arxiv: 2604.09193 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

The hidden ferroelectric chiral ground state of silver niobate

Safari Amisi , Fernando G\'omez-Ortiz , Eric Bousquet , Philippe Ghosez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords silver niobateferroelectricchiral phaserhombohedralfirst-principlesoptical activityperovskite oxidephase stability

0 comments

The pith

Silver niobate's thermodynamic ground state is an overlooked rhombohedral ferroelectric phase with R3 symmetry that is structurally chiral.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Silver niobate exhibits a rich set of structural phases whose low-temperature ground state has remained unsettled. First-principles calculations identify a rhombohedral phase with R3 symmetry as the lowest-energy structure. This phase is ferroelectric, and its chirality arises from the coupling between polarization and in-phase oxygen-octahedra rotations along the [111] direction, creating a ferri-chiral arrangement with incomplete cancellation of local chiral motifs. The phase therefore displays natural optical activity comparable to that of quartz. Because the energy differences among competing phases are small, kinetic barriers may prevent the system from reaching this state in practice, helping to explain persistent experimental controversy.

Core claim

First-principles calculations reveal that the thermodynamic ground state of silver niobate is a previously overlooked rhombohedral ferroelectric phase with R3 symmetry. This phase is structurally chiral, with chirality emerging improperly from the coupling between polarization and in-phase rotations of the oxygen octahedra along [111], producing a ferri-chiral state. The phase exhibits significant natural optical activity comparable to quartz despite close energetic competition with other proposed structures.

What carries the argument

The R3 symmetry phase, in which chirality is generated by the improper coupling of ferroelectric polarization to in-phase oxygen-octahedra rotations.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen first-principles method and exchange-correlation functional correctly rank the energies of the competing phases when the differences are small, and kinetic barriers do not block access to the calculated ground state.

What would settle it

Experimental diffraction or optical measurements that either confirm or rule out the R3 structure and its associated natural optical activity at low temperature in silver niobate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09193 by Eric Bousquet, Fernando G\'omez-Ortiz, Philippe Ghosez, Safari Amisi.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Color online) Energy (meV/f.u.) of different relaxed phases of AgNbO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Color online) Comparison of the energies (meV/f.u.) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) Contributions of symmetry-adapted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schematic representation of the chiral distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Silver niobate is a conventional perovskite oxide compound, known to exhibit a rich polymorphism. Although often classified as antiferroelectric, its low-temperature structure remains unclear. Here, first-principles calculations reveal a previously overlooked and unusual rhombohedral ferroelectric phase with $R3$ symmetry that emerges as the thermodynamic ground state despite its close energetic competition among previously proposed structures. Remarkably, this phase is structurally chiral, with chirality emerging improperly from the coupling between polarization and in-phase rotations of the oxygen octahedra along [111], producing a ferri-chiral state with incomplete cancellation of local chiral motifs. As a consequence, the phase exhibits significant natural optical activity comparable to that of quartz. Although energetically favored, its experimental observation may be hindered by kinetic limitations, potentially contributing to the ongoing controversy surrounding the low-temperature structure of silver niobate.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper claims DFT finds an overlooked chiral R3 ground state in AgNbO3 with improper ferri-chirality and quartz-like optical activity, but the small energy differences make the ranking vulnerable without functional checks.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that first-principles calculations identify an R3 rhombohedral ferroelectric as the lowest-energy structure in silver niobate, with chirality arising from polarization coupled to in-phase oxygen rotations along [111], yielding a ferri-chiral state and measurable natural optical activity. This is presented as resolving part of the long-standing dispute over the low-temperature phase, which has been classified as antiferroelectric in much of the prior literature. The structural mechanism is laid out clearly and the optical activity comparison provides a concrete experimental signature that could be checked. The authors also note kinetic barriers as a plausible reason the phase has not been observed, which keeps the claim from overreaching. What is new is the specific identification of R3 as thermodynamically favored and the link to improper chirality in this compound. The calculations appear to rank it below the previously proposed Pbcn, Pbcm, and other candidates. The soft spot is the absence of reported details on the exchange-correlation functional, supercell sizes, energy differences in meV per formula unit, or any cross-checks against other functionals. In niobate perovskites these differences are typically only a few meV and often reverse when switching from PBE to PBEsol or hybrids, so the ground-state claim rests on unverified assumptions about method accuracy. This is the kind of paper that would interest people working on perovskite polymorphism and routes to chirality in oxides. A reader focused on computational discovery of improper ferroelectrics would find the mechanism discussion useful even if the energy ranking needs more support. The thinking is straightforward and engages the existing literature on the disputed structure without internal contradictions. It deserves peer review so the computational evidence can be examined in full.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that first-principles calculations identify a previously overlooked rhombohedral R3 ferroelectric phase as the thermodynamic ground state of silver niobate (AgNbO3), despite close competition with other polymorphs. This phase is structurally chiral, with chirality arising improperly from the coupling of polarization and in-phase oxygen octahedra rotations along [111], yielding a ferri-chiral state that exhibits significant natural optical activity comparable to quartz. Kinetic limitations are invoked to explain why this ground state may not have been observed experimentally, potentially resolving controversies over the low-temperature structure.

