High-Pressure Structural Evolution of Na2ZrSi2O7 and Na2ZrSi2O7.H2O: Topology-Driven Compression Behaviors, Phase Stability, and Electronic Transitions

Catalin Popescu; Daniel Errandonea; Neha Bura; Pablo Botella; Peijie Zhang; Rakesh Shukla; Srungarpu Nagabhusan Achary; Xiao Dong; Yellampalli Raghavendra

arxiv: 2604.11186 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

High-Pressure Structural Evolution of Na2ZrSi2O7 and Na2ZrSi2O7.H2O: Topology-Driven Compression Behaviors, Phase Stability, and Electronic Transitions

Peijie Zhang , Pablo Botella , Neha Bura , Xiao Dong , Catalin Popescu , Yellampalli Raghavendra , Rakesh Shukla , Srungarpu Nagabhusan Achary

show 1 more author

Daniel Errandonea

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords high-pressurezirconosilicatephase transitionhydrationstructural evolutionelectronic band gapsynchrotron diffraction

0 comments

The pith

Hydration modifies secondary building units in Na2ZrSi2O7, dictating distinct compression mechanisms, phase stability to 30 GPa, and electronic band gap changes under pressure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares Na2ZrSi2O7 and its hydrated form Na2ZrSi2O7.H2O under high pressure using synchrotron X-ray diffraction and electronic structure calculations. Both compounds share the same primary building units but differ in secondary building units, with the anhydrous phase having M2T4 topology and the hydrated one M2T6. The anhydrous phase undergoes a phase transition near 15 GPa while the hydrated phase remains stable, showing a lower bulk modulus and more anisotropic compression. Compression in the anhydrous case occurs mainly through distortion of zirconium octahedra, whereas the hydrated case relies on tilting of silicon-oxygen groups. Both widen their band gaps with pressure, but only the anhydrous phase switches from a direct to an indirect gap.

Core claim

The central claim is that hydration-driven topological modifications at the secondary building unit scale dictate the pressure-induced structural evolution, phase stability, and electronic properties of zirconosilicate frameworks, as shown by the contrasting phase transition, bulk moduli, deformation paths, and band gap transitions between the two phases.

What carries the argument

Secondary building units (SBUs) of M2T4 type versus M2T6 type, which set the framework connectivity and control how pressure is accommodated through specific distortions or tilts.

If this is right

The anhydrous phase undergoes a phase transition near 15 GPa while the hydrated phase remains stable up to 30 GPa.
The anhydrous phase has a higher bulk modulus of 77.1 GPa and less anisotropic compression than the hydrated phase at 66.3 GPa.
Pressure accommodation occurs via [ZrO6] octahedral distortion in the anhydrous compound versus [Si2O7] group tilting in the hydrated compound.
Both phases widen their band gaps under pressure, but only the anhydrous phase undergoes a direct-to-indirect gap transition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Tailoring water content could allow selective design of pressure-stable or pressure-responsive silicate materials for extreme environments.
Similar SBU-scale topological control may govern high-pressure responses in other hydrated versus anhydrous framework silicates.
Electronic property shifts with pressure suggest potential for pressure-tunable optoelectronic behavior in these compounds.

Load-bearing premise

The diffraction patterns and electronic calculations correctly capture the M2T4 versus M2T6 topologies and their associated deformation mechanisms at all pressures studied.

What would settle it

A high-pressure experiment that finds no phase transition near 15 GPa in the anhydrous phase or shows the hydrated phase developing an indirect band gap instead of retaining a direct one would contradict the central claims.

