Recognition: unknown
Explicit Factorization of x^{p+1}-1 over mathbb{Z}_{p^e}: A Structural Approach via Dickson Polynomials
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:10 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The factorization of x^{p+1}-1 over Z_{p^e} reduces to the roots of an auxiliary polynomial V(x) whose structure is given by Dickson polynomials.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We establish a structural isomorphism between the lifting process and the roots of a special auxiliary polynomial V(x), unveiling a deterministic link to Dickson polynomials. Based on this theory, we develop Dickson-Engine, a linear-time algorithm (O(ep)) that outperforms standard libraries by orders of magnitude. Applying this engine to Z_169, we explicitly construct a family of classical LCD codes of length n=182 via the isometric Gray map, obtaining parameters near the Griesmer bound together with a robustness plateau in minimum distance.
What carries the argument
The auxiliary polynomial V(x) whose roots determine the lifted factors from Z_p to Z_{p^e} via their connection to Dickson polynomials.
If this is right
- Factorizations of x^{p+1}-1 over Z_{p^e} can be obtained deterministically in O(e p) time via the Dickson-Engine algorithm.
- Near-optimal LCD codes of length 182 over Z_169 exist with parameters such as [182,1,168]_13 and [182,2,144]_13 relative to the Griesmer bound.
- A robustness plateau occurs for these codes in which minimum distance remains fixed at 120 while dimension increases from 4 to 12.
- The resulting codes supply resources for post-quantum cryptography and for entanglement-free quantum error correction.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same structural link between an auxiliary polynomial and Dickson polynomials may supply closed-form lifts for other cyclotomic polynomials over p-adic rings.
- Bypassing iterative Hensel lifting suggests that Dickson polynomials already encode the full lifting data, which could simplify factorization algorithms for additional classes of polynomials.
- The explicit factorizations enable systematic searches for Hermitian-symmetric codes whose parameters can be checked directly against known bounds.
Load-bearing premise
The complete lifting of factorizations from Z_p to Z_{p^e} is captured exactly by the roots of the auxiliary polynomial V(x) without hidden dependencies on generic Hensel lifting.
What would settle it
Compute the actual lifted irreducible factors of x^{p+1}-1 over Z_{p^2} for p=3 or p=5 by direct division or standard Hensel iteration and compare them to the factors predicted from the roots of V(x); any mismatch falsifies the isomorphism.
Figures
read the original abstract
Let $p$ be an odd prime. The factorization of the polynomial $x^{p+1}-1$ over the integer residue ring $\mathbb{Z}_{p^e}$ is pivotal for constructing cyclic codes with Hermitian symmetry, a critical resource for Linear Complementary Dual (LCD) codes and Entanglement-Assisted Quantum Error-Correcting Codes (EAQECC). Traditionally, lifting factorizations relies on the generic Hensel's Lemma, masking the underlying algebraic structure. In this paper, we establish a structural isomorphism between the lifting process and the roots of a special auxiliary polynomial $V(x)$, unveiling a deterministic link to Dickson polynomials. Based on this theory, we develop \texttt{Dickson-Engine}, a linear-time algorithm ($O(ep)$) that outperforms standard libraries by orders of magnitude. Applying this engine to $\mathbb{Z}_{169}$, we explicitly construct a family of classical LCD codes of length $n=182$ via the isometric Gray map. Our search reveals codes with parameters (e.g., $[182, 1, 168]_{13}$ and $[182, 2, 144]_{13}$) that are \textbf{near-optimal} with respect to the theoretical Griesmer Bound. Notably, we discover a ``robustness plateau'' starting from non-trivial dimensions ($k=4$), where the minimum distance remains stable ($d=120$) even as the dimension triples ($k=4 \rightarrow 12$). These codes provide exceptional resources for post-quantum cryptography and quantum error correction without entanglement consumption ($c=0$).
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper claims to factorize the polynomial x^{p+1}-1 over Z_{p^e} (p odd prime) by establishing a structural isomorphism between the factorization lifting process and the roots of an auxiliary polynomial V(x) that is deterministically linked to Dickson polynomials. This yields the Dickson-Engine algorithm with claimed O(ep) runtime that bypasses generic Hensel lifting, which is then applied to Z_{169} to explicitly construct a family of classical LCD codes of length n=182 via the isometric Gray map. The resulting codes include parameters such as [182,1,168]_{13} and [182,2,144]_{13} that are asserted to be near-optimal relative to the Griesmer bound, along with the discovery of a robustness plateau where minimum distance remains stable at d=120 for dimensions k from 4 to 12.
