pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15604 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🪐 quant-ph

Many-Body Amplified Nonclassical Photon Emission in Cavity-Coupled Atomic Arrays

Tang Jing , Yuangang Deng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords many-body interactionsnonclassical photon emissioncavity QEDatomic arrayssingle-photon sourcesphoton-pair bundlesquantum interferencedressed states
0
0 comments X

The pith

Programmable phase in cavity-coupled atomic arrays switches between high-purity single-photon and bright photon-pair emission.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that cavity-mediated many-body spin-exchange interactions in an atomic array, tuned by a relative phase φ, reshape the dressed-state manifold to control nonclassical light output. Constructive interference at φ=0 amplifies spectral anharmonicity, improving photon antibunching by four orders of magnitude while keeping strong flux for better single-photon sources. Destructive interference at φ=π suppresses single-photon states to activate pure two-photon processes instead. This addresses the purity-brightness trade-off in quantum light generation by using collective interference effects for on-demand switching between emission regimes.

Core claim

In a cavity-coupled atomic array with programmable relative phase φ, the cavity-mediated many-body spin-exchange interactions reshape the dressed-state manifold and enable deterministic switching between distinct quantum emission regimes. For φ=0, constructive interference yields high-purity single-photon emission with antibunching improved by four orders of magnitude while preserving strong photon flux. Conversely, for φ=π, destructive interference creates a dark single-photon manifold, resonantly activating two-photon processes to produce bright and pure photon-pair bundles.

What carries the argument

The interference-interaction mechanism from cavity-mediated many-body spin-exchange interactions controlled by the relative phase φ, which tunes collective effects to amplify spectral anharmonicity and switch emission regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The cavity-mediated many-body spin-exchange interactions can be precisely controlled via the programmable phase φ without dominant decoherence, loss, or other unmodeled effects that would prevent the predicted reshaping of the dressed-state manifold.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the second-order correlation function showing four-order antibunching improvement for φ=0 or resonant activation of two-photon emission with suppressed single-photon output for φ=π in the cavity output spectrum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15604 by Tang Jing, Yuangang Deng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic of cavity-coupled atomic arrays and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) ns and (b) g (2) 1 (0) as functions of ∆a and φ for V = 0 and δ/∆a = 1/2. (c) ns and (d) g (2) 1 (0) as functions of ∆a and V for φ/π = 0. (e) Optimal g (2) opt(0) (red line) and corresponding p ns,opt (blue line) versus V at ∆a = −V − V2 + 4g 2 a. (f) τ dependence g (2) 1 (τ ) at V/ga = 2. The inset in (f) shows typical distribution ˜p(q) of single photon state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) g (2) 1 (0), (b) ns, and (c) C µµ as a function of ∆a for different δ with V = 2. The inset in (b) illustrates the corresponding g (2) 1 (0) and ns for V = 0 and δ/ga = −1. Single-photon emission.—Introducing SEI strongly re￾shapes the anharmonic energy spectrum and substan￾tially enhances the optical nonlinearity [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a-c) shows ns, g (2) 1 (0), and g (3) 1 (0) in the V-∆a parameter plane for δ/V = −1 and φ/π = 1. (d,e) g (2,3) 1 (0) and ns as a function of V evaluated along the trajectories ∆a = −g 2 a/V (d) and ∆a = 2V (e), respectively. (f) ∆a dependent g (2,3) 1 (0) and ns, and (g) the corresponding spin correlations C µµ for a fixed interaction strength V/ga = 0.4. (h) τ dependent g (2) 1 (τ ) (blue line) and g (2… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The generation of high-performance nonclassical light remains a cornerstone of quantum technologies, yet faces a fundamental trade-off between emission purity and brightness. Here, we demonstrate that cavity-mediated many-body spin-exchange interactions provide a route to overcome this constraint by collectively amplifying spectral anharmonicity. In a cavity-coupled atomic array with a programmable relative phase $\phi$, the resulting interference-interaction mechanism reshapes the dressed-state manifold and enables deterministic switching between distinct quantum emission regimes. For $\phi=0$, constructive interference yields high-purity single-photon emission with antibunching improved by four orders of magnitude while preserving strong photon flux. Conversely, for $\phi=\pi$, destructive interference creates a dark single-photon manifold, resonantly activating two-photon processes to produce bright and pure photon-pair bundles. Our work establishes interference-engineered many-body interactions as a scalable mechanism for on-demand quantum light generation and open a new avenue for harnessing collective many-body physics in quantum photonics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that cavity-mediated many-body spin-exchange interactions in a cavity-coupled atomic array, controlled by a programmable relative phase φ, reshape the dressed-state manifold and enable deterministic switching between quantum emission regimes. For φ=0, constructive interference produces high-purity single-photon emission with antibunching improved by four orders of magnitude while preserving strong photon flux; for φ=π, destructive interference creates a dark single-photon manifold that activates bright and pure two-photon bundles.

