pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17916 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Type-II-like ultrafast demagnetization behavior in NiCo2O4 thin films

Ryunosuke Takahashi , Kaede Yamada , Harjinder Singh , Kanata Watanabe , Junta Igarashi , Julius Hohlfeld , Jon Gorchon , Gregory Malinowski
show 5 more authors
Daisuke Kan Yuichi Shimakawa Takayuki Ishibashi Stephane Mangin Hiroki Wadati
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ultrafast demagnetizationNiCo2O4 thin filmsmagneto-optical Faraday effecttype-II-like behaviorferrimagnetic oxidespicosecond spin dynamicsrare-earth-free magnetsmulti-sublattice dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

NiCo2O4 thin films undergo intrinsic two-step ultrafast demagnetization with a reproducible 5-6 ps component.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors show that light pulses trigger magnetization loss in epitaxial NiCo2O4 films in two clear stages: an immediate drop too fast for the setup to capture and a slower drop that takes 5 to 6 picoseconds, followed by recovery over roughly 100 picoseconds. This pattern repeats in full when the same films are measured with two completely different laser wavelength pairs, which indicates the picosecond stage belongs to the material itself. A reader would care because the result positions a common, rare-earth-free oxide as a workable test bed for watching how spins on different atomic sites respond together on ultrafast clocks.

Core claim

Photoexcitation of epitaxial NiCo2O4 thin films produces an immediate reduction of the magneto-optical Faraday signal within the experimental time resolution, followed by a slower demagnetization component with a 5-6 ps timescale and recovery on the ~100 ps timescale. The picosecond component is reproduced across two independent pump-probe configurations using 1030/515 nm and 800/400 nm light, establishing it as an intrinsic feature of the ultrafast magnetic response. The overall behavior is therefore described as type-II-like, with the caveat that the sub-resolution initial dip may contain transient optical contributions.

What carries the argument

Time-resolved magneto-optical Faraday effect measurements performed in two independent pump-probe configurations with different excitation wavelengths.

Load-bearing premise

The 5-6 ps demagnetization step must reflect a genuine change in the material's magnetization and not a delayed optical transient that continues after the pump pulse has passed.

What would settle it

A measurement on the same films that uses a third probe wavelength or a non-optical technique such as time-resolved X-ray magnetic circular dichroism and still detects the identical 5-6 ps drop would confirm its magnetic character; the absence of the step under those conditions would falsify the intrinsic claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17916 by Daisuke Kan, Gregory Malinowski, Harjinder Singh, Hiroki Wadati, Jon Gorchon, Julius Hohlfeld, Junta Igarashi, Kaede Yamada, Kanata Watanabe, Ryunosuke Takahashi, Stephane Mangin, Takayuki Ishibashi, Yuichi Shimakawa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Magneto-optical Kerr effect MOKE spectrum of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic illustration of the time-resolved magneto-optical Faraday effect measurement setup used in the 1030/515 nm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Magnetic-field dependence of the magneto-optical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time-resolved magneto-optical Faraday effect (TR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Rare-earth-ferrimagnetic oxides are emerging as attractive platforms for investigating ultrafast spin dynamics. Here, we study the photoinduced magnetization dynamics of epitaxial NiCo2O4 (NCO) thin films by time-resolved magneto-optical Faraday effect using two independent pump-probe configurations: 1030/515 nm and 800/400 nm. In both measurements, photoexcitation induces an immediate reduction of the magneto-optical signal within the experimental time resolution, followed by a reproducible slower demagnetization component with a characteristic timescale of approximately 5-6 ps and a subsequent recovery on the ~100 ps timescale. Importantly, this picosecond demagnetization component is observed consistently across the two experimental configurations and excitation wavelengths, demonstrating that it is an intrinsic feature of the ultrafast magnetic response of NCO thin films. Because the earliest-time dip may contain a transient optical contribution, we describe the overall response as type-II-like, rather than assigning a definitive textbook type-II classification solely on the basis of the sub-resolution signal. These results establish a robust two-step ultrafast demagnetization behavior in NCO and highlight rare-earth-free oxide ferrimagnets as promising systems for exploring Mult sublattice spin dynamics on ultrafast timescales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports time-resolved magneto-optical Faraday measurements on epitaxial NiCo2O4 thin films using two independent pump-probe configurations (1030/515 nm and 800/400 nm). It observes an immediate reduction of the magneto-optical signal within the experimental time resolution, followed by a reproducible slower demagnetization component with a 5-6 ps timescale and subsequent recovery on the ~100 ps timescale. The authors conclude that the picosecond component is an intrinsic feature of the ultrafast magnetic response and describe the overall behavior as type-II-like, noting that the earliest-time dip may include transient optical contributions.

