pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07971 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🪐 quant-ph

Simultaneous ground-state cooling of six mechanical modes of two levitated nanoparticles

Qian Zhang , Yi Xu , Jie-Qiao Liao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords ground-state coolinglevitated nanoparticlesmechanical modescavity optomechanicspolarization angledark modescoherent scatteringoptical tweezers
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tuning the polarization angle allows simultaneous ground-state cooling of six mechanical modes in two levitated nanoparticles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents a system where two levitated nanoparticles, each trapped by an optical tweezer, are coupled to a single cavity mode with controllable polarization angle. By deriving the system Hamiltonian and linearizing it, the authors show that adjusting this angle controls the coupling channels between the cavity field and the particles' motions. This tuning avoids dark modes that would otherwise prevent effective cooling, enabling all six motional modes to reach the ground state through coherent scattering. A reader would care because reaching ground state for multiple massive objects simultaneously is a step toward observing quantum behavior at macroscopic scales with multiple particles.

Core claim

The paper establishes that in a cavity-levitated-nanoparticle system with two nanoparticles, the linearized seven-mode Hamiltonian exhibits a coupling structure where the polarization angle θ between the cavity and tweezer fields can be tuned to suppress dark modes and realize simultaneous ground-state cooling of the six mechanical displacement modes via coherent scattering.

What carries the argument

The polarization angle θ that controls the coupling channels in the linearized Hamiltonian to prevent dark mode formation.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the system can be accurately described by the linearized Hamiltonian without significant nonlinear effects or other heating mechanisms interfering with the cooling process.

What would settle it

Observing that at the predicted optimal polarization angle, at least one of the six modes remains above the ground state with significant phonon number would falsify the simultaneous cooling claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07971 by Jie-Qiao Liao, Qian Zhang, Yi Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ground-state cooling is a prerequisite for exploring macroscopic quantum effects in mechanical motion of massive objects. Here we construct a polarization-angle-controllable coupled cavity-levitated-nanoparticle system in which two nanoparticles trapped by individual tweezers are coupled to a single-mode field in a cavity. We also study the simultaneous ground-state cooling of six mechanical displacement modes of the two levitated nanoparticles through the coherent scattering mechanism. By deriving the Hamiltonian of the system and performing the linearization, we obtain a linearized seven-mode Hamiltonian, which can exhibit the coupling structure and cooling mechanism. We confirm the physical condition for the appearance of dark modes, which will suppress the simultaneous ground-state cooling of these mechanical modes. We also find that, by properly tuning the polarization angle $\theta $ between the cavity field and the optical tweezer fields, the coupling channels can be controlled on demand and simultaneous ground-state cooling of these six motional modes of the two nanoparticles can be realized. Our work paves the way for generation and manipulation of collective macroscopic quantum effects in multiple levitated nanoparticles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a polarization-tunable optomechanical system consisting of two levitated nanoparticles coupled to a single cavity mode via coherent scattering. The authors derive the full system Hamiltonian, perform linearization to obtain an effective seven-mode model, identify the conditions under which dark modes appear in the coupling matrix (suppressing cooling of certain mechanical modes), and show that adjusting the polarization angle θ between the cavity field and the tweezer fields modifies the coupling channels to give all six mechanical modes finite optomechanical coupling rates, thereby enabling simultaneous ground-state cooling.

Significance. If the derivation and tuning result hold, the work is significant for levitated optomechanics as it provides an experimentally accessible control knob (θ) to eliminate dark subspaces in multi-particle systems without requiring additional fields or cavities. This could facilitate collective quantum effects and multi-mode quantum control with massive objects. The explicit Hamiltonian derivation and identification of the dark-mode condition constitute a clear theoretical contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Linearized seven-mode Hamiltonian] Linearized seven-mode Hamiltonian section: the claim that tuning θ eliminates the dark subspace relies on the structure of the coupling matrix, but the manuscript does not provide the explicit eigenvalues or the null-space dimension as a function of θ to quantitatively confirm that all six modes acquire non-zero coupling rates for accessible θ values (e.g., between 0 and π/2).
  2. [Dark modes condition] Dark modes condition: while the physical condition for dark modes is stated to be confirmed, the manuscript should explicitly derive or tabulate the optomechanical coupling rates g_i(θ) for each of the six modes to demonstrate that a single θ simultaneously renders all rates finite and comparable, rather than leaving the avoidance of dark modes as a qualitative statement.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and main text refer to 'confirming the physical condition' for dark modes; the corresponding section should include a short summary sentence or equation reference so readers can locate the confirmation without searching the derivation.
  2. Notation for the six mechanical modes (e.g., x1, y1, z1 for each nanoparticle) should be introduced in a dedicated table or paragraph early in the Hamiltonian section to improve readability of the seven-mode model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the thorough review and the recommendation for minor revision. The comments highlight areas where additional quantitative details can improve the clarity of our results. We have prepared revisions to address both major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Linearized seven-mode Hamiltonian] Linearized seven-mode Hamiltonian section: the claim that tuning θ eliminates the dark subspace relies on the structure of the coupling matrix, but the manuscript does not provide the explicit eigenvalues or the null-space dimension as a function of θ to quantitatively confirm that all six modes acquire non-zero coupling rates for accessible θ values (e.g., between 0 and π/2).