Significance. If the results hold, the work demonstrates a scalable route to high-performance nonclassical light by leveraging collective interference effects to overcome the purity-brightness trade-off. The interference-interaction mechanism provides a clear control parameter for emission regimes and represents a strength in connecting many-body physics to practical quantum photonics applications.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4] §4 (numerical results): The central claim of a four-order-of-magnitude improvement in antibunching for φ=0 is load-bearing and requires explicit support. The manuscript should include the baseline g^{(2)}(0) value in the absence of the many-body interactions, the precise master-equation parameters (coupling strengths, decay rates γ and κ), and the numerical method used to obtain the quoted factor.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction use the term 'dark single-photon manifold' without a direct reference to the eigenstates or dressed states; a brief definition or pointer to the relevant equation would improve clarity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (e.g., those showing g^{(2)}(τ) or emission spectra) should explicitly list the parameter values (including φ, detunings, and decay rates) used in each panel to allow direct reproduction of the plotted regimes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on a cavity-QED master-equation model of an atomic array with tunable phase φ that reshapes the dressed-state manifold via interference. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or renamed input; the interference mechanism and resulting single-photon versus pair-bundle regimes are derived from the explicit Hamiltonian and Lindblad terms rather than assumed. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced or quantified. The work relies on standard cavity QED and many-body physics frameworks.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard cavity QED model with spin-exchange interactions and dressed-state manifold
    The claims rest on typical approximations and models from quantum optics for atomic arrays in cavities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5458 in / 1270 out tokens · 49682 ms · 2026-05-10T08:45:13.469012+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. One knob to tune them all: Phase-controlled photon statistics and linewidth in partially pumped atomic ensembles

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    In partially pumped atomic ensembles, a tunable relative phase between pumped and unpumped emission contributions allows control of linewidth scaling and photon statistics from antibunched to bunched.

  2. One knob to tune them all: Phase-controlled photon statistics and linewidth in partially pumped atomic ensembles

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    In a minimal model of partially pumped atomic ensembles, collective dissipation induces interference that allows tuning linewidth from size-independent to extensive and photon statistics from antibunched to bunched vi...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    For two bright polariton branches, ns decreases monotoni- cally with increasing φ and is completely suppressed at φ =π

    Pronounced photon emission occurs at the single- photon resonances, including the sidebands ∆ a/g a = ± √ 2(1 + cos2φ) and middle branch ∆ a/g a = 0. For two bright polariton branches, ns decreases monotoni- cally with increasing φ and is completely suppressed at φ =π . At φ = 0, the emitted field exhibits strong photon antibunching, with g(2) 1 (0) ≃ 2. 7...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Remarkably, photon statistics ex- hibit a sharp transition to strong bunching with g(2) 1 (0) ≃ 10 [Fig

    are symmetric un- der particle exchange, leaving higher-order multiphoton excitations accessible. Remarkably, photon statistics ex- hibit a sharp transition to strong bunching with g(2) 1 (0) ≃ 10 [Fig. 2(b)], signaling multiphoton emission enabled by single-photon dark state formation. This phase- controlled antibunching-bunching transition is funda- men...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Many-body physics with ultracold gases,

    Immanuel Bloch, Jean Dalibard, and Wilhelm Zw- erger, “Many-body physics with ultracold gases,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885–964 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Quantum information with rydberg atoms,

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, “Quantum information with rydberg atoms,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313–2363 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Long-range interacting quantum systems,

    Nicol` o Defenu, Tobias Donner, Tommaso Macr ` ı, Guido Pagano, Stefano Ruffo, and Andrea Trom- bettoni, “Long-range interacting quantum systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 035002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Cold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical potentials,