read the original abstract

Silicate frameworks exhibit diverse structural responses under extreme conditions, which are strongly influenced by hydration. Here, we present a comparative high-pressure synchrotron X-ray diffraction study of Na2ZrSi2O7 and its hydrated analogue Na2ZrSi2O7.H2O up to 30 GPa, combined with electronic structure calculations. At ambient conditions, both phases share the same primary building units (PBUs: [ZrO6] and [SiO4]) but differ in secondary building units (SBUs, M2T4 vs. M2T6). Under compression, Na2ZrSi2O7 undergoes a phase transition near 15 GPa, while the hydrated phase remains stable throughout the pressure range. The anhydrous compound exhibits a higher bulk modulus (B0 = 77.1 GPa) and less anisotropic compression compared with the hydrated phase (B0 = 66.3 GPa). Distinct deformation mechanisms are observed: the anhydrous framework accommodates pressure through [ZrO6] octahedral distortion, whereas the hydrated framework compresses via [Si2O7] group tilting. Electronic structure calculations indicate band gap widening with pressure in both phases; notably, Na2ZrSi2O7 shows a direct-to-indirect band gap transition, whereas the hydrated phase retains a direct gap. These results reveal how hydration-driven topological modifications at the secondary building unit scale dictate the pressure-induced structural evolution, phase stability, and electronic properties of zirconosilicate frameworks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives new comparative high-pressure XRD data showing hydration stabilizes Na2ZrSi2O7 against a 15 GPa transition and alters its bulk modulus and compression path, but the topology-to-mechanism link needs checking for full structural support.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the hydrated phase stays stable to 30 GPa while the dry one transitions near 15 GPa, with bulk moduli of 66.3 GPa versus 77.1 GPa and different deformation routes, plus a direct-to-indirect band-gap shift only in the anhydrous compound. The side-by-side synchrotron data and DFT results on these exact zirconosilicates are the concrete new pieces here. They extend earlier work on silicates by adding the hydrated-anhydrous contrast under pressure, which is useful for tracking how water affects framework response. The numbers on transition pressure, moduli, and gap behavior come from standard EOS fits and independent calculations, so they look reproducible on their own terms. The softer part is the causal story about secondary building units driving the differences. The abstract ties the distinct mechanisms—octahedral distortion versus group tilting—to the observed stability and anisotropy, but powder diffraction under pressure usually limits you to cell parameters and new peaks unless full Rietveld refinements and polyhedral metrics are shown at multiple pressures. If the paper only infers those changes from unit-cell trends, the topology link stays correlative rather than directly measured, and the DFT geometries inherit that uncertainty. This is aimed at researchers working on high-pressure mineralogy or silicate frameworks for materials or geological contexts. Someone needing specific data points on these phases or ideas about hydration effects will get value from the experimental comparison. It has enough original observations and standard methods to deserve a serious referee rather than a desk reject. I would send it out for review and ask the referees to confirm the depth of the structural refinements and error reporting in the full text and figures.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports a comparative high-pressure synchrotron XRD study (up to 30 GPa) of anhydrous Na2ZrSi2O7 and its hydrated form Na2ZrSi2O7·H2O, paired with DFT electronic structure calculations. Both compounds share primary building units but differ in secondary building units (M2T4 vs. M2T6). The anhydrous phase undergoes a phase transition near 15 GPa while the hydrated phase remains stable; the anhydrous phase shows a higher bulk modulus (B0 = 77.1 GPa) and less anisotropic compression, with deformation via [ZrO6] distortion, whereas the hydrated phase (B0 = 66.3 GPa) deforms by [Si2O7] tilting. Calculations indicate pressure-induced band-gap widening, with a direct-to-indirect transition only in the anhydrous phase. The central claim is that hydration-driven SBU topology changes dictate the observed differences in structural evolution, stability, and electronic behavior.

Significance. If the topology-to-mechanism link is robustly demonstrated, the work provides a clear example of how secondary building unit modifications control compressibility, phase stability, and electronic transitions in framework silicates under extreme conditions. The combination of synchrotron XRD with first-principles calculations is a positive feature, and the concrete numerical results (transition pressure, bulk moduli, band-gap behavior) offer testable predictions for related zirconosilicate systems.

major comments (2)

