pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21388 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🪐 quant-ph

Bayesian Phase Stabilization at the Shot-Noise Limit for Scalable Quantum Networks

Guang-Cheng Liu , Chao-Hui Xue , Fa-Xi Chen , Ming-Yang Zheng , Yi Yang , Li-Bo Li , Bin Wang , Bo-Wen Yang
show 6 more authors
Hai-Feng Jiang Yong Wan Ye Wang Jiu-Peng Chen Qiang Zhang Jian-Wei Pan
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords Bayesian estimationphase stabilizationshot-noise limitquantum networkstrapped ionsheralded entanglementfiber linksquantum repeaters
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bayesian phase estimator achieves shot-noise-limited stabilization from sparse single-photon detections for long-distance quantum networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a phase-stabilization approach that uses a Bayesian estimator to derive phase information from very few photon detection events. This method reaches the fundamental shot-noise limit even when the photon flux is kept low enough not to disturb quantum states, and it corrects phase drifts from both lasers and transmission fibers in real time. With this control, the system sustains interferometric visibility above 97 percent across 10 km and 100 km fiber links at a detected rate of about 1 MHz and duty cycle no higher than 6.5 percent. The resulting phase stability produces ion-ion entanglement with parity contrast over 85 percent, which meets the requirements for device-independent quantum key distribution and for quantum repeaters.

Core claim

The Bayesian phase estimator optimally extracts information from sparse detections to achieve shot-noise-limited performance, outperforming conventional maximum-likelihood estimation, and thereby enables real-time correction of phase noise for heralded entanglement generation between remote trapped-ion nodes over fiber links up to 100 km.

What carries the argument

Bayesian phase estimator, which processes sparse single-photon detection events to estimate and correct the combined phase noise from nodal lasers and fiber transmission.

If this is right

  • Interferometric visibility remains above 97% over 10 km and 100 km fibers under low photon flux.
  • Deterministic ion-ion entanglement is generated with parity contrast exceeding 85% at both distances.
  • The entanglement supports device-independent quantum key distribution.
  • Memory-memory entanglement at 10 km persists longer than the time needed to establish it, satisfying a basic repeater requirement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar Bayesian methods could extend to multi-node quantum networks coordinating several independent sources.
  • Performance might hold for other quantum platforms such as neutral atoms or superconducting circuits if photon detection remains sparse.
  • Scaling tests in networks with more than two nodes would verify whether the low-duty-cycle operation continues to prevent state disturbance.

Load-bearing premise

The Bayesian estimator extracts phase information at the shot-noise limit without degradation from unmodeled noise sources or non-stationary drifts in the actual setup.

