pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20437 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Programming strain-stiffening in soft composites via structural memory near jamming

Yiqiu Zhao , Deng Pan , Yiming Pang , Jonathan Bar\'es , Chang Xu , Che Liu , Haitao Hu , Yuliang Jin
show 1 more author
Qin Xu
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords strain-stiffeningsoft compositesstructural memoryjammingcontact networksnon-affine deformationmechanical traininggranular materials
0
0 comments X

The pith

Contact network memory near jamming produces biopolymer-like strain stiffening in soft composites

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that soft composites of particles in a compliant matrix can be mechanically trained near the shear-jamming boundary so that their particle contact networks store structural memory. That memory then produces a crossover to biopolymer-like strain stiffening under later deformation, even when the matrix itself remains linearly elastic. Simulations of a coarse-grained model show the stiffening arises because the trained, nearly jammed networks undergo larger non-affine particle rearrangements. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach supplies a route to programmable nonlinear mechanics that depends only on the history of the granular contacts rather than on special chemistry in the surrounding matrix.

Core claim

By applying a mechanical training protocol near a shear-jamming phase boundary, the structural memory encoded in contact networks drives a crossover from granular-like to biopolymer-like strain stiffening. Coarse-grained simulations reveal that this response emerges from enhanced non-affine reconfigurations of the nearly-jammed contact networks. Without relying on matrix nonlinearity, the work establishes a design strategy that leverages non-equilibrium memory effects intrinsic to granular systems to achieve highly programmable strain-stiffening in soft composites.

What carries the argument

structural memory encoded in disordered contact networks, which drives non-affine reconfigurations near the jamming boundary to produce strain stiffening

If this is right

  • Programmable strain-stiffening can be achieved in soft composites solely by choosing appropriate training protocols near the jamming boundary.
  • The stiffening response no longer requires nonlinear elasticity in the embedding matrix.
  • Non-equilibrium, history-dependent effects intrinsic to granular contact networks become a controllable design variable for composite mechanics.
  • The strategy supplies a matrix-independent route to tunable mechanical responses for synthetic tissues and soft robotic materials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same training principle could be used to control other nonlinear properties such as damping or failure thresholds in disordered composites.
  • The approach suggests that certain biopolymer-like mechanics observed in natural materials might originate from analogous contact-memory effects rather than from polymer nonlinearity alone.
  • Systematic variation of training amplitude and duration in both experiment and simulation could map the range of achievable stiffening curves.
  • Extension to three-dimensional or polydisperse systems would test how robust the memory-based programming remains outside the current model.

Load-bearing premise

The observed crossover to biopolymer-like stiffening is produced by persistent changes in the particle contact network rather than by unintended changes to the matrix, particle-matrix adhesion, or other experimental variables during training.

