Thermodynamic Modeling of Pure Elements from 0 K with Uncertainty Quantification using PyCalphad and ESPEI

Abdulmonem Obaied; Alexander Richter; Allison Beese; Boris Wilthan; Irina Roslyakova; Zi-Kui Liu

arxiv: 2604.22910 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Thermodynamic Modeling of Pure Elements from 0 K with Uncertainty Quantification using PyCalphad and ESPEI

Alexander Richter , Abdulmonem Obaied , Irina Roslyakova , Boris Wilthan , Allison Beese , Zi-Kui Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 11:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords pure elementsthermodynamic modelingGibbs energy0 Kuncertainty quantificationphysics-based modelsmulticomponent systems

0 comments

The pith

Physics-based models extend thermodynamic descriptions of 41 pure elements down to 0 K with quantified uncertainties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to establish that recently proposed physics-based models for the Gibbs energy of pure elements can be systematically implemented, fitted to data, and compared in a way that also yields uncertainty estimates. It demonstrates the process by remodeling 41 elements and shows that the results make it practical to adopt these models in building descriptions for more complex material systems. A sympathetic reader would care because pure-element thermodynamics underpin all higher-order calculations for alloys and engineering materials, and extending the range to absolute zero while tracking uncertainties improves the reliability of those calculations for applications at low temperatures. The work shows how this remodeling approach supports ongoing refinement of thermodynamic databases.

Core claim

The central claim is that physics-based models for the Gibbs energy of pure elements that extend from 0 K can be implemented for systematic evaluation and comparison, with probabilistic parameter estimation enabling uncertainty quantification, as shown through remodeling of 41 elements to support more accurate and continuously improvable thermodynamic modeling of multicomponent materials.

What carries the argument

Physics-based Gibbs energy models for pure elements extended to 0 K, evaluated via probabilistic sampling that produces both fitted parameters and uncertainty estimates.

If this is right

More accurate predictions of thermodynamic properties at low temperatures for pure elements.
Quantitative criteria for choosing the best model for each element during database construction.
Streamlined updating of thermodynamic descriptions when new models or data appear.
Explicit uncertainty ranges on predictions that can be propagated into multicomponent calculations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same remodeling workflow could be applied to binary alloys to check how element-level model choices affect overall system accuracy.
Elements with limited low-temperature data could be prioritized for new experiments that would most sharply test the model rankings.
Continuous database improvement might eventually allow real-time selection of the locally best model during material design calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The physics-based models provide sufficiently accurate representations of real thermodynamic behavior from 0 K upward and the available experimental data for the 41 elements permit reliable parameter fitting and model comparison.

What would settle it

New independent low-temperature measurements, such as heat capacity values below 50 K for several of the remodeled elements, that fall outside the uncertainty bounds of the fitted models would disprove the accuracy of the implementations and comparisons.

read the original abstract

Thermodynamic modeling of pure elements is the foundation of the CALPHAD modeling of engineering materials. Recently, multiple physics-based models have been proposed to describe Gibbs energy of pure elements down to 0 K, extending from 298.15 K in the current CALPHAD modeling. To enable their systematic and quantitative comparison and adoption, those thermodynamic models of pure elements are implemented into the open-source software packages PyCalphad and ESPEI in the present work for evaluation of model parameters and model fitness. PyCalphad and ESPEI are suitable tools for implementation of these models for high throughput CALPHAD modeling of multicomponent materials. Particularly, Markov Chain Monte Carlo used in ESPEI allows for uncertainty quantification of model parameters and model predictions. Through the remodeling of 41 pure elements, the present work demonstrates the quantitative comparison of modeling of pure elements with different models and enables the efficient development of multicomponent systems with continuously improved CALPHAD description of pure elements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper integrates recently proposed low-temperature Gibbs energy models into PyCalphad and ESPEI, then remodels 41 elements with MCMC uncertainty quantification, which is practical infrastructure for CALPHAD but not a new theoretical result.

read the letter

The key point here is that the authors have integrated some recently proposed physics-based models for the Gibbs energy of pure elements down to 0 K into the open-source PyCalphad and ESPEI packages, then used them to remodel 41 elements while adding Markov Chain Monte Carlo for uncertainty quantification. This provides a practical way to compare models and quantify uncertainties in a standardized software environment.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the implementation of recently proposed physics-based models for the Gibbs energy of pure elements from 0 K into the open-source PyCalphad and ESPEI packages. It demonstrates the approach by remodeling 41 pure elements, employing Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling for uncertainty quantification of parameters and predictions, with the goal of enabling systematic quantitative model comparisons and supporting improved multicomponent CALPHAD database development.

Significance. If the implementations are correct and the remodeling yields reliable comparisons, the work is significant for the CALPHAD community because it extends thermodynamic modeling to cryogenic temperatures while providing quantified uncertainties. Explicit credit is due for the open-source implementation in established high-throughput tools, the use of MCMC for UQ, and the scale of the demonstration across 41 elements, all of which promote reproducibility and adoption.

minor comments (3)

Abstract: the claim of 'quantitative comparison' would be strengthened by briefly naming the specific physics-based models implemented and indicating the primary metrics used for fitness evaluation across the 41 elements.
The manuscript would benefit from a summary table (perhaps in the results section) listing key fitted parameters, their uncertainties, and model fitness metrics for representative elements to make the quantitative comparisons more accessible.
Figure captions and text should explicitly note whether uncertainty bands from the MCMC analysis are shown in all model-fit plots; if not, this should be added for consistency with the UQ emphasis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. The referee summary correctly identifies the core contributions: implementation of physics-based 0 K Gibbs energy models for pure elements in PyCalphad and ESPEI, MCMC-based uncertainty quantification, and the demonstration across 41 elements to support improved multicomponent CALPHAD work. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The manuscript is an implementation and demonstration paper: it ports recently proposed physics-based Gibbs energy models into PyCalphad/ESPEI, performs parameter optimization against external experimental data for 41 elements, and reports model fitness metrics plus uncertainty quantification via MCMC. No equation or central claim reduces to a fitted quantity by construction, nor does any result rely on a self-citation chain that itself lacks independent verification. Model comparisons are performed by direct evaluation against the same external datasets used for fitting, which is standard practice and does not constitute circularity. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the physics-based models are valid across the full temperature range and that standard CALPHAD data for the 41 elements are adequate for fitting.

