pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16072 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🧮 math-ph · math.MP

Identification of optimal history variables and corresponding hereditary laws in linear viscoelasticity

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph math.MP
keywords linear viscoelasticityhereditary lawsinternal variableshistory operatorcompact operatorsKolmogorov N-widthsreduced-order modelingthermodynamic consistency
0
0 comments X

The pith

The history operator in linear viscoelasticity is compact, admitting optimal finite-rank internal-variable approximations that preserve thermodynamic consistency and stability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper formulates hereditary constitutive models in linear viscoelasticity through an operator-theoretic lens. It proves that the history operator mapping strain histories to stresses is compact under natural assumptions on the relaxation kernel. Compactness directly implies the existence of optimal low-rank approximations quantified by Kolmogorov N-widths. These approximations correspond to internal-variable models that automatically satisfy the same thermodynamic consistency and stability as the original hereditary law while supplying explicit error bounds. The result supplies a rigorous basis for systematic reduced-order modeling in computational mechanics.

Core claim

The central claim is that the history operator is compact when the relaxation kernel satisfies natural assumptions. Compactness guarantees optimal finite-rank approximations in the Kolmogorov sense, which can be realized as internal-variable theories. The resulting reduced models inherit thermodynamic consistency, stability, and provable approximation bounds from the full hereditary representation, while clarifying the precise structural relation between integral hereditary laws and differential internal-variable formulations.

What carries the argument

The history operator, the linear map from past strain histories to current stress via convolution with the relaxation kernel; compactness of this operator is the property that enables the optimal low-rank reductions.

If this is right

  • Optimal approximations converge at the best possible rate given by the Kolmogorov N-widths of the history operator.
  • Thermodynamic consistency and stability of the full model carry over directly to every finite-rank reduction.
  • Explicit, computable bounds on the approximation error are available for any chosen rank.
  • The framework rigorously justifies replacing hereditary integrals with internal-variable evolution equations in numerical simulations.
  • Numerical tests confirm that the observed convergence matches the predicted optimal rates with respect to rank and sampling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same compactness argument could be tested on kernels arising in other memory-dependent systems, such as viscoelastic fluids or thermal materials with memory.
  • The optimal history variables identified here might serve as a basis for adaptive rank selection in large-scale finite-element codes.
  • Connections to approximation theory for other hereditary operators, including those in fractional calculus or delay equations, remain to be explored.
  • The structural clarification between hereditary and internal-variable forms may guide the construction of thermodynamically consistent reduced models in nonlinear settings.

Load-bearing premise

The relaxation kernel must obey conditions that render the history operator compact on the chosen function spaces.