    Helmut Ritsch, Peter Domokos, Ferdinand Bren- necke, and Tilman Esslinger, “Cold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical potentials,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 553–601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction,

    P. Forn-D ´ ıaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, “Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Cavity qed with quantum gases: New paradigms in many-body physics,

    Farokh Mivehvar, Francesco Piazza, Tobias Donner, and Helmut Ritsch, “Cavity qed with quantum gases: New paradigms in many-body physics,” Advances in Physics 70, 1–153 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Cavity-mediated collective spin-exchange interac- tions in a strontium superradiant laser,

    Matthew A Norcia, Robert J Lewis-Swan, Julia RK Cline, Bihui Zhu, Ana M Rey, and James K Thomp- son, “Cavity-mediated collective spin-exchange interac- tions in a strontium superradiant laser,” Science 361, 259–262 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Exploring dynamical phase transi- tions with cold atoms in an optical cavity,

    Juan A Muniz, Diego Barberena, Robert J Lewis-Swan, Dylan J Young, Julia RK Cline, Ana Maria Rey, and James K Thompson, “Exploring dynamical phase transi- tions with cold atoms in an optical cavity,” Nature 580, 602–607 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Momentum-exchange interac- tions in a bragg atom interferometer suppress doppler dephasing,

    Chengyi Luo, Haoqing Zhang, Vanessa PW Koh, John D Wilson, Anjun Chu, Murray J Holland, Ana Maria Rey, and James K Thompson, “Momentum-exchange interac- tions in a bragg atom interferometer suppress doppler dephasing,” Science 384, 551–556 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Many-body gap protection against mo- tional dephasing of an optical clock transition,

    Zhijing Niu, Vera M. Sch¨ afer, Haoqing Zhang, Cameron Wagner, Nathan R. Taylor, Dylan J. Young, Eric Yilun Song, Anjun Chu, Ana Maria Rey, and James K. Thompson, “Many-body gap protection against mo- tional dephasing of an optical clock transition,” 6 Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 113403 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Spin- momentum-mixing interactions with cavity-mediated su- persolid in spinor condensates,

    Jingjun You, Su Yi, and Yuangang Deng, “Spin- momentum-mixing interactions with cavity-mediated su- persolid in spinor condensates,” Photonics Research 13, 987–994 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Dark super- radiance in cavity-coupled polar molecular bose-einstein condensates,

    Yuqi Wang, Su Yi, and Yuangang Deng, “Dark super- radiance in cavity-coupled polar molecular bose-einstein condensates,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.18125 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom pro- grammable quantum simulator,

    Sepehr Ebadi, Tout T Wang, Harry Levine, Alexander Keesling, Giulia Semeghini, Ahmed Omran, Dolev Blu- vstein, Rhine Samajdar, Hannes Pichler, Wen Wei Ho, et al. , “Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom pro- grammable quantum simulator,” Nature 595, 227–232 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    An atom-by- atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays,

    Daniel Barredo, Sylvain De L´ es´ eleuc, Vincent Lienhard, Thierry Lahaye, and Antoine Browaeys, “An atom-by- atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays,” Science 354, 1021–1023 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules,

    Lo ¨ ıc Anderegg, Lawrence W Cheuk, Yicheng Bao, Sean Burchesky, Wolfgang Ketterle, Kang-Kuen Ni, and John M Doyle, “An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules,” Science 365, 1156–1158 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Supersolid for- mation in a quantum gas breaking a continuous transla- tional symmetry,

    Julian L´ eonard, Andrea Morales, Philip Zupancic, Tilman Esslinger, and Tobias Donner, “Supersolid for- mation in a quantum gas breaking a continuous transla- tional symmetry,” Nature 543, 87 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Superradiant and subradiant cavity scattering by atom arrays,

    Zhenjie Yan, Jacquelyn Ho, Yue-Hui Lu, Stuart J. Mas- son, Ana Asenjo-Garcia, and Dan M. Stamper-Kurn, “Superradiant and subradiant cavity scattering by atom arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 253603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Realization of strong coupling between deterministic single-atom ar- rays and a high-finesse miniature optical cavity,

    Yanxin Liu, Zhihui Wang, Pengfei Yang, Qinxia Wang, Qing Fan, Shijun Guan, Gang Li, Pengfei Zhang, and Tiancai Zhang, “Realization of strong coupling between deterministic single-atom ar- rays and a high-finesse miniature optical cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 173601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Interaction- enhanced superradiance of a rydberg-atom array,

