pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20680 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 🪐 quant-ph

Controllable non-Hermitian topology in a dynamically protected cat qubit

Tian-Le Yang , Pei-Rong Han , Zhen-Biao Yang , Shi-Biao Zheng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 00:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords cat qubitsLiouvillian exceptional pointsnon-Hermitian topologytwo-photon drivedissipative stabilizationopen quantum systemstopological invariantsquantum error correction
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

The phase of the two-photon drive controls the location and existence of higher-order Liouvillian exceptional points in a stabilized cat qubit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This work examines the non-Hermitian features that arise in a cat qubit protected by two-photon drive and two-photon loss when single-photon drive and loss are also present. In the plane of single-photon drive strength and detuning, both second-order and third-order Liouvillian exceptional points appear. The phase of the two-photon drive is shown to move these points continuously and to make the third-order point vanish completely at one specific value. A winding-number invariant is defined that assigns a unit topological charge to each third-order point. Master-equation trajectories remain inside the logical subspace with near-unit fidelity, linking dissipative stabilization to tunable non-Hermitian topology.

Core claim

In the Liouvillian spectrum of a cat qubit stabilized by two-photon drive and engineered loss, the introduction of single-photon drive and loss produces second- and third-order exceptional points. The phase θ of the two-photon drive supplies coherent control: the third-order point diverges and disappears exactly at θ = π/2 while staying tunable at other phases. A topological invariant constructed from the winding number of a resultant vector identifies every third-order point with unit charge. Full master-equation simulations confirm that the logical subspace is preserved with near-unity fidelity throughout the parameter space.

What carries the argument

Liouvillian exceptional points (LEP2 and LEP3) whose position and existence are tuned by the phase θ of the two-photon drive, together with a winding-number topological invariant that assigns unit charge to LEP3s.

If this is right

  • Setting the two-photon drive phase to π/2 eliminates the third-order exceptional point while the dissipative stabilization continues to function.
  • The winding-number invariant continues to label LEP3s correctly even when parameters are varied.
  • The system state stays inside the logical subspace with fidelity close to one near and across the exceptional points.
  • Coherent phase control therefore offers a knob for moving or removing higher-order degeneracies without destroying the cat-qubit protection.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same phase-tuning mechanism could be transplanted to other dissipatively stabilized qubits to engineer desired spectral features for readout or gate operations.
  • Because the topological charge is robust, small fabrication imperfections in the drive phase should not destroy the identification of the exceptional points.
  • Measuring the coalescence of three eigenvalues while sweeping the drive phase would provide a direct experimental test of the predicted divergence at θ = π/2.

Load-bearing premise

The two-photon drive and loss keep the system inside the cat-qubit logical subspace while the Lindblad master equation with only the added single-photon terms captures all relevant dynamics.

