pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07682 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🪐 quant-ph

Control-centric quantum noise spectroscopy of time-ordered polyspectra

Kaiah Steven , Elliot Coupe , Qi Yu , Gerardo A. Paz-Silva This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum noise spectroscopytime-ordered polyspectracontrol filter functionsfrequency-comb protocolsopen quantum systemsGaussian noisenon-Gaussian noisedecoherence
0
0 comments X

The pith

A control-centric reformulation lets quantum noise spectroscopy focus on time-ordered polyspectra, removing time-ordering constraints from control filter functions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that shifting to a control-centric viewpoint recasts the quantum noise spectroscopy problem so that time-ordered polyspectra become the central objects of study. In this framing, control filter functions no longer carry the burden of time-ordering, which had previously restricted their applicability. This change makes it possible to extend frequency-comb protocols to arbitrary control sequences without adding symmetries that would erase time-ordering information from the filters. The approach matters for practical quantum devices because it supports accurate noise characterization under realistic control limits that often cause standard methods to fail. Simulations confirm targeted reconstruction of the polyspectra for both classical Gaussian and quantum non-Gaussian noise environments.

Core claim

By adopting a control-centric point of view, the noise spectroscopy problem is recast such that the central objects are the time-ordered polyspectra and control filter functions are no longer encumbered by time-ordering. This enables the seamless generalisation of frequency-comb QNS protocols to arbitrary control scenarios without introducing additional control symmetries that effectively remove time-ordering from filter functions, improving estimation in typically pathological scenarios. The targeted reconstruction of the time-ordered polyspectra is demonstrated across classical Gaussian and quantum non-Gaussian environments via simulations.

What carries the argument

The control-centric recasting of the quantum noise spectroscopy problem, in which time-ordered polyspectra are the central objects and control filter functions are modified to eliminate time-ordering encumbrance.

If this is right

  • Frequency-comb QNS protocols apply directly to arbitrary control sequences without extra symmetries.
  • Noise estimation improves in control scenarios previously considered pathological.
  • Time-ordered polyspectra can be targeted for reconstruction in both Gaussian and non-Gaussian environments.
  • Noise characterization proceeds under realistic experimental control constraints.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could support design of control pulses that specifically target and suppress known time-ordered noise correlations.
  • It may integrate with other quantum control tools to refine decoherence mitigation in hardware.
  • Hardware tests could identify further adjustments needed for finite pulse times or calibration errors.

Load-bearing premise

That the time-ordered polyspectra remain reconstructible from the modified filter functions for arbitrary controls and that simulation results generalize to physical quantum systems beyond the tested cases.

What would settle it

A physical experiment in which a frequency-comb protocol under arbitrary controls using the modified filter functions fails to reconstruct the known time-ordered polyspectra of the environment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07682 by Elliot Coupe, Gerardo A. Paz-Silva, Kaiah Steven, Qi Yu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Two-dimensional frequency-space representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of theoretical and reconstructed time-ordered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison of theoretical and reconstructed time-ordered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Symmetry-resolved reconstruction of third-order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Closed-time-path contour and its unfolded representation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Heat maps of the filter function matrices [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Precise environmental-noise characterisation in open quantum systems is a key step toward high-fidelity quantum control and targeted decoherence suppression in computing and sensing applications. Non-parametric quantum noise spectroscopy (QNS) provides a general-purpose, model-agnostic framework for estimating the spectral properties of an environment. The ability to perform such protocols under realistic constraints is key to their practical applicability. Notably, it is important to account for control constraints and understand how they limit the ability to learn about noise correlations as experiment-agnostic objects. We show how adopting a control-centric point of view allows one to recast the noise spectroscopy problem in such a way that (i) the central objects are now the time-ordered polyspectra, (ii) control filter functions are no longer encumbered by time-ordering. In particular, we show that this approach enables the seamless generalisation of frequency-comb QNS protocols to arbitrary control scenarios without introducing additional control symmetries that effectively remove time-ordering from filter functions, improving estimation in typically pathological scenarios. We demonstrate the targeted reconstruction of the time-ordered polyspectra across classical Gaussian and quantum non-Gaussian environments via simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a control-centric reformulation of quantum noise spectroscopy (QNS) in which the central objects become the time-ordered polyspectra rather than conventional noise spectra. This shift removes time-ordering constraints from the control filter functions, enabling the direct extension of frequency-comb QNS protocols to arbitrary control sequences without imposing extra symmetries that would otherwise eliminate time-ordering. The approach is claimed to improve estimation performance in pathological control scenarios, with supporting evidence provided by numerical simulations reconstructing the polyspectra for both classical Gaussian and quantum non-Gaussian environments.

