pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21398 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🧮 math.AG · math.DS· math.RA

A lower bound for polynomial volume growth of automorphisms of zero entropy

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AG math.DSmath.RA
keywords zero-entropy automorphismspolynomial volume growthprojective varietiesdynamical intersection polynomialsGelfand-Kirillov dimensionintersection numbersgap principlealgebraic dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Zero-entropy automorphisms of normal projective varieties satisfy plov(f) ≥ d + k(k+2)/4.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors aim to establish a sharp lower bound for the polynomial volume growth of zero-entropy automorphisms on normal projective varieties of dimension d. With the first-degree growth rate k defined by the asymptotic deg_1(f^n) ~ n^k, they show plov(f) is at least d plus k(k+2)/4. This matters because it provides the best possible estimate and equivalently bounds the Gelfand-Kirillov dimension of the twisted homogeneous coordinate ring from below. They develop dynamical intersection polynomials to give a new characterization of plov(f) using non-vanishing intersection numbers. The work also proves a gap principle for the possible values of plov(f) when d is at least 4.

Core claim

For a normal projective variety X of dimension d and zero-entropy automorphism f with deg_1(f^n) asymptotic to n^k, the polynomial volume growth plov(f) is at least d + k(k+2)/4. This is sharp and gives a sharp lower bound on the Gelfand-Kirillov dimension of the twisted homogeneous coordinate ring. Dynamical intersection polynomials are introduced to characterize plov(f) by the non-vanishing of intersection numbers. A gap principle holds: for d ≥ 4 either plov(f) = d^2 or plov(f) ≤ d(d-2) + 2 floor(d/4). In dimension 4 all possible values are determined.

What carries the argument

Dynamical intersection polynomials that characterize the polynomial volume growth through non-vanishing of intersection numbers.

Load-bearing premise

The first-degree growth rate k exists as the exponent where deg_1(f^n) grows like n to the power k, and the dynamical intersection polynomials satisfy the required positivity and non-vanishing conditions on the normal projective variety.

What would settle it

An explicit zero-entropy automorphism f on a projective variety of dimension d where the polynomial volume growth plov(f) is calculated to be smaller than d + k(k+2)/4 would falsify the main lower bound.

read the original abstract

Let $X$ be a normal projective variety of dimension $d$, and let $f$ be a zero-entropy automorphism of $X$. Denote by $k$ the first-degree growth rate of $f$, so that $\deg_1(f^n) \asymp n^{k}$. We prove the sharp lower bound for the polynomial volume growth $\mathrm{plov}(f)$ of $f$: \[ \mathrm{plov}(f) \ge d+\frac{k(k+2)}{4}, \] equivalently giving a sharp lower bound on the Gelfand--Kirillov dimension of the associated twisted homogeneous coordinate ring. This improves previous lower bounds of Keeler and of Lin--Oguiso--Zhang. In the proof, we introduce the notion of dynamical intersection polynomials and give a new characterization of $\mathrm{plov}(f)$ in terms of non-vanishing of intersection numbers. We also establish a gap principle for polynomial volume growth: for every fixed dimension $d\ge 4$, either $\mathrm{plov}(f)=d^2$, or $\mathrm{plov}(f)\le d(d-2) + 2\lfloor d/4 \rfloor$. This reveals a new rigidity phenomenon for zero-entropy automorphisms. As an application, in dimension $4$ we determine all possible values of $\mathrm{plov}$, thereby extending the results of Artin--Van den Bergh for surfaces and Lin--Oguiso--Zhang for threefolds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a sharp lower bound plov(f) ≥ d + k(k+2)/4 for the polynomial volume growth of a zero-entropy automorphism f of a normal projective variety X of dimension d, where k is the first-degree growth rate with deg_1(f^n) ≍ n^k. It introduces dynamical intersection polynomials to give a new characterization of plov(f) in terms of non-vanishing intersection numbers, establishes a gap principle (for d ≥ 4, either plov(f) = d² or plov(f) ≤ d(d-2) + 2⌊d/4⌋), and classifies all possible values of plov in dimension 4, improving on prior bounds of Keeler and Lin-Oguiso-Zhang. The result is equivalently phrased as a lower bound on the Gelfand-Kirillov dimension of the associated twisted homogeneous coordinate ring.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a sharp improvement on existing lower bounds and introduces dynamical intersection polynomials as a new tool extending standard intersection theory on projective varieties. The gap principle reveals a previously unobserved rigidity phenomenon for zero-entropy automorphisms, while the dimension-4 classification extends known results for surfaces and threefolds. The equivalence to Gelfand-Kirillov dimension provides a clean bridge to noncommutative algebra. These contributions are likely to influence future work on algebraic dynamics and growth rates.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The asymptotic notation ≍ in the abstract and §1 should be defined explicitly (or a reference to a standard source given) to avoid any ambiguity for readers outside algebraic dynamics.
  2. [Theorem on gap principle] In the statement of the gap principle (Theorem 1.3 or equivalent), an explicit low-dimensional example (e.g., for d=4) would help illustrate the two possible regimes and strengthen the claim of a new rigidity phenomenon.
  3. [Introduction] The comparison with previous bounds of Keeler and Lin-Oguiso-Zhang in the introduction would benefit from citing the precise statements of their theorems rather than only naming the authors.
  4. [§3] Notation for the dynamical intersection polynomials (introduced in §3) is clear once defined, but a short table summarizing their key positivity and growth properties would improve readability when they are used to characterize plov(f).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our work, the assessment of its significance, and the recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in the derivation

