Ten-Second Electron-Spin Coherence in Isotopically Engineered Diamond
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:55 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Isotopically engineered diamond achieves NV-center spin coherence of 6.8 ms in Hahn echo and 11.2 s under dynamical decoupling with near-lifetime-limited optical linewidths.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
In (111)-grown diamond with controlled 13C concentration and low-ppb nitrogen, single NV centers exhibit electron-spin coherence times of T2 = 6.8(1) ms under Hahn echo and T2^DD = 11.2(8) s under dynamical decoupling once 50 Hz noise is removed by real-time feedforward. The same centers show coherent optical transitions with a homogeneous linewidth of 16.9(4) MHz that approaches the lifetime limit, together with mapped spectral diffusion dynamics.
What carries the argument
Isotopically engineered (111) diamond with real-time feedforward noise cancellation and tailored dynamical decoupling sequences applied to single NV centers.
If this is right
- The extended coherence times allow longer storage of quantum information in solid-state spin qubits.
- The near-lifetime-limited optical linewidths support generation of spin-photon entanglement for quantum networks.
- The controlled growth process creates a systematic route to study how specific impurities affect defect coherence.
- Improved spin-qubit control expands practical options for quantum networks and related technologies.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same combination of isotope control and noise cancellation could be tested on other diamond defects such as silicon-vacancy centers to check for comparable gains.
- Achieving uniform isotope profiles over larger areas would be required to scale these single-defect results toward multi-qubit devices.
- The characterized spectral diffusion sets a practical bound on how long optical coherence can be maintained without additional frequency stabilization techniques.
Load-bearing premise
The dominant decoherence sources are exactly the 50 Hz noise and residual 13C spins that the feedforward and decoupling sequences can fully remove, with the stated isotopic concentrations achieved uniformly across the measured defects.
What would settle it
Measuring coherence times in the same NV centers without the feedforward scheme active, or finding that secondary-ion mass spectrometry reveals non-uniform 13C levels in the probed regions, would show whether the reported times truly arise from the claimed mitigation.
Figures
read the original abstract
Solid-state spin defects are a promising platform for quantum networks. A key requirement is to combine long ground-state spin-coherence times with a coherent optical transition for spin-photon entanglement. Here, we investigate the spin and optical coherence of single nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centres in (111)-grown isotopically engineered diamond. Our diamond-growth process yields a precisely controlled $^{13}\mathrm{C}$ concentration and low-ppb nitrogen concentrations. Combined with the mitigation of 50 Hz noise using a real-time feedforward scheme and tailored decoupling sequences, this enables record defect-electron-spin coherence times of $T_2 = 6.8(1)$ ms for a Hahn echo and of $T_2^{DD} = 11.2(8)$ s under dynamical decoupling. In addition, we observe coherent optical transitions with a near-lifetime-limited homogeneous linewidth of 16.9(4) MHz and characterize the spectral diffusion dynamics. These results provide new avenues to investigate the incorporation of impurities in diamond and new opportunities for improved spin-qubit control for quantum networks and other quantum technologies.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports experimental results on single NV centers in (111)-grown isotopically engineered diamond. The growth process achieves controlled low 13C and low-ppb N concentrations. Combined with real-time feedforward for 50 Hz noise mitigation and tailored dynamical decoupling, this yields record spin coherence times of T2 = 6.8(1) ms (Hahn echo) and T2^DD = 11.2(8) s (dynamical decoupling). The work also demonstrates coherent optical transitions with a homogeneous linewidth of 16.9(4) MHz near the lifetime limit and characterizes spectral diffusion dynamics.
Significance. If the results hold, this constitutes a notable advance for solid-state quantum networks by combining long electron-spin coherence with a coherent optical interface suitable for spin-photon entanglement. The direct measurements on individual defects, reported with quantitative uncertainties, provide clear support for the central claims. Strengths include the integration of isotopic engineering with active noise control and the absence of circularity or post-hoc fitting issues in the reported values.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract and diamond-growth description] Abstract and diamond-growth description: The central attribution of the record T2 and T2^DD values to isotopic engineering plus feedforward/DD mitigation assumes spatially uniform low 13C concentration at every probed defect and that 50 Hz noise plus residual 13C are the only significant decoherence sources. The manuscript states that the growth process yields the controlled concentrations but provides no spatially resolved verification (e.g., SIMS mapping) or exhaustive noise spectroscopy to confirm completeness of mitigation and rule out local fluctuations or unaccounted electric/strain noise.
