pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08330 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.IT· math.IT

Group-invariant moments under tomographic projections

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.ITmath.IT
keywords tomographic projectionsgroup-invariant momentsHaar measurerotation invariancecryo-EMmoment recoveryidentifiabilitysignal reconstruction
0
0 comments X

The pith

The d-th moments of random tomographic projections determine the full d-th order rotation-invariant moments of the original object whenever d is at most the projection dimension.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that moments computed from projected, randomly rotated copies of an unknown function recover the corresponding group-averaged moments of the function itself. This holds for any original dimension as long as the moment order stays at or below the dimension of the projection subspace. A sympathetic reader would care because the result lets existing identifiability theorems that rely on moments in the full space transfer immediately to the tomographic case, including the classical covariance result for 3D objects from 2D cryo-EM images. The authors supply an explicit algorithm that performs the recovery.

Core claim

Whenever d ≤ m, the d-th order moment of the projected data Y = P(R · f), where R is Haar-uniform in SO(n) and P projects onto an m-dimensional subspace, determines the full d-th order Haar-orbit moment of f independently of the ambient dimension n. An explicit algorithmic procedure recovers the latter from the former. As a consequence, any identifiability result for the unprojected model based on d-th order group-invariant moment extends directly to the tomographic setting at the same moment order. In particular, for n=3, m=2, and d=2, the covariance of the 2D projection images determines the second-order rotationally invariant moment of the underlying 3D object.

What carries the argument

The d-th order Haar-orbit moment of f, recovered from the d-th order moment of the random projections Y via an explicit invertible mapping that holds for all d ≤ m.

If this is right

  • Any identifiability result based on d-th order group-invariant moments in the unprojected model carries over unchanged to the tomographic setting.
  • For n=3, m=2 and d=2 the covariance of 2D projections determines the second-order rotationally invariant moment of a 3D object.
  • An explicit algorithm computes the Haar-orbit moments directly from the observed projected moments.
  • The determination is independent of the original ambient dimension n.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result suggests that moment-based reconstruction methods in imaging can operate at lower orders than the ambient dimension would suggest.
  • Similar moment-preservation properties may hold for other linear operators or group actions beyond orthogonal projections.
  • Combining the recovery procedure with existing moment-inversion algorithms could reduce sample complexity for 3D reconstruction tasks.

Load-bearing premise

The rotations must be distributed uniformly according to the Haar measure on the rotation group, and the moment order d must not exceed the projection dimension m.

What would settle it

A pair of distinct functions f and g such that the d-th moments of their random projections agree for some d ≤ m, yet their Haar-orbit moments differ.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08330 by Amnon Balanov, Dan Edidin, Tamir Bendory.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the moment-lifting mechanism. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Let $f:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$ be an unknown object, and suppose the observations are tomographic projections of randomly rotated copies of $f$ of the form $Y = P(R\cdot f)$, where $R$ is Haar-uniform in $\mathrm{SO}(n)$ and $P$ is the projection onto an $m$-dimensional subspace, so that $Y:\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R}$. We prove that, whenever $d\le m$, the $d$-th order moment of the projected data determines the full $d$-th order Haar-orbit moment of $f$, independently of the ambient dimension $n$. We further provide an explicit algorithmic procedure for recovering the latter from the former. As a consequence, any identifiability result for the unprojected model based on $d$-th order group-invariant moment extends directly to the tomographic setting at the same moment order. In particular, for $n=3$, $m=2$, and $d=2$, our result recovers a classical result in the cryo-EM literature: the covariance of the 2D projection images determines the second order rotationally invariant moment of the underlying 3D object.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proves that for an unknown function f: R^n → R, the d-th order moments of its m-dimensional tomographic projections Y = P(R · f), where R is Haar-uniform in SO(n), determine the d-th order Haar-orbit moments of f whenever d ≤ m, independently of the ambient dimension n. It provides an explicit algorithmic procedure to recover the latter from the former. As a consequence, identifiability results based on d-th order group-invariant moments for the unprojected model extend directly to the tomographic setting. The result recovers the classical cryo-EM fact that the covariance of 2D projections determines the second-order rotationally invariant moment of the 3D object when n=3, m=2, d=2.

Significance. If the central determination result holds, the work is significant for cryo-EM and related tomographic reconstruction problems. It shows that projection does not increase the moment order needed for recovering rotationally invariant information, with an explicit recovery algorithm that is independent of n. This directly strengthens moment-based identifiability arguments in the literature and provides a concrete computational bridge between projected data and group-invariant tensors.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§2] §2 (or the section defining the moment maps): clarify whether the d-th order moments are taken with respect to the standard Lebesgue measure on the projected domain or with respect to the induced measure from the projection; this affects the explicit form of the recovery map.
  2. [Algorithm section] Algorithm 1 (or the algorithmic procedure section): the description of the recovery step should include a brief complexity analysis or reference to the linear algebra operations involved, since the procedure is claimed to be explicit and practical.
  3. [Introduction] Introduction, paragraph on cryo-EM: the citation to the classical result should be paired with a one-sentence statement of how the new theorem specializes exactly to that case (e.g., via the identification of the second-moment tensor).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary of our manuscript, the recognition of its significance for cryo-EM and related tomographic problems, and the recommendation for minor revision. The referee's description accurately captures the central result on the determination of d-th order Haar-invariant moments from m-dimensional projections when d ≤ m.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; direct injectivity proof on moment maps