What would settle it

If interferometric visibility falls below 97% or entanglement parity contrast drops below 85% when operating at approximately 1 MHz detected photon rate and 6.5% duty cycle over 100 km fiber, the shot-noise-limited claim would not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21388 by Bin Wang, Bo-Wen Yang, Chao-Hui Xue, Fa-Xi Chen, Guang-Cheng Liu, Hai-Feng Jiang, Jian-Wei Pan, Jiu-Peng Chen, Li-Bo Li, Ming-Yang Zheng, Qiang Zhang, Ye Wang, Yi Yang, Yong Wan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: presents a systematic comparison of conventional maximum-likelihood estimation versus our prior-assisted method incorporating outlier rejection. The simulations reveal several critical advantages of the prior-assisted ap￾proach: Conventional estimation exhibits significant performance degradation at low photon flux , where shot noise gener￾ates measurement outliers that destabilize the feedback loop. In co… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phase evolution and noise power spectral density (PSD). The measured phase evolution over time (left) and its [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Phase evolution at 0 km (baseline, no additional fiber link). The data presented on a log-log scale exhibits a linear fit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Overall experimental sequence. Following the pre-cooling stage with reference probe pulses for phase stabilization, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-precision optical phase stabilization in quantum networks is fundamentally constrained by the strict photon-flux and duty-cycle limits required to avoid disturbing fragile quantum states. This challenge becomes especially critical when coordinating multiple independent light sources for multi-step quantum protocols. Here, we develop an integrated phase-stabilization framework that incorporates a Bayesian phase estimator to optimally extract information from sparse single-photon detection events. This approach outperforms conventional maximum-likelihood estimation and achieves the shot-noise limit under minimal photon flux. The framework enables real-time correction of combined phase noise from both nodal lasers and transmission fibers, facilitating a two-step excitation protocol for heralded entanglement generation between separate trapped-ion nodes via single-photon interference. Operating with a detected photon rate of approximately 1 MHz and a duty cycle less than or equal to 6.5%, the system maintains interferometric visibility greater than 97% over fiber links of 10 km and 100 km. This phase control yields deterministic ion-ion entanglement with parity contrast exceeding 85% at both distances, enabling device-independent quantum key distribution. Moreover, the resulting memory-memory entanglement at 10 km survives beyond the average time required to establish it -- a fundamental requirement for quantum repeaters. This work establishes a robust and scalable foundation for practical long-distance quantum networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an integrated phase-stabilization framework for quantum networks that employs a Bayesian phase estimator to extract information from sparse single-photon detections. It reports achieving interferometric visibility greater than 97% and deterministic ion-ion entanglement with parity contrast exceeding 85% over 10 km and 100 km fiber links, operating at a detected photon rate of approximately 1 MHz with a duty cycle of at most 6.5%. This performance is claimed to reach the shot-noise limit, enabling device-independent quantum key distribution and memory-memory entanglement that survives the average establishment time, a key requirement for quantum repeaters.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work is significant for scalable quantum networks because it demonstrates phase stabilization under the stringent photon-flux and duty-cycle constraints needed to preserve fragile quantum states across multiple nodes. The experimental results at 100 km distances with low duty cycle provide concrete evidence of feasibility for long-haul entanglement distribution and repeater protocols. The Bayesian estimator's reported outperformance of maximum-likelihood estimation under minimal flux adds a methodological contribution that could be broadly applicable.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: The Bayesian phase estimator is stated to attain the shot-noise limit, yet the manuscript provides no explicit comparison of the measured posterior variance (or achieved phase stability) to the Cramér-Rao bound calculated from the 1 MHz detected rate and ≤6.5% duty cycle. This comparison is load-bearing for the claim that the estimator optimally extracts phase information without degradation from unmodeled noise.
  2. [Results] Results section, 100 km data: The reported visibility (>97%) and parity contrast (>85%) for the 100 km link are presented without a quantitative assessment of whether the observed variance matches the theoretical shot-noise limit at the stated flux; non-stationary fiber phase noise (e.g., temperature or vibration-induced drifts) could inflate the variance beyond the bound and directly reduce the measured contrasts.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the Bayesian approach outperforms conventional maximum-likelihood estimation but does not quantify the improvement (e.g., variance reduction factor) or the precise operating conditions under which the comparison was made.
  2. Figure legends and captions would benefit from explicit inclusion of the photon rate and duty cycle values alongside the visibility and contrast data points for immediate cross-reference with the claimed shot-noise-limited regime.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The positive assessment of the work's significance for scalable quantum networks is appreciated. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions we will implement to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: The Bayesian phase estimator is stated to attain the shot-noise limit, yet the manuscript provides no explicit comparison of the measured posterior variance (or achieved phase stability) to the Cramér-Rao bound calculated from the 1 MHz detected rate and ≤6.5% duty cycle. This comparison is load-bearing for the claim that the estimator optimally extracts phase information without degradation from unmodeled noise.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The original manuscript states that the Bayesian estimator achieves the shot-noise limit but does not include the requested explicit comparison. In the revised version, we will add this analysis to the Methods section. We will compute the Cramér-Rao bound on phase variance from the detected photon rate of ~1 MHz and duty cycle ≤6.5%, then directly compare it to the measured posterior variance of the Bayesian estimator. This will be presented in a new paragraph with supporting equations and, if space permits, an inset or supplementary figure to demonstrate that the achieved stability matches the bound without excess noise. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section, 100 km data: The reported visibility (>97%) and parity contrast (>85%) for the 100 km link are presented without a quantitative assessment of whether the observed variance matches the theoretical shot-noise limit at the stated flux; non-stationary fiber phase noise (e.g., temperature or vibration-induced drifts) could inflate the variance beyond the bound and directly reduce the measured contrasts.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative comparison for the 100 km data would strengthen the results. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the Results section to include a direct assessment of the observed phase variance (inferred from the measured visibility and parity contrast) against the shot-noise limit calculated at the experimental flux. We will also discuss the impact of non-stationary fiber noise and show that the Bayesian estimator maintains performance consistent with the bound over the measurement duration, supported by the high contrasts achieved. This addition will include error analysis and a brief discussion of how the low duty cycle and real-time correction mitigate drift effects. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain; results are experimental measurements