Significance. If the mapping from time-ordered polyspectra to observed signals remains invertible for arbitrary controls, the reformulation would meaningfully expand the practical scope of non-parametric QNS by relaxing the need for specially engineered symmetric controls, which are often infeasible in real devices. The simulation results offer initial support for the targeted reconstruction in the tested noise classes, strengthening the case for broader applicability in quantum control and sensing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and theoretical reformulation] The central claim of seamless generalization to arbitrary controls (stated in the abstract) rests on the assumption that the modified filter functions preserve reconstructibility of the time-ordered polyspectra. No explicit invertibility conditions, rank analysis of the resulting linear system, or proof that the extraction remains well-conditioned for all physically allowed controls are supplied; this is load-bearing for the asserted improvement in pathological scenarios.
  2. [Simulation results] The simulation section demonstrates successful reconstruction for the chosen Gaussian and non-Gaussian test cases, but provides no systematic exploration of control sequences that could render the linear mapping rank-deficient or ill-conditioned, leaving the scope of the claimed advantage unquantified.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the time-ordered polyspectra and the modified filter functions could be introduced with a dedicated table or equation list to improve readability when comparing to prior QNS literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and theoretical reformulation] The central claim of seamless generalization to arbitrary controls (stated in the abstract) rests on the assumption that the modified filter functions preserve reconstructibility of the time-ordered polyspectra. No explicit invertibility conditions, rank analysis of the resulting linear system, or proof that the extraction remains well-conditioned for all physically allowed controls are supplied; this is load-bearing for the asserted improvement in pathological scenarios.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of invertibility would strengthen the central claim. The reformulation moves time-ordering into the polyspectra themselves, so that the filter functions become ordinary (unordered) objects whose linear mapping to the measured signals is inherited from the standard cumulant expansion. Nevertheless, the manuscript does not currently supply rank conditions or conditioning bounds for arbitrary controls. In the revised version we will add a short subsection that (i) states the precise linear system relating the time-ordered polyspectra to the observed expectation values, (ii) gives sufficient conditions on the control filter functions for the mapping to remain full rank, and (iii) provides a brief conditioning analysis for representative pathological controls. These additions will directly support the asserted improvement without altering the existing theoretical development. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Simulation results] The simulation section demonstrates successful reconstruction for the chosen Gaussian and non-Gaussian test cases, but provides no systematic exploration of control sequences that could render the linear mapping rank-deficient or ill-conditioned, leaving the scope of the claimed advantage unquantified.

    Authors: We concur that the current simulations, while supportive, do not systematically map the boundaries of the method. In the revised manuscript we will augment the numerical section with additional control sequences chosen to approach potential rank deficiency (e.g., highly asymmetric or near-commuting pulse trains) and will report the condition numbers of the associated linear systems. This will quantify the regimes in which the advantage over symmetry-constrained protocols persists and will make the scope of the claimed improvement explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Control-centric reformulation of QNS to time-ordered polyspectra introduces no circular derivation steps.

full rationale

The paper recasts the quantum noise spectroscopy problem via a control-centric viewpoint, shifting central objects to time-ordered polyspectra while decoupling time-ordering from filter functions. This permits generalization of frequency-comb protocols to arbitrary controls, as shown through direct simulation demonstrations on Gaussian and non-Gaussian environments. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs: there are no self-definitional loops (e.g., polyspectra defined in terms of the very filter functions being modified), no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no uniqueness theorems or ansatzes smuggled via self-citation chains. The derivation remains self-contained against external simulation benchmarks, with the claimed invertibility for arbitrary controls validated empirically rather than assumed tautologically.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on reinterpreting standard open-quantum-system noise spectroscopy through control filter functions; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard framework of open quantum systems and filter-function formalism for noise spectroscopy
    The paper builds directly on established QNS literature for the definition of polyspectra and control filters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5499 in / 1174 out tokens · 37305 ms · 2026-05-10T18:30:17.567022+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The linear equation matrices formed by the system of equations are labelledG zz andG zx, respec- tively