- [Results on coherence measurements] Results on coherence measurements: While the reported values include uncertainties from direct measurements, the manuscript does not present data showing consistency across multiple NV centers or explicit comparisons (with/without feedforward) that would isolate the contribution of each mitigation technique and secure the claim that these sequences fully eliminate other channels.
minor comments (1)
- The dynamical-decoupling coherence time is denoted T2^DD without an explicit definition or reference to the specific pulse sequence parameters in the abstract; ensure this is defined clearly in the main text for reproducibility.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive assessment and recommendation for minor revision. We address each major comment below with clarifications and note the revisions we will incorporate.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: Abstract and diamond-growth description: The central attribution of the record T2 and T2^DD values to isotopic engineering plus feedforward/DD mitigation assumes spatially uniform low 13C concentration at every probed defect and that 50 Hz noise plus residual 13C are the only significant decoherence sources. The manuscript states that the growth process yields the controlled concentrations but provides no spatially resolved verification (e.g., SIMS mapping) or exhaustive noise spectroscopy to confirm completeness of mitigation and rule out local fluctuations or unaccounted electric/strain noise.
Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on rigorously justifying the attribution. The Methods section describes the (111) growth process that achieves the targeted low 13C and low-ppb N concentrations. While spatially resolved SIMS mapping was not performed, the direct single-defect measurements yielding near-lifetime-limited optical linewidths (16.9(4) MHz) and the record coherence times with quantitative uncertainties provide supporting evidence that local fluctuations and unaccounted electric/strain noise are not dominant. We will revise the manuscript to add an explicit discussion paragraph on these assumptions and the supporting optical and spin data. Exhaustive additional noise spectroscopy lies beyond the present scope, but the tailored DD sequences and feedforward target the primary channels; we will clarify this rationale in the revision. revision: partial
-
Referee: Results on coherence measurements: While the reported values include uncertainties from direct measurements, the manuscript does not present data showing consistency across multiple NV centers or explicit comparisons (with/without feedforward) that would isolate the contribution of each mitigation technique and secure the claim that these sequences fully eliminate other channels.
Authors: We agree that explicit multi-center data and with/without comparisons would strengthen isolation of each technique. The primary results focus on representative centers with reported uncertainties, but measurements on additional NV centers show consistent T2 and T2^DD values. In the revised manuscript we will add a supplementary section and figure presenting consistency across multiple centers together with direct comparisons of Hahn-echo and DD coherence times obtained with and without the real-time 50 Hz feedforward. This will more clearly demonstrate the contribution of each mitigation step and support that residual channels are minimized. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: direct experimental measurements of coherence times
full rationale
The paper reports measured values of electron-spin coherence times (T2 = 6.8 ms Hahn echo, T2^DD = 11.2 s under DD) and optical linewidths obtained from isotopically engineered diamond samples. These are presented as experimental outcomes from growth process, feedforward noise mitigation, and decoupling sequences applied to single NV centers. No derivation chain, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, self-definitional equation, or load-bearing self-citation reduces any reported result to its own inputs by construction. The central claims rest on observed data rather than any algebraic or modeling loop.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- standard math Standard quantum mechanics governs the spin and optical dynamics of NV centers in diamond
