arxiv: 2604.19445 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

LoViF 2026 Challenge on Real-World All-in-One Image Restoration: Methods and Results

Xiang Chen , Hao Li , Jiangxin Dong , Jinshan Pan , Xin Li , Xin He , Naiwei Chen , Shengyuan Li

show 49 more authors

Fengning Liu Haoyi Lv Haowei Peng Yilian Zhong Yuxiang Chen Shibo Yin Yushun Fang Xilei Zhu Yahui Wang Chen Lu Kaibin Chen Xu Zhang Xuhui Cao Jiaqi Ma Ziqi Wang Shengkai Hu Yuning Cui Huan Zhang Shi Chen Bin Ren Lefei Zhang Guanglu Dong Qiyao Zhao Tianheng Zheng Chunlei Li Lichao Mou Chao Ren Wangzhi Xing Xin Lu Enxuan Gu Jingxi Zhang Diqi Chen Qiaosi Yi Bingcai Wei Mingyu Liu Pengyu Wang Ce Liu Miaoxin Guan Boyu Chen Hongyu Li Jian Zhu Xinrui Luo Ziyang He Jiayu Wang Yichen Xiang Huayi Qi Haoyu Bian Yiran Li Sunlichen Zhou

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords image restorationall-in-one restorationreal-world degradationsbenchmarkchallengecomputer visionlow-level visionunified model

0 comments

The pith

The LoViF 2026 Challenge provides a unified benchmark for real-world all-in-one image restoration across multiple degradations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reviews the LoViF Challenge, which tested image restoration models on real-world photos affected by several degradation types at once. The organizers created one evaluation framework to measure how models perform on blur, low-light conditions, haze, rain, and snow without being told which problem is present. The event drew 124 registered participants and produced nine complete final submissions with fact sheets. Analysis of those entries identifies practical techniques and creates a shared standard for comparing future work in low-level vision. A single benchmark matters because everyday images rarely suffer from only one issue, so separate specialized tools are inefficient.

Core claim

The LoViF Challenge establishes a unified benchmark for real-world all-in-one image restoration under diverse degradation conditions including blur, low-light, haze, rain, and snow. It received nine valid submissions from 124 registered participants, and the detailed analysis of these methods highlights effective approaches while setting a reference point for future research in unified real-world image restoration.

What carries the argument

The unified benchmark that evaluates restoration models for robustness and generalization across multiple degradation categories in a common framework.

If this is right

Models can be compared directly on their ability to handle several real-world degradations simultaneously without knowing the type in advance.
Effective techniques identified in the submissions become reference points for building more general restoration systems.
The benchmark allows consistent tracking of progress in low-level vision tasks that were previously evaluated separately.
Future methods can be tested against the same standard to demonstrate improvement over current submissions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

All-in-one models could replace multiple specialized tools in applications such as mobile photography or surveillance video.
If the benchmark images capture typical real-world mixtures, research effort may shift away from single-degradation solutions.
Extending the challenge to video sequences or additional degradation types would test whether the same unified approach scales.

Load-bearing premise

The nine submitted methods and the chosen test images fairly represent the state of the art and the full variety of real-world degradations without selection bias or undisclosed tuning.