full rationale

The manuscript reports experimental performance of a Bayesian phase estimator in a trapped-ion entanglement setup, with central claims consisting of measured interferometric visibility (>97%) and ion-ion parity contrast (>85%) at stated photon rates, duty cycles, and fiber lengths. No load-bearing derivation, uniqueness theorem, or first-principles prediction is shown that reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-citation, or ansatz smuggled from prior work. The Bayesian estimator is described as outperforming MLE and reaching the shot-noise limit, but this is validated by direct experimental outcomes rather than tautological redefinition of inputs. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no self-definitional, fitted-prediction, or self-citation-load-bearing steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract does not introduce or detail any free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the Bayesian estimator is presented as a standard statistical tool applied to single-photon events.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5569 in / 1201 out tokens · 43219 ms · 2026-05-09T21:48:00.078888+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The quantum internet

    H Jeff Kimble. The quantum internet. Nature, 453(7198):1023–1030, 2008

    2008

  2. [2]

    Colloquium: Quan- tum networks with trapped ions

    L-M Duan and Christopher Monroe. Colloquium: Quan- tum networks with trapped ions. Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(2):1209–1224, 2010

    2010

  3. [3]

    Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet

    Koji Azuma, Sophia E Economou, David Elkouss, Paul Hilaire, Liang Jiang, Hoi-Kwong Lo, and Ilan Tz- itrin. Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet. Reviews of Modern Physics , 95(4):045006, 2023

    2023

  4. [4]

    Creation of entangled states of distant atoms by interference

    Carlos Cabrillo, J Ignacio Cirac, Pablo Garcia- Fernandez, and Peter Zoller. Creation of entangled states of distant atoms by interference. Physical Review A , 59(2):1025, 1999

    1999

  5. [5]

    Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics

    L-M Duan, Mikhail D Lukin, J Ignacio Cirac, and Peter Zoller. Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Nature, 414(6862):413–418, 2001

    2001

  6. [6]

    Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters

    Marco Lucamarini, Zhiliang L Yuan, James F Dynes, and Andrew J Shields. Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters. 7 Nature, 557(7705):400–403, 2018

    2018

  7. [7]

    Experimental quan- tum key distribution beyond the repeaterless secret key capacity

    M Minder, M Pittaluga, GL Roberts, M Lucamarini, JF Dynes, ZL Yuan, and AJ Shields. Experimental quan- tum key distribution beyond the repeaterless secret key capacity. Nature Photonics, 13(5):334, 2019

    2019

  8. [8]

    Beating the fundamental rate- distance limit in a proof-of-principle quantum key distri- bution system

    Shuang Wang, De-Yong He, Zhen-Qiang Yin, Feng-Yu Lu, Chao-Han Cui, Wei Chen, Zheng Zhou, Guang-Can Guo, and Zheng-Fu Han. Beating the fundamental rate- distance limit in a proof-of-principle quantum key distri- bution system. Physical Review X , 9(2):021046, 2019