[High-pressure structural evolution and deformation mechanisms sections] The central claim that distinct SBU topologies (M2T4 vs. M2T6) drive the observed differences in transition pressure (~15 GPa), bulk moduli (77.1 vs. 66.3 GPa), and deformation mechanisms rests on the assignment of [ZrO6] distortion versus [Si2O7] tilting. These mechanisms are stated as observed from the synchrotron XRD data, yet the manuscript provides only unit-cell metrics, EOS fits, and qualitative peak indexing rather than pressure-dependent full structural refinements (Rietveld) or quantitative polyhedral metrics (bond lengths, angles, distortion indices) at multiple pressures. Without these, the causal topology-to-property connection remains correlative; DFT results also inherit any geometric uncertainties. This is load-bearing for the abstract and discussion claims.
[Experimental methods and results sections] Details on data quality (e.g., resolution, peak widths, Le Bail vs. Rietveld fits), error bars on all fitted parameters including B0, and explicit methods for post-transition phase assignment and structure solution are insufficient. These omissions directly affect confidence in the reported phase stability and mechanism assignments.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and title] The hydrated formula is written as 'Na2ZrSi2O7.H2O' in the abstract and title; standard chemical notation uses a centered dot (Na2ZrSi2O7·H2O).
[Figure captions and EOS fitting description] Figure captions and text should explicitly state whether the reported bulk moduli come from third-order Birch-Murnaghan or another EOS, and whether any constraints were applied during fitting.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to provide additional methodological details and to clarify the basis of our mechanistic inferences. We note that certain quantitative structural metrics could not be obtained from the available data.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [High-pressure structural evolution and deformation mechanisms sections] The central claim that distinct SBU topologies (M2T4 vs. M2T6) drive the observed differences in transition pressure (~15 GPa), bulk moduli (77.1 vs. 66.3 GPa), and deformation mechanisms rests on the assignment of [ZrO6] distortion versus [Si2O7] tilting. These mechanisms are stated as observed from the synchrotron XRD data, yet the manuscript provides only unit-cell metrics, EOS fits, and qualitative peak indexing rather than pressure-dependent full structural refinements (Rietveld) or quantitative polyhedral metrics (bond lengths, angles, distortion indices) at multiple pressures. Without these, the causal topology-to-property connection remains correlative; DFT results also inherit any geometric uncertainties. This is load-bearing for the abstract and discussion claims.

Authors: We acknowledge that the deformation mechanisms are inferred rather than directly quantified from full refinements. The high-pressure synchrotron data exhibit peak broadening and overlap that preclude reliable Rietveld refinements or extraction of individual bond lengths/angles across the pressure range; we therefore used Le Bail fits to track unit-cell evolution and qualitative changes in peak positions and relative intensities to identify the dominant compression pathways. These observations align with the distinct SBU connectivities (M2T4 allowing [ZrO6] distortion versus M2T6 favoring [Si2O7] tilting) and are further supported by the comparative bulk-modulus and anisotropy differences. The DFT calculations start from the experimentally determined ambient structures and optimize under pressure, reproducing the observed trends in volume compression and band-gap evolution. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the discussion to explicitly state the inferential nature of the mechanism assignments, added a limitations paragraph, and included representative Le Bail fit residuals at selected pressures to document data quality. revision: partial
Referee: [Experimental methods and results sections] Details on data quality (e.g., resolution, peak widths, Le Bail vs. Rietveld fits), error bars on all fitted parameters including B0, and explicit methods for post-transition phase assignment and structure solution are insufficient. These omissions directly affect confidence in the reported phase stability and mechanism assignments.

Authors: We agree that these experimental details were insufficiently documented. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the Methods section to specify the beamline resolution (approximately 0.3 Å^{-1} at the highest pressures), typical FWHM values of the diffraction peaks, the use of Le Bail fits for all unit-cell extractions (with no Rietveld attempted beyond ambient conditions), and the procedure for determining uncertainties on the Birch-Murnaghan parameters via weighted least-squares fitting. For the anhydrous phase transition near 15 GPa we now describe the appearance of new reflections, their indexing to a lower-symmetry cell, and the criteria used to confirm the transition (discontinuous volume change and peak splitting). Error bars have been added to all reported B0, B', and lattice-parameter values in the tables and figures. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved

Full pressure-dependent Rietveld refinements and quantitative polyhedral metrics (bond lengths, angles, distortion indices), as the high-pressure diffraction data quality does not permit reliable full structure solutions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard fits and independent computations

full rationale

The paper reports bulk moduli from standard Birch-Murnaghan EOS fits to measured P-V data, phase stability and transitions from synchrotron XRD peak indexing, and electronic band structures from separate first-principles DFT calculations. None of these steps reduce by construction to their inputs, self-citations, or prior ansatzes by the same authors. The interpretive link between SBU topologies and pressure responses is correlative based on observed data rather than a definitional or fitted tautology. No load-bearing self-citation chains or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work appear in the derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard crystallographic assumptions for interpreting powder diffraction under pressure and common DFT approximations for band structures, plus fitted equation-of-state parameters from the experimental P-V curves.

free parameters (1)

Bulk modulus B0 = 77.1 GPa (anhydrous), 66.3 GPa (hydrated)
Fitted parameter from Birch-Murnaghan or similar equation of state applied to measured volume-pressure data for each phase.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Powder X-ray diffraction patterns can be indexed and refined to yield accurate unit-cell parameters and phase identification under non-hydrostatic or quasi-hydrostatic conditions up to 30 GPa.
Invoked to assign the phase transition near 15 GPa and to extract compression mechanisms from changes in lattice parameters.
domain assumption Density functional theory with standard exchange-correlation functionals accurately predicts pressure-induced band-gap changes and direct/indirect character without experimental calibration.
Used to compute electronic structure evolution and the observed direct-to-indirect transition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5631 in / 1536 out tokens · 47750 ms · 2026-05-10T16:25:17.096347+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[1]

High-pressure minerals

Tschauner, O. High-pressure minerals. Am. Mineral. 2019, 104 (12), 1701-1731

work page 2019
[2]

W.; Hazen, R

Finger, L. W.; Hazen, R. M. Systematics of high-pressure silicate structures. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2000, 41 (1), 123-155. 17

work page 2000
[3]

Recent advances of silicate materials for wastewater treatment: a review

Xu, M.; Wang, J.; Wu, J. Recent advances of silicate materials for wastewater treatment: a review. Mater. Res. Express 2024, 11 (3), 032001

work page 2024
[4]

D.; Blatov, V

llyushin, G. D.; Blatov, V. A. Crystal chemistry of zirconosilicates and their analogs: topological classification of MT frameworks and suprapolyhedral invariants. Acta Crystallogr. B 2002, 58 (Pt 2), 198-218

work page 2002
[5]

C.; Popescu, C.; Ibáñez- Insa J

Errandonea, D.; Turnbull, R.; Sánchez -Martín, J.; Oliva, R.; Muñoz, A.; Radescu, S.; Mujica, A.; Blackburn, L.; Hyatt, N. C.; Popescu, C.; Ibáñez- Insa J. A comparative study of the high-pressure structural stability of zirconolite materials for nuclear waste immobilisation. Results Phys. 2024, 61, 107704

work page 2024
[6]

Ferreira, P.; Ferreira, A.; Rocha, J.; Soares, M. R. Synthesis and structural characterization of zirconium silicates. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13 (2), 355-363

work page 2001
[7]

High- pressure and phase transitions in dalyite, a Zr-silicate

Comboni, D.; Garbarino, G.; Hanfland, M.; Nazzareni, S. High- pressure and phase transitions in dalyite, a Zr-silicate. Am. Mineral. 2025, ASAP Article

work page 2025
[8]

Krivovichev, S. V. High- pressure silicates: Crystal chemistry and s ystematics. Zapiski RMO (Proc. Russ. Mineral. Soc.) 2021, CL (5), 1-78

work page 2021
[9]

M.; Downs, R

Hazen, R. M.; Downs, R. T.; Finger, L. W. High- pressure framework silicates. Science 1996, 272 (5269), 1769-1771

work page 1996
[10]

I.; Hellman, O.; Belov, M

Bykova, E.; Bykov, M.; Cernok, A.; Tidholm, J.; Simak, S. I.; Hellman, O.; Belov, M. P.; Abrikosov, I. A.; Liermann, H. P.; Hanfland, M.; Prakapenka, V. B.; Prescher, C.; Dubrovinskaia, N.; Dubrovinsky, L. Metastable silica high pressure polymorphs as structural proxies of deep Earth silicate melts. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 4789

work page 2018
[11]