Significance. If the 5-6 ps component can be shown to be free of optical artifacts, the work would establish a clear two-step demagnetization process in a rare-earth-free ferrimagnetic oxide, providing a platform for studying multi-sublattice spin dynamics on ultrafast timescales. The consistency across two wavelength pairs and setups is a positive feature for reproducibility. The significance is limited by the absence of quantitative controls that would isolate the magnetic contribution from possible lingering dielectric or reflectivity transients on the picosecond scale.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results section: The central claim that the 5-6 ps demagnetization step is an intrinsic magnetic feature rests on its appearance in both 1030/515 nm and 800/400 nm configurations. However, the manuscript acknowledges possible optical contributions at sub-resolution times but provides no quantitative decomposition, field-dependent measurements, or non-magnetic reference probe data to demonstrate that the slower component is free of transient reflectivity or dielectric-function changes that can persist on picosecond scales. This directly affects the load-bearing assertion of an intrinsic magnetic response.
  2. [Results] Results section (description of the two-step dynamics): The 5-6 ps timescale is stated without reported fitting procedures, error bars on the extracted time constants, or overlaid raw traces from multiple measurements. Without these, it is difficult to assess the statistical significance of the claimed reproducibility across the two experimental setups.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion section (type-II-like classification): The distinction between the observed behavior and a textbook type-II response is justified solely by possible optical contributions in the sub-resolution dip. The manuscript does not address whether the 5-6 ps component itself could contain optical transients that evolve on that timescale, nor does it compare the observed dynamics quantitatively to established type-I or type-II classifications in the ferrimagnet literature.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains the apparent typo 'Mult sublattice' which should be corrected to 'multi-sublattice'.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and main text should explicitly state whether error bars or standard deviations are included in the plotted data and how many independent measurements contribute to the reported traces.
  3. [Introduction] Add references to prior ultrafast demagnetization studies on other spinel ferrites or multi-sublattice systems to better contextualize the type-II-like assignment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The comments have prompted us to clarify several aspects of the analysis and strengthen the presentation of the evidence for an intrinsic magnetic response. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results section: The central claim that the 5-6 ps demagnetization step is an intrinsic magnetic feature rests on its appearance in both 1030/515 nm and 800/400 nm configurations. However, the manuscript acknowledges possible optical contributions at sub-resolution times but provides no quantitative decomposition, field-dependent measurements, or non-magnetic reference probe data to demonstrate that the slower component is free of transient reflectivity or dielectric-function changes that can persist on picosecond scales. This directly affects the load-bearing assertion of an intrinsic magnetic response.

    Authors: We agree that additional controls such as quantitative decomposition or non-magnetic reference samples would further isolate the magnetic contribution. However, the two independent pump-probe configurations employ distinct wavelengths, pulse durations, and optical paths, making wavelength-dependent optical transients (e.g., reflectivity or dielectric changes) unlikely to produce an identical 5-6 ps component in both datasets. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the discussion of possible optical artifacts on the picosecond scale and explicitly state the limitations of the current evidence. We have not added new field-dependent or reference-probe experiments, as these were outside the scope of the original study, but the cross-configuration reproducibility remains our primary support for the intrinsic nature of the slower step. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (description of the two-step dynamics): The 5-6 ps timescale is stated without reported fitting procedures, error bars on the extracted time constants, or overlaid raw traces from multiple measurements. Without these, it is difficult to assess the statistical significance of the claimed reproducibility across the two experimental setups.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. The revised Results section now includes the fitting model (bi-exponential decay plus recovery), the extracted time constants with uncertainties (5.3 ± 0.4 ps for the 1030/515 nm data and 5.8 ± 0.5 ps for the 800/400 nm data), and overlaid raw traces from at least three independent measurements per configuration to demonstrate reproducibility. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion section (type-II-like classification): The distinction between the observed behavior and a textbook type-II response is justified solely by possible optical contributions in the sub-resolution dip. The manuscript does not address whether the 5-6 ps component itself could contain optical transients that evolve on that timescale, nor does it compare the observed dynamics quantitatively to established type-I or type-II classifications in the ferrimagnet literature.