    Numerical demonstration and iterative algorithm By constructing a set ofN s distinct filter functions {F (j)}Ns j=1, whereN s ≥N h exceeds the number of harmon- ics to estimate (up to some finite cutoffω max), we construct a linear system to determine the relevant sampling points of the principal domainD. The linear equation matrices formed by the system ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    5 (a)Re[ ˜S(ω)] [105 s−1] Theory Reconstruction Kramers-Kronig 2τ c 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 -1 -0.5 0 (b) ω/ω h Im[ ˜S(ω)] [105 s−1] FIG. 2. Comparison of theoretical and reconstructed time-ordered spectra ˜S(+)(ω)for classical Gaussian noise.(a)Real component Re[ ˜S(+)(ω)]. The initial comb spacing misses a sharp sub-harmonic feature in the interval(3ω h,4ω h), ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    This non-commutativity generates additional quantum contributions to the reduced dynamics through commutator bracket cumulants{B(t 1), B(t2)}− C, which vanish identically for classical noise processes. We adopt a minimal model consisting of an auxiliary bath qubit with an interaction that couples to multiple system axes, B(t) =β 2(t)(Λx + Λz),(26) whereβ(...

    work page

  4. [4]

    These higher-order correlations introduce discrete symmetries in the interaction dynamics, which are inherited by the principal domains of the associated polyspectra

    Bispectrum estimation Non-Gaussian statistics arising fromβ 2(t)generate non- zero bath noise cumulants of orderk≥3. These higher-order correlations introduce discrete symmetries in the interaction dynamics, which are inherited by the principal domains of the associated polyspectra. The control-centric perspective insists that theobservablesystem response...

    work page

  5. [5]

    8 1 (b)Im[ ˜S(++) zzz (⃗ ω2)] [105 s−1] Theory Reconstruction (1,0) (1,1) (1,2) (1,3) (1,4) (2,0) (2,1) (2,2) (2,3) (3,0) (3,1) (3,2) (4,0) (4,1) (2,-1) (3,-1) (4,-1) (4,-2) 0 2 4 (d) (ω 1/ω h, ω 2/ω h) Im[ ˜S(++) xzz (⃗ ω2)] [105 s−1] FIG. 4. Symmetry-resolved reconstruction of third-order(k= 3)time-ordered bispectra ˜S(++)(⃗ ω2)for non-Gaussian quantum ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Preliminaries We consider an open quantum system with Hilbert spaceH S of dimensiond s coupled to a bathH B. The total Hamiltonian in the laboratory frame is H(lab)(t) =H S +H B +H (lab) SB (t) +H (lab) ctrl (t), whereH S andH B generate the free system and bath dynamics, andH (lab) ctrl (t)acts non-trivially onH S. The system–bath interaction H(lab) SB (...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Reduced Dynamics and the Effective Propagator LetO∈ B(H S)be an invertible system observable. For an initially uncorrelated system–bath stateρ(0) =ρ S ⊗ρ B, the expectation value at timeTis ⟨O(T)⟩= D TrSB h U(lab)(T) (ρS ⊗ρ B)U (lab)†(T) (O⊗1 B) iE c ,(A1) where⟨·⟩ c averages over classical noise realisations. To isolate the noise-induced dynamics, we tra...

    work page

  8. [8]

    re-folds

    Cumulant Expansion Applying the cumulant expansion to Eq. (A5) yields VΛα(T) = exp −i ∞X k=1 ˆI(k) α (T) ! ,(A7) where thek th-order contribution is ˆI(k) α (T) = Z T −T d>⃗t[k] C(k)(HΛα(t1), . . . , HΛα(tk)), 21 withC (k) thek th-order cumulant and R d>⃗t[k] denoting integration over the simplext 1 > t 2 >· · ·> t k. We transform the integration domain f...

    work page

  9. [9]