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
record defect-electron-spin coherence times of T2 = 6.8(1) ms for a Hahn echo and of T2^DD = 11.2(8) s under dynamical decoupling... near-lifetime-limited homogeneous linewidth of 16.9(4) MHz
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.leanalexander_duality_circle_linking unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
When the 13C spin bath is the limiting cause of dephasing, the coherence times are expected to scale with the 13C concentration χ according to T∗2 ∝ χ−1 and THahn2 ∝ χ−1
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
- [1]
-
[2]
C. M. Knaut, A. Suleymanzade, Y.-C. Wei, D. R. Assumpcao, P.-J. Stas, Y. Q. Huan, B. Machielse, E. N. Knall, M. Sutula, G. Baranes, N. Sinclair, C. De-Eknamkul, D. S. Levonian, M. K. Bhaskar, H. Park, M. Lončar, and M. D. Lukin, Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network, Nature 629, 573 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[3]
M. Pompili, S. L. N. Hermans, S. Baier, H. K. C. Beukers, P. C. Humphreys, R. N. Schouten, R. F. L. Vermeulen, M. Tiggelman, L. dos Santos Martins, B. Dirkse, S. Wehner, and R. Hanson, Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid- state qubits, Science 372, 259 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[4]
M. H. Abobeih, Y. Wang, J. Randall, S. J. H. Loenen, C. E. Bradley, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, B. M. Terhal, and T. H. Taminiau, Fault-tolerant operation of a logical qubit in a dia- mond quantum processor, Nature 606, 884 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[5]
S. De Bone, P. Möller, C. E. Bradley, T. H. Taminiau, and D. Elk- ouss, Thresholds for the distributed surface code in the pres- ence of memory decoherence, A VS Quantum Sci. 6, 033801 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[6]
I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, E. Urbach, N. P. de Leon, S. Choi, K. De Greve, R. Evans, R. Gertner, E. Bersin, C. Muller, L. McGuinness, F. Jelezko, R. L. Walsworth, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, Nuclear magnetic resonance detection and spec- troscopy of single proteins using quantum logic, Science 351, 836 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[7]
G. Pieplow, C. G. Torun, C. Gurr, J. H. D. Munns, F. M. Her- rmann, A. Thies, T. Pregnolato, and T. Schröder, Quantum elec- trometer for time-resolved material science at the atomic lat- tice scale, Nature Communications 16, 6435 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[8]
M. H. Abobeih, J. Randall, C. E. Bradley, H. P. Bartling, M. A. Bakker, M. J. Degen, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, Atomic-scale imaging of a 27-nuclear-spin cluster using a quantum sensor, Nature 576, 411 (2019)
work page 2019
- [9]
-
[10]
P.-J. Stas, Y. Q. Huan, B. Machielse, E. N. Knall, A. Suley- manzade, B. Pingault, M. Sutula, S. W. Ding, C. M. Knaut, D. R. Assumpcao, Y.-C. Wei, M. K. Bhaskar, R. Riedinger, D. D. Sukachev, H. Park, M. Lončar, D. S. Levonian, and M. D. Lukin, Robust multi-qubit quantum network node with integrated er- ror detection, Science 378, 557 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[11]
C. E. Bradley, J. Randall, M. H. Abobeih, R. C. Berrevoets, M. J. Degen, M. A. Bakker, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, A Ten-Qubit Solid-State Spin Register with Quan- tum Memory up to One Minute, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031045 (2019)
work page 2019
- [12]
-
[13]
A. J. Stolk, K. L. van der Enden, M.-C. Slater, I. te Raa-Derckx, P. Botma, J. van Rantwijk, J. J. B. Biemond, R. A. J. Hagen, R. W. Herfst, W. D. Koek, A. J. H. Meskers, R. Vollmer, E. J. van Zwet, M. Markham, A. M. Edmonds, J. F. Geus, F. Elsen, B. Jung- bluth, C. Haefner, C. Tresp, J. Stuhler, S. Ritter, and R. Han- son, Metropolitan-scale heralded ent...
work page 2024
-
[14]
Y.-C. Wei, P.-J. Stas, A. Suleymanzade, G. Baranes, F. Machado, Y. Q. Huan, C. M. Knaut, S. W. Ding, M. Merz, E. N. Knall, U. Yazlar, M. Sirotin, I. W. Wang, B. Machielse, S. F. Yelin, J. Borregaard, H. Park, M. Lončar, and M. D. Lukin, Universal distributed blind quantum com- puting with solid-state qubits, Science 388, 509 (2025) , https://www.science.o...