full rationale

The paper establishes a mathematical determination result: for d ≤ m the d-th moment of Y = P(R·f) recovers the d-th Haar-orbit moment of f via an explicit algorithm, shown by proving injectivity of the moment map on the space of group-invariant tensors. This follows from linear algebra and dimension counting in the target space of P, without any fitted parameters, self-definitional reductions, or load-bearing self-citations. The consequence for identifiability results is a straightforward extension, not a circular renaming or ansatz. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce any claimed prediction to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract; the result rests on standard group-action and projection assumptions with no new free parameters or invented entities visible.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Rotations R are distributed according to the Haar measure on SO(n)
    Explicitly stated in the observation model Y = P(R·f).
  • domain assumption P is the orthogonal projection onto an m-dimensional subspace
    Part of the tomographic observation definition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5509 in / 1436 out tokens · 68720 ms · 2026-05-10T17:27:10.315368+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Structural variability from noisy tomographic projec- tions.SIAM journal on imaging sciences, 11(2):1441–1492, 2018

    Joakim And´ en and Amit Singer. Structural variability from noisy tomographic projec- tions.SIAM journal on imaging sciences, 11(2):1441–1492, 2018. 10

  2. [2]

    Non-uniformity of projection distributions attenuates resolution in cryo-em.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 150:160– 183, 2020

    Philip R Baldwin and Dmitry Lyumkis. Non-uniformity of projection distributions attenuates resolution in cryo-em.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 150:160– 183, 2020

  3. [3]

    Estimation under group actions: recovering orbits from invari- ants.Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 66:236–319, 2023

    Afonso S Bandeira, Ben Blum-Smith, Joe Kileel, Jonathan Niles-Weed, Amelia Perry, and Alexander S Wein. Estimation under group actions: recovering orbits from invari- ants.Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 66:236–319, 2023

  4. [4]

    Single-particle cryo-electron microscopy: Mathematical theory, computational challenges, and opportunities.IEEE signal processing magazine, 37(2):58–76, 2020

    Tamir Bendory, Alberto Bartesaghi, and Amit Singer. Single-particle cryo-electron microscopy: Mathematical theory, computational challenges, and opportunities.IEEE signal processing magazine, 37(2):58–76, 2020

  5. [5]

    Bispectrum inversion with application to multireference alignment.IEEE Transactions on signal processing, 66(4):1037–1050, 2017

    Tamir Bendory, Nicolas Boumal, Chao Ma, Zhizhen Zhao, and Amit Singer. Bispectrum inversion with application to multireference alignment.IEEE Transactions on signal processing, 66(4):1037–1050, 2017

  6. [6]

    The sample complexity of sparse multireference align- ment and single-particle cryo-electron microscopy.SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science, 6(2):254–282, 2024

    Tamir Bendory and Dan Edidin. The sample complexity of sparse multireference align- ment and single-particle cryo-electron microscopy.SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science, 6(2):254–282, 2024

  7. [7]

    Prov- able orbit recovery over SO(3) from the non-uniform second moment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20590, 2026

    Tamir Bendory, Dan Edidin, Josh Katz, Shay Kreymer, and Nir Sharon. Prov- able orbit recovery over SO(3) from the non-uniform second moment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20590, 2026

  8. [8]

    Orthogonal matrix retrieval in cryo- electron microscopy

    Tejal Bhamre, Teng Zhang, and Amit Singer. Orthogonal matrix retrieval in cryo- electron microscopy. In2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imag- ing (ISBI), pages 1048–1052. IEEE, 2015

  9. [9]

    Maximum like- lihood for high-noise group orbit estimation and single-particle cryo-EM.Annals of statistics, 52(1):52, 2024

    Zhou Fan, Roy R Lederman, Yi Sun, Tianhao Wang, and Sheng Xu. Maximum like- lihood for high-noise group orbit estimation and single-particle cryo-EM.Annals of statistics, 52(1):52, 2024

  10. [10]

    Cryo-EM heterogeneity analysis using regularized covariance estimation and kernel regression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(9):e2419140122, 2025

    Marc Aurele Gilles and Amit Singer. Cryo-EM heterogeneity analysis using regularized covariance estimation and kernel regression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(9):e2419140122, 2025

  11. [11]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2009

    Gabor T Herman.Fundamentals of computerized tomography: image reconstruction from projections. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009

  12. [12]

    The reconstruction of structure from electron micrographs of randomly ori- ented particles.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 82(1):15–39, 1980

    Zvi Kam. The reconstruction of structure from electron micrographs of randomly ori- ented particles.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 82(1):15–39, 1980

  13. [13]

    3D ab initio modeling in cryo-EM by autocorrelation analysis

    Eitan Levin, Tamir Bendory, Nicolas Boumal, Joe Kileel, and Amit Singer. 3D ab initio modeling in cryo-EM by autocorrelation analysis. In2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), pages 1569–1573. IEEE, 2018

  14. [14]

    SIAM, 2001

    Frank Natterer.The mathematics of computerized tomography. SIAM, 2001. 11

  15. [15]

    Measuring the effects of particle ori- entation to improve the efficiency of electron cryomicroscopy.Nature communications, 8(1):629, 2017

    Katerina Naydenova and Christopher J Russo. Measuring the effects of particle ori- entation to improve the efficiency of electron cryomicroscopy.Nature communications, 8(1):629, 2017

  16. [16]

    Computational methods for single-particle electron cryomicroscopy.Annual review of biomedical data science, 3:163–190, 2020

    Amit Singer and Fred J Sigworth. Computational methods for single-particle electron cryomicroscopy.Annual review of biomedical data science, 3:163–190, 2020. 12