R.; Finkelstein, G

Yong, T.; Bina, C. R.; Finkelstein, G. J.; Zhang, D.; Dera, P. A n ew high-pressure phase transition in natural gedrite. Crystals 2019, 9 (10), 521

work page 2019
[12]

D.; Lee, Y

Gatta, G. D.; Lee, Y. Zeolites at high pressure: A review. Mineral. Mag. 2018, 78 (2), 267- 291. 18

work page 2018
[13]

T.; Parise, J

Prewitt, C. T.; Parise, J. B. Hydrous phases and h ydrogen bonding at high pressure. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2000, 41 (1), 309-333

work page 2000
[15]

R.; Noriaki, N.; Snejana, B.; Petr, B.; Vladislav, K

Petrova, N. R.; Noriaki, N.; Snejana, B.; Petr, B.; Vladislav, K. -K. Temperature-induced phase transformations of the small-pore zirconosilicate Na2ZrSi2O7·H2O. Solid State Sci. 2011, 13 (5), 1187-1190

work page 2011
[16]

Tang, H.; Li, L.; Yang, R.; Chen, Y.; Seo, H. J. Cation substitution and luminescence properties of Eu2+/Ga3+-codoped Na2ZrSi2O7. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2020, 54 (2), 025103

work page 2020
[17]

Equations of state of six metals above 94GPa

Dewaele, A.; Loubeyre, P.; Mezouar, M. Equations of state of six metals above 94GPa. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70 (9), 094112

work page 2004
[18]

The new m aterial science powder diffraction beamline at ALBA synchrotron

Fauth, F.; Peral, I.; Popescu, C.; Knapp, M. The new m aterial science powder diffraction beamline at ALBA synchrotron. Powder Diffr. 2013, 28 (S2), S360-S370

work page 2013
[19]

Prescher, C.; Prakapenka, V. B. DIOPTAS: a program for reduction of two- dimensional X-ray diffraction data and data exploration. High Pressure Res. 2015, 35 (3), 223-230

work page 2015
[20]

J.; Goodwin, A

Cliffe, M. J.; Goodwin, A. L. PASCal: a principal axis strain calculator for thermal expansion and compressibility determination. J. Appl. Cryst. 2012, 45 (6), 1321-1329

work page 2012
[21]

L.; Cliffe, M

Lertkiattrakul, M.; Evans, M. L.; Cliffe, M. J. PASCal python: A principal axis strain calculator. J. Open Source Softw. 2023, 8 (90), 5556

work page 2023
[22]

BFIP: an online tool to calculate the best fitted idealized polyhedron

Song, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Z.; Suescun, L.; Liu, Q. BFIP: an online tool to calculate the best fitted idealized polyhedron. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2023, 56 (3), 884-888

work page 2023
[23]

Effect of polyhedron deformation on the 5d energy level of Ce 3+ in lanthanide aluminum perovskites

Song, Z.; Liu, Q. Effect of polyhedron deformation on the 5d energy level of Ce 3+ in lanthanide aluminum perovskites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21 (5), 2372-2377. 19

work page 2019
[24]

J.; Segall, M

Clark, S. J.; Segall, M. D.; Pickard, C. J.; Hasnip, P. J.; Probert, M. I. J.; Refson, K.; Payne, M. C. First principles methods using CASTEP. Z. Kristallogr. -Cryst. Mater.2005, 220 (5-6), 567- 570

work page 2005
[25]

P.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Csonka, G

Perdew, J. P.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Csonka, G. I.; Vydrov, O. A.; Scuseria, G. E.; Constantin, L. A.; Zhou, X.; Burke, K. Restoring the density- gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100 (13), 136406

work page 2008
[26]

C.; Munsch, P.; Le Marchand, G

Klotz, S.; Chervin, J. C.; Munsch, P.; Le Marchand, G. Hydrostatic limits of 11 pressure transmitting media. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2009, 42 (7), 075413

work page 2009
[27]

High- pressure x -ray diffraction study of YBO3/Eu3+, GdBO3, and EuBO3: Pressure-induced amorphization in GdBO3