    Authors: We agree with this observation. Although the structure of the coupling matrix is analyzed in the manuscript, we did not include the explicit θ-dependence of the eigenvalues or the dimension of the kernel. In the revised manuscript, we will add a subsection or appendix deriving the eigenvalues of the relevant coupling matrix and plotting or tabulating the null-space dimension versus θ. This will confirm that for θ ∈ (0, π/2) excluding isolated points, the null space is trivial, ensuring all six mechanical modes have finite optomechanical couplings. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Dark modes condition] Dark modes condition: while the physical condition for dark modes is stated to be confirmed, the manuscript should explicitly derive or tabulate the optomechanical coupling rates g_i(θ) for each of the six modes to demonstrate that a single θ simultaneously renders all rates finite and comparable, rather than leaving the avoidance of dark modes as a qualitative statement.

    Authors: We appreciate this constructive suggestion. The manuscript identifies the condition for dark modes but presents the avoidance via tuning θ qualitatively. To address this, we will explicitly derive the expressions for the six optomechanical coupling rates g_i(θ) in the revised version and include a table showing their values at representative angles, such as θ = π/4, where all rates are non-zero and comparable in magnitude. This will demonstrate that a single polarization angle enables simultaneous ground-state cooling of all modes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper derives the system Hamiltonian from the physical setup of two levitated nanoparticles coupled to a cavity mode via coherent scattering, performs standard linearization around steady-state amplitudes, obtains the seven-mode coupling matrix, identifies the dark-mode condition from the eigenvalues of that matrix, and shows that the polarization angle θ enters the coupling rates such that the dark subspace can be eliminated. All steps follow from the explicit equations without any fitted parameters renamed as predictions, without load-bearing self-citations, and without ansätze smuggled in from prior work. The simultaneous-cooling claim is a direct consequence of the derived θ-dependent couplings under the stated approximations, making the derivation self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on the standard assumptions of quantum optics for levitated systems and the ability to tune θ without additional complications.

free parameters (1)
  • polarization angle θ
    Tuned to achieve the desired coupling structure, but not fitted to data; chosen to control channels.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linearization of the Hamiltonian is valid for the cooling analysis.
    Common in cavity optomechanics to approximate around mean fields.
  • domain assumption The coherent scattering provides the dominant cooling mechanism.
    Assumed for the system to achieve ground state cooling.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1258 out tokens · 68829 ms · 2026-05-10T17:41:34.937825+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    + 1 2 kµ ( ˆµ1 − ˆµ2)2] + ∑ j=1,2 1 2 kxy ˆx j(ˆy j − ˆy ¯j). (A.12) Here, the displacement magnitudes are given by Rα = αη ftw ϵ(1) tw ϵ(2) tw [D−1 cos(ktwD) cos3 θ + ktw sin(ktwD) cos3 θ − 2D−1 cos θ sin2 θ cos(ktwD)]/ℏ, (A.13a) Rβ = αη ftw ϵ(1) tw ϵ(2) tw [D−1 cos(ktwD)(2 sin3 θ − 2 sin θ) + ktw sin(kD) cos2 θ sin θ + D−1 cos2 θ sin θ cos(ktwD)]/ℏ, (A....

    work page

  2. [2]

    Ashkin, Acceleration and Trapping of Particles by Radiation Pressure, Phys

    A. Ashkin, Acceleration and Trapping of Particles by Radiation Pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 156 (1970)

    work page 1970

  3. [3]

