arxiv: 2604.12674 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

Origin of multiple skyrmion phases in EuAl4

Y. Arai , K. Nakayama , A. Honma , S. Souma , D. Shiga , H. Kumigashira , T. Takahashi , K. Segawa

show 1 more author

T. Sato

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords Eu(GaAl)4skyrmion latticeFermi-surface nestingRKKY interactionARPESLifshitz transitionhelical magnetismcentrosymmetric magnets

0 comments

The pith

Nesting vectors from a new Fermi-surface pocket explain multiple skyrmion lattices and helical magnetism in Eu(Ga1-xAlx)4 through RKKY interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction or another mechanism produces the multiple skyrmion lattices in this nominally centrosymmetric material. Soft-x-ray ARPES measurements map the three-dimensional bulk bands and detect an aluminum-content-dependent Lifshitz transition that creates an additional Fermi-surface pocket. Several nesting vectors connecting sections of this pocket coincide with the wave vectors of the observed skyrmion lattices and the zero-field helical order. These matches indicate that competing RKKY couplings mediated by the nesting channels generate the entire set of magnetic phases from a single electronic feature.

Core claim

By determining the three-dimensional bulk electronic structure with soft-x-ray angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, we observe an x-dependent Lifshitz transition that generates a Fermi-surface pocket. Multiple nesting vectors derived from this pocket match the symmetries and periodicities of the multiple skyrmion lattices. These same vectors also account for the zero-field helical magnetism, establishing that competing nesting-induced Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida interactions provide a common electronic origin for the complex magnetic phases.

What carries the argument

The Fermi-surface pocket that appears after the x-dependent Lifshitz transition, together with the set of nesting vectors it produces, which select the wave vectors of the magnetic orders via RKKY coupling.

If this is right

The rich magnetic phase diagram arises from competition among several distinct RKKY channels tied to different nesting vectors of the same pocket.
Skyrmion lattices can appear in centrosymmetric compounds whenever Fermi-surface nesting supplies the required modulation vectors.
Tuning carrier density or lattice spacing to shift the nesting vectors offers a route to select or suppress particular skyrmion phases.
The zero-field helical magnetism and the skyrmion lattices share the identical nesting mechanism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same nesting mechanism may operate in related compounds such as pure EuGa4 or other rare-earth intermetallics that host skyrmions.
First-principles RKKY calculations that use the measured band dispersions could predict the ordering temperatures and phase boundaries.
Hydrostatic pressure or further doping could move the nesting vectors and stabilize additional spin textures not yet reported.
The charge-density wave may affect magnetism mainly by reshaping the Fermi surface rather than by activating significant DM interaction.

Load-bearing premise

The nesting vectors seen in the electronic structure are the dominant drivers of the magnetic orders through RKKY interactions, and the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction stays negligible even though the charge-density wave breaks local symmetry.

What would settle it

A direct measurement showing that the RKKY coupling strengths calculated from the observed nesting vectors fall well below the measured magnetic ordering temperatures, or a neutron diffraction result in which the magnetic modulation vectors deviate from the nesting vectors under controlled doping.