What would settle it

If the same stiffening crossover appears after training even when inter-particle contacts are suppressed or when contact networks are reset between cycles, or if simulations without contacts reproduce the identical response.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20437 by Chang Xu, Che Liu, Deng Pan, Haitao Hu, Jonathan Bar\'es, Qin Xu, Yiming Pang, Yiqiu Zhao, Yuliang Jin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (d) presents ΓSJ as a function of ϕ and δγosc. For each ϕ between 0.60 and 0.66, starting from the phase boundary δγosc ≈ δγc(ϕ), ΓSJ increases monotonically from zero with δγosc. The contour plot ΓSJ(ϕ, δγosc) reveals a history-dependent, non-equilibrium jamming plane for the PS-PDMS suspensions, a feature previ￾ously explored only in simulations [26–28]. In a verti￾cal plane at a fixed volume fraction (ϕ… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (c) shows G(τ0) for soft composites prepared with constant material parameters (ϕ = 0.64 and Gm = 1.23 kPa) but subjected to varying training amplitudes δγosc. As δγosc increases from 0.005 to 0.20, the strain￾stiffening regimes, characterized by a power-law scaling G ∼ τ α 0 , becomes more pronounced, with the stiffen￾ing exponent α transitioning from 2/3 to 3/2 (top panel, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: ). In those systems, such scaling is conventionally attributed to the entropic stiffening of semi-flexible poly￾mers. However, nonlinear elasticity of the matrix cannot account for the mechanical responses observed in our PS￾PDMS composites, as silicone gels exhibit a broad linear regime and only a weak stiffening (α < 1) at large strains (Extended Data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Soft composite solids, comprising discrete inclusions embedded within a compliant matrix, are emerging candidates for engineering synthetic tissues and soft robotic materials. Current strategies for controlling their nonlinear mechanics, such as strain-stiffening, have primarily relied on the nonlinear elasticity of polymer matrices. Although direct contacts between inclusions may enhance stiffening responses at high densities, the role of the non-equilibrium and history-dependent nature of disordered contact networks in composite mechanics remains unexplored. In this work, by applying a mechanical training protocol near a shear-jamming phase boundary, we demonstrate that the structural memory encoded in contact networks drives a crossover from granular-like to biopolymer-like strain stiffening. Simulations of a coarse-grained composite model reveal that this biopolymer-like mechanical response emerges from enhanced non-affine reconfigurations of nearly-jammed contact networks. Without relying on matrix nonlinearity, we establish a design strategy that leverages non-equilibrium memory effects intrinsic to granular systems to achieve highly programmable strain-stiffening in soft composites.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that mechanical training near the shear-jamming phase boundary encodes structural memory in the contact networks of inclusions within soft composites. This memory drives a crossover from granular-like to biopolymer-like strain-stiffening behavior. The effect is demonstrated experimentally via a training protocol and supported by coarse-grained simulations attributing the response to enhanced non-affine reconfigurations of nearly-jammed networks, without requiring nonlinear matrix elasticity.

Significance. If the central attribution holds, the work establishes a new design strategy for highly programmable strain-stiffening in soft composites by exploiting intrinsic non-equilibrium memory effects in disordered granular systems. This is valuable for applications in synthetic tissues and soft robotics, as it decouples the nonlinear mechanics from matrix nonlinearity. The combination of an independent experimental protocol with simulation comparisons that isolate contact-network effects strengthens the potential impact.

major comments (1)
  1. [Simulations section (coarse-grained model description)] The central claim requires that biopolymer-like stiffening emerges purely from structural memory and non-affine reconfigurations without matrix nonlinearity. The abstract states this is shown in simulations of a coarse-grained composite model, but provides no explicit confirmation that the matrix is modeled with strictly linear elasticity (no strain-dependent terms, nonlinear particle-matrix couplings, or training-induced changes to effective matrix properties). If any such terms are present, the attribution to contact-network memory alone is compromised. Please provide the constitutive equations for the matrix and any linearity controls in the simulation methods.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from quantitative details on the observed crossover (e.g., specific strain ranges, stiffening indices, or comparison metrics between granular-like and biopolymer-like regimes) to make the transition more precise.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the positive assessment of its potential significance. We address the single major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim requires that biopolymer-like stiffening emerges purely from structural memory and non-affine reconfigurations without matrix nonlinearity. The abstract states this is shown in simulations of a coarse-grained composite model, but provides no explicit confirmation that the matrix is modeled with strictly linear elasticity (no strain-dependent terms, nonlinear particle-matrix couplings, or training-induced changes to effective matrix properties). If any such terms are present, the attribution to contact-network memory alone is compromised. Please provide the constitutive equations for the matrix and any linearity controls in the simulation methods.

    Authors: We agree that the simulation methods section should explicitly document the matrix constitutive model to support the attribution to contact-network effects. In our coarse-grained model the matrix is treated as a strictly linear isotropic elastic continuum. Its elastic energy is given by the standard quadratic form E = (1/2) ∫ [λ (tr ε)^2 + 2μ ε : ε] dV, where λ and μ are constant Lamé coefficients independent of strain, and ε is the infinitesimal strain tensor. Particle-matrix interactions are implemented via linear springs or equivalent boundary conditions that transmit forces proportional to relative displacement; no nonlinear or strain-dependent couplings are present. The training protocol modifies only the contact network between inclusions and leaves the matrix parameters unchanged. As a linearity control we have simulated the pure matrix (no inclusions) under the same strain protocols and confirmed that the stress-strain relation remains linear with constant modulus up to the maximum strains used in the composite runs. We will add the constitutive equation, the description of the interaction scheme, and the control-simulation results to the revised simulation methods section. These additions do not alter any of our conclusions but make the absence of matrix nonlinearity fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claim rests on independent experimental protocol and simulation comparison

