pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07308 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.IT· math.IT

Recognition: unknown

Delay-Doppler Channel Estimation using Arbitrarily Modulated Data Transmissions

Nishant Mehrotra , Sandesh Rao Mattu , Robert Calderbank
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.ITmath.IT
keywords delay-Doppler channel estimationdata-based estimationspectral efficiencydoubly-selective channelspilot overheadarbitrary waveforms6G modulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Arbitrarily modulated data transmissions can replace dedicated pilots for accurate delay-Doppler channel estimation without sending them in every coherence interval.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Conventional delay-Doppler systems insert pilot frames at every channel coherence interval to track rapid variations, which reduces the fraction of time available for data. This paper proposes estimating the same channel parameters directly from ongoing data symbols that use arbitrary modulation waveforms. The method avoids pilot overhead in most intervals while still capturing the necessary delay and Doppler information. Numerical tests on practical doubly-selective channel models show the resulting spectral efficiency rises by a factor of about 1.8 compared with pilot-based baselines, and the gain holds across several 6G modulation formats. A reader would care because the change directly increases useful throughput in mobile and high-mobility settings without requiring new hardware or waveform redesign.

Core claim

The paper establishes that data symbols modulated with arbitrary waveforms contain sufficient excitation and structure to support accurate delay-Doppler channel estimation, removing the requirement to transmit dedicated pilot frames in every coherence time interval.

What carries the argument

Data-based delay-Doppler estimation that treats arbitrarily modulated transmissions as the probing signal for tracking channel parameters.

Load-bearing premise

Arbitrarily modulated data transmissions contain sufficient excitation and structure to enable accurate delay-Doppler channel estimation without dedicated pilots in every coherence interval.

What would settle it

A simulation or over-the-air test on a practical doubly-selective channel model in which the data-based estimator produces errors large enough that the overall effective data rate falls below the rate achieved by conventional pilot-based estimation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07308 by Nishant Mehrotra, Robert Calderbank, Sandesh Rao Mattu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Frame structure assuming channel coherence time spa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Data-based self-ambiguity function Ax[k, l] approximates an ideal “thumbtack” in expected value for any basis φ. and E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Performance of both systems in Fig. 1 for uncoded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Data-based systems achieve higher spectral efficien [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Performance of data-based systems degrades for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Conventional delay-Doppler (DD) communication and sensing systems require transmitting pilot frames at every channel coherence time interval in order to keep track of channel variations at the cost of spectral efficiency. In this paper, we propose an approach to utilize data transmissions modulated using arbitrary waveforms for DD channel estimation without requiring pilot transmissions in every coherence time interval. Numerical evaluation over practical doubly-selective channel models demonstrate $\sim 1.8 \times$ improvement in spectral efficiency with our proposed data-based approach over conventional pilot-based approaches across various 6G modulation schemes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes using arbitrarily modulated data transmissions for delay-Doppler channel estimation without dedicated pilots in every coherence interval. It claims that numerical evaluations over practical doubly-selective channel models demonstrate approximately 1.8 times improvement in spectral efficiency relative to conventional pilot-based approaches, and that this holds across various 6G modulation schemes.

Significance. If the data-aided approach achieves pilot-comparable estimation accuracy without the associated overhead, the result would be significant for spectral-efficiency gains in high-mobility 6G delay-Doppler systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of a ∼1.8× spectral-efficiency gain is asserted on the basis of numerical evaluation, yet the abstract supplies no description of the estimation algorithm, data-exclusion rules, error metrics, or baseline implementations, preventing any assessment of whether the reported numbers support the central claim.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the weakest assumption—that arbitrarily modulated data transmissions contain sufficient excitation and structure to enable accurate delay-Doppler estimation at pilot-level accuracy without dedicated pilots every coherence interval—is stated without supporting analysis, derivation, or discussion of convergence/error-floor behavior under realistic modulation, SNR, and Doppler conditions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the abstract accordingly to improve clarity and support for the central claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of a ∼1.8× spectral-efficiency gain is asserted on the basis of numerical evaluation, yet the abstract supplies no description of the estimation algorithm, data-exclusion rules, error metrics, or baseline implementations, preventing any assessment of whether the reported numbers support the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's brevity omits these specifics. In the revised version, we will expand the abstract to briefly outline the data-aided delay-Doppler estimation algorithm, mention the data-exclusion rules employed to mitigate interference from unknown symbols, specify the normalized mean squared error (NMSE) metric used for accuracy assessment, and clarify that the baseline is conventional pilot-based estimation with dedicated pilots transmitted in every coherence interval. The full algorithmic details, exclusion criteria, and simulation setups are provided in Sections III and IV of the manuscript, where the ∼1.8× spectral efficiency improvement is quantified over practical doubly-selective channels. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the weakest assumption—that arbitrarily modulated data transmissions contain sufficient excitation and structure to enable accurate delay-Doppler estimation at pilot-level accuracy without dedicated pilots every coherence interval—is stated without supporting analysis, derivation, or discussion of convergence/error-floor behavior under realistic modulation, SNR, and Doppler conditions.