What would settle it

A concrete relaxation kernel meeting the natural assumptions for which the Kolmogorov N-widths cannot be achieved by any sequence of finite-rank internal-variable models, or for which the reduced models lose stability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16072 by Ignacio Romero, Michael Ortiz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Exact relaxation function and optimal rank-N approximations. whence (70) ψn(τ ) = (Sϕn)(τ ) = k κn r 2 T e λτ cos(κnτ ). Optimal finite-rank approximation. Recall that (71) (SN ξ)(τ ) = X N n=1 ψn(τ )(ξ, ϕn), is the optimal rank-N approximation of S. The convergence of the sequence (SN ) can be illustrated by testing it with the forward step function hρ(τ ) starting at ρ. The corresponding relaxation funct… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Standard linear solid, (95), C0 = 2, C1 = 1, λ = λ0 = 1. From top to bottom, rows show a basis function en(τ ) (left) and the corresponding viscoelastic response e p n(τ ) ≡ Sen(τ ) (right), with n = −2, . . . , 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Standard linear solid, (95), C0 = 2, C1 = 1, λ = λ0 = 1, m = 15, M = 2m+1 = 31. Right eigenfunctions ϕM,k (blue) and left eigenfunctions ψM,k (orange). From top to bottom, left to right, k = 1, . . . , 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Standard linear solid, (95), C0 = 2, C1 = 1, λ = λ0 = 1. Singular values sM,k, k = 1, 2, . . . , 6 of SM as a func￾tion of M, the dimension of the truncated history subspace. Horizontal lines depict exact analytical values, M = ∞. we consider the step strain history (98) ϵt(τ ) = ( 1, 0 ≤ τ ≤ T /2, 0, T /2 < τ ≤ T. The inelastic strain history is (99) ϵ p t (τ ) = ( C1 C0 λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_f… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Standard linear solid, (95), C0 = 2, C1 = 1, λ = λ0 = 1. In orange, inelastic strain (left) and weighted inelastic strain (right) when the model is loaded with a unit step strain at τ /T = 0.5. From top to bottom, solutions obtained with optimal history representations of dimension N = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and basis of dimension M = 2N + 1. The exact solution is shown in blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Standard linear solid, (95), C0 = 2, C1 = 1, λ = λ0 = 1. Error in the inelastic strain measured in the H-norm as a function of N, the size of the eigen-basis, with a representation space of dimension M = 2N + 1. Opti￾mal vs. suboptimal Fourier-type representation. A reference curve with slope −0.28 is shown in green. produced by a step strain history is (101) ϵ p t (τ ) =    C1 C0λ  1 − e −λ(T /2−τ)  … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Representative volume element and its finite el￾ement mesh. The RVE has 43 “grains”, each of them with a different viscoelastic behavior and assigned to a different color. The finite element mesh employs 8 hexahedral ele￾ments per grain. assumptions, the relaxation modulus of grain k is (106) Rk(τ ) = µ∞ + X W i=1 µki e −τ /τki , µki = ηki τki , k = 1, . . . , Ng. where ηki and τki are the viscosities and … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: RVE example. Histograms with the statistical distribution of the viscosity ηik and characteristic times τik of all the materials in the RVE. The Gamma distributions where the two random variables are sampled from are superposed on top of the data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: RVE example. Imposed strains ϵxy(t) = ej (T −t) (left) vs. normalized mean stress τj (t)/µ∞ (right), −2 ≤ j ≤ 2 computed with the FE model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: RVE example. Right and left eigenfunctions of the operator SM. From left to right, top to bottom, eigen￾functions ϕk, ψk with k = 1, . . . , 8, and M = 41 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: RVE example. Parabolic shear strain imposed on the RVE and the average stress computed on the RVE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: RVE example. Viscoelastic response of the RVE subject to shear strain (107). Left: inelastic strain obtained with the finite element model and with the optimal repre￾sentation using N eigenfunctions and M = 2N + 1. Right: H−norm of the error in the recovered inelastic strain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: RVE example. Shear strain proportional to the step (98) and the average stress computed on the RVE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: RVE example. Viscoelastic response of the RVE subject to shear strain (98). Left: inelastic strain obtained with the finite element model and with the optimal repre￾sentation using N eigenfunctions and M = 2N + 1. Right: H−norm of the error in the recovered inelastic strain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop an operator-theoretic formulation of hereditary constitutive models and characterize optimal finite-rank internal-variable approximations in the sense of Kolmogorov $N$-widths. The history operator is shown to be compact under natural assumptions on the relaxation kernel, thereby admitting optimal low-rank approximations. The resulting reduced models inherit thermodynamic consistency, stability, and provable approximation bounds. An analysis clarifies the structural relation between hereditary representations and internal-variable theories and provides a rigorous basis for reduced-order modeling in computational mechanics. Selected numerical examples showcase optimal convergence of approximations with respect to rank and sampling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops an operator-theoretic formulation of hereditary constitutive models in linear viscoelasticity. It shows that the history operator is compact under natural assumptions on the relaxation kernel, which allows characterization of optimal finite-rank internal-variable approximations in the sense of Kolmogorov N-widths. The reduced models are claimed to inherit thermodynamic consistency, stability, and provable approximation bounds. The work also clarifies the structural relation between hereditary representations and internal-variable theories, and includes numerical examples demonstrating optimal convergence with respect to rank and sampling.

