pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17479 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Quantum higher-spin Hall insulators

Takuto Kawakami , Igor Kuzmenko , Yshai Avishai , Yigal Meir , Masatoshi Sato This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords quantum spin Hall insulatorshigher spinhelical edge modesmirror Chern numbersgeneralized Dirac fermionnonlinear transporttopological insulatorsultracold atoms
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum spin Hall insulators with arbitrary spin J support J + 1/2 pairs of helical edge modes protected by mirror Chern numbers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a theory of quantum spin Hall insulators generalized from spin 1/2 to arbitrary total spin J. It shows that these systems host exactly J plus one-half pairs of counter-propagating helical edge modes, topologically protected by a mirror Chern number. The edge states obey a generalized Dirac equation whose dispersion includes higher powers of momentum, which produces electric currents that scale nonlinearly with applied voltage. An in-plane magnetic field opens a gap at the edges, while magnetic domain walls bind (J + 1/2)-fold degenerate states classified by winding numbers. The framework suggests that such phases can be realized in ultracold atomic gases with engineered spin.

Core claim

Our analysis demonstrates that such systems support J+1/2 pairs of helical edge modes protected by nontrivial mirror Chern numbers. The corresponding edge theory is described by a generalized Dirac fermion with higher-order dispersion. These modes produce unique transport responses that are non-linear with voltage. An in-plane magnetic field opens a mass gap in the edge spectrum, and magnetic domain walls host (J+1/2)-fold degenerate bound states characterized by nontrivial winding numbers. Our results extend quantum spin Hall physics to higher-spin systems and suggest possible realizations in ultracold atomic gases.

What carries the argument

Mirror Chern numbers for arbitrary spin J that protect J + 1/2 pairs of helical edge modes, together with the generalized Dirac fermion description that incorporates higher-order momentum dispersion.

If this is right

  • Exactly J + 1/2 pairs of helical edge modes appear for each value of spin J.
  • Edge transport currents scale nonlinearly with voltage because of the higher-order terms in the Dirac dispersion.
  • An in-plane magnetic field gaps the edge spectrum while domain walls bind (J + 1/2)-fold degenerate states with nontrivial winding numbers.
  • The construction extends the quantum spin Hall paradigm beyond spin 1/2.
  • Ultracold atomic gases are proposed as a platform for experimental realization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Measuring the exact multiplicity of edge modes or the nonlinear I-V curve in an engineered higher-spin system would directly test the mirror Chern number protection.
  • The higher degeneracy of domain-wall states may enable multi-channel topological transport not available in conventional spin-1/2 quantum spin Hall edges.
  • If interactions become strong, additional gaps could open at the edges, requiring separate stability analysis beyond the non-interacting model used here.

Load-bearing premise

Higher-spin systems admit an effective non-interacting or weakly interacting description preserving mirror symmetry in which the generalized Dirac edge states remain gapless and stable.