    Authors: The manuscript body contains the supporting analysis, including the derivation of the data-aided estimator and numerical results demonstrating pilot-comparable accuracy across 6G modulations (e.g., OFDM, OTFS variants), with explicit evaluation of NMSE convergence and error floors versus SNR and maximum Doppler spread. However, we acknowledge that the abstract does not reference these aspects. We will revise the abstract to include a concise statement noting that the approach achieves the reported accuracy under the evaluated conditions without dedicated pilots in every interval, and we will ensure the main text highlights the observed error-floor behavior. If desired, we can add a short paragraph on the excitation properties of arbitrary data waveforms. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical simulation of data-aided estimator is self-contained

full rationale

The paper proposes a method to perform delay-Doppler channel estimation from arbitrarily modulated data transmissions and validates the resulting spectral-efficiency gain through numerical evaluation over doubly-selective channel models. No equations or steps in the derivation chain reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation load-bearing premises; the 1.8× improvement is reported as an observed outcome of the simulations rather than a tautological prediction. The approach is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on an unspecified estimation procedure whose assumptions are not stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5390 in / 1073 out tokens · 42513 ms · 2026-05-10T17:28:45.929694+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Integrated Sensing and Com- munications Readiness Report, Phase I,

    Next G Alliance, “Integrated Sensing and Com- munications Readiness Report, Phase I,” Sep

  2. [2]

    Available: https://nextgalliance.org/w hite papers/ integrated-sensing-and-communications-readiness-rep ort-phase-i/

    [Online]. Available: https://nextgalliance.org/w hite papers/ integrated-sensing-and-communications-readiness-rep ort-phase-i/

  3. [3]

    From OTFS to DD-ISAC: Integrating Sensing and Commun ica- tions in the Delay Doppler Domain,

    W. Y uan, L. Zhou, S. K. Dehkordi, S. Li, P . Fan, G. Caire, an d H. V . Poor, “From OTFS to DD-ISAC: Integrating Sensing and Commun ica- tions in the Delay Doppler Domain,” IEEE Wireless Communications , vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 152–160, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani, and A. Chockalingam, OTFS Modulation: Theory and Applications . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    OTFS—A Mathematical Foundation for Communication and Rad ar Sensing in the Delay-Doppler Domain,

    S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani, A. Chockalingam, and R. Calder bank, “OTFS—A Mathematical Foundation for Communication and Rad ar Sensing in the Delay-Doppler Domain,” IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 36–55, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    OTFS—Predictability in the Delay-Doppler Domain a nd Its V alue to Communication and Radar Sensing,

    ——, “OTFS—Predictability in the Delay-Doppler Domain a nd Its V alue to Communication and Radar Sensing,” IEEE BITS the Infor- mation Theory Magazine , vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 7–31, 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Zak-OTFS: Pulse Shapi ng and the Tradeoff between Time/Bandwidth Expansion and Predict ability,

    J. Jayachandran, R. K. Jaiswal, S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani , A. Chockalingam, and R. Calderbank, “Zak-OTFS: Pulse Shapi ng and the Tradeoff between Time/Bandwidth Expansion and Predict ability,”

  8. [8]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405. 02718

  9. [9]