    Yiwen Han, Haowei Li, and Wei Yi, “Interaction- enhanced superradiance of a rydberg-atom array,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 243401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with rydberg atoms,

    Sylvain De L´ es´ eleuc, Vincent Lienhard, Pascal Scholl, Daniel Barredo, Sebastian Weber, Nicolai Lang, Hans Pe- ter B¨ uchler, Thierry Lahaye, and Antoine Browaeys, “Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with rydberg atoms,” Science 365, 775–780 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Observation of average topological phase in disordered Rydberg atom array

    Zongpei Yue, Yu-Feng Mao, Xinhui Liang, Zhen-Xing Hua, Peiyun Ge, Yu-Xin Chao, Kai Li, Chen Jia, Meng Khoon Tey, Yong Xu, et al. , “Observing structural disorder induced interacting topological phase in an atom array,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.06286 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Optimal metrology with programmable quantum sensors,

    Christian D Marciniak, Thomas Feldker, Ivan Pogorelov, Raphael Kaubruegger, Denis V Vasilyev, Rick van Bij- nen, Philipp Schindler, Peter Zoller, Rainer Blatt, and Thomas Monz, “Optimal metrology with programmable quantum sensors,” Nature 603, 604–609 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Variational spin- squeezing algorithms on programmable quantum sen- sors,

    Raphael Kaubruegger, Pietro Silvi, Christian Kokail, Rick van Bijnen, Ana Maria Rey, Jun Ye, Adam M. Kaufman, and Peter Zoller, “Variational spin- squeezing algorithms on programmable quantum sen- sors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 260505 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Quantum sensing in tweezer arrays: Optical magnetometry on an individual- atom sensor grid,

    Dominik Sch¨ affner, Tobias Schreiber, Fabian Lenz, Malte Schlosser, and Gerhard Birkl, “Quantum sensing in tweezer arrays: Optical magnetometry on an individual- atom sensor grid,” PRX Quantum 5, 010311 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Entanglement of two individual neutral atoms using rydberg blockade,

    T. Wilk, A. Ga¨ etan, C. Evellin, J. Wolters, Y. Miroshny- chenko, P. Grangier, and A. Browaeys, “Entanglement of two individual neutral atoms using rydberg blockade,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 010502 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    On-demand entanglement of molecules in a reconfig- urable optical tweezer array,

    Connor M Holland, Yukai Lu, and Lawrence W Cheuk, “On-demand entanglement of molecules in a reconfig- urable optical tweezer array,” Science 382, 1143–1147 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Dipolar spin-exchange and entanglement be- tween molecules in an optical tweezer array,

    Yicheng Bao, Scarlett S Yu, Lo ¨ ıc Anderegg, Eunmi Chae, Wolfgang Ketterle, Kang-Kuen Ni, and John M Doyle, “Dipolar spin-exchange and entanglement be- tween molecules in an optical tweezer array,” Science 382, 1138–1143 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Long-lived bell states in an array of optical clock qubits,

    Nathan Schine, Aaron W Young, William J Eckner, Michael J Martin, and Adam M Kaufman, “Long-lived bell states in an array of optical clock qubits,” Nat. Phys. 18, 1067–1073 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Photon blockade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom,

    Kevin M Birnbaum, Andreea Boca, Russell Miller, Allen D Boozer, Tracy E Northup, and H Jeff Kimble, “Photon blockade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom,” Nature 436, 87–90 (2005)

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    A photon turnstile dynamically regulated by one atom,

    Barak Dayan, AS Parkins, Takao Aoki, EP Ostby, KJ Va- hala, and HJ Kimble, “A photon turnstile dynamically regulated by one atom,” Science 319, 1062–1065 (2008)

    work page 2008

  33. [33]

    Two-photon blockade in an atom- driven cavity qed system,

    Christoph Hamsen, Karl Nicolas Tolazzi, Tatjana Wilk, and Gerhard Rempe, “Two-photon blockade in an atom- driven cavity qed system,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 133604 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Universal photon block- ade,