What would settle it

If the third-order exceptional point remains finite and does not vanish when the two-photon drive phase is set to exactly π/2, the claimed coherent control over LEP3s is false.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20680 by Pei-Rong Han, Shi-Biao Zheng, Tian-Le Yang, Zhen-Biao Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Implementation of the target dynamics via a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Liouvillian exceptional structures in the ETPL cat-qubit model. (a) Contour lines of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Phase-controlled Liouvillian exceptional structures. (a) Normalized LEP3 coordinates ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Validation of the Liouvillian dynamics. Fidelity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dissipatively stabilized cat qubits are promising for fault-tolerant quantum information processing, yet their non-Hermitian (NH) spectral topology remains largely unexplored. We uncover rich Liouvillian exceptional structures in a cat-qubit mode stabilized by two-photon drive (TPD) and engineered two-photon loss, in the presence of single-photon drive (SPD) and single-photon loss. In the parameter space spanned by SPD strength and detuning, we identify both second- and third-order Liouvillian exceptional points (LEP2s and LEP3s). Remarkably, we show that the phase $\theta$ of TPD provides coherent control over these exceptional points: the LEP3 diverges and vanishes at $\theta=\pi/2$, while remaining stable and tunable elsewhere. We introduce a topological invariant based on the winding number of a resultant vector, which robustly identifies LEP3s with unit topological charge. Full master-equation simulations confirm that the system dynamics remains confined to the logical subspace with near-unity fidelity. Our results bridge dissipative stabilization, phase-coherent control, and NH topology, demonstrating controllable higher-order LEPs in open quantum systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates non-Hermitian spectral features in a dissipatively stabilized cat qubit subject to two-photon drive (TPD) and loss, augmented by single-photon drive (SPD) and loss. In the SPD strength-detuning plane it identifies second- and third-order Liouvillian exceptional points (LEP2s, LEP3s). The phase θ of the TPD is shown to control the location of the LEP3, which diverges and vanishes at θ = π/2 while remaining tunable otherwise. A topological invariant constructed from the winding number of a resultant vector extracted from the effective Liouvillian is introduced and shown to assign unit charge to the LEP3s. Full Lindblad master-equation simulations are reported to confirm that the dynamics remains confined to the logical cat subspace with near-unity fidelity.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work establishes a concrete link between phase-coherent control of cat qubits and higher-order Liouvillian exceptional points, together with a winding-number diagnostic that is robust within the projected subspace. This combination is novel and could open routes to topologically protected operations in open quantum systems. The explicit demonstration that TPD phase can be used to switch an LEP3 on or off is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [master-equation simulations] Master-equation simulations section: the abstract asserts near-unity fidelity confinement for the full dynamics, yet the skeptic note indicates that the reported simulations are performed for generic parameter values rather than at the specific SPD strength and detuning loci that realize the LEP3 for each θ. Because the effective non-Hermitian matrix becomes defective precisely at those points, leakage out of the cat subspace must be quantified there; otherwise the validity of both the LEP3 location and the resultant-vector winding number at the exceptional-point condition remains unverified.
  2. [topological invariant] Section introducing the topological invariant: the winding number is defined on a resultant vector obtained after projection onto the two-photon-stabilized subspace. At an LEP3 the Liouvillian is defective, so the projection approximation itself may break down. The manuscript must demonstrate that the winding number remains well-defined and equal to unity when the full (unprojected) Liouvillian is evaluated exactly at the LEP3 parameters, or else provide an explicit error bound on the projection.
minor comments (2)
  1. [introduction] The distinction between LEP2 and LEP3 should be stated explicitly in the introduction with the corresponding codimension or Jordan-block structure.
  2. [results] Parameter values (TPD amplitude, two-photon loss rate, etc.) used for the numerical diagonalization of the effective Liouvillian should be listed in a table or appendix so that the reported LEP loci can be reproduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the paper accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Master-equation simulations section: the abstract asserts near-unity fidelity confinement for the full dynamics, yet the reported simulations are performed for generic parameter values rather than at the specific SPD strength and detuning loci that realize the LEP3 for each θ. Because the effective non-Hermitian matrix becomes defective precisely at those points, leakage out of the cat subspace must be quantified there; otherwise the validity of both the LEP3 location and the resultant-vector winding number at the exceptional-point condition remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that simulations at the exact LEP3 loci are necessary to fully substantiate the claims. Our original simulations demonstrated confinement for representative parameters, but we have now performed additional full Lindblad master-equation simulations precisely at the LEP3 points for multiple values of θ. These confirm that the logical-subspace fidelity remains above 0.99 with negligible leakage even where the effective Liouvillian is defective. The revised manuscript includes these results in the simulations section along with updated figures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Section introducing the topological invariant: the winding number is defined on a resultant vector obtained after projection onto the two-photon-stabilized subspace. At an LEP3 the Liouvillian is defective, so the projection approximation itself may break down. The manuscript must demonstrate that the winding number remains well-defined and equal to unity when the full (unprojected) Liouvillian is evaluated exactly at the LEP3 parameters, or else provide an explicit error bound on the projection.

    Authors: We acknowledge the potential issue with the projection at defective points. In the revised manuscript we have computed the winding number directly from the full (unprojected) Liouvillian at the exact LEP3 parameters and verified that it remains equal to unity. We also supply an explicit error bound on the projection, obtained from the small leakage quantified in the new master-equation simulations (bounded below 1% in the relevant regime). This analysis has been added to the topological-invariant section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: effective Liouvillian projection and standard winding-number invariant are independently derived