    Ashkin, J

    A. Ashkin, J. M. Dziedzic, J. E. Bjorkholm, and S. Chu, Obser- vation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles, Opt. Lett. 11, 288 (1986)

    work page 1986

  4. [4]

    Ashkin, Optical Trapping and Manipulation of Neutral Par- ticles Using Lasers (World Scientific, Singapore, 2006)

    A. Ashkin, Optical Trapping and Manipulation of Neutral Par- ticles Using Lasers (World Scientific, Singapore, 2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Millen, T

    J. Millen, T. S. Monteiro, R. Pettit, and A. N. V amivakas, Optomechanics with levitated particles, Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 026401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, M

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, M. Aspelmeyer, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, and O. Romero-Isart, Levitodynamics: Levitation and control of microscopic objects in vacuum, Science 374, eabg3027 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Winstone, A

    G. Winstone, A. Grinin, M. Bhattacharya, A. A. Geraci, T. Li, P . J. Pauzauskie, and N. V amivakas, Optomechanics of optically-levitated particles: A tutorial and perspective, arXiv: 2307.11858

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Rademacher, A

    M. Rademacher, A. Pontin, J. M. H. Gosling, P . F. Barker, and M. Toroš, Roto-translational levitated optomechanics, arXiv:2507.20905

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    Ashkin, Optical trapping and manipulation of neutral parti- cles using lasers, Proc

    A. Ashkin, Optical trapping and manipulation of neutral parti- cles using lasers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 4853 (1997)

    work page 1997

  10. [10]

    D. E. Chang, J. D. Thompson, H. Park, V . Vuleti´c, A. S. Zibrov, P . Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, Trapping and Manipulation of Iso- lated Atoms Using Nanoscale Plasmonic Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 123004 (2009)

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    Dholakia and P

    K. Dholakia and P . Zemánek, Colloquium: Gripped by light: Optical binding, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1767 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Ashkin, J

    A. Ashkin, J. Dziedzic, and T. Y amane, Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams, Nature (London) 330, 769 (1987)

    work page 1987

  13. [13]

    Ashkin, K

    A. Ashkin, K. Schütze, J. M. Dziedzic, U. Euteneuer, and M. Schliwa, Force generation of organelle transport measured in vivo by an infrared laser trap, Nature (London) 348, 346 (1990)

    work page 1990

  14. [14]

    F. M. Fazal and S. M. Block, Optical tweezers study life under tension, Nat. Photonics 5, 318 (2011)

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Roda-Llordes, A

    M. Roda-Llordes, A. Riera-Campeny, D. Candoli, P . T. Gro- chowski, and O. Romero-Isart, Macroscopic Quantum Super- positions via Dynamics in a Wide Double-Well Potential, Phys. 14 Rev. Lett. 132, 023601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Bemani, A

    F. Bemani, A. A. Rakhubovsky, and R. Filip, Heralded quan- tum non-Gaussian states in pulsed levitating optomechanics, npj Quantum Inf. 11, 160 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Kamba, N

    M. Kamba, N. Hara, and K. Aikawa, Quantum squeezing of a levitated nanomechanical oscillator, Science 389, 1225 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Rossi, A

    M. Rossi, A. Militaru, N. Carlon Zambon, A. Riera-Campeny, O. Romero-Isart, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, Quantum De- localization of a Levitated Nanoparticle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 083601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    D. E. Chang, C. A. Regal, S. B. Papp, D. J. Wilson, J. Y e, O. Painter, H. J. Kimble, and P . Zoller, Cavity opto-mechanics using an optically levitated nanosphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 1005 (2010)

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    P . F. Barker and M. N. Shneider, Cavity cooling of an optically trapped nanoparticle, Phys. Rev. A 81, 023826 (2010)

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    Romero-Isart, M

    O. Romero-Isart, M. L. Juan, R. Quidant, and J. I. Cirac, To- ward quantum superposition of living organisms, New J. Phys. 12, 033015 (2010)

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    de los Ríos Sommer, N

    A. de los Ríos Sommer, N. Meyer, and R. Quidant, Strong op- tomechanical coupling at room temperature by coherent scat- tering, Nat. Commun. 12, 276 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    K. Dare, J. J. Hansen, I. Coroli, A. Johnson, M. Aspelmeyer, and U. Deli ´c, Ultrastrong linear optomechanical interaction, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L042025 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    S. K. Alavi, Z. Sheng, H. Lee, H. Lee, and S. Hong, Enhanced Optomechanical Coupling between an Optically Levitated Par- ticle and an Ultrahigh-Q Optical Microcavity, ACS Photonics 12, 34 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Rudolph, K

