pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12338 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🪐 quant-ph

Entanglement concentration of high-dimensional unknown partially entangled state

Si-Qi Du , Guo-Zhu Song , Hai-Rui Wei This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords entanglement concentrationhigh-dimensional quantum systemscross-Kerr nonlinearityBell statesunknown parametersqutritquantum communicationlinear optics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single-site scheme using cross-Kerr nonlinearities distills two-qutrit maximally entangled Bell states from unknown-parameter high-dimensional partial entanglement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a universal entanglement concentration protocol for nonlocal high-dimensional generalized Bell states whose parameters are unknown. By applying cross-Kerr nonlinearities, X-quadrature homodyne measurements, and single-partite projection measurements exclusively at one party's location, the scheme produces a two-qutrit maximally entangled state. This extends prior work that focused mainly on qubit systems or states with known parameters. The protocol also yields partially entangled qubit states as by-products that can serve other quantum tasks, and implements the required single-qutrit projections via linear optical elements.

Core claim

We propose a universal scheme to concentrate nonlocal high-dimensional generalized Bell states with unknown parameters. After the cross-Kerr nonlinearities, X-quadrature homodyne measurements, and single-partite projection measurements are performed only at Bob's site, a two-qutrit maximally entangled Bell state can be distilled, while previous entanglement concentration protocols mostly focused on two-level qubit systems.

What carries the argument

Cross-Kerr nonlinearity-assisted entanglement concentration with single-site X-quadrature homodyne detection and linear-optical single-qutrit projections that extracts maximal entanglement without prior knowledge of the state parameters.

If this is right

  • The scheme succeeds for unknown parameters, removing the need for prior characterization required in many earlier protocols.
  • It operates in high-dimensional systems, potentially increasing information capacity and noise resilience during transmission.
  • Concentrated partially entangled qubit states emerge as by-products that remain usable for other quantum information tasks.
  • Single-qutrit projections are realized with linear optical elements alone, avoiding nonlinear resources for that step.
  • A separate linear-optical version of the protocol is provided for the case of known parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The single-site nature of the operations could reduce synchronization requirements in distributed quantum networks.
  • The approach might be testable in current optical setups using weak cross-Kerr media or equivalent effective interactions.
  • Extensions to dimensions higher than three would follow the same measurement structure if the nonlinear phase shifts remain controllable.
  • The by-product qubit states suggest a resource-recycling aspect that could be quantified in multi-round protocols.

Load-bearing premise

Cross-Kerr nonlinearities and the single-partite projection measurements can be implemented with sufficient fidelity when the input state parameters are unknown and the dimension is higher than two.

