arxiv: 2604.17030 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-18 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

Conditional Evidence Reconstruction and Decomposition for Interpretable Multimodal Diagnosis

Shaowen Wan , Yanjun Lv , Lu Zhang , Dajiang Zhu , Bharat Biswal , Tianming Liu , Xiaobo Li , Lin Zhao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords multimodal diagnosisincomplete modalitiesevidence reconstructioninterpretable AIAlzheimer's diseaseneuroimagingconditional modelingevidence decomposition

0 comments

The pith

CERD reconstructs missing modality representations conditioned on each subject's observed inputs and decomposes diagnostic evidence into shared cross-modal corroboration and modality-specific cues via logit-level attribution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents CERD as a way to diagnose diseases like Alzheimer's even when some types of brain scans or tests are missing for a patient. It does this by first filling in the missing information in a way that depends on the individual's available data, then separating the reasons for the diagnosis into parts that all data types support and parts that are unique to one type. This approach is important because incomplete data is common in both research studies and real clinics, and doctors need explanations of what drives the model's conclusion to use it reliably. Tests on the ADNI brain imaging dataset show that CERD works better than other methods when data is incomplete and provides attributions that match clinical knowledge.

Core claim

CERD first reconstructs missing modality representations conditioned on each subject's observed inputs, then decomposes diagnostic evidence into shared cross-modal corroboration and modality-specific cues via logit-level attribution. This framework enables interpretable multimodal diagnosis with incomplete modalities, outperforming baselines on the ADNI dataset while producing structured and clinically aligned evidence attributions.

What carries the argument

The CERD framework consisting of subject-conditioned reconstruction of missing modalities and subsequent logit-level decomposition into shared and specific diagnostic evidence.

Load-bearing premise

That conditioning the reconstruction of missing modalities on a subject's observed inputs will accurately recover subject-specific cross-modal dependencies without introducing systematic bias or artifacts that affect downstream diagnosis and attribution.

What would settle it

A demonstration that the reconstructed modalities introduce biases leading to incorrect attributions or that CERD fails to outperform baselines on a held-out incomplete-modality test set from a different cohort.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17030 by Bharat Biswal, Dajiang Zhu, Lin Zhao, Lu Zhang, Shaowen Wan, Tianming Liu, Xiaobo Li, Yanjun Lv.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Framework of our proposed CERD. The model combines a conditional completion module, a sparse mixture-of-experts for multi-modal fusion, and an evidence decomposition head that attributes diagnosis to shared and modality-unique cues via additive logit contributions. 2.3 Conditional Evidence Reconstruction Module Because modality coverage is often incomplete and static embedding-based imputation can miss s… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Modality importance comparison between the Shared-Private decomposition (left) and a simple importance-score gate (right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Neurobiological and neurodegenerative diseases are inherently multifactorial, arising from coupled influences spanning genetic susceptibility, brain alterations, and environmental and behavioral factors. Multimodal modeling has therefore been increasingly adopted for disease diagnosis by integrating complementary evidence across data sources. However, in both large-scale cohorts and real-world clinical workflows, modality coverage is often incomplete, making many multimodal models brittle when one or more modalities are unavailable. Existing approaches to incomplete multimodal diagnosis typically rely on group-wise or static priors, which may fail to capture subject-specific cross-modal dependencies; moreover, many models provide limited interpretability into which evidence sources drive the final decision. To address these limitations, we propose Conditional Evidence Reconstruction and Decomposition (CERD), a framework for interpretable multimodal diagnosis with incomplete modalities. CERD first reconstructs missing modality representations conditioned on each subject's observed inputs, then decomposes diagnostic evidence into shared cross-modal corroboration and modality-specific cues via logit-level attribution. Experiments on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) demonstrate that CERD outperforms competitive baselines under incomplete-modality settings while producing structured and clinically aligned evidence attributions for trustworthy decision support.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Conditional Evidence Reconstruction and Decomposition (CERD) for interpretable multimodal diagnosis under incomplete modality settings. CERD reconstructs missing modality representations conditioned on each subject's observed inputs, then decomposes diagnostic evidence into shared cross-modal corroboration and modality-specific cues via logit-level attribution. Experiments on the ADNI dataset for Alzheimer's diagnosis claim that CERD outperforms competitive baselines in incomplete-modality scenarios while yielding structured, clinically aligned attributions for trustworthy decision support.