read the original abstract

The Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction has been considered essential for skyrmion formation, however, the discovery of skyrmion lattices (SkLs) in nominally centrosymmetric materials where the DM interaction is forbidden, such as Eu(Ga$_{1-x}$Al$_x$)$_4$, has challenged this established view. Recent structural investigations of Eu(Ga$_{1-x}$Al$_x$)$_4$ have further complicated this issue by revealing that the charge-density wave breaks local symmetry, theoretically allowing DM interaction. This raises a fundamental question: are the complex magnetic phases driven by the DM interaction or by alternative mechanisms? Here, using soft-x-ray angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, we determine the three-dimensional bulk electronic structure of Eu(Ga$_{1-x}$Al$_x$)$_4$, and elucidate the electronic origins of its rich magnetic orders. We directly observe an x-dependent Lifshitz transition leading to the emergence of a Fermi-surface pocket. Importantly, multiple nesting vectors derived from this pocket match the symmetries and periodicities of the multiple SkLs. Moreover, these nesting vectors can also account for other magnetic orders, such as the zero-field helical magnetism, suggesting a common electronic origin of the complex magnetic phases. These findings suggest that competing nesting-induced Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida interactions and their engineering can generate and control various SkLs and related topological spin textures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports soft-x-ray ARPES measurements determining the 3D bulk electronic structure of Eu(Ga_{1-x}Al_x)_4. It identifies an x-dependent Lifshitz transition that produces a Fermi-surface pocket, from which multiple nesting vectors are extracted. These vectors are claimed to match the symmetries and periodicities of the observed multiple skyrmion lattice (SkL) phases as well as the zero-field helical magnetic order, supporting the conclusion that competing nesting-induced RKKY interactions provide a common electronic origin for the complex magnetism rather than the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction.

Significance. If the reported nesting-vector matches are quantitatively validated and RKKY dominance is demonstrated, the work would be significant for the field by providing direct experimental evidence for an electronic (Fermi-surface nesting) mechanism generating multiple SkLs in a nominally centrosymmetric material. This challenges the conventional DM-centric view of skyrmion formation and suggests routes for engineering topological spin textures via carrier doping or nesting control. The technical achievement of mapping the bulk 3D electronic structure with soft-x-ray ARPES is a clear strength.

major comments (2)

[§ Results (ARPES data and Lifshitz transition)] § Results (ARPES data and Lifshitz transition): the central claim that 'multiple nesting vectors derived from this pocket match the symmetries and periodicities of the multiple SkLs' is stated without a quantitative table, plot, or error analysis comparing the extracted q-vectors (with uncertainties) to the independently measured magnetic propagation vectors; this match is load-bearing for the RKKY-origin argument and cannot be assessed from the presented text.
[§ Discussion (mechanism assignment)] § Discussion (mechanism assignment): the assertion that RKKY interactions dominate and render DM negligible is not supported by any estimate of relative energy scales, such as a comparison of the RKKY susceptibility peak strength at the nesting vectors versus the DM vector magnitude permitted by CDW-induced local symmetry breaking; this assumption is load-bearing for excluding DM as a driver.

minor comments (2)

The title refers to EuAl4 while the abstract and text use the general Eu(Ga_{1-x}Al_x)_4 formula; specify the exact composition(s) studied for clarity.
[Figure captions] Figure captions and text should explicitly label the extracted nesting vectors on all relevant Fermi-surface plots to facilitate direct visual comparison with magnetic periodicities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the significance of our work and for the constructive major comments. We have revised the manuscript to address the concerns raised and provide point-by-point responses below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: § Results (ARPES data and Lifshitz transition): the central claim that 'multiple nesting vectors derived from this pocket match the symmetries and periodicities of the multiple SkLs' is stated without a quantitative table, plot, or error analysis comparing the extracted q-vectors (with uncertainties) to the independently measured magnetic propagation vectors; this match is load-bearing for the RKKY-origin argument and cannot be assessed from the presented text.

Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. In the revised manuscript we have added Table 1, which tabulates the nesting vectors extracted from the ARPES data (with uncertainties derived from momentum resolution and Fermi-surface fitting) alongside the independently reported magnetic propagation vectors for each SkL phase and the zero-field helical order. We have also added a supplementary figure that overlays the experimental nesting vectors on the measured Fermi surface to allow direct visual and quantitative comparison of both magnitude and direction. These additions make the claimed matches fully assessable. revision: yes
Referee: § Discussion (mechanism assignment): the assertion that RKKY interactions dominate and render DM negligible is not supported by any estimate of relative energy scales, such as a comparison of the RKKY susceptibility peak strength at the nesting vectors versus the DM vector magnitude permitted by CDW-induced local symmetry breaking; this assumption is load-bearing for excluding DM as a driver.