free parameters (1)

model-specific parameters for each element
Each of the 41 elements requires fitted coefficients for the chosen thermodynamic model; these are determined from data within the remodeling process.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The recently proposed physics-based models correctly describe Gibbs energy from 0 K to high temperatures for pure elements.
Invoked when the models are implemented and used for remodeling; no independent verification of model validity is described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5498 in / 1197 out tokens · 54452 ms · 2026-05-08T11:06:13.931050+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

[1]

The default models of pure elements in PyCalphad and ESPEI are the SGTE91 database

and ESPEI[44], [45] have been developed with PyCalphad for thermodynamic models and calculations and ESPEI for efficient evaluations of model parameters using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations and JSON files for the repository of input data. The default models of pure elements in PyCalphad and ESPEI are the SGTE91 database. These open-source pyt...

work page
[2]

Kaufman and H

L. Kaufman and H. Bernstein, Computer calculation of phase diagrams with special reference to refractory metals. 1970

work page 1970
[3]

CALPHAD--A Comprehensive Guide,

N. Saunders and a. P. Miodownik, “CALPHAD--A Comprehensive Guide,” vol. 1, pp. 1– 479, 1998, Accessed: Sep. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735821098800095

work page 1998
[4]

H. L. Lukas, S. G. Fries, and B. Sundman, Computational thermodynamics: The Calphad method, vol. 9780521868. Cambridge University Press, 2007. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511804137

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804137 2007
[5]

Computational Thermodynamics of Materials,

Z.-K. Liu and Y. Wang, “Computational Thermodynamics of Materials,” Comput. Thermodyn. Mater., Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139018265. 25

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139018265 2016
[6]

Computational Design of Hierarchically Structured Materials,

G. B. Olson, “Computational Design of Hierarchically Structured Materials,” Science (80- . )., vol. 277, no. 5330, pp. 1237–1242, Aug. 1997, doi: 10.1126/science.277.5330.1237

work page doi:10.1126/science.277.5330.1237 1997
[7]

N. R. C. Committee on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering, Integrated computational materials engineering: a transformational discipline for improved competitiveness and national security. National Academies Press Washington, DC, 2008

work page 2008
[8]

Materials Genome Initiative for Global Competitiveness,

C. Kalil Tom And Wadia, “Materials Genome Initiative for Global Competitiveness,” Genome, no. June, pp. 1–18, 2011, [Online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/materials_genome_initiative -final.pdf

work page 2011
[9]

The lattice stability of metals—I. Titanium and zirconium,

L. Kaufman, “The lattice stability of metals—I. Titanium and zirconium,” Acta Metall., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 575–587, Aug. 1959, doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(59)90195-6

work page doi:10.1016/0001-6160(59)90195-6 1959
[10]

Thermodynamics and its prediction and CALPHAD modeling: Review, state of the art, and perspectives,

Z. K. Liu, “Thermodynamics and its prediction and CALPHAD modeling: Review, state of the art, and perspectives,” in Zentropy: Theory and Fundamentals, New York: Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2024, pp. 273–348. doi: 10.1201/9781032692401-5

work page doi:10.1201/9781032692401-5 2024
[11]

Multiscale entropy and its implications to critical phenomena, emergent behaviors, and information,

Z.-K. Liu, “On Gibbs Equilibrium and Hillert Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics,” J. Phase Equilibria Diffus., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 965–985, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11669- 024-01157-0

work page doi:10.1007/s11669- 2024
[12]

Genomic materials design: Calculation of phase dynamics,

G. B. Olson and Z. K. Liu, “Genomic materials design: Calculation of phase dynamics,” in Zentropy: Tools, Modelling, and Applications, Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2024, pp. 275–307. doi: 10.1201/9781003514466-14

work page doi:10.1201/9781003514466-14 2024
[13]

Hack, The SGTE Casebook: Thermodynamics at Work

K. Hack, The SGTE Casebook: Thermodynamics at Work. Woodhead Pub. ; CRC Press,

work page
[14]

doi: 10.1201/9781003575917

work page doi:10.1201/9781003575917
[15]

The development of phase-based property 26 data using the CALPHAD method and infrastructure needs,

C. E. Campbell, U. R. Kattner, and Z. K. Liu, “The development of phase-based property 26 data using the CALPHAD method and infrastructure needs,” in Zentropy: Tools, Modelling, and Applications, vol. 3, Springer, 2024, pp. 621–660. doi: 10.1201/9781003514466-28

work page doi:10.1201/9781003514466-28 2024
[16]

File and data repositories for Next Generation CALPHAD,

C. E. Campbell, U. R. Kattner, and Z. K. Liu, “File and data repositories for Next Generation CALPHAD,” Scr. Mater., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 7–11, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.06.013

work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.06.013 2014
[17]

SGTE data for pure elements,

A. T. Dinsdale, “SGTE data for pure elements,” Calphad, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 317–425, 1991, doi: 10.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-N

work page doi:10.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-n 1991
[18]

The stability of metallic phases,

L. Kaufman, “The stability of metallic phases,” Prog. Mater. Sci., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 57– 96, Jan. 1969, doi: 10.1016/0079-6425(69)90001-2

work page doi:10.1016/0079-6425(69)90001-2 1969
[19]

NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables

“NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables.” Accessed: Sep. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://janaf.nist.gov/

work page 2025
[20]

The origins, growth and current industrial impact of Calphad,

P. J. Spencer, “The origins, growth and current industrial impact of Calphad,” Calphad, vol. 79, p. 102489, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.CALPHAD.2022.102489

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102489 2022
[21]

Physical Review 136(3B), B864–B871 (1964)

I. E. Gaa, P. Hohenbergt Ecole, X. Superzeure, I’aris, F. And, and W. Konnt, “Inhomogeneous Electron Gas,” Phys. Rev., vol. 136, no. 3B, p. B864, Nov. 1964, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b864 1964
[22]

Physical Review , author =

W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, “Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects,” Phys. Rev., vol. 140, no. 4A, p. A1133, Nov. 1965, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 1965
[23]

First-principles calculations and CALPHAD modeling of thermodynamics,

Z.-K. Liu, “First-principles calculations and CALPHAD modeling of thermodynamics,” J. phase equilibria Diffus., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 517–534, 2009

work page 2009
[24]