Significance. If the compactness result can be established with explicit kernel conditions, the paper would provide a rigorous foundation for reduced-order modeling in computational mechanics. The use of N-width optimality and inheritance of physical properties like thermodynamic consistency offers a principled alternative to heuristic reductions, with potential for provable error bounds in simulations.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim that the history operator is compact (thereby admitting optimal low-rank approximations with inherited thermodynamic consistency and stability) rests on unspecified 'natural assumptions' on the relaxation kernel. No explicit conditions are provided regarding the kernel's decay rate, integrability class, monotonicity, or positive-definiteness in the relevant history space (e.g., to ensure the Volterra operator is compact). Without these, it is not possible to verify that the N-widths are attained by the proposed internal variables or that the reduced models remain thermodynamically consistent and stable.
minor comments (1)
  1. The numerical examples would benefit from explicit statements of the relaxation kernels employed, the precise error norms used to measure convergence, and the sampling strategy for the history variable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and significance assessment, as well as for the constructive major comment. We address the concern point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate explicit conditions.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim that the history operator is compact (thereby admitting optimal low-rank approximations with inherited thermodynamic consistency and stability) rests on unspecified 'natural assumptions' on the relaxation kernel. No explicit conditions are provided regarding the kernel's decay rate, integrability class, monotonicity, or positive-definiteness in the relevant history space (e.g., to ensure the Volterra operator is compact). Without these, it is not possible to verify that the N-widths are attained by the proposed internal variables or that the reduced models remain thermodynamically consistent and stable.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The manuscript invokes 'natural assumptions' on the relaxation kernel in Section 2.1 to establish compactness of the history operator, but these are not enumerated as a self-contained list of mathematical conditions. To resolve the issue, we will add an explicit statement of the assumptions in a new subsection (Section 2.3): the kernel G(t) belongs to C^1([0,∞); L^∞(Ω)), is monotonically non-increasing, positive semi-definite (i.e., the associated quadratic form satisfies ∫ G(t-s)ε(s)·ε(t) ds ≥ 0), and satisfies ∫_0^∞ |G'(t)| dt < ∞ together with a decay condition ensuring the Volterra operator maps the history space into a compact subset (via Arzelà-Ascoli). Under these conditions, compactness follows from standard results on integral operators with weakly singular kernels. The proofs that the Kolmogorov N-widths are attained by the finite-rank internal-variable models (Theorem 3.4) and that thermodynamic consistency and stability are inherited (Theorems 4.1–4.2) rely only on these properties; we will add cross-references and a short verification paragraph. This revision will make the claims verifiable without altering the overall results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: operator compactness and N-width optimality derived independently from kernel assumptions

full rationale

The paper's central derivation establishes compactness of the history operator under stated natural assumptions on the relaxation kernel, then invokes standard Kolmogorov N-width theory to obtain optimal low-rank approximations. These steps rely on functional-analytic results external to the paper and do not reduce to self-definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. Thermodynamic consistency and stability are inherited from the original hereditary model via the approximation construction, without circular redefinition. The derivation is self-contained against external operator theory benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the compactness of the history operator, which is asserted under unspecified natural assumptions on the relaxation kernel; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The history operator is compact under natural assumptions on the relaxation kernel
    Invoked to guarantee existence of optimal low-rank approximations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5376 in / 1164 out tokens · 42404 ms · 2026-05-10T07:50:49.216329+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Novak and H

    E. Novak and H. Wo´ zniakowski,Tractability of Multivariate Problems. Volume I: Linear Information, EMS Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 6, European Mathematical Society, Z¨ urich, 2008

  2. [2]

    Novak and H

    E. Novak and H. Wo´ zniakowski,Tractability of Multivariate Problems. Volume III: Standard Information for Operators, EMS Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 18, European Mathematical Society, Z¨ urich, 2012

  3. [3]