full rationale

The paper introduces dynamical intersection polynomials as an extension of standard intersection theory on normal projective varieties. It provides a new characterization of plov(f) via non-vanishing of intersection numbers and derives the lower bound plov(f) ≥ d + k(k+2)/4 from positivity and growth properties under the zero-entropy assumption. k is independently defined from the first-degree growth rate deg_1(f^n) ≍ n^k. No step reduces by definition or construction to the target bound, no fitted inputs are renamed as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes are invoked. The gap principle and Gelfand-Kirillov equivalence follow as direct consequences. The argument is self-contained against external benchmarks from intersection theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review performed from abstract alone; ledger therefore records only items explicitly named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard facts from algebraic geometry on normal projective varieties, intersection theory, and automorphisms
    Invoked implicitly when defining deg_1, plov, and zero entropy.
invented entities (1)
  • dynamical intersection polynomials no independent evidence
    purpose: New characterization of plov(f) via non-vanishing of intersection numbers
    Introduced in the paper to prove the lower bound and gap principle.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5576 in / 1344 out tokens · 51817 ms · 2026-05-12T02:53:37.351411+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Andrews, The theory of partitions, Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, Reprint of the 1976 original

    George E. Andrews, The theory of partitions, Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, Reprint of the 1976 original. 1634067

  2. [2]

    Artin and J

    M. Artin and J. T. Stafford, Noncommutative graded domains with quadratic growth, Invent. Math. 122 (1995), no. 2, 231--276. 1358976

  3. [3]

    Artin, J

    M. Artin, J. Tate, and M. Van den Bergh, Some algebras associated to automorphisms of elliptic curves, The G rothendieck F estschrift, V ol. I , Progr. Math., vol. 86, Birkh\" a user Boston, Boston, MA, 1990, pp. 33--85. 1086882

  4. [4]

    Artin and M

    M. Artin and M. Van den Bergh, Twisted homogeneous coordinate rings, J. Algebra 133 (1990), no. 2, 249--271. 1067406

  5. [5]

    Bass, The degree of polynomial growth of finitely generated nilpotent groups, Proc

    H. Bass, The degree of polynomial growth of finitely generated nilpotent groups, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 25 (1972), 603--614. 379672

  6. [6]

    Bell, Growth functions, Commutative algebra and noncommutative algebraic geometry

    Jason P. Bell, Growth functions, Commutative algebra and noncommutative algebraic geometry. V ol. I , Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., vol. 67, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2015, pp. 1--24. 3525466

  7. [7]

    Bell, Daniel Rogalski, and Susan J

    Jason P. Bell, Daniel Rogalski, and Susan J. Sierra, The D ixmier- M oeglin equivalence for twisted homogeneous coordinate rings , Israel J. Math. 180 (2010), 461--507. 2735073

  8. [8]

    Serge Cantat, Automorphisms and dynamics: a list of open problems, Proceedings of the I nternational C ongress of M athematicians--- R io de J aneiro 2018. V ol. II . I nvited lectures, World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, 2018, pp. 619--634. 3966782

  9. [9]

    Serge Cantat and Olga Paris-Romaskevich, Automorphisms of compact K \" a hler manifolds with slow dynamics , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 374 (2021), no. 2, 1351--1389. 4196396

  10. [10]

    Nguyen-Bac Dang, Degrees of iterates of rational maps on normal projective varieties, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 121 (2020), no. 5, 1268--1310. 4133708

  11. [11]

    Tien-Cuong Dinh, Hsueh-Yung Lin, Keiji Oguiso, and De-Qi Zhang, Zero entropy automorphisms of compact K \" a hler manifolds and dynamical filtrations , Geom. Funct. Anal. 32 (2022), no. 3, 568--594. 4431123

  12. [12]

    H \'e l \`e ne Esnault and Vasudevan Srinivas, Algebraic versus topological entropy for surfaces over finite fields, Osaka J. Math. 50 (2013), no. 3, 827--846. 3129006

  13. [13]