What would settle it

Implement the protocol on a high-dimensional partial Bell state with unknown coefficients and measure the output fidelity; if the distilled state does not reach the fidelity of a maximally entangled two-qutrit Bell state or if success probability is zero across parameter ranges, the scheme fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12338 by Guo-Zhu Song, Hai-Rui Wei, Si-Qi Du.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic diagram of the operations performed by Alice and Bob to concentrate a two-qutrit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A schematic diagram of the unitary transformation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic diagram of the variable beam splitter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Average fidelity of the block Tmn. Here ∆ωmn = ∆φmn, ωmn = π 4 , and φmn = π 3 are taken. Now we consider the feasibility of the cross-Kerr nonlinearity. In our ECP scheme, four possible measurement outcomes of the coherent state |α⟩, i.e., 0, 2θ, 3θ, and 4θ are taken into account. The peaks of Gaussian curves f(X, α cos(iθ)) (i = 0, 2, 3, 4) at 2α, 2α cos(2θ), 2α cos(3θ), and 2α cos(4θ). The Gaussian func… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Gaussian function curves of f(X, α) (red line), f(X, α cos 2θ) (black line), f(X, α cos 3θ) (blue line), and f(X, α cos 4θ) (purple line). Here α = 5000 and θ = 10−2 are taken. Let us analysis the success probability of our X-homodyne measurement. Considering the photon dissipation of the coherent state, the success probability Psuc of the homodyne measurement is given by Psuc(α, θ, γt) = 1 − 1 2 erfc[ e −… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The success probability of X-homodyne measurement PX as a function of α and γt in the qutrit ECP scheme. Here θ = 0.35 [76] is taken. 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 P X t=0 t=0.5 t=1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The success probability of X-homodyne measurement PX as a function of α in the qutrit ECP scheme. Here θ = 0.35 [76] is taken. B. High-dimensional ECP with known parameters If the parameters α, β, and γ of the normalization less-entangled state |Φ⟩ = α|0a0b⟩ + β|1a1b⟩ + γ|2a2b⟩, (47) are known to Alice and Bob, |Φ⟩ can be distilled into the maximally entangled state √ 1 3 (|0a0b⟩ + |1a1b⟩ + |2a2b⟩) by sole… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Schematic diagram of our ECP for a two photon partially entangled qutrit state with known parameters in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-dimensional quantum systems offer a number of advantages in larger information capacity, stronger noise resiliency, higher improved efficiency and accuracy over the qubit systems. In quantum communication the maximally entangled states will inevitably become mixed states or less-entangled pure states by the channel noise during the practical transmission or storage. We propose a universal scheme to concentrate nonlocal high-dimensional generalized Bell states with unknown parameters. After the cross-Kerr nonlinearities, $X$-quadrature homodyne measurements, and single-partite projection measurements are performed only at Bob's site, a two-qutrit maximally entangled Bell state can be distilled, while previous entanglement concentration protocols (ECPs) mostly focused on two-level qubit systems. The concentrated partially entangled qubit states, reserved as the by-product are the fascinating resources for some quantum information processing tasks. Moreover, single-qutrit projection measurement, the key ingredient for our ECP with unknown parameters, are completed by using linear optical elements. Additionally, linear optical high-dimensional ECP with known parameters are also designed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a universal entanglement concentration protocol for nonlocal high-dimensional generalized Bell states with unknown parameters. Using cross-Kerr nonlinearities, X-quadrature homodyne measurements, and single-partite projection measurements performed exclusively at one party's site (Bob), the scheme distills a maximally entangled two-qutrit Bell state. It also presents a linear-optical variant for the known-parameter case and notes that the residual partially entangled states serve as useful by-products for other quantum tasks.

Significance. If the protocol derivations hold and the idealized components are shown to be robust, this would meaningfully extend entanglement concentration techniques beyond qubits to higher-dimensional systems, leveraging their advantages in capacity and noise resilience. The one-sided operation and linear-optical projections are practical strengths for quantum communication applications.

major comments (2)
  1. [Protocol description] Protocol section (cross-Kerr and homodyne steps): the central claim that the scheme works universally for arbitrary unknown coefficients requires an explicit derivation showing that the imparted phase shifts and homodyne heralding are independent of those coefficients; without this, the universality for unknown parameters cannot be verified.
  2. [Protocol description] No error analysis or bounds provided on the minimum cross-Kerr nonlinearity strength, photon-loss tolerance, or decoherence effects needed to achieve high-fidelity distillation in d=3 systems; this is load-bearing for the practical claim of distilling maximally entangled states.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the exact form of the generalized Bell state and the single-qutrit projection operators used in the linear-optical implementation.
  2. Add a comparison table of success probabilities or resource requirements versus existing qubit ECPs to highlight the high-dimensional advantage.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive overall assessment of our work. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the protocol.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Protocol description] Protocol section (cross-Kerr and homodyne steps): the central claim that the scheme works universally for arbitrary unknown coefficients requires an explicit derivation showing that the imparted phase shifts and homodyne heralding are independent of those coefficients; without this, the universality for unknown parameters cannot be verified.