Significance. If the claimed isomorphism is rigorously established and the algorithm truly achieves linear time without hidden dependencies on standard lifting techniques, the work would supply a new algebraic framework for explicit factorization over p-adic rings with direct utility in constructing Hermitian-symmetric cyclic codes for LCD and entanglement-assisted quantum codes. The concrete code parameters and the reported robustness plateau would constitute falsifiable, reproducible resources for post-quantum cryptography and quantum error correction.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract and theory section introducing V(x)] The central claim that the roots of V(x) furnish a complete, deterministic isomorphism for lifting factorizations from Z_p to Z_{p^e} without implicit reliance on Hensel's lemma (e.g., derivative non-vanishing or p-adic valuation conditions) is load-bearing for both the novelty and the O(ep) runtime assertion, yet the manuscript supplies neither an explicit closed-form expression for V(x) nor a self-contained proof that the root conditions avoid encoding the same existence/uniqueness criteria as generic Hensel lifting. This gap directly affects the independence of the Dickson-Engine construction.
- [Algorithm description and experimental results on Z_{169}] The performance claim that Dickson-Engine runs in O(ep) time and outperforms standard libraries by orders of magnitude rests on the correctness of the V(x)-based factorization; without an independent verification (e.g., explicit factorization tables for small p,e or comparison against a reference implementation of Hensel lifting on the same instances), the reported runtime and the 'near-optimal' code parameters cannot be assessed as improvements over existing methods.
minor comments (2)
- [Code construction and parameter table] The abstract asserts a 'robustness plateau' starting at k=4 with stable d=120, but does not specify the precise range of k or the underlying weight distribution that produces this stability; a short table or plot would clarify the claim.
- [Theory development] Notation for the auxiliary polynomial V(x) and its connection to Dickson polynomials should be introduced with a self-contained definition before the isomorphism statement, rather than assuming familiarity with the Dickson polynomial family.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The comments identify areas where additional explicitness and verification data will strengthen the presentation. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications and data in the revised manuscript.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract and theory section introducing V(x)] The central claim that the roots of V(x) furnish a complete, deterministic isomorphism for lifting factorizations from Z_p to Z_{p^e} without implicit reliance on Hensel's lemma (e.g., derivative non-vanishing or p-adic valuation conditions) is load-bearing for both the novelty and the O(ep) runtime assertion, yet the manuscript supplies neither an explicit closed-form expression for V(x) nor a self-contained proof that the root conditions avoid encoding the same existence/uniqueness criteria as generic Hensel lifting. This gap directly affects the independence of the Dickson-Engine construction.
Authors: We acknowledge that the current exposition would benefit from greater explicitness. The auxiliary polynomial V(x) is defined in the manuscript via its relation to the Dickson polynomial of the second kind (specifically, V(x) arises as the image of x^{p+1}-1 under the structural map induced by the Dickson isomorphism), and the lifting correspondence is proven by showing that each root of V(x) modulo p determines a unique monic factor lift whose coefficients satisfy a linear recurrence derived from the Dickson addition formula. This construction encodes the lifting directly in the polynomial equation rather than invoking derivative non-vanishing as a separate hypothesis. Nevertheless, to make the independence fully self-contained, we will add an explicit closed-form expression for V(x) (obtained by substituting the Dickson polynomial recurrence into the factorization map) together with a dedicated lemma that isolates the root conditions from the classical Hensel criteria and demonstrates they are strictly weaker. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Algorithm description and experimental results on Z_{169}] The performance claim that Dickson-Engine runs in O(ep) time and outperforms standard libraries by orders of magnitude rests on the correctness of the V(x)-based factorization; without an independent verification (e.g., explicit factorization tables for small p,e or comparison against a reference implementation of Hensel lifting on the same instances), the reported runtime and the 'near-optimal' code parameters cannot be assessed as improvements over existing methods.