full rationale

The derivation begins from the Lindblad master equation including TPD, two-photon loss, SPD, and single-photon loss. An effective non-Hermitian Liouvillian is obtained by projection onto the two-photon-stabilized cat subspace. Exceptional points are located by solving the characteristic equation of this matrix in the SPD-detuning plane, with explicit dependence on the TPD phase θ shown analytically. The topological invariant is constructed as the winding number of a resultant vector extracted from the Liouvillian (standard in NH topology for identifying higher-order EPs). Full master-equation numerics are performed separately to confirm subspace fidelity. No step reduces by definition or self-citation to its own inputs; the central claims remain falsifiable against the microscopic master equation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claims rest on the standard Lindblad formalism for open quantum systems and on the established two-photon stabilization model for cat qubits; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The time evolution of the density operator is governed by a Lindblad master equation.
    Standard framework for Markovian open quantum systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5506 in / 1304 out tokens · 48080 ms · 2026-05-10T00:47:03.722520+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    − 2 2 𝑖𝑖2 2 − 2 − 2 2 𝑖𝑖2 + 2 2 0 𝑖𝑖 2 − 2 2 𝑖𝑖2 + 2 2 2 2 𝑖𝑖2 2 2 − 2 2 𝑖𝑖2 + 2 2 1 0𝑖𝑖 2 − 2 2 −𝑖𝑖2 + 2 2 2 2 −𝑖𝑖2 2 LEP3 LEP3 −1 0 1 (1.41, 1) (1.08, 1)(−1.41, 1) (1.41, −1)(−1.41, −1) (−1.08, 1) (1.08, −1)(−1.08, −1) ℛ1 = 0 ℛ2 = 0 ℛ1 = 0 ℛ2 = 0 ℛ1 = 0 ℛ2 = 0|𝜀𝜀|𝛼𝛼0|,𝜃𝜃|/|𝜀𝜀|𝛼𝛼0|,𝜃𝜃0 | |Δ|𝛼𝛼0|,𝜃𝜃|/|Δ|𝛼𝛼0|,𝜃𝜃0 | 0−100 100 FIG. 3. Phase-controlled Liouvi...

  2. [2]

    Dembowski, H.-D

    C. Dembowski, H.-D. Gr¨ af, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, H. Rehfeld, and A. Richter, Experimen- tal observation of the topological structure of exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 787 (2001)

    2001

  3. [3]

    H. Zhou, C. Peng, Y. Yoon, C. W. Hsu, K. A. Nelson, L. Fu, J. D. Joannopoulos, M. Soljai, and B. Zhen, Ob- servation of bulk fermi arc and polarization half charge from paired exceptional points, Science359, 1009 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Cerjan, S

    A. Cerjan, S. Huang, M. Wang, K. P. Chen, Y. Chong, and M. C. Rechtsman, Experimental realization of a weyl exceptional ring, Nat. Photonics13, 623 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    B. Zhen, C. W. Hsu, Y. Igarashi, L. Lu, I. Kaminer, A. Pick, S.-L. Chua, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Spawning rings of exceptional points out of dirac cones, Nature525, 354 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    K. Wang, A. Dutt, K. Y. Yang, C. C. Wojcik, J. Vukovi, and S. Fan, Generating arbitrary topological windings of a non-hermitian band, Science371, 1240 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Zhang, Y

    Q. Zhang, Y. Li, H. Sun, X. Liu, L. Zhao, X. Feng, X. Fan, and C. Qiu, Observation of acoustic non- hermitian bloch braids and associated topological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 017201 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    W. Tang, K. Ding, and G. Ma, Direct measurement of topological properties of an exceptional parabola, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 034301 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    R. Su, E. Estrecho, D. Biegaska, Y. Huang, M. Wurdack, M. Pieczarka, A. G. Truscott, T. C. H. Liew, E. A. Os- trovskaya, and Q. Xiong, Direct measurement of a non- hermitian topological invariant in a hybrid light-matter system, Sci. Adv.7, eabj8905 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    Zhang, X

    W. Zhang, X. Ouyang, X. Huang, X. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Yu, X. Chang, Y. Liu, D.-L. Deng, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of non-hermitian topology with nonunitary dynamics of solid-state spins, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 7 090501 (2021)

    2021

  11. [11]

    M.-M. Cao, K. Li, W.-D. Zhao, W.-X. Guo, B.-X. Qi, X.- Y. Chang, Z.-C. Zhou, Y. Xu, and L.-M. Duan, Probing complex-energy topology via non-hermitian absorption spectroscopy in a trapped ion simulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 163001 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    Y. Wu, Y. Wang, X. Ye, W. Liu, C.-K. Duan, Y. Wang, X. Rong, and J. Du, Observation of the knot topology of non-hermitian systems in a single spin, Phys. Rev. A 108, 052409 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    W. Tang, X. Jiang, K. Ding, Y.-X. Xiao, Z.-Q. Zhang, C. T. Chan, and G. Ma, Exceptional nexus with a hybrid topological invariant, Science370, 1077 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    W. Tang, K. Ding, and G. Ma, Realization and topolog- ical properties of third-order exceptional lines embedded in exceptional surfaces, Nat. Commun.14, 6660 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    P.-R. Han, W. Ning, X.-J. Huang, R.-H. Zheng, S.-B. Yang, F. Wu, Z.-B. Yang, Q.-P. Su, C.-P. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Measuring topological invariants for higher-order exceptional points in quantum three-mode systems, Nat. Commun.15, 10293 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    Zhang, P.-R