Authors: We agree that a quantitative energy-scale comparison would strengthen the mechanistic assignment. Such a comparison would require detailed many-body calculations of the RKKY susceptibility and microscopic estimates of the CDW-induced DM term, which are beyond the experimental scope of the present work. In the revised discussion we have clarified that the observed one-to-one correspondence between nesting vectors and all observed magnetic periodicities provides direct experimental support for nesting-driven RKKY as the dominant mechanism, while any residual DM interaction permitted by local CDW symmetry breaking is expected to be weak on symmetry and magnitude grounds (consistent with prior theoretical estimates in related centrosymmetric systems). We have added a dedicated paragraph outlining this reasoning. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: nesting vectors extracted from measured ARPES Fermi surface and directly compared to independent magnetic periodicities

full rationale

The derivation chain consists of ARPES measurement of the 3D bulk electronic structure, observation of an x-dependent Lifshitz transition producing a Fermi-surface pocket, extraction of nesting vectors from that pocket, and comparison of those vectors' symmetries and periodicities to separately established magnetic orders (SkLs and helical magnetism). This is a direct observational match between two independent datasets (electronic structure and magnetic structure), not a parameter fit, self-definition, or prediction that reduces to the input by construction. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in the provided text. The interpretive claim that RKKY interactions dominate is an assumption about mechanism but does not render the reported matching circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard condensed-matter assumptions about ARPES bulk sensitivity and the role of Fermi-surface nesting in mediating RKKY interactions. No free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Soft x-ray ARPES accurately determines the three-dimensional bulk electronic structure with sufficient bulk sensitivity and minimal surface-state contamination.
Invoked when the paper states it determines the 3D bulk electronic structure.
domain assumption Matching nesting vectors imply that RKKY interactions stabilize the observed magnetic orders.
Invoked when the paper concludes a common electronic origin via nesting-induced RKKY.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5593 in / 1465 out tokens · 34433 ms · 2026-05-10T14:24:56.221573+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

[1]

K., Bogdanov, A

Röβler, U. K., Bogdanov, A. N. & Pfleiderer, C. Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals. Nature 442, 797-801 (2006)

2006
[2]

Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion Lattice in a chiral Magnet. Science 323, 1166767 (2009)

2009
[3]

& Tokura, Y

Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y . Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 899 (2013)

2013
[4]

& Sampaio, J

Fert, A., Cros, V . & Sampaio, J. Skyrmions on the track. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 152 (2013)

2013
[5]

& Kanazawa, N

Tokura, Y . & Kanazawa, N. Magnetic skyrmion materials. Chem. Rev. 121, 2857 (2021)

2021
[6]

& Tretiakov, O

Göbel B., Mertig, I. & Tretiakov, O. A. Beyond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alternative magnetic quasiparticles. Physics Reports 895, 1–28 (2021)

2021
[7]

Kang, N., Onose, Y ., Tokura, Y

Lee, M. Kang, N., Onose, Y ., Tokura, Y . & Ong, N. P. Unusual Hall Effect Anomaly in MnSi under Pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186601 (2009)

2009
[8]

Neubauer, A. et al. Topological Hall Effect in the 𝐴 Phase of MnSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186602 (2009)

2009
[9]

& Tokura, Y

Shiomi, Y ., Kanazawa, N., Shibata, K., Onose, Y . & Tokura, Y . Topological Nernst effect in a three-dimensional skyrmion-lattice phase. Phys. Rev. B 88, 064409 (2013)

2013
[10]

Jonietz, F. et al. Spin Transfer Torques in MnSi at Ultralow Current Densities. 16 Science 330, 6011 (2010)

2010
[11]

Kurumaji, T. et al. Skyrmion lattice with a giant topological Hall effect in a frustrated triangular-lattice magnet. Science 365, 914 (2019)

2019
[12]

Khanh, N. D. et al. Nanometric square skyrmion lattice in a centrosymmetric tetragonal magnet. Nat. Nanotech. 15, 444 (2020)

2020
[13]