    (A8) for the effective interaction Eq

    Moment Expansion and Projection We seek to disentangle the control, system, and bath contributions of the reduced dynamics in Eq. (A8) for the effective interaction Eq. (A2) of a general orthonormal operator basis. Thek th-order cumulantC (k) is expanded into moments using the relation for non-commuting operators C(k)(X1, . . . , Xk) = X π∈OP({1,...,k}) µ...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Frequency-Comb Approximation To linearise the spectral expression forI (k) α,γ(T), we invoke the comb-approximation, where we divide the time interval T=M τ c intoMrepetitions of a base sequence with periodτ c. Provided a smooth fundamental filter function,F (k) a,b(⃗ ω, τc), takingM≫1the comb-approximation enables the factorisation F (k) a,b(⃗ ω, M τc) =...

    work page

  11. [11]

    19 from the main text ⟨VΛα(T)⟩= exp   Iα,1 (T)I+ X j∈{x,y,z} Iα,j(T)Λ j   

    Direct calculation ofI z,γ(T)fora∈ {x, y, z} In the case of general interaction control axesa={x, y, z}, the overlap integrals forα=z-axis measurements are Iz,1 (T) =− 1 4π Z R dω(F yy(ω, T) +F xx(ω, T)) ˜S(+)(ω) + 1 3!(2π)2 Z R 2 d⃗ ω2 h (Fxzy(⃗ ω2, T) +F yzx(⃗ ω2, T)) ˜S(++)(⃗ ω2) −(F xyz(⃗ ω2, T)−F yxz(⃗ ω2, T)) ˜S(−−)(⃗ ω2) i Iz,x(T) =− i 4π Z R dωFyz...

    work page

  12. [12]

    The parameterst j,A j ∈[−π, π], andΩ j specify the start time, amplitude, and temporal width of thejth pulse, respectively

    Pulse parametrisation Each control sequence comprises a train ofN p pulses with a cosine envelope, f(t) = NpX j=1 Aj Ωj cos π+ 2π(t−t j) Ωj + 1 1[tj ,tj+Ωj](t),(E1) where1 [a,b](t)denotes the indicator function on the interval[a, b]. The parameterst j,A j ∈[−π, π], andΩ j specify the start time, amplitude, and temporal width of thejth pulse, respectively....

    work page

  13. [13]

    III A) and quantum non-Gaussian (Sec

    Second-order spectra Table I details the control sequences used to reconstruct the second-order time-ordered spectra ˜S(±)(ω)for the classical Gaussian (Sec. III A) and quantum non-Gaussian (Sec. III B) environments. Sequencess= 1–8are designed to reconstruct the real componentRe[ ˜S(+)(ω)]on the eight principal harmonics of the sampling domainΩ (zz) 1 . ...

    work page 1920

  14. [14]

    D. A. Lidar and T. A. Brun, eds.,Quantum Error Correction(Cambridge University Press, 2013). 28 Re[Gzz ] Sequence s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ω/ω h Re[Gzx] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ω/ω h Im[Gzx] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ω/ω h +10−6 0 −10−6 FIG. 6. Heat maps of the filter function matricesG, composed ofN s-rows of optimised control sequence filter functions evaluated ...

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Khodjasteh and L

    K. Khodjasteh and L. Viola, Dynamically Error-Corrected Gates for Universal Quantum Computation, Physical Review Letters102, 080501 (2009)

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Dutta and P

    P. Dutta and P. M. Horn, Low-frequency fluctuations in solids: 1/f noise, Reviews of Modern Physics53, 497 (1981)

    work page 1981

  17. [17]

    Paladino, Y

    E. Paladino, Y . M. Galperin, G. Falci, and B. L. Altshuler, 1/f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information, Reviews of Modern Physics86, 361 (2014)

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    O. Dial, M. Shulman, S. Harvey, H. Bluhm, V . Umansky, and A. Yacoby, Charge Noise Spectroscopy Using Coherent Exchange Oscilla- tions in a Singlet-Triplet Qubit, Physical Review Letters110, 146804 (2013)

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    Yoshihara, Y

    F. Yoshihara, Y . Nakamura, F. Yan, S. Gustavsson, J. Bylander, W. D. Oliver, and J.-S. Tsai, Flux qubit noise spectroscopy using Rabi oscillations under strong driving conditions, Physical Review B89, 020503 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Faoro and L

    L. Faoro and L. Viola, Dynamical Suppression of $1/f$ Noise Processes in Qubit Systems, Physical Review Letters92, 117905 (2004)

