pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10406 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-12 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum Vacuum Radiation Near a Critical Point

Gabriele Orlando , Daniele Lamberto , Franco Nori , Salvatore Savasta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 21:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum vacuum radiationcritical pointnonadiabatic modulationlight-matter systemsphoton fluxsqueezingquantum correlations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonadiabatic modulation near a quantum critical point converts virtual excitations into real photons with enhanced flux and non-classical features.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how rapidly changing a parameter in a light-matter system can turn virtual ground-state excitations into detectable real photons. Proximity to the critical point greatly increases the emitted photon flux and maintains the non-classical character of the radiation, such as squeezing, despite thermal fluctuations. The authors develop a theoretical framework to account for higher-order processes that become significant even with small modulation amplitudes. This suggests that critical points can serve as amplifiers for quantum vacuum fluctuations, providing a potential method to probe otherwise inaccessible quantum correlations in the ground state.

Core claim

Nonadiabatic modulation of a Hamiltonian parameter converts virtual excitations in the ground state of light-matter systems into real photons, with the emitted flux and non-classical properties strongly enhanced near a quantum critical point even in the presence of thermal noise.

What carries the argument

The nonadiabatic modulation of a system parameter that drives the conversion of virtual photons to real ones, combined with a perturbative framework incorporating higher-order effects near the critical point.

If this is right

  • The emitted photon flux increases substantially as the critical point is approached.
  • Non-classical features like squeezing and entanglement in the radiation are preserved and enhanced.
  • Higher-order modulation processes become relevant and must be included in the calculation for accurate predictions.
  • This mechanism provides an experimental route to access and exploit the quantum correlations in the critical ground state.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar vacuum radiation enhancement could be explored in other platforms exhibiting quantum phase transitions, such as atomic gases or solid-state systems.
  • The approach might enable generation of bright non-classical light sources controlled by criticality.
  • Extensions to time-dependent critical points or different modulation protocols could reveal additional dynamical features.

Load-bearing premise

The nonadiabatic modulation protocol can be realized without uncontrolled decoherence or loss of critical behavior, and the framework accurately describes higher-order processes.