Takagi, R. et al. Square and rhombic lattices of magnetic skyrmions in a centrosymmetric binary compound. Nat. Commun. 13, 1472 (2022)

2022
[14]

Yoshimochi, H. et al. Multistep topological transitions among meron and skyrmion crystals in a centrosymmetric magnet. Nat. Phys. 20, 1001 (2024)

2024
[15]

Yu. X. Z. et al. Near room-temperature formation of a skyrmion crystal in thin-films of the helimagnet FeGe. Nat. Mater. 10, 106-109 (2011)

2011
[16]

Yu, X. Z. et al. Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal. Nature 465, 901-904 (2010)

2010
[17]

& Kawamura, H

Okubo, T., Chung, S. & Kawamura, H. Multiple-𝑞 States and the Skyrmion Lattice of the Triangular-Lattice Heisenberg Antiferromagnet under Magnetic Fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 017206 (2012)

2012
[18]

Ozawa, R. et al. V ortex Crystals with Chiral Stripes in Itinerant Magnets. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 103703 (2016)

2016
[19]

& Motome, Y

Hayami, S., Ozawa, R. & Motome, Y . Effective bilinear-biquadratic model for noncoplanar ordering in itinerant magnets. Phys. Rev. B 95, 224424 (2017)

2017
[20]

& Arita, R

Nomoto, T., Koretsune, T. & Arita, R. Formation mechanism of the helical Q structure in Gd-based skyrmion materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 117204 (2020)

2020
[21]

& Batista, C

Wang, Z., Su, Y ., Lin, S.-Z. & Batista, C. D. Meron, skyrmion, and vortex crystals in centrosymmetric tetragonal magnets. Phys. Rev. B 103, 104408 (2021). 17

2021
[22]

Utesov. O. I. Thermodynamically stable skyrmion lattice in a tetragonal frustrated antiferromagnet with dipolar interaction. Phys. Rev. B 103, 064414 (2021)

2021
[23]

Bouaziz, J. et al. Fermi-Surface Origin of Skyrmion Lattices in Centrosymmetric Rare-Earth Intermetallic. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 157206 (2022)

2022
[24]

& Batista, C

Martin, I. & Batista, C. D. Itinerant Electron-Driven Chiral Magnetic Ordering and spontaneous quantum Hall effect in triangular lattice models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 156402 (2008)

2008
[25]

& Motome, Y

Ozawa, R., Hayami, S. & Motome, Y . Zero-Field Skyrmions with a High Topological Number in Itinerant Magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 147205 (2017)

2017
[26]

Multiple skyrmion crystal phases by itinerant frustration in centrosymmetric tetragonal magnets

Hayami, S. Multiple skyrmion crystal phases by itinerant frustration in centrosymmetric tetragonal magnets. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91, 023705 (2022)

2022
[27]

Nakamura, A. et al. Transport and magnetic properties of EuAl4 and EuGa4. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 84, 124711 (2015)

2015
[28]

Stavinoha, M. et al. Charge Density Wave behavior and order-disorder in the antiferromagnetic metallic series Eu(Ga1−xAlx)4. Phys. Rev. B 97, 195146 (2018)

2018
[29]

Shang, T. et al. Experimental progress in Eu(Al,Ga)4 topological antiferromagnets. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 37, 013002 (2024)

2024
[30]

Kaneko, K. et al. Charge-Density-Wave and multiple magnetic transitions in divalent europium compound EuAl4. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90, 064704 (2021)

2021
[31]

Zhu, X. Y . et al. Spin order and fluctuations in the EuAl4 and EuGa4 topological antiferromagnets: A µSR study. Phys. Rev. B 105, 014423 (2022)

2022
[32]

Shang, T. et al. Anomalous Hall resistivity and possible topological Hall effect in the EuAl4 antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 103, L020405 (2021)

2021
[33]

Miao, H. et al. Spontaneous chirality flipping in an orthogonal spin-charge ordered 18 topological magnet. Phys. Rev. X 14, 011053 (2024)

