-grid comparison to spectra
radius = 1.03 Rjup
Fitted parameter from model-grid comparison to spectra
luminosity
Integrated from the observed spectral energy distribution

axioms (2)

domain assumption Self-consistent atmospheric models (ATMO2020++ and others) accurately represent the temperature, chemistry, and radiative transfer in this cold exoplanet atmosphere
Invoked when selecting preferred models and deriving parameters from spectral fit
domain assumption Evolutionary cooling models correctly map luminosity and system age to planetary mass for this object
Used to convert the measured luminosity into the reported mass

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5818 in / 1769 out tokens · 49127 ms · 2026-05-10T18:10:33.252878+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages

[1]

Ackerman , A. S. & Marley , M. S. 2001, , 556, 872

work page 2001
[2]

1974, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716

Akaike, H. 1974, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716

work page 1974
[3]

K., Su \'a rez , G., et al

Alejandro Merchan , S., Faherty , J. K., Su \'a rez , G., et al. 2025, , 989, 80

work page 2025
[4]

2013, , 558, A109

Alibert , Y., Carron , F., Fortier , A., et al. 2013, , 558, A109

work page 2013
[5]

2005, , 434, 343

Alibert , Y., Mordasini , C., Benz , W., & Winisdoerffer , C. 2005, , 434, 343

work page 2005
[6]

2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 370, 2765

Allard , F., Homeier , D., & Freytag , B. 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 370, 2765

work page 2012
[7]

Allers , K. N. & Liu , M. C. 2013, , 772, 79

work page 2013
[8]

2011, American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 31, 13

Ando, T. 2011, American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 31, 13

work page 2011
[9]

C., Bean , J

August , P. C., Bean , J. L., Zhang , M., et al. 2023, , 953, L24

work page 2023
[10]

Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Rybizki , J., Fouesneau , M., Demleitner , M., & Andrae , R. 2021, , 161, 147

work page 2021
[11]

E., Marley , M

Batalha , N. E., Marley , M. S., Lewis , N. K., & Fortney , J. J. 2019, , 878, 70

work page 2019
[12]

A., Mukherjee , S., Cushing , M

Beiler , S. A., Mukherjee , S., Cushing , M. C., et al. 2024, , 973, 60

work page 2024
[13]

& Seager , S

Benneke , B. & Seager , S. 2013, , 778, 153

work page 2013
[14]

2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed

Benz , W., Ida , S., Alibert , Y., Lin , D., & Mordasini , C. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 691--713

work page 2014
[15]

2024, The Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7028

Blain , D., Molli \`e re , P., & Nasedkin , E. 2024, The Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7028

work page 2024
[16]

Boss , A. P. 1997, Science, 276, 1836

work page 1997
[17]

2016, Statistics and Computing, 26, 383

Buchner , J. 2016, Statistics and Computing, 26, 383

work page 2016
[18]

Cameron , A. G. W. 1978, Moon and Planets, 18, 5

work page 1978
[19]

M., Mandel , K

Czekala , I., Andrews , S. M., Mandel , K. S., Hogg , D. W., & Green , G. M. 2015, , 812, 128

work page 2015
[20]

de Regt , S., Gandhi , S., Snellen , I. A. G., et al. 2024, , 688, A116

work page 2024
[21]

de Regt , S., Snellen , I. A. G., Allard , N. F., et al. 2025, , 696, A225

work page 2025
[22]

2025, , 696, A6

Denis , A., Vigan , A., Costes , J., et al. 2025, , 696, A6

work page 2025
[23]

Dupuy , T. J. & Liu , M. C. 2011, , 733, 122

work page 2011
[24]

K., Burningham , B., Gagn \'e , J., et al

Faherty , J. K., Burningham , B., Gagn \'e , J., et al. 2024, , 628, 511

work page 2024
[25]

& Lodders , K

Fegley , Jr., B. & Lodders , K. 1996, , 472, L37

work page 1996
[26]

