pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10268 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-11 · 💻 cs.CV

EditCrafter: Tuning-free High-Resolution Image Editing via Pretrained Diffusion Model

Kunho Kim , Sumin Seo , Yongjun Cho , Hyungjin Chung This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords high-resolution image editingdiffusion modelstuning-free editingtiled inversionclassifier-free guidancepretrained modelsimage generation
0
0 comments X

The pith

EditCrafter enables high-resolution image editing with pretrained diffusion models without any fine-tuning by using tiled inversion and a modified guidance step.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces EditCrafter as a pipeline that lets users edit images at resolutions well above the sizes used to train current text-to-image diffusion models. Prior editing techniques either stay locked to low training resolutions or produce unrealistic structures and repeated patterns when applied patch by patch to larger inputs. EditCrafter first runs a tiled inversion step that keeps the original high-resolution image's identity in latent form. It then applies noise-damped manifold-constrained classifier-free guidance, called NDCFG++, to steer the generation into coherent edits from that latent. Experiments indicate this combination yields strong editing results at varied resolutions and aspect ratios with no model changes or per-image optimization required.

Core claim

EditCrafter operates by first performing tiled inversion, which preserves the original identity of the input high-resolution image. We further propose a noise-damped manifold-constrained classifier-free guidance (NDCFG++) that is tailored for high resolution image editing from the inverted latent. Our experiments show that our EditCrafter can achieve impressive editing results across various resolutions without fine-tuning and optimization.

What carries the argument

tiled inversion to preserve the high-resolution input identity, paired with noise-damped manifold-constrained classifier-free guidance (NDCFG++) to produce coherent edits from the resulting latent

If this is right

  • High-resolution images and images with non-square aspect ratios become editable using only models trained at 512x512 or 1024x1024.
  • Advanced editing tasks no longer require separate fine-tuning or optimization loops for each new image or resolution.
  • Pretrained generative models can support practical applications on large photos, detailed artwork, or wide-format content without retraining.
  • A wider range of text-guided edits become available at scales that currently exceed direct model use.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same tiling-plus-damped-guidance pattern could extend to other diffusion tasks such as high-resolution inpainting or video frame editing.
  • If NDCFG++ reliably suppresses artifacts, similar noise-damping adjustments might improve standard classifier-free guidance in lower-resolution settings as well.
  • Because no per-image optimization occurs, the approach may suit interactive or batch editing workflows where speed matters.

Load-bearing premise

Tiled inversion keeps the original identity of a high-resolution input intact in latent space, and NDCFG++ then generates edits that stay coherent without adding unrealistic structures or repetition.