    2019

  9. [9]

    Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution through sending or not sending

    Yang Liu, Zong-Wen Yu, Weijun Zhang, Jian-Yu Guan, Jiu-Peng Chen, Chi Zhang, Xiao-Long Hu, Hao Li, Cong Jiang, Jin Lin, et al. Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution through sending or not sending. Physical Review Letters, 123(10):100505, 2019

    2019

  10. [10]

    Implementation of quantum key distribution surpassing the linear rate-transmittance bound

    Xiao-Tian Fang, Pei Zeng, Hui Liu, Mi Zou, Weijie Wu, Yan-Lin Tang, Ying-Jie Sheng, Yao Xiang, Wei- jun Zhang, Hao Li, et al. Implementation of quantum key distribution surpassing the linear rate-transmittance bound. Nature Photonics, pages 1–4, 2020

    2020

  11. [11]

    Entanglement of two quan- tum memories via fibres over dozens of kilometres

    Yong Yu, Fei Ma, Xi-Yu Luo, Bo Jing, Peng-Fei Sun, Ren-Zhou Fang, Chao-Wei Yang, Hui Liu, Ming-Yang Zheng, Xiu-Ping Xie, et al. Entanglement of two quan- tum memories via fibres over dozens of kilometres. Na- ture, 578(7794):240–245, 2020

    2020

  12. [12]

    Entangling single atoms over 33 km telecom fibre

    Tim Van Leent, Matthias Bock, Florian Fertig, Robert Garthoff, Sebastian Eppelt, Yiru Zhou, Pooja Malik, Matthias Seubert, Tobias Bauer, Wenjamin Rosenfeld, et al. Entangling single atoms over 33 km telecom fibre. Nature, 607(7917):69–73, 2022

    2022

  13. [13]

    Metropolitan- scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits

    Arian J Stolk, Kian L van der Enden, Marie-Christine Slater, Ingmar te Raa-Derckx, Pieter Botma, Joris Van Rantwijk, JJ Benjamin Biemond, Ronald AJ Hagen, Rodolf W Herfst, Wouter D Koek, et al. Metropolitan- scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits. Science advances, 10(44):eadp6442, 2024

    2024

  14. [14]

    Enabling phase stabilization of quantum networks via displacement-enhanced photon counting

    MV Jabir, D Ahn, N Fajar R Annafianto, IA Burenkov, A Battou, and SV Polyakov. Enabling phase stabilization of quantum networks via displacement-enhanced photon counting. Optica, 12(5):570–576, 2025

    2025

  15. [15]

    Long-lived remote ion-ion entanglement for scalable quantum re- peaters

    Wen-Zhao Liu, Ya-Bin Zhou, Jiu-Peng Chen, Bin Wang, Ao Teng, Xiao-Wen Han, Guang-Cheng Liu, Zhi-Jiong Zhang, Yi Yang, Feng-Guang Liu, et al. Long-lived remote ion-ion entanglement for scalable quantum re- peaters. Nature, pages 1–3, 2026

    2026

  16. [16]

    Device-independent quantum key distribution over 100 km with single atoms

    Bo-Wei Lu, Chao-Wei Yang, Run-Qi Wang, Bo-Feng Gao, Yi-Zheng Zhen, Zhen-Gang Wang, Jia-Kai Shi, Zhong-Qi Ren, Thomas A Hahn, Ernest Y-Z Tan, et al. Device-independent quantum key distribution over 100 km with single atoms. Science, 391(6785):592–597, 2026

    2026

  17. [17]

    Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution over 1000 km fiber distance

    Yang Liu, Wei-Jun Zhang, Cong Jiang, Jiu-Peng Chen, Chi Zhang, Wen-Xin Pan, Di Ma, Hao Dong, Jia-Min Xiong, Cheng-Jun Zhang, et al. Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution over 1000 km fiber distance. Physical Review Letters , 130(21):210801, 2023

    2023

  18. [18]