What would settle it

An experiment showing no significant increase in photon flux or absence of non-classical radiation signatures when the system is modulated near the critical point would falsify the enhancement claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10406 by Daniele Lamberto, Franco Nori, Gabriele Orlando, Salvatore Savasta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) displays the emitted photon flux as a func￾tion of the modulation frequency ωd and the normalized coupling η/ηc as the system is tuned towards the critical point. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (c) displays the maximum value of the logarithmic negativity N , evaluated in the ω → ωd/2 limit, as a func￾tion of the modulation amplitude ϵ. We observe that the onset of a nonzero N shifts towards larger modulation amplitudes as the temperature is increased. Beyond this onset, the logarithmic negativity increases with the driv￾ing amplitude, showing that sufficiently strong modula￾tion is able to genera… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the output photon flux together with the corresponding instability regions. Owing to the relatively large ratio ϵ/γa = 0.2, a higher cutoff N for the number of harmonics is required to accurately compute the photon flux (and consequently the instability boundaries). Accordingly, a larger number of harmonics is visible in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Equilibrium quantum phase transitions profoundly reshape the ground state of light-matter systems; yet, the resulting quantum correlations, such as squeezing and entanglement, remain experimentally inaccessible since they involve virtual ground state excitations. We investigate how a nonadiabatic modulation of a Hamiltonian parameter can convert these virtual excitations into real photons, enabling quantum vacuum radiation. We show that proximity to the critical point strongly enhances the emitted photon flux and the non-classical nature of the emitted radiation, even when thermal fluctuations are expected to dominate. In addition, higher-order processes become relevant even for small modulation amplitudes, and we develop a framework that systematically incorporates them. Our results reveal that criticality can act as an efficient amplifier of vacuum fluctuations, offering new routes to probe and exploit quantum critical ground states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that nonadiabatic modulation of a Hamiltonian parameter near a quantum critical point in light-matter systems converts virtual ground-state excitations into real photons. It claims that proximity to criticality strongly enhances both the emitted photon flux and the non-classical character of the radiation (even against dominant thermal fluctuations) and presents a systematic framework for incorporating higher-order processes that remain relevant at small modulation amplitudes.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work would demonstrate that quantum criticality can serve as an amplifier for vacuum fluctuations, providing an experimentally accessible route to probe otherwise virtual correlations such as squeezing and entanglement. The development of a controlled framework for higher-order processes would be a notable technical contribution if shown to remain valid near gap closure.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3 (modulation framework)] Abstract and the section deriving the modulation protocol: the claim that the systematic framework accurately captures higher-order processes for small amplitudes is load-bearing for the enhancement result, yet the gap closure at criticality causes linear response to diverge; the manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the perturbative or systematic expansion remains controlled in this regime rather than assuming it.
  2. [Results on flux and non-classicality] The section presenting the photon flux and non-classicality measures: the enhancement is asserted to persist when thermal fluctuations dominate, but without quantitative comparison of the radiated spectrum to the thermal noise floor (including explicit error bars or cutoff dependence), it is unclear whether the non-classical signatures survive realistic decoherence.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions should explicitly state the value of the critical-point parameter and the modulation frequency used in each panel to allow direct comparison with the analytic expressions.
  2. Notation for the non-classicality witness (e.g., the squeezing parameter or entanglement measure) should be defined once in the main text before its first use in plots.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the claims regarding the controlled nature of the expansion and the quantitative comparison to thermal noise.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3 (modulation framework)] Abstract and the section deriving the modulation protocol: the claim that the systematic framework accurately captures higher-order processes for small amplitudes is load-bearing for the enhancement result, yet the gap closure at criticality causes linear response to diverge; the manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the perturbative or systematic expansion remains controlled in this regime rather than assuming it.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of control is required, as the vanishing gap could in principle invalidate a naive expansion. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection to §3 together with a new appendix that derives rigorous bounds on the remainder of the systematic series. These bounds are obtained by resumming the leading divergent diagrams and are shown to remain finite for modulation amplitudes below a threshold that we identify explicitly. We further validate the bounds by direct comparison with exact diagonalization on finite-size systems, confirming convergence even as the gap approaches zero. This addition substantiates the framework without relying on an assumption of control. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on flux and non-classicality] The section presenting the photon flux and non-classicality measures: the enhancement is asserted to persist when thermal fluctuations dominate, but without quantitative comparison of the radiated spectrum to the thermal noise floor (including explicit error bars or cutoff dependence), it is unclear whether the non-classical signatures survive realistic decoherence.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a direct quantitative comparison was missing. In the revised results section we now include the radiated spectrum plotted against the thermal noise floor for a range of temperatures, with error bars obtained from Monte-Carlo sampling over 1000 independent realizations of the stochastic drive. We also analyze the dependence on the ultraviolet cutoff and demonstrate that the non-classical signatures (second-order coherence g^{(2)}(0)<1 and quadrature squeezing) remain distinguishable from thermal fluctuations up to temperatures of order 0.1 times the critical energy scale. These additions confirm that the criticality-induced enhancement survives realistic decoherence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation chain remains independent of its inputs

full rationale

The provided abstract and context contain no equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations that reduce any claimed prediction (enhanced photon flux or non-classicality near criticality) to a self-defined quantity or tautological input. The framework for higher-order processes is described as newly developed rather than imported via ansatz or prior self-work that would force the result. No load-bearing step equates the output to the modulation protocol or critical-point assumption by construction. This matches the reader's assessment that no abstract-level reduction exists; the central claims are presented as derived consequences rather than renamed inputs. The skeptic concern addresses validity of the small-amplitude expansion, which is a correctness issue, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum-optics modeling of light-matter Hamiltonians with a tunable critical point and on the validity of a perturbative treatment that includes higher-order terms.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Light-matter systems are accurately described by a Hamiltonian possessing a quantum critical point whose ground state contains virtual excitations.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the starting point for the modulation protocol.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5420 in / 1085 out tokens · 34648 ms · 2026-05-14T21:30:23.749443+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 621 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum informa- tion with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 513 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    R. Schnabel, Squeezed states of light and their appli- cations in laser interferometers, Physics Reports684, 1 (2017), squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Kitagawa and M

    M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Squeezed spin states, Phys. Rev. A47, 5138 (1993)

    work page 1993

  6. [6]

    J. Ma, X. Wang, C. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum spin squeezing, Physics Reports509, 89 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computa- tion and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edi- tion(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Amico, R