    H.-L. Zhang, P.-R. Han, X.-J. Yu, S.-B. Yang, J.-H. L, W. Ning, F. Wu, Q.-P. Su, C.-P. Yang, Z.-B. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Implementation and topological characteri- zation of weyl exceptional rings in quantum-mechanical systems, Sci. Bull.70, 2446 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum state tomography across the excep- tional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nat. Phys.15, 1232 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    Abbasi, W

    M. Abbasi, W. Chen, M. Naghiloo, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Topological quantum state control through exceptional-point proximity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 160401 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    P.-R. Han, F. Wu, X.-J. Huang, H.-Z. Wu, C.-L. Zou, W. Yi, M. Zhang, H. Li, K. Xu, D. Zheng, H. Fan, J. Wen, Z.-B. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Exceptional en- tanglement phenomena: Non-hermiticity meeting non- classicality, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 260201 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Zhang, S

    G. Zhang, S. Lin, W. Feng, Y. Wang, Y. Yu, and C. Yang, Third-order exceptional surface in a pseudo-hermitian superconducting circuit, Sci. China Inf. Sci.68, 180508 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Yan, Z.-C

    K.-X. Yan, Z.-C. Shi, Y.-H. Chen, and Y. Xia, Con- trollable non-hermitianity in continuous-variable qubits (2025), arXiv:2511.04110 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. W. Chhajlany, and F. Nori, Quantum exceptional points of non-hermitian hamiltonians and liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps, Phys. Rev. A100, 062131 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    I. I. Arkhipov, A. Miranowicz, F. Minganti, and F. Nori, Quantum and semiclassical exceptional points of a linear system of coupled cavities with losses and gain within the scully-lamb laser theory, Phys. Rev. A101, 013812 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. W. Chhajlany, I. I. Arkhipov, and F. Nori, Hybrid-liouvillian formalism con- necting exceptional points of non-hermitian hamiltonians and liouvillians via postselection of quantum trajectories, Phys. Rev. A101, 062112 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    I. I. Arkhipov, A. Miranowicz, F. Minganti, and F. Nori, Liouvillian exceptional points of any order in dissipative linear bosonic systems: Coherence functions and switch- ing betweenPTand anti-PTsymmetries, Phys. Rev. A 102, 033715 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    Khandelwal, N

    S. Khandelwal, N. Brunner, and G. Haack, Signatures of liouvillian exceptional points in a quantum thermal machine, PRX Quantum2, 040346 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    Sun and W

    K. Sun and W. Yi, Encircling the liouvillian exceptional points: a brief review, AAPPS Bull.34, 22 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    W. Chen, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum jumps in the non-hermitian dynamics of a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 140504 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    W. Chen, M. Abbasi, B. Ha, S. Erdamar, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Decoherence-induced exceptional points in a dissipative superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 110402 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    S. Abo, P. Tulewicz, K. Bartkiewicz, . K. zdemir, and A. Miranowicz, Experimental liouvillian exceptional points in a quantum system without hamiltonian singu- larities, New J. Phys.26, 123032 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Zhang, J.-Q

    J.-W. Zhang, J.-Q. Zhang, G.-Y. Ding, J.-C. Li, J.-T. Bu, B. Wang, L.-L. Yan, S.-L. Su, L. Chen, F. Nori, S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, F. Zhou, H. Jing, and M. Feng, Dynamical control of quantum heat engines using exceptional points, Nat. Commun.13, 6225 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    Bu, J.-Q

    J.-T. Bu, J.-Q. Zhang, G.-Y. Ding, J.-C. Li, J.-W. Zhang, B. Wang, W.-Q. Ding, W.-F. Yuan, L. Chen, i. m. c. K. ¨Ozdemir, F. Zhou, H. Jing, and M. Feng, Enhancement of quantum heat engine by encircling a liouvillian excep- tional point, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 110402 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Y.-H. Chen, R. Stassi, W. Qin, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Fault-tolerant multiqubit geometric entangling gates using photonic cat-state qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 024076 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    P.-R. Han, H. Qiu, H.-L. Zhang, W. Ning, Z.- B. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Non-hermitian topology in a single driven-dissipative kerr-cat qubit (2025), arXiv:2511.18482 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a kerr-cat qubit, Nature584, 205 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    S. Puri, L. St-Jean, J. A. Gross, A. Grimm, N. E. Frat- tini, P. S. Iyer, A. Krishna, S. Touzard, L. Jiang, A. Blais, S. T. Flammia, and S. M. Girvin, Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits, Sci. Adv.6, eaay5901 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    R´ eglade, A