What would settle it

Running the pipeline on a high-resolution test image and observing repeated object patterns, distorted shapes, or loss of original subject identity that match the failures of simple patch-wise editing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10268 by Hyungjin Chung, Kunho Kim, Sumin Seo, Yongjun Cho.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Our proposed framework, EDITCRAFTER, facilitates text-guided image editing at resolutions up to 4K while meticulously preserving the high-resolution details of the input images using only a single editing prompt. Abstract We propose EDITCRAFTER, a high-resolution image edit￾ing method that operates without tuning, leveraging pre￾trained text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models to process im￾ages at resolutions… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The overview of EDITCRAFTER pipeline. Since direct inversion of high-resolution images using the pretrained Stable Diffusion (SD) model is not feasible, we first perform tiled DDIM inversion to generate a high-resolution latent representation. Utilizing this latent, the reverse diffusion process is carried out with a re-dilated noise estimator. To enhance the quality of text-guided editing, we propose mani… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The first and third rows visualize the decoded latents over successive denoising steps. The second and fourth rows show the guidance residual—i.e., the difference between the dilated con￾ditional and unconditional predictions ϵc(zt)−ϵ∅(zt). As denois￾ing progresses, our method (NDCFG++) preserves more semanti￾cally faithful signal and suppresses background noise, compared with directly applying ScaleCrafte… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparisons. (1) Original image, (2) Ours, and (3) CSD in 4×, 8× and 16× settings. Best viewed on screen with zoom. The high-quality versions are provided in the supplementary material. panoramic images, yielding a total of 150 prompt-image pairs. For creating editing prompts, we applied a word￾swapping technique to the original prompts used for image generation, replacing nouns that describe t… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ablation study qualitative results on the 16× SD 2.1 . Method ImageReward ↑ HPSv2 ↑ CLIP Score ↑ Tiled Inv. + ScaleCrafter [18] 1.2595 0.2962 34.9431 Ours w/o NDCFG++ 1.6273 0.2911 35.0254 Ours 1.6689 0.3017 35.3194 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose EditCrafter, a high-resolution image editing method that operates without tuning, leveraging pretrained text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models to process images at resolutions significantly exceeding those used during training. Leveraging the generative priors of large-scale T2I diffusion models enables the development of a wide array of novel generation and editing applications. Although numerous image editing methods have been proposed based on diffusion models and exhibit high-quality editing results, they are difficult to apply to images with arbitrary aspect ratios or higher resolutions since they only work at the training resolutions (512x512 or 1024x1024). Naively applying patch-wise editing fails with unrealistic object structures and repetition. To address these challenges, we introduce EditCrafter, a simple yet effective editing pipeline. EditCrafter operates by first performing tiled inversion, which preserves the original identity of the input high-resolution image. We further propose a noise-damped manifold-constrained classifier-free guidance (NDCFG++) that is tailored for high resolution image editing from the inverted latent. Our experiments show that the our EditCrafter can achieve impressive editing results across various resolutions without fine-tuning and optimization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes EditCrafter, a tuning-free pipeline for high-resolution image editing with pretrained text-to-image diffusion models. It performs tiled inversion on the input to preserve identity, then applies a proposed noise-damped manifold-constrained classifier-free guidance (NDCFG++) during denoising to produce coherent edits at resolutions far above the model's training size, claiming to avoid the unrealistic structures and repetition seen in naive patch-wise methods.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, the work would be significant: it would demonstrate a practical way to extend pretrained diffusion models to arbitrary high resolutions and aspect ratios for editing without per-image optimization or fine-tuning, directly addressing a clear limitation of current diffusion-based editors.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'our experiments show that our EditCrafter can achieve impressive editing results across various resolutions' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, baselines, reconstruction fidelity scores (PSNR/SSIM), identity-preservation measures, or ablation results. This is load-bearing because the paper's value rests on the assertion that tiled inversion plus NDCFG++ succeed where patch-wise editing fails.
  2. [Method] The description of tiled inversion and NDCFG++ (including the damping and manifold constraint) provides no equations, pseudocode, or hyper-parameter settings, making it impossible to verify that the method is parameter-free or reproducible and to test the weakest assumption that identity is preserved at resolutions >> training size.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains the grammatical error 'the our EditCrafter'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'our experiments show that our EditCrafter can achieve impressive editing results across various resolutions' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, baselines, reconstruction fidelity scores (PSNR/SSIM), identity-preservation measures, or ablation results. This is load-bearing because the paper's value rests on the assertion that tiled inversion plus NDCFG++ succeed where patch-wise editing fails.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract's claim relies primarily on qualitative demonstrations rather than quantitative metrics. The manuscript presents visual comparisons across resolutions to illustrate that tiled inversion combined with NDCFG++ avoids the unrealistic structures and repetitions of naive patch-wise approaches. We agree that this is a load-bearing point and that quantitative support would strengthen the contribution. In the revision we will update the abstract to reflect the evaluation methodology more precisely and add quantitative results including identity-preservation scores (e.g., CLIP similarity and face-recognition metrics where applicable), reconstruction fidelity where meaningful, and ablation studies comparing against patch-wise baselines. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Method] The description of tiled inversion and NDCFG++ (including the damping and manifold constraint) provides no equations, pseudocode, or hyper-parameter settings, making it impossible to verify that the method is parameter-free or reproducible and to test the weakest assumption that identity is preserved at resolutions >> training size.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on formal description and reproducibility. The original manuscript presents tiled inversion and the components of NDCFG++ (noise damping and manifold constraint) in prose to keep the exposition accessible. We agree that equations, pseudocode, and explicit hyper-parameter values are necessary. In the revised manuscript we will supply the mathematical formulation of the noise-damped manifold-constrained classifier-free guidance, the damping schedule, the manifold projection step, and algorithmic pseudocode for the full pipeline. We will also list all hyper-parameters used in the reported experiments, confirming that no per-image tuning or optimization is required beyond standard diffusion sampling settings. This will enable direct verification of identity preservation at resolutions substantially larger than the model's training size. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; method claims rest on empirical pipeline rather than self-referential reductions.