-
[15]
S. L. N. Hermans, M. Pompili, L. D. Santos Martins, A. R- P Montblanch, H. K. C. Beukers, S. Baier, J. Borregaard, and R. Hanson, Entangling remote qubits using the single-photon protocol: An in-depth theoretical and experimental study,New J. Phys. 25, 013011 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[16]
C. Babin, R. Stöhr, N. Morioka, T. Linkewitz, T. Steidl, R. Wörnle, D. Liu, E. Hesselmeier, V. Vorobyov, A. Denisenko, M. Hentschel, C. Gobert, P. Berwian, G. V. Astakhov, W. Knolle, S. Majety, P. Saha, M. Radulaski, N. T. Son, J. Ul- Hassan, F. Kaiser, and J. Wrachtrup, Fabrication and nanopho- tonic waveguide integration of silicon carbide colour cen- t...
work page 2022
-
[17]
M. E. Trusheim, B. Pingault, N. H. Wan, M. Gündoğan, L. De Santis, R. Debroux, D. Gangloff, C. Purser, K. C. Chen, M. Walsh, J. J. Rose, J. N. Becker, B. Lienhard, E. Bersin, I. Pa- radeisanos, G. Wang, D. Lyzwa, A. R.-P. Montblanch, G. Mal- ladi, H. Bakhru, A. C. Ferrari, I. A. Walmsley, M. Atatüre, and D. Englund, Transform-Limited Photons From a Cohere...
work page 2020
-
[18]
L. Orphal-Kobin, K. Unterguggenberger, T. Pregnolato, N. Kemf, M. Matalla, R.-S. Unger, I. Ostermay, G. Pieplow, and T. Schröder, Optically Coherent Nitrogen-Vacancy Defect Centers in Diamond Nanostructures, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011042 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[19]
H. K. Beukers, M. Pasini, H. Choi, D. Englund, R. Hanson, and J. Borregaard, Remote-Entanglement Protocols for Station- ary Qubits with Photonic Interfaces, PRX Quantum 5, 010202 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[20]
M. H. Abobeih, J. Cramer, M. A. Bakker, N. Kalb, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, One-second coherence for a single electron spin coupled to a multi-qubit nuclear-spin en- 13 vironment, Nat Commun 9, 2552 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[21]
N. Bar-Gill, L. M. Pham, A. Jarmola, D. Budker, and R. L. Walsworth, Solid-state electronic spin coherence time ap- proaching one second, Nature Communications 4, 1743 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[22]
C. P. Anderson, E. O. Glen, C. Zeledon, A. Bourassa, Y. Jin, Y. Zhu, C. Vorwerk, A. L. Crook, H. Abe, J. Ul-Hassan, T. Ohshima, N. T. Son, G. Galli, and D. D. Awschalom, Five- second coherence of a single spin with single-shot readout in silicon carbide, Science Advances 8, eabm5912 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[23]
L. Bergeron, C. Chartrand, A. T. K. Kurkjian, K. J. Morse, H. Riemann, N. V. Abrosimov, P. Becker, H.-J. Pohl, M. L. W. Thewalt, and S. Simmons, Silicon-Integrated Telecommunica- tions Photon-Spin Interface, PRX Quantum 1, 020301 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[24]
M. Le Dantec, M. Rančić, S. Lin, E. Billaud, V. Ranjan, D. Flani- gan, S. Bertaina, T. Chanelière, P. Goldner, A. Erb, R. B. Liu, D. Estève, D. Vion, E. Flurin, and P. Bertet, Twenty- three–millisecond electron spin coherence of erbium ions in a natural-abundance crystal, Science Advances 7, eabj9786 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[25]
C. E. Bradley, S. W. De Bone, P. F. W. Möller, S. Baier, M. J. De- gen, S. J. H. Loenen, H. P. Bartling, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, R. Hanson, D. Elkouss, and T. H. Taminiau, Robust quantum- network memory based on spin qubits in isotopically engi- neered diamond, npj Quantum Inf 8, 122 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[26]
E. D. Herbschleb, H. Kato, Y. Maruyama, T. Danjo, T. Makino, S. Yamasaki, I. Ohki, K. Hayashi, H. Morishita, M. Fujiwara, and N. Mizuochi, Ultra-long coherence times amongst room- temperature solid-state spins, Nature Communications 10, 3766 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[27]
R. Samlenski, C. Haug, R. Brenn, C. Wild, R. Locher, and P. Koidl, Characterisation and lattice location of nitrogen and boron in homoepitaxial cvd diamond, Diamond and Related Materials 5, 947 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[28]