What would settle it

Observation of a number of helical edge modes different from J + 1/2, or strictly linear rather than nonlinear voltage dependence in the edge transport, in a candidate higher-spin quantum spin Hall system would contradict the claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17479 by Igor Kuzmenko, Masatoshi Sato, Takuto Kawakami, Yigal Meir, Yshai Avishai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Geometry (left) and energy spectrum (right three columns for spin 1/2, 3/2, and 5/2) of the ribbon structure under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Numerically evaluated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Patch of domains in momentum space to calculate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Schematic plot of dispersion relation for the bulk in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The same plot as Fig. 1(a), but with an extended range of spins, up to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a theory of quantum spin Hall insulators with arbitrary spin $J$. Our analysis demonstrates that such systems support $J+\tfrac{1}{2}$ pairs of helical edge modes protected by nontrivial mirror Chern numbers. We establish that the corresponding edge theory is described by a generalized Dirac fermion with higher-order dispersion. These modes produce unique transport responses that are non-linear with voltage. An in-plane magnetic field opens a mass gap in the edge spectrum, and magnetic domain walls host $(J+\tfrac{1}{2})$-fold degenerate bound states characterized by nontrivial winding numbers. Our results extend quantum spin Hall physics to higher-spin systems and suggest possible realizations in ultracold atomic gases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theory of quantum spin Hall insulators generalized to arbitrary spin J. It claims that such systems support J + 1/2 pairs of helical edge modes protected by nontrivial mirror Chern numbers, with the corresponding edge theory described by a generalized Dirac fermion exhibiting higher-order dispersion. This leads to nonlinear voltage-dependent transport responses. An in-plane magnetic field opens a mass gap in the edge spectrum, while magnetic domain walls host (J + 1/2)-fold degenerate bound states characterized by nontrivial winding numbers. Possible realizations in ultracold atomic gases are suggested.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work extends the quantum spin Hall effect to higher-spin representations, introducing novel features such as higher-order dispersion in the edge theory and associated nonlinear transport. The use of mirror Chern numbers for protection and the analysis of magnetic perturbations and domain-wall states provide a systematic generalization of topological band theory. The proposed realizations in ultracold atoms offer a concrete experimental direction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on bulk topology and mirror Chern numbers] The bulk Hamiltonian in the (2J+1)-dimensional spin-J representation and the subsequent computation of mirror Chern numbers (leading to the claimed magnitude J + 1/2) require an explicit step-by-step derivation; without this, it is difficult to verify that the occupied bands indeed produce the stated number of protected edge modes via bulk-boundary correspondence.
  2. [Edge theory and dispersion analysis] The edge theory section should demonstrate explicitly that symmetry-allowed perturbations do not gap the higher-order Dirac crossings for general J; the current treatment appears to rely on the standard mirror symmetry protection without checking higher-order terms that could arise for J > 1/2.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the explicit form of the generalized Dirac Hamiltonian to clarify the higher-order dispersion.
  2. [Magnetic domain wall analysis] Notation for the winding numbers of the domain-wall bound states should be defined consistently with the edge theory dispersion relation.
  3. Additional references to existing literature on mirror Chern numbers in spinful systems and higher-spin topological phases would help contextualize the novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which will help improve the clarity of our presentation. We agree that additional explicit derivations will strengthen the paper and have revised the manuscript accordingly. Below we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section on bulk topology and mirror Chern numbers] The bulk Hamiltonian in the (2J+1)-dimensional spin-J representation and the subsequent computation of mirror Chern numbers (leading to the claimed magnitude J + 1/2) require an explicit step-by-step derivation; without this, it is difficult to verify that the occupied bands indeed produce the stated number of protected edge modes via bulk-boundary correspondence.

    Authors: We agree that a more detailed derivation will aid verification. In the revised manuscript we expand Section II to include a complete step-by-step calculation: we first write the (2J+1)-dimensional Hamiltonian in the spin-J basis, apply the mirror operator M_z whose eigenvalues label the bands, integrate the Berry curvature over the half Brillouin zone for each mirror sector, and explicitly obtain the mirror Chern number C_M = J + 1/2 for the occupied bands. We then invoke the bulk-boundary correspondence to confirm the resulting J + 1/2 pairs of helical edge modes. These steps are now written out for arbitrary J. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Edge theory and dispersion analysis] The edge theory section should demonstrate explicitly that symmetry-allowed perturbations do not gap the higher-order Dirac crossings for general J; the current treatment appears to rely on the standard mirror symmetry protection without checking higher-order terms that could arise for J > 1/2.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. In the revised Section III we add an explicit analysis of symmetry-allowed perturbations for general J. Starting from the generalized Dirac Hamiltonian with higher-order dispersion, we enumerate all possible local terms up to the relevant order that are consistent with mirror symmetry, time-reversal symmetry, and charge conservation. We show that any term capable of opening a gap at the higher-order crossings is forbidden by the mirror eigenvalue structure, which remains nontrivial for arbitrary J. This explicit check confirms that the crossings are protected beyond the J = 1/2 case. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from a bulk Hamiltonian in the (2J+1)-dimensional spin-J representation, computation of mirror Chern numbers on occupied bands, and application of standard bulk-boundary correspondence to obtain J+1/2 helical edge pairs. The edge theory is obtained by projecting the bulk dispersion onto the mirror-invariant plane and reducing to a generalized Dirac Hamiltonian whose higher-order terms are fixed by symmetry. These steps rely on independently verifiable topological invariants and symmetry constraints rather than self-referential definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The non-interacting assumption is the conventional starting point for band-theory proposals and does not create a circular loop within the paper's own equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The theory rests on standard topological assumptions and domain-specific modeling choices for higher-spin systems; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Mirror symmetry is present and allows definition of mirror Chern numbers that protect the edge modes
    Invoked to establish nontrivial topology and mode protection for arbitrary J.
  • domain assumption The edge states admit a description as a generalized Dirac fermion with higher-order dispersion
    Used to derive the nonlinear transport response and gap opening under magnetic field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5417 in / 1407 out tokens · 41688 ms · 2026-05-10T05:33:21.823947+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Quantum higher-spin Hall insulators