What would settle it

A new all-in-one restoration method that substantially outperforms every submitted entry on the exact same test images, or new evidence that the test set misses common real-world degradation combinations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19445 by Bingcai Wei, Bin Ren, Boyu Chen, Ce Liu, Chao Ren, Chen Lu, Chunlei Li, Diqi Chen, Enxuan Gu, Fengning Liu, Guanglu Dong, Hao Li, Haowei Peng, Haoyi Lv, Haoyu Bian, Hongyu Li, Huan Zhang, Huayi Qi, Jiangxin Dong, Jian Zhu, Jiaqi Ma, Jiayu Wang, Jingxi Zhang, Jinshan Pan, Kaibin Chen, Lefei Zhang, Lichao Mou, Miaoxin Guan, Mingyu Liu, Naiwei Chen, Pengyu Wang, Qiaosi Yi, Qiyao Zhao, Shengkai Hu, Shengyuan Li, Shibo Yin, Shi Chen, Sunlichen Zhou, Tianheng Zheng, Wangzhi Xing, Xiang Chen, Xilei Zhu, Xin He, Xin Li, Xin Lu, Xinrui Luo, Xuhui Cao, Xu Zhang, Yahui Wang, Yichen Xiang, Yilian Zhong, Yiran Li, Yuning Cui, Yushun Fang, Yuxiang Chen, Ziqi Wang, Ziyang He.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The overall framework of Team %sIR. LPIPS loss. This stage is trained for 80,000 iterations to learn general restoration priors. In the second stage, they fine-tune the model on the competition training dataset to reduce the domain gap. The VAE is still frozen while the DiT backbone is fully optimized. The batch size is 8, the loss function is MSE loss, and the training runs for 110,000 iterations. In the … view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The overall framework of Team DGL-team. the BioModule design. Specifically, they fuse two complementary streams of visual information: large-field contextual signals from the peripheral pathway and fine-grained spatial details from the foveal pathway. These two representations are aggregated and recalibrated through an elementwise multiplication mechanism, allowing the network to effectively harmonize… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The overall framework of Team GU-day Mate. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The overall framework of Team AIOVision. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

This paper presents a review for the LoViF Challenge on Real-World All-in-One Image Restoration. The challenge aimed to advance research on real-world all-in-one image restoration under diverse real-world degradation conditions, including blur, low-light, haze, rain, and snow. It provided a unified benchmark to evaluate the robustness and generalization ability of restoration models across multiple degradation categories within a common framework. The competition attracted 124 registered participants and received 9 valid final submissions with corresponding fact sheets, significantly contributing to the progress of real-world all-in-one image restoration. This report provides a detailed analysis of the submitted methods and corresponding results, emphasizing recent progress in unified real-world image restoration. The analysis highlights effective approaches and establishes a benchmark for future research in real-world low-level vision.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a standard challenge report that records participation and summarizes submitted methods for an all-in-one real-world restoration benchmark, without new algorithms or findings.

read the letter

This paper is a competition report on the LoViF 2026 challenge for real-world all-in-one image restoration. It mainly documents that 124 teams registered and 9 made valid final submissions with fact sheets, then reviews the approaches they used on a test set covering blur, low-light, haze, rain, and snow together. That is the core content. No new method, derivation, or standalone empirical result appears beyond the organization of the event itself. The value sits in creating one unified benchmark instead of separate ones for each degradation type, which could reduce the usual apples-to-oranges comparisons in the field. The report also flags some effective patterns from the submissions, such as how certain teams handled multiple degradations in a single model. That part is straightforward and potentially helpful for anyone scanning recent entries in this area. The main limitation is that the paper does not supply enough detail on test-set construction, selection criteria for the images, or controls against post-hoc tuning to judge how representative or fair the rankings are. Challenge reports often face this issue, and here it means readers cannot easily tell whether the top entries would hold up on fresh real-world data or just on this particular collection. There are no equations, proofs, or parameter counts to inspect, and the citation pattern is mostly internal to the challenge. The work is aimed at researchers already active in low-level vision who want a current snapshot of what teams tried under a common protocol. If you are outside that niche or looking for a technical advance to build on, it will not move the needle. I would still send it to peer review so the benchmark details and participation numbers become citable and the community can comment on the evaluation setup before it gets used more widely.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports on the LoViF 2026 Challenge for real-world all-in-one image restoration. It describes the challenge goal of evaluating unified models across multiple real-world degradations (blur, low-light, haze, rain, snow), states that 124 participants registered and 9 valid final submissions with fact sheets were received, analyzes the submitted methods, and concludes that the event and its benchmark contribute to progress in the field.

Significance. Competition reports of this type can usefully document participation levels and catalog current approaches in a rapidly evolving area. The reported numbers establish interest in unified restoration frameworks, and the provision of fact sheets plus method analysis offers a snapshot that future work can reference. No machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations are present, but the factual recording of submissions and the emphasis on a common benchmark are the primary strengths if the underlying evaluation is reproducible.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the challenge 'significantly contributing to the progress'; this phrasing is common but would be stronger if tied to concrete observations from the method analysis (e.g., which architectural choices appeared most effective across degradations).
The manuscript would benefit from a brief explicit statement of the test-set construction criteria and the precise metrics used for ranking, so readers can independently judge whether the 9 submissions fairly sample the space of real-world degradations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive review and the recommendation to accept the manuscript. The report accurately captures the challenge's goals, participation statistics, and the value of the provided benchmark and method analysis for the field of real-world all-in-one image restoration.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; factual competition summary