L. B. Hughes, S. A. Meynell, W. Wu, S. Parthasarathy, L. Chen, Z. Zhang, Z. Wang, E. J. Davis, K. Mukherjee, N. Y. Yao, and A. C. B. Jayich, Strongly interacting, two-dimensional, dipo- lar spin ensembles in (111)-oriented diamond, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021035 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[29]
R. A. Khmelnitsky, N. B. Rodionov, A. G. Trapeznikov, V. P. Yartsev, V. P. Rodionova, A. N. Kirichenko, and A. V. Krasil- nikov, Problems in homoepitaxial growth of diamonds using cvd method and ways to solve them, Phys. Usp. 68, 3 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[30]
M. F. Brandl, M. W. van Mourik, L. Postler, A. Nolf, K. Lakhmanskiy, R. R. Paiva, S. Möller, N. Daniilidis, H. Häffner, V. Kaushal, T. Ruster, C. Warschburger, H. Kauf- mann, U. G. Poschinger, F. Schmidt-Kaler, P. Schindler, T. Monz, and R. Blatt, Cryogenic setup for trapped ion quan- tum computing, Review of Scientific Instruments 87, 113103 (2016)
work page 2016
- [31]
-
[32]
M. Kamo, Y. Sato, S. Matsumoto, and N. Setaka, Diamond syn- thesis from gas phase in microwave plasma, Journal of Crystal Growth 62, 642 (1983)
work page 1983
-
[33]
H. Watanabe, C. E. Nebel, and S. Shikata, Isotopic homojunc- tion band engineering from diamond, Science 324, 1425 (2009)
work page 2009
-
[34]
I. Aharonovich and E. Neu, Diamond nanophotonics, Ad- vanced Optical Materials 2, 911 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[35]
J. Michl, T. Teraji, S. Zaiser, I. Jakobi, G. Waldherr, F. Dolde, P. Neumann, M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, J. Isoya, and J. Wrachtrup, Perfect alignment and preferential orientation of nitrogen-vacancy centers during chemical vapor deposition di- amond growth on (111) surfaces, Applied Physics Letters 104, 102407 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[36]
M. Lesik, J.-P. Tetienne, A. Tallaire, J. Achard, V. Mille, A. Gic- quel, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques, Perfect preferential orienta- tion of nitrogen-vacancy defects in a synthetic diamond sam- ple, Applied Physics Letters 104, 113107 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[37]
T. Fukui, Y. Doi, T. Miyazaki, Y. Miyamoto, H. Kato, T. Mat- sumoto, T. Makino, S. Yamasaki, R. Morimoto, N. Tokuda, M. Hatano, Y. Sakagawa, H. Morishita, T. Tashima, S. Miwa, Y. Suzuki, and N. Mizuochi, Perfect selective alignment of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Applied Physics Express 7, 055201 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[38]
T. Miyazaki, Y. Miyamoto, T. Makino, H. Kato, S. Ya- masaki, T. Fukui, Y. Doi, N. Tokuda, M. Hatano, and N. Mizuochi, Atomistic mechanism of perfect alignment of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Applied Physics Letters 105, 261601 (2014)
work page 2014
- [39]
- [40]
-
[41]
R. Ghassemizadeh, W. Körner, D. F. Urban, and C. Elsässer, Sta- bility and electronic structure of nv centers at dislocation cores in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174111 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[42]
A. M. Fischer, T. A. Grotjohn, and F. A. Ponce, Cathodolumi- nescence studies of band-a emission in thick undoped diamond epilayers grown on a large miscut substrate,Journal of Applied Physics 137, 145704 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[43]
IUPAC Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights (CIAA W), The isotopic composition of vpdb, Chem- istry International 47, 34 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[44]
Z.-H. Wang and S. Takahashi, Spin decoherence and electron spin bath noise of a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond,Phys- ical Review B 87, 115122 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[45]
T. Shimomura, Y. Kubo, J. Barjon, N. Tokuda, I. Akimoto, and N. Naka, Quantitative relevance of substitutional impurities to carrier dynamics in diamond, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 094601 (2018)
work page 2018
- [46]
-
[47]
T. Teraji and C. Shinei, Nitrogen-related point defects in ho- moepitaxial diamond (001) freestanding single crystals, Jour- nal of Applied Physics 133, 165101 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[48]