    Authors: We appreciate this suggestion. The cross-Kerr interaction imprints a phase shift on the coherent probe state that depends solely on the photon number in the signal mode (0, 1, or 2 photons for the qutrit case), independent of the unknown superposition coefficients. The X-homodyne measurement then heralds specific quadrature outcomes that post-select the maximally entangled Bell state. We will insert a dedicated derivation subsection immediately after the protocol description, explicitly expanding the initial state, applying the unitary cross-Kerr evolution, performing the homodyne projection, and showing that the conditional state is the desired maximally entangled state with success probability independent of the initial amplitudes. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Protocol description] No error analysis or bounds provided on the minimum cross-Kerr nonlinearity strength, photon-loss tolerance, or decoherence effects needed to achieve high-fidelity distillation in d=3 systems; this is load-bearing for the practical claim of distilling maximally entangled states.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative error analysis would improve the practical discussion. Our focus is the ideal protocol. In the revision we will add a short paragraph noting that a cross-Kerr phase shift of order π is sufficient to resolve the three photon-number components with current homodyne detection, and that probe-beam loss below a few percent preserves high fidelity. Full bounds on photon loss, decoherence, and the minimum χt required for a target fidelity (e.g., >0.99) depend on concrete experimental parameters and are therefore left as an open direction; we will explicitly state this limitation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: protocol constructed from independent quantum-optical primitives

full rationale

The paper presents a protocol for distilling a two-qutrit maximally entangled Bell state from unknown-parameter high-dimensional generalized Bell states using cross-Kerr nonlinearities, X-quadrature homodyne detection, and linear-optical single-qutrit projections performed only at one party. These steps rely on standard, externally established quantum optics operations rather than any self-referential definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. No equation or claim in the derivation reduces to its own inputs by construction; the central result is a constructive scheme whose validity depends on the physical feasibility of the cited primitives, not on tautology. Minor references to prior ECP literature are contextual and non-load-bearing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Protocol relies on standard quantum optics assumptions (cross-Kerr interactions, homodyne detection) whose practical feasibility is taken as given; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Cross-Kerr nonlinearities can be used to implement the required X-quadrature homodyne measurements and projections for unknown parameters.
    Invoked as the core mechanism of the concentration step.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5473 in / 1171 out tokens · 36743 ms · 2026-05-10T14:56:01.648969+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    BS is 50:50 beam splitter

    are taken forT 20; (φ 10 = 3π 2 , ω10 = π 4 ) are taken forT 10. BS is 50:50 beam splitter. The matrix representation of the BS and phase shifter are given by UBS = 1√ 2 1 i i 1 ! , U P2ω = ei2ω 0 0 1 ! , U Pφ = eiφ 0 0 1 ! .(39) 8 mnT = 2BS 1BS mn Pϕ 2 mn P ω Figure 3: Schematic diagram of the variable beam splitterT mn shown in Fig. 2. BS is 50:50 beam ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Quantum entanglement of identical particles

    Y. Shi, “Quantum entanglement of identical particles”, Phys. Rev. A67(2), 024301 (2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Parallel and heralded multiqubit entanglement generation for quantum networks,

    H. Zhou, T. Li, and K. Xia, “Parallel and heralded multiqubit entanglement generation for quantum networks,” Phys. Rev. A107(2), 022428 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Heralded entanglement between error-protected logical qubits for fault-tolerant distributed quantum computing,

    J. Li, Z. Xie, Y. Li,et al., “Heralded entanglement between error-protected logical qubits for fault-tolerant distributed quantum computing,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67(2), 220311 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Quantum entanglement between optical and microwave photonic qubits,

    S. Meesala, D. Lake, S. Wood,et al., “Quantum entanglement between optical and microwave photonic qubits,” Phys. Rev. X14(3), 031055 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Measurement-based quantum computation beyond the one-way model,

    D. Gross, J. Eisert, N. Schuch,et al., “Measurement-based quantum computation beyond the one-way model,” Phys. Rev. A76(5), 052315 (2007). 14 TABLE III: The correspondences between single-partite measurements, output state, and classical single-qutrit operations to obtain the desired maximally entangled state|Ψ 40 ⟩= 1√ 3(|0a0b⟩+|1 a1b⟩+|2 a2b⟩). Here |Ω3...