full rationale

The paper describes EditCrafter as a tuning-free pipeline that applies tiled inversion to preserve high-resolution identity followed by NDCFG++ guidance on pretrained diffusion latents. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivations appear in the abstract or described components that reduce by construction to their own inputs (e.g., no parameter fitted to a subset then renamed as a prediction, no self-defined uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz smuggled via self-citation). Central claims are framed as experimental outcomes on arbitrary resolutions, not as tautological consequences of the method definition itself. This matches the default expectation for non-circular papers where the derivation chain is self-contained against external pretrained models and qualitative/quantitative validation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no equations, parameters, or explicit assumptions; therefore no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5514 in / 975 out tokens · 40481 ms · 2026-05-10T16:10:39.604688+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    MultiDiffusion: Fusing Diffusion Paths for Controlled Image Generation

    Omer Bar-Tal, Lior Yariv, Yaron Lipman, and Tali Dekel. MultiDiffusion: Fusing Diffusion Paths for Controlled Image Generation. InICML, 2023. 2, 3

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Tim Brooks, Aleksander Holynski, and Alexei A. Efros. Instructpix2pix: Learning to follow image edit- ing instructions, 2023. 3, 7

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    MasaCtrl: Tuning-Free Mutual Self-Attention Control for Con- sistent Image Synthesis and Editing

    Mingdeng Cao, Xintao Wang, Zhongang Qi, Ying Shan, Xiaohu Qie, and Yinqiang Zheng. MasaCtrl: Tuning-Free Mutual Self-Attention Control for Con- sistent Image Synthesis and Editing. InICCV, 2023. 2, 3

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Duygu Ceylan, Chun-Hao Paul Huang, and Niloy J. Mitra. Pix2Video: Video Editing using Image Diffu- sion. InICCV, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Attend-and-Excite: Attention- Based Semantic Guidance for Text-to-Image Diffu- sion Models.ACM Trans

    Hila Chefer, Yuval Alaluf, Yael Vinker, Lior Wolf, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Attend-and-Excite: Attention- Based Semantic Guidance for Text-to-Image Diffu- sion Models.ACM Trans. Graph., 2023. 2, 3

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    PixArt-Σ: Weak-to- Strong Training of Diffusion Transformer for 4K Text- to-Image Generation

    Junsong Chen, Chongjian Ge, Enze Xie, Yue Wu, Lewei Yao, Xiaozhe Ren, Zhongdao Wang, Ping Luo, Huchuan Lu, and Zhenguo Li. PixArt-Σ: Weak-to- Strong Training of Diffusion Transformer for 4K Text- to-Image Generation. InECCV, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    PixArt-α: Fast Training of Diffusion Transformer for Photorealistic Text-to-Image Synthesis

    Junsong Chen, Jincheng Yu, Chongjian Ge, Lewei Yao, Enze Xie, Yue Wu, Zhongdao Wang, James Kwok, Ping Luo, Huchuan Lu, and Zhenguo Li. PixArt-α: Fast Training of Diffusion Transformer for Photorealistic Text-to-Image Synthesis. InICLR,

    work page

  8. [8]

    CFG++: Manifold- constrained Classifier Free Guidance for Diffusion Models

    Hyungjin Chung, Jeongsol Kim, Geon Yeong Park, Hyelin Nam, and Jong Chul Ye. CFG++: Manifold- constrained Classifier Free Guidance for Diffusion Models. InICLR, 2025. 6

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    DiffEdit: Diffusion- based semantic image editing with mask guidance

    Guillaume Couairon, Jakob Verbeek, Holger Schwenk, and Matthieu Cord. DiffEdit: Diffusion- based semantic image editing with mask guidance. In ICLR, 2023. 5

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    TurboEdit: Text-Based Image Editing Using Few-Step Diffusion Models

    Gilad Deutch, Rinon Gal, Daniel Garibi, Or Patash- nik, and Daniel Cohen-Or. TurboEdit: Text-Based Image Editing Using Few-Step Diffusion Models. In ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Proceedings,

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis

    Prafulla Dhariwal and Alex Nichol. Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis. InNeurIPS, 2021. 5

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis

    Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas M ¨uller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Dominik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, Dustin Podell, Tim Dockhorn, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Alex Goodwin, Yannik Marek, and Robin Rombach. Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis. InICML, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    ReNO: Enhancing One-step Text-to-Image Models through Reward-based Noise Optimization