Significance. If the reconstruction step accurately captures subject-specific cross-modal dependencies without bias and the logit-level decomposition provides faithful attributions, CERD could offer a practical advance for multimodal clinical modeling where data incompleteness is common. The framework's emphasis on conditional reconstruction and evidence decomposition addresses a real gap in existing group-wise or static prior approaches, with potential value for trustworthy AI in neurodegenerative disease diagnosis.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of outperformance over baselines and 'clinically aligned' attributions rest on experimental results, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative metrics, error bars, ablation studies, or implementation details (e.g., number of modalities, exact baselines, or statistical tests). This absence is load-bearing because the soundness of the superiority and interpretability assertions cannot be evaluated without them.
[Abstract / Method] Reconstruction component (described in Abstract and presumably §3): The assumption that conditioning reconstruction of missing modalities on observed inputs recovers subject-specific cross-modal dependencies without systematic bias or artifacts is untested in the provided description. No fidelity checks (e.g., reconstruction error, correlation with held-out true modalities on complete ADNI cases) are indicated, which directly undermines the validity of downstream diagnosis performance and the logit-level attribution claims.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: Consider adding a brief statement on the specific modalities involved (e.g., MRI, PET, clinical scores) and the number of subjects or folds used in the ADNI experiments to improve reproducibility context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback on our manuscript. The comments identify key areas where the presentation can be strengthened to better support our claims. We address each major comment point by point below, with planned revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of outperformance over baselines and 'clinically aligned' attributions rest on experimental results, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative metrics, error bars, ablation studies, or implementation details (e.g., number of modalities, exact baselines, or statistical tests). This absence is load-bearing because the soundness of the superiority and interpretability assertions cannot be evaluated without them.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including key quantitative results. In the revised manuscript, we will update the abstract to report specific performance metrics (e.g., accuracy and AUC improvements under incomplete-modality settings on ADNI), mention the number of modalities, list the main baselines, and note the use of statistical tests. This will make the outperformance and interpretability claims directly evaluable while respecting abstract length limits. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract / Method] Reconstruction component (described in Abstract and presumably §3): The assumption that conditioning reconstruction of missing modalities on observed inputs recovers subject-specific cross-modal dependencies without systematic bias or artifacts is untested in the provided description. No fidelity checks (e.g., reconstruction error, correlation with held-out true modalities on complete ADNI cases) are indicated, which directly undermines the validity of downstream diagnosis performance and the logit-level attribution claims.

Authors: The referee is correct that the abstract and high-level method description do not include explicit fidelity checks for the reconstruction step. While the full method section details the conditional reconstruction using subject-specific observed inputs and the experiments demonstrate downstream diagnostic gains, we acknowledge that direct validation of reconstruction quality is needed to support the claims. We will add reconstruction error metrics, correlation analyses with held-out true modalities on complete ADNI cases, and bias checks in the revised experiments section to confirm that the conditioning captures relevant dependencies without systematic artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on proposed method and empirical validation

full rationale

The paper proposes the CERD framework for incomplete multimodal diagnosis, describing conditional reconstruction of missing modality representations followed by logit-level decomposition into shared and specific evidence. No equations, derivations, or mathematical steps are shown that reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains. Central claims rely on experimental outperformance against baselines on the ADNI dataset under incomplete-modality settings, with no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes imported from prior self-work. The derivation chain is self-contained as a novel algorithmic proposal rather than a tautological reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the provided text.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Multimodal data sources provide complementary diagnostic information that can be leveraged even when some modalities are missing.
Implicit in the motivation for multimodal modeling and the need to handle incomplete data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5511 in / 1239 out tokens · 56812 ms · 2026-05-10T07:01:00.787399+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

[1]

European Journal of Radiology (2023)

Borys, K., Schmitt, Y.A., Nauta, M., Seifert, C., Krämer, N., Friedrich, C.M., Nensa, F.: Explainable ai in medical imaging: An overview for clinical practitioners - saliency-based xai approaches. European Journal of Radiology (2023)

2023
[2]

Nature Medicine (2019)

Esteva, A., Robicquet, A., Ramsundar, B., Kuleshov, V., DePristo, M., Chou, K., Cui, C., Corrado, G., Thrun, S., Dean, J.: A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nature Medicine (2019)

2019
[3]

Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (2016)

Havaei, M., Guizard, N., Larochelle, H., Jodoin, P.: Hemis: Hetero-modal im- age segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (2016)

2016
[4]

Alzheimer’s & Dementia (2018)

Jack, C.R., Bennett, D.A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M.C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S.B., Holtzman, D.M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., et al.: Nia-aa research framework: Toward a biological definition of alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia (2018)

2018
[5]

European Journal of Neurology (2018)

Lane, C.A., Hardy, J., Schott, J.M.: Alzheimer’s disease. European Journal of Neurology (2018)