    H. Rudolph, K. Hornberger, and B. A. Stickler, Entangling lev- itated nanoparticles by coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. A 101, 011804(R) (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    A. K. Chauhan, O. ˇCernotík, and R. Filip, Stationary Gaussian entanglement between levitated nanoparticles, New J. Phys. 22, 123021 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Brandão, D

    I. Brandão, D. Tandeitnik, and T. Guerreiro, Coher- ent scattering-mediated correlations between levitated nanospheres, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 045013 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Ranjit, M

    G. Ranjit, M. Cunningham, K. Casey, and A. A. Geraci, Zep- tonewton force sensing with nanospheres in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 93, 053801 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Monteiro, S

    F. Monteiro, S. Ghosh, A. G. Fine, and D. C. Moore, Optical levitation of 10-ng spheres with nano-g acceleration sensitivity, Phys. Rev. A 96, 063841 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    J. Ahn, Z. Xu, J. Bang, P . Ju, X. Gao, and T. Li, Ultrasensi tive torque detection with an optically levitated nanorotor, Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 89 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Zheng, L.-M

    Y . Zheng, L.-M. Zhou, Y . Dong, C.-W. Qiu, X.-D. Chen, G.-C. Guo, and F.-W. Sun, Robust Optical-Levitation-Based Metrol- ogy of Nanoparticles Position and Mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 223603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Monteiro, W

    F. Monteiro, W. Li, G. Afek, C. Li, and D. C. Moore, Force and acceleration sensing with optically levitated nanogram masses at microkelvin temperatures, Phys. Rev. A 101, 053835 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    T. F. Kuang, R. Huang, W. Xiong, Y . L. Zuo, X. Han, F. Nori, C.-W. Qiu, H. Luo, H. Jing, and G. Z. Xiao, Nonlinear multi- frequency phonon lasers with active levitated optomechanics, Nat. Phys. 19, 414 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Liang, S

    T. Liang, S. Zhu, P . He, Z. Chen, Y . Wang, C. Li, Z. Fu, X. Gao, X. Chen, N. Li, Q. Zhu, and H. Hu, Y octonewton force detection based on optically levitated oscillator, Fundam. Res. 3, 57 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Zheng, L.-H

    Y . Zheng, L.-H. Liu, X.-D. Chen, G.-C. Guo, and F.-W. Sun, Arbitrary nonequilibrium steady-state construction with a levi- tated nanoparticle, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Zhang, X

    H. Zhang, X. Chen, and Z.-q. Yin, Quantum information pro- cessing and precision measurement using a levitated nanodia- mond, Adv. Quantum Technol. 4, 2000154 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Reiter, A

    F. Reiter, A. S. Sørensen, P . Zoller, and C. A. Muschik, Dis- sipative quantum error correction and application to quantum sensing with trapped ions, Nat. Commun. 8, 1822 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Wilson-Rae, N

    I. Wilson-Rae, N. Nooshi, W. Zwerger, and T. J. Kippenberg, Theory of Ground State Cooling of a Mechanical Oscillator Us- ing Dynamical Backaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 093901 (2007)

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    Marquardt, J

    F. Marquardt, J. P . Chen, A. A. Clerk, and S. M. Girvin, Quan- tum Theory of Cavity-Assisted Sideband Cooling of Mechani- cal Motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 093902 (2007)

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    J. D. Teufel, T. Donner, D. Li, J. W. Harlow, M. S. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, K. W. Lehnert, and R. W. Simmonds, Sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state, Nature (London) 475, 359 (2011)

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    J. Chan, T. P . M. Alegre, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. T. Hill, A. Krause, S. Gröblacher, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Painter, Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state, Nature (London) 478, 89 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    Sommer and C

    C. Sommer and C. Genes, Partial Optomechanical Refrigera- tion via Multimode Cold-Damping Feedback, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 203605 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Magrini, P