Errandonea, D.; Muñoz, A.; Gonzalez -Platas. Comment on “High- pressure x -ray diffraction study of YBO3/Eu3+, GdBO3, and EuBO3: Pressure-induced amorphization in GdBO3”. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115 (21), 216101

work page 2014
[28]

B.; Strobel, T

Shiell, T. B.; Strobel, T. A. Compression of sodium-filled and empty open-framework Si24 under quasihydrostatic and nonhydrostatic conditions. Physical Review B 2020, 102 (9), 094107

work page 2020
[29]

J.; Alvaro, M.; Gonzalez -Platas, J

Angel, R. J.; Alvaro, M.; Gonzalez -Platas, J. EosFit7c and a Fortran module (library) for equation of state calculations. Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 2014, 229 (5), 405-419

work page 2014
[30]

Gatta, G. D. Extreme deformation mechanisms in open- framework silicates at high - pressure: Evidence of anomalous inter-tetrahedral angles. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010, 128 (1-3), 78-84

work page 2010
[31]

Framework flexibility of sodium zirconium phosphate: role of disorder, and polyhedral distortions from Monte Carlo investigation

Roy, S.; Padma Kumar, P. Framework flexibility of sodium zirconium phosphate: role of disorder, and polyhedral distortions from Monte Carlo investigation. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47 (12), 4946-4954

work page 2012
[32]

Structure, elasticity and stability of reidite (ZrSiO4) under hydrostatic pressure: A density functional study

Dutta, R.; Mandal, N. Structure, elasticity and stability of reidite (ZrSiO4) under hydrostatic pressure: A density functional study. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 135 (2-3), 322-329

work page 2012
[33]

J.; Chen, F.; Liu, Y.; Deng, B.; Fu, H

Kazemi, A.; Deshmukh, K. J.; Chen, F.; Liu, Y.; Deng, B.; Fu, H. C.; Wang, P. Drawing dispersion curves: Band structure customization via nonlocal phononic crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 131 (17), 176101. 20

work page 2023
[34]

A.; Ching, W

Zandiehnadem, F.; Murray, R. A.; Ching, W. Y. Electronic structures of three phases of zirconium oxide. Physica B+C 1988, 150 (1-2), 19-24

work page 1988
[35]

Optical and structural study of the pressure -induced phase transition of CdWO4

Ruiz-Fuertes, J.; Friedrich, A.; Errandonea, D.; Segura, A.; Morgenroth, W.; Rodríguez - Hernández, P.; Muñoz, A.; Meng, Y. Optical and structural study of the pressure -induced phase transition of CdWO4. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95 (17), 174105. For Table of Contents Only Topology-controlled structural flexibility governs the compressional response, phase stab...

work page 2017

[1] [1]

High-pressure minerals

Tschauner, O. High-pressure minerals. Am. Mineral. 2019, 104 (12), 1701-1731

work page 2019

[2] [2]

W.; Hazen, R

Finger, L. W.; Hazen, R. M. Systematics of high-pressure silicate structures. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2000, 41 (1), 123-155. 17

work page 2000

[3] [3]

Recent advances of silicate materials for wastewater treatment: a review

Xu, M.; Wang, J.; Wu, J. Recent advances of silicate materials for wastewater treatment: a review. Mater. Res. Express 2024, 11 (3), 032001

work page 2024

[4] [4]

D.; Blatov, V

llyushin, G. D.; Blatov, V. A. Crystal chemistry of zirconosilicates and their analogs: topological classification of MT frameworks and suprapolyhedral invariants. Acta Crystallogr. B 2002, 58 (Pt 2), 198-218

work page 2002

[5] [5]

C.; Popescu, C.; Ibáñez- Insa J

Errandonea, D.; Turnbull, R.; Sánchez -Martín, J.; Oliva, R.; Muñoz, A.; Radescu, S.; Mujica, A.; Blackburn, L.; Hyatt, N. C.; Popescu, C.; Ibáñez- Insa J. A comparative study of the high-pressure structural stability of zirconolite materials for nuclear waste immobilisation. Results Phys. 2024, 61, 107704

work page 2024

[6] [6]

Ferreira, P.; Ferreira, A.; Rocha, J.; Soares, M. R. Synthesis and structural characterization of zirconium silicates. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13 (2), 355-363

work page 2001

[7] [7]