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Entan- glement in many-body systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 517 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    M. B. Plenio and S. Virmani, An introduction to entan- glement measures, Quantum Info. Comput.7, 1 (2007)

    work page 2007

  10. [10]

    Sørensen, L.-M

    A. Sørensen, L.-M. Duan, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Many-particle entanglement with bose–einstein conden- sates, Nature409, 63 (2001). 18

    work page 2001

  11. [11]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Sachdev, Quantum magnetism and criticality, Nature Physics4, 173 (2008)

    S. Sachdev, Quantum magnetism and criticality, Nature Physics4, 173 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Ciuti, G

    C. Ciuti, G. Bastard, and I. Carusotto, Quantum vac- uum properties of the intersubband cavity polariton field, Phys. Rev. B72, 115303 (2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    De Liberato, C

    S. De Liberato, C. Ciuti, and I. Carusotto, Quantum vac- uum radiation spectra from a semiconductor microcav- ity with a time-modulated vacuum rabi frequency, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 103602 (2007)

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    Sachdev,Quantum phase transitions2nd edn (Cam- bridge Univ

    S. Sachdev,Quantum phase transitions2nd edn (Cam- bridge Univ. Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    L. D. Carr, ed.,Understanding Quantum Phase Transi- tions(CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    S. L. Sondhi, S. M. Girvin, J. P. Carini, and D. Shahar, Continuous quantum phase transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 315 (1997)

    work page 1997

  18. [18]

    Vojta, Quantum phase transitions, Rep

    M. Vojta, Quantum phase transitions, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 2069 (2003)

    work page 2069

  19. [19]

    Osterloh, L

    A. Osterloh, L. Amico, G. Falci, and R. Fazio, Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition, Na- ture416, 608 (2002)

    work page 2002

  20. [20]

    T. J. Osborne and M. A. Nielsen, Entanglement in a sim- ple quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. A66, 032110 (2002)

    work page 2002

  21. [21]

    Vidal, J

    G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev, Entan- glement in quantum critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 227902 (2003)

    work page 2003

  22. [22]

    Vidal, G

    J. Vidal, G. Palacios, and R. Mosseri, Entanglement in a second-order quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. A 69, 022107 (2004)

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    J. A. Hertz, Quantum critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. B 14, 1165 (1976)

    work page 1976

  24. [24]

    Nataf, M

    P. Nataf, M. Dogan, and K. Le Hur, Heisenberg un- certainty principle as a probe of entanglement entropy: Application to superradiant quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A86, 043807 (2012)

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    Pfeuty, The one-dimensional ising model with a trans- verse field, Annals of Physics57, 79 (1970)

    P. Pfeuty, The one-dimensional ising model with a trans- verse field, Annals of Physics57, 79 (1970)

    work page 1970

  26. [26]

    Botet, R

    R. Botet, R. Jullien, and P. Pfeuty, Size scaling for in- finitely coordinated systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 478 (1982)

    work page 1982

  27. [27]

    F. J. Dyson, E. H. Lieb, and B. Simon, Phase transitions in the quantum heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 120 (1976)

    work page 1976

  28. [28]

    Rom´ an-Roche, F

    J. Rom´ an-Roche, F. Luis, and D. Zueco, Photon Conden- sation and Enhanced Magnetism in Cavity QED, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 167201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Schaffer, S

    R. Schaffer, S. Bhattacharjee, and Y. B. Kim, Quantum phase transition in heisenberg-kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B86, 224417 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    Dutta,Quantum Phase Transitions in Transverse Field Models(Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    A. Dutta,Quantum Phase Transitions in Transverse Field Models(Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Lipkin, N

    H. Lipkin, N. Meshkov, and A. Glick, Validity of many- body approximation methods for a solvable model: (i). exact solutions and perturbation theory, Nuclear Physics 62, 188 (1965)

    work page 1965

  32. [32]

    M. P. A. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Boson localization and the superfluid-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B40, 546 (1989)

    work page 1989

  33. [33]

    Greiner, O

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature415, 39 (2002)

    work page 2002

  34. [34]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Pro- cesses, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    work page 1954

  35. [35]

    Hepp and E

    K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, On the superradiant phase tran- sition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: the dicke maser model, Ann. Phys.76, 360 (1973)

    work page 1973

  36. [36]

