pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16962 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-18 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI

Multi-stage Planning for Multi-target Surveillance using Aircrafts Equipped with Synthetic Aperture Radars Aware of Target Visibility

Daniel Fuertes , Carlos R. del-Blanco , Fernando Jaureguizar , Juan Jos\'e Navarro-Corcuera , Narciso Garc\'ia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AI
keywords multi-stage planningsynthetic aperture radartrajectory planningdeep reinforcement learningtarget visibility3D terrainmulti-target surveillanceDubins curves
0
0 comments X

The pith

A multi-stage planning system uses deep reinforcement learning to generate real-time trajectories for multi-target SAR surveillance aware of terrain visibility.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a three-part method to plan flight paths for aircraft carrying synthetic aperture radars when surveying several targets at once. It sequences the order of targets to visit, employs a neural network trained through deep reinforcement learning to select straight flight segments that best expose each target given the surrounding three-dimensional terrain, and then links these segments into a complete path using optimized three-dimensional Dubins curves. Prior methods relied on fixed straight segments that ignored how terrain and aircraft angle affect visibility, limiting their use for many targets under time pressure. If the approach works, it allows aircraft to acquire clear radar images of multiple targets without violating terrain limits and while computing the plan fast enough for live operations.

Core claim

The paper claims that combining waypoint sequencing, a deep reinforcement learning neural network for predicting optimal straight-flight segments that maximize target visibility according to 3D terrain, and trajectory optimization with 3D Dubins curves produces trajectories ensuring high-quality multi-target SAR image acquisition with real-time performance.

What carries the argument

The novel neural network trained with deep reinforcement learning to predict straight-flight segments maximizing target visibility according to the 3D terrain, which is then integrated into a multi-stage planning pipeline.

If this is right

  • The system sequences waypoints to visit all targets in an efficient order.
  • Predicted segments adapt to 3D terrain and target visibility for better imaging quality.
  • Optimization with 3D Dubins curves ensures smooth connections between segments.
  • Evaluations show the approach supports real-time performance for SAR missions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the network generalizes well, it could support missions with moving targets by incorporating time into the state.
  • Integration with live terrain mapping sensors might allow the system to update plans on the fly during flight.
  • The method's separation of sequencing and segment prediction could scale to larger numbers of targets with additional computational resources.

Load-bearing premise

The novel neural network trained with deep reinforcement learning will accurately predict straight-flight segments that maximize target visibility according to the 3D terrain during real-time operations.

What would settle it

A test flight or simulation where the generated trajectory results in SAR images with insufficient quality due to poor visibility or where the planning time exceeds real-time limits for a given set of targets and terrain.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16962 by Carlos R. del-Blanco, Daniel Fuertes, Fernando Jaureguizar, Juan Jos\'e Navarro-Corcuera, Narciso Garc\'ia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Estimated solution in a muti-target scenario. Dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Workflow of the proposed system. The input is a map of targets (blue circles), which are ordered (green lines) using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Segment prediction on a visibility map. Occluded areas are shown in black and visible ones in white. The map is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Performance of the segment prediction network using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between multiple path planning algorithms for trajectory generation utilizing 3D Dubins curves. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Generating trajectories for synthetic aperture radar (SAR)-equipped aircraft poses significant challenges due to terrain constraints, and the need for straight-flight segments to ensure high-quality imaging. Related works usually focus on trajectory optimization for predefined straight-flight segments that do not adapt to the target visibility, which depends on the 3D terrain and aircraft orientation. In addition, this assumption does not scale well for the multi-target problem, where multiple straight-flight segments that maximize target visibility must be defined for real-time operations. For this purpose, this paper presents a multi-stage planning system. First, the waypoint sequencing to visit all the targets is estimated. Second, straight-flight segments maximizing target visibility according to the 3D terrain are predicted using a novel neural network trained with deep reinforcement learning. Finally, the segments are connected to create a trajectory via optimization that imposes 3D Dubins curves. Evaluations demonstrate the robustness of the system for SAR missions since it ensures high-quality multi-target SAR image acquisition aware of 3D terrain and target visibility, and real-time performance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a multi-stage planning system for multi-target surveillance trajectories of SAR-equipped aircraft. Waypoint sequencing is performed first, followed by prediction of straight-flight segments that maximize target visibility (accounting for 3D terrain and aircraft orientation) via a novel neural network trained with deep reinforcement learning; these segments are then connected using optimized 3D Dubins curves. The authors assert that evaluations confirm the system's robustness for high-quality multi-target SAR image acquisition and real-time performance.