A. Tallaire, A. Collins, D. Charles, J. Achard, R. Sussmann, A. Gicquel, M. Newton, A. Edmonds, and R. Cruddace, Charac- terisation of high-quality thick single-crystal diamond grown by cvd with a low nitrogen addition, Diamond and Related Ma- terials 15, 1700 (2006)
work page 2006
-
[49]
T. Luo, L. Lindner, J. Langer, V. Cimalla, X. Vidal, F. Hahl, C. Schreyvogel, S. Onoda, S. Ishii, T. Ohshima, D. Wang, D. A. Simpson, B. C. Johnson, M. Capelli, R. Blinder, and J. Jeske, Cre- ation of nitrogen-vacancy centers in chemical vapor deposition diamond for sensing applications, New Journal of Physics 24, 033030 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[50]
V. Mortet and A. Leschiutta, Experimental insights into im- purity incorporation in chemical vapor deposition doped di- amond, physica status solidi (a) 223, 2500461 (2026)
work page 2026
-
[51]
M. W. Kelly, B. S. Truscott, K. J. Potter, Y. A. Mankelevich, and M. N. R. Ashfold, Can a ground-state nitrogen atom impinging on a c(100)-2 × 1:h diamond surface insert directly into a sur- 14 face c–c bond?, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 121, 7363 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[52]
L. M. Oberg, M. Batzer, A. Stacey, and M. W. Doherty, Nitrogen overgrowth as a catalytic mechanism during diamond chemi- cal vapour deposition, Carbon 178, 606 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[53]
B. S. Truscott, M. W. Kelly, K. J. Potter, M. N. R. Ashfold, and Y. A. Mankelevich, Microwave plasma-activated chemical va- por deposition of nitrogen-doped diamond. ii: Ch4/n2/h2 plas- mas, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 120, 8537 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[54]
M. N. Ashfold and Y. A. Mankelevich, Two-dimensional model- ing of diamond growth by microwave plasma activated chem- ical vapor deposition: Effects of pressure, absorbed power and the beneficial role of nitrogen on diamond growth, Diamond and Related Materials 137, 110097 (2023)
work page 2023
- [55]
-
[56]
J. P. Hadden, J. P. Harrison, A. C. Stanley-Clarke, L. Marseglia, Y.-L. D. Ho, B. R. Patton, J. L. O’Brien, and J. G. Rarity, Strongly enhanced photon collection from diamond defect centers un- der microfabricated integrated solid immersion lenses, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 241901 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[57]
N. Zhao, S.-W. Ho, and R.-B. Liu, Decoherence and dynamical decoupling control of nitrogen vacancy center electron spins in nuclear spin baths, Phys. Rev. B 85, 115303 (2012)
work page 2012
-
[58]
S. Kanai, F. J. Heremans, H. Seo, G. Wolfowicz, C. P. Ander- son, S. E. Sullivan, M. Onizhuk, G. Galli, D. D. Awschalom, and H. Ohno, Generalized scaling of spin qubit coherence in over 12,000 host materials, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2121808119 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[59]
J. C. Marcks, M. Onizhuk, N. Delegan, Y.-X. Wang, M. Fukami, M. Watts, A. A. Clerk, F. J. Heremans, G. Galli, and D. D. Awschalom, Guiding diamond spin qubit growth with compu- tational methods, Physical Review Materials 8, 026204 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[60]
G. Balasubramanian, P. Neumann, D. Twitchen, M. Markham, R. Kolesov, N. Mizuochi, J. Isoya, J. Achard, J. Beck, J. Tissler, V. Jacques, P. R. Hemmer, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Ultra- long spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond, Nature Materials 8, 383 (2009)
work page 2009
-
[61]
T. Ishikawa, K.-M. C. Fu, C. Santori, V. M. Acosta, R. G. Beau- soleil, H. Watanabe, S. Shikata, and K. M. Itoh, Optical and Spin Coherence Properties of Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers Placed in a 100 nm Thick Isotopically Purified Diamond Layer, Nano Let- ters 12, 2083 (2012)
work page 2083
-
[62]
C. A. Ryan, J. S. Hodges, and D. G. Cory, Robust Decoupling Techniques to Extend Quantum Coherence in Diamond, Phys- ical Review Letters 105, 200402 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[63]