    Luca Eyring, Shyamgopal Karthik, Karsten Roth, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Zeynep Akata. ReNO: Enhancing One-step Text-to-Image Models through Reward-based Noise Optimization. InNeurIPS, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Bermano, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen-Or

    Rinon Gal, Or Patashnik, Haggai Maron, Amit H. Bermano, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen-Or. StyleGAN-NADA: CLIP-Guided Domain Adaptation of Image Generators.ACM TOG, 2022. 12

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    ReNoise: Real Image Inversion Through Iterative Noising

    Daniel Garibi, Or Patashnik, Andrey V oynov, Hadar Averbuch-Elor, and Daniel Cohen-Or. ReNoise: Real Image Inversion Through Iterative Noising. InECCV,

    work page

  16. [16]

    CLIPstyler: Image Style Transfer with a Single Text Condition

    Jong Chul Ye Gihyun Kwon. CLIPstyler: Image Style Transfer with a Single Text Condition. InCVPR, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    ProxEdit: Improv- ing Tuning-Free Real Image Editing with Proximal Guidance

    Ligong Han, Song Wen, Qi Chen, Zhixing Zhang, Kunpeng Song, Mengwei Ren, Ruijiang Gao, Anasta- sis Stathopoulos, Xiaoxiao He, Yuxiao Chen, Di Liu, Qilong Zhangli, Jindong Jiang, Zhaoyang Xia, Akash Srivastava, and Dimitris Metaxas. ProxEdit: Improv- ing Tuning-Free Real Image Editing with Proximal Guidance. InWACV, 2024. 2, 3, 5, 13

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Scale- Crafter: Tuning-free Higher-Resolution Visual Gener- ation with Diffusion Models

    Yingqing He, Shaoshu Yang, Haoxin Chen, Xi- aodong Cun, Menghan Xia, Yong Zhang, Xintao Wang, Ran He, Qifeng Chen, and Ying Shan. Scale- Crafter: Tuning-free Higher-Resolution Visual Gener- ation with Diffusion Models. InICLR, 2024. 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Prompt-to- Prompt Image Editing with Cross-Attention Control

    Amir Hertz, Ron Mokady, Jay Tenenbaum, Kfir Aber- man, Yael Pritch, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Prompt-to- Prompt Image Editing with Cross-Attention Control. InICLR, 2023. 2, 3

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Caption- ing

    Jack Hessel, Ari Holtzman, Maxwell Forbes, Ro- nan Le Bras, and Yejin Choi. CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Caption- ing. InEMNLP, 2021. 7, 8, 12, 13

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Classifier-Free Dif- fusion Guidance

    Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. Classifier-Free Dif- fusion Guidance. InNeurIPS 2021 Workshop on Deep Generative Models and Downstream Applica- tions, 2022. 2, 4

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. InNeurIPS, 2020. 3, 4, 5

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Jonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey Gritsenko, William Chan, Mohammad Norouzi, and David J. Fleet. Video Diffusion Models. InNeurIPS, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    FouriScale: A Frequency Perspective on Training- Free High-Resolution Image Synthesis

    Linjiang Huang, Rongyao Fang, Aiping Zhang, Guan- glu Song, Si Liu, Yu Liu, and Hongsheng Li. FouriScale: A Frequency Perspective on Training- Free High-Resolution Image Synthesis. InECCV,

    work page

  25. [25]

    An Edit Friendly DDPM Noise Space: Inversion and Manipulations

    Inbar Huberman-Spiegelglas, Vladimir Kulikov, and Tomer Michaeli. An Edit Friendly DDPM Noise Space: Inversion and Manipulations. InCVPR, 2024. 2, 3

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A. Efros. Image-to-image translation with con- ditional adversarial networks, 2017. 3

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Collaborative Score Distillation for Consistent Visual Synthesis

    Subin Kim, Kyungmin Lee, June Suk Choi, Jongheon Jeong, Kihyuk Sohn, and Jinwoo Shin. Collaborative Score Distillation for Consistent Visual Synthesis. In NeurIPS, 2023. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 18, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    SALAD: Part-Level Latent Diffusion for 3D Shape Generation and Manipulation

    Juil Koo, Seungwoo Yoo, Minh Hieu Nguyen, and Minhyuk Sung. SALAD: Part-Level Latent Diffusion for 3D Shape Generation and Manipulation. InICCV,

    work page

  29. [29]

    FLUX.https://github

    Black Forest Labs. FLUX.https://github. com/black-forest-labs/flux, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Space, 2025

    Black Forest Labs, Stephen Batifol, Andreas Blattmann, Frederic Boesel, Saksham Consul, Cyril Diagne, Tim Dockhorn, Jack English, Zion English, Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Kyle Lacey, Yam Levi, Cheng Li, Dominik Lorenz, Jonas M ¨uller, Dustin Podell, Robin Rombach, Harry Saini, Axel Sauer, and Luke Smith. FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Imag...