    L. J. Stephenson, D. P. Nadlinger, B. C. Nichol, S. An, P. Drmota, T. G. Ballance, K. Thirumalai, J. F. Good- win, D. M. Lucas, and C. J. Ballance. High-rate, high- fidelity entanglement of qubits across an elementary quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 124:110501, Mar 2020

    2020

  19. [19]

    Experimental quantum key distribution certified by bell’s theorem

    David P Nadlinger, Peter Drmota, Bethan C Nichol, Gabriel Araneda, Dougal Main, Raghavendra Srinivas, David M Lucas, Christopher J Ballance, Kirill Ivanov, EY-Z Tan, et al. Experimental quantum key distribution certified by bell’s theorem. Nature, 607(7920):682–686, 2022

    2022

  20. [20]

    Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link

    D Main, P Drmota, DP Nadlinger, EM Ainley, A Agrawal, BC Nichol, R Srinivas, G Araneda, and DM Lucas. Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link. Nature, pages 1–6, 2025

    2025

  21. [21]

    A device-independent quantum key distribu- tion system for distant users

    Wei Zhang, Tim van Leent, Kai Redeker, Robert Garthoff, Ren´ e Schwonnek, Florian Fertig, Sebastian Ep- pelt, Wenjamin Rosenfeld, Valerio Scarani, Charles C-W Lim, et al. A device-independent quantum key distribu- tion system for distant users. Nature, 607(7920):687–691, 2022

    2022

  22. [22]

    Creation of memory–memory entan- glement in a metropolitan quantum network

    Jian-Long Liu, Xi-Yu Luo, Yong Yu, Chao-Yang Wang, Bin Wang, Yi Hu, Jun Li, Ming-Yang Zheng, Bo Yao, Zi Yan, et al. Creation of memory–memory entan- glement in a metropolitan quantum network. Nature, 629(8012):579–585, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network

    Can M Knaut, Aziza Suleymanzade, Y-C Wei, Daniel R Assumpcao, P-J Stas, Yan Qi Huan, Bartholomeus Machielse, Erik N Knall, Madison Sutula, Gefen Baranes, et al. Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network. Nature, 629(8012):573–578, 2024

    2024

  24. [24]

    Qubit teleportation between non-neighbouring nodes in a quan- tum network

    SLN Hermans, Matteo Pompili, HKC Beukers, Simon Baier, Johannes Borregaard, and Ronald Hanson. Qubit teleportation between non-neighbouring nodes in a quan- tum network. Nature, 605(7911):663–668, 2022

    2022

  25. [25]

    Phase-locking an interferometer with single-photon detections

    Bastian Hacker, Kevin G¨ unthner, Conrad R¨ oßler, and Christoph Marquardt. Phase-locking an interferometer with single-photon detections. New Journal of Physics , 25(11):113007, 2023

    2023

  26. [26]

    A single-photon source based on a single ca+ ion

    Christian Maurer, Christoph Becher, Carlos Russo, J¨ urgen Eschner, and Rainer Blatt. A single-photon source based on a single ca+ ion. New journal of physics , 6(1):94, 2004

    2004

  27. [27]

    Extendable op- tical phase synchronization of remote and independent quantum network nodes over deployed fibers

    AJ Stolk, JJB Biemond, KL van der Enden, L van Dooren, EJ van Zwet, and R Hanson. Extendable op- tical phase synchronization of remote and independent quantum network nodes over deployed fibers. Physical Review Applied, 23(1):014077, 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Toward a photonic demonstration of device-independent quantum key distribution

    Wen-Zhao Liu, Yu-Zhe Zhang, Yi-Zheng Zhen, Ming- Han Li, Yang Liu, Jingyun Fan, Feihu Xu, Qiang Zhang, and Jian-Wei Pan. Toward a photonic demonstration of device-independent quantum key distribution. Physical Review Letters, 129(5):050502, 2022

    2022

  29. [29]

    Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication

    H-J Briegel, Wolfgang D¨ ur, Juan I Cirac, and Peter Zoller. Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Physical Review Letters, 81(26):5932, 1998

    1998

  30. [30]

    Exper- imental adaptive bayesian estimation of multiple phases with limited data

    Mauro Valeri, Emanuele Polino, Davide Poderini, Ilaria Gianani, Giacomo Corrielli, Andrea Crespi, Roberto Osellame, Nicol` o Spagnolo, and Fabio Sciarrino. Exper- imental adaptive bayesian estimation of multiple phases with limited data. npj Quantum Information , 6(1):92, 2020

    2020

  31. [31]

    600 km repeater-like quantum communications with dual-band stabilisation

    Mirko Pittaluga, Mariella Minder, Marco Lucamarini, Mirko Sanzaro, Robert I Woodward, Ming-Jun Li, Zhil- iang Yuan, and Andrew J Shields. 600 km repeater-like quantum communications with dual-band stabilisation. Nature Photonics, 15:530, 2021

    2021

  32. [32]

    Twin-field quantum key dis- 8 tribution over a 511 km optical fibre linking two distant metropolitan areas

    Jiu-Peng Chen, Chi Zhang, Yang Liu, Cong Jiang, Wei- Jun Zhang, Zhi-Yong Han, Shi-Zhao Ma, Xiao-Long Hu, Yu-Huai Li, Hui Liu, et al. Twin-field quantum key dis- 8 tribution over a 511 km optical fibre linking two distant metropolitan areas. Nature Photonics, 15:570, 2021

    2021

  33. [33]

    Slodiˇ cka, G

    L. Slodiˇ cka, G. H´ etet, N. R¨ ock, P. Schindler, M. Hen- nrich, and R. Blatt. Atom-atom entanglement by single- photon detection. Physical Review Letters , 110:083603, Feb 2013

    2013

  34. [34]

    High-performance quantum frequency con- version from ultraviolet to telecom band

    Yi Yang, Bin Wang, Ji-Chao Lin, Yang Gao, Xin Li, Jiu-Peng Chen, Lei Hou, Ye Wang, Yong Wan, Xiu-Ping Xie, et al. High-performance quantum frequency con- version from ultraviolet to telecom band. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01745, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Long-distance copropa- gation of quantum key distribution and terabit classical optical data channels

    Liu-Jun Wang, Kai-Heng Zou, Wei Sun, Yingqiu Mao, Yi-Xiao Zhu, Hua-Lei Yin, Qing Chen, Yong Zhao, Fan Zhang, Teng-Yun Chen, et al. Long-distance copropa- gation of quantum key distribution and terabit classical optical data channels. Physical Review A , 95(1):012301, 2017

    2017

  36. [36]

    Sending-or-not-sending with independent lasers: Secure twin-field quantum key distribution over 509 km

    Jiu-Peng Chen, Chi Zhang, Yang Liu, Cong Jiang, Wei- jun Zhang, Xiao-Long Hu, Jian-Yu Guan, Zong-Wen Yu, Hai Xu, Jin Lin, Ming-Jun Li, Hao Chen, Hao Li, Lixing You, Zhen Wang, Xiang-Bin Wang, Qiang Zhang, and Jian-Wei Pan. Sending-or-not-sending with independent lasers: Secure twin-field quantum key distribution over 509 km. Physical Review Letters , 124:...