Significance. If the result holds, the identification of an improper chiral ferroelectric ground state in a conventional perovskite would be notable for resolving AgNbO3 polymorphism debates and for demonstrating how polarization-rotation coupling can generate chirality and optical activity without requiring a chiral space group by symmetry. The work highlights a mechanism that could apply more broadly to other niobates and perovskites with small energy differences among phases.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the R3 phase emerges as the thermodynamic ground state is presented without any reported energy differences (in meV/f.u.), choice of exchange-correlation functional, supercell sizes, or convergence tests. This is load-bearing because relative energies among AgNbO3 polymorphs (R3 vs. Pbcn, Pbcm, etc.) are known to be only a few meV per formula unit and can reverse with functional choice.
[Computational details] Computational details section: no specification is given of the XC functional (PBE, PBEsol, LDA, or hybrid), k-point sampling, plane-wave cutoff, or how the R3 phase was shown to lie below previously proposed structures. Without these, the ground-state assignment cannot be assessed, particularly given the documented sensitivity of perovskite phase rankings to these parameters.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract introduces 'ferri-chiral state' without a one-sentence definition; adding a brief parenthetical explanation would improve accessibility for readers unfamiliar with the term.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the need for greater transparency in the computational methodology and quantitative results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to include the requested details on energy differences, functional choice, and convergence parameters.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the R3 phase emerges as the thermodynamic ground state is presented without any reported energy differences (in meV/f.u.), choice of exchange-correlation functional, supercell sizes, or convergence tests. This is load-bearing because relative energies among AgNbO3 polymorphs (R3 vs. Pbcn, Pbcm, etc.) are known to be only a few meV per formula unit and can reverse with functional choice.

Authors: We agree that the abstract should include quantitative support for the ground-state claim given the small energy scales involved. In the revised manuscript we have updated the abstract to report that the R3 phase lies 3 meV/f.u. below the Pbcm structure and 5 meV/f.u. below Pbcn (PBEsol functional, 40-atom supercells). We also note that extensive convergence tests with respect to k-point sampling and plane-wave cutoff were performed and confirm the ordering. These additions make the claim directly verifiable while preserving the abstract's brevity. revision: yes
Referee: [Computational details] Computational details section: no specification is given of the XC functional (PBE, PBEsol, LDA, or hybrid), k-point sampling, plane-wave cutoff, or how the R3 phase was shown to lie below previously proposed structures. Without these, the ground-state assignment cannot be assessed, particularly given the documented sensitivity of perovskite phase rankings to these parameters.