Authors: We agree that concrete verification data are necessary for independent assessment. In the revised version we will insert a new subsection containing: (i) explicit factorization tables for x^{p+1}-1 over Z_{p^e} for small odd primes p=3,5 and exponents e=1,2,3, listing the complete set of irreducible factors produced by Dickson-Engine; (ii) direct runtime measurements on the same instances against a reference Hensel-lifting implementation (e.g., the built-in lifting routine in SageMath), confirming the observed O(ep) scaling and the reported speed-up factors; and (iii) the resulting LCD-code parameters over Z_169 together with the Griesmer-bound comparison. These additions will allow readers to reproduce both the factorization steps and the claimed complexity. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: new auxiliary polynomial and Dickson link presented as independent structural theory
full rationale
The paper introduces an auxiliary polynomial V(x) whose roots are claimed to govern the lifting isomorphism, with an explicit link to Dickson polynomials enabling the O(ep) Dickson-Engine algorithm. No equations or definitions in the abstract or claims show V(x) or the isomorphism being constructed from the target factorization or from Hensel conditions; the approach is positioned as bypassing generic lifting via this new structure. No self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatz smuggling appear in the provided text. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained as a novel algebraic construction rather than a rephrasing of inputs.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Dickson polynomials satisfy the required root-lifting relations over Z_{p^e} for odd primes p.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
S. E. Anderson, E. Camps-Moreno, H. H. L´ opez, G. L. Matthews, D. Ruano, and I. Soprunov. Relative hulls and quantum codes.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 70(5):3190–3201, 2024
2024
-
[2]
Berlekamp.Algebraic Coding Theory
Elwyn R. Berlekamp.Algebraic Coding Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968. 17
1968
-
[3]
D. G. Cantor and H. Zassenhaus. A new algorithm for factoring polynomials over finite fields.Mathematics of Computation, 36(154):587–592, 1981
1981
-
[4]
Linear codes overF q are equivalent to LCD codes forq >3.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 64(4):3010–3017, 2018
Claude Carlet, Sihem Mesnager, Chunming Tang, Yanfeng Qi, and Ruud Pellikaan. Linear codes overF q are equivalent to LCD codes forq >3.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 64(4):3010–3017, 2018
2018
-
[5]
W. S. Chou. The factorization of Dickson polynomials over finite fields.Finite Fields and Their Applications, 3(1):84–96, 1997
1997
-
[6]
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993
Henri Cohen.A Course in Computational Algebraic Number Theory, volume 138 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993
1993
-
[7]
A metric for codes over residue class rings
Ioan Constantinescu and Werner Heise. A metric for codes over residue class rings. Problems of Information Transmission, 33(3):208–213, 1997
1997
-
[8]
Dinh, Bac Trong Nguyen, Abhay Kumar Singh, and Songsak Sriboonchitta
Hai Q. Dinh, Bac Trong Nguyen, Abhay Kumar Singh, and Songsak Sriboonchitta. On the symbol-pair distance of repeated-root constacyclic codes of prime power lengths. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 64(4):2417–2430, 2018
2018
-
[9]
R. W. Fitzgerald and J. L. Yucas. Factors of Dickson polynomials over finite fields. Finite Fields and Their Applications, 11(4):724–737, 2005
2005
-
[10]
Gemini (version 3.0 pro)[large language model].https://gemini
Google DeepMind. Gemini (version 3.0 pro)[large language model].https://gemini. google.com,https://aistudio.google.com, 2026. Used for manuscript refinement and code optimization assistance
2026
-
[11]
Gray isometries for finite chain rings and a non- linear ternary (36,3 12,15) code.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 45(7):2522– 2524, 1999
Marcus Greferath and Stefan E Schmidt. Gray isometries for finite chain rings and a non- linear ternary (36,3 12,15) code.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 45(7):2522– 2524, 1999
1999
-
[12]
W. C. Huffman and V. Pless.Fundamentals of Error-Correcting Codes. Cambridge University Press, 2003
2003
-
[13]
Lang.Algebraic Number Theory
S. Lang.Algebraic Number Theory. Springer, 2nd edition, 1994
1994
-
[14]
Lidl and H
R. Lidl and H. Niederreiter.Finite Fields. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 1997
1997
-
[15]
LCD codes over finite chain rings.Finite Fields Their Appl., 34:1–19, 2015
Xiusheng Liu and Hualu Liu. LCD codes over finite chain rings.Finite Fields Their Appl., 34:1–19, 2015
2015
-
[16]
G. McGuire. An approach to Hensel’s lemma.Irish Mathematical Society Bulletin, 47:15–21, 2001
2001
-
[17]
Yusaku Nishimura, Katsuyuki Takashima, and Tsuyoshi Miezaki. On lattice isomor- phism problems for lattices from lcd codes over finite rings.IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, E109.A(3):167– 175, 2026. 18
2026
-
[18]
J. H. Shi.Identities of Binomial Coefficients. Press of University of Science and Tech- nology of China, 2009
2009
-
[19]
NTL: A library for doing number theory.https://libntl.org, 2025
Victor Shoup. NTL: A library for doing number theory.https://libntl.org, 2025. v11.4.3
2025
-
[20]
Entanglement-assisted quantum error-correcting codes over local frobenius rings
Tania Sidana and Navin Kashyap. Entanglement-assisted quantum error-correcting codes over local frobenius rings. InIEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, ISIT 2022, Espoo, Finland, June 26 - July 1, 2022, pages 1064–1069. IEEE, 2022
2022
-
[21]
van Hoeij
M. van Hoeij. Factoring polynomials and the Knapsack problem.Journal of Number Theory, 95(2):167–189, 2002. A Mathematical Proof of the Structural Isomorphism In this appendix, we provide the rigorous proof for Theorem 3.2. The core logic relies on establishing that the polynomialV(x), defined via specific binomial coefficients, implicitly satisfies the r...
2002
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.