pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09149 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · ✦ hep-ph

Classical and spin polarizabilities of singly heavy baryons within heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory

Zi-Jun Li , Zhan-Wei Liu , Ping Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords polarizabilitiesheavy baryonschiral perturbation theorycharmed baryonsbottom baryonselectromagnetic propertiesspin polarizabilities
0
0 comments X

The pith

Calculations at order p^4 in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory show small corrections to electric polarizabilities of singly charmed baryons but larger magnetic corrections related to transition moments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors perform a systematic calculation of the electromagnetic and spin polarizabilities for spin-1/2 singly charmed and bottom baryons using heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory up to order p^4. They find that higher-order corrections to the electric polarizability are small, whereas corrections to the magnetic polarizability are larger owing to the small mass splitting and are connected to transition magnetic moments. The spin polarizabilities for these baryons, with the exception of gamma_M1M1, are much smaller than those for nucleons. For singly bottom baryons the polarizabilities are generally larger than for charmed ones. This work provides concrete predictions within an effective field theory framework for properties of heavy baryons that can be tested experimentally.

Core claim

Within heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory at O(p^4) the electric polarizabilities of singly charmed baryons receive small higher-order corrections while the magnetic polarizabilities receive relatively larger corrections that arise from the small mass splitting of these states and are closely related to transition magnetic moments; the spin polarizabilities except for gamma_M1M1 are much smaller than the nucleons' and the values for singly bottom baryons are generally larger.

What carries the argument

The O(p^4) heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory expansion for the polarizabilities of heavy baryons, incorporating one-loop diagrams and local counterterms whose constants are determined from other observables.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the series in the chiral expansion converges well enough by order p^4 that omitted higher terms do not dominate and that the low-energy constants can be fixed without large errors from the small mass splittings.

What would settle it

An experimental determination of the magnetic polarizability of the Lambda_c baryon or its spin polarizabilities that shows large deviations from the computed O(p^4) values including the transition contributions would indicate the breakdown of the approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09149 by Ping Chen, Zhan-Wei Liu, Zi-Jun Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The contact term and loop diagrams at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a systematic study of the electromagnetic and spin polarizabilities of spin-1/2 singly charmed baryons at $\mathcal{O}(p^4)$ within the framework of heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory. Our results show that the higher-order corrections to the electric polarizability are small, while those to the magnetic polarizability are relatively larger due to the small mass splitting of singly charmed baryons and are closely related to transition magnetic moments. Furthermore, we find that the spin polarizabilities of singly charmed baryons, except for $\gamma_{M1M1}$, are much smaller than those of the nucleons. We have also calculated the polarizabilities for singly bottom baryons, with the results showing generally larger values than those of singly charmed baryons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the electric, magnetic, and spin polarizabilities of spin-1/2 singly charmed and bottom baryons at O(p^4) in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory. It reports that O(p^4) corrections to electric polarizabilities remain small, while those to magnetic polarizabilities are larger because of the small mass splittings in the charmed sector and are directly tied to transition magnetic moments. Spin polarizabilities (except γ_M1M1) are found to be substantially smaller than the corresponding nucleon values, with bottom-baryon results generally larger than charmed ones.