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    SyncDiffusion: Coherent Montage via Synchronized Joint Diffusions

    Yuseung Lee, Kunho Kim, Hyunjin Kim, and Min- hyuk Sung. SyncDiffusion: Coherent Montage via Synchronized Joint Diffusions. InNeurIPS, 2023. 2, 3

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Magic3d: High-resolution text-to-3d content creation

    Chen-Hsuan Lin, Jun Gao, Luming Tang, Towaki Takikawa, Xiaohui Zeng, Xun Huang, Karsten Kreis, Sanja Fidler, Ming-Yu Liu, and Tsung-Yi Lin. Magic3d: High-resolution text-to-3d content creation. InCVPR, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Null-Text Inversion for Edit- ing Real Images Using Guided Diffusion Models

    Ron Mokady, Amir Hertz, Kfir Aberman, Yael Pritch, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Null-Text Inversion for Edit- ing Real Images Using Guided Diffusion Models. In CVPR, 2023. 2, 3, 5, 13

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    SwiftEdit: Lightning Fast Text-Guided Image Editing via One-Step Diffu- sion

    Trong-Tung Nguyen, Quang Nguyen, Khoi Nguyen, Anh Tran, and Cuong Pham. SwiftEdit: Lightning Fast Text-Guided Image Editing via One-Step Diffu- sion. InICCV, 2025. 2, 3

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    GLIDE: Towards Pho- torealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text- Guided Diffusion Models

    Alex Nichol, Prafulla Dhariwal, Aditya Ramesh, Pranav Shyam, Pamela Mishkin, Bob McGrew, Ilya Sutskever, and Mark Chen. GLIDE: Towards Pho- torealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text- Guided Diffusion Models. InICML, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Blended Latent Diffusion.ACM TOG, 2023

    Dani Lischinski Omri Avrahami, Ohad Fried. Blended Latent Diffusion.ACM TOG, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Zero-shot Image-to-Image Translation

    Gaurav Parmar, Krishna Kumar Singh, Richard Zhang, Yijun Li, Jingwan Lu, and Jun-Yan Zhu. Zero-shot Image-to-Image Translation. InACM SIG- GRAPH 2023 Conference Proceedings, New York, NY , USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machin- ery. 2, 3, 5

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas M ¨uller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. SDXL: Improving Latent Dif- fusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023. 2, 3, 6, 12

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    DreamFusion: Text-to-3D using 2D Dif- fusion

    Ben Poole, Ajay Jain, Jonathan T Barron, and Ben Mildenhall. DreamFusion: Text-to-3D using 2D Dif- fusion. InICLR, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    FreeScale: Unleashing the Resolution of Diffu- sion Models via Tuning-Free Scale Fusion

    Haonan Qiu, Shiwei Zhang, Yujie Wei, Ruihang Chu, Hangjie Yuan, Xiang Wang, Yingya Zhang, and Ziwei Liu. FreeScale: Unleashing the Resolution of Diffu- sion Models via Tuning-Free Scale Fusion. InICCV,

    work page

  41. [41]

    Merging and Splitting Diffusion Paths for Semantically Coherent Panoramas

    Fabio Quattrini, Vittorio Pippi, Silvia Cascianelli, and Rita Cucchiara. Merging and Splitting Diffusion Paths for Semantically Coherent Panoramas. InECCV,

    work page

  42. [42]

    Learning Transferable Visual Models from Nat- ural Language Supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sas- try, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning Transferable Visual Models from Nat- ural Language Supervision. InICML, 2021. 4

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents

    Aditya Ramesh, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alex Nichol, Casey Chu, and Mark Chen. Hierarchical Text- Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125, 2022. 2, 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    UltraPixel: Advancing Ultra-High- Resolution Image Synthesis to New Peaks