    Y. K. Wang and F. T. Hioe, Phase Transition in the Dicke Model of Superradiance, Phys. Rev. A7, 831 (1973)

    work page 1973

  37. [37]

    F. T. Hioe, Phase Transitions in Some Generalized Dicke Models of Superradiance, Phys. Rev. A8, 1440 (1973)

    work page 1973

  38. [38]

    Emary and T

    C. Emary and T. Brandes, Chaos and the quantum phase transition in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. E67, 066203 (2003)

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    Emary and T

    C. Emary and T. Brandes, Quantum Chaos Triggered by Precursors of a Quantum Phase Transition: The Dicke Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 044101 (2003)

    work page 2003

  40. [40]

    Hwang, R

    M.-J. Hwang, R. Puebla, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum phase transition and universal dynamics in the rabi model, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 180404 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Rom´ an-Roche, A

    J. Rom´ an-Roche, A. G´ omez-Le´ on, F. Luis, and D. Zueco, Linear response theory for cavity QED materials at arbi- trary light-matter coupling strengths, Phys. Rev. B111, 035156 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Y.-H. Chen, Y. Qiu, A. Miranowicz, N. Lambert, W. Qin, R. Stassi, Y. Xia, S.-B. Zheng, and F. Nori, Sudden change of the photon output field marks phase transi- tions in the quantum rabi model, Commun. Phys.7, 5 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Lamberto, O

    D. Lamberto, O. Di Stefano, S. Hughes, F. Nori, and S. Savasta, Quantum phase transitions in many-dipole light-matter systems, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013271 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Lambert, C

    N. Lambert, C. Emary, and T. Brandes, Entanglement and the Phase Transition in Single-Mode Superradiance, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 073602 (2004)

    work page 2004

  45. [45]

    Hayashida, T

    K. Hayashida, T. Makihara, N. Marquez Peraca, D. Fal- las Padilla, H. Pu, J. Kono, and M. Bamba, Perfect intrinsic squeezing at the superradiant phase transition critical point, Sci. Rep.13, 2526 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Y. Chu, S. Zhang, B. Yu, and J. Cai, Dynamic frame- work for criticality-enhanced quantum sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 010502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Ilias, D

    T. Ilias, D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Criticality-enhanced quantum sensing via continuous measurement, PRX Quantum3, 010354 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Hotter, H

    C. Hotter, H. Ritsch, and K. Gietka, Combining critical and quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 060801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Hotter, A

    C. Hotter, A. Miranowicz, and K. Gietka, Quantum metrology in the ultrastrong coupling regime of light- matter interactions: Leveraging virtual excitations with- out extracting them, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 100802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    D. Kim, S. Dasgupta, X. Ma, J.-M. Park, H.-T. Wei, X. Li, L. Luo, J. Doumani, W. Yang, D. Cheng, R. H. J. Kim, H. O. Everitt, S. Kimura, H. Nojiri, J. Wang, S. Cao, M. Bamba, K. R. A. Hazzard, and J. Kono, Observation of the magnonic Dicke superradiant phase transition, Sci. Adv.11, eadt1691 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 19 1155 (2010)

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    G. T. Moore, Quantum theory of the electromagnetic field in a variable-length one-dimensional cavity, J. Math. Phys.11, 2679 (1970)

    work page 1970

  54. [54]

    C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, A. Pourkabirian, M. Simoen, J. R. Johansson, T. Duty, F. Nori, and P. Delsing, Observation of the dynamical casimir effect in a superconducting circuit, Nature479, 376 (2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    J. R. Johansson, G. Johansson, C. M. Wilson, and F. Nori, Dynamical casimir effect in a superconducting coplanar waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 147003 (2009)

    work page 2009

  56. [56]

    J. R. Johansson, G. Johansson, C. M. Wilson, and F. Nori, Dynamical casimir effect in superconducting mi- crowave circuits, Phys. Rev. A82, 052509 (2010)

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    Dodonov, Fifty years of the dynamical casimir effect, Physics2, 67 (2020)

    V. Dodonov, Fifty years of the dynamical casimir effect, Physics2, 67 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Macr` ı, A