Workshop on thermodynamic models and data for pure elements and other endmembers 27 of solutions: Schloβ Ringberg, Feb. 26 to March 3, 1995,

“Workshop on thermodynamic models and data for pure elements and other endmembers 27 of solutions: Schloβ Ringberg, Feb. 26 to March 3, 1995,” Calphad, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 437–447, 1995, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-5916(96)00002-8

work page doi:10.1016/0364-5916(96)00002-8 1995
[25]

Modeling of thermodynamic properties for Bcc, Fcc, liquid, and amorphous iron,

Q. Chen and B. Sundman, “Modeling of thermodynamic properties for Bcc, Fcc, liquid, and amorphous iron,” J. Phase Equilibria, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 631–644, 2001, doi: 10.1007/s11669-001-0027-9

work page doi:10.1007/s11669-001-0027-9 2001
[26]

Modeling of Gibbs energies of pure elements down to 0 K using segmented regression,

I. Roslyakova, B. Sundman, H. Dette, L. Zhang, and I. Steinbach, “Modeling of Gibbs energies of pure elements down to 0 K using segmented regression,” Calphad, vol. 55, pp. 165–180, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2016.09.001

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2016.09.001 2016
[28]

Thermodynamic re-assessment of binary Cr-Nb system down to 0 K,

Y. Jiang, S. Zomorodpoosh, I. Roslyakova, and L. Zhang, “Thermodynamic re-assessment of binary Cr-Nb system down to 0 K,” Calphad, vol. 62, pp. 109–118, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2018.06.001

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2018.06.001 2018
[29]

Third-Generation Thermodynamic Descriptions for Ta-Cr and Ta-V Binary Systems,

E. Zhang, X. Xu, Y. Chen, and Y. Tang, “Third-Generation Thermodynamic Descriptions for Ta-Cr and Ta-V Binary Systems,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ma15062074

work page doi:10.3390/ma15062074 2022
[30]

A thermodynamic assessment of the binary Fe-Mn system for the third generation of Calphad databases,

S. Bigdeli and M. Selleby, “A thermodynamic assessment of the binary Fe-Mn system for the third generation of Calphad databases,” Calphad, vol. 64, pp. 185–195, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.CALPHAD.2018.11.011

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2018.11.011 2019
[31]

A third generation CalPhaD assessment of the Fe–Mn–Ti system part I: The binary subsystems Fe–Mn, Fe–Ti and Mn–Ti,

A. Walnsch, A. Leineweber, and M. J. Kriegel, “A third generation CalPhaD assessment of the Fe–Mn–Ti system part I: The binary subsystems Fe–Mn, Fe–Ti and Mn–Ti,” Calphad, vol. 81, p. 102555, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102555. 28

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102555 2023
[32]

Thermodynamic modelling of the Ca–O system including 3rd generation description of CaO and CaO2,

G. Deffrennes et al., “Thermodynamic modelling of the Ca–O system including 3rd generation description of CaO and CaO2,” Calphad, vol. 69, p. 101764, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101764

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101764 2020
[33]

From Zero Kelvin Upwards: Thermodynamic Modeling of the Mn-Ni System with Third Generation Calphad Models,

L. Hao, S. Bigdeli, and W. Xiong, “From Zero Kelvin Upwards: Thermodynamic Modeling of the Mn-Ni System with Third Generation Calphad Models,” J. Phase Equilibria Diffus., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1182–1193, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11669-024- 01165-0

work page doi:10.1007/s11669-024- 2024
[34]

The third generation Calphad description of Al–C including revisions of pure Al and C,

Z. He, B. Kaplan, H. Mao, and M. Selleby, “The third generation Calphad description of Al–C including revisions of pure Al and C,” Calphad, vol. 72, p. 102250, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2021.102250

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2021.102250 2021
[35]

Third generation Calphad: Thermodynamic assessment of the Ni-Ga system with physics-based models,

L. Hao, C. Shen, N. M. Fortunato, H. Zhang, and W. Xiong, “Third generation Calphad: Thermodynamic assessment of the Ni-Ga system with physics-based models,” Calphad, vol. 88, p. 102797, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2024.102797

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2024.102797 2025
[36]

A third generation Calphad description of W–C including a revision of liquid C,

Z. He and M. Selleby, “A third generation Calphad description of W–C including a revision of liquid C,” Calphad, vol. 78, p. 102449, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102449

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102449 2022
[37]

Use of third generation data for the elements to model the thermodynamics of binary alloy systems: Part 2 – The critical assessment of data for the Pb-Sn system,

A. V. Khvan, A. T. Dinsdale, and Q. Chen, “Use of third generation data for the elements to model the thermodynamics of binary alloy systems: Part 2 – The critical assessment of data for the Pb-Sn system,” Calphad, vol. 76, p. 102396, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102396

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102396 2022
[38]

Use of third generation data for the elements to model the thermodynamics of binary alloy systems: Part 1 – The critical assessment of data for the Al-Zn system,

A. Dinsdale, O. Zobac, A. Kroupa, and A. Khvan, “Use of third generation data for the elements to model the thermodynamics of binary alloy systems: Part 1 – The critical assessment of data for the Al-Zn system,” Calphad, vol. 68, p. 101723, Mar. 2020, doi: 29 10.1016/j.calphad.2019.101723

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.101723 2020
[39]

A third generation CalPhaD assessment of the Fe–Mn–Ti system Part II: The ternary system Fe–Mn–Ti,

A. Walnsch, A. Leineweber, and M. J. Kriegel, “A third generation CalPhaD assessment of the Fe–Mn–Ti system Part II: The ternary system Fe–Mn–Ti,” Calphad, vol. 81, p. 102553, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.CALPHAD.2023.102553

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102553 2023
[40]

Use of third generation data for the pure elements to model the thermodynamics of binary alloy systems: Part 3 – The theoretical prediction of the Al–Si–Zn system,

O. Zobac, A. Kroupa, and A. Dinsdale, “Use of third generation data for the pure elements to model the thermodynamics of binary alloy systems: Part 3 – The theoretical prediction of the Al–Si–Zn system,” Calphad, vol. 87, p. 102742, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2024.102742

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2024.102742 2024
[41]