C., Rice , E

Filippazzo , J. C., Rice , E. L., Faherty , J., et al. 2015, , 810, 158

work page 2015
[27]

Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2021, , 649, A1

work page 2021
[28]

W., L \'e pine , S., et al

Gaidos , E., Mann , A. W., L \'e pine , S., et al. 2014, , 443, 2561

work page 2014
[29]

P., Aigrain , S., Roberts , S., et al

Gibson , N. P., Aigrain , S., Roberts , S., et al. 2012, , 419, 2683

work page 2012
[30]

& Morley , C

Gully-Santiago , M. & Morley , C. V. 2022, , 941, 200

work page 2022
[31]

C., et al

Hojjatpanah , S., Figueira , P., Santos , N. C., et al. 2019, , 629, A80

work page 2019
[32]

2021, , 652, A67

Houll \'e , M., Vigan , A., Carlotti , A., et al. 2021, , 652, A67

work page 2021
[33]

& Lin , D

Ida , S. & Lin , D. N. C. 2008, , 673, 487

work page 2008
[34]

2023, , 614, 649

JWST TECERST , Ahrer , E.-M., Alderson , L., et al. 2023, , 614, 649

work page 2023
[35]

A., Ruiz Diaz , A., et al

Kiman , R., Beichman , C. A., Ruiz Diaz , A., et al. 2026, , 171, 60

work page 2026
[36]

2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.05392, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.05392

Kipping , D. & Benneke , B. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.05392

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

D., Cushing , M

Kirkpatrick , J. D., Cushing , M. C., Gelino , C. R., et al. 2011, , 197, 19

work page 2011
[38]

D., Martin , E

Kirkpatrick , J. D., Martin , E. C., Smart , R. L., et al. 2019, , 240, 19

work page 2019
[39]

Kuiper , G. P. 1951, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 37, 1

work page 1951
[40]

& Burrows , A

Lacy , B. & Burrows , A. 2023, , 950, 8

work page 2023
[41]

Landman , R., Stolker , T., Snellen , I. A. G., et al. 2024, , 682, A48

work page 2024
[42]

K., Tremblin , P., Phillips , M

Leggett , S. K., Tremblin , P., Phillips , M. W., et al. 2021, , 918, 11

work page 2021
[43]

R., Brogi , M., Bean , J

Line , M. R., Brogi , M., Bean , J. L., et al. 2021, , 598, 580

work page 2021
[44]

2019, , 57, 617

Madhusudhan , N. 2019, , 57, 617

work page 2019
[45]

S., Saumon , D., Visscher , C., et al

Marley , M. S., Saumon , D., Visscher , C., et al. 2021, , 920, 85

work page 2021
[46]

D., Schneider , A

Marocco , F., Kirkpatrick , J. D., Schneider , A. C., et al. 2024, , 967, 147

work page 2024
[47]

M., Leggett , S

Meisner , A. M., Leggett , S. K., Logsdon , S. E., et al. 2023, , 166, 57

work page 2023
[48]

& Fortney , J

Miller , N. & Fortney , J. J. 2011, , 736, L29

work page 2011
[49]

C., et al

Molli \`e re , P., K \"u hnle , H., Matthews , E. C., et al. 2025, , 703, A79

work page 2025
[50]

P., van Boekel , R., et al

Molli \`e re , P., Wardenier , J. P., van Boekel , R., et al. 2019, , 627, A67

work page 2019
[51]

V., Mukherjee , S., Marley , M

Morley , C. V., Mukherjee , S., Marley , M. S., et al. 2024, , 975, 59

work page 2024
[52]

V., Skemer , A

Morley , C. V., Skemer , A. J., Allers , K. N., et al. 2018, , 858, 97

work page 2018
[53]

E., Fortney , J

Mukherjee , S., Batalha , N. E., Fortney , J. J., & Marley , M. S. 2023, , 942, 71

work page 2023
[54]