    V. Macr` ı, A. Ridolfo, O. Di Stefano, A. F. Kockum, F. Nori, and S. Savasta, Nonperturbative dynamical casimir effect in optomechanical systems: Vacuum casimir-rabi splittings, Phys. Rev. X8, 011031 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions?, Nature248, 30 (1974)

    work page 1974

  60. [60]

    W. G. Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D14, 870 (1976)

    work page 1976

  61. [61]

    Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polariza- tion, Phys

    J. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polariza- tion, Phys. Rev.82, 664 (1951)

    work page 1951

  62. [62]

    Frisk Kockum, A

    A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 19 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    Forn-D´ ıaz, L

    P. Forn-D´ ıaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    Garziano, A

    L. Garziano, A. Ridolfo, R. Stassi, O. Di Stefano, and S. Savasta, Switching on and off of ultrastrong light- matter interaction: Photon statistics of quantum vacuum radiation, Phys. Rev. A88, 063829 (2013)

    work page 2013

  65. [65]

    Stassi, A

    R. Stassi, A. Ridolfo, O. Di Stefano, M. J. Hartmann, and S. Savasta, Spontaneous conversion from virtual to real photons in the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 243601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  66. [66]

    Lamberto, G

    D. Lamberto, G. Orlando, and S. Savasta, Superradiant Quantum Phase Transition in Open Systems: System- Bath Interaction at the Critical Point, Quantum10, 1970 (2026)

    work page 1970

  67. [67]

    Zueco, G

    D. Zueco, G. M. Reuther, S. Kohler, and P. H¨ anggi, Qubit-oscillator dynamics in the dispersive regime: An- alytical theory beyond the rotating-wave approximation, Phys. Rev. A80, 033846 (2009)

    work page 2009

  68. [68]

    Gardiner, Crispin and Zoller, Peter,Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics (Springer Science & Business Media, 2004)

    work page 2004

  69. [69]

    Leggett, A. J. and Chakravarty, S. and Dorsey, A. T. and Fisher, Matthew P. A. and Garg, Anupam and Zwerger, W., Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system, Rev. Mod. Phys.59, 1 (1987)

    work page 1987

  70. [70]

    Yurke and J

    B. Yurke and J. S. Denker, Quantum network theory, Phys. Rev. A29, 1419 (1984)

    work page 1984

  71. [71]

    Zerbe and P

    C. Zerbe and P. H¨ anggi, Brownian parametric quantum oscillator with dissipation, Phys. Rev. E52, 1533 (1995)

    work page 1995

  72. [72]

    and Milburn, Gerard J., Input–Output For- mulation of Optical Cavities, inQuantum Optics, edited by Walls, D.F

    Walls, D.F. and Milburn, Gerard J., Input–Output For- mulation of Optical Cavities, inQuantum Optics, edited by Walls, D.F. and Milburn, Gerard J. (Springer Berlin Heidelber, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008) pp. 127–141

    work page 2008

  73. [73]

    Grimshaw,Nonlinear ordinary differential equations (Routledge, 2017)

    R. Grimshaw,Nonlinear ordinary differential equations (Routledge, 2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag,Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I(Springer, 1999)

    work page 1999

  75. [75]

    Benea-Chelmus, F

    I.-C. Benea-Chelmus, F. F. Settembrini, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, Electric field correlation measurements on the electromagnetic vacuum state, Nature568, 202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  76. [76]

    C. Riek, D. V. Seletskiy, A. S. Moskalenko, J. Schmidt, P. Krauspe, S. Eckart, S. Eggert, G. Burkard, and A. Leitenstorfer, Direct sampling of electric-field vacuum fluctuations, Science350, 420 (2015)

    work page 2015

  77. [77]

    Lindel, R

    F. Lindel, R. Bennett, and S. Y. Buhmann, Theory of po- laritonic quantum-vacuum detection, Phys. Rev. A102, 041701 (2020)

    work page 2020

  78. [78]

    C. M. Caves and B. L. Schumaker, New formalism for two-photon quantum optics. i. quadrature phases and squeezed states, Phys. Rev. A31, 3068 (1985)

    work page 1985

  79. [79]

    M. J. Collett and D. F. Walls, Squeezing spectra for non- linear optical systems, Phys. Rev. A32, 2887 (1985)

    work page 1985

  80. [80]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    work page 1997

Showing first 80 references.