    Delay-Doppler Si gnal Pro- cessing with Zadoff-Chu Sequences,

    S. R. Mattu, I. A. Khan, V . Khammammetti, B. Dabak, S. K. Mo - hammed, K. Narayanan, and R. Calderbank, “Delay-Doppler Si gnal Pro- cessing with Zadoff-Chu Sequences,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04295 , 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Zak-OTFS with Interleaved Pil ots to Extend the Region of Predictable Operation,

    J. Jayachandran, I. A. Khan, S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani, A. Chock- alingam, and R. Calderbank, “Zak-OTFS with Interleaved Pil ots to Extend the Region of Predictable Operation,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, pp. 1–15, 2025

    2025

  11. [11]

    Zak-OTFS to Integrate Sensing the I/O Relation and Data Communication,

    M. Ubadah, S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani, S. Kons, A. Chockali ngam, and R. Calderbank, “Zak-OTFS to Integrate Sensing the I/O Relation and Data Communication,” 2025. [Online]. Availab le: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04182

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Zak-OTFS W ith Spread Carrier Waveforms,

    N. Mehrotra, S. R. Mattu, and R. Calderbank, “Zak-OTFS W ith Spread Carrier Waveforms,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 3244–3248, 2025

    2025

  13. [13]

    A Design Framework That Unifies 6G Modulation Schem es for Double Selectivity,

    ——, “A Design Framework That Unifies 6G Modulation Schem es for Double Selectivity,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 15, pp. 2149–2153, 2026

    2026

  14. [14]

    Different ial Communi- cation in Channels With Mobility and Delay Spread Using Zak- OTFS,

    S. R. Mattu, N. Mehrotra, and R. Calderbank, “Different ial Communi- cation in Channels With Mobility and Delay Spread Using Zak- OTFS,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 3680–3684, 2025

    2025

  15. [15]

    New Detection Sche mes for Transmit Diversity with No Channel Estimation,

    V . Tarokh, S. Alamouti, and P . Poon, “New Detection Sche mes for Transmit Diversity with No Channel Estimation,” in ICUPC ’98. IEEE 1998 International Conference on Universal Personal Commu nications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98TH8384), vol. 2, 1998, pp. 917–920 vol.2

    1998

  16. [16]

    Data Transmission by Freque ncy-Division Multiplexing Using the Discrete Fourier Transform,

    S. Weinstein and P . Ebert, “Data Transmission by Freque ncy-Division Multiplexing Using the Discrete Fourier Transform,” IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology , vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 628–634, 1971

    1971

  17. [17]

    Multicarrier Modulation for Data Transmi ssion: An Idea Whose Time Has Come,

    J. Bingham, “Multicarrier Modulation for Data Transmi ssion: An Idea Whose Time Has Come,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 5–14, 1990

    1990

  18. [18]

    Affine Frequen cy Division Multiplexing for Next Generation Wireless Communications ,

    A. Bemani, N. Ksairi, and M. Kountouris, “Affine Frequen cy Division Multiplexing for Next Generation Wireless Communications ,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 8214– 8229, 2023

    2023

  19. [19]

    DFT-p-FDM A: A Waveform for Doubly Selective Channels,

    N. Ferdinand, J. Cho, C. J. Zhang, and J. Lee, “DFT-p-FDM A: A Waveform for Doubly Selective Channels,” in 2025 IEEE International Conference on Communications W orkshops (ICC W orkshops), 2025, pp. 1055–1060. 7 (a) Bit error rate (BER). (b) Normalized mean squared error (NMSE). Fig. 5: Performance of data-based systems degrades for νmax > 937. 5 Hz where...

    2025

  20. [20]

    Orthogonal Chirp Division Multi plexing,

    X. Ouyang and J. Zhao, “Orthogonal Chirp Division Multi plexing,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3946–3957, 2016

    2016

  21. [21]

    Ge neralized Spatial Modulation Aided Affine Frequency Division Multipl exing,

    Z. Sui, Z. Liu, L. Musavian, L.-L. Y ang, and L. Hanzo, “Ge neralized Spatial Modulation Aided Affine Frequency Division Multipl exing,”

  22. [22]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501. 10865

  23. [23]

    Orthogonal Time Seque ncy Multi- plexing Modulation: Analysis and Low-Complexity Receiver Design,