    spin Hall response. Finally, we demonstrate that applying an in-plane Zee- man field gaps the edge spectrum. At domain walls be- tween regions with opposite Zeeman fields, (J+ 1 2)-fold degenerate bound states appear. The number of domain- wall states is determined by the winding number of the effective edge Hamiltonian. Quantum higher-spin Hall insulator...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    D. L. Bergman, R. Shindou, G. A. Fiete, and L. Balents, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 097207 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    T. H. Hsieh, J. Liu, and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. B90, 081112 (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    P. M. R. Brydon, L. Wang, M. Weinert, and D. F. Agter- berg, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 177001 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    Agterberg, P

    D. Agterberg, P. Brydon, and C. Timm, Physical review letters118, 127001 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    C. Timm, A. P. Schnyder, D. F. Agterberg, and P. M. R. Brydon, Phys. Rev. B96, 094526 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi, S. Davis, and M. S. Foster, Phys. Rev. B95, 144503 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Savary, J

    L. Savary, J. Ruhman, J. W. F. Venderbos, L. Fu, and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B96, 214514 (2017)

    2017

  9. [9]

    W. Yang, T. Xiang, and C. Wu, Physical Review B96, 144514 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    J. W. F. Venderbos, L. Savary, J. Ruhman, P. A. Lee, and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. X8, 011029 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    P. M. R. Brydon, D. F. Agterberg, H. Menke, and C. Timm, Phys. Rev. B98, 224509 (2018)

    2018

  12. [12]

    Yu and C.-X

    J. Yu and C.-X. Liu, Phys. Rev. B98, 104514 (2018)

    2018

  13. [13]

    Kobayashi, A

    S. Kobayashi, A. Yamakage, Y. Tanaka, and M. Sato, Physical Review Letters123, 097002 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    B. Roy, S. A. A. Ghorashi, M. S. Foster, and A. H. Nev- idomskyy, Phys. Rev. B99, 054505 (2019)

    2019

  15. [15]

    Menke, C

    H. Menke, C. Timm, and P. Brydon, Physical Review B 100, 224505 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Kobayashi and A

    S. Kobayashi and A. Furusaki, Phys. Rev. B102, 180505 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    Tchoumakov, L

    S. Tchoumakov, L. J. Godbout, and W. Witczak- Krempa, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013230 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    A. L. Szab´ o, R. Moessner, and B. Roy, Phys. Rev. B103, 165139 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Dutta, F

    P. Dutta, F. Parhizgar, and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033255 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    H. Kim, M. A. Tanatar, H. Hodovanets, K. Wang, J. Paglione, and R. Prozorov, Phys. Rev. B104, 014510 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    D. Kim, S. Kobayashi, and Y. Asano, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan90, 104708 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    Timm and A

    C. Timm and A. Bhattacharya, Physical Review B104, 094529 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    C. Timm, P. Brydon, and D. F. Agterberg, Physical Re- view B103, 024521 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    H. Kim, J. Lee, H. Hodovanets, K. Wang, J. D. Sau, and J. Paglione, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033169 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Kobayashi, A