On phase stability of Mo-Nb-Ta-W refractory high entropy alloys,

E. Zhang, Y. Tang, M. Wen, A. Obaied, I. Roslyakova, and L. Zhang, “On phase stability of Mo-Nb-Ta-W refractory high entropy alloys,” Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater., vol. 103, p. 105780, Feb. 2022, Accessed: Dec. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026343682200004X

work page 2022
[42]

Third-generation thermodynamic descriptions of MoNbTaWHfZr refractory high entropy alloys and their phase stability,

J.-H. Gao, E.-K. Zhang, Y. Tang, L.-J. Zhang, J. Ding, and X.-C. Xia, “Third-generation thermodynamic descriptions of MoNbTaWHfZr refractory high entropy alloys and their phase stability,” Tungsten, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 582–600, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s42864- 024-00311-y

work page doi:10.1007/s42864- 2025
[43]

Thermodynamic Modeling of the Ti-Hf-Zr-Nb-Ta Refractory High Entropy Alloy and Its Application in Analyzing Phase Stability,

J. Ding, J. Gao, E. Zhang, Y. Tang, L. Zhang, and X. Xia, “Thermodynamic Modeling of the Ti-Hf-Zr-Nb-Ta Refractory High Entropy Alloy and Its Application in Analyzing Phase Stability,” Comput. Mater. Contin., vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 539–556, 2025, doi: 10.32604/cmc.2025.067266

work page doi:10.32604/cmc.2025.067266 2025
[44]

pycalphad: CALPHAD-based Computational Thermodynamics in Python,

R. Otis and Z. Liu, “pycalphad: CALPHAD-based Computational Thermodynamics in Python,” J. Open Res. Softw., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.5334/jors.140

work page doi:10.5334/jors.140 2017
[45]

PyCalphad: Python library for computational thermodynamics using the CALPHAD 30 method

“PyCalphad: Python library for computational thermodynamics using the CALPHAD 30 method.” [Online]. Available: https://pycalphad.org

work page
[46]

ESPEI for efficient thermodynamic database development, modification, and uncertainty quantification: application to Cu–Mg,

B. Bocklund, R. Otis, A. Egorov, A. Obaied, I. Roslyakova, and Z.-K. Liu, “ESPEI for efficient thermodynamic database development, modification, and uncertainty quantification: application to Cu–Mg,” MRS Commun., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 618–627, 2019, doi: 10.1557/mrc.2019.59

work page doi:10.1557/mrc.2019.59 2019
[47]

ESPEI: Extensible Self-optimizing Phase Equilibria Infrastructure

“ESPEI: Extensible Self-optimizing Phase Equilibria Infrastructure.” [Online]. Available: https://espei.org

work page
[48]

Thermodynamic properties of al, ni, nial, and ni3al from first-principles calculations,

Y. Wang, Z. K. Liu, and L. Q. Chen, “Thermodynamic properties of Al, Ni, NiAl, and Ni3Al from first-principles calculations,” Acta Mater., vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 2665–2671, May 2004, doi: 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2004.02.014

work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.014 2004
[49]

Extensible Structure-Informed Prediction of Formation Energy with improved accuracy and usability employing neural networks,

A. M. Krajewski, J. W. Siegel, J. Xu, and Z.-K. Liu, “Extensible Structure-Informed Prediction of Formation Energy with improved accuracy and usability employing neural networks,” Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 208, p. 111254, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111254

work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111254 2022
[50]

Nature Machine Intelligence5(9), 1031– 1041 (2023)

B. Deng et al., “CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge- informed atomistic modelling,” Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1031–1041, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s42256-023-00716-3

work page doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00716-3 2023
[51]

Efficient structure-informed featurization and property prediction of ordered, dilute, and random atomic structures,

A. M. Krajewski, J. W. Siegel, and Z. K. Liu, “Efficient structure-informed featurization and property prediction of ordered, dilute, and random atomic structures,” Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 247, p. 113495, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2024.113495

work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113495 2025
[52]

Thermodynamics of the Ce γ-α transition: Density-functional study,

Y. Wang, L. G. Hector, H. Zhang, S. L. Shang, L. Q. Chen, and Z. K. Liu, “Thermodynamics of the Ce γ-α transition: Density-functional study,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 78, no. 10, p. 104113, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.104113. 31

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.104113 2008
[53]

A thermodynamic framework for a system with itinerant-electron magnetism,

Y. Wang, L. G. Hector, H. Zhang, S. L. Shang, L. Q. Chen, and Z. K. Liu, “A thermodynamic framework for a system with itinerant-electron magnetism,” in Zentropy: Theory and Fundamentals, Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2024, pp. 539–556. doi: 10.1201/9781032692401-15

work page doi:10.1201/9781032692401-15 2024
[54]

Zentropy Theory for Positive and Negative Thermal Expansion,

Z.-K. Liu, Y. Wang, and S.-L. Shang, “Zentropy Theory for Positive and Negative Thermal Expansion,” in Zentropy, vol. 43, no. 6, New York: Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2024, pp. 497–514. doi: 10.1201/9781032692401-13

work page doi:10.1201/9781032692401-13 2024
[55]

Quantitative predictive theories through integrating quantum, statistical, equilibrium, and nonequilibrium thermodynamics,

Z.-K. Liu, “Quantitative predictive theories through integrating quantum, statistical, equilibrium, and nonequilibrium thermodynamics,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 36, no. 34, p. 343003, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ad4762

work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ad4762 2024
[56]

Ocean of Data: Integrating First-Principles Calculations and CALPHAD Modeling with Machine Learning,

Z. K. Liu, “Ocean of Data: Integrating First-Principles Calculations and CALPHAD Modeling with Machine Learning,” J. Phase Equilibria Diffus., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 635– 649, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1007/S11669-018-0654-Z/FIGURES/8

work page doi:10.1007/s11669-018-0654-z/figures/8 2018
[57]

NIST alloy data,

B. Wilthan, “NIST alloy data,” National Institute of Standards and Technology. Accessed: Nov. 03, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.18434/M32153

work page doi:10.18434/m32153 2024
[58]

Grimvall, Thermophysical properties of materials

G. Grimvall, Thermophysical properties of materials. Elsevier, 1999

work page 1999
[59]

A model for alloying in ferromagnetic metals,

M. Hillert and M. Jarl, “A model for alloying in ferromagnetic metals,” Calphad, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 227–238, Jan. 1978, doi: 10.1016/0364-5916(78)90011-1

work page doi:10.1016/0364-5916(78)90011-1 1978
[60]