    2020

  37. [37]

    A ma- chine learning approach to bayesian parameter estima- tion

    Samuel Nolan, Augusto Smerzi, and Luca Pezz` e. A ma- chine learning approach to bayesian parameter estima- tion. npj Quantum Information , 7(1):169, 2021

    2021

  38. [38]

    Spero, William M

    Glenn de Vine, Brent Ware, Kirk McKenzie, Robert E. Spero, William M. Klipstein, and Daniel A. Shaddock. Experimental demonstration of time-delay interferome- try for the laser interferometer space antenna. Physical Review Letters, 104:211103, May 2010

    2010

  39. [39]

    Optical frequency metrology

    Th Udem, Ronald Holzwarth, and Theodor W H¨ ansch. Optical frequency metrology. Nature, 416(6877):233–237, 2002. Supplemental Material: Bayesian Phase Stabilization at the Shot-Noise Limit for Scalable Quantum Networks Guang-Cheng Liu, 1, 2, 4 Chao-Hui Xue, 1, 2, 3 Fa-Xi Chen,2, 3 Ming-Yang Zheng,2, 3 Yi Yang,1, 2, 3 Li-Bo Li, 3 Bin Wang,3 Bo-Wen Yang,1, ...

    2002

  40. [40]

    Measurement noise: Fundamentally bounded by the Cram´ er-Rao bound:σ2 meas ≳ 1/¯IF(τ) = (µV 2 0 τ e−Dτ )−1

  41. [41]

    The combined variance lower bound for conventional phase tracking therefore satisfies: σ2 conv(τ) ≳ 1 µV 2 0 τ e−Dτ + Dτ

    Delay-induced diffusion: Variance accumulated during signal acquisition: σ2 diffusion = Dτ . The combined variance lower bound for conventional phase tracking therefore satisfies: σ2 conv(τ) ≳ 1 µV 2 0 τ e−Dτ + Dτ. (16) Analytical minimization of this expression reveals an inescapableprecision-delay trade-off, preventing simultaneous achievement of high p...

  42. [42]

    Prediction Step: Phase evolution governed by Wiener process dynamics with diffusion coefficientD propagates the posterior variance according to the stochastic differential equation: σ2 pred = σ2 k + Dτ. (17) This prediction step systematically incorporates the fundamental physical model of phase diffusion, explicitly accounting for the temporal evolution ...

  43. [43]

    (18) where L(nk+1|ϕk+1) is the Poisson measurement likelihood and N (ϕk+1; ˆϕk, σ2 pred) is the predicted prior incor- porating phase diffusion

    Update Step: New photon count data n = (n1, n2) yields the updated posterior through rigorous application of Bayes’ theorem: p(ϕk+1|D1:k+1) ∝ L(nk+1|ϕk+1) · N (ϕk+1; ˆϕk, σ2 pred). (18) where L(nk+1|ϕk+1) is the Poisson measurement likelihood and N (ϕk+1; ˆϕk, σ2 pred) is the predicted prior incor- porating phase diffusion. For measurement regimes charact...

  44. [44]

    FI advantage

    with Poisson-distributed shot noise to stabilize the phase at π/2. The results unequivocally show the superior performance of the prior-assisted recursive Bayesian estimator. It more effectively suppresses phase diffusion in the time domain (Fig. 1a) and yields lower estimation variance across all integration times (Fig. 1b). Notably, for short integratio...

  45. [45]

    R. E. Kalman and R. S. Bucy, New results in linear filtering and prediction theory, Journal of Basic Engineering 83, 95 (1961)

    1961

  46. [46]

    Tsang, J

    M. Tsang, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Quantum theory of optical temporal phase and instantaneous frequency. ii. continuous-time limit and state-variable approach to phase-locked loop design, Phys. Rev. A 79, 053843 (2009)

    2009

  47. [47]

    K. P. Seshadreesan, S. Kim, J. P. Dowling, and H. Lee, Phase estimation at the quantum cram´ er-rao bound via parity detection, Phys. Rev. A 87, 043833 (2013)

    2013

  48. [48]

    C. A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, B. E. King, C. Langer, V. Meyer, C. J. Myatt, M. Rowe, Q. A. Turchette, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, et al. , Experimental entanglement of four particles, Nature 404, 256 (2000)

    2000

  49. [49]

    M. W. van Mourik, P. Hrmo, L. Gerster, B. Wilhelm, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, and T. Monz, rf-induced heating dynamics of noncrystallized trapped ions, Phys. Rev. A 105, 033101 (2022)

    2022