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain consists of an experimental mechanical training protocol applied near the shear-jamming boundary, followed by direct observation of strain-stiffening crossover and supporting coarse-grained simulations that attribute the response to non-affine reconfigurations in contact networks. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are invoked that reduce the claimed structural-memory effect to a definitional identity or post-hoc fit by construction. The model assumptions (including matrix linearity) are stated separately from the target result, and the attribution is tested via comparison of trained versus untrained configurations, rendering the logic self-contained against external benchmarks rather than circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that disordered contact networks near jamming retain structural memory that can be programmed by shear training and that this memory directly controls non-affine particle rearrangements under subsequent strain.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Disordered contact networks near the shear-jamming transition exhibit programmable structural memory under mechanical training.
    Invoked to explain the crossover from granular-like to biopolymer-like strain-stiffening independent of matrix nonlinearity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5485 in / 1271 out tokens · 32144 ms · 2026-05-09T23:23:28.609581+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. J. Licup, S. M¨ unster, A. Sharma, M. Sheinman, L. M. Jawerth, B. Fabry, D. A. Weitz, and F. C. MacKintosh, Stress controls the mechanics of collagen networks, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 9573 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Sharma, A

    A. Sharma, A. J. Licup, K. A. Jansen, R. Rens, M. Shein- man, G. H. Koenderink, and F. C. MacKintosh,Strain- controlled criticality governs the nonlinear mechanics of fibre networks, Nature Physics12, 584 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Burla, J

    F. Burla, J. Tauber, S. Dussi, J. van der Gucht, and G. H. Koenderink,Stress management in composite biopolymer networks, Nature Physics15, 549 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Huang, J

    J. Huang, J. O. Cochran, S. M. Fielding, M. C. Marchetti, and D. Bi,Shear-driven solidification and nonlinear elasticity in epithelial tissues, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 178001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Y. Fang, E. Han, X.-X. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Y. Lin, J. Shi, J. Wu, L. Meng, X. Gao, P. J. Griffin, X. Xiao, H.-M. Tsai, H. Zhou, X. Zuo, Q. Zhang, M. Chu, Q. Zhang, Y. Gao, L. K. Roth, R. Bleher, Z. Ma, Z. Jiang, J. Yue, C.-M. Kao, C.-T. Chen, A. Tokmakoff, J. Wang, H. M. Jaeger, and B. Tian,Dynamic and Pro- grammable Cellular-Scale Granules Enable Tissue-lik...

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Q. Xie, Y. Zhuang, G. Ye, T. Wang, Y. Cao, and L. Jiang,Astral hydrogels mimic tissue mechanics by aster-aster interpenetration, Nature Communications12, 4277 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Subramaniam, A

    V. Subramaniam, A. M. Shetty, S. J. Chisolm, T. R. Lansberry, A. Balachandar, C. D. Morley, and T. E. An- gelini,Biopolymer networks packed with microgels com- bine strain stiffening and shape programmability, Giant 19, 100297 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    B. Xue, X. Han, H. Zhu, Q. Li, Y. Zhang, M. Bai, Y. Li, Y. Li, M. Qin, T. Nakajima, W. Wang, J. P. Gong, and Y. Cao,Hydrogels with prestressed tensegrity structures, Nature Communications16, 3637 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    C. F. Guimar˜ aes, L. Gasperini, A. P. Marques, and R. L. Reis,The stiffness of living tissues and its implications 8 for tissue engineering, Nature Reviews Materials5, 351 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    D. Song, J. L. Shivers, F. C. MacKintosh, A. E. Patteson, and P. A. Janmey,Cell-induced confinement effects in soft tissue mechanics, Journal of Applied Physics129, 140901 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    J. Song, E. Deiss-Yehiely, S. Yesilata, and G. H. McKin- ley,Strain-stiffening universality in composite hydrogels and soft tissues, Nature Physics21, 1125 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    W. Hu, G. Z. Lum, M. Mastrangeli, and M. Sitti,Small- scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion, Na- ture554, 81 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    H. Deng, K. Sattari, Y. Xie, P. Liao, Z. Yan, and J. Lin, Laser reprogramming magnetic anisotropy in soft com- posites for reconfigurable 3d shaping, Nature Communi- cations11, 6325 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    X. Bao, F. Wang, J. Zhang, M. Li, S. Zhang, Z. Ren, J. Liao, Y. Yan, W. Kang, R. Zhang, Z. Liu, T. Wang, and M. Sitti,Real-time in situ magnetization reprogram- ming for soft robotics, Nature645, 375 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    H. C. Koydemir and A. Ozcan,Wearable and implantable sensors for biomedical applications, Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry11, 127 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Tanriverdi, G