    T. Thaj, E. Viterbo, and Y . Hong, “Orthogonal Time Seque ncy Multi- plexing Modulation: Analysis and Low-Complexity Receiver Design,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 7842–7855, 2021

    2021

  24. [24]

    Performance Analysis and Approximate Message Passing Det ection of Orthogonal Time Sequency Multiplexing Modulation,

    Z. Sui, S. Y an, H. Zhang, S. Sun, Y . Zeng, L.-L. Y ang, and L . Hanzo, “Performance Analysis and Approximate Message Passing Det ection of Orthogonal Time Sequency Multiplexing Modulation,” IEEE Transac- tions on Wireless Communications , vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1913–1928, 2024

    1913

  25. [25]

    Reshaping the ISAC Tradeoff Under OFDM Signaling: A Probabilistic Con stel- lation Shaping Approach,

    Z. Du, F. Liu, Y . Xiong, T. X. Han, Y . C. Eldar, and S. Jin, “ Reshaping the ISAC Tradeoff Under OFDM Signaling: A Probabilistic Con stel- lation Shaping Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 72, pp. 4782–4797, 2024

    2024

  26. [26]

    CP-OFDM Achieves the Lowest Average Ranging Sidelobe Unde r QAM/PSK Constellations,

    F. Liu, Y . Zhang, Y . Xiong, S. Li, W. Y uan, F. Gao, S. Jin, a nd G. Caire, “CP-OFDM Achieves the Lowest Average Ranging Sidelobe Unde r QAM/PSK Constellations,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 6950–6967, 2025

    2025

  27. [27]

    Reth inking Sig- naling Design for ISAC: From Pilot-Based to Payload-Based S ensing,

    Y . Li, Y . Zhang, C. Masouros, S. Pollin, and F. Liu, “Reth inking Sig- naling Design for ISAC: From Pilot-Based to Payload-Based S ensing,” IEEE Communications Standards Magazine , pp. 1–9, 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Evaluation of the quadratic Gau ss sum,

    M. Murty and S. Pathak, “Evaluation of the quadratic Gau ss sum,” Evaluation, vol. 86, no. 1-2, 2017

    2017

  29. [29]

    Characterization of Randomly Time-V ariant Linear Channels,

    P . Bello, “Characterization of Randomly Time-V ariant Linear Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Communications Systems , vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 360– 393, 1963

    1963

  30. [30]

    Zak-OTFS Implementation via Time and Frequ ency Windowing,

    S. Gopalam, I. B. Collings, S. V . Hanly, H. Inaltekin, S. R. B. Pillai, and P . Whiting, “Zak-OTFS Implementation via Time and Frequ ency Windowing,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 3873–3889, 2024

    2024

  31. [31]

    A Gaussian-Sin c Pulse Shap- ing Filter for Zak-OTFS,

    A. Das, F. Jesbin, and A. Chockalingam, “A Gaussian-Sin c Pulse Shap- ing Filter for Zak-OTFS,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, pp. 1–16, 2025

    2025

  32. [32]

    Pulse Shap ing Filter Design for Integrated Sensing and Communication With Zak-O TFS,

    N. Mehrotra, S. R. Mattu, and R. Calderbank, “Pulse Shap ing Filter Design for Integrated Sensing and Communication With Zak-O TFS,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 15, pp. 2323–2327, 2026

    2026

  33. [33]

    Discrete Radar based on Modulo Arithmetic,

    N. Mehrotra, S. R. Mattu, S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani, and R . Calder- bank, “Discrete Radar based on Modulo Arithmetic,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing , vol. 2025, no. 1, p. 55, 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    Low-Complexity Equalization of Zak-OTFS i n the Frequency Domain,

    S. R. Mattu, N. Mehrotra, S. K. Mohammed, V . Khammammett i, and R. Calderbank, “Low-Complexity Equalization of Zak-OTFS i n the Frequency Domain,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ar xiv.org/abs/ 2508.07148

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Guidelines for Evaluation of Radio Tran smission Technologies for IMT-2000,

    ITU–R M.1225, “Guidelines for Evaluation of Radio Tran smission Technologies for IMT-2000,” International Telecommunication Union Radio communication, 1997

    2000

  36. [36]

    Tse and P

    D. Tse and P . Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication . Cambridge University Press, 2005

    2005