Significance. If the chiral expansion converges as assumed, the work supplies concrete predictions for heavy-baryon electromagnetic structure that can be confronted with future photoproduction or lattice data. The explicit linkage between magnetic polarizabilities and transition moments, together with the contrast between charmed and bottom sectors driven by mass splittings, is a useful phenomenological insight. The systematic O(p^4) treatment itself is a technical strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4] §4 (numerical results) and the discussion following Eq. (XX): the assertion that electric-polarizability corrections are 'small' while magnetic ones are 'relatively larger' rests on the numerical outputs, yet no explicit estimate of O(p^5) contributions or variation of the O(p^4) LECs within their natural ranges is provided. With Δ(Σ_c–Λ_c) ≈ 170 MeV comparable to m_π, the power-counting suppression of higher orders is not obviously guaranteed; a robustness check is required to substantiate the central distinction.
  2. [Formalism] Formalism section (loop integrals and propagators): the treatment of the mass-splitting parameter Δ in the heavy-baryon propagators and the resulting 1/Δ factors in the O(p^4) loop diagrams needs explicit justification. When Δ ∼ m_π the usual 1/M_B suppression may be compromised, potentially promoting recoil or higher-order terms that affect the quoted magnetic-polarizability enhancement.
  3. [Chiral Lagrangian / LEC fixing] Determination of LECs (O(p^3) and O(p^4) chiral Lagrangian): the manuscript must state which observables (nucleon data, lattice results, or heavy-baryon decays) are used to fix the low-energy constants appearing at this order and must propagate their uncertainties into the final polarizability tables. Without this, the claim that corrections are 'small' or 'larger' cannot be assessed quantitatively.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the four spin polarizabilities (γ_E1E1, γ_M1M1, etc.) should be defined once in the introduction with explicit reference to the multipole decomposition used.
  2. [Results] Comparison of charmed-baryon spin polarizabilities to nucleon values should specify that the nucleon results are evaluated at the same chiral order and with the same regularization scheme.
  3. [Discussion] A brief remark on the absence of lattice-QCD or experimental constraints on heavy-baryon polarizabilities would help place the predictions in context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions have been made to strengthen the presentation and analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (numerical results) and the discussion following Eq. (XX): the assertion that electric-polarizability corrections are 'small' while magnetic ones are 'relatively larger' rests on the numerical outputs, yet no explicit estimate of O(p^5) contributions or variation of the O(p^4) LECs within their natural ranges is provided. With Δ(Σ_c–Λ_c) ≈ 170 MeV comparable to m_π, the power-counting suppression of higher orders is not obviously guaranteed; a robustness check is required to substantiate the central distinction.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit robustness check strengthens the central claims. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in §4 estimating the expected size of O(p^5) contributions using the chiral expansion parameter m_π/Λ_χ ≈ 0.14 together with the observed O(p^4)/O(p^3) ratios. We have also varied all O(p^4) LECs within their natural ranges (±1 in appropriate units of 1/Λ_χ) and displayed the resulting uncertainty bands on the polarizabilities. These checks confirm that the qualitative distinction between small electric and larger magnetic corrections remains stable. For the power-counting issue with Δ ≈ m_π we note that Δ is counted as O(p) in the standard HBChPT power counting for near-degenerate states; the numerical pattern at O(p^4) is consistent with the expected suppression for the electric sector. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Formalism] Formalism section (loop integrals and propagators): the treatment of the mass-splitting parameter Δ in the heavy-baryon propagators and the resulting 1/Δ factors in the O(p^4) loop diagrams needs explicit justification. When Δ ∼ m_π the usual 1/M_B suppression may be compromised, potentially promoting recoil or higher-order terms that affect the quoted magnetic-polarizability enhancement.

    Authors: The treatment follows the standard HBChPT power counting in which Δ is assigned O(p) while the baryon mass M_B remains a hard scale. The 1/Δ factors arise from the static propagators of the intermediate states but are multiplied by the overall 1/M_B suppression inherent to the heavy-baryon expansion; recoil corrections appear only at higher orders. We have inserted an explicit justification paragraph in the Formalism section, referencing the analogous treatment used for decuplet baryons and for the Σ–Λ splitting in SU(3) HBChPT. The magnetic-polarizability enhancement is therefore a genuine O(p^4) effect within the adopted counting and does not indicate a breakdown of the framework. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Chiral Lagrangian / LEC fixing] Determination of LECs (O(p^3) and O(p^4) chiral Lagrangian): the manuscript must state which observables (nucleon data, lattice results, or heavy-baryon decays) are used to fix the low-energy constants appearing at this order and must propagate their uncertainties into the final polarizability tables. Without this, the claim that corrections are 'small' or 'larger' cannot be assessed quantitatively.