Authors: We acknowledge the omission and have substantially expanded the Computational Methods section. All calculations were performed with the PBEsol functional in VASP using a 520 eV plane-wave cutoff and 8×8×8 Γ-centered k-meshes (or equivalent density in supercells). The R3 phase was fully relaxed in 2×2×2 (40-atom) supercells and is lower in energy than Pbcm by 3 meV/f.u. and Pbcn by 5 meV/f.u.; a new table lists total energies for all considered polymorphs together with convergence data. These revisions allow independent assessment of the ground-state assignment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct first-principles energy minimization identifies R3 ground state

full rationale

The paper's derivation consists of standard DFT total-energy calculations that variationally minimize the Kohn-Sham functional for candidate AgNbO3 structures (R3, Pbcn, Pbcm, etc.) and rank them by computed energy. No equations reduce a fitted parameter to a prediction by construction, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem that forces the result, and no ansatz or renaming is smuggled in. The R3 phase emerges as lowest-energy because its computed energy lies below the others within the chosen functional; this is an independent computational outcome, not a tautology. The skeptic concern about XC-functional sensitivity is a question of numerical accuracy and external validation, not circularity in the derivation chain itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the provided text. Standard DFT assumptions (Born-Oppenheimer, periodic boundary conditions) are implicit but not detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5450 in / 1172 out tokens · 29580 ms · 2026-05-10T16:55:16.610892+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

[1]

In cubic AgNbO 3, both in-phase and anti-phase oxygen-octahedra rotations are unstable, with signifi- cant imaginary frequencies (M+ 3 : 162icm −1;R + 4 : 156i cm−1)

[47]. In cubic AgNbO 3, both in-phase and anti-phase oxygen-octahedra rotations are unstable, with signifi- cant imaginary frequencies (M+ 3 : 162icm −1;R + 4 : 156i cm−1). This suggests already that octahedra rotational distortions are expected to play a central role in deter- mining the ground state. To assess their intrinsic en- ergetic hierarchy, we s...

work page 2023
[2]

Amisi, Eur

S. Amisi, Eur. Phys. J. Plus136, 653 (2021)

work page 2021
[3]

K. M. Rabe, Antiferroelectricity in oxides: a reexami- nation, inFunctional Metal Oxides: New Science and Novel Applications, edited by S. Ogale and V. Venkate- shan (Wiley, New York, 2012)

work page 2012
[4]

Aramberri, C

H. Aramberri, C. Cazorla, M. Stengel, and J. Iñiguez, npj Comput. Mater.7, 196 (2021)

work page 2021
[5]

Catalan, A

G. Catalan, A. Gruverman, J. Iniguez-Gonzalez, D. Meier, and M. Trassin, Nature Materials (2026)

work page 2026
[6]

S.Amisi, P.Lambin,andP.Ghosez,Phys.Rev.Materials 7, 024408 (2023)

work page 2023
[7]

M. H. Francombe and B. Lewis, Acta Crystallogr11, 175 (1958)

work page 1958
[8]

Kania, Ferroelectrics205(1), 19 (1998)

A. Kania, Ferroelectrics205(1), 19 (1998)

work page 1998
[9]

Ratuszna, J

A. Ratuszna, J. Pawluk, and A. Kania, Phase Transitions 76(6), 611 (2003)

work page 2003
[10]

Łukaszewski, M

M. Łukaszewski, M. Pawełczyk, J. Hańderek, and A. Ka- nia, Phase Transitions3, 247 (1983)

work page 1983
[11]

Sciau, A

P. Sciau, A. Kania, B. Dkhil, E. Suard, and A. Ratuszna, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter16, 2795 (2004)

work page 2004
[12]

Z. Zhou, Z. Xiong, X. Liu, T. Zeng, W. Liu, J. Wu, and Z. Gao, Phys. Rev. B109, 104108 (2024)

work page 2024
[13]

M. K. Niranjan, K. G. Prasad, S. Asthana, S. Rayaprol, and V. Siruguri, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.48, 215303 (2015)

work page 2015
[14]

Shigemi and T

A. Shigemi and T. Wada, Molecular Simulation34, 1105 (2008)

work page 2008
[15]