    Yan-Hui Zhou, Tong Liu, Qi-Ping Su, Xing-Yuan Zhang, Qi-Cheng Wu, Dong-Xu Chen, Zhi-Cheng Shi, H. Z. Shen, and Chui-Ping Yang, “Universal photon block- ade,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 183601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Chi- ral interaction induced near-perfect photon blockade,

    Zhi-Guang Lu, Ying Wu, and Xin-You L¨ u, “Chi- ral interaction induced near-perfect photon blockade,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 013602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Emitters of n-photon bun- dles,

    C S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, E Del Valle, A Gonz´ alez Tudela, K M¨ uller, S Lichtmannecker, M Kaniber, C Tejedor, JJ Finley, and FP Laussy, “Emitters of n-photon bun- dles,” Nat. photonics 8, 550–555 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Determinis- tic generation of multi-photon bundles in a quantum rabi model,

    Cheng Liu, Jin-Feng Huang, and Lin Tian, “Determinis- tic generation of multi-photon bundles in a quantum rabi model,” Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 66, 220311 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Nonreciprocal bundle emissions of quantum entan- gled pairs,

    Qian Bin, Hui Jing, Ying Wu, Franco Nori, and Xin-You L¨ u, “Nonreciprocal bundle emissions of quantum entan- gled pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 043601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities,

    Stephan Ritter, Christian N¨ olleke, Carolin Hahn, An- dreas Reiserer, Andreas Neuzner, Manuel Uphoff, Mar- tin M¨ ucke, Eden Figueroa, Joerg Bochmann, and Ger- hard Rempe, “An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities,” Nature 484, 195–200 (2012)

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    All-silicon quantum light source by embedding an atomic emissive center in a nanophotonic cavity,

    Walid Redjem, Yertay Zhiyenbayev, Wayesh Qarony, Vsevolod Ivanov, Christos Papapanos, Wei Liu, Kaushalya Jhuria, ZY Al Balushi, Scott Dhuey, Adam Schwartzberg, et al. , “All-silicon quantum light source by embedding an atomic emissive center in a nanophotonic cavity,” Nat. Commun. 14, 3321 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Long-distance quantum communication with atomic en- sembles and linear optics,

    L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Long-distance quantum communication with atomic en- sembles and linear optics,” Nature 414, 413 (2001)

    work page 2001

  42. [42]

    The quantum internet,

    H. J. Kimble, “The quantum internet,” Nature 453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    Nondestructive detection of photonic 7 qubits,

    Dominik Niemietz, Pau Farrera, Stefan Langenfeld, and Gerhard Rempe, “Nondestructive detection of photonic 7 qubits,” Nature 591, 570–574 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Advances in quantum metrology,

    Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone, “Advances in quantum metrology,” Nature Photonics 5, 222 (2011)

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    Highly charged ions: Op- tical clocks and applications in fundamental physics,

    M. G. Kozlov, M. S. Safronova, J. R. Crespo L´ opez- Urrutia, and P. O. Schmidt, “Highly charged ions: Op- tical clocks and applications in fundamental physics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles,

    Luca Pezz` e, Augusto Smerzi, Markus K. Oberthaler, Roman Schmied, and Philipp Treutlein, “Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Interactions mediated by atoms, photons, electrons, and excitons,

    Rosario Paredes, Georg Bruun, and Ar- turo Camacho-Guardian, “Interactions mediated by atoms, photons, electrons, and excitons,” Phys. Rev. A 110, 030101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Mul- timode photon blockade,

    Srivatsan Chakram, Kevin He, Akash V Dixit, Andrew E Oriani, Ravi K Naik, Nelson Leung, Hyeokshin Kwon, Wen-Long Ma, Liang Jiang, and David I Schuster, “Mul- timode photon blockade,” Nature Physics 18, 879–884 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Phases, instabilities and excitations in a two-component lattice model with photon-mediated interactions,

    Leon Carl, Rodrigo Rosa-Medina, Sebastian D Huber, Tilman Esslinger, Nishant Dogra, and Tena Dubcek, “Phases, instabilities and excitations in a two-component lattice model with photon-mediated interactions,” Phys- ical Review Research 5, L032003 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Out-of-equilibrium dynamics of quantum many-body systems with long-range interactions,

    Nicol` o Defenu, Alessio Lerose, and Silvia Pappalardi, “Out-of-equilibrium dynamics of quantum many-body systems with long-range interactions,” Physics Reports 1074, 1–92 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Observing dynamical phases of bcs super- conductors in a cavity qed simulator,