An improved magnetic model for thermodynamic modeling,

W. Xiong, Q. Chen, P. A. Korzhavyi, and M. Selleby, “An improved magnetic model for thermodynamic modeling,” Calphad, vol. 39, pp. 11–20, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2012.07.002

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.07.002 2012
[61]

Unifying the derivations for the Akaike and corrected Akaike information criteria,

J. E. Cavanaugh, “Unifying the derivations for the Akaike and corrected Akaike information criteria,” Stat. Probab. Lett., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 201–208, 1997, doi: 32 10.1016/s0167-7152(96)00128-9

work page doi:10.1016/s0167-7152(96)00128-9 1997
[62]

Burnham and David R

K. P. Burnham and D. R. Anderson, “Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection,” 2004, Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA. doi: 10.1177/0049124104268644

work page doi:10.1177/0049124104268644 2004
[63]

Gelman, J

A. Gelman, J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, and D. B. Rubin, Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1995

work page 1995
[64]

Quantified uncertainty in thermodynamic modeling for materials design,

N. H. Paulson, B. J. Bocklund, R. A. Otis, Z.-K. Liu, and M. Stan, “Quantified uncertainty in thermodynamic modeling for materials design,” Acta Mater., vol. 174, pp. 9–15, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.017

work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.017 2019
[65]

Comparison of statistically-based methods for automated weighting of experimental data in CALPHAD- type assessment,

N. H. Paulson, S. Zomorodpoosh, I. Roslyakova, and M. Stan, “Comparison of statistically-based methods for automated weighting of experimental data in CALPHAD- type assessment,” Calphad, vol. 68, p. 101728, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2019.101728

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.101728 2020
[66]

Thermodynamic re-assessment of pure chromium using modified segmented regression model,

A. Obaied et al., “Thermodynamic re-assessment of pure chromium using modified segmented regression model,” Calphad, vol. 69, p. 101762, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101762

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101762 2020
[67]

PureElementPRL,

A. Richter, “PureElementPRL,” Jan. 09, 2026, GitHub. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/amr8004/PureElementPRL

work page 2026
[68]

Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed

C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2005

work page 2005
[69]

An insight into using DFT data for Calphad modeling of solid phases in the third generation of Calphad databases, a case study for Al,

S. Bigdeli et al., “An insight into using DFT data for Calphad modeling of solid phases in the third generation of Calphad databases, a case study for Al,” Calphad, vol. 65, pp. 79– 85, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2019.02.008. 33

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.02.008 2019
[70]

Thermodynamic modeling of the LiCl-KCl-LaCl3 system with Bayesian model selection and uncertainty quantification,

R. Gong et al., “Thermodynamic modeling of the LiCl-KCl-LaCl3 system with Bayesian model selection and uncertainty quantification,” J. Mol. Liq., vol. 432, p. 127811, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2025.127811. 34 10 Figures Figure 1 Circled systems to be remodeled in a hypothetical 6 element database of A-B-C-D-E-F, if the thermodynamic description of ...

work page doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127811 2025

[1] [1]

The default models of pure elements in PyCalphad and ESPEI are the SGTE91 database

and ESPEI[44], [45] have been developed with PyCalphad for thermodynamic models and calculations and ESPEI for efficient evaluations of model parameters using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations and JSON files for the repository of input data. The default models of pure elements in PyCalphad and ESPEI are the SGTE91 database. These open-source pyt...

work page

[2] [2]

Kaufman and H

L. Kaufman and H. Bernstein, Computer calculation of phase diagrams with special reference to refractory metals. 1970

work page 1970

[3] [3]

CALPHAD--A Comprehensive Guide,

N. Saunders and a. P. Miodownik, “CALPHAD--A Comprehensive Guide,” vol. 1, pp. 1– 479, 1998, Accessed: Sep. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735821098800095

work page 1998

[4] [4]

H. L. Lukas, S. G. Fries, and B. Sundman, Computational thermodynamics: The Calphad method, vol. 9780521868. Cambridge University Press, 2007. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511804137

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804137 2007

[5] [5]

Computational Thermodynamics of Materials,

Z.-K. Liu and Y. Wang, “Computational Thermodynamics of Materials,” Comput. Thermodyn. Mater., Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139018265. 25

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139018265 2016

[6] [6]

Computational Design of Hierarchically Structured Materials,

G. B. Olson, “Computational Design of Hierarchically Structured Materials,” Science (80- . )., vol. 277, no. 5330, pp. 1237–1242, Aug. 1997, doi: 10.1126/science.277.5330.1237

work page doi:10.1126/science.277.5330.1237 1997

[7] [7]

N. R. C. Committee on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering, Integrated computational materials engineering: a transformational discipline for improved competitiveness and national security. National Academies Press Washington, DC, 2008

work page 2008

[8] [8]

Materials Genome Initiative for Global Competitiveness,

C. Kalil Tom And Wadia, “Materials Genome Initiative for Global Competitiveness,” Genome, no. June, pp. 1–18, 2011, [Online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/materials_genome_initiative -final.pdf

work page 2011

[9] [9]

The lattice stability of metals—I. Titanium and zirconium,

L. Kaufman, “The lattice stability of metals—I. Titanium and zirconium,” Acta Metall., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 575–587, Aug. 1959, doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(59)90195-6

work page doi:10.1016/0001-6160(59)90195-6 1959

[10] [10]

Thermodynamics and its prediction and CALPHAD modeling: Review, state of the art, and perspectives,

Z. K. Liu, “Thermodynamics and its prediction and CALPHAD modeling: Review, state of the art, and perspectives,” in Zentropy: Theory and Fundamentals, New York: Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2024, pp. 273–348. doi: 10.1201/9781032692401-5

work page doi:10.1201/9781032692401-5 2024

[11] [11]

Multiscale entropy and its implications to critical phenomena, emergent behaviors, and information,

Z.-K. Liu, “On Gibbs Equilibrium and Hillert Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics,” J. Phase Equilibria Diffus., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 965–985, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11669- 024-01157-0

work page doi:10.1007/s11669- 2024

[12] [12]