    Authors: We have revised the manuscript to specify the origin of each LEC: the O(p^3) couplings are taken from global fits to nucleon and hyperon magnetic moments and axial charges (Refs. [standard citations]), while the O(p^4) LECs are estimated from naturalness arguments supplemented by available lattice results for heavy-baryon transition moments. A new subsection now propagates uncertainties by varying the LECs within ±50 % of their central values (reflecting the typical uncertainty in such determinations) and presents the resulting bands in Tables 2–4. This allows the reader to assess quantitatively the robustness of the statements concerning the size of corrections. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: polarizabilities computed as outputs of independent HBChPT expansion

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by constructing the O(p^4) heavy-baryon chiral Lagrangian, evaluating the relevant loop diagrams and tree-level contributions to the Compton scattering amplitudes, and extracting the polarizabilities from the low-energy expansion of those amplitudes. Low-energy constants are stated to be taken from external literature or other observables; the numerical results for electric, magnetic, and spin polarizabilities are therefore genuine predictions of the effective theory rather than re-statements of fitted inputs. No self-definitional identities, fitted quantities renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that close the logical chain appear in the derivation. The convergence assumption is an external validity condition, not a circularity within the calculation itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard heavy-baryon chiral Lagrangian whose low-energy constants are determined externally; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Low-energy constants of the O(p^3) and O(p^4) chiral Lagrangian
    Several LECs appear at the working order and must be fixed from other processes or data; their values directly affect the size of the reported corrections.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Chiral symmetry of QCD and its spontaneous breaking
    Foundation of the entire chiral perturbation theory framework used throughout the paper.
  • domain assumption Heavy-quark symmetry in the infinite-mass limit
    Basis for the heavy-baryon formulation that treats the charm or bottom quark as static.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5431 in / 1599 out tokens · 53448 ms · 2026-05-10T18:07:35.983367+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    29 + 70 lnMχ µ M6 −(1 + 2 ln Mχ µ ) 24(C2,ξ + ˜C2,ξ,χ) MN # , β(c2−g3) M,2,ξ,χ = αemg2 1 768π2F 2χ

    as well as those atO(p 4). TheO(p 4) diagrams are displayed in Fig. 1. III. ANALYTICAL EXPRESSIONS This section presents the analytical expressions for the classical and spin polarizabilities derived from theO(p 3) andO(p 4) diagrams. We systematically calculate the amplitude for each diagram, extract the coefficientsA i following Eq. (5), and finally der...

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    ∂ ∂ω J ′ 2((1−x)ω, M 2 χ) − 1 2 ω2(1−cosθ)x(2x−1)(1−x) ∂ ∂ω J ′ 0(−(1−x)ω, M 2 χ) . (B27) For diagramd 3 +e 3: A1,ξ =A X χ D(d3+e3) ξ,χ F 2χM6 I2(M2 χ)− Z 1 0 dx ω 2 G′ 2(xω,0, M 2 χ) i , (B28) A2,ξ =A X χ D(d3+e3) ξ,χ F 2χM6 ω2 − 1 12 I0(M2 χ) + Z 1 0 dx ω 4 x(2x−1)G ′ 0(xω,0, M 2 χ) i , (B29) A3,ξ =A X χ D(d3+e3) ξ,χ F 2χM6 Z 1 0 dx − ω 2 J ′ 2(xω,0, M ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    ∂ ∂ω J ′ 2((1−x)ω−δ, M 2 χ) − 1 2 ω2(1−cosθ)x(2x−1)(1−x) ∂ ∂ω J ′ 0(−(1−x)ω−δ, M 2 χ) . (B84) For diagramd ′ 3 +e ′ 3: A1,ξ =2 3 B X χ D(d3+e3) ξ,χ F 2χM6 I2(M2 χ) + Z 1 0 dx − ω 2 G′ 2(xω, δ, M2 χ) + δ 2 J ′ 2(xω, δ, M2 χ) , (B85) A2,ξ =2 3 B X χ D(d3+e3) ξ,χ F 2χM6 ω2 − 1 12 I0(M2 χ) + Z 1 0 dxx(2x−1) ω 4 G′ 0(xω, δ, M2 χ)− δ 4 J ′ 0(xω, δ, M2 χ) , (B86...

    work page

  4. [4]

    B. R. Holstein and S. Scherer, Hadron Polarizabilities, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.64, 51 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    F. J. Federspiel, R. A. Eisenstein, M. A. Lucas, B. E. MacGibbon, K. Mellendorf, A. M. Nathan, A. O’Neill, and D. P. Wells, The Proton Compton effect: A Mea- surement of the electric and magnetic polarizabilities of the proton, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 1511 (1991)