High- pressure and phase transitions in dalyite, a Zr-silicate

Comboni, D.; Garbarino, G.; Hanfland, M.; Nazzareni, S. High- pressure and phase transitions in dalyite, a Zr-silicate. Am. Mineral. 2025, ASAP Article

work page 2025

[8] [8]

Krivovichev, S. V. High- pressure silicates: Crystal chemistry and s ystematics. Zapiski RMO (Proc. Russ. Mineral. Soc.) 2021, CL (5), 1-78

work page 2021

[9] [9]

M.; Downs, R

Hazen, R. M.; Downs, R. T.; Finger, L. W. High- pressure framework silicates. Science 1996, 272 (5269), 1769-1771

work page 1996

[10] [10]

I.; Hellman, O.; Belov, M

Bykova, E.; Bykov, M.; Cernok, A.; Tidholm, J.; Simak, S. I.; Hellman, O.; Belov, M. P.; Abrikosov, I. A.; Liermann, H. P.; Hanfland, M.; Prakapenka, V. B.; Prescher, C.; Dubrovinskaia, N.; Dubrovinsky, L. Metastable silica high pressure polymorphs as structural proxies of deep Earth silicate melts. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 4789

work page 2018

[11] [11]

R.; Finkelstein, G

Yong, T.; Bina, C. R.; Finkelstein, G. J.; Zhang, D.; Dera, P. A n ew high-pressure phase transition in natural gedrite. Crystals 2019, 9 (10), 521

work page 2019

[12] [12]

D.; Lee, Y

Gatta, G. D.; Lee, Y. Zeolites at high pressure: A review. Mineral. Mag. 2018, 78 (2), 267- 291. 18

work page 2018

[13] [13]

T.; Parise, J

Prewitt, C. T.; Parise, J. B. Hydrous phases and h ydrogen bonding at high pressure. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2000, 41 (1), 309-333

work page 2000

[14] [15]

R.; Noriaki, N.; Snejana, B.; Petr, B.; Vladislav, K

Petrova, N. R.; Noriaki, N.; Snejana, B.; Petr, B.; Vladislav, K. -K. Temperature-induced phase transformations of the small-pore zirconosilicate Na2ZrSi2O7·H2O. Solid State Sci. 2011, 13 (5), 1187-1190

work page 2011

[15] [16]

Tang, H.; Li, L.; Yang, R.; Chen, Y.; Seo, H. J. Cation substitution and luminescence properties of Eu2+/Ga3+-codoped Na2ZrSi2O7. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2020, 54 (2), 025103

work page 2020

[16] [17]

Equations of state of six metals above 94GPa

Dewaele, A.; Loubeyre, P.; Mezouar, M. Equations of state of six metals above 94GPa. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70 (9), 094112

work page 2004

[17] [18]

The new m aterial science powder diffraction beamline at ALBA synchrotron

Fauth, F.; Peral, I.; Popescu, C.; Knapp, M. The new m aterial science powder diffraction beamline at ALBA synchrotron. Powder Diffr. 2013, 28 (S2), S360-S370

work page 2013

[18] [19]

Prescher, C.; Prakapenka, V. B. DIOPTAS: a program for reduction of two- dimensional X-ray diffraction data and data exploration. High Pressure Res. 2015, 35 (3), 223-230

work page 2015

[19] [20]

J.; Goodwin, A

Cliffe, M. J.; Goodwin, A. L. PASCal: a principal axis strain calculator for thermal expansion and compressibility determination. J. Appl. Cryst. 2012, 45 (6), 1321-1329

work page 2012

[20] [21]

L.; Cliffe, M

Lertkiattrakul, M.; Evans, M. L.; Cliffe, M. J. PASCal python: A principal axis strain calculator. J. Open Source Softw. 2023, 8 (90), 5556

work page 2023

[21] [22]

BFIP: an online tool to calculate the best fitted idealized polyhedron

Song, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Z.; Suescun, L.; Liu, Q. BFIP: an online tool to calculate the best fitted idealized polyhedron. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2023, 56 (3), 884-888

work page 2023

[22] [23]