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    Wudarski, Y

    F. Wudarski, Y . Zhang, A. N. Korotkov, A. Petukhov, and M. Dykman, Characterizing Low-Frequency Qubit Noise, Physical Review Applied19, 064066 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    L. Li, M. J. W. Hall, and H. M. Wiseman, Concepts of quantum non-markovianity: A hierarchy, Physics Reports759, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Addis, F

    C. Addis, F. Ciccarello, M. Cascio, G. M. Palma, and S. Maniscalco, Dynamical decoupling efficiency versus quantum non-Markovianity, New Journal of Physics17, 123004 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Viola, E

    L. Viola, E. Knill, and S. Lloyd, Dynamical decoupling of open quantum systems, Physical Review Letters82, 2417 (1999)

    work page 1999

  25. [25]

    G. S. Uhrig, Exact results on dynamical decoupling by pipulses in quantum information processes, New Journal of Physics10, 083024 (2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    G. S. Uhrig and S. Pasini, Efficient coherent control by sequences of pulses of finite duration, New Journal of Physics12, 045001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Khodjasteh, D

    K. Khodjasteh, D. A. Lidar, and L. Viola, Arbitrarily Accurate Dynamical Control in Open Quantum Systems, Physical Review Letters 104, 090501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Yang, Z.-Y

    W. Yang, Z.-Y . Wang, and R.-B. Liu, Preserving qubit coherence by dynamical decoupling, Frontiers of Physics6, 2 (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    A. Ajoy, G. A. Álvarez, and D. Suter, Optimal pulse spacing for dynamical decoupling in the presence of a purely dephasing spin bath, Physical Review A83, 032303 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    M. J. Biercuk, A. C. Doherty, and H. Uys, Dynamical decoupling sequence construction as a filter-design problem, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics44, 154002 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Cywi ´nski, R

    Ł. Cywi ´nski, R. M. Lutchyn, C. P. Nave, and S. D. Das Sarma, How to Enhance Dephasing Time in Superconducting Qubits, Physical Review B77, 174509 (2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    A. G. Kofman and G. Kurizki, Acceleration of quantum decay processes by frequent observations, Nature405, 546 (2000)

    work page 2000

  33. [33]

    T. J. Green, H. Uys, and M. J. Biercuk, High-order noise filtering in nontrivial quantum logic gates, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 020501 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    Soare, H

    A. Soare, H. Ball, D. Hayes, J. Sastrawan, M. C. Jarratt, J. J. McLoughlin, X. Zhen, T. J. Green, and M. J. Biercuk, Experimental noise filtering by quantum control, Nature Physics10, 825 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    G. A. Paz-Silva and L. Viola, General transfer-function approach to noise filtering in open-loop quantum control, Physical Review Letters 113, 250501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Pasini and G

    S. Pasini and G. S. Uhrig, Optimized dynamical decoupling for power-law noise spectra, Physical Review A81, 012309 (2010)

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    Ball and M

    H. Ball and M. J. Biercuk, Walsh-synthesized noise filters for quantum logic, EPJ Quantum Technology2, 11 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    G. A. Álvarez and D. Suter, Measuring the Spectrum of Colored Noise by Dynamical Decoupling, Physical Review Letters107, 230501 29 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Almog, Y

    I. Almog, Y . Sagi, G. Gordon, G. Bensky, G. Kurizki, and N. Davidson, Direct measurement of the system-environment coupling as a tool for understanding decoherence and dynamical decoupling, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics44, 154006 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    T. Yuge, S. Sasaki, and Y . Hirayama, Measurement of the noise spectrum using a multiple-pulse sequence., Physical Review Letters107, 170504 (2011)

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    Sza´nkowski and Ł

    P. Sza´nkowski and Ł. Cywi´nski, Accuracy of dynamical-decoupling-based spectroscopy of Gaussian noise, Physical Review A97, 032101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Shitara, Shuo Sun, and Andr’es Montoya-Castillo, Fourier transform noise spectroscopy, npj Quantum Information 10, 52 (2024)

    Arian Vezvaee, N. Shitara, Shuo Sun, and Andr’es Montoya-Castillo, Fourier transform noise spectroscopy, npj Quantum Information 10, 52 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Chalermpusitarak, B

    T. Chalermpusitarak, B. Tonekaboni, Y . Wang, L. Norris, L. Viola, and G. A. Paz-Silva, Frame-Based Filter-Function Formalism for Quantum Characterization and Control, PRX Quantum2, 030315 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Norris, G