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    Zieger, R

    A. Zieger, R. Van de Vyver, D. Christmann, A. De Graeve, C. Van den Abeele, and B. Ziegler, 180- degrees Compton scattering by the proton below the pion threshold, Phys. Lett. B278, 34 (1992)

    work page 1992

  7. [7]

    B. E. MacGibbon, G. Garino, M. A. Lucas, A. M. Nathan, G. Feldman, and B. Dolbilkin, Measurement of the electric and magnetic polarizabilities of the proton, Phys. Rev. C52, 2097 (1995)

    work page 2097

  8. [8]

    V. O. de Le´ onet al., Low-energy Compton scattering and the polarizabilities of the proton, Eur. Phys. J. A10, 207 (2001)

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    Blanpiedet al., N —>delta transition and proton polarizabilities from measurements of p (gamma polar- ized, gamma), p (gamma polarized, pi0), and p (gamma polarized, pi+), Phys

    G. Blanpiedet al., N —>delta transition and proton polarizabilities from measurements of p (gamma polar- ized, gamma), p (gamma polarized, pi0), and p (gamma polarized, pi+), Phys. Rev. C64, 025203 (2001)

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    Koester, W

    L. Koester, W. Waschkowski, L. V. Mitsyna, G. S. Samosvat, P. Prokofevs, and J. Tambergs, Neutron elec- tron scattering length and electric polarizability of the neutron derived from cross-sections of bismuth and of lead and its isotopes, Phys. Rev. C51, 3363 (1995)

    work page 1995

  11. [11]

    N. R. Kolb, A. W. Rauf, R. Igarashi, D. L. Hornidge, R. E. Pywell, B. J. Warkentin, E. J. Korkmaz, G. Feld- man, and G. V. O’Rielly, Quasifree Compton scatter- ing from the deuteron and nucleon polarizabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 1388 (2000)

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    Lundinet al., Compton scattering from the deuteron and neutron polarizabilities, Phys

    M. Lundinet al., Compton scattering from the deuteron and neutron polarizabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 192501 (2003)

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    Mornacchi, S

    E. Mornacchi, S. Rodini, B. Pasquini, and P. Pedroni, First Concurrent Extraction of the Leading-Order Scalar and Spin Proton Polarizabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 102501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    E. N. Nikolov, W. Broniowski, and K. Goeke, Electric polarizability of the nucleon in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model, Nucl. Phys. A579, 398 (1994)

    work page 1994

  15. [15]

    Schumacher, Electromagnetic polarizabilities of the nucleon and properties of the sigma-meson pole con- tribution, Eur

    M. Schumacher, Electromagnetic polarizabilities of the nucleon and properties of the sigma-meson pole con- tribution, Eur. Phys. J. A30, 413 (2006), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.A 32, 121 (2007)]

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    Schumacher, Electromagnetic polarizabilities and the excited states of the nucleon, Eur

    M. Schumacher, Electromagnetic polarizabilities and the excited states of the nucleon, Eur. Phys. J. A31, 327 (2007)

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    N. N. Scoccola and T. D. Cohen, Nucleon electric po- larizability in soliton models and the role of the seagull terms, Nucl. Phys. A596, 599 (1996)

    work page 1996

  18. [18]

    Gobbi, C

    C. Gobbi, C. L. Schat, and N. N. Scoccola, Hyperon polarizabilities in the bound state soliton model, Nucl. Phys. A598, 318 (1996)

    work page 1996

  19. [19]

    N. N. Scoccola, H. Weigel, and B. Schwesinger, SU(3) symmetry breaking and octet baryon polarizabilities, Phys. Lett. B389, 433 (1996)

    work page 1996

  20. [20]

    Tanushi, Y

    Y. Tanushi, Y. Nakahara, S. Saito, and M. Uehara, Spin dependent polarizability of nucleon with dispersion rela- tion in the Skyrme model, Phys. Lett. B425, 6 (1998)

    work page 1998

  21. [21]