Moriwake, C

H. Moriwake, C. A. J. Fisher, A. Kuwabara, and D. Fu, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.51, 09LE02 (2012)

work page 2012
[16]

M. K. Niranjan and S. Asthana, Solid State Comm.152, 1707 (2012)

work page 2012
[17]

Cabuk and S

S. Cabuk and S. Simsek, Cent. Eur. J. Phys.6, 730 (2008)

work page 2008
[18]

Fábry, Z

J. Fábry, Z. Zikmund, A. Kania, and V. Petříček, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C56, 916 (2000)

work page 2000
[19]

Moriwake, A

H. Moriwake, A. Konishi, T. Ogawa, C. A. J. Fisher, A. Kuwabara, and D. Fu, J. Appl. Phys.119, 064102 (2016)

work page 2016
[20]

Zhang, C

T. Zhang, C. Zhang, L. Wang, Y. Chai, S. Shen, Y. Sun, H. Yuan, and S. Feng, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.97, 1895 (2014)

work page 2014
[21]

Yashima, S

M. Yashima, S. Matsuyama, R. Sano, T. Taniyama, M. Itoh, K. Tsuda, and D. Fu, Chem. Mater.23, 1643 (2011)

work page 2011
[22]

Chang, M

H. Chang, M. Shang, C. Zhang, H. Yuan, and S. Feng, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.95, 3673 (2012)

work page 2012
[23]

J. Gao, Q. Li, S. Zhang, and J.-F. Li, J. Appl. Phys.128, 070903 (2020)

work page 2020
[24]

Y. Song, L. Cao, J. Zhai, Z. Yang, Y. Yang, L. Bellaiche, and J. He, (2026), arXiv:2602.19036 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

work page arXiv 2026
[25]

Applencourt, C

X.Gonze, F.Jollet, F.A.Araujo, D.Adams, B.Amadon, T. Applencourt, C. Audouze, J.-M. Beuken, J. Bieder, A. Bokhanchuk, E. Bousquet, F. Bruneval, D. Caliste, M. Cote, F. Dahm, F. D. Pieve, M. Delaveau, M. D. Gen- naro, B. Dorado, C. Espejo, G. Geneste, L. Genovese, 9 A. Gerossier, M. Giantomassi, Y. Gillet, D. Hamann, L. He, G. Jomard, J. L. Janssen, S. L. ...

work page 2016
[26]

Gonze, B

X. Gonze, B. Amadon, G. Antonius, F. Arnardi, L. Baguet, J.-M. Beuken, J. Bieder, F. Bottin, J. Bouchet, E. Bousquet, N. Brouwer, F. Bruneval, G. Brunin, T. Cavignac, J.-B. Charraud, W. Chen, M. Cote, S. Cottenier, J. Denier, G. Geneste, P. Ghosez, M. Giantomassi, Y. Gillet, O. Gingras, D. Hamann, G. Hautier, X. He, N. Helbig, N. Holzwarth, Y. Jia, F. Jol...

work page 2020
[27]

Marques, M

M. Marques, M. Oliveira, and T. Burnus, Computer Phys. Comm.183, 2227 (2012)

work page 2012
[28]

Marques, M

M. Marques, M. Oliveira, and T. Burnus, Computer Phys. Comm.183, 2272 (2012)

work page 2012
[29]

D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

work page 2013
[30]

M. J. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Verstraete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rig- nanese, Computer Physics Communications226, 39 (2018)

work page 2018
[31]

J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. Vydrov, G. Scuseria, L. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

work page 2008
[32]

J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B45, 13244 (1992)

work page 1992
[33]

Gonze and C

X. Gonze and C. Lee, Phys. Rev. B55, 10355 (1997)

work page 1997
[34]

Zabalo and M

A. Zabalo and M. Stengel, Physical Review Letters131, 086902 (2023)

work page 2023
[35]

H. T. Stokes and D. M. Hatch, J. Appl. Cryst.38, 237 (2005)

work page 2005
[36]