    S. Kobayashi, A. Bhattacharya, C. Timm, and P. Bry- don, Physical Review B105, 134507 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    T. Sato, S. Kobayashi, and Y. Asano, Physical Review B 110, 144503 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Ohashi, S

    R. Ohashi, S. Kobayashi, S. Kanazawa, Y. Tanaka, and Y. Kawaguchi, Physical Review B110, 104515 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    T. Mori, H. Watanabe, and H. Ikeda, Journal of the Phys- ical Society of Japan94, 023704 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Oudah, A

    M. Oudah, A. Ikeda, J. N. Hausmann, S. Yonezawa, T. Fukumoto, S. Kobayashi, M. Sato, and Y. Maeno, Nature communications7, 13617 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    Kawakami, T

    T. Kawakami, T. Okamura, S. Kobayashi, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. X8, 041026 (2018)

    2018

  31. [31]

    Ikeda, S

    A. Ikeda, S. Koibuchi, S. Kitao, M. Oudah, S. Yonezawa, M. Seto, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. B100, 245145 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    Fang and L

    C. Fang and L. Fu, Science Advances5, eaat2374 (2019), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aat2374

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat2374 2019

  33. [33]

    Ikeda, Z

    A. Ikeda, Z. Guguchia, M. Oudah, S. Koibuchi, S. Yonezawa, D. Das, T. Shiroka, H. Luetkens, and Y. Maeno, Phys. Rev. B101, 174503 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    Boettcher, Phys

    I. Boettcher, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 127602 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    J. M. Link, I. Boettcher, and I. F. Herbut, Phys. Rev. B 101, 184503 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    Kobayashi, Y

    S. Kobayashi, Y. Yamazaki, A. Yamakage, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. B103, 224504 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Mandal and B

    S. Mandal and B. Roy, Phys. Rev. B107, L180502 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Bhattacharya and C

    A. Bhattacharya and C. Timm, Phys. Rev. B107, L220501 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  40. [40]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  41. [41]

    Tanaka, M

    Y. Tanaka, M. Sato, and N. Nagaosa, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan81, 011013 (2011)

    2011

  42. [42]

    Y. Ando, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.82, 102001 (2013)

    2013

  43. [43]

    Ando and L

    Y. Ando and L. Fu, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 361 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    Mizushima, Y

    T. Mizushima, Y. Tsutsumi, T. Kawakami, M. Sato, M. Ichioka, and K. Machida, journal of the physical so- ciety of japan85, 022001 (2016)

    2016

  45. [45]

    Sato and S

    M. Sato and S. Fujimoto, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan85, 072001 (2016)

    2016

  46. [46]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y. Ando, Reports on Progress in Physics 80, 076501 (2017)

    2017

  47. [47]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Re- views of Modern Physics88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  48. [48]

    Kariyado and M

    T. Kariyado and M. Ogata, Journal of the Physical So- ciety of Japan80, 083704 (2011)

    2011

  49. [49]

    Kariyado and M

    T. Kariyado and M. Ogata, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan81, 064701 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.81.064701

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.81.064701 2012

  50. [50]

    N. R. Cooper, J. Dalibard, and I. B. Spielman, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015005 (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    Jaksch and P

    D. Jaksch and P. Zoller, New Journal of Physics5, 56 (2003)

    2003

  52. [52]

    Osterloh, M

    K. Osterloh, M. Baig, L. Santos, P. Zoller, and M. Lewen- stein, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 010403 (2005)

    2005

  53. [53]

    Raghu, X.-L

    S. Raghu, X.-L. Qi, C. Honerkamp, and S.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 156401 (2008)

    2008

  54. [54]

    R. O. Umucal ılar, H. Zhai, and M. O. Oktel, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 070402 (2008). 11

    2008

  55. [55]

    L. B. Shao, S.-L. Zhu, L. Sheng, D. Y. Xing, and Z. D. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 246810 (2008)

    2008

  56. [56]

    Wu, Phys

    C. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 186807 (2008)

    2008

  57. [57]

    M. Sato, Y. Takahashi, and S. Fujimoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 020401 (2009)

    2009

  58. [58]