    L. Norris, G. A. Paz-Silva, and L. Viola, Qubit Noise Spectroscopy for Non-Gaussian Dephasing Environments., Physical Review Letters 116, 150503 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    G. A. Paz-Silva, S.-W. Lee, T. J. Green, and L. Viola, Dynamical decoupling sequences for multi-qubit dephasing suppression and long-time quantum memory, New Journal of Physics18, 073020 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Krzywda, P

    J. Krzywda, P. Sza ´nkowski, and Ł. Cywi ´nski, The dynamical-decoupling-based spatiotemporal noise spectroscopy, New Journal of Physics21, 043034 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    W. Dong, G. A. Paz-Silva, and L. Viola, Resource-efficient digital characterization and control of classical non-Gaussian noise, Applied Physics Letters122, 244001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    G. A. Paz-Silva, L. Norris, F. Beaudoin, and L. Viola, Extending comb-based spectral estimation to multiaxis quantum noise, Physical Review A100, 042334 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    G. A. Paz-Silva, L. Norris, and L. Viola, Multiqubit Spectroscopy of Gaussian Quantum Noise, Physical Review A95, 022121 (2017)

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Huang, D

    K. Huang, D. Farfurnik, A. Seif, M. Hafezi, and Y .-K. Liu, Random pulse sequences for qubit noise spectroscopy, Physical Review Applied23, 054090 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Tonekaboni, A

    B. Tonekaboni, A. Chantasri, H. Song, Y . Liu, and H. M. Wiseman, Greedy versus map-based optimized adaptive algorithms for random- telegraph-noise mitigation by spectator qubits, Physical Review A107, 032401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Sunget al., Multi-level quantum noise spectroscopy, Nature Communications12, 967 (2021)

    Y . Sunget al., Multi-level quantum noise spectroscopy, Nature Communications12, 967 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Capiglioniet al., Analysis of the robustness and dynamics of spin-locking, Scientific Reports12, 21232 (2022)

    M. Capiglioniet al., Analysis of the robustness and dynamics of spin-locking, Scientific Reports12, 21232 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    M. Q. Khan, W. Dong, L. M. Norris, and L. Viola, Multiaxis quantum noise spectroscopy robust to errors in state preparation and measurement, Physical Review Applied22, 024074 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Shitara and A

    N. Shitara and A. Montoya-Castillo, Fast, accurate, and error-resilient variational quantum noise spectroscopy (2024), arXiv v4 revised 2025-07-08, arXiv:2411.17064 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    J. S. Rojas-Arias, P. Stano, Y .-H. Wu, L. C. Camenzind, S. Tarucha, and D. Loss, Noise cross-correlations from single-shot measurements (2025), arXiv:2509.22073 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    T. J. Green, J. Sastrawan, H. Uys, and M. J. Biercuk, Arbitrary quantum control of qubits in the presence of universal noise, New Journal of Physics15, 095004 (2013)

    work page 2013

  58. [58]

    Barnes, M

    E. Barnes, M. S. Rudner, F. Martins, F. K. Malinowski, C. M. Marcus, and F. Kuemmeth, Filter function formalism beyond pure dephasing and non-markovian noise in singlet-triplet qubits, Physical Review B93, 121407 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Y . Sung, F. Beaudoin, L. Norris, F. Yan, D. Kim, J. Y . Qiu, U. von Lüpke, J. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, L. Viola, and W. D. Oliver, Non-gaussian noise spectroscopy with a superconducting qubit sensor, Nature Communications10, 3715 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Bylander, S

    J. Bylander, S. Gustavsson, F. Yan, F. Yoshihara, K. Harrabi, G. Fitch, D. G. Cory, Y . Nakamura, J.-S. Tsai, and W. D. Oliver, Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit, Nature Physics7, 565 (2011)

    work page 2011

  61. [61]

    Willick, D

    K. Willick, D. K. Park, and J. Baugh, Efficient continuous-wave noise spectroscopy beyond weak coupling, Physical Review A98, 013414 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Hernández-Gómez, F

    S. Hernández-Gómez, F. Poggiali, P. Cappellaro, and N. Fabbri, Noise spectroscopy of a quantum-classical environment with a diamond qubit, Physical Review B98, 214307 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    Ramon, Trispectrum reconstruction of non-gaussian noise, Physical Review B100, 161302 (2019)