    B. R. Holstein and A. M. Nathan, Dispersion relations and the nucleon polarizability, Phys. Rev. D49, 6101 (1994)

    work page 1994

  22. [22]

    Drechsel, M

    D. Drechsel, M. Gorchtein, B. Pasquini, and M. Van- derhaeghen, Fixed t subtracted dispersion relations for Compton Scattering off the nucleon, Phys. Rev. C61, 015204 (1999)

    work page 1999

  23. [23]

    B. R. Holstein, D. Drechsel, B. Pasquini, and M. Van- derhaeghen, Higher order polarizabilities of the proton, Phys. Rev. C61, 034316 (2000)

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    Schumacher, Polarizabilities of the nucleon and spin dependent photo-absorption, Nucl

    M. Schumacher, Polarizabilities of the nucleon and spin dependent photo-absorption, Nucl. Phys. A826, 131 (2009)

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    Schumacher and M

    M. Schumacher and M. I. Levchuk, Structure of the nu- cleon and spin-polarizabilities, Nucl. Phys. A858, 48 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Schumacher and M

    M. Schumacher and M. D. Scadron, Dispersion theory of nucleon Compton scattering and polarizabilities, Fortsch. Phys.61, 703 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    Nishikawa, S

    T. Nishikawa, S. Saito, and Y. Kondo, Electric polariz- abilities of neutral baryons in the QCD sum rule, Phys. Lett. B422, 26 (1998)

    work page 1998

  28. [28]

    S. I. Kruglov, Effective Action and Electromagnetic Po- larizabilities of Nucleons in QCD String Theory (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9910514 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1999

  29. [29]

    S. I. Kruglov, Effective actions, radii and electromag- netic polarizabilities of hadrons in QCD string the- ory, Hadronic J. Suppl.17, 103 (2003), arXiv:hep- ph/0110101

    work page arXiv 2003

  30. [30]

    Drechsel, S

    D. Drechsel, S. S. Kamalov, and L. Tiator, The GDH sum rule and related integrals, Phys. Rev. D63, 114010 (2001)

    work page 2001

  31. [31]

    Y.-b. Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, J. Kuckei, V. E. Lyubovitskij, K. Pumsa-ard, and P.-N. Shen, Nucleon polarizabilities in the perturbative chiral quark model, J. Phys. G32, 203 (2006)

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Eichmann, Towards a microscopic understanding of nucleon polarizabilities, Few Body Syst.57, 541 (2016)

    G. Eichmann, Towards a microscopic understanding of nucleon polarizabilities, Few Body Syst.57, 541 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Bernard, N

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U. G. Meissner, Chiral ex- pansion of the nucleon’s electromagnetic polarizabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 1515 (1991)

    work page 1991

  34. [34]

    Bernard, N

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U. G. Meissner, Nucleons with chiral loops: Electromagnetic polarizabilities, Nucl. Phys. B373, 346 (1992)

    work page 1992

  35. [35]

    Bernard, N

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, A. Schmidt, and U. G. Meissner, Consistent calculation of the nucleon electromagnetic po- larizabilities in chiral perturbation theory beyond next- to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B319, 269 (1993)

    work page 1993

  36. [36]

    Bernard, N

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, U. G. Meissner, and A. Schmidt, Aspects of nucleon Compton scattering, Z. Phys. A348, 317 (1994)

    work page 1994

  37. [37]

    M. N. Butler and M. J. Savage, Electromagnetic polariz- ability of the nucleon in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Lett. B294, 369 (1992)

    work page 1992

  38. [38]

    Babusci, G

    D. Babusci, G. Giordano, and G. Matone, Chiral pertur- bation theory and nucleon polarizabilities, Phys. Rev. C 55, R1645 (1997)

    work page 1997

  39. [39]

    S. R. Beane, M. Malheiro, J. A. McGovern, D. R. Phillips, and U. van Kolck, Compton scattering on the proton, neutron, and deuteron in chiral perturbation the- ory to O(Q**4), Nucl. Phys. A747, 311 (2005). 24

    work page 2005

  40. [40]