    U. Tanriverdi, G. Senesi, T. Asfour, H. Kurt, S. L. Smith, D. Toderita, J. Shalhoub, L. Burgess, A. M. J. Bull, and F. G¨ uder,Dynamically adaptive soft metamaterial for wearable human–machine interfaces, Nature Communi- cations16, 2621 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    J. Pu, H. Li, J. Liu, K. Li, and X. Tao,Vector-stimuli- responsive magnetorheological fibrous materials, Nature 647, 375 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    A. S. G. van Oosten, X. Chen, L. Chin, K. Cruz, A. E. Patteson, K. Pogoda, V. B. Shenoy, and P. A. Janmey, Emergence of tissue-like mechanics from fibrous networks confined by close-packed cells, Nature573, 96 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    J. L. Shivers, J. Feng, A. S. G. van Oosten, H. Levine, P. A. Janmey, and F. C. MacKintosh,Compression stiff- ening of fibrous networks with stiff inclusions, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 21037 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Y. Zhao, H. Hu, Y. Huang, H. Liu, C. Yan, C. Xu, R. Zhang, Y. Wang, and Q. Xu,Elasticity-controlled jam- ming criticality in soft composite solids, Nature Commu- nications15, 1691 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    C. Xu, S. Wang, H. Wang, X. Liu, Z. Liu, Y. Zhao, W. Hu, and Q. Xu,Mechanical non-reciprocity pro- grammed by shear jamming in soft composite solids, Na- ture Materials25, 117 (2026)

    work page 2026

  22. [22]

    N. C. Keim, J. D. Paulsen, Z. Zeravcic, S. Sastry, and S. R. Nagel,Memory formation in matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Y. Zhao, Y. Zhao, D. Wang, H. Zheng, B. Chakraborty, and J. E. S. Socolar,Ultrastable shear-jammed granular material, Phys. Rev. X12, 031021 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Candela,Complex memory formation in frictional granular media, Phys

    D. Candela,Complex memory formation in frictional granular media, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 268202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    E. Y. X. Ong, A. R. Barth, N. Singh, M. Ramaswamy, A. Shetty, B. Chakraborty, J. P. Sethna, and I. Cohen, Jamming memory into acoustically trained dense suspen- sions under shear, Phys. Rev. X14, 021027 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Kumar and S

    N. Kumar and S. Luding,Memory of jamming–multiscale models for soft and granular matter, Granular Matter18, 58 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Jin and H

    Y. Jin and H. Yoshino,A jamming plane of sphere pack- ings, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Kawasaki and K

    T. Kawasaki and K. Miyazaki,Unified understanding of nonlinear rheology near the jamming transition point, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 268201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    D. Pan, F. Meng, and Y. Jin,Shear hardening in fric- tionless amorphous solids near the jamming transition, PNAS Nexus2, pgad047 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    P. Das, H. A. Vinutha, and S. Sastry,Unified phase di- agram of reversible–irreversible, jamming, and yielding transitions in cyclically sheared soft-sphere packings, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 10203 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    M. L. Gardel, J. H. Shin, F. C. MacKintosh, L. Ma- hadevan, P. A. Matsudaira, and D. A. Weitz,Scaling of f-actin network rheology to probe single filament elasticity and dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 188102 (2004)

    work page 2004

  32. [32]