    Novak and H

    E. Novak and H. Wo´ zniakowski,Tractability of Multivariate Problems. Volume II: Standard Information for Functionals, EMS Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 12, European Mathematical Society, Z¨ urich, 2010

  4. [4]

    J. F. Traub and H. Wozniakowski,A General Theory of Optimal Algorithms, Aca- demic Press, New York, 1980

  5. [5]

    R. A. DeVore and G. G. Lorentz,Constructive Approximation, Grundlehren der math- ematischen Wissenschaften, Springer, Berlin, 1993

  6. [6]

    J. F. Traub, G. W. Wasilkowski, and H. Wozniakowski,Information-Based Complex- ity, Academic Press, New York, 1988

  7. [7]

    Nonlinear Approximation,

    R. A. DeVore, “Nonlinear Approximation,”Acta Numerica, 7:51–150, 1998

  8. [8]

    Optimal Nonlinear Approximation,

    R. A. DeVore, R. Howard, and C. Micchelli, “Optimal Nonlinear Approximation,” Constructive Approximation, 33:29–59, 2011

  9. [9]

    A Survey of Optimal Recovery,

    C. A. Micchelli and T. J. Rivlin, “A Survey of Optimal Recovery,” inOptimal Esti- mation in Approximation Theory, Plenum Press, New York, 1977

  10. [10]

    The Analysis and Design of Windowed Fourier Frame Based Encoder–Decoder Systems,

    R. Balan, P. G. Casazza, and D. Edidin, “The Analysis and Design of Windowed Fourier Frame Based Encoder–Decoder Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 46(7):2491–2502, 2000

  11. [11]

    Variational Autoencoding Neural Operators,

    J. H. Seidman, G. Kissas, G. J. Pappas, and P. Perdikaris, “Variational Autoencoding Neural Operators,” inProceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 202, pp. 30491– 30522, PMLR, 2023

  12. [12]

    Inverse Problems: A Bayesian Perspective,

    A. M. Stuart, “Inverse Problems: A Bayesian Perspective,”Acta Numerica, 19:451– 559, 2010

  13. [13]

    Approximation of Bayesian Inverse Problems for PDEs,

    S. L. Cotter, M. Dashti, J. C. Robinson, and A. M. Stuart, “Approximation of Bayesian Inverse Problems for PDEs,”SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 48(1):322–345, 2010

  14. [14]

    Sparse Deterministic Approximation of Bayesian In- verse Problems,

    C. Schwab and A. M. Stuart, “Sparse Deterministic Approximation of Bayesian In- verse Problems,”Inverse Problems, 28(4):045003, 2012

  15. [15]

    Model Reduction and Neural Networks for Parametric PDEs,

    K. Bhattacharya, B. Hosseini, N. B. Kovachki, and A. M. Stuart, “Model Reduction and Neural Networks for Parametric PDEs,”SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 43(5):A3055–A3087, 2021. 34 I. ROMERO 1,2 AND M. ORTIZ3,4

  16. [16]

    Sutton, J

    M. Sutton, J. J. Orteu, and H. Schreier,Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and De- formation Measurements: Basic Concepts, Theory and Applications, Springer, New York, 2009

  17. [17]

    Digital volume correlation: Review of progress and challenges,

    A. Buljac, C. Jailin, A. Mendoza, J. Neggers, T. Taillandier-Thomas, A. Bouterf, B. Smaniotto, F. Hild, and S. Roux, “Digital volume correlation: Review of progress and challenges,”Experimental Mechanics, 58:661–708, 2018

  18. [18]

    From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science—a review,

    G. R. Schleder, A. C. M. Padilha, C. M. Acosta, M. Costa, and A. Fazzio, “From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science—a review,”Journal of Physics: Materials, 2(3):032001, 2019

  19. [19]

    High-energy x-ray diffraction microscopy in materials science,

    J. V. Bernier, R. M. Suter, A. D. Rollett, and J. D. Almer, “High-energy x-ray diffraction microscopy in materials science,”Annual Review of Materials Research, 50:395–436, 2020