    Choudhury, A

    D. Choudhury, A. Nogga, and D. R. Phillips, Investigat- ing neutron polarizabilities through Compton scattering on 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 232303 (2007), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 120, 249901 (2018)]

    work page 2007

  41. [41]

    Deshmukh and B

    A. Deshmukh and B. C. Tiburzi, Octet Baryons in Large Magnetic Fields, Phys. Rev. D97, 014006 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Lensky and V

    V. Lensky and V. Pascalutsa, Predictive powers of chiral perturbation theory in Compton scattering off protons, Eur. Phys. J. C65, 195 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Aleksejevs and S

    A. Aleksejevs and S. Barkanova, Hadron Structure in Chiral Perturbation Theory, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 245, 17 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Lensky and J

    V. Lensky and J. A. McGovern, Proton polarizabilities from Compton data using covariant chiral effective field theory, Phys. Rev. C89, 032202 (2014)

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    Hiller Blin, T

    A. Hiller Blin, T. Gutsche, T. Ledwig, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Hyperon forward spin polarizabilityγ 0 in baryon chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D92, 096004 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Lensky, J

    V. Lensky, J. McGovern, and V. Pascalutsa, Predictions of covariant chiral perturbation theory for nucleon polar- isabilities and polarised Compton scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 604 (2015)

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    Th¨ urmann, E

    M. Th¨ urmann, E. Epelbaum, A. M. Gasparyan, and H. Krebs, Nucleon polarizabilities in covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory with explicit ∆ degrees of free- dom, Phys. Rev. C103, 035201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Bernard, N

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U.-G. Meissner, Chiral dy- namics in nucleons and nuclei, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E4, 193 (1995)

    work page 1995

  49. [49]

    T. R. Hemmert, B. R. Holstein, J. Kambor, and G. Knochlein, Compton scattering and the spin struc- ture of the nucleon at low-energies, Phys. Rev. D57, 5746 (1998)

    work page 1998

  50. [50]

    G. C. Gellas, T. R. Hemmert, and U.-G. Meissner, Com- plete one loop analysis of the nucleon’s spin polarizabili- ties, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 14 (2000)

    work page 2000

  51. [51]

    T. R. Hemmert, B. R. Holstein, and J. Kambor, Delta (1232) and the polarizabilities of the nucleon, Phys. Rev. D55, 5598 (1997)

    work page 1997

  52. [52]

    Kambor, The Delta (1232) as an effective degree of freedom in chiral perturbation theory, Lect

    J. Kambor, The Delta (1232) as an effective degree of freedom in chiral perturbation theory, Lect. Notes Phys. 513, 138 (1998)

    work page 1998

  53. [53]

    Ji, C.-W

    X.-D. Ji, C.-W. Kao, and J. Osborne, The Nucleon spin polarizability at order O(p**4) in chiral perturbation the- ory, Phys. Rev. D61, 074003 (2000)

    work page 2000

  54. [54]

    K. B. Vijaya Kumar, J. A. McGovern, and M. C. Birse, Spin polarizabilities of the nucleon at NLO in the chiral expansion, Phys. Lett. B479, 167 (2000)

    work page 2000

  55. [55]

    H. W. Griesshammer, J. A. McGovern, and D. R. Phillips, Nucleon Polarisabilities at and Beyond Physi- cal Pion Masses, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 139 (2016)

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    Kondratyuk and O

    S. Kondratyuk and O. Scholten, Compton scattering on the nucleon at intermediate energies and polarizabilities in a microscopic model, Phys. Rev. C64, 024005 (2001)

    work page 2001

  57. [57]

    A. M. Gasparyan, M. F. M. Lutz, and B. Pasquini, Comp- ton scattering from chiral dynamics with unitarity and causality, Nucl. Phys. A866, 79 (2011)

    work page 2011

  58. [58]

    K. B. Vijaya Kumar, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, B. R. Hol- stein, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Hyperon forward spin po- larizabilty gamma0, Phys. Rev. D84, 076007 (2011)

    work page 2011

  59. [59]

    Bernard, E

    V. Bernard, E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, and U.-G. Meissner, New insights into the spin structure of the nucleon, Phys. Rev. D87, 054032 (2013)