R. de Sousa, Electron Spin as a Spectrometer of Nuclear- Spin Noise and Other Fluctuations, in Electron Spin Resonance and Related Phenomena in Low-Dimensional Structures , edited by M. Fanciulli (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009) pp. 183– 220
work page 2009
-
[64]
G. De Lange, Z. H. Wang, D. Ristè, V. V. Dobrovitski, and R. Hanson, Universal Dynamical Decoupling of a Single Solid- State Spin from a Spin Bath, Science 330, 60 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[65]
M. J. Biercuk and H. Bluhm, Phenomenological study of deco- herence in solid-state spin qubits due to nuclear spin diffusion, Physical Review B 83, 235316 (2011)
work page 2011
- [66]
-
[67]
G. L. van de Stolpe, L. J. Feije, S. J. H. Loenen, A. Das, G. M. Timmer, T. W. de Jong, and T. H. Taminiau, Check-probe spec- troscopy of lifetime-limited emitters in bulk-grown silicon car- bide, npj Quantum Information 11, 31 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[68]
M. J. Degen, S. J. H. Loenen, H. P. Bartling, C. E. Bradley, A. L. Meinsma, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, En- tanglement of dark electron-nuclear spin defects in diamond, Nat Commun 12, 3470 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[69]
B. McCullian, H. Cheung, H. Chen, and G. Fuchs, Quantifying the Spectral Diffusion of N- V Centers by Symmetry, Physical Review Applied 18, 064011 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[70]
R. Blinder, Y. Mindarava, T. H. Tran, A. Momenzadeh, S. Yang, P. Siyushev, H. Sumiya, K. Tamasaku, T. Osaka, N. Morishita, H. Takizawa, S. Onoda, H. Hara, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and J. Isoya, Reducing inhomogeneous broadening of spin and op- tical transitions of nitrogen-vacancy centers in high-pressure, high-temperature diamond, Communications Materia...
work page 2024
-
[71]
H. Bernien, B. Hensen, W. Pfaff, G. Koolstra, M. S. Blok, L. Rob- ledo, T. H. Taminiau, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, L. Chil- dress, and R. Hanson, Heralded entanglement between solid- state qubits separated by three metres, Nature 497, 86 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[72]
J. M. Brevoord, L. De Santis, T. Yamamoto, M. Pasini, N. Co- dreanu, T. Turan, H. K. Beukers, C. Waas, and R. Hanson, Her- alded initialization of charge state and optical-transition fre- quency of diamond tin-vacancy centers, Physical Review Ap- plied 21, 054047 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[73]
L. Robledo, L. Childress, H. Bernien, B. Hensen, P. F. A. Alke- made, and R. Hanson, High-fidelity projective read-out of a solid-state spin quantum register, Nature 477, 574 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[74]
C. Bowness, S. A. Meynell, M. Dobinson, C. Clear, K. Jooya, N. Brunelle, M. Keshavarz, K. Boos, M. Gascoine, S. Taher- izadegan, C. Simon, M. L. Thewalt, S. Simmons, and D. B. Hig- ginbottom, Laser-Induced Spectral Diffusion and Excited-State Mixing of Silicon T Centers, PRX Quantum 6, 030350 (2025)
work page 2025
- [75]
-
[76]
C. W. Chow and K. L. Liu, Fokker–Planck equation and subd- iffusive fractional Fokker–Planck equation of bistable systems with sinks, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applica- tions 341, 87 (2004)
work page 2004
-
[77]
J. Walker, Optical absorption and luminescence in diamond, Reports on Progress in Physics 42, 1605 (1979)
work page 1979
-
[78]
I. Kiflawi, A. T. Collins, K. Iakoubovskii, and D. Fisher, Elec- tron irradiation and the formation of vacancy–interstitial pairs in diamond, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 19, 046216 (2007)
work page 2007
-
[79]
J. Rosa, M. Vaněček, M. Nesládek, and L. M. Stals, Photoioniza- tion cross-section of dominant defects in CVD diamond, Dia- mond and Related Materials 8, 721 (1999)
work page 1999
-
[80]
J. C. Marcks, M. Onizhuk, Y.-X. Wang, Y. Zhu, Y. Jin, B. S. Soloway, M. Fukami, N. Delegan, F. J. Heremans, A. A. Clerk, G. Galli, and D. D. Awschalom, Quantum Spin Probe of Single Charge Dynamics, Physical Review Letters 133, 130802 (2024)
work page 2024
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.