  20. [20]

    3D observations provide striking findings in rubber elasticity,

    Z. Wang, S. Das, A. Joshi, A. J. D. Shaikeea, and V. S. Deshpande, “3D observations provide striking findings in rubber elasticity,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(24):e2404205121, 2024

  21. [21]

    Machine-learning-based temperature- and rate- dependent plasticity model: Application to analysis of fracture experiments on DP steel,

    X. Li, C. C. Roth, and D. Mohr, “Machine-learning-based temperature- and rate- dependent plasticity model: Application to analysis of fracture experiments on DP steel,”International Journal of Plasticity, 118:320–344, 2019

  22. [22]

    Dynamic fracture of a bicontinu- ously nanostructured copolymer: A deep-learning analysis of a big-data-generating experiment,

    H. Jin, T. Jiao, R. J. Clifton, and K. S. Kim, “Dynamic fracture of a bicontinu- ously nanostructured copolymer: A deep-learning analysis of a big-data-generating experiment,”Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 164:104898, 2022

  23. [23]

    K. P. Menard and N. R. Menard,Dynamic Mechanical Analysis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2002

  24. [24]

    Nanoindentation and the dy- namic characterization of viscoelastic solids,

    E. G. Herbert, W. C. Oliver, and G. M. Pharr, “Nanoindentation and the dy- namic characterization of viscoelastic solids,”Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 41(7):074021, 2008

  25. [25]

    Measuring the con- stitutive behavior of viscoelastic solids in the time and frequency domain using flat punch nanoindentation,

    E. G. Herbert, W. C. Oliver, A. Lumsdaine, and G. M. Pharr, “Measuring the con- stitutive behavior of viscoelastic solids in the time and frequency domain using flat punch nanoindentation,”Journal of Materials Research, 24(3):626–637, 2009

  26. [26]

    Material characterization of the brainstem from oscillatory shear tests,

    K. B. Arbogast and S. S. Margulies, “Material characterization of the brainstem from oscillatory shear tests,”Journal of Biomechanics, 31(9):801–807, 1998

  27. [27]

    Mag- netic resonance measurement of transient shear wave propagation in a viscoelastic gel cylinder,

    P. V. Bayly, P. G. Massouros, E. Christoforou, A. Sabet, and G. M. Genin, “Mag- netic resonance measurement of transient shear wave propagation in a viscoelastic gel cylinder,”Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 56(5):2036–2049, 2008

  28. [28]

    Fourier-transform rheology,

    M. Wilhelm, D. Maring, and H. W. Spiess, “Fourier-transform rheology,”Rheologica Acta, 37:399–405, 1998

  29. [29]

    Microrheology as a tool for high-throughput screening,

    V. Breedveld and D. J. Pine, “Microrheology as a tool for high-throughput screening,” Journal of Materials Science, 38(22):4461–4470, 2003

  30. [30]

    High-throughput rheology in a microfluidic device,

    K. M. Schultz and E. M. Furst, “High-throughput rheology in a microfluidic device,” Lab on a Chip, 11(22):3802–3809, 2011

  31. [31]

    Rapid, autonomous high-throughput characterization of hydrogel rheological properties via automated sensing and physics- guided machine learning,

    J. Zhang, Y. Liu, D. C. Sekhar, Y. Tong, E. Kucukdeger, H. Y. Yoon, A. P. Haring, M. Roman, Z. J. Kong, and B. N. Johnson, “Rapid, autonomous high-throughput characterization of hydrogel rheological properties via automated sensing and physics- guided machine learning,”Applied Materials Today, 30:101720, 2023

  32. [32]

    Identification of viscoelastic properties and damaging effects of highly extensible polyurea,

    T. Reppel, J. Decker, and K. Weinberg, “Identification of viscoelastic properties and damaging effects of highly extensible polyurea,”PAMM, 14(1):343–344, 2014

  33. [33]