Significance. If the DRL network generalizes reliably, the framework could enable scalable, terrain-aware real-time planning for SAR missions, addressing the scalability limitations of prior methods that rely on predefined non-adaptive straight-flight segments. The combination of sequencing, learned visibility prediction, and Dubins optimization offers a structured approach that may improve image quality in complex 3D environments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'evaluations demonstrate the robustness of the system' and 'real-time performance' is unsupported by any reported metrics, baselines, error bars, data splits, visibility quantification method, or runtime numbers, so it is impossible to verify whether the data actually backs the central claim of high-quality multi-target SAR imaging.
  2. [Method] Method (DRL visibility prediction step): the headline result depends on the novel network correctly predicting straight-flight segments that maximize visibility for arbitrary 3D terrains and orientations, yet no held-out terrain accuracy, sensitivity analysis to elevation profiles, or comparison against optimization-based visibility maximization is described; without this, the downstream image-quality and robustness assertions do not follow.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'evaluations demonstrate the robustness of the system' and 'real-time performance' is unsupported by any reported metrics, baselines, error bars, data splits, visibility quantification method, or runtime numbers, so it is impossible to verify whether the data actually backs the central claim of high-quality multi-target SAR imaging.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including specific quantitative metrics. The manuscript body reports evaluation results including runtime measurements for real-time feasibility and visibility scores for image quality. To address this, we will revise the abstract to explicitly state key metrics such as average planning time and visibility improvement over non-adaptive baselines. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Method] Method (DRL visibility prediction step): the headline result depends on the novel network correctly predicting straight-flight segments that maximize visibility for arbitrary 3D terrains and orientations, yet no held-out terrain accuracy, sensitivity analysis to elevation profiles, or comparison against optimization-based visibility maximization is described; without this, the downstream image-quality and robustness assertions do not follow.

    Authors: The network was trained on diverse procedurally generated 3D terrains incorporating elevation and orientation variations, with evaluations performed on separate test scenarios to assess generalization. We acknowledge that explicit held-out accuracy numbers, sensitivity plots, and direct optimization comparisons are not detailed in the current text. We will add these elements, including accuracy on unseen terrains and a runtime/quality comparison on representative cases, in the revised manuscript. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the multi-stage planning pipeline

full rationale

The paper describes a three-stage system: (1) waypoint sequencing to visit targets, (2) prediction of straight-flight segments via a novel DRL-trained neural network that maximizes target visibility based on 3D terrain, and (3) trajectory connection using standard 3D Dubins curve optimization. No equations, derivations, or first-principles results are presented that reduce any output to its inputs by construction. The neural network is trained externally (not fitted within the planning loop to the same data it predicts), sequencing and Dubins steps are standard algorithms, and no self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing. The abstract's robustness claim rests on separate evaluations rather than any self-referential reduction. This is a normal non-circular engineering pipeline relying on learned models and classical optimization.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the accuracy of the DRL-trained network for visibility prediction and the assumption that 3D terrain data is both available and sufficient to model target visibility; no free parameters are explicitly named but the network weights are implicitly fitted.

free parameters (1)
  • neural network weights
    Trained via deep reinforcement learning on (unspecified) data to predict segments.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption 3D terrain data accurately represents target visibility constraints
    The system uses 3D terrain to determine visibility for segment selection.
  • domain assumption Straight-flight segments are required for high-quality SAR imaging
    Stated as a core constraint in the problem setup.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5510 in / 1341 out tokens · 36416 ms · 2026-05-10T06:31:42.810392+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A review of synthetic-aperture radar image formation algorithms and implemen- tations: A computational perspective,

    H. Cruz, M. V ´estias, J. Monteiro, H. Neto, and R. P. Duarte, “A review of synthetic-aperture radar image formation algorithms and implemen- tations: A computational perspective,”Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 5, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Trajectory and resource optimization for uav synthetic aperture radar,

    M. Lahmeri, W. Ghanem, C. Knill, and R. Schober, “Trajectory and resource optimization for uav synthetic aperture radar,” inIEEE Globecom Workshops, 2022, pp. 897–903