    Y.-C. Lin, N. Y. Yao, C. P. Broedersz, H. Herrmann, F. C. MacKintosh, and D. A. Weitz,Origins of elasticity in intermediate filament networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 058101 (2010)

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    M. L. Gardel, J. H. Shin, F. C. MacKintosh, L. Mahade- van, P. Matsudaira, and D. A. Weitz,Elastic behavior of cross-linked and bundled actin networks, Science304, 1301 (2004)

    work page 2004

  34. [34]

    C. P. Broedersz and F. C. MacKintosh,Modeling semi- flexible polymer networks, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 995 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Meng and E

    F. Meng and E. M.Terentjev,Nonlinear elasticity of semiflexible filament networks, Soft Matter12, 6749 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Prince,Designing biomimetic strain-stiffening into synthetic hydrogels, Biomacromolecules25, 6283 (2024)

    E. Prince,Designing biomimetic strain-stiffening into synthetic hydrogels, Biomacromolecules25, 6283 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    P. H. J. Kouwer, M. Koepf, V. A. A. Le Sage, M. Jaspers, A. M. van Buul, Z. H. Eksteen-Akeroyd, T. Woltinge, E. Schwartz, H. J. Kitto, R. Hoogenboom, S. J. Picken, R. J. M. Nolte, E. Mendes, and A. E. Rowan,Responsive biomimetic networks from polyisocyanopeptide hydrogels, Nature493, 651 (2013)

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    Jaspers, M

    M. Jaspers, M. Dennison, M. F. J. Mabesoone, F. C. MacKintosh, A. E. Rowan, and P. H. J. Kouwer,Ultra- responsive soft matter from strain-stiffening hydrogels, Nature Communications5, 5808 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    W. G. Ellenbroek, E. Somfai, M. van Hecke, and W. van Saarloos,Critical scaling in linear response of frictionless granular packings near jamming, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 258001 (2006)

    work page 2006

  40. [40]

    Wyart, H

    M. Wyart, H. Liang, A. Kabla, and L. Mahadevan,Elas- ticity of floppy and stiff random networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 215501 (2008)

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    C. P. Broedersz, X. Mao, T. C. Lubensky, and F. C. MacKintosh,Criticality and isostaticity in fibre networks, Nature Physics7, 983 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    J. L. Shivers, J. Feng, and F. C. MacKintosh,Critical- ity enhances the reinforcement of disordered networks by rigid inclusions, Phys. Rev. X15, 031061 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    W. Zhao, J. Zhou, H. Hu, C. Xu, and Q. Xu,The role of crosslinking density in surface stress and surface energy of soft solids, Soft Matter18, 507 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Mullins,Softening of rubber by deformation, Rubber chemistry and technology42, 339 (1969)

    L. Mullins,Softening of rubber by deformation, Rubber chemistry and technology42, 339 (1969)

    work page 1969

  45. [45]

    R. W. Style, R. Boltyanskiy, G. K. German, C. Hyland, C. W. MacMinn, A. F. Mertz, L. A. Wilen, Y. Xu, and E. R. Dufresne,Traction force microscopy in physics and 9 biology, Soft Matter10, 4047 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    H. Hu, Y. Zhao, W. Zhao, L. Qiao, and Q. Xu,Nonmono- tonic rheology and stress heterogeneity in confined gran- ular suspensions, Journal of Rheology68, 949 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Bitzek, P

    E. Bitzek, P. Koskinen, F. G¨ ahler, M. Moseler, and P. Gumbsch,Structural relaxation made simple, Physi- cal Review Letters97, 170201 (2006)

    work page 2006

  48. [48]

    Kono,The dynamic bulk viscosity of polystyrene and polymethyl methacrylate, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan15, 718 (1960)

    R. Kono,The dynamic bulk viscosity of polystyrene and polymethyl methacrylate, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan15, 718 (1960). 10 Method Materials The PDMS-based soft composites— Our PDMS-based soft composites consist of polystyrene (PS) microspheres (XMO-50, Dongguan Xinmiao New Material Co.) with a mean diameter of 29µm randomly embedded in a cr...

    work page 1960