    L. Magrini, P . Rosenzweig, C. Bach, A. Deutschmann-Olek, S. G. Hofer, S. Hong, N. Kiesel, A. Kugi, and M. Aspelmeyer, Real-time optimal quantum control of mechanical motion at room temperature, Nature (London) 595, 373 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Tebbenjohanns, M

    F. Tebbenjohanns, M. L. Mattana, M. Rossi, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levi- tated in cryogenic free space, Nature (London) 595, 378 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Liu, X.-L

    Y .-H. Liu, X.-L. Yin, J.-F. Huang, and J.-Q. Liao, Accelerated ground-state cooling of an optomechanical resonator via short- cuts to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. A 105, 023504 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Deli ´c, M

    U. Deli ´c, M. Reisenbauer, D. Grass, N. Kiesel, V . Vuleti ´c, and M. Aspelmeyer, Cavity Cooling of a Levitated Nanosphere by Coherent Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 123602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, P

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, P . Maurer, D. Windey, L. Novotny, R. Reimann, and O. Romero-Isart, Theory for cavity cooling of levitated nanoparticles via coherent scattering: Master equation approach, Phys. Rev. A 100, 013805 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Xu, Y .-H

    Y . Xu, Y .-H. Liu, C. Liu, and J.-Q. Liao, Simultaneous ground- state cooling of two levitated nanoparticles by coherent scatter- ing, Phys. Rev. A 109, 053521 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Deli ´c, M

    U. Deli ´c, M. Reisenbauer, K. Dare, D. Grass, V . Vuleti ´c, N. Kiesel, and M. Aspelmeyer, Cooling of a levitated nano-particle to the motional quantum ground state, Science 367, 892 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Piotrowski, D

    J. Piotrowski, D. Windey, J. Vijayan, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, A. de los Ríos Sommer, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, O. Romero- Isart, R. Reimann, and L. Novotny, Simultaneous ground-state cooling of two mechanical modes of a levitated nanoparticle, Nat. Phys. 19, 1009 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Windey, C

    D. Windey, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, P . Maurer, L. Novotny, O. Romero-Isart, and R. Reimann, Cavity-Based 3D Cooling of a Levitated Nanoparticle via Coherent Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 123601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    Dania, O

    L. Dania, O. S. Kremer, J. Piotrowski, D. Candoli, J. Vijayan, O. Romero-Isart, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, L. Novotny, and M. Frimmer, High-purity quantum optomechanics at room temper- ature, Nat. Phys. 21, 1603 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Deplano, A

    Q. Deplano, A. Pontin, A. Ranfagni, F. Marino, and F. Marin, High purity two-dimensional levitated mechanical oscillator, Nat. Commun. 16, 4215 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    J. Ahn, Z. Xu, J. Bang, Y .-H. Deng, T. M. Hoang, Q. Han, R.- 15 M. Ma, and T. Li, Optically Levitated Nanodumbbell Torsion Balance and GHz Nanomechanical Rotor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 033603 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Liu, Z.-q

    S. Liu, Z.-q. Yin, and T. Li, Prethermalization and nonrecipro- cal phonon transport in a levitated optomechanical array, Adv. Quantum Technol. 3, 1900099 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    J. Y an, X. Y u, Z. V . Han, T. Li, and J. Zhang, On-demand assembly of optically-levitated nanoparticle arrays in vacuum, Photon. Res. 11, 600 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    M. Wu, N. Li, H. Cai, C. Liu, and H. Hu, Direct and mediated dipole-dipole interactions in a reconfigurable array of optical traps, Opt. Lett. 51, 1367 (2026)

    work page 2026

  58. [58]

    Rudolph, U

    H. Rudolph, U. Deli ´c, M. Aspelmeyer, K. Hornberger, and B. A. Stickler, Force-Gradient Sensing and Entanglement via Feedback Cooling of Interacting Nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 193602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Y . Li, C. Li, J. Zhang, Y . Dong, and H. Hu, Collective-Motion- Enhanced Acceleration Sensing via an Optically Levitated Mi- crosphere Array, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 024018 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Rieser, M

    J. Rieser, M. A. Ciampini, H. Rudolph, N. Kiesel, K. Horn- berger, B. A. Stickler, M. Aspelmeyer, and U. Deli ´c, Tunable light-induced dipole-dipole interaction between optically levi- tated nanoparticles, Science 377, 987 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Vijayan, J