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    Schumacher, Polarizability of the nucleon and Comp- ton scattering, Prog

    M. Schumacher, Polarizability of the nucleon and Comp- ton scattering, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.55, 567 (2005)

    work page 2005

  61. [61]

    Hagelstein, R

    F. Hagelstein, R. Miskimen, and V. Pascalutsa, Nucleon Polarizabilities: from Compton Scattering to Hydrogen Atom, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.88, 29 (2016)

    work page 2016

  62. [62]

    Hagelstein, Nucleon Polarizabilities and Compton Scattering as Playground for Chiral Perturbation The- ory, Symmetry12, 1407 (2020)

    F. Hagelstein, Nucleon Polarizabilities and Compton Scattering as Playground for Chiral Perturbation The- ory, Symmetry12, 1407 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    Fonvieille, B

    H. Fonvieille, B. Pasquini, and N. Sparveris, Virtual Compton Scattering and Nucleon Generalized Polariz- abilities, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.113, 103754 (2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Sparveris, The Proton Electromagnetic Generalized Polarizabilities, Front

    N. Sparveris, The Proton Electromagnetic Generalized Polarizabilities, Front. Phys.12, 1426128 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    J. M. M. Hall, D. B. Leinweber, and R. D. Young, Finite- volume and partial quenching effects in the magnetic polarizability of the neutron, Phys. Rev. D89, 054511 (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    Bignell, W

    R. Bignell, W. Kamleh, and D. Leinweber, Magnetic po- larizability of the nucleon using a Laplacian mode pro- jection, Phys. Rev. D101, 094502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    Kabelitz, R

    T. Kabelitz, R. Bignell, W. Kamleh, and D. Leinweber, Magnetic polarizability of octet baryons via lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D110, 074514 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Endrodi, QCD with background electromagnetic fields on the lattice: A review, Prog

    G. Endrodi, QCD with background electromagnetic fields on the lattice: A review, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.141, 104153 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    Wilcox and F

    W. Wilcox and F. X. Lee, Towards charged hadron po- larizabilities from four-point functions in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D104, 034506 (2021)

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    Wang, Z.-L

    X.-H. Wang, Z.-L. Zhang, X.-H. Cao, C.-L. Fan, X. Feng, Y.-S. Gao, L.-C. Jin, and C. Liu, Nucleon Electric Polar- izabilities and Nucleon-Pion Scattering at the Physical Pion Mass, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 141901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Aiolaet al., Progress towards the first measurement of charm baryon dipole moments, Phys

    S. Aiolaet al., Progress towards the first measurement of charm baryon dipole moments, Phys. Rev. D103, 072003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A 96, 327 (1979)

    S. Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A 96, 327 (1979)

    work page 1979

  73. [73]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop, Annals Phys.158, 142 (1984)

    work page 1984

  74. [74]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral Perturbation The- ory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark, Nucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985)

    work page 1985

  75. [75]

    E. E. Jenkins and A. V. Manohar, Baryon chiral pertur- bation theory using a heavy fermion Lagrangian, Phys. Lett. B255, 558 (1991)

    work page 1991

  76. [76]

    Bernard, N

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, J. Kambor, and U. G. Meissner, Chiral structure of the nucleon, Nucl. Phys. B388, 315 (1992)

    work page 1992

  77. [77]

    A. W. Thomas and W. Weise,The Structure of the Nu- cleon(Wiley, Germany, 2001)

    work page 2001

  78. [78]

    Chen, L.-Z

    Y.-K. Chen, L.-Z. Wen, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Elec- tromagnetic polarizabilities of the spin-12 singly heavy baryons in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D111, 054019 (2025)

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    Wen, Y.-K

    L.-Z. Wen, Y.-K. Chen, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Electro- magnetic polarizabilities of the spin- 3 2 baryons in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1210 (2025)

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Yan, H.-Y

    T.-M. Yan, H.-Y. Cheng, C.-Y. Cheung, G.-L. Lin, Y. C. Lin, and H.-L. Yu, Heavy quark symmetry and chi- ral dynamics, Phys. Rev. D46, 1148 (1992), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 55, 5851 (1997)]

    work page 1992

Showing first 80 references.