    Yu-Wei Fan, Lie Fu, and Genki Ouchi, Categorical polynomial entropy, Adv. Math. 383 (2021), Paper No. 107655, 50 pp. 4233273

  14. [14]

    Hautes \' E tudes Sci

    Mikha \" l Gromov, Groups of polynomial growth and expanding maps, Inst. Hautes \' E tudes Sci. Publ. Math. (1981), no. 53, 53--73. 623534

  15. [15]

    , On the entropy of holomorphic maps, Enseign. Math. (2) 49 (2003), no. 3-4, 217--235, preprint SUNY (1977). 2026895

  16. [16]

    Yves Guivarc'h, Croissance polynomiale et p\'eriodes des fonctions harmoniques, Bull. Soc. Math. France 101 (1973), 333--379. 369608

  17. [17]

    Laubenbacher, Edited and with an introduction by Bernd Sturmfels

    David Hilbert, Theory of algebraic invariants, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993, Translated from the German and with a preface by Reinhard C. Laubenbacher, Edited and with an introduction by Bernd Sturmfels. 1266168

  18. [18]

    Horn and Charles R

    Roger A. Horn and Charles R. Johnson, Matrix analysis, second ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. 2978290

  19. [19]

    Fei Hu and Chen Jiang, An upper bound for polynomial volume growth of automorphisms of zero entropy, to appear in Peking Math. J. (2025+), 27 pp., doi:10.1007/s42543-025-00106-1

  20. [20]

    Algebraic Geom

    Fei Hu, Eigenvalues and dynamical degrees of self-maps on abelian varieties, J. Algebraic Geom. 33 (2024), no. 2, 265--293. 4705374

  21. [21]

    , Polynomial volume growth of quasi-unipotent automorphisms of abelian varieties (with an appendix in collaboration with C hen J iang) , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2024), no. 8, 6374--6399. 4735629

  22. [22]

    Chen Jiang and Zhiyuan Li, Algebraic reverse K hovanskii-- T eissier inequality via O kounkov bodies , Math. Z. 305 (2023), no. 2, Paper No. 26, 14 pp. 4645768

  23. [23]

    Keeler, Criteria for -ampleness , J

    Dennis S. Keeler, Criteria for -ampleness , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 13 (2000), no. 3, 517--532. 1758752

  24. [24]

    Krause and Thomas H

    G\" u nter R. Krause and Thomas H. Lenagan, Growth of algebras and G elfand-- K irillov dimension , revised ed., Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 22, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000. 1721834

  25. [25]

    Federico Lo Bianco, On the cohomological action of automorphisms of compact K \" a hler threefolds , Bull. Soc. Math. France 147 (2019), no. 3, 469--514. 4030548

  26. [26]

    Noncommut

    Hsueh-Yung Lin, Keiji Oguiso, and De-Qi Zhang, Polynomial log-volume growth and the GK -dimensions of twisted homogeneous coordinate rings , J. Noncommut. Geom. 19 (2025), no. 2, 451--493. 4886492

  27. [27]

    Zhang, Projectively simple rings, Adv

    Zinovy Reichstein, Daniel Rogalski, and James J. Zhang, Projectively simple rings, Adv. Math. 203 (2006), no. 2, 365--407. 2227726

  28. [28]

    Agata Smoktunowicz, There are no graded domains with GK dimension strictly between 2 and 3 , Invent. Math. 164 (2006), no. 3, 635--640. 2221134

  29. [29]

    L. W. Small, J. T. Stafford, and R. B. Warfield, Jr., Affine algebras of G elfand-- K irillov dimension one are PI , Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 97 (1985), no. 3, 407--414. 778674

  30. [30]

    Stanley, Enumerative combinatorics

    Richard P. Stanley, Enumerative combinatorics. V ol. 1 , Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 49, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997, With a foreword by Gian-Carlo Rota, Corrected reprint of the 1986 original. 1442260

  31. [31]

    Reine Angew

    Tuyen Trung Truong, Relative dynamical degrees of correspondences over a field of arbitrary characteristic, J. Reine Angew. Math. 758 (2020), 139--182. 4048444

  32. [32]

    , Relations between dynamical degrees, W eil's R iemann hypothesis and the standard conjectures , Comment. Math. Helv. 100 (2025), no. 1, 61--92. 4862322

  33. [33]

    Junyi Xie, Algebraic dynamics and recursive inequalities, preprint (2024), 45 pp., arXiv:2402.12678

  34. [34]

    , Numerical spectrums control cohomological spectrums, accepted by Duke Math. J. (2026+), 18 pp., arXiv:2412.01216v2

  35. [35]

    Yosef Yomdin, Volume growth and entropy, Israel J. Math. 57 (1987), no. 3, 285--300. 889979