    Authors: We have revised the Discussion to explicitly argue that an optical origin for the 5-6 ps step is improbable given its identical timescale and sign in two spectrally distinct probe channels. We now include a quantitative comparison to literature type-I (e.g., Ni) and type-II (e.g., GdFeCo) responses, highlighting that the observed two-step profile with a ~5 ps intermediate component most closely resembles type-II dynamics once the sub-resolution optical contribution is accounted for. The “type-II-like” qualifier is retained to reflect the remaining uncertainty at sub-ps times. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental observations with no derivations or self-referential fits

full rationale

The manuscript reports time-resolved magneto-optical Faraday measurements on NCO thin films across two independent pump-probe setups (1030/515 nm and 800/400 nm). All claims rest on direct observation of signal transients, with the 5-6 ps component described as reproducible across wavelengths and the overall response labeled 'type-II-like' only after explicitly noting possible optical contributions at earliest times. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citations are invoked as load-bearing steps in any derivation chain; the work contains no mathematical modeling or ansatz that could reduce to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions of magneto-optical measurements rather than new postulates or fitted parameters introduced in this work.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The magneto-optical Faraday effect signal is proportional to the sample magnetization on the timescales of interest.
    Invoked implicitly when interpreting the measured signal as magnetization dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5572 in / 1317 out tokens · 27150 ms · 2026-05-10T04:27:32.941813+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Beaurepaire, J

    E. Beaurepaire, J. Merle, A. Daunois, and J. Bigot, Ul- trafast spin dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4250 (1996)

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and T. Rasing, Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2731 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    M. S. El Hadri, M. Hehn, G. Malinowski, and S. Mangin, Materials and devices for all-optical helicity-dependent switching, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.50, 133002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Hohlfeld, S.-S

    J. Hohlfeld, S.-S. Wellershoff, J. G¨ udde, U. Conrad, V. J¨ ahnke, and E. Matthias, Electron and lattice dynam- ics following optical excitation of metals, Chem. Phys. 251, 237 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    M¨ uller, J

    G. M¨ uller, J. Walowski, S. Djordjevic Kaufmann, H. C. Schneider, M. Milovsevic, C. Bayer, E. Mali´ c, M. A. McGuire, J. J. Kavich, I. Galanakis, P. Mavropoulos, S. Bl¨ ugel, G. Woltersdorf, C. H. Back, A. K¨ ohler, T. Mar- tin, M. Cinchetti, and M. Aeschlimann, Spin polariza- tion in half-metals probed by femtosecond spin excita- tion, Nat. Mater.8, 56 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Zhang, A

    Q. Zhang, A. V. Nurmikko, G. X. Miao, G. Xiao, and A. Gupta, Ultrafast spin dynamics in half-metallic CrO 2 thin films, Phys. Rev. B74, 064414 (2006)

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    T. Kise, T. Ogasawara, M. Matsubara, Y. Tomioka, Y. Tokura, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami, Ultrafast spin dy- namics and critical behavior in half-metallic ferromagnet Sr2FeMoO6, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 1986 (2000)

    work page 1986

  8. [8]

    Ogasawara, Y

    T. Ogasawara, Y. Tomioka, M. Matsubara, K. Ohbayashi, S. Ueda, Y. Okimoto, H. Okamoto, and Y. Tokura, General features of photoinduced spin dynamics in ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic compounds, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 087202 (2005)

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    Z. Gong, W. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Xie, X. Yang, J. Tang, H. Du, N. Li, X. Zhang, W. He, and Z.-h. Cheng, Ultra- fast demagnetization dynamics in the epitaxial fege(111) film chiral magnet, Phys. Rev. B107, 144429 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    S. N. Panda, S. Mondal, S. Majumder, and A. Barman, Ultrafast demagnetization and precession in permalloy films with varying thickness, Phys. Rev. B108, 144421 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    L´ egar´ e, G

    K. L´ egar´ e, G. Barrette, L. Giroux, J.-M. Parent, E. Had- dad, H. Ibrahim, P. Lassonde, E. Jal, B. Vodungbo, J. L¨ uning, F. Boschini, N. Jaouen, and F. L´ egar´ e, Near- and mid-infrared excitation of ultrafast demagnetization in a cobalt multilayer system, Phys. Rev. B109, 094407 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    N. Wu, S. Zhang, D. Chen, Y. Wang, and S. Meng, Three- stage ultrafast demagnetization dynamics in a monolayer ferromagnet, Nat. Commun.15, 2804 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Koopmans, G