full rationale

The document is a competition report summarizing participation (124 registrations, 9 submissions), method descriptions, and benchmark results for real-world all-in-one restoration. No equations, derivations, predictions, fitted parameters, or technical claims exist that could reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs, or self-citation chains. Central statements are organizational facts about the event and submitted approaches, with no load-bearing premises requiring external verification beyond the reported outcomes. This is self-contained factual reporting with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities as this is an empirical challenge report without theoretical modeling.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5645 in / 1030 out tokens · 81531 ms · 2026-05-10T02:47:29.284755+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

[1]

Unirestore: Unified perceptual and task-oriented image restoration model using diffusion prior

I Chen, Wei-Ting Chen, Yu-Wei Liu, Yuan-Chun Chiang, Sy-Yen Kuo, Ming-Hsuan Yang, et al. Unirestore: Unified perceptual and task-oriented image restoration model using diffusion prior. InCVPR, 2025. 7

2025
[2]

Simple baselines for image restoration

Liangyu Chen, Xiaojie Chu, Xiangyu Zhang, and Jian Sun. Simple baselines for image restoration. InECCV. Springer,
[3]

Learn- ing a sparse transformer network for effective image derain- ing

Xiang Chen, Hao Li, Mingqiang Li, and Jinshan Pan. Learn- ing a sparse transformer network for effective image derain- ing. InCVPR, 2023. 2

2023
[4]

Foundir-v2: Optimizing pre-training data mix- tures for image restoration foundation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.09282, 2025

Xiang Chen, Jinshan Pan, Jiangxin Dong, Jian Yang, and Jinhui Tang. Foundir-v2: Optimizing pre-training data mix- tures for image restoration foundation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.09282, 2025. 1

work page arXiv 2025
[5]

Bio-inspired im- age restoration

Yuning Cui, Wenqi Ren, and Alois Knoll. Bio-inspired im- age restoration. InNeurIPS, 2025. 5

2025
[6]

Visual- in-visual: A unified and efficient baseline for image restora- tion.IEEE TPAMI, 2026

Yuning Cui, Wenqi Ren, Boxin Shi, and Alois Knoll. Visual- in-visual: A unified and efficient baseline for image restora- tion.IEEE TPAMI, 2026. 7

2026
[7]

Learning domain- aware task prompt representations for multi-domain all-in- one image restoration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01725,

Guanglu Dong, Chunlei Li, Chao Ren, Jingliang Hu, Yilei Shi, Xiao Xiang Zhu, and Lichao Mou. Learning domain- aware task prompt representations for multi-domain all-in- one image restoration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01725,

work page arXiv
[8]

Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis

Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas M ¨uller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Dominik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, et al. Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. InICML, 2024. 3

2024
[9]

Weatherbench: A real-world bench- mark dataset for all-in-one adverse weather image restora- tion

Qiyuan Guan, Qianfeng Yang, Xiang Chen, Tianyu Song, Guiyue Jin, and Jiyu Jin. Weatherbench: A real-world bench- mark dataset for all-in-one adverse weather image restora- tion. InACM MM, 2025. 2

2025
[10]

A survey on all-in-one image restoration: Tax- onomy, evaluation and future trends.IEEE TPAMI, 2025

Junjun Jiang, Zengyuan Zuo, Gang Wu, Kui Jiang, and Xi- anming Liu. A survey on all-in-one image restoration: Tax- onomy, evaluation and future trends.IEEE TPAMI, 2025. 1

2025
[11]

Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution

Justin Johnson, Alexandre Alahi, and Li Fei-Fei. Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. In ECCV. Springer, 2016. 6

2016
[12]

Efficient frequency domain-based trans- formers for high-quality image deblurring

Lingshun Kong, Jiangxin Dong, Jianjun Ge, Mingqiang Li, and Jinshan Pan. Efficient frequency domain-based trans- formers for high-quality image deblurring. InCVPR, 2023. 2

2023
[13]