Genomic materials design: Calculation of phase dynamics,

G. B. Olson and Z. K. Liu, “Genomic materials design: Calculation of phase dynamics,” in Zentropy: Tools, Modelling, and Applications, Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2024, pp. 275–307. doi: 10.1201/9781003514466-14

work page doi:10.1201/9781003514466-14 2024

[13] [13]

Hack, The SGTE Casebook: Thermodynamics at Work

K. Hack, The SGTE Casebook: Thermodynamics at Work. Woodhead Pub. ; CRC Press,

work page

[14] [14]

doi: 10.1201/9781003575917

work page doi:10.1201/9781003575917

[15] [15]

The development of phase-based property 26 data using the CALPHAD method and infrastructure needs,

C. E. Campbell, U. R. Kattner, and Z. K. Liu, “The development of phase-based property 26 data using the CALPHAD method and infrastructure needs,” in Zentropy: Tools, Modelling, and Applications, vol. 3, Springer, 2024, pp. 621–660. doi: 10.1201/9781003514466-28

work page doi:10.1201/9781003514466-28 2024

[16] [16]

File and data repositories for Next Generation CALPHAD,

C. E. Campbell, U. R. Kattner, and Z. K. Liu, “File and data repositories for Next Generation CALPHAD,” Scr. Mater., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 7–11, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.06.013

work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.06.013 2014

[17] [17]

SGTE data for pure elements,

A. T. Dinsdale, “SGTE data for pure elements,” Calphad, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 317–425, 1991, doi: 10.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-N

work page doi:10.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-n 1991

[18] [18]

The stability of metallic phases,

L. Kaufman, “The stability of metallic phases,” Prog. Mater. Sci., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 57– 96, Jan. 1969, doi: 10.1016/0079-6425(69)90001-2

work page doi:10.1016/0079-6425(69)90001-2 1969

[19] [19]

NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables

“NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables.” Accessed: Sep. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://janaf.nist.gov/

work page 2025

[20] [20]

The origins, growth and current industrial impact of Calphad,

P. J. Spencer, “The origins, growth and current industrial impact of Calphad,” Calphad, vol. 79, p. 102489, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.CALPHAD.2022.102489

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102489 2022

[21] [21]

Physical Review 136(3B), B864–B871 (1964)

I. E. Gaa, P. Hohenbergt Ecole, X. Superzeure, I’aris, F. And, and W. Konnt, “Inhomogeneous Electron Gas,” Phys. Rev., vol. 136, no. 3B, p. B864, Nov. 1964, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b864 1964

[22] [22]

Physical Review , author =

W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, “Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects,” Phys. Rev., vol. 140, no. 4A, p. A1133, Nov. 1965, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 1965

[23] [23]

First-principles calculations and CALPHAD modeling of thermodynamics,

Z.-K. Liu, “First-principles calculations and CALPHAD modeling of thermodynamics,” J. phase equilibria Diffus., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 517–534, 2009

work page 2009

[24] [24]

Workshop on thermodynamic models and data for pure elements and other endmembers 27 of solutions: Schloβ Ringberg, Feb. 26 to March 3, 1995,

“Workshop on thermodynamic models and data for pure elements and other endmembers 27 of solutions: Schloβ Ringberg, Feb. 26 to March 3, 1995,” Calphad, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 437–447, 1995, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-5916(96)00002-8

work page doi:10.1016/0364-5916(96)00002-8 1995

[25] [25]

Modeling of thermodynamic properties for Bcc, Fcc, liquid, and amorphous iron,

Q. Chen and B. Sundman, “Modeling of thermodynamic properties for Bcc, Fcc, liquid, and amorphous iron,” J. Phase Equilibria, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 631–644, 2001, doi: 10.1007/s11669-001-0027-9

work page doi:10.1007/s11669-001-0027-9 2001

[26] [26]

Modeling of Gibbs energies of pure elements down to 0 K using segmented regression,

I. Roslyakova, B. Sundman, H. Dette, L. Zhang, and I. Steinbach, “Modeling of Gibbs energies of pure elements down to 0 K using segmented regression,” Calphad, vol. 55, pp. 165–180, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2016.09.001

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2016.09.001 2016

[27] [28]

Thermodynamic re-assessment of binary Cr-Nb system down to 0 K,

Y. Jiang, S. Zomorodpoosh, I. Roslyakova, and L. Zhang, “Thermodynamic re-assessment of binary Cr-Nb system down to 0 K,” Calphad, vol. 62, pp. 109–118, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2018.06.001

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2018.06.001 2018

[28] [29]

Third-Generation Thermodynamic Descriptions for Ta-Cr and Ta-V Binary Systems,

E. Zhang, X. Xu, Y. Chen, and Y. Tang, “Third-Generation Thermodynamic Descriptions for Ta-Cr and Ta-V Binary Systems,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ma15062074

work page doi:10.3390/ma15062074 2022

[29] [30]

A thermodynamic assessment of the binary Fe-Mn system for the third generation of Calphad databases,

S. Bigdeli and M. Selleby, “A thermodynamic assessment of the binary Fe-Mn system for the third generation of Calphad databases,” Calphad, vol. 64, pp. 185–195, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.CALPHAD.2018.11.011

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2018.11.011 2019

[30] [31]

A third generation CalPhaD assessment of the Fe–Mn–Ti system part I: The binary subsystems Fe–Mn, Fe–Ti and Mn–Ti,

A. Walnsch, A. Leineweber, and M. J. Kriegel, “A third generation CalPhaD assessment of the Fe–Mn–Ti system part I: The binary subsystems Fe–Mn, Fe–Ti and Mn–Ti,” Calphad, vol. 81, p. 102555, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102555. 28

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102555 2023

[31] [32]

Thermodynamic modelling of the Ca–O system including 3rd generation description of CaO and CaO2,

G. Deffrennes et al., “Thermodynamic modelling of the Ca–O system including 3rd generation description of CaO and CaO2,” Calphad, vol. 69, p. 101764, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101764

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101764 2020

[32] [33]

From Zero Kelvin Upwards: Thermodynamic Modeling of the Mn-Ni System with Third Generation Calphad Models,

L. Hao, S. Bigdeli, and W. Xiong, “From Zero Kelvin Upwards: Thermodynamic Modeling of the Mn-Ni System with Third Generation Calphad Models,” J. Phase Equilibria Diffus., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1182–1193, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11669-024- 01165-0

work page doi:10.1007/s11669-024- 2024

[33] [34]