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Measurement-based long-range entangling gates in constant depth,

    E. B¨ aumer and S. Woerner, “Measurement-based long-range entangling gates in constant depth,” Phys. Rev. Res.7(2), 023120 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen channels,

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Cr´ epeau,et al., “Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett.70(13), 1895 (1993)

    work page 1993

  9. [9]

    Quantum teleportation in high dimensions,

    Y. H. Luo, H. S. Zhong, M. Erhard,et al., “Quantum teleportation in high dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123(7), 070505 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Quantum teleportation between remote qubit memories with only a single photon as a resource,

    S. Langenfeld, S. Welte, L. Hartung,et al., “Quantum teleportation between remote qubit memories with only a single photon as a resource,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126(13), 130502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Dense coding in experimental quantum communication

    K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, P. G. Kwiat,et al., “Dense coding in experimental quantum communication”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76(25), 4656 (1996)

    work page 1996

  12. [12]

    Quantum key distribution overcoming extreme noise: Simultaneous subspace coding using high-dimensional entanglement,

    M. Doda, M. Huber, G. Murta,et al., “Quantum key distribution overcoming extreme noise: Simultaneous subspace coding using high-dimensional entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A15(3), 034003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Security of quantum key distribution with entangled qutrits,

    T. Durt, N. J. Cerf, N. Gisin,et al., “Security of quantum key distribution with entangled qutrits,” Phys. Rev. A67(1), 012311 (2003)

    work page 2003

  14. [14]

    Entanglement as a precondition for secure quantum key distribution,

    M. Curty, M. Lewenstein, and N. L¨ utkenhaus, “Entanglement as a precondition for secure quantum key distribution,” Phys. Rev. Lett.92(21), 217903 (2004)

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Microsatellite-based real-time quantum key distribution,

    Y. Li, W. Q. Cai, J. G. Ren,et al., “Microsatellite-based real-time quantum key distribution,” Nature640, 47-54 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Information transmission through a noisy quantum channel,

    H. Barnum, M. A. Nielsen, and B. Schumacher, “Information transmission through a noisy quantum channel,” Phys. Rev. A57(6), 4153 (1998)

    work page 1998

  17. [17]

    Quantum advantage and noise reduction in distributed quantum computing,

    J. Avron, O. Casper, and I. Rozen, “Quantum advantage and noise reduction in distributed quantum computing,” Phys. Rev. A104(5), 052404 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Multiparticle entanglement purification protocols,

    M. Murao, M. B. Plenio, S. Popescu,et al., “Multiparticle entanglement purification protocols,” Phys. Rev. A57(6), R4075 (1998)

    work page 1998

  19. [19]

    Entanglement concentration protocols for quantum entangled states,

    T. Song, K. J. Zhang, and H. Jia, “Entanglement concentration protocols for quantum entangled states,” Europhysics Lett.137(3), 38002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Inseparable two spin- 1 2 density matrices can be distilled to a singlet form,

    M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, “Inseparable two spin- 1 2 density matrices can be distilled to a singlet form,” Phys. Rev. Lett.78(4), 574 (1997)

    work page 1997

  21. [21]

    Distillable entanglement under dually non-entangling operations,

    L. Lami and B. Regula, “Distillable entanglement under dually non-entangling operations,” Nat. Commun.15(1), 10120 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory,

    P. Shor, “Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory,” Phys. Rev. A52(4), R2493 (1995)

    work page 1995

  23. [23]

    Quantum error correction of qudits beyond break-even,

    B. L. Brock, S. Singh, A. Eickbusch,et al., “Quantum error correction of qudits beyond break-even,” Nature641(8063), 612-618 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Purification of the residual entanglement,

    L. Zhou, W. Zhong, and Y. B. Sheng, “Purification of the residual entanglement,” Opt. Express28(2), 2291-2301 (2020). 15 TABLE IV: The relations between the coefficients, the|X⟩⟨X|, the single-partite projection measurements, and the concentrated partially entangled qubit states|Ω 5⟩= 2√ 5 |0a0b⟩+ 1√ 5 |1a1b⟩,|Ω 6⟩= 1√ 5 |0a0b⟩+ 2√ 5 |1a1b⟩, |Ω7⟩= 2√ 5 |0...