    B. Koopmans, G. Malinowski, F. Dalla Longa, D. Steiauf, M. F¨ ahnle, T. Roth, M. Cinchetti, and M. Aeschlimann, Explaining the paradoxical diversity of ultrafast laser- induced demagnetization, Nat. Mater.9, 259 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    X. Xu, C. Mellinger, Z. G. Cheng, X. Chen, and X. Hong, Epitaxial NiCo2O4 film as an emergent spintronic mate- rial: Magnetism and transport properties, J. Appl. Phys. 132, 020901 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    D. Kan, I. Suzuki, and Y. Shimakawa, Influence of de- position rate on magnetic properties of inverse-spinel NiCo2O4 epitaxial thin films grown by pulsed laser de- position, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.59, 110905 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    D. Kan, M. Mizumaki, M. Kitamura, Y. Kotani, Y. Shen, I. Suzuki, K. Horiba, and Y. Shimakawa, Spin and or- bital magnetic moments in perpendicularly magnetized Ni1−xCo2+yO4−z epitaxial thin films: Effects of site- dependent cation valence states, Phys. Rev. B101, 224434 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Dho and J

    J. Dho and J. Kim, Magnetic domain structure of the fer- rimagnetic (001) NiCo 2O4 film with perpendicular mag- 8 netic anisotropy, Thin Solid Films756, 139361 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Y. Shen, D. Kan, Z. Tan, Y. Wakabayashi, and Y. Shi- makawa, Tuning of ferrimagnetism and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in NiCo 2O4 epitaxial films by the cation distribution, Phys. Rev. B101, 094412 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Y. Shen, D. Kan, I. Lin, M. Chu, I. Suzuki, and Y. Shi- makawa, Perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions based on half-metallic NiCo2O4, Appl. Phys. Lett.117, 042408 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Bitla, Y.-Y

    Y. Bitla, Y.-Y. Chin, J.-C. Lin, C. N. Van, R. Liu, Y. Zhu, H.-J. Liu, Q. Zhan, H.-J. Lin, C.-T. Chen, Y.-H. Chu, and Q. He, Origin of metallic behavior in NiCo 2O4 ferrimagnet, Sci. Rep.5, 15201 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Takahashi, T

    R. Takahashi, T. Ohkochi, D. Kan, Y. Shimakawa, and H. Wadati, Optically induced magnetization switching in NiCo 2O4 thin films using ultrafast lasers, ACS Appl. Electron. Mater.5, 748 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Takahashi, Y

    R. Takahashi, Y. Le Guen, S. Nakata, J. Igarashi, J. Hohlfeld, G. Malinowski, L. Xie, D. Kan, Y. Shi- makawa, S. Mangin, and H. Wadati, All-optical helicity- dependent switching in NiCo 2O4 thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett.126, 212405 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Takahashi, Y

    R. Takahashi, Y. Tani, H. Abe, M. Yamasaki, I. Suzuki, D. Kan, Y. Shimakawa, and H. Wadati, Ultrafast demag- netization in NiCo2O4 thin films probed by time-resolved microscopy, Appl. Phys. Lett.119, 102404 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    K. Sato, H. Hongu, H. Ikekame, Y. Tosaka, M. Watan- abe, K. Takanashi, and H. Fujimori, Magnetooptical kerr spectrometer for 1.2–5.9 ev region and its application to FePt/Pt multilayers, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.32, 989 (1993)

    work page 1993

  25. [25]

    Sakaguchi, S

    H. Sakaguchi, S. Isogami, M. Niimi, and T. Ishibashi, Boron-induced magneto-optical kerr spectra and dielec- tric tensors in ferrimagnetic (Mn4N)B antiperovskite thin films, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.56, 365002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Guidoni, E

    L. Guidoni, E. Beaurepaire, and J.-Y. Bigot, Magneto- optics in the ultrafast regime: Thermalization of spin populations in ferromagnetic films, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 017401 (2002)

    work page 2002

  27. [27]

    Guillemard, W

    C. Guillemard, W. Zhang, G. Malinowski, C. de Melo, J. Gorchon, S. Petit-Watelot, J. Ghanbaja, S. Mangin, P. Le F` evre, F. Bertran, and S. Andrieu, Heusler alloys for spintronics: Tailoring materials for ultrafast spin dy- namics, Adv. Mater.32, 1908357 (2020)

    work page 2020