    M. Sato, Y. Takahashi, and S. Fujimoto, Phys. Rev. B 82, 134521 (2010)

    2010

  59. [59]

    Goldman, I

    N. Goldman, I. Satija, P. Nikolic, A. Bermudez, M. A. Martin-Delgado, M. Lewenstein, and I. B. Spielman, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 255302 (2010)

    2010

  60. [60]

    Jiang, T

    L. Jiang, T. Kitagawa, J. Alicea, A. R. Akhmerov, D. Pekker, G. Refael, J. I. Cirac, E. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 220402 (2011)

    2011

  61. [61]

    Goldman, F

    N. Goldman, F. Gerbier, and M. Lewenstein, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics46, 134010 (2013)

    2013

  62. [62]

    M. C. Beeler, R. A. Williams, K. Jimenez-Garcia, L. J. LeBlanc, A. R. Perry, and I. B. Spielman, Nature498, 201 (2013)

    2013

  63. [63]

    C. J. Kennedy, G. A. Siviloglou, H. Miyake, W. C. Bur- ton, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 225301 (2013)

    2013

  64. [64]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes, and I. Bloch, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 185301 (2013)

    2013

  65. [65]

    Cao, S.-H

    Y. Cao, S.-H. Zou, X.-J. Liu, S. Yi, G.-L. Long, and H. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 115302 (2014)

    2014

  66. [66]

    L. Duca, T. Li, M. Reitter, I. Bloch, M. Schleier-Smith, and U. Schneider, Science347, 288 (2015)

    2015

  67. [67]

    R. Li, H. Ma, X. Cheng, S. Wang, D. Li, Z. Zhang, Y. Li, and X.-Q. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 096401 (2016)

    2016

  68. [68]

    Grusdt, T

    F. Grusdt, T. Li, I. Bloch, and E. Demler, Phys. Rev. A 95, 063617 (2017)

    2017

  69. [69]

    C. Zeng, T. D. Stanescu, C. Zhang, V. W. Scarola, and S. Tewari, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 060402 (2019)

    2019

  70. [70]

    Zhang, Y.-Q

    D.-W. Zhang, Y.-Q. Zhu, Y. Zhao, H. Yan, and S.-L. Zhu, Advances in Physics67, 253 (2018)

    2018

  71. [71]

    Zhang, C.-R

    J.-Y. Zhang, C.-R. Yi, L. Zhang, R.-H. Jiao, K.-Y. Shi, H. Yuan, W. Zhang, X.-J. Liu, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 043201 (2023)

    2023

  72. [72]

    Dalibard, F

    J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and P. ¨Ohberg, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1523 (2011)

    2011

  73. [73]

    Zhai, Reports on Progress in Physics78, 026001 (2015)

    H. Zhai, Reports on Progress in Physics78, 026001 (2015)

    2015

  74. [74]

    Ruseckas, G

    J. Ruseckas, G. Juzeli¯ unas, P. ¨Ohberg, and M. Fleis- chhauer, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 010404 (2005)

    2005

  75. [75]

    Juzeli¯ unas, J

    G. Juzeli¯ unas, J. Ruseckas, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. A81, 053403 (2010)

    2010

  76. [76]

    Y.-J. Lin, K. Jim´ enez-Garc´ ıa, and I. B. Spielman, Nature 471, 83 (2011)

    2011

  77. [77]

    D. L. Campbell, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and I. B. Spielman, Phys. Rev. A84, 025602 (2011)

    2011

  78. [78]

    B. M. Anderson, G. Juzeli¯ unas, V. M. Galitski, and I. B. Spielman, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 235301 (2012)

    2012

  79. [79]

    Z. Wu, L. Zhang, W. Sun, X.-T. Xu, B.-Z. Wang, S.-C. Ji, Y. Deng, S. Chen, X.-J. Liu, and J.-W. Pan, Science 354, 83 (2016)

    2016

  80. [80]

    Huang, Z

    L. Huang, Z. Meng, P. Wang, P. Peng, S.-L. Zhang, L. Chen, D. Li, Q. Zhou, and J. Zhang, Nature Physics 12, 540 (2016)

    2016

Showing first 80 references.