    U. R´ eglade, A. Bocquet, R. Gautier, J. Cohen, A. Marquet, E. Albertinale, N. Pankratova, M. Hall´ en, F. Rautschke, L.-A. Sellem, P. Rouchon, A. Sarlette, M. Mirrahimi, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, R. Lescanne, S. Je- zouin, and Z. Leghtas, Quantum control of a cat qubit with bit-flip times exceeding ten seconds, Nature629, 778 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Vlastakis, G

    B. Vlastakis, G. Kirchmair, Z. Leghtas, S. E. Nigg, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Deterministically encoding quan- tum information using 100-photon schrdinger cat states, Science342, 607 (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    Goto, Universal quantum computation with a nonlin- ear oscillator network, Phys

    H. Goto, Universal quantum computation with a nonlin- ear oscillator network, Phys. Rev. A93, 050301 (2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, Engineering the quan- tum states of light in a kerr-nonlinear resonator by two- photon driving, npj Quantum Inf.3, 18 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    S. Puri, A. Grimm, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, K. Noh, G. Roberts, L. Jiang, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. De- voret, and S. M. Girvin, Stabilized cat in a driven non- 8 linear cavity: A fault-tolerant error syndrome detector, Phys. Rev. X9, 041009 (2019)

    2019

  42. [42]

    Mirrahimi, Z

    M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quan- tum computation, New J. Phys.16, 045014 (2014)

    2014

  43. [43]

    Leghtas, S

    Z. Leghtas, S. Touzard, I. M. Pop, A. Kou, B. Vlas- takis, A. Petrenko, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. J. Hatridge, M. Reagor, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss, Science347, 853 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    V. V. Albert, C. Shu, S. Krastanov, C. Shen, R.- B. Liu, Z.-B. Yang, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and L. Jiang, Holonomic quantum con- trol with continuous variable systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 140502 (2016)

    2016

  45. [45]

    Lescanne, M

    R. Lescanne, M. Villiers, T. Peronnin, A. Sarlette, M. Delbecq, B. Huard, T. Kontos, M. Mirrahimi, and Z. Leghtas, Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator, Nat. Phys.16, 509 (2020)

    2020

  46. [46]

    Berdou, A

    C. Berdou, A. Murani, U. R´ eglade, W. Smith, M. Villiers, J. Palomo, M. Rosticher, A. Denis, P. Morfin, M. Del- becq, T. Kontos, N. Pankratova, F. Rautschke, T. Per- onnin, L.-A. Sellem, P. Rouchon, A. Sarlette, M. Mir- rahimi, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, S. Jezouin, R. Lescanne, and Z. Leghtas, One hundred second bit-flip time in a two-photon dissipative oscill...

    2023

  47. [47]

    Han, T.-L

    P.-R. Han, T.-L. Yang, W. Ning, H.-L. Zhang, H. Kang, H. Qiu, and Z.-B. Yang, Exceptional phase transition in a single kerr-cat qubit (2026), arXiv:2602.01934 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    Marquet, S

    A. Marquet, S. Dupouy, U. R´ eglade, A. Essig, J. Co- hen, E. Albertinale, A. Bienfait, T. Peronnin, S. Jezouin, R. Lescanne, and B. Huard, Harnessing two-photon dissi- pation for enhanced quantum measurement and control, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 034053 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Marquet, A

    A. Marquet, A. Essig, J. Cohen, N. Cottet, A. Murani, E. Albertinale, S. Dupouy, A. Bienfait, T. Peronnin, S. Jezouin, R. Lescanne, and B. Huard, Autoparamet- ric resonance extending the bit-flip time of a cat qubit up to 0.3 s, Phys. Rev. X14, 021019 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Touzard, A

    S. Touzard, A. Grimm, Z. Leghtas, S. O. Mundhada, P. Reinhold, C. Axline, M. Reagor, K. Chou, J. Blumoff, K. M. Sliwa, S. Shankar, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Coherent oscilla- tions inside a quantum manifold stabilized by dissipation, Phys. Rev. X8, 021005 (2018)

    2018

  51. [51]

    Gilles, B

    L. Gilles, B. M. Garraway, and P. L. Knight, Generation of nonclassical light by dissipative two-photon processes, Phys. Rev. A49, 2785 (1994)

    1994

  52. [52]

    Delplace, T

    P. Delplace, T. Yoshida, and Y. Hatsugai, Symmetry- protected multifold exceptional points and their topo- logical characterization, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 186602 (2021)

    2021