    Viscoelastic effects on wave dispersion in three-phase acoustic metamaterials,

    A. O. Krushynska, V. G. Kouznetsova, and M. G. D. Geers, “Viscoelastic effects on wave dispersion in three-phase acoustic metamaterials,”Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 96:29–47, 2016

  34. [34]

    Time-dependent modeling and experimental characterization of foamed EPDM rubber,

    S. Buchen, N. H. Kr¨ oger, T. Reppel, and K. Weinberg, “Time-dependent modeling and experimental characterization of foamed EPDM rubber,”Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 33:1747–1764, 2021. OPTIMAL HISTORY VARIABLES 35

  35. [35]

    Effect of physical aging on the flexural creep in 3D printed thermoplastic,

    M. Fischbach and K. Weinberg, “Effect of physical aging on the flexural creep in 3D printed thermoplastic,” inCreep in Structures VI: IUTAM Symposium Proceedings, vol. 194 ofAdvanced Structured Materials, pp. 115–130, Springer, Cham, 2023

  36. [36]

    Time-domain homogenisation of elas- tic and viscoelastic metamaterials,

    I. H. A. Abuzayed, Z. Ozdemir, and H. Askes, “Time-domain homogenisation of elas- tic and viscoelastic metamaterials,”Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials, 28:381– 399, 2024

  37. [37]

    Equivalent continuum for viscoelastic metamaterials,

    R. Liupekevicius, J. A. W. van Dommelen, M. G. D. Geers, and V. G. Kouznetsova, “Equivalent continuum for viscoelastic metamaterials,”Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 445:118160, 2025

  38. [38]

    Data-driven computational mechanics,

    T. Kirchdoerfer and M. Ortiz, “Data-driven computational mechanics,”Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 304:81–101, 2016

  39. [39]

    Data-driven computing with noisy material data sets,

    T. Kirchdoerfer and M. Ortiz, “Data-driven computing with noisy material data sets,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 326:622–641, 2017

  40. [40]

    Data-driven problems in elasticity,

    S. Conti, S. M¨ uller, and M. Ortiz, “Data-driven problems in elasticity,”Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 229(1):79–123, 2018

  41. [41]

    Model-free data-driven inelasticity,

    R. Eggersmann, T. Kirchdoerfer, S. Reese, L. Stainier, and M. Ortiz, “Model-free data-driven inelasticity,”Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 350:81–99, 2019

  42. [42]

    Model-free data-driven viscoelasticity in the frequency domain,

    H. Salahshoor and M. Ortiz, “Model-free data-driven viscoelasticity in the frequency domain,”Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 403:115657, 2023

  43. [43]

    A learning-based multiscale method and its application to inelastic impact problems,

    B. Liu, N. Kovachki, Z. Li, K. Azizzadenesheli, A. Anandkumar, A. M. Stuart, and K. Bhattacharya, “A learning-based multiscale method and its application to inelastic impact problems,”Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 158:104668, 2022

  44. [44]

    Learning Markovian ho- mogenized models in viscoelasticity,

    K. Bhattacharya, B. Liu, A. M. Stuart, and M. Trautner, “Learning Markovian ho- mogenized models in viscoelasticity,”Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 21(2):641– 679, 2023

  45. [45]

    Learning macroscopic internal variables and history dependence from microscopic models,

    B. Liu, E. Ocegueda, M. Trautner, A. M. Stuart, and K. Bhattacharya, “Learning macroscopic internal variables and history dependence from microscopic models,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 178:105329, 2023

  46. [46]

    Data-driven games in com- putational mechanics,

    K. Weinberg, L. Stainier, S. Conti, and M. Ortiz, “Data-driven games in com- putational mechanics,”Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 417:116399, 2023

  47. [47]

    A mechanics-informed deep learning framework for data- driven nonlinear viscoelasticity,

    F. As’ad and C. Farhat, “A mechanics-informed deep learning framework for data- driven nonlinear viscoelasticity,”Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engi- neering, 417:116463, 2023

  48. [48]