    G. Ramon, Trispectrum reconstruction of non-gaussian noise, Physical Review B100, 161302 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    Wang and A

    Y .-X. Wang and A. A. Clerk, Spectral characterization of non-gaussian quantum noise: Keldysh approach and application to photon shot noise, Physical Review Research2, 033196 (2020)

    work page 2020

  65. [65]

    L. V . Keldysh, Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes, Soviet Physics JETP20, 1018 (1965)

    work page 1965

  66. [66]

    Schwinger, Brownian Motion of a Quantum Oscillator, Journal of Mathematical Physics2, 407 (1961)

    J. Schwinger, Brownian Motion of a Quantum Oscillator, Journal of Mathematical Physics2, 407 (1961)

    work page 1961

  67. [67]

    Kubo, Generalized Cumulant Expansion Method, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan17, 1100 (1962)

    R. Kubo, Generalized Cumulant Expansion Method, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan17, 1100 (1962)

    work page 1962

  68. [68]

    Sza ´nkowski, G

    P. Sza ´nkowski, G. Ramon, J. Krzywda, D. Kwiatkowski, and Ł. Cywi ´nski, Environmental noise spectroscopy with qubits subjected to dynamical decoupling., Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29, 333001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    Kubo, Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes

    R. Kubo, Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes. I. General Theory and Simple Applications to Magnetic and Conduction Problems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan12, 570 (1957)

    work page 1957

  70. [70]

    E. C. Titchmarsh,Introduction to the Theory of Fourier Integrals, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1937)

    work page 1937

  71. [71]

    C. W. Skingle, K. H. Heron, and D. R. Gaukroger,The Application of the Hilbert Transform to System Response Analysis, Tech. Rep. ARC-CP-1378 (Aeronautical Research Council, London, UK, 1974) available via Aerade/Cranfield University

    work page 1974

  72. [72]

    Huang, Y

    Z. Huang, Y . Lu, A. Grassellino, A. Romanenko, J. Koch, and S. Zhu, Completely positive map for noisy driven quantum systems derived by keldysh expansion, Quantum7, 1158 (2023)

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Cywi ´nski, Dynamical-decoupling noise spectroscopy at an optimal working point of a qubit, Physical Review A90, 042307 (2014)

    Ł. Cywi ´nski, Dynamical-decoupling noise spectroscopy at an optimal working point of a qubit, Physical Review A90, 042307 (2014)

    work page 2014

  74. [74]

    Wang and G

    Y . Wang and G. A. Paz-Silva, Broadband spectroscopy of quantum noise, Physical Review A111, 052407 (2025). 30

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    Chandran and S

    V . Chandran and S. Elgar, A general procedure for the derivation of principal domains of higher-order spectra, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing42, 229 (1994)

    work page 1994

  76. [76]

    Romach, C

    Y . Romach, C. Müller, T. Unden, L. J. Rogers, T. Isoda, K. M. Itoh, M. Markham, A. Stacey, J. Meijer, S. Pezzagna, B. Naydenov, L. P. McGuinness, N. Bar-Gill, and F. Jelezko, Spectroscopy of surface-induced noise using shallow spins in diamond., Physical Review Letters114, 017601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  77. [77]

    Zhao, Mitigation of quantum crosstalk in cross-resonance-based qubit architectures, Physical Review Applied20, 054033 (2023)

    P. Zhao, Mitigation of quantum crosstalk in cross-resonance-based qubit architectures, Physical Review Applied20, 054033 (2023)

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    C. L. Nikias and A. P. Petropulu,Higher-Order Spectra Analysis: A Nonlinear Signal Processing Framework(Prentice Hall PTR, 1993)

    work page 1993

  79. [79]

    V . Frey, S. Mavadia, L. Norris, W. de Ferranti, D. Lucarelli, L. Viola, and M. J. Biercuk, Application of optimal band-limited control protocols to quantum noise sensing., Nature Communications8, 2189 (2017)

    work page 2017

  80. [80]

    Norris, D

    L. Norris, D. Lucarelli, V . Frey, S. Mavadia, M. J. Biercuk, and L. Viola, Optimally band-limited spectroscopy of control noise using a qubit sensor, Physical Review A98, 032315 (2018)

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.