The third generation Calphad description of Al–C including revisions of pure Al and C,

Z. He, B. Kaplan, H. Mao, and M. Selleby, “The third generation Calphad description of Al–C including revisions of pure Al and C,” Calphad, vol. 72, p. 102250, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2021.102250

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2021.102250 2021

[34] [35]

Third generation Calphad: Thermodynamic assessment of the Ni-Ga system with physics-based models,

L. Hao, C. Shen, N. M. Fortunato, H. Zhang, and W. Xiong, “Third generation Calphad: Thermodynamic assessment of the Ni-Ga system with physics-based models,” Calphad, vol. 88, p. 102797, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2024.102797

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2024.102797 2025

[35] [36]

A third generation Calphad description of W–C including a revision of liquid C,

Z. He and M. Selleby, “A third generation Calphad description of W–C including a revision of liquid C,” Calphad, vol. 78, p. 102449, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102449

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102449 2022

[36] [37]

Use of third generation data for the elements to model the thermodynamics of binary alloy systems: Part 2 – The critical assessment of data for the Pb-Sn system,

A. V. Khvan, A. T. Dinsdale, and Q. Chen, “Use of third generation data for the elements to model the thermodynamics of binary alloy systems: Part 2 – The critical assessment of data for the Pb-Sn system,” Calphad, vol. 76, p. 102396, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102396

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102396 2022

[37] [38]

Use of third generation data for the elements to model the thermodynamics of binary alloy systems: Part 1 – The critical assessment of data for the Al-Zn system,

A. Dinsdale, O. Zobac, A. Kroupa, and A. Khvan, “Use of third generation data for the elements to model the thermodynamics of binary alloy systems: Part 1 – The critical assessment of data for the Al-Zn system,” Calphad, vol. 68, p. 101723, Mar. 2020, doi: 29 10.1016/j.calphad.2019.101723

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.101723 2020

[38] [39]

A third generation CalPhaD assessment of the Fe–Mn–Ti system Part II: The ternary system Fe–Mn–Ti,

A. Walnsch, A. Leineweber, and M. J. Kriegel, “A third generation CalPhaD assessment of the Fe–Mn–Ti system Part II: The ternary system Fe–Mn–Ti,” Calphad, vol. 81, p. 102553, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.CALPHAD.2023.102553

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102553 2023

[39] [40]

Use of third generation data for the pure elements to model the thermodynamics of binary alloy systems: Part 3 – The theoretical prediction of the Al–Si–Zn system,

O. Zobac, A. Kroupa, and A. Dinsdale, “Use of third generation data for the pure elements to model the thermodynamics of binary alloy systems: Part 3 – The theoretical prediction of the Al–Si–Zn system,” Calphad, vol. 87, p. 102742, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2024.102742

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2024.102742 2024

[40] [41]

On phase stability of Mo-Nb-Ta-W refractory high entropy alloys,

E. Zhang, Y. Tang, M. Wen, A. Obaied, I. Roslyakova, and L. Zhang, “On phase stability of Mo-Nb-Ta-W refractory high entropy alloys,” Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater., vol. 103, p. 105780, Feb. 2022, Accessed: Dec. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026343682200004X

work page 2022

[41] [42]

Third-generation thermodynamic descriptions of MoNbTaWHfZr refractory high entropy alloys and their phase stability,

J.-H. Gao, E.-K. Zhang, Y. Tang, L.-J. Zhang, J. Ding, and X.-C. Xia, “Third-generation thermodynamic descriptions of MoNbTaWHfZr refractory high entropy alloys and their phase stability,” Tungsten, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 582–600, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s42864- 024-00311-y

work page doi:10.1007/s42864- 2025

[42] [43]

Thermodynamic Modeling of the Ti-Hf-Zr-Nb-Ta Refractory High Entropy Alloy and Its Application in Analyzing Phase Stability,

J. Ding, J. Gao, E. Zhang, Y. Tang, L. Zhang, and X. Xia, “Thermodynamic Modeling of the Ti-Hf-Zr-Nb-Ta Refractory High Entropy Alloy and Its Application in Analyzing Phase Stability,” Comput. Mater. Contin., vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 539–556, 2025, doi: 10.32604/cmc.2025.067266

work page doi:10.32604/cmc.2025.067266 2025

[43] [44]

pycalphad: CALPHAD-based Computational Thermodynamics in Python,

R. Otis and Z. Liu, “pycalphad: CALPHAD-based Computational Thermodynamics in Python,” J. Open Res. Softw., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.5334/jors.140

work page doi:10.5334/jors.140 2017

[44] [45]

PyCalphad: Python library for computational thermodynamics using the CALPHAD 30 method

“PyCalphad: Python library for computational thermodynamics using the CALPHAD 30 method.” [Online]. Available: https://pycalphad.org

work page

[45] [46]

ESPEI for efficient thermodynamic database development, modification, and uncertainty quantification: application to Cu–Mg,

B. Bocklund, R. Otis, A. Egorov, A. Obaied, I. Roslyakova, and Z.-K. Liu, “ESPEI for efficient thermodynamic database development, modification, and uncertainty quantification: application to Cu–Mg,” MRS Commun., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 618–627, 2019, doi: 10.1557/mrc.2019.59

work page doi:10.1557/mrc.2019.59 2019

[46] [47]

ESPEI: Extensible Self-optimizing Phase Equilibria Infrastructure

“ESPEI: Extensible Self-optimizing Phase Equilibria Infrastructure.” [Online]. Available: https://espei.org

work page

[47] [48]

Thermodynamic properties of al, ni, nial, and ni3al from first-principles calculations,

Y. Wang, Z. K. Liu, and L. Q. Chen, “Thermodynamic properties of Al, Ni, NiAl, and Ni3Al from first-principles calculations,” Acta Mater., vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 2665–2671, May 2004, doi: 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2004.02.014

work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.014 2004

[48] [49]

Extensible Structure-Informed Prediction of Formation Energy with improved accuracy and usability employing neural networks,

A. M. Krajewski, J. W. Siegel, J. Xu, and Z.-K. Liu, “Extensible Structure-Informed Prediction of Formation Energy with improved accuracy and usability employing neural networks,” Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 208, p. 111254, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111254

work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111254 2022

[49] [50]