J., Batalha , N

Mukherjee , S., Fortney , J. J., Batalha , N. E., et al. 2022, , 938, 107

work page 2022
[55]

J., Morley , C

Mukherjee , S., Fortney , J. J., Morley , C. V., et al. 2024, , 963, 73

work page 2024
[56]

& Nordlund , A

Padoan , P. & Nordlund , A . 2002, , 576, 870

work page 2002
[57]

2025, , 701, A208

Petrus , S., Chauvin , G., Bonnefoy , M., et al. 2025, , 701, A208

work page 2025
[58]

2024, , 966, L11

Petrus , S., Whiteford , N., Patapis , P., et al. 2024, , 966, L11

work page 2024
[59]

W., Tremblin , P., Baraffe , I., et al

Phillips , M. W., Tremblin , P., Baraffe , I., et al. 2020, , 637, A38

work page 2020
[60]

Piette , A. A. A. & Madhusudhan , N. 2020, , 497, 5136

work page 2020
[61]

B., Hubickyj , O., Bodenheimer , P., et al

Pollack , J. B., Hubickyj , O., Bodenheimer , P., et al. 1996, , 124, 62

work page 1996
[62]

2025, , 704, A325

Ravet , M., Bonnefoy , M., Chauvin , G., et al. 2025, , 704, A325

work page 2025
[63]

R., et al

Rotman , Y., Welbanks , L., Line , M. R., et al. 2025, , 989, 201

work page 2025
[64]

M., et al

Ruffio , J.-B., Macintosh , B., Konopacky , Q. M., et al. 2019, , 158, 200

work page 2019
[65]

W., Chachan , Y., et al

Ruffio , J.-B., Xuan , J. W., Chachan , Y., et al. 2026, Nature Astronomy [ [arXiv] 2601.08227 ]

work page arXiv 2026
[66]

C., Shkolnik , E

Schneider , A. C., Shkolnik , E. L., Allers , K. N., et al. 2019, , 157, 234

work page 2019
[67]

Schneider , A. D. & Bitsch , B. 2021, , 654, A71

work page 2021
[68]

J., & Berger, J

Sellke, T., Bayarri, M. J., & Berger, J. O. 2001, The American Statistician, 55, 62, publisher: [American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis, Ltd.]

work page 2001
[69]

2004, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol

Skilling , J. 2004, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 735, Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering: 24th International Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, ed. R. Fischer , R. Preuss , & U. V. Toussaint (AIP), 395--405

work page 2004
[70]

Spiegel , D. S. & Burrows , A. 2012, , 745, 174

work page 2012
[71]

2002, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society

Spiegelhalter, D., Best, N., Carlin, B., & \ Van Der Linde\ , A. 2002, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Statistical Methodology, 64, 583

work page 2002
[72]

M., Metchev , S., Faherty , J

Su \'a rez , G., Vos , J. M., Metchev , S., Faherty , J. K., & Cruz , K. 2023, , 954, L6

work page 2023
[73]

& Showman , A

Tan , X. & Showman , A. P. 2021, , 502, 2198

work page 2021
[74]

& Fortney , J

Thorngren , D. & Fortney , J. J. 2019, , 874, L31

work page 2019
[75]

P., Sing , D

Thorngren , D. P., Sing , D. K., & Mukherjee , S. 2026, , 283, 10

work page 2026
[76]

Torres , C. A. O., Quast , G. R., da Silva , L., et al. 2006, , 460, 695

work page 2006
[77]

2008, Contemporary Physics, 49, 71

Trotta , R. 2008, Contemporary Physics, 49, 71

work page 2008
[78]

2006, , 648, 1181

Visscher , C., Lodders , K., & Fegley , Jr., B. 2006, , 648, 1181

work page 2006
[79]

I., & Saslow , S

Visscher , C., Moses , J. I., & Saslow , S. A. 2010, , 209, 602

work page 2010
[80]

Vorobyov , E. I. 2013, , 552, A129

work page 2013

Showing first 80 references.