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    No-go theorems for universal entanglement purification,

    A. Zang, X. Chen, E. Chitambar,et al., “No-go theorems for universal entanglement purification,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134(19), 190803 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Observation of residual entanglement in entanglement purification,

    L. Zhou, C. X. Huang, Y. B. Sheng,et al., “Observation of residual entanglement in entanglement purification,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135(5), 050801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations,

    C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu,et al., “Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations,” Phys. Rev. A53(4), 2046 (1996)

    work page 2046

  28. [28]

    Efficient entanglement concentration for partially entangled electrons using a quantum-dot and microcavity coupled system,

    C. Wang, “Efficient entanglement concentration for partially entangled electrons using a quantum-dot and microcavity coupled system,” Phys. Rev. A86(1), 012323 (2012)

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    C. Wang, T. J. Wang, Y. Zhang,et al., Concentration of entangled nitrogen-vacancy centers in decoherence free subspace,” Opt. Express22(2), 1551-1559 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    A two-step entanglement concentration for the less-entangled four-photon cluster states,

    Z. L. Yang, X. M. Xiu, L. Lv,et al., “A two-step entanglement concentration for the less-entangled four-photon cluster states,” Adv. Quantum Technol.7(3), 2300376 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Entanglement concentration of W state using linear optics with a higher success probability,

    F. F. Du, M. Ma, X. M. Ren,et al., “Entanglement concentration of W state using linear optics with a higher success probability,” Quantum Inf. Process.23(4), 134 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Practical scheme for entanglement concentration,

    Z. Zhao, J. W. Pan, and M. S. Zhan, “Practical scheme for entanglement concentration,” Phys. Rev. A64(1), 014301 (2001). 16

    work page 2001

  33. [33]

    Concentration and purification scheme for two partially entangled photon pairs,

    T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, “Concentration and purification scheme for two partially entangled photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. A64(1), 012304 (2001)

    work page 2001

  34. [34]

    Optimal nonlocal multipartite entanglement concentration based on projection measurements,

    F. G. Deng, “Optimal nonlocal multipartite entanglement concentration based on projection measurements,” Phys. Rev. A85(2), 022311 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    Efficient two-step entanglement concentration for arbitrary W states,

    Y. B. Sheng, L. Zhou, and S. M. Zhao, “Efficient two-step entanglement concentration for arbitrary W states,” Phys. Rev. A85(4), 042302 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Entanglement concentration for unknown atomic entangled states via entanglement swapping,

    M. Yang, Y. Zhao, W. Song,et al., “Entanglement concentration for unknown atomic entangled states via entanglement swapping,” Phys. Rev. A71(4), 044302 (2005)

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    Nonlocal entanglement concentration scheme for partially entangled multipartite systems with nonlinear optics,

    Y. B. Sheng, F. G. Deng, and H. Y. Zhou, “Nonlocal entanglement concentration scheme for partially entangled multipartite systems with nonlinear optics,” Phys. Rev. A77(6), 062325 (2008)

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    Complete hyperentangled-Bell-state analysis for quantum communication,

    Y. B. Sheng, F. G. Deng, and G. L. Long, “Complete hyperentangled-Bell-state analysis for quantum communication,” Phys. Rev. A82(3), 032318 (2010)

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    Efficient single-photon-assisted entanglement concentration for partially entangled photon pairs,

    Y. B. Sheng, L. Zhou, S. M. Zhao,et al., “Efficient single-photon-assisted entanglement concentration for partially entangled photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. A85(1), 012307 (2012)

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    Hyperentanglement concentration for two-photon four-qubit systems with linear optics,

    B. C. Ren, F. F. Du, and F. G. Deng, “Hyperentanglement concentration for two-photon four-qubit systems with linear optics,” Phys. Rev. A88(1), 012302 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Hyperentanglement concentration for time-bin and polarization hyperentangled photons,

    X. H. Li and S. Ghose, “Hyperentanglement concentration for time-bin and polarization hyperentangled photons,” Phys. Rev. A91(6), 062302 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Self-assisted complete maximally hyperentangled state analysis via the cross-Kerr nonlinearity,

    X. H. Li, and S. Ghose, “Self-assisted complete maximally hyperentangled state analysis via the cross-Kerr nonlinearity,” Phys. Rev. A93(2), 022302 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Practically enhanced hyperentanglement concentration for polarization-spatial hyperentangled bell states with linear optics and common single-photon detectors,