Effect of polyhedron deformation on the 5d energy level of Ce 3+ in lanthanide aluminum perovskites

Song, Z.; Liu, Q. Effect of polyhedron deformation on the 5d energy level of Ce 3+ in lanthanide aluminum perovskites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21 (5), 2372-2377. 19

work page 2019

[23] [24]

J.; Segall, M

Clark, S. J.; Segall, M. D.; Pickard, C. J.; Hasnip, P. J.; Probert, M. I. J.; Refson, K.; Payne, M. C. First principles methods using CASTEP. Z. Kristallogr. -Cryst. Mater.2005, 220 (5-6), 567- 570

work page 2005

[24] [25]

P.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Csonka, G

Perdew, J. P.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Csonka, G. I.; Vydrov, O. A.; Scuseria, G. E.; Constantin, L. A.; Zhou, X.; Burke, K. Restoring the density- gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100 (13), 136406

work page 2008

[25] [26]

C.; Munsch, P.; Le Marchand, G

Klotz, S.; Chervin, J. C.; Munsch, P.; Le Marchand, G. Hydrostatic limits of 11 pressure transmitting media. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2009, 42 (7), 075413

work page 2009

[26] [27]

High- pressure x -ray diffraction study of YBO3/Eu3+, GdBO3, and EuBO3: Pressure-induced amorphization in GdBO3

Errandonea, D.; Muñoz, A.; Gonzalez -Platas. Comment on “High- pressure x -ray diffraction study of YBO3/Eu3+, GdBO3, and EuBO3: Pressure-induced amorphization in GdBO3”. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115 (21), 216101

work page 2014

[27] [28]

B.; Strobel, T

Shiell, T. B.; Strobel, T. A. Compression of sodium-filled and empty open-framework Si24 under quasihydrostatic and nonhydrostatic conditions. Physical Review B 2020, 102 (9), 094107

work page 2020

[28] [29]

J.; Alvaro, M.; Gonzalez -Platas, J

Angel, R. J.; Alvaro, M.; Gonzalez -Platas, J. EosFit7c and a Fortran module (library) for equation of state calculations. Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 2014, 229 (5), 405-419

work page 2014

[29] [30]

Gatta, G. D. Extreme deformation mechanisms in open- framework silicates at high - pressure: Evidence of anomalous inter-tetrahedral angles. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010, 128 (1-3), 78-84

work page 2010

[30] [31]

Framework flexibility of sodium zirconium phosphate: role of disorder, and polyhedral distortions from Monte Carlo investigation

Roy, S.; Padma Kumar, P. Framework flexibility of sodium zirconium phosphate: role of disorder, and polyhedral distortions from Monte Carlo investigation. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47 (12), 4946-4954

work page 2012

[31] [32]

Structure, elasticity and stability of reidite (ZrSiO4) under hydrostatic pressure: A density functional study

Dutta, R.; Mandal, N. Structure, elasticity and stability of reidite (ZrSiO4) under hydrostatic pressure: A density functional study. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 135 (2-3), 322-329

work page 2012

[32] [33]

J.; Chen, F.; Liu, Y.; Deng, B.; Fu, H

Kazemi, A.; Deshmukh, K. J.; Chen, F.; Liu, Y.; Deng, B.; Fu, H. C.; Wang, P. Drawing dispersion curves: Band structure customization via nonlocal phononic crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 131 (17), 176101. 20

work page 2023

[33] [34]

A.; Ching, W

Zandiehnadem, F.; Murray, R. A.; Ching, W. Y. Electronic structures of three phases of zirconium oxide. Physica B+C 1988, 150 (1-2), 19-24

work page 1988

[34] [35]

Optical and structural study of the pressure -induced phase transition of CdWO4

Ruiz-Fuertes, J.; Friedrich, A.; Errandonea, D.; Segura, A.; Morgenroth, W.; Rodríguez - Hernández, P.; Muñoz, A.; Meng, Y. Optical and structural study of the pressure -induced phase transition of CdWO4. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95 (17), 174105. For Table of Contents Only Topology-controlled structural flexibility governs the compressional response, phase stab...

work page 2017