Nature Machine Intelligence5(9), 1031– 1041 (2023)

B. Deng et al., “CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge- informed atomistic modelling,” Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1031–1041, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s42256-023-00716-3

work page doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00716-3 2023

[50] [51]

Efficient structure-informed featurization and property prediction of ordered, dilute, and random atomic structures,

A. M. Krajewski, J. W. Siegel, and Z. K. Liu, “Efficient structure-informed featurization and property prediction of ordered, dilute, and random atomic structures,” Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 247, p. 113495, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2024.113495

work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113495 2025

[51] [52]

Thermodynamics of the Ce γ-α transition: Density-functional study,

Y. Wang, L. G. Hector, H. Zhang, S. L. Shang, L. Q. Chen, and Z. K. Liu, “Thermodynamics of the Ce γ-α transition: Density-functional study,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 78, no. 10, p. 104113, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.104113. 31

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.104113 2008

[52] [53]

A thermodynamic framework for a system with itinerant-electron magnetism,

Y. Wang, L. G. Hector, H. Zhang, S. L. Shang, L. Q. Chen, and Z. K. Liu, “A thermodynamic framework for a system with itinerant-electron magnetism,” in Zentropy: Theory and Fundamentals, Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2024, pp. 539–556. doi: 10.1201/9781032692401-15

work page doi:10.1201/9781032692401-15 2024

[53] [54]

Zentropy Theory for Positive and Negative Thermal Expansion,

Z.-K. Liu, Y. Wang, and S.-L. Shang, “Zentropy Theory for Positive and Negative Thermal Expansion,” in Zentropy, vol. 43, no. 6, New York: Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2024, pp. 497–514. doi: 10.1201/9781032692401-13

work page doi:10.1201/9781032692401-13 2024

[54] [55]

Quantitative predictive theories through integrating quantum, statistical, equilibrium, and nonequilibrium thermodynamics,

Z.-K. Liu, “Quantitative predictive theories through integrating quantum, statistical, equilibrium, and nonequilibrium thermodynamics,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 36, no. 34, p. 343003, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ad4762

work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ad4762 2024

[55] [56]

Ocean of Data: Integrating First-Principles Calculations and CALPHAD Modeling with Machine Learning,

Z. K. Liu, “Ocean of Data: Integrating First-Principles Calculations and CALPHAD Modeling with Machine Learning,” J. Phase Equilibria Diffus., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 635– 649, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1007/S11669-018-0654-Z/FIGURES/8

work page doi:10.1007/s11669-018-0654-z/figures/8 2018

[56] [57]

NIST alloy data,

B. Wilthan, “NIST alloy data,” National Institute of Standards and Technology. Accessed: Nov. 03, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.18434/M32153

work page doi:10.18434/m32153 2024

[57] [58]

Grimvall, Thermophysical properties of materials

G. Grimvall, Thermophysical properties of materials. Elsevier, 1999

work page 1999

[58] [59]

A model for alloying in ferromagnetic metals,

M. Hillert and M. Jarl, “A model for alloying in ferromagnetic metals,” Calphad, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 227–238, Jan. 1978, doi: 10.1016/0364-5916(78)90011-1

work page doi:10.1016/0364-5916(78)90011-1 1978

[59] [60]

An improved magnetic model for thermodynamic modeling,

W. Xiong, Q. Chen, P. A. Korzhavyi, and M. Selleby, “An improved magnetic model for thermodynamic modeling,” Calphad, vol. 39, pp. 11–20, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2012.07.002

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.07.002 2012

[60] [61]

Unifying the derivations for the Akaike and corrected Akaike information criteria,

J. E. Cavanaugh, “Unifying the derivations for the Akaike and corrected Akaike information criteria,” Stat. Probab. Lett., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 201–208, 1997, doi: 32 10.1016/s0167-7152(96)00128-9

work page doi:10.1016/s0167-7152(96)00128-9 1997

[61] [62]

Burnham and David R

K. P. Burnham and D. R. Anderson, “Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection,” 2004, Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA. doi: 10.1177/0049124104268644

work page doi:10.1177/0049124104268644 2004

[62] [63]

Gelman, J

A. Gelman, J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, and D. B. Rubin, Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1995

work page 1995

[63] [64]

Quantified uncertainty in thermodynamic modeling for materials design,

N. H. Paulson, B. J. Bocklund, R. A. Otis, Z.-K. Liu, and M. Stan, “Quantified uncertainty in thermodynamic modeling for materials design,” Acta Mater., vol. 174, pp. 9–15, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.017

work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.017 2019

[64] [65]

Comparison of statistically-based methods for automated weighting of experimental data in CALPHAD- type assessment,

N. H. Paulson, S. Zomorodpoosh, I. Roslyakova, and M. Stan, “Comparison of statistically-based methods for automated weighting of experimental data in CALPHAD- type assessment,” Calphad, vol. 68, p. 101728, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2019.101728

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.101728 2020

[65] [66]

Thermodynamic re-assessment of pure chromium using modified segmented regression model,

A. Obaied et al., “Thermodynamic re-assessment of pure chromium using modified segmented regression model,” Calphad, vol. 69, p. 101762, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101762

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101762 2020

[66] [67]

PureElementPRL,

A. Richter, “PureElementPRL,” Jan. 09, 2026, GitHub. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/amr8004/PureElementPRL

work page 2026

[67] [68]

Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed

C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2005

work page 2005

[68] [69]

An insight into using DFT data for Calphad modeling of solid phases in the third generation of Calphad databases, a case study for Al,

S. Bigdeli et al., “An insight into using DFT data for Calphad modeling of solid phases in the third generation of Calphad databases, a case study for Al,” Calphad, vol. 65, pp. 79– 85, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2019.02.008. 33

work page doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.02.008 2019

[69] [70]

Thermodynamic modeling of the LiCl-KCl-LaCl3 system with Bayesian model selection and uncertainty quantification,

R. Gong et al., “Thermodynamic modeling of the LiCl-KCl-LaCl3 system with Bayesian model selection and uncertainty quantification,” J. Mol. Liq., vol. 432, p. 127811, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2025.127811. 34 10 Figures Figure 1 Circled systems to be remodeled in a hypothetical 6 element database of A-B-C-D-E-F, if the thermodynamic description of ...

work page doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127811 2025