    Jingjing Ren, Wenbo Li, Haoyu Chen, Renjing Pei, Bin Shao, Yong Guo, Long Peng, Fenglong Song, and Lei Zhu. UltraPixel: Advancing Ultra-High- Resolution Image Synthesis to New Peaks. In NeurIPS, 2024. 2, 3, 6

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    High- Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High- Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models. InCVPR, 2022. 2, 3, 6, 12

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Semantic Image Inversion and Editing using Rectified Stochastic Differential Equations

    Litu Rout, Yujia Chen, Nataniel Ruiz, Constantine Caramanis, Sanjay Shakkottai, and Wen-Sheng Chu. Semantic Image Inversion and Editing using Rectified Stochastic Differential Equations. InICLR, 2025. 2

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Sara Mahdavi, Rapha Gontijo Lopes, Tim Salimans, Jonathan Ho, David J Fleet, and Mohammad Norouzi

    Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Emily Denton, Seyed Kam- yar Seyed Ghasemipour, Burcu Karagol Ayan, S. Sara Mahdavi, Rapha Gontijo Lopes, Tim Salimans, Jonathan Ho, David J Fleet, and Mohammad Norouzi. Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding. InNeurIPS, 2022. 2, 3

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Ryan Shue, Eric Ryan Chan, Ryan Po, Zachary Ankner, Jiajun Wu, and Gordon Wetzstein

    J. Ryan Shue, Eric Ryan Chan, Ryan Po, Zachary Ankner, Jiajun Wu, and Gordon Wetzstein. 3D Neural Field Generation using Triplane Diffusion. InCVPR,

    work page

  49. [49]

    Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models. InICLR, 2021. 3, 5

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Invertible Consis- tency Distillation for Text-Guided Image Editing in Around 7 Steps

    Nikita Starodubcev, Mikhail Khoroshikh, Artem Babenko, and Dmitry Baranchuk. Invertible Consis- tency Distillation for Text-Guided Image Editing in Around 7 Steps. InNeurIPS, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Exploit- ing Diffusion Prior for Real-World Image Super- Resolution.International Journal of Computer Vision, pages 1–21, 2024

    Jianyi Wang, Zongsheng Yue, Shangchen Zhou, Kelvin CK Chan, and Chen Change Loy. Exploit- ing Diffusion Prior for Real-World Image Super- Resolution.International Journal of Computer Vision, pages 1–21, 2024. 7, 8, 13

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesis

    Xiaoshi Wu, Yiming Hao, Keqiang Sun, Yixiong Chen, Feng Zhu, Rui Zhao, and Hongsheng Li. Hu- man Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Syn- thesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09341, 2023. 7, 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    SANA: Efficient High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Linear Diffu- sion Transformers

    Enze Xie, Junsong Chen, Junyu Chen, Han Cai, Hao- tian Tang, Yujun Lin, Zhekai Zhang, Muyang Li, Ligeng Zhu, Yao Lu, and Song Han. SANA: Efficient High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Linear Diffu- sion Transformers. InICLR, 2025. 3

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Pref- erences for Text-to-Image Generation

    Jiazheng Xu, Xiao Liu, Yuchen Wu, Yuxuan Tong, Qinkai Li, Ming Ding, Jie Tang, and Yuxiao Dong. ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Pref- erences for Text-to-Image Generation. InNeurIPS,

    work page

  55. [55]

    Inversion-Free Image Editing with Natu- ral Language

    Sihan Xu, Yidong Huang, Jiayi Pan, Ziqiao Ma, and Joyce Chai. Inversion-Free Image Editing with Natu- ral Language. InCVPR, 2023. 7, 8, 13

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    ViT-B/32

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffu- sion Models. InICCV, 2023. 3 A. Implementation Details We provide additional implementation details of Alg. 2. To highlight the distinguishing factors between ScaleCrafter [18] and our proposed method, we present both reverse processes. The DDIM sampling steps ...

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    moon”→“earth

    ▷ Decode latent 13:returnx 0 B. Effect of Classfier-Guidance Scale We investigate the effect of small guidance scaleλ∈[0,1]in our sampling process. We examine the impact of varying the small guidance scale parameter,λ, within the range [0, 1] on our sampling process. As depicted in Fig. A7, the reconstruction produced withλ= 0does not exactly replicate th...

    work page arXiv