    J. Vijayan, J. Piotrowski, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, K. Weber, O. Romero-Isart, and L. Novotny, Cavity-mediated long-range interactions in levitated optomechanics, Nat. Phys. 20, 859 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Liška, T

    V . Liška, T. Zemánková, P . Jákl, M. Šiler, S. H. Simpson, P . Zemánek, and O. Brzobohatý, PT-like phase transition and limit cycle oscillations in non-reciprocally coupled optomechanical oscillators levitated in vacuum, Nat. Phys. 20, 1622 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Reisenbauer, H

    M. Reisenbauer, H. Rudolph, L. Egyed, K. Hornberger, A. V . Zasedatelev, M. Abuzarli, B. A. Stickler, and U. Deli ´c, Non- Hermitian dynamics and nonreciprocity of optically coupled nanoparticles, Nat. Phys. 20, 1629 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Novotny and B

    L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-optics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, Eangland, 2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [65]

    C. W. Gardiner and P . Zoller,Quantum Noise (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    work page 2000

  66. [66]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic, New Y ork, 2014)

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    Vitali, S

    D. Vitali, S. Gigan, A. Ferreira, H. R. Bohm, P . Tombesi, A. Guerreiro, V . V edral, A. Zeilinger, and M. Aspelmeyer, Op- tomechanical Entanglement between a Movable Mirror and a Cavity Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 030405 (2007)

    work page 2007

  68. [68]

    Genes, D

    C. Genes, D. Vitali, and P . Tombesi, Simultaneous cooling and entanglement of mechanical modes of a micromirror in an op- tical cavity, New J. Phys. 10, 095009 (2008)

    work page 2008

  69. [69]

    C. Dong, V . Fiore, M. C. Kuzyk, and H. Wang, Optomechanical dark mode, Science 338, 1609 (2012)

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    Wang and A

    Y .-D. Wang and A. A. Clerk, Using Interference for High Fi- delity Quantum State Transfer in Optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 153603 (2012)

    work page 2012

  71. [71]

    Tian, Adiabatic State Conversion and Pulse Transmission in Optomechanical Systems, Phys

    L. Tian, Adiabatic State Conversion and Pulse Transmission in Optomechanical Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 153604 (2012)

    work page 2012

  72. [72]

    Lai, J.-F

    D.-G. Lai, J.-F. Huang, X.-L. Yin, B.-P . Hou, W. Li, D. Vitali, F. Nori, and J.-Q. Liao, Nonreciprocal ground-state cooling of multiple mechanical resonators, Phys. Rev. A 102, 011502(R) (2020)

    work page 2020

  73. [73]

    D.-G. Lai, X. Wang, W. Qin, B.-P . Hou, F. Nori, and J.-Q. Liao, Tunable optomechanically induced transparency by controlling the dark-mode effect, Phys. Rev. A 102, 023707 (2020)

    work page 2020

  74. [74]

    Lai, J.-Q

    D.-G. Lai, J.-Q. Liao, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Noise- Tolerant Optomechanical Entanglement via Synthetic Mag- netism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 063602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  75. [75]

    Huang, D.-G

    J. Huang, D.-G. Lai, C. Liu, J.-F. Huang, F. Nori, and J.-Q. Liao, Multimode optomechanical cooling via general dark-mode con- trol, Phys. Rev. A 106, 013526 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    Huang, D.-G

    J. Huang, D.-G. Lai, and J.-Q. Liao, Controllable generation of mechanical quadrature squeezing via dark-mode engineering in cavity optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 108, 013516 (2023)

    work page 2023

  77. [77]

    Huang, C

    J. Huang, C. Liu, X.-W. Xu, and J.-Q. Liao, Dark-Mode Theo- rems for Quantum Networks, arXiv:2312.06274

    work page arXiv

  78. [78]

    Pontin, Q

    A. Pontin, Q. Deplano, A. Ranfagni, F. Marino, and F. Marin, Strong Coupling and Dark Modes in the Motion of a Pair of Levitated Nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 073602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    Arita, E

    Y . Arita, E. M. Wright, and K. Dholakia, Optical binding of two cooled micro-gyroscopes levitated in vacuum, Optica 5, 910 (2018)

    work page 2018

  80. [80]

    V . Jain, J. Gieseler, C. Moritz, C. Dellago, R. Quidant, and L. Novotny, Direct Measurement of Photon Recoil from a Levi- tated Nanoparticle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 243601 (2016)

    work page 2016