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Fast multi-uav path planning for optimal area coverage in aerial sensing applications,

    M. A. Luna, M. S. Ale Isaac, A. R. Ragab, P. Campoy, P. Flores Pe ˜na, and M. Molina, “Fast multi-uav path planning for optimal area coverage in aerial sensing applications,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 6, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Terminal trajectory planning for synthetic aperture radar imaging guidance based on chronological iterative search framework,

    Z. Sun, H. Ren, H. Sun, G. G. Yen, J. Wu, and J. Yang, “Terminal trajectory planning for synthetic aperture radar imaging guidance based on chronological iterative search framework,”IEEE Trans. on Cybernetics, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 3065–3078, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Coverage path planning for sar-uav in search area coverage tasks based on deep reinforcement learning,

    H. Lu, Y . Yang, R. Tao, and Y . Chen, “Coverage path planning for sar-uav in search area coverage tasks based on deep reinforcement learning,” inIEEE Int. Conf. on Unmanned Syst., 2022, pp. 248–253

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Mission plan- ning for energy-efficient passive uav radar imaging system based on substage division collaborative search,

    Z. Sun, G. G. Yen, J. Wu, H. Ren, H. An, and J. Yang, “Mission plan- ning for energy-efficient passive uav radar imaging system based on substage division collaborative search,”IEEE Trans. on Cybernetics, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 275–288, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Heuristic path planning method for multistatic uav-borne sar imaging system,

    F. Xu, Y . Zhang, R. Wang, C. Mi, Y . Zhang, Y . Huang, and J. Yang, “Heuristic path planning method for multistatic uav-borne sar imaging system,”IEEE J.of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 14, pp. 8522–8536, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Sensor-oriented path planning for multiregion surveillance with a single lightweight uav sar,

    J. Li, J. Chen, P. Wang, and C. Li, “Sensor-oriented path planning for multiregion surveillance with a single lightweight uav sar,”Sensors, vol. 18, 2018

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Determining uav flight trajectory for target recognition using eo/ir and sar,

    W. Stecz and K. Gromada, “Determining uav flight trajectory for target recognition using eo/ir and sar,”Sensors, vol. 20, no. 19, 2020

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Vpp: Visibility-based path planning heuristic for monitoring large regions of complex terrain using a uav onboard camera,

    A. J. Sanchez-Fernandez, L. F. Romero, G. Bandera, and S. Tabik, “Vpp: Visibility-based path planning heuristic for monitoring large regions of complex terrain using a uav onboard camera,”IEEE J.of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 15, pp. 944–955, 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Attention, learn to solve routing problems!

    W. Kool, H. van Hoof, and M. Welling, “Attention, learn to solve routing problems!” inInt. Conf. on Learning Representations, 2019

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Searching for mobilenetv3,

    A. Howard, M. Sandler, G. Chu, L.-C. Chen, B. Chen, M. Tan, W. Wang, Y . Zhu, R. Pang, V . Vasudevanet al., “Searching for mobilenetv3,” inProc. of the IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, 2019, pp. 1314–1324

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Uav path planning using optimization approaches: A survey,

    A. Ait Saadi, A. Soukane, Y . Meraihi, A. Benmessaoud Gabis, S. Mir- jalili, and A. Ramdane-Cherif, “Uav path planning using optimization approaches: A survey,”Archives of Computational Methods in Eng., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 4233–4284, 2022

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” inProc. of the Int. Conf. on Neural Inf. Processing Syst., 2017, p. 6000–6010

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Greedy actor-critic: A new conditional cross-entropy method for policy improvement,

    S. Neumann, S. Lim, A. G. Joseph, Y . Pan, A. White, and M. White, “Greedy actor-critic: A new conditional cross-entropy method for policy improvement,” inInt. Conf. on Learning Representations, 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Solving routing problems for multiple cooperative un- manned aerial vehicles using transformer networks,

    D. Fuertes, C. R. del Blanco, F. Jaureguizar, J. J. Navarro, and N. Garc ´ıa, “Solving routing problems for multiple cooperative un- manned aerial vehicles using transformer networks,”Eng. Apps. of Artif. Intell., vol. 122, p. 106085, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    A convnet for the 2020s,

    Z. Liu, H. Mao, C. Wu, C. Feichtenhofer, T. Darrell, and S. Xie, “A convnet for the 2020s,” inProc. of the IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 11 976–11 986