    Dylan J Young, Anjun Chu, Eric Yilun Song, Diego Bar- berena, David Wellnitz, Zhijing Niu, Vera M Sch¨ afer, Robert J Lewis-Swan, Ana Maria Rey, and James K Thompson, “Observing dynamical phases of bcs super- conductors in a cavity qed simulator,” Nature 625, 679– 684 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Deterministic down-converter and continu- ous photon-pair source within the bad-cavity limit,

    Yue Chang, Alejandro Gonz´ alez-Tudela, Carlos S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, Carlos Navarrete-Benlloch, and Tao Shi, “Deterministic down-converter and continu- ous photon-pair source within the bad-cavity limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 203602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  53. [53]

    Motional n-phonon bundle states of a trapped atom with clock transitions photon,

    Y Deng, T Shi, and S Yi, “Motional n-phonon bundle states of a trapped atom with clock transitions photon,” (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Parity- symmetry-protected multiphoton bundle emission,

    Qian Bin, Ying Wu, and Xin-You L¨ u, “Parity- symmetry-protected multiphoton bundle emission,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 073602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Interference and dynamics of light from a distance-controlled atom pair in an optical cavity,

    Andreas Neuzner, Matthias K¨ orber, Olivier Morin, Stephan Ritter, and Gerhard Rempe, “Interference and dynamics of light from a distance-controlled atom pair in an optical cavity,” Nat. Photonics 10, 303–306 (2016)

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    Scalable photonic quan- tum technologies,

    Hui Wang, Timothy C Ralph, Jelmer J Renema, Chao- Yang Lu, and Jian-Wei Pan, “Scalable photonic quan- tum technologies,” Nature Materials , 1–15 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Tunable multipho- ton bundles emission in a kerr-type two-photon jaynes- cummings model,

    Jing Tang and Yuangang Deng, “Tunable multipho- ton bundles emission in a kerr-type two-photon jaynes- cummings model,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033247 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Magneti- cally induced optical transparency on a forbidden tran- sition in strontium for cavity-enhanced spectroscopy,

    Matthew N. Winchester, Matthew A. Norcia, Julia R. K. Cline, and James K. Thompson, “Magneti- cally induced optical transparency on a forbidden tran- sition in strontium for cavity-enhanced spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 263601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    Cavity-enabled real-time observation of individual atomic collisions,

    Matthew L. Peters, Guoqing Wang, David C. Spier- ings, Niv Drucker, Beili Hu, Meng-Wei Chen, Yu- Ting Chen, and Vladan Vuleti´ c, “Cavity-enabled real-time observation of individual atomic collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 093402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Observation of a continuous time crystal,

    Phatthamon Kongkhambut, Jim Skulte, Ludwig Mathey, Jayson G Cosme, Andreas Hemmerich, and Hans Keßler, “Observation of a continuous time crystal,” Science 377, 670–673 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Tunable single-and multiphoton bun- dles in cavity-coupled atomic arrays,

    Geng Zhao, Yun Chen, Jiayuang Zhang, Jing Tang, and Yuangang Deng, “Tunable single-and multiphoton bun- dles in cavity-coupled atomic arrays,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.01250 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Confined meson excitations in rydberg-atom arrays coupled to a cavity field,

    Tharnier O. Puel and Tommaso Macr ` ı, “Confined meson excitations in rydberg-atom arrays coupled to a cavity field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 106901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    The- ory of frequency-filtered and time-resolved n-photon cor- relations,

    Elena del Valle, Alejandro Gonzalez-Tudela, Fabrice P Laussy, Carlos Tejedor, and Michael J Hartmann, “The- ory of frequency-filtered and time-resolved n-photon cor- relations,” Physical review letters 109, 183601 (2012). End Matter Quantum statistics .–To characterize quantum correla- tions of the emitted nonclassical light, we describe the nonequilibrium...

    work page 2012

  64. [64]

    Notably, the combined control of SEI V and phase φ thus pro- vides a powerful and tunable mechanism for engineer- ing photon statistics, by shaping quantum interference between distinct atom cavity excitation pathways and modifying many-body excitation gaps, thereby suppress- ing Doppler-induced dephasing [ 9, 10]. For nonzero SEI ( V ̸ = 0), the effective...

    work page