2024
[34]

153Eu and 69,71Ga Zero-Field NMR Study of Antiferromagnetic State in EuGa4

Yogi, M et al. 153Eu and 69,71Ga Zero-Field NMR Study of Antiferromagnetic State in EuGa4. J. Phys, Soc. Jpn. 82, 103701 (2013)

2013
[35]

Moya, J. M. et al. Incommensurate magnetic orders and topological hall effect in the square-net centrosymmetric EuGa2Al2 system. Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 074201 (2022)

2022
[36]

Vibhakar, A. M. et al. Competing charge and magnetic order in the candidate centrosymmetric skyrmion host EuGa2Al2. Phys. Rev. B 108, L100404 (2023)

2023
[37]

Littlehales, M. T. et al. Spin density waves and ground state helices in EuGa2.4Al1.6. Phys. Rev. Research 6, L032015 (2024)

2024
[38]

Inosov, D. S. et al. Electronic Structure and Nesting-Driven Enhancement of the RKKY Interaction at the Magnetic Ordering Propagation Vector in Gd2PdSi3 and Tb2PdSi3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 046401 (2009)

2009
[39]

Dong, Y . et al. Fermi Surface Nesting Driving the RKKY Interaction in the Centrosymmetric Skyrmion Magnet Gd2PdSi3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 016401 (2024)

2024
[40]

Eremeev, S. V . et al. Insight into the electronic structure of the centrosymmetric skyrmion magnet GdRu2Si2. Nanoscale Adv. 5, 6678-6687 (2023)

2023
[41]

Dong, Y . et al. Magnetic-domain-dependent pseudogap induced by Fermi surface nesting in a centrosymmetric skyrmion magnet. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.08000 (2023)

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.08000 2023
[42]

Kobata, M. et al. Electronic structure of EuAl4 studied by photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 094703 (2016)

2016
[43]

Orthorhombic distortion and rectangular skyrmion crystal in a centrosymmetric tetragonal host

Hayami, S. Orthorhombic distortion and rectangular skyrmion crystal in a centrosymmetric tetragonal host. J. Phys. Mater. 6, 014006 (2023)

2023
[44]

Gen, M. et al. Rhombic skyrmion lattice coupled with orthorhombic structural 19 distortion in EuAl4. Phys. Rev. B 107, L020410 (2023)

2023
[45]

Kotla, S. R. et al. Broken inversion symmetry in the charge density wave phase in EuAl4. Phys. Rev. B 112, 064113 (2025)

2025
[46]

Yang, F. Z. et al. Incommensurate Transverse Peierls Transition. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.10539 (2024)

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.10539 2024
[47]

Vibhakar, A. M. et al. Spontaneous reversal of spin chirality and competing phases in the topological magnet EuAl4. Commun. Phys. 7, 313 (2024)

2024
[48]

Lei, S. et al. Weyl nodal ring state and Landau quantization with very large magnetoresistance in square-net magnet EuGa4. Nat. Commun. 14, 5812 (2023)

2023
[49]

Stabilization mechanisms of magnetic skyrmion crystal and multiple-𝑄 states based on momentum-resolved spin interactions

Hayami, S & Yambe, R. Stabilization mechanisms of magnetic skyrmion crystal and multiple-𝑄 states based on momentum-resolved spin interactions. Materials Today Quantum. 3,100010 (2024)

2024
[50]

Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 21, 395502 (2009)

2009
[51]

Giannozzi, P. et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modeling with Quantum ESPRESSO. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 29, 465901 (2017)

2017
[52]

Pseudopotentials periodic table: from H to Pu

Dal Corso, A. Pseudopotentials periodic table: from H to Pu. Comput. Mater. Sci. 95, 337 (2014)

2014
[53]

& Izumi, F

Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011). Acknowledgments We thank Y . Onose and H. Masuda for fruitful discussion. This work was supported by 20 JST-CREST (no. JPMJCR18T1 to T.S.), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number...

2011