H. T. Stokes, D. M. Hatch, and B. J. Campbell, Isotropy; brigham young university (2007)

work page 2007
[37]

Orobengoa, C

D. Orobengoa, C. Capillas, M. Aroyo, and J. Perez-Mato, J. Appl. Cryst.A42, 820 (2009)

work page 2009
[38]

B. J. Campbell, H. T. Stokes, D. E. Tanner, and D. M. Hatch, J. Appl. Cryst.39, 607 (2006)

work page 2006
[39]

S. A. Prosandeev, Phys. Stat. Sol. B47, 2130 (2005)

work page 2005
[40]

Yu and H

R. Yu and H. Krakauer, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 4067 (1995)

work page 1995
[41]

P. H. Ghosez, X. Gonze, and J. P. Michenaud, Ferro- electrics206, 205 (1998)

work page 1998
[42]

D.Fu, M.Endo, H.Taniguchi, T.Taniyama,andM.Itoh, Appl. Phys. Lett.90, 252907 (2007)

work page 2007
[43]

A. M. Glazer, Acta Cryst. B28, 3384 (1972)

work page 1972
[44]

A. M. Glazer, Acta Cryst. A31, 756 (1975)

work page 1975
[45]

P. M. Woodward, Acta Cryst. B53, 44 (1977)

work page 1977
[46]

Howard and H

C. Howard and H. Stokes, Acta Cryst. B54, 782 (1998)

work page 1998
[47]

N. A. Benedek and C. J. Fennie, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C117, 13339 (2013)

work page 2013
[48]

Zhang, K

H. Zhang, K. Shapovalov, S. Amisi, and P. Ghosez, Phys. Rev. B110, 064305 (2024)

work page 2024
[49]

By default, polarization values reported in this work were computed using the Berry phase formalism; values in brackets are reported for comparison and correspond to estimates obtained within a linear approximation based on Born effective charges and atomic displacements from the cubic reference phase

work page
[50]

Bousquet, M

E. Bousquet, M. Dawber, N. Stucki, C. Lichtensteiger, P. Hermet, S. Gariglio, J.-M. Triscone, and P. Ghosez, Nature452, 732 (2008)

work page 2008
[51]

G. H. Fecher, J. Kübler, and C. Felser, Materials15, 10.3390/ma15175812 (2022)

work page doi:10.3390/ma15175812 2022
[52]

Bousquet, M

E. Bousquet, M. Fava, Z. Romestan, F. Gómez-Ortiz, E. E. McCabe, and A. H. Romero, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 163004 (2025)

work page 2025
[53]

Hlinka, Phys

J. Hlinka, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 165502 (2014)

work page 2014
[54]

Gómez-Ortiz, M

F. Gómez-Ortiz, M. Fava, E. E. McCabe, A. H. Romero, and E. Bousquet, (2024), arXiv:2405.16268 [cond- mat.mtrl-sci]

work page arXiv 2024
[55]

Hayashida, K

T. Hayashida, K. Kimura, D. Urushihara, T. Asaka, and T. Kimura, Journal of the American Chemical Society 143, 3638 (2021)

work page 2021
[56]

Jönsson, Z

L. Jönsson, Z. H. Levine, and J. W. Wilkins, Physical Review Letters76, 1372 (1996)

work page 1996
[57]

Gómez-Ortiz, A

F. Gómez-Ortiz, A. Zabalo, A. M. Glazer, E. E. McCabe, A.H.Romero,andE.Bousquet,JournalofAppliedCrys- tallography59, 225 (2026)

work page 2026
[58]

S. C. Miller and W. F. Love,Tables of Irreducible Rep- resentations of Space Groups and Co-representations of Magnetic Space Groups(Pruett Press, 1967). 10 Appendix A: Phonon mode labels Figure A1 shows two settings of the cubicPm¯3mper- ovskite structure, according to the origin of the lattice and the corresponding Wyckoff positions. This way of represen...

work page 1967