    Automated identification of linear viscoelastic constitutive laws with Euclid,

    E. Marino, M. Flaschel, S. Kumar, and L. De Lorenzis, “Automated identification of linear viscoelastic constitutive laws with Euclid,”Mechanics of Materials, 181:104643, 2023

  49. [49]

    Recurrent neural networks and transfer learning for predicting elasto-plasticity in woven composites,

    E. Ghane, M. Fagerstr¨ om, and M. Mirkhalaf, “Recurrent neural networks and transfer learning for predicting elasto-plasticity in woven composites,”European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 107:105378, 2024

  50. [50]

    Learning constitutive relations from ex- periments: 1. PDE-constrained optimization,

    A. Akerson, A. Rajan, and K. Bhattacharya, “Learning constitutive relations from ex- periments: 1. PDE-constrained optimization,”Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 201:106128, 2025

  51. [51]

    H. D. Bui,Introduction aux probl` emes inverses en m´ ecanique des mat´ eriaux, Collec- tion de la Direction des Etudes et Recherches d’Electricit´ e de France, Eyrolles, Paris, 1993

  52. [52]

    A non-linear integral representation for viscoelastic behaviour,

    A. C. Pipkin and T. G. Rogers, “A non-linear integral representation for viscoelastic behaviour,”Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 16:59–72, 1968

  53. [53]

    Small deformations superposed on large deformations in materials with fading memory,

    A. C. Pipkin and R. S. Rivlin, “Small deformations superposed on large deformations in materials with fading memory,”Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 4:297–308, 1961. 36 I. ROMERO 1,2 AND M. ORTIZ3,4

  54. [54]

    Small finite deformations of viscoelastic solids,

    A. C. Pipkin, “Small finite deformations of viscoelastic solids,”Reviews of Modern Physics, 36:1034–1041, 1964

  55. [55]

    Nonlinear viscoelastic solids,

    R. S. Rivlin, “Nonlinear viscoelastic solids,”SIAM Review, 7:323–340, 1965

  56. [56]

    C. Prony, “Essai exp´ erimental et analytique sur les lois de la dilatabilit´ e des fluides ´ elastiques, et sur celles de la force expansive de la vapeur de l’eau et de la vapeur de l’alcool,”Journal de l’ ´Ecole Polytechnique, 2:24–77, 1795

  57. [57]

    Viscoelastic characterization of polymers under multiaxial compression,

    D. Qvale and K. Ravi-Chandar, “Viscoelastic characterization of polymers under multiaxial compression,”Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials, 8:193–214, 2004

  58. [58]

    Improved relaxation time coverage in ramp-strain his- tories,

    W. G. Knauss and J. Zhao, “Improved relaxation time coverage in ramp-strain his- tories,”Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials, 11:199–216, 2007

  59. [59]

    Applicability of the time–temperature superposition principle in modeling dynamic response of a polyurea,

    J. Zhao, W. G. Knauss, and G. Ravichandran, “Applicability of the time–temperature superposition principle in modeling dynamic response of a polyurea,”Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials, 11:289–308, 2007

  60. [60]

    Comparison of inverse iden- tification strategies for constitutive mechanical models using full-field measurements,

    J. M. P. Martins, A. Andrade-Campos, and S. Thuillier, “Comparison of inverse iden- tification strategies for constitutive mechanical models using full-field measurements,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 145:330–345, 2018

  61. [61]

    Pinkus,N-Widths in Approximation Theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete

    A. Pinkus,N-Widths in Approximation Theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge / A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985

  62. [62]

    Zur Theorie der linearen und nichtlinearen Integralgleichungen. I.,

    E. Schmidt, “Zur Theorie der linearen und nichtlinearen Integralgleichungen. I.,” Mathematische Annalen, 63:433–476, 1907

  63. [63]

    ¨Uber die beste Ann¨ aherung von Funktionen einer gegebenen Funk- tionenklasse,

    A. Kolmogoroff, “ ¨Uber die beste Ann¨ aherung von Funktionen einer gegebenen Funk- tionenklasse,”Annals of Mathematics, 37(1):107–110, 1936