2018
[6]

Frontiers in Neuroinformatics (2018)

Liu, M., Cheng, D., Yan, W., Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Classi- fication of alzheimer’s disease by combination of convolutional and recurrent neural networks using fdg-pet images. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics (2018)

2018
[7]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017)

Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017)

2017
[8]

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2021)

Ma, M., Ren, J., Zhao, L., Tulyakov, S., Wu, C., Peng, X.: Smil: Multimodal learning with severely missing modality. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2021)

2021
[9]

Proceed- ings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (2020)

Rahman, W., Hasan, M.K., Lee, S., Zadeh, A.B., Mao, C., Morency, L.P., Hoque, E.: Integrating multimodal information in large pretrained transformers. Proceed- ings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (2020)

2020
[10]

why should i trust you?

Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C.: “why should i trust you?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (2016)

2016
[11]

Nature Machine Intelligence (2019)

Rudin, C.: Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence (2019)

2019
[12]

Computers and Electrical Engineering (2024) 10 R

Sadeghi, Z., Alizadehsani, R., Cifci, M.A., Kausar, S., Rehman, R., Mahanta, P., Bora, P.K., Almasri, A., Alkhawaldeh, R.S., Hussain, S., et al.: A review of ex- plainable artificial intelligence in healthcare. Computers and Electrical Engineering (2024) 10 R. Yan et al

2024
[13]

The Lancet (2021)

Scheltens, P., De Strooper, B., Kivipelto, M., Holstege, H., Chételat, G., Teunissen, C.E., Cummings, J., van der Flier, W.M.: Alzheimer’s disease. The Lancet (2021)

2021
[14]

Pro- ceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (2017)

Selvaraju, R.R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., Batra, D.: Grad- cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Pro- ceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (2017)

2017
[15]

NeuroImage (2014)

Suk, H.I., Lee, S.W., Shen, D., Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Hi- erarchical feature representation and multimodal fusion with deep learning for ad/mci diagnosis. NeuroImage (2014)

2014
[16]

International Conference on Machine Learning (2017)

Sundararajan, M., Taly, A., Yan, Q.: Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. International Conference on Machine Learning (2017)

2017
[17]

Interna- tional Conference on Learning Representations (2021)

Sutter, T.M., Daunhawer, I., Vogt, J.E.: Generalized multimodal elbo. Interna- tional Conference on Learning Representations (2021)

2021
[18]

Machine learning for healthcare conference (2019)

Tonekaboni,S.,Joshi,S.,McCradden,M.D.,Goldenberg,A.:Whatclinicianswant: contextualizing explainable machine learning for clinical end use. Machine learning for healthcare conference (2019)

2019
[19]

Scientific Reports (2021)

Venugopalan, J., Tong, L., Hassanzadeh, H.R., Wang, M.D.: Multimodal deep learning models for early detection of alzheimer’s disease stage. Scientific Reports (2021)

2021
[20]

Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (2018)

Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Russell, C.: Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (2018)

2018
[21]

Alzheimer’s & Dementia (2013)

Weiner, M.W., Veitch, D.P., Aisen, P.S., Beckett, L.A., Cairns, N.J., Green, R.C., Harvey, D., Jack, C.R., Jagust, W., Liu, E., et al.: The alzheimer’s disease neu- roimaging initiative: A review of papers published since its inception. Alzheimer’s & Dementia (2013)

2013
[22]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2018)

Wu, M., Goodman, N.D.: Multimodal generative models for scalable weakly- supervised learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2018)

2018
[23]

Deep multimodal learning with missing modality: A survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07825, 2024a

Wu, R., Wang, H., Chen, H.T., Carneiro, G.: Deep multimodal learning with miss- ing modality: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07825 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2024)

Yun, S., Choi, I., Peng, J., Wu, Y., Bao, J., Zhang, Q., Xin, J., Long, Q., Chen, T.: Flex-moe: Modeling arbitrary modality combination via the flexible mixture- of-experts. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2024)

2024
[25]

Systems Science & Control Engineering (2025)

Zhan, Y., Yang, R., You, J., Huang, M., Liu, W., Liu, X.: A systematic literature review on incomplete multimodal learning: techniques and challenges. Systems Science & Control Engineering (2025)

2025
[26]

Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2022)

Zhang, C., Chu, X., Ma, L., Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Zhao, J.: M3care: Learning with missing modalities in multimodal healthcare data. Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2022)

2022
[27]

NeuroImage (2011)

Zhang, D., Wang, Y., Zhou, L., Yuan, H., Shen, D., Initiative, A.D.N., et al.: Multimodal classification of alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. NeuroImage (2011)

2011