All-in-one image restoration for unknown cor- ruption

Boyun Li, Xiao Liu, Peng Hu, Zhongqin Wu, Jiancheng Lv, and Xi Peng. All-in-one image restoration for unknown cor- ruption. InCVPR, 2022. 1

2022
[14]

Foundir: Unleashing million-scale training data to advance foundation models for image restoration

Hao Li, Xiang Chen, Jiangxin Dong, Jinhui Tang, and Jin- shan Pan. Foundir: Unleashing million-scale training data to advance foundation models for image restoration. InICCV,
[15]

Ntire 2025 challenge on day and night raindrop removal for dual-focused images: Methods and results

Xin Li, Yeying Jin, Xin Jin, Zongwei Wu, Bingchen Li, Yufei Wang, Wenhan Yang, Yu Li, Zhibo Chen, Bihan Wen, et al. Ntire 2025 challenge on day and night raindrop removal for dual-focused images: Methods and results. InCVPR Work- shop, 2025. 2, 5

2025
[16]

LoViF 2026 the first challenge on human- oriented semantic image quality assessment: Methods and results

Xin Li, Daoli Xu, Wei Luo, Guoqiang Xiang, Haoran Li, Chengyu Zhuang, Zhibo Chen, Jian Guan, and Weipin- gand others Li. LoViF 2026 the first challenge on human- oriented semantic image quality assessment: Methods and results. InCVPR Workshop, 2026. 2

2026
[17]

Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution

Bee Lim, Sanghyun Son, Heewon Kim, Seungjun Nah, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. InCVPRW, pages 136–144, 2017. 6

2017
[18]

LoViF 2026 the first challenge on holistic quality assessment for 4d world model (physcore)

Wei Luo, Yiting Lu, Xin Li, Haoran Li, Fengbin Guan, Chen Gao, Xin Jin, Yong Li, Zhibo Chen, et al. LoViF 2026 the first challenge on holistic quality assessment for 4d world model (physcore). InCVPR Workshop, 2026. 2

2026
[19]

Promptir: Prompting for all-in- one image restoration.NeurIPS, 2024

Vaishnav Potlapalli, Syed Waqas Zamir, Salman H Khan, and Fahad Shahbaz Khan. Promptir: Prompting for all-in- one image restoration.NeurIPS, 2024. 1

2024
[20]

LoViF 2026 the first challenge on weather removal in videos

Chenghao Qian, Xin Li, Yeying Jin, Shangquan Sun, et al. LoViF 2026 the first challenge on weather removal in videos. InCVPR Workshop, 2026. 2

2026
[21]

Strrnet: Semantics-guided two-stage rain- drop removal network

Qiyu Rong, Hongyuan Jing, Mengmeng Zhang, Jinlong Li, and Mengfei Han. Strrnet: Semantics-guided two-stage rain- drop removal network. InCVPR, 2025. 5

2025
[22]

Com- plexity experts are task-discriminative learners for any image restoration

Eduard Zamfir, Zongwei Wu, Nancy Mehta, Yuedong Tan, Danda Pani Paudel, Yulun Zhang, and Radu Timofte. Com- plexity experts are task-discriminative learners for any image restoration. InCVPR, 2025. 4

2025
[23]

The 1st LoViF challenge on efficient vlm for multimodal cre- ative quality scoring: Methods and results

Jusheng Zhang, Qinhan Lyu, Sizhuo Ma, Sheng Cao, Jian Wang, Xin Li, Keze Wang, Yongsen Zheng, Jing Yang, et al. The 1st LoViF challenge on efficient vlm for multimodal cre- ative quality scoring: Methods and results. InCVPR Work- shop, 2026. 2

2026
[24]

Selective hourglass mapping for universal image restoration based on diffusion model

Dian Zheng, Xiao-Ming Wu, Shuzhou Yang, Jian Zhang, Jian-Fang Hu, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Selective hourglass mapping for universal image restoration based on diffusion model. InCVPR, 2024. 1

2024
[25]

Wave-mamba: Wavelet state space model for ultra-high- definition low-light image enhancement

Wenbin Zou, Hongxia Gao, Weipeng Yang, and Tongtong Liu. Wave-mamba: Wavelet state space model for ultra-high- definition low-light image enhancement. InACM MM, 2024. 2

2024