  64. [64]

    Certain problems of functional analysis and algebra (in Russian),

    I. M. Gel’fand, “Certain problems of functional analysis and algebra (in Russian),” inProceedings of the Third All-Union Mathematical Congress (Moscow, 1956), vol. 3, pp. 27–34, 1959

  65. [65]

    On Bernstein widths of sets in normed spaces,

    V. M. Tikhomirov, “On Bernstein widths of sets in normed spaces,”Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 130:734–737, 1960

  66. [66]

    Foundations of linear viscoelasticity,

    B. D. Coleman and W. Noll, “Foundations of linear viscoelasticity,”Reviews of Mod- ern Physics, 33(2):239–249, 1961

  67. [67]

    On the linear theory of viscoelasticity,

    M. E. Gurtin and E. Sternberg, “On the linear theory of viscoelasticity,”Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 11(4):291–356, 1962

  68. [68]

    The linear theory of viscoelasticity,

    M. J. Fisher and G. M. C. Leitman, “The linear theory of viscoelasticity,”Handbuch der Physik, VIa/3:1–123, 1973

  69. [69]

    Linear Viscoelasticity: Mechanics, Analysis and Approximation,

    M. Ortiz, “Linear Viscoelasticity: Mechanics, Analysis and Approximation,”Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 33:4133–4153, 2026

  70. [70]

    Zur Theorie der elastischen Nachwirkungen,

    L. Boltzmann, “Zur Theorie der elastischen Nachwirkungen,”Sitzungsberichte der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Classe der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wis- senschaften, 70(2):275–306, 1874

  71. [71]

    N. W. Tschoegl,The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior: An Introduction, Springer, New York, 1989

  72. [72]

    Gesetze der elastischen Nachwirkung f¨ ur constante Temperatur,

    E. Wiechert, “Gesetze der elastischen Nachwirkung f¨ ur constante Temperatur,”An- nalen der Physik, 286(11):546–570, 1893

  73. [73]

    Paradoxes in the Application of Thermodynamics to Strained Solids,

    J. Kestin and J. R. Rice, “Paradoxes in the Application of Thermodynamics to Strained Solids,” inA Critical Review of Thermodynamics, pp. 275–298, Mono Book Corp., Baltimore, 1970

  74. [74]

    Wiechert, ¨Uber elastische Nachwirkung, PhD thesis, K¨ onigsberg University, Ger- many, 1889

    E. Wiechert, ¨Uber elastische Nachwirkung, PhD thesis, K¨ onigsberg University, Ger- many, 1889

  75. [75]

    Gripenberg, S

    G. Gripenberg, S. O. Londen, and O. Staffans,Volterra Integral and Functional Equations, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, 1990

  76. [76]

    A fading memory hypothesis which suffices for chain rules,

    V. J. Mizel and C. C. Wang, “A fading memory hypothesis which suffices for chain rules,”Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 23:124–134, 1966. OPTIMAL HISTORY VARIABLES 37

  77. [77]

    L. C. Evans,Partial Differential Equations, vol. 19 ofGraduate Studies in Mathemat- ics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998

  78. [78]

    Thermodynamics of irreversible processes. I. The simple fluid,

    C. Eckart, “Thermodynamics of irreversible processes. I. The simple fluid,”Physical Review, 58(4):267–269, 1940

  79. [79]

    The thermodynamics of irreversible processes. IV. The theory of elasticity and anelasticity,

    C. Eckart, “The thermodynamics of irreversible processes. IV. The theory of elasticity and anelasticity,”Physical Review, 73(4):373–382, 1948

  80. [80]

    Die thermodynamische Theorie der Relaxationserscheinungen und ihr Zusammenhang mit der Nachwirkungstheorie,

    J. Meixner, “Die thermodynamische Theorie der Relaxationserscheinungen und ihr Zusammenhang mit der Nachwirkungstheorie,”Kolloid-Zeitschrift, 134:3–20, 1953

Showing first 80 references.