    G. L. Jiang, W. Q. Liu, and H. R. Wei, “Practically enhanced hyperentanglement concentration for polarization-spatial hyperentangled bell states with linear optics and common single-photon detectors,” Phys. Rev. Appl.19(3), 034044 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Entanglement of pure states for a single copy,

    G. Vidal, “Entanglement of pure states for a single copy,” Phys. Rev. Lett.83(5), 1046 (1999)

    work page 1999

  45. [45]

    Concentration of higher dimensional entanglement: Qutrits of photon orbital angular momentum,

    A. Vaziri, J. W. Pan, T. Jennewein, etal., “Concentration of higher dimensional entanglement: Qutrits of photon orbital angular momentum,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91(22), 227902 (2003)

    work page 2003

  46. [46]

    Universal distortion-free entanglement concentration,

    K. Matsumoto and M. Hayashi, “Universal distortion-free entanglement concentration,” Phys. Rev. A75(6), 062338 (2007)

    work page 2007

  47. [47]

    Beating the channel capacity limit for superdense coding with entangled ququarts,

    X. M. Hu, Y. Guo, B. H. Liu,et al., “Beating the channel capacity limit for superdense coding with entangled ququarts,” Sci. Adv.4(7), eaat9304 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Overcoming noise in entanglement distribution,

    S. Ecker, F. Bouchard, L. Bulla,et al., “Overcoming noise in entanglement distribution,” Phys. Rev. X9(4), 041042 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Is high-dimensional photonic entanglement robust to noise?

    F. Zhu, M. Tyler, N. H. Valencia,et al., “Is high-dimensional photonic entanglement robust to noise?” Avs Quantum Sci. 3(1), 011401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Hardware efficient quantum simulation of non-abelian gauge theories with qudits on rydberg platforms,

    D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, T. V. Zache, J. Carrasco,et al., “Hardware efficient quantum simulation of non-abelian gauge theories with qudits on rydberg platforms,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129(16), 160501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems,

    D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden,et al., “Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88(4), 040404 (2002)

    work page 2002

  52. [52]

    Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement,

    M. Erhard, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, “Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement,” Nat. Rev. Phys.2(7), 365-381 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    Control power of high-dimensional controlled dense coding,

    W. X. Duan and T. J. Wang, “Control power of high-dimensional controlled dense coding,” Phys. Rev. A105(5), 052417 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Progress in quantum teleportation,

    X. M. Hu, Y. Guo, B. H. Liu,et al., “Progress in quantum teleportation,” Nat. Rev. Phys.5(6), 339-353 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Cervera-Lierta, M

    A. Cervera-Lierta, M. Krenn, A Aspuru-Guzik,et al., “Experimental high-dimensional Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger en- tanglement with superconducting transmon qutrits, Phys. Rev. Appl.17(2), 024062 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Generation of arbitrary high-dimensional qudit-based entangled states,

    F. F. Du, M. Ma, Z. Y. Bai,et al., “Generation of arbitrary high-dimensional qudit-based entangled states,” Phys. Rev. A111(3), 032604 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Arbitrary two-particle high-dimensional Bell-state measurement by auxiliary entanglement,

    H. Zhang, C. Zhang, X. M. Hu,et al., “Arbitrary two-particle high-dimensional Bell-state measurement by auxiliary entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A99(5), 052301 (2019)

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    Simulability of high-dimensional quantum measurements,

    M. Ioannou, P. Sekatski, S. Designolle,et al., “Simulability of high-dimensional quantum measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129(19), 190401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Parallel teleportation of partially unknown quantum operations with multiple degrees of freedom based on the nitrogen-vacancy-center system,

    X. M. Xiu, Z. L. Zhao, Z. Q. Yuan,et al., “Parallel teleportation of partially unknown quantum operations with multiple degrees of freedom based on the nitrogen-vacancy-center system,” Phys. Rev. A111(6), 062621 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Quantum algorithm for high energy physics simulations,

    B. Nachman, D. Provasoli, W. A. de Jong,et al., “Quantum algorithm for high energy physics simulations,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126(6), 062001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Optimal quantum circuits for general multi-qutrit quantum computation,