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Efficientnetv2: Smaller models and faster training,

    M. Tan and Q. Le, “Efficientnetv2: Smaller models and faster training,” inInt. Conf. on Mach. Learning, 2021, pp. 10 096–10 106

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Designing network design spaces,

    I. Radosavovic, R. P. Kosaraju, R. Girshick, K. He, and P. Dollar, “Designing network design spaces,” inIEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Maxvit: Multi-axis vision transformer,

    Z. Tu, H. Talebi, H. Zhang, F. Yang, P. Milanfar, A. Bovik, and Y . Li, “Maxvit: Multi-axis vision transformer,” inEuropean Conf. on Computer Vision, 2022, pp. 459–479

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Swin transformer v2: Scaling up capacity and resolution,

    Z. Liu, H. Hu, Y . Lin, Z. Yao, Z. Xie, Y . Wei, J. Ning, Y . Cao, Z. Zhang, L. Donget al., “Swin transformer v2: Scaling up capacity and resolution,” inProc. of the IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 12 009–12 019

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,

    A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly, J. Uszkoreit, and N. Houlsby, “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” inInt. Conf. on Learning Representations, 2021

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    OR-Tools,

    L. Perron and V . Furnon, “OR-Tools,” https://developers.google.com/ optimization/, Google, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual,

    Gurobi Optimization, LLC, “Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual,” https://www.gurobi.com, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Concorde TSP solver,

    V . C. David Applegate, Robert Bixby and W. Cook, “Concorde TSP solver,” http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/tsp/concorde, 2006

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    Results for the close- enough traveling salesman problem with a branch-and-bound algo- rithm,

    W. Zhang, J. J. Sauppe, and S. H. Jacobson, “Results for the close- enough traveling salesman problem with a branch-and-bound algo- rithm,”Computational Mach. Optim. and Apps., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 369–407, 2023

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    A new heuristic algorithm based on christofides algorithm and nearby measures for tsp problem,

    G. Chen, X. Shi, J. Kan, F. Dong, and K. Chen, “A new heuristic algorithm based on christofides algorithm and nearby measures for tsp problem,” inInt. Conf. on Mach. Learning, Cloud Computing and Intelligent Mining, 2023, pp. 448–453

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Heuristic approaches for the probabilistic traveling salesman problem,

    C. Weiler, B. Biesinger, B. Hu, and G. R. Raidl, “Heuristic approaches for the probabilistic traveling salesman problem,” inComputer Aided Syst. Theory - EUROCAST, 2015, pp. 342–349

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    A comparative study of african buffalo optimization and randomized insertion algorithm for asymmetric travelling salesman’s problem,

    J. B. Odili, M. N. M. Kahar, S. Anwar, and M. A. K. Azrag, “A comparative study of african buffalo optimization and randomized insertion algorithm for asymmetric travelling salesman’s problem,” in Int. Conf. on Software Eng. and Computer Syst., 2015, pp. 90–95

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    A review of metaheuristic algorithms for solving tsp-based scheduling optimization problems image 1,

    B. Toaza and D. Eszterg ´ar-Kiss, “A review of metaheuristic algorithms for solving tsp-based scheduling optimization problems image 1,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 148, p. 110908, 2023

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Efficient constraint generation for stochastic shortest path problems,

    J. Schmalz and F. Trevizan, “Efficient constraint generation for stochastic shortest path problems,”Proc. of the AAAI Conf. on Artif. Intell., vol. 38, no. 18, pp. 20 247–20 255, 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Hierarchical width-based planning and learning,

    M. Junyent, V . G ´omez, and A. Jonsson, “Hierarchical width-based planning and learning,”Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Automated Planning and Scheduling, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 519–527, 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Best-first width search: Exploration and exploitation in classical planning,

    N. Lipovetzky and H. Geffner, “Best-first width search: Exploration and exploitation in classical planning,”Proc. of the AAAI Conf. on Artif. Intell., vol. 31, no. 1, 2017

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Congestion- aware policy synthesis for multirobot systems,

    C. Street, S. P ¨utz, M. M¨uhlig, N. Hawes, and B. Lacerda, “Congestion- aware policy synthesis for multirobot systems,”IEEE Trans. on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 262–280, 2022

    work page 2022