    G. L. Jiang, W. Q. Liu, and H. R. Wei, “Optimal quantum circuits for general multi-qutrit quantum computation,” Adv. Quantum Technol.7(7), 2400033 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Efficient and deterministic high-dimensional controlled-swap gates on hybrid linear optical systems with high fidelity,

    G. L. Jiang, J. B. Yuan, W. Q. Liu,et al., “Efficient and deterministic high-dimensional controlled-swap gates on hybrid linear optical systems with high fidelity,” Phys. Rev. Appl.21(1), 014001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Qudit-based high-dimensional controlled-not gate,

    F. F. Du, X. M. Ren, M. Ma,et al., “Qudit-based high-dimensional controlled-not gate,” Opt. Lett.49(5), 1229-1232 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Experimental realization of high-dimensional quantum gates with ultrahigh fidelity and efficiency,

    Z. Meng, W. Q. Liu, B. W. Song,et al., “Experimental realization of high-dimensional quantum gates with ultrahigh fidelity and efficiency,” Phys. Rev. A109(2), 022612 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Refined Kerr-effect-based high-dimensional quantum gate,

    F. F. Du, X. M. Ren, G. Fan,et al., “Refined Kerr-effect-based high-dimensional quantum gate,” Opt. Lett.50(4), 1113-1116 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Single-photon quantum-nondemolition detectors constructed with linear optics and projective measurements,

    P. Kok, H. Lee, and J. P. Dowling, “Single-photon quantum-nondemolition detectors constructed with linear optics and projective measurements,” Phys. Rev. A66(6), 063814 (2002). 17

    work page 2002

  67. [67]

    Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits,

    P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto,et al., “Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 79(1), 135-174 (2007)

    work page 2007

  68. [68]

    Controlling photons using electromagnetically induced transparency,

    M. D. Lukin and A. Imamoˇ glu, “Controlling photons using electromagnetically induced transparency,” Nature413(6853), 273-276 (2001)

    work page 2001

  69. [69]

    Observation of the nonlinear phase shift due to single post- selected photons,

    A. Feizpour, M. Hallaji, G. Dmochowski, A. M. Steinberg , “Observation of the nonlinear phase shift due to single post- selected photons,” Nat. Phys.11(11), 905-909 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    Joint wire cutting with non-maximally entangled states,

    M. Bechtold, J. Barzen, F. Leymann,et al., “Joint wire cutting with non-maximally entangled states,” Adv. Quantum Technol.8(5), 2400555 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    Deterministic hierarchical sharing of a partially known quantum operation via a non- maximally entangled state,

    S. Q. Zhou and N. Maihemuti, “Deterministic hierarchical sharing of a partially known quantum operation via a non- maximally entangled state,” Laser Phys. Lett.22(3), 035202 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    Controller-independent quantum bidirectional communication using non-maximally entangled states,

    A. Srikanth and S. Balakrishnan, “Controller-independent quantum bidirectional communication using non-maximally entangled states,” Quantum Inf. Process.19(4), 1-11 (2020)

    work page 2020

  73. [73]

    Efficient quantum-key-distribution scheme with nonmaximally entangled states,

    P. Xue, C. F. Li, and G. C. Guo, “Efficient quantum-key-distribution scheme with nonmaximally entangled states,” Phys. Rev. A64(3), 032305 (2001)

    work page 2001

  74. [74]

    Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator,

    M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein,et al., “Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73(1), 58 (1994)

    work page 1994

  75. [75]

    Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers,

    W. R. Clements, P. C. Humphreys, B. J. Metcalf,et al., “Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers,” Optica 3(12), 1460-1465 (2016)

    work page 2016

  76. [76]

    Deterministic linear-optical quantum control gates utilizing path and polarization degrees of freedom,

    H. Meng, “Deterministic linear-optical quantum control gates utilizing path and polarization degrees of freedom,” Phys. Rev. A105(3), 032607 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    Giant cross–Kerr effect for propagating microwaves induced by an artificial atom,

    I. C. Hoi, A. F. Kockum, T. Palomaki,et al., “Giant cross–Kerr effect for propagating microwaves induced by an artificial atom,” Phys. Rev. Lett.111(5), 053601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  78. [78]

    Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics,

    C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, “Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics,” Springer-Verlag 2010

    work page 2010